View Full Version : Rachel McAdams for Mary Jane
Catman
09-05-2005, 03:33 AM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/red_eye/_group_photos/rachel_mcadams1.jpg
How about McAdams for Spider-Man 4?
spider-jide
09-05-2005, 04:52 AM
It would be an improvement.
Silver Sable
09-05-2005, 11:29 AM
She seems good
Venom 1988
09-05-2005, 01:06 PM
Well she looks a hell of a lot better Kirsnt Dunst, or however you spell her name.
Catman
09-05-2005, 01:32 PM
If she ends up being considered then they should sign her up as soon as possible. If they wait till 2007 she will be a huge star and wouldn't want to do it. Right now her star is rising, so they should do it now. I'm pretty sure Dunst isn't going to return for the fourth installment.
Isn't she like 8 years older than Kirsten Dunst?
If they replace Toby and Kirsten for a new few movies, which I think they should after SM3, (or atleast I think they should also replace Tobey when they inevitably replace the inevitably gone Kirsten) they're going to go with actors a few years younger to keep them going at around the same age, not a decade older than they already had.
She looks pretty good when dolled up, but she's really in the same average league as Kirsten, all together. Maybe a better face, but a much inferior body. And I believe shorter (less model like).
Catman
09-05-2005, 02:19 PM
Isn't she like 8 years older than Kirsten Dunst?
If they replace Toby and Kirsten for a new few movies, which I think they should after SM3, (or atleast I think they should also replace Tobey when they inevitably replace the inevitably gone Kirsten) they're going to go with actors a few years younger to keep them going at around the same age, not a decade older than they already had.
She looks pretty good when dolled up, but she's really in the same average league as Kirsten, all together. Maybe a better face, but a much inferior body. And I believe shorter (less model like).
Yeah, Rachel is 29 right now. She'll be in here `30s if she plays MJ. But, that doesn't matter. Tobey is older than Peter Parker and I doubt they want younger. These characters are getting older in each film. By Spider-Man 4 they'll be in their mid-late `20s and dedicated to their profession.
Yeah, Rachel is 29 right now. She'll be in here `30s if she plays MJ. But, that doesn't matter. Tobey is older than Peter Parker and I doubt they want younger. These characters are getting older in each film. By Spider-Man 4 they'll be in their mid-late `20s and dedicated to their profession.
There is absolutely nothing to base said "doubt" on.
All logic would dictate giving your characters more time to age and get too old before you want them that when you have a franchise that takes 3 years in between films and your dealing with main characters that were always portrayed relatively young even after 40 plus years of comics, and they're still basically adapting the near beginning of his mythos.
It's a no brainer to go with people a few years younger for your next 2-to-3 films, which will span 6-9 years in time preciding as those characters.
Catman
09-05-2005, 03:19 PM
These characters are getting older in each film. In Spider-Man, Peter, MJ, and Harry were 17-18 years old. In Spider-Man 2 they were 19-20 years old. I'm pretty sure they'll be 20-23 years old in Spider-Man 3. The producers said they will only make a total of 6 films. It could change, of course, but the plan at the moment is for six films. And, we don't know the release date of the future films. Spider-Man 2 was released 2 years after the original and Spider-Man 3 will be 3 years. Spider-Man 4 could be released in 2009 or 2010. Or if the rumors are true of filming 3 and 4 at the same time then 2008. I don't know. Whatever. I just think Rachel McAdams would be good. If Dunst is pregnant then she'll be good for Spider-Man 3. She is after all about the same age as Tobey.
LarryLegend
09-05-2005, 09:37 PM
She's alot better than Dunst.
Doomed_hero
09-05-2005, 09:41 PM
She sure has the look and can act.
myfingershurt
09-05-2005, 10:14 PM
now that is a good idea. yea she can act.
spideyboy_1111
09-05-2005, 11:14 PM
too bad she comes off more as gwen.. rather then a hot sexy kitten... shes not MJ ... or ive yet to see her act like one in a movie.. though she probably could pull it off... i liked her in mean girls
TheSlag
09-05-2005, 11:32 PM
She's alot better than Dunst.
:up: Not that... that's saying much, unfortunately. :(
super-jide
09-06-2005, 12:58 AM
shes hot,sign her for the next film please.
Catman
09-06-2005, 02:30 AM
too bad she comes off more as gwen.. rather then a hot sexy kitten... shes not MJ ... or ive yet to see her act like one in a movie.. though she probably could pull it off... i liked her in mean girls
I think McAdams has proved that she can do anything.
White_Howling
09-06-2005, 02:53 AM
for the next three? yeah McAdams would be an improvement..
WATCH THE NOTEBOOK!!!
GoldGoblin
09-06-2005, 05:47 AM
Great choice.
Eh, I can't really see her as it. At all.
While it would be an improvement up against KD, you could say that about a lot of actresses. So when we get a new one, I want one spot on.
Catman
09-06-2005, 02:37 PM
for the next three?
The next three? Well, here's the dilemma. Spider-Man 4 will not begin pre-production till late 2007. By then she will be a huge star. They need to sign her now, while her star is rising. Secondly, unless they film Spider-Man 4/5 together I don't think she could be in the next three. She is 29 years old now. In Spidey 4 she'll be in her early `30s which is okay since these characters are getting older in each film. But, by Spider-Man 6 she'll already be pushing 40. So, I think she will be great for Spider-Man 4, but I don't know about part 5 and 6. Let's see what happens. If the rumors are true about filming Spider-Man 3 & 4 together, then McAdams will be great for 5 and 6. In Spidey 6 is released in 2011 then she'll just be 35. Lets see what happens. Nonetheless, I think she'll be great.
Catman
09-25-2005, 08:24 PM
Bump. Just cause I feel like it.
The Only Woj
09-28-2005, 07:59 PM
anything is better than Dunst. Dunst looked like garbage for almost all of Spider-Man 2.
Demogoblin
09-28-2005, 10:25 PM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/red_eye/_group_photos/rachel_mcadams1.jpg
*sigh* Damn thats an attactive woman. :O Not sure if she is MJ (well, maybe if the movie takes place about 5 years after SM2) but she seems a little to old to follow up after Dunst.
But damn, I love that woman. :o
spideyboy_1111
09-28-2005, 11:18 PM
shes umm younger and can play younger then kirsten... the girl played a very convincing highschooler in mean girls
The Black Mask
09-29-2005, 02:54 PM
i like the idea.
Demogoblin
09-29-2005, 02:56 PM
shes umm younger and can play younger then kirsten... the girl played a very convincing highschooler in mean girls
Uh huh. Rachel will be over 30 by the time SM4 comes out.
http://imdb.com/name/nm1046097/
Kirsten is barely in her 20's.
http://imdb.com/name/nm0000379/
Catman
09-30-2005, 06:34 PM
the girl played a very convincing highschooler in mean girls
That's true! Even though she's 30, she can play younger characters, and make it believable.
McADAMS DAMMIT! :mad:
You had to pull out the "dammit !" and make me hate you didn't ya. Silliness on SHH is fine. But don't be one of the "____ dammit !" childish bastards.
XshakeitOff
09-30-2005, 08:18 PM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/red_eye/_group_photos/rachel_mcadams1.jpg
How about McAdams for Spider-Man 4?HELL YEAH MCADAMS FOR MJ!! Im sick of DUNST! looks nothing Like MJ!!!
HELL YEAH MCADAMS FOR MJ!! Im sick of DUNST! looks nothing Like MJ!!!
McAdams has a prettier face, but that's the only way in which she's "closer". But the age and everything from the face down is more distant from MJ.
If they recast they should do Peter and MJ at the same time and make up some of the lost time with the characters (by only having a film every 3 or so years) with somewhat younger actors.
Not older and shorter, even if they played a high schooler 3 years ago. The age is eventually going to catch up with her. In addition to her wanting to play parts her own age, which won't work if you want to go back and forth with a character that will probably, even for the next few movies, be in college or just out of college.
Catman
09-30-2005, 09:43 PM
MJ is not even in college. Her acting career is at the rise. In Spider-Man 2 she was doing a play. I wouldn't be surprised if in Spider-Man 3 she's doing television or maybe a movie. And, I said it already, these characters are getting older in each film. In Spider-Man 3 don't be surprised to see Peter graduating from college.
MJ is not even in college. Her acting career is at the rise. In Spider-Man 2 she was doing a play. I wouldn't be surprised if in Spider-Man 3 she's doing television or maybe a movie. And, I said it already, these characters are getting older in each film. In Spider-Man 3 don't be surprised to see Peter graduating from college.
They're getting older because they have to due to the actors aging, not because it's helpful for a franchise adapting characters and 40 years of storylines which don't age much more than 10 years in that entire real world 40 year time span. And they've only scratched the surface of the Spidey mythos.
I really doubt you'd find one studio exec OR filmmaker/producer involved who wouldn't see it as obvious the advantage of a younger actor for either role when you do in fact need to recast for prolonging the franchise
Lazarus440
10-01-2005, 01:31 AM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v83/spi440/untitled.jpg
Infinity9999x
10-01-2005, 12:47 PM
I really don't care about getting a new actor for MJ as much about rewriting her character. I have still yet to see MJ on screen, I'm tired of watching GweMJ
Catman
10-01-2005, 05:21 PM
They're getting older because they have to due to the actors aging, not because it's helpful for a franchise adapting characters and 40 years of storylines which don't age much more than 10 years in that entire real world 40 year time span. And they've only scratched the surface of the Spidey mythos.
I really doubt you'd find one studio exec OR filmmaker/producer involved who wouldn't see it as obvious the advantage of a younger actor for either role when you do in fact need to recast for prolonging the franchise
You can't compare the comics to the movie franchise. They are both completely different. To begin with, they are only making a total of 6 Spider-Man films. Hence why the characters are getting older in each film. In Spider-Man, Peter Parker, was a recent high school graduate and college freshmen trying to get used to his powers. As well as obtaining some responsibility. In Spider-Man 2, he was trying to balance his everyday life (college and work) with being a superhero. So, I can imagine the rest of the series will be like this:
Spider-Man 3: Upon graduating from college, Peter is trying to make a commitment to his profession and his relationship with MJ, while being Spider-Man.
Spider-Man 4: If MJ left Peter in Spider-Man 3, then he's probably just mourning the lost of the love his life. Until Black Cat comes into the picture. He will be a lot older and wiser, so he wouldn't make the same mistakes from the past. If MJ didn't leave Peter, then they probably got married. So, this film will be Peter struggling to maintain a healthy marriage life.
Spider-Man 5: If MJ left him in SM3, then he's probably still with Black Cat or she left him (or vice versa). Aunt May is probably dead by now. Who knows! So, Spider-Man realizes that he's reaching his thirties and he's basically just Spider-Man. Peter Parker no longer has a life of his own. So, he tries to make some changes. Perhaps attempting to revive his relationship with MJ. Now, if Peter and MJ got married in SM3, then she probably leaves him because she can't handle the direction Peter's life has taken.
Spider-Man 6 (The FINAL Film): If MJ left Peter in SM3, then they probably get together in this film and the movie ends with their marriage. If Peter and MJ got married in SM3, then after leaving Peter in SM5 she decides to give him a second chance. Peter decides that while being Spider-Man is important, it is also important to be Peter Parker and have a life of his own with MJ. The film ends with MJ discovering that she's pregnant.
THE END.
The Black Mask
10-06-2005, 08:01 PM
how about Laura Prepon for Mary Jane:
http://www.cinemamontreal.com/images/people-612-lauraprepon.jpg
OobeDoobBenubi
10-06-2005, 09:05 PM
No re casting. If kristen leaves the franchise. Mary Jane leaves :up:
Catman
10-06-2005, 10:16 PM
Yeah, she could leave and Black Cat can be around for a while. Then, she returns and they get married. THE END.
Isla Fisher should play Mary Jane
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/new_line_cinema/wedding_crashers/isla_fisher/crasherpres.jpg
how about Laura Prepon for Mary Jane:
http://www.cinemamontreal.com/images/people-612-lauraprepon.jpg
Just because she's scripted as some bombshell in "That 70's Show" doesn't make her one. Chicks always been barely above average, and that's putting it charitably. In famous young actress terms, she's pretty beat.
No re casting. If kristen leaves the franchise. Mary Jane leaves :up:
So what if Tobey leaves ???
I think most people would rather have 6 movies with one recasting of the main cast after the 3rd or 4th movie than 3 movies just so you don't have new actors playing the same characters.
spider-jide
10-07-2005, 05:17 AM
Just because she's scripted as some bombshell in "That 70's Show" doesn't make her one. Chicks always been barely above average, and that's putting it charitably. In famous young actress terms, she's pretty beat.
http://www.freehomepages.com/celebzone10/LauraPrepon/laura6.jpg
http://www.blazinbeauties.com/images/laura_prepon_pictures/laura_prepon_08.jpg
http://www.actressass.com/pictures-1/laura_prepon/laura-prepon-16.jpg
She'd make an awesome gwen too!
http://www.screensavershot.com/persons2/laurapre.jpg
http://www.freehomepages.com/celebzone10/LauraPrepon/laura2.jpg
The Green Goblin
10-07-2005, 03:29 PM
The best choice for Mary Jane is "The sexiest woman alive.
http://img12.imagevenue.com/loc211/th_91c_jessica1.jpg (http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc211&image=91c_jessica1.jpg) http://img18.imagevenue.com/loc150/th_bf3_jessica7.jpg (http://img18.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc150&image=bf3_jessica7.jpg) http://img22.imagevenue.com/loc130/th_393_jessica10.jpg (http://img22.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc130&image=393_jessica10.jpg)
Lazarus440
10-07-2005, 06:17 PM
The best choice for Mary Jane is "The sexiest woman alive.
http://img12.imagevenue.com/loc211/th_91c_jessica1.jpg (http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc211&image=91c_jessica1.jpg) http://img18.imagevenue.com/loc150/th_bf3_jessica7.jpg (http://img18.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc150&image=bf3_jessica7.jpg) http://img22.imagevenue.com/loc130/th_393_jessica10.jpg (http://img22.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc130&image=393_jessica10.jpg)
yeah um no.
Lazarus440
10-07-2005, 06:18 PM
Isla Fisher should play Mary Jane
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/new_line_cinema/wedding_crashers/isla_fisher/crasherpres.jpg
she is 31 years old, why pick her when everyone wants younger.
Trigger
10-07-2005, 07:19 PM
Why does everyone want younger? It would seem more sensible to cast older versions of the characters.
Catman
10-07-2005, 08:59 PM
http://www.freehomepages.com/celebzone10/LauraPrepon/laura6.jpg
She has a much better body than McAdams, but she is not a better actress. We want the choice of MJ to be based on talent first, then looks. Rachel McAdams is very good looking and a very good actress.
she is 31 years old, why pick her when everyone wants younger.
Actor age doesn't matter, as long as the person appears the right age. Kirsten may be a lot younger, but looks ten years older than Tobey. On the other hand, if you've seen Isla in Wedding Crashers she doesn't look anywhere near 30.
Chicken&IceTEA
10-07-2005, 11:38 PM
The best choice for Mary Jane is "The sexiest woman alive.
http://img12.imagevenue.com/loc211/th_91c_jessica1.jpg (http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc211&image=91c_jessica1.jpg) http://img18.imagevenue.com/loc150/th_bf3_jessica7.jpg (http://img18.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc150&image=bf3_jessica7.jpg) http://img22.imagevenue.com/loc130/th_393_jessica10.jpg (http://img22.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc130&image=393_jessica10.jpg)um yaeh HECK YES BEIL IS THE PERFECT MJ! and was rumored to be in part 1 &2
Chicken&IceTEA
10-07-2005, 11:39 PM
She has a much better body than McAdams, but she is not a better actress. We want the choice of MJ to be based on talent first, then looks. Rachel McAdams is very good looking and a very good actress.who the hell is this we Catman this is not the phucking Boirg! Speak for Yourself!!
The Black Mask
10-07-2005, 11:56 PM
another pic of laura prepon
http://www.vh1.com/sitewide/flipbooks/img/shows/maxim_hot_100_2005/84_laura_prepon.jpg
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 12:32 AM
yeah um no.
"Yeah um" ... *whatever* :rolleyes:
Carry on with your Mary Jane who is not sexy or attractive. :marv:
Lazarus440
10-08-2005, 12:37 AM
"Yeah um" ... *whatever* :rolleyes:
Carry on with your Mary Jane who is not sexy or attractive. :marv:
how did you know that i am the casting director for all the spider-man movies?
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 12:48 AM
how did you know that i am the casting director for all the spider-man movies?
You seem so against casting someone hot and sexy as Mary Jane. :o
Wouldn't want to give the kiddies stiffers. :eek:
Catman
10-08-2005, 12:51 AM
kiddies got stiffers from Michelle Pheiffers Catwoman.
Why does everyone want younger? It would seem more sensible to cast older versions of the characters.
No, it wouldn't at all.
These are frigging comic book characters. Who age 15 years in 50 real world years. The movies haven't even scratched the surface of telling Spidey's stories. He's perpetually young. We don't need middle aged actors playing him, his girlfriend, and his bes friend.
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 12:54 AM
kiddies got stiffers from Michelle Pheiffers Catwoman.
Yessss ... we all did. :D
*bullwhip cracks* ;)
Lazarus440
10-08-2005, 12:59 AM
You seem so against casting someone hot and sexy as Mary Jane. :o
Wouldn't want to give the kiddies stiffers. :eek:i am not against it, i just haven't seen any one post some one that fits right. they all post chicks with big tits and girls that couldn't act their way out of their bra if some one showed them how. or they want some one that can't do the movies and ***** when some one tells them so.
also i don't see how it matters seeing as they aren't changeing the cast any time soon.
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 01:19 AM
i am not against it, i just haven't seen any one post some one that fits right. they all post chicks with big tits and girls that couldn't act their way out of their bra if some one showed them how. or they want some one that can't do the movies and ***** when some one tells them so.
also i don't see how it matters seeing as they aren't changeing the cast any time soon.
What?
I could post a pic of my dog and it would be an improvement and my dog is a male. :eek: Er ... j/k ... sorta ;)
Its not all Dunst's fault. I mean she was miscast IMO, but its also the writers who made her sort of a Gwen/MJ hybrid. It really is a mess, and the reason for the speculating is that most believe 3 is the last one for KD. (Thank God).
The reason I have been an advocate for Biel from the beginning is she is 5'8, has greenish eyes, can look good as a redhead, is super sexy is and can easily pull off the wild, strong, outgoing party girl thing. Of course you'd need a stronger Peter Parker/Spidey than Maguire but thats another story. ;)
Bottom line (besides Biel's bottom :eek:) is you can look at Kirsten Dunst a 100 different ways to Sunday and she's no "jackpot".
Chicken&IceTEA
10-08-2005, 01:23 AM
i am not against it, i just haven't seen any one post some one that fits right. they all post chicks with big tits and girls that couldn't act their way out of their bra if some one showed them how. or they want some one that can't do the movies and ***** when some one tells them so.
also i don't see how it matters seeing as they aren't changeing the cast any time soon.obviously laz you either have EXTREMLEY BAD taste in Woman or are just gay if you think Jessica beil isnt a Hot mj!:down
Chicken&IceTEA
10-08-2005, 01:25 AM
What?
I could post a pic of my dog and it would be an improvement and my dog is a male. :eek: Er ... j/k ... sorta ;)
Its not all Dunst's fault. I mean she was miscast IMO, but its also the writers who made her sort of a Gwen/MJ hybrid. It really is a mess, and the reason for the speculating is that most believe 3 is the last one for KD. (Thank God).
The reason I have been an advocate for Biel from the beginning is she is 5'8, has greenish eyes, can look good as a redhead, is super sexy is and can easily pull off the wild, strong, outgoing party girl thing. Of course you'd need a stronger Peter Parker/Spidey than Maguire but thats another story. ;)
Bottom line (besides Biel's bottom :eek:) is you can look at Kirsten Dunst a 100 different ways to Sunday and she's no "jackpot".lol exactly,i wouldn't see dunst and be like Woah! man did i hit the JAckpot!:rolleyes:
Lazarus440
10-08-2005, 01:33 AM
obviously laz you either have EXTREMLEY BAD taste in Woman or are just gay if you think Jessica beil isnt a Hot mj!:down
yes i am gay because i don't think she would make a good mj :rolleyes:.
i just don't see the point in fighting over the actor that plays mj at this point. the part was cast 5 years ago and has stayd that way for 2 now going on 3 movies. i just find it sad that every time they make a new spider-man movie and they don't recast MJ people here whine like little kids in the toy department at wal-mart.
Lazarus440
10-08-2005, 01:34 AM
What?
I could post a pic of my dog and it would be an improvement and my dog is a male. :eek: Er ... j/k ... sorta ;)
Its not all Dunst's fault. I mean she was miscast IMO, but its also the writers who made her sort of a Gwen/MJ hybrid. It really is a mess, and the reason for the speculating is that most believe 3 is the last one for KD. (Thank God).
The reason I have been an advocate for Biel from the beginning is she is 5'8, has greenish eyes, can look good as a redhead, is super sexy is and can easily pull off the wild, strong, outgoing party girl thing. Of course you'd need a stronger Peter Parker/Spidey than Maguire but thats another story. ;)
Bottom line (besides Biel's bottom :eek:) is you can look at Kirsten Dunst a 100 different ways to Sunday and she's no "jackpot".you didn't even read my post did you?
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 01:40 AM
you didn't even read my post did you?
Er ... no ... did you say something important? :p
:confused:
Guess you don't believe an attractive, well built gal can act. :rolleyes:
You like Dunst ... fine ... not that there's anything wrong with that. ;)
Lazarus440
10-08-2005, 01:45 AM
Er ... no ... did you say something important? :p
:confused:
Guess you don't believe an attractive, well built gal can act. :rolleyes:
You like Dunst ... fine ... not that there's anything wrong with that. ;)
yes she is hot, but she is not MJ.
Chicken&IceTEA
10-08-2005, 01:47 AM
yes she is hot, but she is not MJ.Beil is Hot and is MJ personified, Dunst is NOt HOT and not Mj dude!:down
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 01:50 AM
yes she is hot, but she is not MJ.
Who? Dunst? :confused:
Really, instead of criticizing other's OPINIONS how about offering your own opinion or suggestion as to who would make a good MJ and why.
... and curious to how you define "who is Mary Jane", because believe me brother, Dunst aint it.
Lazarus440
10-08-2005, 01:58 AM
Who? Dunst? :confused:
Really, instead of criticizing other's OPINIONS how about offering your own opinion or suggestion as to who would make a good MJ and why.
... and curious to how you define "who is Mary Jane", because believe me brother, Dunst aint it.Jessaca isn't MJ, i just don't see it. i think she would look bad with red hair (dye or wig) and i don't think she has the acting chops.
could they do better with MJ? sure they could. will they any time soon? no.
but i can't find any one that would work right now.
The Green Goblin
10-08-2005, 02:21 AM
Jessaca isn't MJ, i just don't see it. i think she would look bad with red hair (dye or wig) and i don't think she has the acting chops.
could they do better with MJ? sure they could. will they any time soon? no.
but i can't find any one that would work right now.
Well, she looks OK to me here. :)
http://goblinjournals.com/biel-Mary%20Jane.jpg
at least you listed some specifics. You don't think she can act, fine (obviously you haven't seen the "masterpiece" that is 7th Heaven. :eek: :D ;)
She's better suited than Dunst IMO and how much "acting chops" do you need to portray a comicbook character anyway? There's got to be a compromise between acting and physical appearence/personality, ie, Meryl Streep could not play Mary Jane Watson. ;)
Maybe it would be best to cast an "unkown" in the role ala Superman. But anything is better than Dunst IMO. I think there are at least a dozen actresses that could have done a better job.
Chicken&IceTEA
10-08-2005, 02:39 AM
Well, she looks OK to me here. :)
http://goblinjournals.com/biel-Mary%20Jane.jpg
at least you listed some specifics. You don't think she can act, fine (obviously you haven't seen the "masterpiece" that is 7th Heaven. :eek: :D ;)
She's better suited than Dunst IMO and how much "acting chops" do you need to portray a comicbook character anyway? There's got to be a compromise between acting and physical appearence/personality, ie, Meryl Streep could not play Mary Jane Watson. ;)
Maybe it would be best to cast an "unkown" in the role ala Superman. But anything is better than Dunst IMO. I think there are at least a dozen actresses that could have done a better job.wow Love that pic Goblin! she is perfect MJ material! Smokin!!!!
tamron
10-08-2005, 11:51 AM
Biel was always my first choice for MJ. I think she's perfect for the role. She's hot, hot enough to plausibly be a model, but in a lot of roles Jessica has shown the ability to convey a 'girl next door' vibe that is perfect for MJ. I think she would fit the role very well.
http://www.uknet.net/showcase/Signedpics/jessica_biel1.sized.jpg
http://pc59te.dte.uma.es/cdb/series/marvel/bitmaps/mj.jpg
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MMPH/245948~Jessica-Biel.jpg
TheSlag
10-08-2005, 01:08 PM
The best choice for Mary Jane is "The sexiest woman alive.
http://img12.imagevenue.com/loc211/th_91c_jessica1.jpg (http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc211&image=91c_jessica1.jpg) http://img18.imagevenue.com/loc150/th_bf3_jessica7.jpg (http://img18.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc150&image=bf3_jessica7.jpg) http://img22.imagevenue.com/loc130/th_393_jessica10.jpg (http://img22.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc130&image=393_jessica10.jpg)
Damn.... Baby's got Back. :up:
I think she would be an excellent choice. My only fear is... she would probably eat poor little Tobey alive. ;)
TrueBeliever
10-08-2005, 07:44 PM
No, it wouldn't at all.
These are frigging comic book characters. Who age 15 years in 50 real world years. The movies haven't even scratched the surface of telling Spidey's stories. He's perpetually young. We don't need middle aged actors playing him, his girlfriend, and his bes friend.
Good point. I feel like we're getting the cliff notes of Spider-Man here...
But I also don't feel Jessica Biel as MJ. I just don't. While she's older than the MJ in my mind, or the comics (in some instances), or even the movies (at this point in her and Peter's life, they should be early 20s), Jessica actually looks that old. And I haven't been drawn to watch any of her works to gather a good feel of her acting ablilites. So no... not really for her. But that's my opinion.
Another opinion (if you're still reading...) is that I've always thought Laura Prepon would be a great MJ. Watching her character and acting in "That 70's Show", especially against Topher Grace (who always reminded me of "you know who"), really helped me imagine her as Mary Jane. In her girl next door attire she wears on the show, I thought she was beautiful, witty, and cool. In those beautiful pictures wonderfully provided above, I think the point is further proven. She's not a direct hit of a bombshell, but she's beautiful, stunningly so, and could pull of the MJ in my head better than the writers and Dunst have so far. Only one problem... She'd dwarf Tobey, wouldn't she?
Wasn't Isla Fisher in "Wedding Crashers" with McAdams? She was the scary girl, right? Yeah... uh, no... She'd get the bubbly, fun MJ down pretty nicely, but she's another one whos face just doesn't fit the MJ "look" I think they should go for. Sure, she managed to look very young in Wedding Crashers and older when she needed to. But I just don't feel her.
Rachel McAdams. Wow. I really didn't like her (character) in Mean Girls (opposite "could've been a great Ultimate MJ, pre-blonde, pre-weightloss" Lohan). But that was a good thing. She played her part well. I laughed when I saw her advertised in that "Notebook" drama (I haven't seen it yet but heard its pretty good). Coming out of "Flightplan", I heard someone say "Red Eye" was better, but I still haven't seen it. However, I did watch "Wedding Crashers" and I was amazed by her acting abilities. I think very few actors and actresses can act with their eyes well (Clint Eastwood, Mel Gibson, and Angela Bassett come to mind. Tobey doesn't). McAdams is close to getting on that list. I "loved" her in that film. She was beautiful, fun, and convincing in her role (the writing barely helped her with that...). And considering that only a few years ago, she played a teenager, and in "Wedding Crashers", I thought she was only 23 or so (so did my friends when I asked them), I think she could pull off a young MJ. I didn't know different until I logged onto imdb.com...
I would love to see McAdams as MJ. She'd make the movie so much better than Dunst has so far. Good suggestion.
'Nuff Said
10-09-2005, 07:27 PM
that is a very good idea, but is it for sure Kiersten will leave on SM4?
TrueBeliever
10-09-2005, 09:40 PM
Nah, nothing's for sure yet. I suppose this is all wishful thinking. I think its kind of funny that so many people agree that she should be replaced. I personally think Dunst and the writers have paid little respect to the character we know as MJ. One thing that could've helped this case would've been an alternative to MJ. I know Gwen, or most other additional female characters would hurt the story line's flow (imagine two sappy love stories!), but even if they had to go their own route, they could've pumped-up Betty Brant's involvement in Peter's life (especially her dislike for Spidey). Peter girl problems, but it wasn't just one girl he had problems with.
Kirsten needs to become a bigger girl when she performs "MJ"s role, otherwise, she should probably go.
can anyone find or make some screencaps of Biel in "Cellular"? She had red hair, and yeah, she would have been perfect IMO.
Actually I shouldn't use the word "perfect", when I criticize others for it when it's clearly not the case. She would have been GREAT. Not "perfect". Better than Dunst, much better than any of these too-short and/or too-old chicks getting suggested elsewhere in this thread.
found some caps
http://img421.imageshack.us/img421/7922/biel4yv.jpg
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/222/biel24so.jpg
The Green Goblin
10-10-2005, 09:24 AM
Dear LOrd, there "it" is again. :eek: (second pic from top left. ^) :up:
Good point. I feel like we're getting the cliff notes of Spider-Man here...
But I also don't feel Jessica Biel as MJ. I just don't. While she's older than the MJ in my mind, or the comics (in some instances), or even the movies (at this point in her and Peter's life, they should be early 20s), Jessica actually looks that old. And I haven't been drawn to watch any of her works to gather a good feel of her acting ablilites.
She's 23. :confused: And how could you form a solid opinion if you haven't seen her acting? Anyway, I guess its good that we all have opinions because, in mine that 70's girl isn't even close to MJ. She's too "rough around the edges". The McAdams is WAY too girl-next-door to be MJ. Biel played a beautiful girl next door with a WILD hair on that TV show she was on and was once described as "The bombshell next door". Mary Jane should be that, "The bombshell next door."
Besides .... look at "it"! :eek: :D
http://img22.imagevenue.com/loc130/th_393_jessica10.jpg (http://img22.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc130&image=393_jessica10.jpg)
TheSlag
10-10-2005, 10:00 AM
found some caps
http://img421.imageshack.us/img421/7922/biel4yv.jpg
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/222/biel24so.jpg
Damn... she makes Snaggle Tooth look like dog-meat. :eek: Of course dog-meat makes Snaggle Tooth... well... you get the idea. ;)
I have no idea what you just said. But no need to quote posts with big pics in them like that, unless you need to identify one pic out of many. Just edit the pics out.
Oh, snaggletooth, Dunst, I get it.
I was thinkin
http://www.planetforce.com/SNAGGLETOOTH.JPG
The Green Goblin
10-10-2005, 10:32 AM
:D
www.wwtdd.com
"Bloom is not to Blame"
" ... Even though everyone who has seen Elizabethtown seems to hate it, its not the fault of Orlando Bloom. ...
If Bloom is bad in this, keep in mind that he was cast in a romantic movie with Kirsten Dunst, so what the hell could you really expect. No amount of training ever taught him how to pretend to find a lazy eyed, snaggle toothed troll attractive. He was probably much better off camera as he sat in a tub all night crying and scrubbing his skin raw with a loofa, mumbling about how he cant get clean. I don’t think this guy is a great actor or anything, but he had a chain smoking, Stewie-looking sabertooth digging into his lip in every scene. Obviously that’s not gonna lend itself to a creative work environment.
LMFAO ... ! :D
http://img447.imageshack.us/img447/1482/kd143ah.th.jpg (http://img447.imageshack.us/my.php?image=kd143ah.jpg)
Elizabethtown is a LOTR reunion
http://img428.imageshack.us/img428/1487/kkollum7pd.jpg
TrueBeliever
10-10-2005, 04:47 PM
LMFAO!! You guys are rough. I'll admit, I was forced to watch a bit of "Seventh Heaven" when my sis had the remote, I always thought of her as a brat. And I completely forgot that she was in "Cellular". ...I can't tell if there's a good or bad reason for that or not... Maybe I'll rent it again. Even still, despite her very nice assets, I can't see her as "MJ". I mean, there are some I can see and some I can't. I couldn't see Scarlett Johannsen as MJ but would love to see her in one of the movies.
If you can't see her as MJ but can see Dunst, it's because you've already seen Dunst play her and no other reason.
spideyboy_1111
10-10-2005, 08:49 PM
lol why rent cellular, shes hardly in it.. watch blade trinity.. shes in most of that
lol why rent cellular, shes hardly in it.. watch blade trinity.. shes in most of that
Because Cellular is a great movie and Blade Trinity is a mess.
spideyboy_1111
10-10-2005, 09:31 PM
ummm we werent talking good movies , but acting
TheSlag
10-11-2005, 03:54 AM
I have no idea what you just said. But no need to quote posts with big pics in them like that, unless you need to identify one pic out of many. Just edit the pics out.
Thanks for the advice Dad. :rolleyes: And if I like quoting the pictures because I think they're kick ass??? You know, kinda like bumping a thread that you like???
Oh yeah... almost forgot....
:p ;)
TheSlag
10-11-2005, 03:56 AM
:D
www.wwtdd.com
"Bloom is not to Blame"
" ... Even though everyone who has seen Elizabethtown seems to hate it, its not the fault of Orlando Bloom. ...
If Bloom is bad in this, keep in mind that he was cast in a romantic movie with Kirsten Dunst, so what the hell could you really expect. No amount of training ever taught him how to pretend to find a lazy eyed, snaggle toothed troll attractive. He was probably much better off camera as he sat in a tub all night crying and scrubbing his skin raw with a loofa, mumbling about how he cant get clean. I don’t think this guy is a great actor or anything, but he had a chain smoking, Stewie-looking sabertooth digging into his lip in every scene. Obviously that’s not gonna lend itself to a creative work environment.
LMFAO ... ! :D
http://img447.imageshack.us/img447/1482/kd143ah.th.jpg (http://img447.imageshack.us/my.php?image=kd143ah.jpg)
ROFLMFAO... :D and adding a new site to my bookmarks. :up:
TheSlag
10-11-2005, 03:58 AM
http://img447.imageshack.us/img447/1482/kd143ah.jpg
Damn. She looks more and more like Grannie from the Beverly Hillbillies every day.
*sorry Grannie... you're probably spinnin in your grave right now*
TheSlag
10-11-2005, 04:02 AM
found some caps
http://img421.imageshack.us/img421/7922/biel4yv.jpg
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/222/biel24so.jpg
We now return you to your normal fantasy... had this been a real emergency, and Snaggle Tooth had been the only source to fullfill your fantasy... you would have been instructed to run screaming out of the thread.... :D
Ohhh... and just so BT18 does not get too upset ;)... I love "it" and the look (pouty you been bad and need a good spankin look ... YEAH BABBBYYYY) in the second and third from left top pic. :up:
Thanks for the advice Dad. :rolleyes: And if I like quoting the pictures because I think they're kick ass??? You know, kinda like bumping a thread that you like???
Oh yeah... almost forgot....
:p ;)
You can just quote the post and edit the pics out. It saves everyone time navigating threads. Particularly those poor souls on dial-up.
TrueBeliever
10-11-2005, 10:13 PM
If you can't see her as MJ but can see Dunst, it's because you've already seen Dunst play her and no other reason. Trust me, I've never seen Dunst as MJ. Ever.
tonytr1687
10-11-2005, 10:39 PM
Why are people so hung up on this uber-hot MJ of the comics? This is the movie universe, and in the movie universe MJ is the beautiful but not overly gorgeous girl next door type. In that respect McAdams fits perfectly, and even though she may be older she still looks much younger. Considering she's eons better than Biel in the acting department I'd take her for the role any day. What's with everyone thinking that Dunst is ugly? She may not look so hot in SM2 (she did look a little frumpy in some scenes) but she can still pass for a model (look at that perfume ad in the beginning of SM2) and it just goes to show that most models are all made-up to look like that. Anyway my point on Dunst is, she's much hotter in other movies and I think she does a decent enough acting job for the girlfriend role. The problem all of you have is she's not exactly like the comics, but it doesn't mean that the movie MJ doesn't work within the story.
Because Cellular is a great movie and Blade Trinity is a mess.
Oh snaps!
Why are people so hung up on this uber-hot MJ of the comics? This is the movie universe, and in the movie universe MJ is the beautiful but not overly gorgeous girl next door type.
beautiful, but not overly gorgeous ... :confused:
one of them oxymoron thingies i guess .... :o
id describe it more as a kind of cute in the right sort of light ... and that aint mj.
Just because a movie has a made up billboard with an actresses face on it (essentially a photoshop job) doesn't make her passable for or as hot as a real big time model who would get the kind of campaign that would put you on a Manhattan billboard advertising perfume.
tonytr1687
10-12-2005, 01:17 PM
Just because a movie has a made up billboard with an actresses face on it (essentially a photoshop job) doesn't make her passable for or as hot as a real big time model who would get the kind of campaign that would put you on a Manhattan billboard advertising perfume.
Still, Kirsten has actually done modeling ads in real life, so to say she's not suited to play a model in a movie doesn't make any sense. And even though the billboard was made up for the movie, model billboards in the real world are made up too, and judging by the fact that she looks good on it, i'd say she can pass as a model. My main point is I don't see why ppl think Dunst is so ugly when she's been way hotter in other movies.
tonytr1687
10-12-2005, 01:20 PM
beautiful, but not overly gorgeous ... :confused:
one of them oxymoron thingies i guess .... :o
id describe it more as a kind of cute in the right sort of light ... and that aint mj.
There's a difference between pretty/beautiful and uber-sexy steaming hot like a Victoria Secret model. And those of you who say MJ should be like a Victoria model are idiots, because she's also supposed to be the girl next door type. So I think the pretty/cute look is a good balance.
Still, Kirsten has actually done modeling ads in real life, so to say she's not suited to play a model in a movie doesn't make any sense. And even though the billboard was made up for the movie, model billboards in the real world are made up too, and judging by the fact that she looks good on it, i'd say she can pass as a model. My main point is I don't see why ppl think Dunst is so ugly when she's been way hotter in other movies.
um, she has? where?
If she has it was for her celebrity, not her beauty. Like some makeup or skincare add, the kind that Queen Latifah gets.
tonytr1687
10-12-2005, 02:55 PM
um, she has? where?
If she has it was for her celebrity, not her beauty. Like some makeup or skincare add, the kind that Queen Latifah gets.
It's called all those skimpy lay-outs she used to do in entertainment magazines and maxim and whatnot. That's still considered modeling whether you like it or not. And since when did Queen Latifah do skin-care ads? A lot of people here just seem to jump on Dunst-hating bandwagon and it makes me sick.
No that isn't modeling. It's publicity and self promotion. It isn't "Dunst hating". Unless in peoples psychotic minds anyone that any other person doesn't consider hot or hot enough is "hated" by them.
tonytr1687
10-12-2005, 03:38 PM
It's a form of modeling because they're posing for photos. Modeling is more than just people showing off clothes while walking down a runway, I would know I used to be in the business. And I'm not just talking about people calling her ugly when I refer to Dunst-hating, I'm talking about how they bash her for everything. Outside of these boards she's actually respected a little more than other young actresses now after roles in Eternal Sunshine, Virgin Suicides, Crazy/Beautiful, as well as the Spidey flicks. Yes she may be ditzy in real life but I'm talking about her work on film. It's not all cheerleader teen flicks.
Kmack
10-12-2005, 11:48 PM
I absolutely LOVE Rachel McAdams (after watching Mean Girls) but we already have a Mary Jane. I think she could pull off Gwen Stacy:up:
There's a difference between pretty/beautiful and uber-sexy steaming hot like a Victoria Secret model.
you're right there is a difference between "pretty" and "beautiful" and lately Kirsten is pushing hittin on pretty.
and where the **** did you get the idea mj was the girl next door type what comics you been reading? :confused:
besides ... big difference between the girl next door and the dog next door. :o
Venom Freddie
10-12-2005, 11:54 PM
Good choice!
tonytr1687
10-13-2005, 12:34 AM
you're right there is a difference between "pretty" and "beautiful" and lately Kirsten is pushing hittin on pretty.
and where the **** did you get the idea mj was the girl next door type what comics you been reading? :confused:
besides ... big difference between the girl next door and the dog next door. :o
MJ was his next door neighbor, that's what I mean. And dog next door? WTF is with you people? You obviously haven't seen ugly if you think Kirsten is a dog. Watch her in Bring it On or Elizabethtown and tell me she's a dog.
MJ was his next door neighbor, that's what I mean. And dog next door? WTF is with you people? You obviously haven't seen ugly if you think Kirsten is a dog. Watch her in Bring it On or Elizabethtown and tell me she's a dog.
living next door (which was a retcon btw) is not the same as a "girl next door type". mary jane is a knockout drop dead gorgeous *jackpot*. If kirsten represents that for you i feel sorry for you. :o
... watched 'em ... *sound of a can-opener* *woof woof* :p :D
spider-jide
10-13-2005, 07:38 AM
MJ was his next door neighbor, that's what I mean. And dog next door? WTF is with you people? You obviously haven't seen ugly if you think Kirsten is a dog. Watch her in Bring it On or Elizabethtown and tell me she's a dog.
KD is not hot, never has been, she's pretty at best but her appearance in sm2 was a complete disaster. Bring it on? Meh, she was mediocre, Elizabethtown, like I'm really going to watch that garbage :rolleyes: again, she doesn't look anything extraordinaryly special in that too.
The fact is, KD needs to fix up and look sharp, thats how MJ is and if KD is playing the character, how about she represent the character to the fullest.
tonytr1687
10-13-2005, 01:46 PM
The fact is they're not trying to make Kirsten drop-dead gorgeous because in reality, what are the chances of a perfect Heidi Klum-esque model wanting to hook up with Peter? Not very good. They wanted MJ to be more girl next door so people can relate to her and for her relationship with Peter to be more realistic, and I like it that way. People need to accept this isn't the comics. And no I don't think Kirsten is drop-dead gorgeous, but anyone who thinks she's a dog hasn't seen Rosie O'Donnell or that bony chocolate cake girl or any other truly ugly actress. People just call Kirsten ugly b/c they're biased against her off-screen personality. I agree though that she didn't look so hot in SM2, but in other movies she's at the very least pretty and I don't see how pretty=ugly. It's not like any of you guys could even get someone like Kirsten anyway.
KD is not hot, never has been, she's pretty at best but her appearance in sm2 was a complete disaster. Bring it on? Meh, she was mediocre, Elizabethtown, like I'm really going to watch that garbage :rolleyes: again, she doesn't look anything extraordinaryly special in that too.
The fact is, KD needs to fix up and look sharp, thats how MJ is and if KD is playing the character, how about she represent the character to the fullest.
I think Kirsten was very hot in "Bring it On". To be hot I think she had to have the blonde hair, styled well, and show off her body.
Brodie_Bruce
10-13-2005, 05:31 PM
Rachel McAdams seems like a great replacement for K.D.
Kmack
10-13-2005, 06:46 PM
Oh, yeah she'd be a great replacement. . .but I just supposed MJ would die in Spidey 3 and they would just bring another woman into Peter's life (which has happened too often in the comics):o
TrueBeliever
10-13-2005, 09:53 PM
It is not a proven fact that drop-dead gorgeous girls want only gorgeous men. I just flipped past yet another VH1 program about beautiful people the other day. A super model was on and was talking about why she prefers guys who are considered "geeks" over the "cool guys" because they have something those cool guys wouldn't understand, an appreciation for something they wouldn't normally have in life.
Its possible. And no one's saying MJ has to be drop dead gorgeous. But she was "feeling faint" gorgeous and was on a higher level of popularity than Peter could ever hope to be in highschool. Its just how it was. We'd never know because the movies didn't spend that much time in highschool.
Sometimes, some girls actually do consider "whats on the inside". During highschool? No, not really. College? Maybe, after college? Well, Peter's lucky seeing how he's never had an impressive, steady career. But then again, maybe that didn't matter to MJ. I'd say Peter's passion and sense of direction in life attracted all of those girls to him (sadly we only see two of those girls, MJ, and Betty Brant).
spider-jide
10-14-2005, 05:00 AM
The fact is they're not trying to make Kirsten drop-dead gorgeous because in reality, what are the chances of a perfect Heidi Klum-esque model wanting to hook up with Peter? Not very good. They wanted MJ to be more girl next door so people can relate to her and for her relationship with Peter to be more realistic, and I like it that way. People need to accept this isn't the comics. And no I don't think Kirsten is drop-dead gorgeous, but anyone who thinks she's a dog hasn't seen Rosie O'Donnell or that bony chocolate cake girl or any other truly ugly actress. People just call Kirsten ugly b/c they're biased against her off-screen personality. I agree though that she didn't look so hot in SM2, but in other movies she's at the very least pretty and I don't see how pretty=ugly. It's not like any of you guys could even get someone like Kirsten anyway.
Please, there are some serious ugly guys out there with hot girls and a lot of these guys aren't even rich.
Look at Faith Evans and Biggie Smalls, both are rich (well biggie was) and they loved each other, Faith could have any man but she loved biggie, same thing for kim as well.
Peter isn't an ugly dude either, they need to mke maguire look better and more appealing while they're at it.
As for me, I get with girls every 2 freakin days that make kirsten look like skin-****, kirsten is nothing special, she's anything.
TrueBeliever
10-14-2005, 12:42 PM
Exactly. A few less "agressive Peter" faces (like when he tried to jump the roof in the last movie?) would be nice. I almost spat out my soda with laughter when I saw that face.
And boy was it worse in IMAX format! :P
But you're right, Peter wasn't/isn't a bad looking guy (from a guy's point of view) and I've actually seen beautiful girls I know say the thought Tobey was cute (boy, did I argue that one, though it gave me a little hope...).
If beautiful people were only interested in beautiful people, then by now, the world should be filled with beautiful people.
tonytr1687
10-14-2005, 05:39 PM
Hey guys, I don't believe the whole 'beautiful girls only get with beautiful guys' idea myself. But the fact is most of the general public does, and therefore I think they made MJ less model-like and more girl next door so women could relate to her better and so people would buy into their relationship a little more. And I was wrong to say most of you couldn't get with a girl like Kirsten, but I'm just trying to make a point that just b/c Kirsten isn't drop-dead gorgeous and doesn't look like a Victoria Secret model, it doesn't mean she's ugly. I mean ppl on here (not necessarily right now with you guys, but many other boarders in the past) moan about her being ugly so much that it makes them look really shallow. Like Shallow Hal kinda shallow.
craigaat
10-14-2005, 06:47 PM
I think they picked Dunst because she was the best out of the actresses who auditioned for the role.
tonytr1687
10-14-2005, 07:14 PM
I think they picked Dunst because she was the best out of the actresses who auditioned for the role.
Well yeah that too. I don't get why all these ppl think Alicia Witt would've been better. I mean yeah Kirsten isn't the best actress but at least she's decent and does decent-to-good movies most of the time. What has Alicia Witt done?
spider-jide
10-17-2005, 06:06 AM
I think they picked Dunst because she was the best out of the actresses who auditioned for the role.
Thats not saying much. Many of the hot/good actresses who were in line for the role weren't interested at all. Kate Hudson was the studio's first choice but she didn't want to do it. Those who auditioned for the role were probably a bunch of part time waitress nobodies, KD was a last resort for a familiar actress to play the role.
KD was a last resort for a familiar actress to play the role.
we have nothing bordering on enough information to support that statement. We only know about the actresses that have come to be known to have auditioned/been considered/offered due to incidental press/articles here and there. The filmmakers and studio never published a complete list or anything.
Jason Martell
10-17-2005, 07:31 AM
Hey guys, I don't believe the whole 'beautiful girls only get with beautiful guys' idea myself. But the fact is most of the general public does, and therefore I think they made MJ less model-like and more girl next door so women could relate to her better and so people would buy into their relationship a little more. And I was wrong to say most of you couldn't get with a girl like Kirsten, but I'm just trying to make a point that just b/c Kirsten isn't drop-dead gorgeous and doesn't look like a Victoria Secret model, it doesn't mean she's ugly. I mean ppl on here (not necessarily right now with you guys, but many other boarders in the past) moan about her being ugly so much that it makes them look really shallow. Like Shallow Hal kinda shallow.
what a coincedence MJ is the girl next door, and it works perfectly. I agree with you. I think it's even better, without her being drop dead gorgeous. After all Peter's not drop dead gorgeous.
Catman
11-06-2005, 02:57 AM
Jessica Biel is super-hot! But, she can't act, so I wouldn't want her for MJ. As for Kirsten Dunst being ugly. Well, I honestly disagree. She isn't sexy or beautiful but she is very cute. Maybe "cute" isn't what people want for MJ. They want something sexy like Jessica Biel. But whatever. I'm happy with cute. And, I think Dunst is cute.
spider-jide
11-06-2005, 11:45 AM
MJ isn't cute though. MJ is a hot tomali who should be represented by an actress who can do her looks justice.
Catman
11-06-2005, 12:24 PM
Well, Rachel McAdams is pretty hot and can act as well.
Demogoblin
11-06-2005, 01:20 PM
Jessica Biel is super-hot! But, she can't act, so I wouldn't want her for MJ. As for Kirsten Dunst being ugly. Well, I honestly disagree. She isn't sexy or beautiful but she is very cute. Maybe "cute" isn't what people want for MJ. They want something sexy like Jessica Biel. But whatever. I'm happy with cute. And, I think Dunst is cute.
I dont know about Biel's acting ability, but I totally agree with the rest of what you said. :up:
mrvlknight21
11-06-2005, 04:49 PM
McAdams would be a great replacement for Dunst, I hate Dunst and wish she had never been cast in the fiirst place. Im for it.
Catman
11-06-2005, 05:26 PM
I dont know about Biel's acting ability
Have you seen Blade:Trinity or any of the other crap Biel has done? She really can't act. But, she's hot though. Maybe there's Playboy in her future.
Hiruu
11-07-2005, 03:24 PM
Rachel McAdams can act???
LarryLegend
11-07-2005, 04:27 PM
MJ is supposed to be a Super Model. Dunst aint that. In fact she's gone from cute in SM to fruggly in recent pictures.
Hiruu
11-07-2005, 09:56 PM
MJ is supposed to be a Super Model. Dunst aint that. In fact she's gone from cute in SM to fruggly in recent pictures.
It's the drugs man, it's the drugs! :)
Catman
11-07-2005, 10:11 PM
Rachel McAdams can act???
Indeed she can.
OutcryX
11-07-2005, 11:22 PM
Rachel McAdams is awesome...nothing against Alba(smoking fire hot) but McAdams woulda rocked as Sue Storm.......she would be good as MJ too
Spider-X
11-08-2005, 12:21 PM
i'd definitely go for her as MJ :up:
total hotness...dimples, and a great actress.
Hiruu
11-08-2005, 09:02 PM
Indeed she can.
What has she been in? I'd never heard of her until I read that she had tried to get Sue Storm.
tonytr1687
11-09-2005, 02:01 AM
What has she been in? I'd never heard of her until I read that she had tried to get Sue Storm.
Wow. Where have you been? Every movie she's been in has been a hit: Mean Girls, The Notebook, Wedding Crashers, Red Eye. She's on a serious roll and I think she'll replace Jennifer Garner as "the next Julia Roberts."
I don't mind Kirsten Dunst b/c I think she's pretty enough (never been a fan of the supermodel-esque MJ) but if they have to recast after 3 I say get McAdams. She's perfect and she looks good with red hair.
LarryLegend
11-12-2005, 11:01 AM
Yeah MJ wasn't always the supermodel but she always looked much better than Dunst.
tonytr1687
11-13-2005, 06:26 PM
Yeah MJ wasn't always the supermodel but she always looked much better than Dunst.
Well it's a comic book...everyone looks perfect.
Demogoblin
11-14-2005, 03:06 PM
Another good pic of her, kind of as a redhead.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/rockgoddesspics/000a1a1a1a1a1a1amovierachawa5.jpg
Surprisingly, Kirsten is taller than Rachel. She is 5'7'', Rachel is 5'5'' and MJ is 5'8''.
Rachel
http://imdb.com/name/nm1046097/bio
Kirsten
http://imdb.com/name/nm0000379/bio
MJ
http://spiderfan.org/characters/mary_jane.html
Phoebe Dark
11-15-2005, 03:42 PM
She looks very Gwenish.
Kirsten Dunst may/might have been 'cute' But MJ isn't 'cute.'
MJ is supposed to be hotter than a 2 dollar pistol.
tonytr1687
11-15-2005, 05:51 PM
She looks very Gwenish.
Kirsten Dunst may/might have been 'cute' But MJ isn't 'cute.'
MJ is supposed to be hotter than a 2 dollar pistol.
And your point is...
Kirsten not being uber-gorgeous didn't change her character at all. She was still a model and an actress so it doesn't really matter. As long as she's attractive by Hollywood standards and Kirsten is, otherwise she wouldn't have even been cast as the love interest, not to mention in her countless other roles.
Catman
11-15-2005, 11:58 PM
Another good pic of her, kind of as a redhead.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/rockgoddesspics/000a1a1a1a1a1a1amovierachawa5.jpg
I LOVE her.
Demogoblin
11-16-2005, 12:11 AM
I LOVE her.
BACK OFF. :mad:
You already are married to Heidi Klum. I saw Rachel first. :o
avatarblade2000
11-16-2005, 01:43 PM
Wasn't she one of the original choices anyway? If she wasn't, she ought to have been. :mad: I'd have picked her over Kirsten. Shoulda, woulda, coulda.
Chris Wallace
11-16-2005, 05:03 PM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/red_eye/_group_photos/rachel_mcadams1.jpg
How about McAdams for Spider-Man 4? :down
Catman
11-17-2005, 01:12 AM
BACK OFF. :mad:
You already are married to Heidi Klum. I saw Rachel first. :o
All right. All right. You can keep Rachel. lol.
Demogoblin
11-21-2005, 02:09 PM
All right. All right. You can keep Rachel. lol.
Thanks. :D :up:
LarryLegend
11-21-2005, 06:25 PM
Rachel would have been a better choice than Kirsten. Heck there are a ton of actresses who would have been better choices.
Catman
11-25-2005, 08:50 PM
So much hate for Dunst.
javi1024
11-26-2005, 12:21 PM
i dont really think shes all that pretty. maybe jessica biel could work.
http://www.uknet.net/showcase/Signedpics/jessica_biel1.sized.jpg
Yeah I would of went with Jessica Biel or Nikki Cox.
LarryLegend
11-26-2005, 06:13 PM
Biel would have been killer.
Mr. Socko
11-26-2005, 09:16 PM
I dun like her that much.
Catman
11-27-2005, 12:19 AM
Jessica Biel has a great body, but little acting skills. So the answer is no! At least Rachel can act.
TrueBeliever
11-30-2005, 08:15 PM
She sure can. :)
Catman
12-02-2005, 04:48 AM
Yeah, she's done a good job of playing a variety of roles.
Catman
12-18-2005, 08:51 PM
Pics from McAdam's new film, The Family Stone:
http://gallery.rachel-mcadams.com/albums/familystone/set02.jpeg
http://gallery.rachel-mcadams.com/albums/familystone/normal_011.jpg
http://gallery.rachel-mcadams.com/albums/familystonehq/normal_004.jpg
MJ doesn't have hairy nipples.
Catman
12-18-2005, 10:30 PM
You don't know that!
LarryLegend
12-20-2005, 01:42 PM
Are you saying McAdams does?
Are you saying McAdams does?
Yes
LarryLegend
12-20-2005, 03:18 PM
Whatever dude.
What kind of a loser has a John Stamos avvy?
Whatever dude.
What kind of a loser has a John Stamos avvy?
Uncle Jesse is on of the coolest fictional characters ever you unable-to-detect-irony douche.
LarryLegend
12-20-2005, 06:07 PM
Uncle Jesse is on of the coolest fictional characters ever you unable-to-detect-irony douche.
Irony. Sorry not what I see. But to the topic at hand, how do you know McAdams has hairy nipples, ya seen them?
Irony. Sorry not what I see. But to the topic at hand, how do you know McAdams has hairy nipples, ya seen them?
Yes, I have seen Rachel McAdams nipple.
LarryLegend
12-20-2005, 07:08 PM
Yes, I have seen Rachel McAdams nipple.
Where a dream?
Where a dream?
No, not a dream, dips hit (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=mcadams+hairy+nipple)
Catman
12-28-2005, 04:42 AM
Here's another pic:
http://img420.imageshack.us/img420/4744/023hk.th.jpg
and
http://i24.imagethrust.com/t/42239/rachelmcadams0704ao.jpg
Prisoner 655321
12-28-2005, 09:19 AM
I love Rachel McAdams. I would love to see her in any geek movie. How about if Superman Returns doesn't suck she could play Lana Lang in a sequel?
Catman
12-29-2005, 02:52 AM
I'm sure she'll make a good Lana as well.
Catman
05-25-2006, 09:56 AM
Time to bring this baby back!
The Kid
05-25-2006, 03:00 PM
hairy nipples?
TheFlyinRussian
05-25-2006, 03:56 PM
I'm sorry but I hate replacing actors/actresses in movie franchises.In a movie you're supposed to believe that the actor is that person and if they're replaced in a sequel it just makes me feel alienated.And stop bashing Dunst,sure the actresses you guys listed are better looking,but any of you would do her if you had the chance.
Abaddon
05-25-2006, 04:44 PM
http://gallery.rachel-mcadams.com/albums/familystonehq/normal_004.jpg
MJ!:eek:
LongDong
05-26-2006, 08:53 PM
She is a way better choice than butt ass ugly dunst
Catman
05-27-2006, 01:34 AM
http://gallery.rachel-mcadams.com/albums/familystonehq/normal_004.jpg
MJ!:eek:
There ya go!
seattlespidey
05-29-2006, 02:31 PM
Isn't she like 8 years older than Kirsten Dunst?
If they replace Toby and Kirsten for a new few movies, which I think they should after SM3, (or atleast I think they should also replace Tobey when they inevitably replace the inevitably gone Kirsten) they're going to go with actors a few years younger to keep them going at around the same age, not a decade older than they already had.
She looks pretty good when dolled up, but she's really in the same average league as Kirsten, all together. Maybe a better face, but a much inferior body. And I believe shorter (less model like).
I think they should make the next trilogy a couple of years down the road. Parker in his older days is pretty interesting and that would mean different actors would work out fine.
As for me, I'd like to stick with everyone they've had. I'm tired of series changing up their actors.
seattlespidey
05-29-2006, 02:31 PM
I'm sorry but I hate replacing actors/actresses in movie franchises.In a movie you're supposed to believe that the actor is that person and if they're replaced in a sequel it just makes me feel alienated.And stop bashing Dunst,sure the actresses you guys listed are better looking,but any of you would do her if you had the chance.
Agreed. :up:
tamron
05-29-2006, 03:33 PM
And stop bashing Dunst,sure the actresses you guys listed are better looking,but any of you would do her if you had the chance.
Why, just b/c she's famous? Call me crazy, but I wouldn't do Dunst if I had the chance, b/c I just don't find her attractive.
Jack O'Lantern
05-29-2006, 08:17 PM
Here's another pic:
http://img420.imageshack.us/img420/4744/023hk.th.jpg
Thats definitely MJ. :up: I would love for this to happen.
Catman
05-30-2006, 10:43 PM
Me too, man! I hope Sony is really checking out these boards!
The Flea
05-31-2006, 02:01 PM
My choice aswell. MJ should actually be hot...
TwilightPro101
06-02-2006, 07:43 PM
She's defintely a prospective and much better replacement. I'd like to see her posing.
Image
06-02-2006, 08:01 PM
I prefer Rachel McAdams as MJ!
Spider-Fan83
06-02-2006, 08:44 PM
Here's a quick one i made of her with red hair and i throw in her classic purple and yellow cloth
http://f5.putfile.com/6/15220421657.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/)
Abaddon
06-02-2006, 08:56 PM
The Redheaded Goblin!!:eek:
spideyboy_1111
06-03-2006, 07:20 AM
Here's a quick one i made of her with red hair and i throw in her classic purple and yellow cloth
http://f5.putfile.com/6/15220421657.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/)
lol her classic? lol dude more like classic as in animated series only :down what an ugly out fit that she never changed.. and her fugly cow boy boots
Catman
06-06-2006, 06:49 PM
Good manip, dude.
halfapple
06-07-2006, 04:06 PM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/red_eye/_group_photos/rachel_mcadams1.jpg
How about McAdams for Spider-Man 4?
She can act and also very pretty.
maxmccumber
06-12-2006, 09:46 PM
Here's a quick one i made of her with red hair and i throw in her classic purple and yellow cloth
http://f5.putfile.com/6/15220421657.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/)
Not a bad choice, but still, she's NOT a real redhead. Then again, there aren't too many ginger chicks out there right now who would be the right age for MJ. Whatever happens, they will probably need to find someone new soon because I read somewhere a while ago that Dunst doesn't want to keep doing it after #3. Maguire might not be back for #4 either if its true that he and his new wife are expecting their first child. I don't know about Sam Raimi and if he still wants to direct.....
LarryLegend
06-12-2006, 10:13 PM
She's 30 so they won't cast her. Good choice imho, can act and is pretty.
Abaddon
06-12-2006, 10:14 PM
She's 30????Get the **** out of here!:eek:
LarryLegend
06-12-2006, 10:16 PM
She's 30????Get the **** out of here!:eek:
Born in 1976. She's older than me.
Abaddon
06-12-2006, 10:19 PM
****ing crazy
FaT_tONle
06-12-2006, 11:21 PM
That's the only problem I got with these older woman... not their looks... their age... you really need to keep the female lead under 28 if they make sequels...
LarryLegend
06-12-2006, 11:22 PM
Well actually her birthday is in October so she's only 29.
Catman
06-16-2006, 12:29 PM
She may be 29 but she looks way younger. Lindsay Lohan was like 17 during Mean Girls and they both looked around the same age. To me anyway!
FaT_tONle
06-16-2006, 12:33 PM
She may be 29 but she looks way younger. Lindsay Lohan was like 17 during Mean Girls and they both looked around the same age. To me anyway!
More like 31 when SM4 films... if that... I just hope SM3 is it now that Venom is probably dead... I'd love to see Lizard or w/e but not with new casts... at least not in a while...
JeanGrey12
06-20-2006, 10:33 AM
rachel mcadams is one of my fav actresses. i think she ooks more liek mary jane than kirsten does. my only concern is i dont like when they change up actors mid-series...
Jean Grey is the coolest!:xmen:
NinjaTurtleFan
07-17-2006, 12:26 AM
I know it's too early in the game to tell if she'll return or not and money is the source to keeping contracts/breaking contracts, but if Kirsten were not to return than I'd bring in natural redhead Rachel McAdams to play Mary Jane.
Even though I've always seen her playing Barbara Gordon in the future Batman sequels, I do think however she'd make a good MJ. :)
Untilteld
07-17-2006, 12:31 AM
There's a perfect place where this can be posted, Spider-Man Sequels.
Where's my pal DOG LIPS with his kick-a$$ avvy?
FaT_tONle
07-17-2006, 12:31 AM
Oh cmon... close this... look in the sequel forums... (she's too old by the way... early thirties by SM4)
DOG LIPS
07-17-2006, 12:32 AM
Moving to Sequels...
FaT_tONle
07-17-2006, 12:35 AM
Moving to Sequels...
CLose it we had a thread bout her their already...
Shadow_Knight
07-17-2006, 08:45 AM
If Racheal Mcadams played MJ I would like that alot I don't like Dunst as MJ.
nolan's roll'n
07-17-2006, 09:04 AM
If Racheal Mcadams played MJ I would like that alot I don't like Dunst as MJ.
Yeah, McAdams is a better actress too.
Shadow_Knight
07-17-2006, 12:35 PM
I agree with you completely.
xii22_loop
07-19-2006, 02:13 PM
heck, Rachel McAdams could even pull off Blackcat
Catman
07-22-2006, 03:15 AM
I prefer McAdams as MJ then Black Cat.
Shadow_Knight
07-22-2006, 10:42 AM
You think she could play Black Cat I don't think she could well anyone could you just have to play them right and I don't think Rachel McAdams can play Black Cat.
Catman
08-27-2006, 09:52 PM
Rachel McAdams is an amazing actress and can definitly do a great job performing Black Cat. I just prefer her playing MJ since it suits her better.
spideyman101
08-27-2006, 11:05 PM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/red_eye/_group_photos/rachel_mcadams1.jpg
How about McAdams for Spider-Man 4?
she'd be PERFECT!!!
i just saw Red Eye a few weeks ago, btw. :P
GhostRider5006
08-28-2006, 12:01 AM
My Big sis would be a good mJ
8Ball2/JanG5
08-28-2006, 01:04 AM
Rachel Mcadams is Fing beautiful.
She gets nudey in the first film she's ever been in, an Italian film called "My Name is Tanino." :o
Frodo
08-30-2006, 02:35 AM
I think she'd be good. I just saw Red Eye . She's got a great smile:O
Catman
09-26-2006, 09:17 AM
She gets nudey in the first film she's ever been in, an Italian film called "My Name is Tanino." :o
I know. You don't even have to watch the movie. You can get the photos on google.
Catman
12-03-2006, 04:49 PM
Seems like Dunst won't return for part 4, so time to bring back my thread!
tamron
12-03-2006, 08:44 PM
Latino Review is saying McAdams is being courted for Pepper Potts in Iron Man. So she might get a in Marvel franchise after all.
Catman
12-03-2006, 11:16 PM
Fantastic :up:
kansas boy
12-07-2006, 01:36 PM
I agree, she would make a fantastic MJ
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v640/JohnDylan6/rachel_mcadams.jpg
Catman
12-07-2006, 02:53 PM
http://www.celebritywonder.com/mp/2002_The_Hot_Chick/HC_Rachel_McAdams_057.jpg
Catman
12-19-2006, 11:13 PM
If she ends up being considered then they should sign her up as soon as possible. If they wait till 2007 she will be a huge star and wouldn't want to do it. Right now her star is rising, so they should do it now. I'm pretty sure Dunst isn't going to return for the fourth installment.
WOW! I did a good job predicting! :woot: We are almost in 2007 and McAdams is up for both Iron Man and Dark Knight so she may not be MJ.
Demogoblin
12-20-2006, 10:26 PM
WOW! I did a good job predicting! :woot: We are almost in 2007 and McAdams is up for both Iron Man and Dark Knight so she may not be MJ.
Really? Nice. The more of Rachel around, the better. :woot:
Catman
12-20-2006, 11:40 PM
Yup :)
Catman
01-17-2007, 12:46 PM
McAdams wasn't cast in Iron Man, so that still gives her a shot for Spidey 4. :)
Demogoblin
01-17-2007, 09:43 PM
Boo ya! :woot: *drools*
Catman
01-17-2007, 11:43 PM
I'm glad someone else is happy. :)
shatterstar4ml
01-18-2007, 02:16 AM
McAdams in SM4 would make many men extremely happy. Kirsten Dunst is not a good actress at all. The first two SM were worse because she was in them. There's something about the way she ***** her head when she talks that really @##$$ ticks me off.
Demogoblin
01-18-2007, 01:57 PM
I have nothing against Dunst, I just like McAdams better. :yay: Then again, few can live up to McAdams. (Jessica Biel, Vida Guerra and Cate Beckinsale are the few exceptions)
Catman
01-20-2007, 06:19 PM
I have nothing against Dunst, I just like McAdams better. :yay: Then again, few can live up to McAdams. (Jessica Biel, Vida Guerra and Cate Beckinsale are the few exceptions)
I like Dunst as well. But, McAdams may be an improvement in the acting and looks department. While a downgrade in the breast department. :o
kevinpenni
01-20-2007, 06:53 PM
Kirsten Dunst > Rachel McAdams :cmad:
Atleast Kirsten doesn't have hairy nipples! :p
Catman
01-20-2007, 07:39 PM
Atleast Kirsten doesn't have hairy nipples! :p
Not this again! :cmad: Dude, I like Dunst as well, but I'll be the first to admit that McAdams is ten times the actress that she is.
Visionary
01-20-2007, 08:35 PM
I'm going to have to say no to Rachel McAdams, and to any other actress in Mean Girls. I really do hate young Hollywood. :dry:
Catman
01-21-2007, 12:23 AM
^ Rachel McAdams is NOTHING like Lindsay Lohan! Comparing McAdams to Lohan is like comparing Matthew Broderick to the Brat Pack.
kevinpenni
01-21-2007, 12:23 AM
Not this again! :cmad: Dude, I like Dunst as well, but I'll be the first to admit that McAdams is ten times the actress that she is.
I don't agree... Rachel hasn't even been in that many films, she's a good actress -- but she hasn't proven herself, IMO.
Dunst has done many excellent roles, and has been applauded by critics for films including The Virgin Suicides, Marie Antoinette, Crazy/Beautiful, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Mona Lisa Smile, Wimbledon and Elizabethtown.
kevinpenni
01-21-2007, 12:24 AM
^ Rachel McAdams is NOTHING like Lindsay Lohan! Comparing McAdams to Lohan is like comparing Matthew Broderick to the Brat Pack.
Yeah, Rachel McAdams is nothing like Linsday Lohan. She's a million times better.
Catman
01-21-2007, 12:26 AM
I don't agree... Rachel hasn't even been in that many films, she's a good actress -- but she hasn't proven herself, IMO.
Dunst has done many excellent roles, and has been applauded by critics for films including The Virgin Suicides, Marie Antoinette, Crazy/Beautiful, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Mona Lisa Smile, Wimbledon and Elizabethtown.
Dude, I like Dunst too. But, McAdams has proven to be a verstile actress. She went from Mean Girls to Notebook to Wedding Crasher to Red Eye to Family Stone. Kirsten Dunst is a good actress, but she's always, well, Kirsten Dunst. She isn't as verstile as McAdams. Like she gave two completely different performances in Mean Girls and Wedding Crashers.
kevinpenni
01-21-2007, 12:39 AM
I'm not saying Rachels not a versatile actress or that she sucks, I think she is good.
But going from Mean Girls to Notebook to Wedding Crashers isn't very different than going from Bring it On to Crazy/Beautiful or from Mona Lisa Smile to Wimbledon to Elizabethtown to Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind to Marie Antoinette, etc.
This is just all my opinion... I don't just see Kirsten Dunst in every role she does, because a lot of her roles are different. Sometimes with bigger actors and actors who literally grew up on screen, sometimes people just see the actor and not a character, though I've never had that problem with Dunst. Have you seen Interview With the Vampire, The Virgin Suicides or the majority of the films I listed?
Catman
01-21-2007, 12:57 AM
Have you seen Interview With the Vampire, The Virgin Suicides or the majority of the films I listed?
This is gonna sound sad, but I've seen almost every single film Dunst has made. Including silly TV movies like 15 and pregnant and that Disney haunted house movie with Steve Guttenberg. :o And, to me she always plays Kirsten Dunst. I'm not saying she's a bad actress because a lot of actors basically play themselves. Like, for example, I'm a big Will Smith fan but I'll be the first to admit that he always plays himself.
Shifty
01-21-2007, 01:27 AM
This is gonna sound sad, but I've seen almost every single film Dunst has made. Including silly TV movies like 15 and pregnant and that Disney haunted house movie with Steve Guttenberg. :o And, to me she always plays Kirsten Dunst. I'm not saying she's a bad actress because a lot of actors basically play themselves. Like, for example, I'm a big Will Smith fan but I'll be the first to admit that he always plays himself.
Have you seen The Pursuit of Happyness?
Catman
01-21-2007, 01:32 AM
Have you seen The Pursuit of Happyness?
Not yet! But, one film isn't gonna make a difference. In the next film he'll be back to good ol' Fresh Prince. It's like when Ali came out. His follow-up was Men in Black II.
Shifty
01-21-2007, 01:39 AM
Not yet! But, one film isn't gonna make a difference. In the next film he'll be back to good ol' Fresh Prince. It's like when Ali came out. His follow-up was Men in Black II.
No but if you're a fan you'll really enjoy the film. Make an effort to see it.
Catman
01-21-2007, 02:11 AM
^ I agree, man!
Demogoblin
01-22-2007, 12:29 PM
I liked Lohan for MJ for a long time, but while they are both very attractive redhead partygirls, MJ has always been able to stay level headed. McAdams is much more along the lines of Mary Jane. Fun but mature. Thats why I like her. And beautiful. Lets not forget she's a stunner. :woot:
As for acting, I haven seen that many of her movies, but they do seem pretty versatile. Comedy, drama and she has even expressed interest in sci fi. She mentioned one time that she saw Thundercats on TV and would love to play Cheetara in a movie. It was in an issue of Wizard a while ago, but I dont have a link.
BTW Catman, your avvy makes me very happy. :o
Catman
01-22-2007, 02:28 PM
^ Thank you :)
Demogoblin
01-22-2007, 10:55 PM
^ Thank you :)
Never change it. Seriously. :o
spideyboy_1111
01-22-2007, 10:59 PM
if lohan shapes up then either one could do it.... Lohan pretty much lives a parrallel life to MJ, and shes actually not a bad actor... so either one works for me... as long as there not like gloomey kirsten who hasn't acted well for years
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.