View Full Version : 10,000 Bc
Hunter Rider
10-05-2005, 04:58 AM
http://www.empireonline.co.uk/news/story.asp?NID=17170
The Day After Tomorrow director Roland Emmerich has settled on his next project, 10,000 B.C. Basically doing exactly what it says on the tin, the film will centre on a 21-year-old man member of a pre-historic tribe migrating through their homeland and slaughtering mammoth.
The script was co-written by Emmerich and his composer on Day After Tomorrow, Harald Kloser. Emmerich is looking for an unknown to play the lead (got a beard? Excess body hair? You could be famous!) and will begin casting later this month, with filming due to start in Africa in February.
Kevin Roegele
10-05-2005, 08:10 AM
Given that Day After was slightly better than Godzilla and ID4, which were complete f****** b*******, this might be, maybe, reasonably watchable, perhaps.
Caliber
10-05-2005, 09:58 AM
This sounds like 2 hours of crap.
green
10-05-2005, 10:10 AM
The script was co-written? You mean they speak?
Eh Id rather watch Raquel Welch.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v662/markofort/142766One-Million-Years-B-C.jpg
Edward Brock
10-05-2005, 01:28 PM
Man, THAT was a funny movie. Watch out for the giant, man-eating Iguana!!!
Wonder what the budget for this seemingly crashing meteor will be like.
Obsidian
10-05-2005, 01:42 PM
So...I wonder what special f/x they'll do in this movie? Dinosaurs? Ice age?
dpm07
10-05-2005, 01:49 PM
I really don't think a film like this would do well. Not in today's world. There wouldn't be any vocabulary anyone could understand, or any real purpose.
The great thing about ID4 was that it really showed what happens when leadership comes together and works to save the world from a great threat. I liked The Day After Tomorrow, because it showed the tenacity of American spirit, and how we were able to let the third world countries help us when we needed it.
WormyT
10-05-2005, 04:08 PM
Given that Day After was slightly better than Godzilla and ID4, which were complete f****** b*******, this might be, maybe, reasonably watchable, perhaps.
Don't forget Stargate and Universal Soldier, both were triumphs.
Seriously though I think The Patriot is by far Roland Emmerichs best movie.
This 10 000bc movie might be fun, but they better not be speaking english.
Excel
10-05-2005, 10:15 PM
yeah icant believe the director of GODZILLA is also the director of the patriot.
Hunter Rider
02-27-2006, 12:05 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=13355
Strait and Belle Go Back to 10,000 B.C.
Source: Variety (http://www.variety.com/)
February 27, 2006
Director Roland Emmerich (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=13355#) has set Steven Strait (Sky High) and Camilla Belle (When a Stranger Calls) to star in 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260), the period epic drama (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=13355#) that will begin shooting April 24 for a summer 2007 tentpole for Warner Bros., reports Variety.
Emmerich's Centropolis partner Michael Wimer is producing with Mark Gordon. Legendary Pictures is co-financing, and its chairman-CEO, Thomas Tull, is executive producing along with Harald Kloser and Tom Karnowski. Warner Bros. will distribute worldwide.
Strait will play a youngster far down in the pecking order of a primitive tribe that survives by hunting migrating mammoth. He pines for a princess well above his station. When the tribe's hunters are enslaved and the princess kidnapped, the boy realizes his tribe is headed for extinction unless he takes action.
Emmerich wrote the first draft with Kloser, his musical composer on The Day After Tomorrow (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=13355#). Their ambition was to illustrate three stages of primitive man. The most recent draft was done by Robert Rodat, who worked with both Emmerich and Gordon on The Patriot, and with Gordon on Saving Private Ryan (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=13355#). The dialogue will be English language.
The film will shoot in South Africa and Namibia.
Wilhelm-Scream
02-27-2006, 12:11 PM
I would never make a prehistoric man movie. :confused:
Either they go for realism and then you have to sit through 2 hours of grunting and chimp-talk, or they speak in English which is supremely retarded.
Sounds quite boring also.
jaguarr
02-27-2006, 12:53 PM
Warren Peace as a caveman, directed by the guy who brought us the American version of Godzilla. Ummm....yeah....I think I'll rent something else instead...
jag
Darthphere
02-27-2006, 01:04 PM
What is Camilla Belle doing to her career? :(
jaguarr
02-27-2006, 01:10 PM
What is Camilla Belle doing to her career? :(
Setting herself up for a natural transition to hardcore porn? :confused:
jag
C.F. Kane
02-27-2006, 01:24 PM
At least ID4 was entertaining.
The rest of his films are tripe though
Wilhelm-Scream
02-27-2006, 01:25 PM
Independance Day is worth it just for Jeff Goldblum's triumphant, cigar-smoking swagger at the end. He walks like a supermodel, hilarious.
There's one guy with his name written all over this role
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/twentieth_century_fox/dodgeball__a_true_underdog_story/frankie_muniz/dodgepreg.jpg
Mr. Credible
02-27-2006, 06:23 PM
wow... why all the Godzilla hating? i really like that movie.
hm, to each his own, i suppose.
KALEL114
03-01-2006, 09:32 PM
wow... why all the Godzilla hating? i really like that movie.
hm, to each his own, i suppose.
Just read the 94 script. It would of been 10000 times better.
WalkingDead
03-01-2006, 09:46 PM
Just read the 94 script. It would of been 10000 times better.
Can you link to said 94 script please?
KALEL114
03-01-2006, 09:54 PM
Can you link to said 94 script please?
pm me and i'll send it to you.
primemover
03-01-2006, 10:22 PM
So...I wonder what special f/x they'll do in this movie? Dinosaurs? Ice age?
Dinosaus were long gone by the time humans entered the scene, and when I say long gone I mean like 60+ million years before. So don't expect any Dinosaurs unless the movie is sci-fi.
The last ice age receded around 10,000 years ago, so it could very well take place during the recession.
Also, 10,000 B.C isn't too far back to think that these people would only be grunting, as language is believed to be around for much longer. So as for them speaking english, if you can believe any movie that has foriegn characters speaking english, ie Red October, then I can't see why cavemen speaking english would be a big stretch. this is a movie afterall, not a history text. I imagine the best technique would be some proto-language with captions, or perhaps just go the Passion of the Christ route, like The Quest for Fire.
Obsidian
03-01-2006, 10:34 PM
Dinosaus were long gone by the time humans entered the scene, and when I say long gone I mean like 60+ million years before. So don't expect any Dinosaurs unless the movie is sci-fi.
Who knows? Emmerich might just choose to include dinosaurs because it sounds cool:(
LetsHangBendis
03-01-2006, 10:39 PM
I really don't think a film like this would do well. Not in today's world. There wouldn't be any vocabulary anyone could understand, or any real purpose.
The great thing about ID4 was that it really showed what happens when leadership comes together and works to save the world from a great threat. I liked The Day After Tomorrow, because it showed the tenacity of American spirit, and how we were able to let the third world countries help us when we needed it.But leadership never comes together for any reason and the American Spirit isn't as tenacious as we'd like to believe. His movies are preachy bull **** and it's flat out dangerous to even consider them based in some kind of realism.
We AREN'T willing to let the third world help us and they shouldn't have to. Ever. We're just stupid enough however to fall for all the things he predicts. It really sickens me to watch a Roland Emmerich movie, because the first act, when everyone is a selfish douche, is dead on realistic. Then it gets stupid.
Red Mask
03-01-2006, 10:51 PM
Wait a minute. I read in National Geographic that pre-historic man really didn't hunt mammoths. Something about a huge gap between when they existed.
primemover
03-02-2006, 01:33 AM
Might have read that wrong, Humans and Mammoths definately existed at the same time.
Red Mask
03-02-2006, 02:48 AM
What about the sabretooth tiger? I'm sure it was about one of those animals.
primemover
03-02-2006, 02:57 AM
Nah, Sabretooths were around, maybe you are thinking of the Dinosaurs?
Red Mask
03-02-2006, 03:45 AM
Okay here it is. National Geographic vol. 198, no. 1, July 2000.
Researchers have questioned the traditional image of what anthropologist Olga Soffer calls the "macho, Hemingwayesque big-game hunter". She and other scholars believe that very few of the huge mammoths were stalked and killed but rather that most were scavenged after dying of natural causes. The discovery of meshlike-impressions on clay fragments in Pavlov Hills also leads to speculation that family members set nets for catching small game like hares, foxes, and squirrels.
GoldGoblin
03-02-2006, 05:29 AM
Dinosaus were long gone by the time humans entered the scene, and when I say long gone I mean like 60+ million years before. So don't expect any Dinosaurs unless the movie is sci-fi.
The last ice age receded around 10,000 years ago, so it could very well take place during the recession.
Also, 10,000 B.C isn't too far back to think that these people would only be grunting, as language is believed to be around for much longer. So as for them speaking english, if you can believe any movie that has foriegn characters speaking english, ie Red October, then I can't see why cavemen speaking english would be a big stretch. this is a movie afterall, not a history text. I imagine the best technique would be some proto-language with captions, or perhaps just go the Passion of the Christ route, like The Quest for Fire.
^So we won't see any dinosaurs,just a bunch of cavemen grunting with subtitles?Sounds so boring.
DACrowe
03-02-2006, 12:02 PM
Wow he gets progressively worse!
First we get Stargate which is average but entertaining sci-fi schlock (a rental).
Then we get ID4 which is cheesy crap, but emmensly entertaining and while ripping off every movie ever made leaves you with a smile on your face....albeit if you see it again it continually gets worse and worse as a P.O.S. then so forth.
We get Godzilla which was crap. A few cool scenes and a great marketing team and a half decent cast, but pure trite.
Then we get The Patriot which takes a **** on history and is so bad with its unintentional attempts at being patriotic and moving. We're talking Green Berets crap here.
Then The Day After Tomorrow, arguably the worst disaster movie ever made (for the big screen). Complete with crappy diologue, undeveloped cliches, pretentious political messages that a 5 year old would already know, pathetic attempts at political satire and every cliche thrown in there in the book including a cancer kid who is just there to make Sela Ward seem heroic while she just sits there the whole movie....oy and again godd actors are wasted in this movie.
So how can he top the crapfest that was The Day After Tomorrow? Oh I know, a prehistoric movie that will probably feature dionsaurs and other such bull**** reminding us of those '60s B-Hammer movies, eh?
What a hack.
terry78
03-02-2006, 12:06 PM
^Yet we're all still going to go see it, simply because it would be the first serious movie about early man.
Wilhelm-Scream
03-02-2006, 12:09 PM
Clan of the Cavebear was serious.
terry78
03-02-2006, 12:11 PM
Vaguely, yeah.
primemover
03-02-2006, 12:24 PM
^So we won't see any dinosaurs,just a bunch of cavemen grunting with subtitles?Sounds so boring.
Rent 'Quest for Fire' and see how just this can make a very compelling movie, and hey for all you geeks, this is Hellboy's first movie!! :)
primemover
03-02-2006, 12:25 PM
^Yet we're all still going to go see it, simply because it would be the first serious movie about early man.
Quest for Fire was very serious.
Darthphere
03-02-2006, 01:22 PM
Wow he gets progressively worse!
First we get Stargate which is average but entertaining sci-fi schlock (a rental).
Then we get ID4 which is cheesy crap, but emmensly entertaining and while ripping off every movie ever made leaves you with a smile on your face....albeit if you see it again it continually gets worse and worse as a P.O.S. then so forth.
We get Godzilla which was crap. A few cool scenes and a great marketing team and a half decent cast, but pure trite.
Then we get The Patriot which takes a **** on history and is so bad with its unintentional attempts at being patriotic and moving. We're talking Green Berets crap here.
Then The Day After Tomorrow, arguably the worst disaster movie ever made (for the big screen). Complete with crappy diologue, undeveloped cliches, pretentious political messages that a 5 year old would already know, pathetic attempts at political satire and every cliche thrown in there in the book including a cancer kid who is just there to make Sela Ward seem heroic while she just sits there the whole movie....oy and again godd actors are wasted in this movie.
So how can he top the crapfest that was The Day After Tomorrow? Oh I know, a prehistoric movie that will probably feature dionsaurs and other such bull**** reminding us of those '60s B-Hammer movies, eh?
What a hack.
Man I thought I got lost on the internet but saw opinions being thrown out as facts and I knew I was at the Hype. Thanks.:up:
Hoedowned
03-02-2006, 01:35 PM
Jeez. Look's like i'm the only one who feels like watching a caveman flick.
The Lizard
03-02-2006, 02:05 PM
This is a waste of time --- the ultimate caveman flick has already been made...
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00029RDVS.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
http://www.todoelcine.com/screencaptures/Caveman2.jpg
"Atook alunda Lana....zug-zug!" :up:
terry78
03-02-2006, 02:06 PM
^That T-Rex needs the south beach diet, stat.
WarBlade
03-02-2006, 04:58 PM
Wait a minute. I read in National Geographic that pre-historic man really didn't hunt mammoths. Something about a huge gap between when they existed.
There are examples of mamoth bones that appear to have been broken by stone age people. There are cave paintings of mamoths and we know that people were roaming the land well before 10,000 years ago when the classic woolly mamoth sub-species died out. Maybe the article you read mentions some early ancestor of the mamoth that predated mankind?
Red Mask
03-03-2006, 09:16 PM
Read the post I have above.
The Phantom
03-03-2006, 09:33 PM
As much as I'd like to join the crowd, I'd have to say that I liked Godzilla, ID4, and Day After Tomorrow quite bit. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that ID4 was my "Star Wars" before I actually saw Star Wars.
While not the most interesting time period in my opinion, it sounds pretty exciting, although it sounds a lot more like a Discovery Channel Documentary than a movie.
Red Mask
03-03-2006, 09:50 PM
What's this? People are now starting to hate "ID4"? When did that happen? I remember when people were going ape all over it.
Excel
03-03-2006, 11:45 PM
id was the second biggst movie everin 96.
with inflation its domestic grossbeats spiderman and worldwide beats returnof the king.
its 300 u.s./500 over seas is 400/700 nowadays
Red Mask
03-04-2006, 07:19 AM
While not the most interesting time period in my opinion, it sounds pretty exciting, although it sounds a lot more like a Discovery Channel Documentary than a movie.
Discovery Channel has some good programs. :up:
Hunter Rider
05-09-2006, 03:14 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14448
Principal Photography Begins on 10,000 B.C.
Source: Warner Bros. Pictures
May 9, 2006
The epic adventure 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260), directed by Roland Emmerich (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14448#) (Independence Day (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14448#), The Day After Tomorrow (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14448#)) and starring Steven Strait (Sky High) and Camilla Belle (When a Stranger Calls) has begun production in New Zealand for Warner Bros (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14448#). Pictures in association with Legendary Pictures. The announcement was made today by Jeff Robinov, President of Production, Warner Bros. Pictures.
It was a time when man and beast were untamed and the mighty mammoth roamed the earth. A time when ideas and beliefs were born that forever shaped mankind. 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260) follows a young hunter (Steven Strait) on his quest to lead an army across a vast desert, battling saber tooth tigers and prehistoric predators as he unearths a lost civilization and attempts to rescue the woman he loves (Camilla Belle) from an evil warlord determined to possess her.
A Centropolis Entertainment production of a Roland Emmerich film, 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260) is directed by Roland Emmerich from a screenplay by Emmerich & Harald Kloser, and is produced by Michael Wimer (Welcome to America), Roland Emmerich and Mark Gordon (The Day After Tomorrow (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=14448#)). The executive producers are Tom Karnowski (Everything is Illuminated), Harald Kloser, Thomas Tull (Superman Returns) and Bill Fay. The co-producer is Ossie von Richthofen (Welcome to America). The director of photography is Ueli Steiger (The Day After Tomorrow), and the production is designed by Jean Vincent Puzos (Lord of War). The film is being edited by Alex Berner (Perfume: The Story of a Murderer). The composer is Harald Kloser (The Day After Tomorrow). Costumes will be designed by Odile *****-Mireaux (The Constant Gardener).
10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260) will shoot on location in New Zealand, South Africa and Namibia and will be distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company.
Dr. Fate
05-09-2006, 04:18 PM
Given that Day After was slightly better than Godzilla and ID4, which were complete f****** b*******, this might be, maybe, reasonably watchable, perhaps.
I liked ID4 :mad:. Godzilla was crap though, I won't argue there.
So Emmerich is going the Quest For Fire route?
Unleashed
05-09-2006, 10:12 PM
I liked Godzilla, Day After Tomorrow, ID4, and Stargate :(
Unleashed
05-09-2006, 10:13 PM
Just read the 94 script. It would of been 10000 times better.
link?
Excel
05-09-2006, 10:39 PM
chiaaaaa
chi-boy
05-09-2006, 10:43 PM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/screen_gems/when_a_stranger_calls/camilla_belle/strangercalls2.jpg
Does that mean she'll be running around in a skimpy cavewoman bikini???
logansoldcigar
05-10-2006, 07:36 AM
I really don't think a film like this would do well. Not in today's world. There wouldn't be any vocabulary anyone could understand, or any real purpose.
The great thing about ID4 was that it really showed what happens when leadership comes together and works to save the world from a great threat. I liked The Day After Tomorrow, because it showed the tenacity of American spirit, and how we were able to let the third world countries help us when we needed it.
Thats right. In ID4 everyone else in the world sat on their butts and waited for the US to come up with a plan. cos thats all we do. we wait and hide under our beds until the mighty US of A comes up with idea to save our lousy skins.
and then, they generously let everyone help them when their own land is a frozen wasteland.
I thought both movies were actualyy documentaries, they were so true to life.
thealiasman2000
05-10-2006, 07:45 AM
1-Aren't cavewomen supposed to be big, burly, manly woman?
Camilla Belle hardly fits the bill.
What about Lucy Lawless, Chyna, Julie Strain or Grace Jones?
2-Wouldn't this work better as a comedy?
Most cavemen movies I've seen were comedies: "The Flintstones", "Brother Bear", "Ice Age"...
3-You do realize that if they don't speak English, you won't understand a thing that they say?
The cavemen in "Brother Bear" spoke English.
4-NO DINOSAURS! When will people get throught their thick heads that, when men came along, dinosaurs were already extinct!
C.F. Kane
05-10-2006, 09:29 AM
http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/screen_gems/when_a_stranger_calls/camilla_belle/strangercalls2.jpg
Does that mean she'll be running around in a skimpy cavewoman bikini???
A yes, a thespian through and through (http://camillabellesucks.ytmnd.com/)
Unleashed
05-10-2006, 04:42 PM
THEY CAN'T SPEAK ENGLISH!!!:mad:
thealiasman2000
05-10-2006, 04:47 PM
Are you saying that you speak caveman language?
terry78
05-10-2006, 04:52 PM
http://www.pureimagination.co.uk/captaincaveman/images/caveyshouttmb.jpg
green
05-10-2006, 05:03 PM
A yes, a thespian through and through (http://camillabellesucks.ytmnd.com/)
Really, you should try looking up her reviews for a Ballad of Jack and Rose where most critics agree she held her own against Daniel Day Lewis.
Unleashed
05-10-2006, 05:21 PM
Are you saying that you speak caveman language?
I don't know where you got that from.
Warhammer
05-10-2006, 05:22 PM
Yet another movie that I will go to the movies and see and probably enjoy it while the critics are bashing it.
Has Emmerich ever had a movie that wasn't panned by the critics?
Unleashed
05-10-2006, 05:30 PM
the Patriot
thealiasman2000
05-11-2006, 08:20 AM
Unleashed:
if you don't, in fact, speak caveman language, how the hell are you supposed to understand them when they talk if they don't speak English?
Cinemaman
05-11-2006, 08:51 AM
Have no interest about it.
Unleashed
05-11-2006, 03:55 PM
Unleashed:
if you don't, in fact, speak caveman language, how the hell are you supposed to understand them when they talk if they don't speak English?
They shouldn't at all
thealiasman2000
05-12-2006, 08:01 AM
I'm pretty sure the more evolved cavemen developed some sort of speech.
primemover
05-12-2006, 09:01 PM
Human beings had language long before 10,000 BC.
Though it would seem weird for them to be speaking English, it would be like any movie spoken in English that was set in some other country(or even time), ie Red October. If it's a movie made for an American audience, it makes sense to have it played in the language American's understand.
The hard part here is convincing people that is what people 12,000 years ago said to eachother, because even though word to word translating is easy, context is not. Most people probably think people back then didn't even speak, and if they did it was nothing more than grunts relating to food and sex, and would probably never accept anything more.
Hunter Rider
07-10-2007, 06:24 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=21843
Ready to Go Back to 10,000 B.C.?
Source: Warner Bros. Pictures
July 10, 2007
Warner Bros. Pictures has provided ComingSoon.net with the first 30 seconds from the first trailer for Roland Emmerich's new epic adventure 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260), opening in theaters (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=21843#) on March 7, 2008. The anticipated film, written by Roland Emmerich and Harald Kloser, stars Steven Strait and Camilla Belle.
Click here (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260) to watch the clip and stay tuned tomorrow for the full version!
Cyrusbales
07-10-2007, 06:26 PM
Jesus, Day after tomorrow was horrifically bad, and now he's being allowed to work again??? :(
scifiwolf
07-10-2007, 06:29 PM
I can't believe we've gone from trailers, to teasers, to announcements, to teaser for the goddamn announcements.
cryptic name
07-10-2007, 06:32 PM
Thats right. In ID4 everyone else in the world sat on their butts and waited for the US to come up with a plan. cos thats all we do. we wait and hide under our beds until the mighty US of A comes up with idea to save our lousy skins.
and then, they generously let everyone help them when their own land is a frozen wasteland.
I thought both movies were actualyy documentaries, they were so true to life.
at least you admit it :oldrazz:
Catman
07-10-2007, 06:45 PM
http://www.pureimagination.co.uk/captaincaveman/images/caveyshouttmb.jpg
Now THAT would have kicked ass! :yay:
Darkly Dexter
07-10-2007, 06:54 PM
Jesus, Day after tomorrow was horrifically bad, and now he's being allowed to work again??? :(
LOL so true
Hunter Rider
07-10-2007, 07:07 PM
I liked the way it was building before the cut it off
Wolfwood
07-10-2007, 07:13 PM
I can't believe we've gone from trailers, to teasers, to announcements, to teaser for the goddamn announcements.
Seriously, what's the point of that if the full thing is being put out tomorrow?
Mr. Credible
07-10-2007, 07:15 PM
how was the day after tomorrow "horrifically bad"?
maybe it wasn't your cup of tea, but it was hardly a bad movie. it was watchable, at the least. people here need to learn the difference between horrible (uwe boll movies) bad (paul anderson movies) and decent, but not great (emmerich movies)
there's a fine line, but a line none the less.
scifiwolf
07-10-2007, 07:53 PM
The Patriot was a great movie, IMO.
Darth Elektra
07-10-2007, 11:38 PM
Dang, can't wait till tommorrow.
Wolfwood
07-10-2007, 11:44 PM
Watch the teaser!
http://raincloud.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/10000bc/teaser/teaser_500.mov
That's the same 30 second clip. :o
dark_b
07-11-2007, 04:21 AM
so i dont know the whole story but didnt it looked like hte lights from city were turning off?
Mr. Credible
07-11-2007, 06:19 AM
i think that was like, a metaphor, for going back to a time before electricity and stuff.
Cyrusbales
07-11-2007, 10:33 AM
how was the day after tomorrow "horrifically bad"?
maybe it wasn't your cup of tea, but it was hardly a bad movie. it was watchable, at the least. people here need to learn the difference between horrible (uwe boll movies) bad (paul anderson movies) and decent, but not great (emmerich movies)
there's a fine line, but a line none the less.
The writing in both narrative and dialogue was up there with Catwoman for lack of quality. Sure the effects were decent, but that was it. As for direction, what direction? It was completely uninspiring and pointless.
No emotion from actors, nothing, it was a cheesey and poorly constructed movie with virtually no remotely worthwhile qualities.
What the hell is the point in doing a movie like this if you aren't going to have dinosaurs in it? Seriously, ****.
terry78
07-11-2007, 11:35 AM
What the hell is the point in doing a movie like this if you aren't going to have dinosaurs in it? Seriously, ****.
It's like ice age type stuff...they're basing it more after the dino time.
I know, but really, does ANYONE care about that? The only reason people even think about cavemen is because they make tasty dinosaur food. And since we all know this will be full of impossible and epic action feats, it might as well be against dinosaurs instead of against cats. So lame.
jaguarr
07-11-2007, 12:06 PM
I don't know. Conceptually it could be very cool, with cavemen dealing with sabretooth tigers, woolly mammoths and the other creatures of that time. Since it's Emmerich, though, I'm pretty sure it will be big on visuals and short on script or plot.
jag
phoenixflight
07-11-2007, 12:52 PM
Here is the full length teaser trailer:
At yahoomovies.com
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809724938/video/3317950/
phoenixflight
07-11-2007, 12:56 PM
Directed By
Roland Emmerich (Stargate, Independence Day, Godzilla, Day After Tomorrow)
Starring:
Steven Strait, Camilla Belle, Cliff Curtis, Omar Sharif, Tim Barlow, Marco Khan, Reece Ritchie, Mo Zinal, Mona Hammond, Joel Virgel Vierset, Suri van Sornsen, Joel Fry, Nathanael Baring, Joe Vaz
Plot Summary:
It was a time when man and beast were untamed and the mighty mammoth roamed the earth. A time when ideas and beliefs were born that forever shaped mankind. 10,000 B.C. follows a young hunter (Steven Strait) on his quest to lead an army across a vast desert, battling saber tooth tigers and prehistoric predators as he unearths a lost civilization and attempts to rescue the woman he loves (Camilla Belle) from an evil warlord determined to possess her.
Movies205
07-11-2007, 12:57 PM
My opinion of Roland Emerich is that he's a relic from the 1990s and Day After Tommorrow painfully prove this, his films end up being all flash with some decent characterizations that never go anywhere. However with that said the trailer has me somewhat exicted for this film since it could be what Apocalypto could of been.
Hunter Rider
07-11-2007, 01:18 PM
I have to say i love the look of that trailer:hyper:
Electrix
07-11-2007, 01:18 PM
Looks cool :up:
liesse00
07-11-2007, 01:23 PM
I'm looking forward to this.
Darth Elektra
07-11-2007, 01:49 PM
Looks good. :up:
AhabTheArab
07-11-2007, 01:56 PM
What the hell is the point in doing a movie like this if you aren't going to have dinosaurs in it? Seriously, ****.
because people never saw dinosaurs back then. they died off before. teaser peaked my interest.
Cinemaman
07-11-2007, 02:03 PM
It's Emmerich, so I'm not going to even watch the teaser, because I know it will be waste of time for me (I've already given him a chance).
Movies205
07-11-2007, 02:05 PM
because people never saw dinosaurs back then. they died off before. teaser peaked my interest.
Dude it's ****in Emerich it's a little late in his career to start adhering to any type of logic
terry78
07-11-2007, 02:06 PM
Look, I want to see a caveman/cavewoman fight/outrun a sabretooth tiger dammit. And that's what I'm going to get.
Shifty
07-11-2007, 02:09 PM
I have to say i love the look of that trailer:hyper:
As do I.
Warner Bros. and Legendary Pictures have another "B.C." action/adventure March release, looks like it could do well like 300 did.
Mr. Socko
07-11-2007, 02:11 PM
I saw the trailer with Potter, and it looks pretty good. But will anyone speak in this movie?
dark_b
07-11-2007, 02:28 PM
a bomb
a bomb.
Abaddon
07-11-2007, 02:36 PM
Given that Day After was slightly better than Godzilla and ID4, which were complete f****** b*******, this might be, maybe, reasonably watchable, perhaps.
effects-wise maybe. :huh:
Mr. Credible
07-11-2007, 02:37 PM
It's Emmerich, so I'm not going to even watch the teaser, because I know it will be waste of time for me (I've already given him a chance).
it probably took you longer to come in here and post that than it would to watch the teaser.
if you don't care, don't post anything.
Mr. Credible
07-11-2007, 02:39 PM
and granted, we know next to nothing about the story... but did that teaser seem really, really off historically to anyone else?
i mean, temples? dinasaurs? (i swear i saw one or two)
oh well... it still looked cool. and that's about anyone should expect.
jaguarr
07-11-2007, 03:34 PM
Thanks, MM! :up:
jag
terry78
07-11-2007, 03:45 PM
I'll be honest...this is how you do a Tarzan flick...minus the rest of the characters.
dark_b
07-11-2007, 03:47 PM
this movie looks like poseidon.......it looks like it was made to bomb.
jaguarr
07-11-2007, 03:48 PM
I'll be honest...this is how you do a Tarzan flick...minus the rest of the characters.
Trailer looks great, actually. Most of Emmerich's trailers do, though. I'm curious to see how the story and plot have been developed and executed, though. That's usually where his films just fall to complete pieces.
As for Tarzan, nobody has yet been able to top the Greystoke film with Christopher Lambert. That film is just so well done, even if some of the monkey suits are a bit on the cheesy side. To me, that's really the gold standard of Tarzan films that sets the mark.
jag
Mr. Credible
07-11-2007, 04:36 PM
heh, i just realized after watching transformers again: 10,000 BC is when carbon dating told them the allspark landed on earth.
just a funny little coincidence.
liesse00
07-11-2007, 05:35 PM
this movie looks like poseidon.......it looks like it was made to bomb.
Yea, we know you told us
xwolverine2
07-11-2007, 05:41 PM
looks boring...
very boring....
zzzzZZZzz.....
nocomics
07-11-2007, 05:43 PM
Sounds like this is gonna be like apoctlypto(sp) type movie imo...
Tempest19
07-11-2007, 06:15 PM
One of the BEST teasers that I have ever saw... going to be more than an infinity times better than Apocolypto.
I love prehistoric creatures, so this movie- at least for me- is going to be kick ass.
Hell, I even had a fangasm while watching it!
Hunter Rider
07-11-2007, 07:03 PM
Trailer looks great, actually. Most of Emmerich's trailers do, though. I'm curious to see how the story and plot have been developed and executed, though. That's usually where his films just fall to complete pieces.
jag
I agree Jag but for me the scope and visual side alone is enough to scream to me "See it on the big screen"
Dark Donnie
07-11-2007, 07:43 PM
Loved the trailer....action packed. The effects look really well done as well. Some pretty badass animals in there mammoths, and a sabretooth, combine that with what looks like a battle or two between some pretty rough looking guys and I think it will be pretty good.
I think he makes good popcorn flicks which im sure this will be. I'll definately check it out in theaters!
aaron
07-11-2007, 07:51 PM
did i see dinosaurs in that trailer?
Mr. Socko
07-11-2007, 08:06 PM
Are they going to talk and speak english?
If it's going to be accurate then they won't, but then I wouldn't see it either if all they do is grunt lol
the a1ant
07-11-2007, 08:21 PM
The teaser trailer was awesome. This looks to be a fun film. Historically speaking, this looks off, but the visuals are great and I love his films for what they are. I think I saw dinosaurs in there :confused:
Teaser didn't look too bad. I quite enjoyed it. It also reminded me of Apocalypto, but the movie won't probably be as good as Apocalypto were.
I wonder if there will be any nods to the old Hammer prehistoric movies. :woot: Akita! Akita! Shanna! :woot:
green
07-11-2007, 09:51 PM
That looks 10,000 times better than I thought it would.:woot:
AhabTheArab
07-11-2007, 10:34 PM
the cgi looks like ass. but it looks like a lot of action.... bomb.
deathshead2
07-11-2007, 10:36 PM
Lets see I liked Stargate,ID,Godzilla, and DAT was at least fun to watch once, and I thought the patriot sucked. So this movie could go either way for me.
Cinemaman
07-12-2007, 02:40 PM
it probably took you longer to come in here and post that than it would to watch the teaser.
if you don't care, don't post anything.
It's forum. I can express my opinion even in the hread about the movie,w hich doens't look intersting to me.
turtlefocker
07-12-2007, 02:41 PM
Well thats just like your opinoun man... and mine to this film will suck
turtlefocker
07-12-2007, 02:44 PM
The only ONLY thing that could redeem this film is a young Rachel Welch in a sexy furry bikini.
Hunter Rider
07-12-2007, 02:46 PM
It's forum. I can express my opinion even in the hread about the movie,w hich doens't look intersting to me.
Still worth checking the trailer IMO Cine,i think it looks like a fun spectacle movie for the big screen
Cinemaman
07-12-2007, 03:10 PM
Still worth checking the trailer IMO Cine,i think it looks like a fun spectacle movie for the big screen
I'll think about it :woot:
Mogwai
07-12-2007, 06:56 PM
this looks amazing.
terry78
07-12-2007, 07:11 PM
CGI sabretooth tigers have come a long way since the CGI version of Baby Puss in the Flintstones movie.
Mogwai
07-12-2007, 07:41 PM
lol, that wasn't a puppet?
rdh007
07-12-2007, 07:44 PM
meh.
Red Mask
07-12-2007, 08:15 PM
So a 'prehistoric man' will face sabretooth tigers, mammoths, go all the way south to Mesopotamia and Africa, where the earliest pyramids and civilizations were formed, just so he can save his tribe thousands of miles back up north? O.K...
terry78
07-12-2007, 08:17 PM
So a 'prehistoric man' will face sabretooth tigers, mammoths, go all the way south to Mesopotamia and Africa, where the earliest pyramids and civilizations were formed, just so he can save his tribe thousands of miles back up north? O.K...
But it'll look good while he's doing it though. :o
turtlefocker
07-12-2007, 08:17 PM
So a 'prehistoric man' will face sabretooth tigers, mammoths, go all the way south to Mesopotamia and Africa, where the earliest pyramids and civilizations were formed, just so he can save his tribe thousands of miles back up north? O.K...
Is that seriously the plot
Yaaaay, I can't wait.
LOL at the "It's not accurate!!" people, come on, it's fantasy!
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/1859/rolleyesft8.jpg
terry78
07-12-2007, 08:29 PM
Yaaaay, I can't wait.
LOL at the "It's not accurate!!" people, come on, it's fantasy! :roll:
These are the same ones that would complain about The Flintstones had they been kids back in the 60's.
"Er, clearly that triceratops wasn't around until the mesozoic age ended, and he wouldn't have been green either."
These are the same ones that would complain about The Flintstones had they been kids back in the 60's.
"Er, clearly that triceratops wasn't around until the mesozoic age ended, and he wouldn't have been green either."
*brain cancer*
:( :down
Red Mask
07-12-2007, 08:35 PM
But it'll look good while he's doing it though. :o
Of course he will. He's the lead character.
Red Mask
07-12-2007, 08:37 PM
These are the same ones that would complain about The Flintstones had they been kids back in the 60's.
"Er, clearly that triceratops wasn't around until the mesozoic age ended, and he wouldn't have been green either."
But it will give those Biblical Creationists something to holler back at! :woot: I wonder if we'll be seeing any black ancient Egyptians too.
TNC9852002
07-12-2007, 10:41 PM
the cgi looks like ass.
Well, the movie doesn't come out for another 8 months...
-TNC
Mogwai
07-13-2007, 04:59 PM
will we see ppl being carried off by pterodactyls?
So a 'prehistoric man' will face sabretooth tigers, mammoths, go all the way south to Mesopotamia and Africa, where the earliest pyramids and civilizations were formed, just so he can save his tribe thousands of miles back up north? O.K...
Blah . . .
When you watch the trailer, you'll notice that they say "from the director of independence day & the day after tomorrow" there is no mention of Emmerich's biggest success, GODZILLA, LOL.
http://img.viacomlocalnetworks.com/images_sizedimage_340173136/xl
Warhammer
07-16-2007, 02:01 AM
Blah . . .
When you watch the trailer, you'll notice that they say "from the director of independence day & the day after tomorrow" there is no mention of Emmerich's biggest success, GODZILLA, LOL.
http://img.viacomlocalnetworks.com/images_sizedimage_340173136/xl
:wow:
That movie put anything directed by Spielberg to shame.
Mogwai
07-16-2007, 06:13 AM
^^no doubt.
Excel
07-16-2007, 09:07 AM
looks sweet! I love the title; it sounds so epic. picture some huge, james earl jones type voice proclaiming
ten THOUSEND BEE. SEE.
batman44
07-16-2007, 09:48 AM
But it will give those Biblical Creationists something to holler back at! :woot: I wonder if we'll be seeing any black ancient Egyptians too.
Nope, I see it as pure fantasy fun.
Director of Godzilla? :( :down
Poetic Chaos
07-19-2007, 06:59 PM
I'm a Camilla Bell fan so I'm interested.
xwolverine2
07-19-2007, 07:33 PM
Well, the movie doesn't come out for another 8 months...
-TNC
they will never improve it... ill bet money on it
Hunter Rider
10-03-2007, 02:58 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=37999
The New 10,000 B.C. Poster!
Source: Warner Bros. Pictures
October 3, 2007
Warner Bros. Pictures has provided ComingSoon.net with a first look at the new poster (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=37999#) for Roland Emmerich's 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260), hitting theaters (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=37999#) on March 7.
It was a time when man and beast were untamed and the mighty mammoth roamed the earth. A time when ideas and beliefs were born that forever shaped mankind. b>10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260) follows a young hunter (Steven Strait) on his quest to lead an army across a vast desert, battling saber tooth tigers and prehistoric predators as he unearths a lost civilization and attempts to rescue the woman he loves (Camilla Belle) from an evil warlord determined to possess her.
http://i21.tinypic.com/2uh02ub.jpg
terry78
10-03-2007, 03:01 PM
He looks like Snuffleupagus.
"Bird, he's gonna stick me with that spear...oh dear."
Darkly Dexter
10-03-2007, 05:06 PM
nice poster
Mr. Socko
10-03-2007, 10:05 PM
As I said before, this movie is doomed to fail.
Firstly, no one will see a film about Cavemen who grunt and no words are spoken throughout the entire movie.
Secondly, if they do speak english, no one in the world will take this seriously.
Asteroid-Man
10-03-2007, 10:23 PM
I am really interested in this movie! So there! :p
Ratcrawler
10-03-2007, 11:02 PM
Yeah, I wanna see it myself. I don't care if they sPeak as long as they don't use geico.com.
Hunter Rider
11-29-2007, 12:01 PM
http://i19.tinypic.com/8c32qlh.jpg
DorkyFresh
11-29-2007, 12:04 PM
even though Emmerich's movies aren't all that great, i still enjoy them. i was around 14 when Independence Day came out so i loved it along with Godzilla. Day After Tomorrow was a solid popcorn flick. i guess that's how i would describe Emmerich's movies.....solid popcorn flicks.
dark_b
11-29-2007, 12:17 PM
a hot chick 10,000 Bc :o
only in america
Philly Phanboy
11-29-2007, 01:23 PM
http://i19.tinypic.com/8c32qlh.jpg
So cavemen had dreadlocks...the Flintstones lied to me. :cmad: :cmad:
porchmonkey408
11-29-2007, 01:34 PM
What the Hell!?
patrickbateman
11-29-2007, 01:41 PM
WOW i wanna see ICE AGE 3
C.F. Kane
11-29-2007, 05:23 PM
http://i19.tinypic.com/8c32qlh.jpg
Wow. Female Australopitheci really knew how to apply foundation.
nocomics
11-29-2007, 06:20 PM
As I said before, this movie is doomed to fail.
Firstly, no one will see a film about Cavemen who grunt and no words are spoken throughout the entire movie.
Secondly, if they do speak english, no one in the world will take this seriously.
/shrug Quest for Fire anyone
I'm guessing there will be subtitles? At least I hope so, would hate to have all that CGI,and action be squashed cause of no dialect. I don't think todays audience could handle it that way...
gkokujin
11-29-2007, 06:24 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen,
i give you.... TUROK
SapphirePrima
11-29-2007, 06:30 PM
Is that Camilla Belle? And that guy is pretty cute. :o
terry78
11-29-2007, 07:54 PM
Their dreds are tighter than most black people's. :o
StrainedEyes
11-29-2007, 09:18 PM
I'm mad that decency was invented before 10,000 BC... Even back then guys still had to work to see the goods.
This movie looks stupid... What's up with the poster? Why did they randomly put this tiny guy in the corner? He's way to small to have any relation to the mammoth.
Cavemen should not have eye liner and neatly shaven goatees.
:dry: To this movie :dry: To the max.
chaseter
11-29-2007, 10:18 PM
Wow. Female Australopitheci really knew how to apply foundation.
And keep those pesky eye brows waxed:o
A Dark Knight
11-29-2007, 10:22 PM
Need to see a full trailer before I decide to go and see this or not, the teaser really didn't get me excited to see it at all.
A Dark Knight
11-29-2007, 10:24 PM
I was hoping for a 300 type film, I don't think I am going to get that.
A Dark Knight
11-29-2007, 10:25 PM
What really is the story of this film? I have no idea from the teaser.
Is this movie sub titled, or is there just not much language involved or what? Trailer was alright but I'm not really sure what to think of this.
Catman
12-08-2007, 11:51 PM
no one will see a film about Cavemen who grunt and no words are spoken throughout the entire movie.
um...
http://imdb.com/title/tt0082484/
Hunter Rider
12-12-2007, 09:37 PM
http://www.chud.com/index.php?type=news&id=12895
Full trailer.
Timstuff
12-12-2007, 10:24 PM
The trailer was surprisingly cool. I'll keep my eyes on this one, it could be a cool fantasy epic.
Taiwarriorz21
12-12-2007, 11:18 PM
dude i loved the trailer. only thing i dont like is the raptor was like a tall bird with a beak. Gosh Jurassic Park IV needs to hurry up and be made!!!!!!!!!! Come on Spielberg!!!!
Timstuff
12-12-2007, 11:53 PM
I'm pretty sure the "raptor" that you're referring to was a "tall bird." There weren't many dinos around in the ice age, to my knowledge.
Arc-Light
12-13-2007, 12:12 AM
dude i loved the trailer. only thing i dont like is the raptor was like a tall bird with a beak. Gosh Jurassic Park IV needs to hurry up and be made!!!!!!!!!! Come on Spielberg!!!!
Ahh you do know what raptor means right. There were large predators birds back in the day. No dino's but large birds. I am curious on how they deal with the 1st civilization thing, from the looks of the trailer it seems they are pushing it.
Tempest19
12-13-2007, 02:18 AM
Awesome. No subtitles. :)
dark_b
12-13-2007, 02:24 AM
Ahh you do know what raptor means right. There were large predators birds back in the day. No dino's but large birds. I am curious on how they deal with the 1st civilization thing, from the looks of the trailer it seems they are pushing it.they are pushing it to the extreme. :o
french joker
12-13-2007, 07:43 AM
Awesome. No subtitles. :)
they speak english:whatever:
um...
http://imdb.com/title/tt0082484/
Was that a blockbuster with a huge budget?
If so, I'd be most certain it bombed.
Timstuff
12-13-2007, 08:48 AM
Was that a blockbuster with a huge budget?
If so, I'd be most certain it bombed.
Well what do you expect? It was a movie about freaking ape men. Think Planet of the Apes without sci-fi. Or Charlton Heston, for that matter.
terry78
12-13-2007, 08:49 AM
I do like that they got the mammoths and sabretooth cats pretty decent looking. They're CG, but it's decent CG. Bring on Flintstones 3. :o
A Dark Knight
12-13-2007, 09:23 AM
I have to admit the trailer is actually pretty good, I will check this out.
Ratcrawler
12-13-2007, 10:02 AM
Is it on youtube?
I do like that they got the mammoths and sabretooth cats pretty decent looking. They're CG, but it's decent CG. Bring on Flintstones 3. :o
So long as it ignore's the prequel entirely and doesn't recast Rosie O'Donnell as Betty Rubble.
I SEE SPIDEY
12-13-2007, 01:28 PM
The director is crap, so the movie has a 90% chance of sucking. I'll torture myself on DVD.
Ratcrawler
12-13-2007, 01:33 PM
http://i19.tinypic.com/8c32qlh.jpg
Camilla Belle is hot as hell but in my eyes she's no Raquel...
http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f309/giantessrule/Posters/001b.jpg
And that dude looks an awful lot like...well, me.
http://pix.hotornot.com/pics/H8/KY/N8/HE/RSARSRHXSVNP.bmp
nocomics
12-13-2007, 03:15 PM
Seen the trailer,it don't look to bad. I think the title of the movie led ppl astray or something,lot of ppl think its like a Quest for Fire type movie. Its definately not,more like a braveheart/Apolypto type movie rolled in one.
I'll check it out for sure looks like an entertaining movie for sure...
Tempest19
12-13-2007, 03:23 PM
they speak english:whatever:
Um- obviously... :o Thought that was obvious, lmaol. :woot::oldrazz:
Hunter Rider
12-14-2007, 11:45 AM
http://i10.tinypic.com/735cocn.jpg
Hunter Rider
12-15-2007, 10:16 PM
http://i3.tinypic.com/8az3qf7.jpg
Ratcrawler
12-15-2007, 10:22 PM
LOL, Take THAT, Beowulf & Gilgamesh!
What was funny about the trailer is that they say something like "It's the greatest legend never told" or something. Then how is it a legend? O_o??
Drizzle
12-15-2007, 10:23 PM
http://i3.tinypic.com/8az3qf7.jpg
This looks strangely familiar...
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/PYR/NECA0012~300-Posters.jpg
liesse00
12-15-2007, 10:38 PM
http://www.10000bcmovie.com/moreoptions.html trailer in quicktime and wmp hd
bell110
12-18-2007, 05:08 PM
Anyone else get the feeling like there might be some sort of twist dealing with extraterresterials? I need to watch the trailer again.
DOG LIPS
12-31-2007, 09:41 PM
Mmmmm... Camilla Belle. :heart:
I'd never even heard of this until I saw the movie poster in the theater, then looked online for the trailer. Looks tasty.
Lord Blackbolt
12-31-2007, 11:33 PM
It would be cool if this was a prequel to Stargate...I mean these guys did direct that movie. What if the Pyramid flies off at the end of the movie. Now I'd love that.
SapphirePrima
12-31-2007, 11:35 PM
Anyone have a sypnosis for this movie? It looks interesting then really unbelievable.
liesse00
01-01-2008, 11:45 AM
In a remote mountain tribe, the young hunter, D'Leh (Steven Strait), has found his heart's passion - the beautiful Evolet (Camilla Belle). When a band of mysterious warlords raid his village and kidnap Evolet, D'Leh is forced to lead a small group of hunters to pursue the warlords to the end of the world to save her. Driven by destiny, the unlikely band of warriors must battle saber-tooth tigers and prehistoric predators and, at their heroic journey's end, they uncover a Lost Civilization. Their ultimate fate lies in an empire beyond imagination, where great pyramids reach into the skies. Here they will take their stand against a powerful god who has brutally enslaved their people.
Electrix
01-15-2008, 12:43 PM
4 New Posters!
http://filmonic.com/10-000-bc-get-4-new-posters/
dpm07
01-15-2008, 01:12 PM
This movie is going to be awesome on Blu-Ray!
One of the things that is interesting is the pyramids, and the people who definitely look like they belong to an antedeluvian civilization. Perhaps Atlantis or Lemuria.
I do like that the film presents things as they probably occurred and not as the dogmatic conservative historians or archaeologists would have us believe they occurred.
Hunter Rider
01-21-2008, 05:28 AM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=41110
10,000 B.C. Site Launched with New Extended Clip
Source: Mike Markus
January 21, 2008
Warner Bros. Pictures has brought online the full official website (http://www.10000bcmovie.com/) for directorhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/1.gif (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=41110#) Roland Emmerich's epic, 10,000 B.C. (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=13260), opening in theaters on March 7. The new site includes an extended clip that takes place in D'Leh's (Steven Strait) village, along with downloads, photos and more.
Click here (http://www.10000bcmovie.com/) here to check it out!
liesse00
01-21-2008, 11:39 AM
there's a couple new clips if you navigate through the website
Golgo-13
01-21-2008, 01:04 PM
I'm really looking forward to this one. :up:
Asteroid-Man
01-21-2008, 08:07 PM
This movie looks great but I have two cents to add in:
1. The CGI on the Sabretooth Tiger's face is terrible
2. If the characters didn't talk and just sort of grunted and stuff with subtitles, that would've been better then them all speaking English!
Other then that, this movie looks AWESOME!
EDIT:
Giant Eagles!? WTF!? :huh:
SapphirePrima
01-21-2008, 08:36 PM
In a remote mountain tribe, the young hunter, D'Leh (Steven Strait), has found his heart's passion - the beautiful Evolet (Camilla Belle). When a band of mysterious warlords raid his village and kidnap Evolet, D'Leh is forced to lead a small group of hunters to pursue the warlords to the end of the world to save her. Driven by destiny, the unlikely band of warriors must battle saber-tooth tigers and prehistoric predators and, at their heroic journey's end, they uncover a Lost Civilization. Their ultimate fate lies in an empire beyond imagination, where great pyramids reach into the skies. Here they will take their stand against a powerful god who has brutally enslaved their people.
wow he beefed up :eek: :O
terry78
01-21-2008, 08:43 PM
This movie looks great but I have two cents to add in:
1. The CGI on the Sabretooth Tiger's face is terrible
2. If the characters didn't talk and just sort of grunted and stuff with subtitles, that would've been better then them all speaking English!
Other then that, this movie looks AWESOME!
EDIT:
Giant Eagles!? WTF!? :huh:
You're crazy, boy. That sabretooth was decent. Now if it was talking a la Aslan, then yeah.
cookiva
01-21-2008, 08:51 PM
I dunno. That sabretooth was pretty bad...
terry78
01-21-2008, 08:54 PM
I said before that's what The Flintstones pet cat would look like if he just got pissed one day.
The Geek Vault
01-21-2008, 08:59 PM
at first I thought this movie looked like Apocolypto and looked horrible but I'm kinda pumped for it though now.
TNC9852002
01-21-2008, 09:03 PM
Unfinished CGI is never even a possibility anymore? :rolleyes:
-TNC
Asteroid-Man
01-21-2008, 09:19 PM
You're crazy, boy. That sabretooth was decent. Now if it was talking a la Aslan, then yeah.
Man, it looked fake. For today's standards I give it :down
I dunno. That sabretooth was pretty bad...
:up:
I said before that's what The Flintstones pet cat would look like if he just got pissed one day.
yeah but this is supposed to look real :oldrazz:
at first I thought this movie looked like Apocolypto and looked horrible but I'm kinda pumped for it though now.
Man, Apocalypto was great and this is just gonna be better!
Unfinished CGI is never even a possibility anymore? :rolleyes:
-TNC
Nope. And It's probably not unfinished. At least not in trailer 2 and in the poster. The movie's done and the tiger still looks bad. Either way, the rest looks amazing!
turtlefocker
02-05-2008, 10:06 PM
If the characters didn't talk and just sort of grunted and stuff with subtitles, that would've been better then them all speaking English!
I agree. Should have went in a similar direction as apocalypto,. I hope there is very little dialog.
I think it would have been best with none. just grunts. no subtitles. But the general audience would not have enjoyed that.
The superbowl spot was a waste of money.
Asteroid-Man
02-11-2008, 08:18 PM
*high-fives turtlefocker*
wait, there was a superbowl spot!?
Bubonic
02-18-2008, 02:20 AM
Hopefully the Hulk trailer will be attached to this.
Oh, and do they have humans coexisting with Dinosaurs in this?
Krozee
02-18-2008, 03:25 AM
Hopefully the Hulk trailer will be attached to this.
Oh, and do they have humans coexisting with Dinosaurs in this?
I'm pretty sure dinosaurs existed 65 million years ago. So my guess is no. :oldrazz:
Bubonic
02-18-2008, 03:47 AM
I'm pretty sure dinosaurs existed 65 million years ago. So my guess is no. :oldrazz:
Oh I'm not talking about facts, I'm just wondering if the movie disregarded some... In the trailer I could of sworn I saw something scaly running around.
That would be retarded.
liesse00
02-18-2008, 08:54 AM
There are no dinasaurs in this
Krozee
02-18-2008, 05:20 PM
Oh I'm not talking about facts, I'm just wondering if the movie disregarded some... In the trailer I could of sworn I saw something scaly running around.
That would be retarded.
Oh ok. Haha you had me worried there for a moment. I think that was a big bird-like thing.
terry78
02-18-2008, 05:22 PM
http://epguides.com/ExtremeDinosaurs/logo.jpg
Actually, Emmerich was trying to keep it under wraps, but the above do appear at some point in the film.
DBZ2cool
02-18-2008, 05:30 PM
^ funny
Harry Goblin
02-18-2008, 06:04 PM
I just cant get myself hyped to see this. Ill see it tho, but like someone said above, grunts and no subtitles would be great but im sure people would complain about that.
I actually think the tiger looks fine, great actually
DBZ2cool
02-18-2008, 06:15 PM
This looks less appealing to me than spiderwick chronicles and that does not bode well for its boxoffice prospects.
Mogwai
02-18-2008, 08:18 PM
i'm interested in seeing it. mostly for the main character, caveman guy.
Sebastos
02-18-2008, 08:43 PM
This looks really good.
JohnRico
02-18-2008, 08:56 PM
The main character in this movie reminds me of Ronon from Stargate Atlantis
Sebastos
02-18-2008, 09:02 PM
He does look a bit like him...
Krozee
02-18-2008, 09:29 PM
This looks less appealing to me than spiderwick chronicles and that does not bode well for its boxoffice prospects.
Spiderwick was actually really good. Not as good as Narnia, but at least the marketing was accurate, unlike Terabithia. :cmad:
Dangerous
02-19-2008, 08:48 AM
Hm, still need to get this film.
I think the pay day will be the right time.
X-Maniac
02-19-2008, 11:42 AM
Hm, still need to get this film.
I think the pay day will be the right time.
What the hell are you on about? 10,000BC hasn't been released yet so you can't get it on pay day!
terry78
02-19-2008, 02:23 PM
I'm shocked there is no video game tie-in with this. It just screams hack and slash.
Dangerous
02-19-2008, 04:28 PM
What the hell are you on about? 10,000BC hasn't been released yet so you can't get it on pay day!
Miss read the thread title, thought it was One Million years BC, not ten k.
FaT_tONle
02-19-2008, 04:47 PM
English speaking cavemen.... wooot... can't wait....
Prison Mike
02-19-2008, 05:19 PM
this is the second time a movie about the past is coming out around this time. Last year was 300 and now 10,000 B.C. I guess Spring break time is as good as any for a history lesson. lol
dolfan55aj
02-19-2008, 06:05 PM
I'll probably see it, looks decent. I'm glad they're speaking english too, simplifies things. Looks like it's got action, and it looks pretty epic in terms of fx and cgi, the civilizations look pretty cool overall. Not saying I'll see it the day it's out, but eventually for sure.
Golgo-13
02-19-2008, 06:12 PM
Yeah, it looks pretty epic. I just hope it isn't overly Hollywood like 'TROY' was.
If this is a success, i can't wait to see what they do with the 'Clash of the Titans' remake. :up:
FaT_tONle
02-19-2008, 06:17 PM
I'll probably see it, looks decent. I'm glad they're speaking english too, simplifies things. Looks like it's got action, and it looks pretty epic in terms of fx and cgi, the civilizations look pretty cool overall. Not saying I'll see it the day it's out, but eventually for sure.
THey should have went Apocalypto and gave us something audiences never have seen before... cavemen speaking english is a joke... no creativity whatsoever...
Golgo-13
02-19-2008, 06:30 PM
Subtitles can be a headache sometimes.
X-Maniac
02-19-2008, 06:50 PM
THey should have went Apocalypto and gave us something audiences never have seen before... cavemen speaking english is a joke... no creativity whatsoever...
Let's face it, the dumb American public isn't ready for anything but the recognisable twang of a US accent.
Even British movies have to have subtitles when released in the US. Such as The Full Monty, for instance.
This is, I assume, why in space series such as Star Trek, all the aliens speak in American English complete with accents.
I think you were expecting a bit much for dumb America to cope with a made-up prehistoric language if they can't even cope with British English.
Mr. Socko
02-19-2008, 06:59 PM
Emmerich hasn't made a good movie since ID4 and The Patriot which was 8 years ago. Outside of that, he rather sucks.
FaT_tONle
02-19-2008, 09:49 PM
Let's face it, the dumb American public isn't ready for anything but the recognisable twang of a US accent.
Even British movies have to have subtitles when released in the US. Such as The Full Monty, for instance.
This is, I assume, why in space series such as Star Trek, all the aliens speak in American English complete with accents.
I think you were expecting a bit much for dumb America to cope with a made-up prehistoric language if they can't even cope with British English.
Yeah I agree... but seriously... from the trailers it looked like that civilization was more advance than the Egyptians.... that structure rivaled ancient middle eastern and new world civs... so at the very least... get the damn date right... but with this average director what can you expect? Didn't even bother watching Day After Tomorrow... The Patriot was weak as hell... and Ind. Day was fifty years ago it seems.
Movies205
02-19-2008, 10:10 PM
Let's face it, the dumb American public isn't ready for anything but the recognisable twang of a US accent.
Even British movies have to have subtitles when released in the US. Such as The Full Monty, for instance.
This is, I assume, why in space series such as Star Trek, all the aliens speak in American English complete with accents.
I think you were expecting a bit much for dumb America to cope with a made-up prehistoric language if they can't even cope with British English.
Piss off, you bloody knobhead. I've been to England and I've been to Italy, you know what I learn that both cultures don't bother with movies outside of there own frickin film industries and US films. Christ don't get all ****in high and mighty because US audiences going to a cheesy popcorn film don't want bother reading subtitles. Don't call my country dumb when English TV is littered with programs 10X more retarded than anything American TV has put out.
P.S. If your from America then trying traveling outside it since you have a fabricated reality of what its really like out there.
FaT_tONle
02-19-2008, 10:14 PM
Piss off, you bloody knobhead. I've been to England and I've been to Italy, you know what I learn that both cultures don't bother with movies outside of there own frickin film industries and US films. Christ don't get all ****in high and mighty because US audiences going to a cheesy popcorn film don't want bother reading subtitles. Don't call my country dumb when English TV is littered with programs 10X more retarded than anything American TV has put out.
P.S. If your from America then trying traveling outside it since you have a fabricated reality of what its really like out there.
And you realize this is the country that made Meet the Spartans nuber 1 at the box office that weekend right? Sorry but the loud mouth isn't helping your case... the numbers speak for themselves... the kids these days are dumbasses in America... we simply go see the movies give us the d*** raising experiences... and I probably happen to be one of them.:csad: ... although I don't see crap films in cinemaplexes anymore with the internet and all...
Movies205
02-19-2008, 10:21 PM
And you realize this is the country that made Meet the Spartans nuber 1 at the box office that weekend right? Sorry but the loud mouth isn't helping your case... the numbers speak for themselves... the kids these days are dumbasses in America... and I happen to be one of them.:csad: ...
There's nothing worst than elitists who don't really place things in context at all. First off let's review the weekend that Meet the Spartans came out and how many theaters it was released in. It was released to a HIGH SATURATION theater count of 2,600 theaters. Its two other competitor that weekend was Rambo and Untraceable. Rambo appeals to a very distinct demographic of males and older gentleman so right off the bat the demographics are quite different. Untraceable had a rather scant marketing campaign and again wasn't really that appealing to the general demographic that goes the movies on the weekends which are teenagers. Its only real competition from the previous week was 27 Dresses and Cloverfield. Cloverfield weak WOM hurt that as well as the fact that 27 Dresses is such an obvious generic chick flick. So surveying the field the only new straight comedy in weeks comes out with a HUGE marketing campaign that appeals to Teenager is number 1, BIG SURPRISE.
What people also fail to realize is that weekend was down 11% the previous weekend had made 40-50 MIL MORE meaning theater attendance was down. Then if you follow the next weekend Meet the Spartans dropped 60%, BIG SURPRISE. So your argument had you placed in in perspective means really nothing and is no where near a strong incitement on the American people's intelligence.
X-Maniac
02-19-2008, 10:23 PM
Yeah I agree... but seriously... from the trailers it looked like that civilization was more advance than the Egyptians.... that structure rivaled ancient middle eastern and new world civs... so at the very least... get the damn date right... but with this average director what can you expect? Didn't even bother watching Day After Tomorrow... The Patriot was weak as hell... and Ind. Day was fifty years ago it seems.
Well, stylised reworkings of historical periods and events with huge inaccuracies have been happening for ever. Most recently in '300' and Beowulf. And of course One Million Years BC, which sounds almost like the inspiration for this movie, was completely inaccurate. Didn't stop it being a Harryhausen classic of its time though and still great to watch!
I want to see this movie for sure, but it's mainly for the creatures, visuals, and effects rather than for prehistoric character drama. Yes, i know that's shallow and I should go away and whip myself, but as long as the story isn't ridiculous, I'm happy to accept the fantasy/inaccuracy element.
But not in all instances. I felt Beowulf suffered from being an over-stylised fantasy retelling; an attempt to cash in on 300 that failed, largely because Neil Gaiman can't write likable characters.
War Party
02-19-2008, 10:27 PM
I was interested in this initially, but then I found out who the director was.
Movies205
02-19-2008, 10:30 PM
I want to see this movie for sure, but it's mainly for the creatures, visuals, and effects rather than for prehistoric character drama. Yes, i know that's shallow and I should go away and whip myself, but as long as the story isn't ridiculous, I'm happy to accept the fantasy/inaccuracy element.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with enjoying something that suppose to be entertaining.
X-Maniac
02-19-2008, 10:40 PM
Piss off, you bloody knobhead. I've been to England and I've been to Italy, you know what I learn that both cultures don't bother with movies outside of there own frickin film industries and US films. Christ don't get all ****in high and mighty because US audiences going to a cheesy popcorn film don't want bother reading subtitles. Don't call my country dumb when English TV is littered with programs 10X more retarded than anything American TV has put out.
P.S. If your from America then trying traveling outside it since you have a fabricated reality of what its really like out there.
Dear me, someone does get easily riled.
America does come across as pretty dumb at times. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone had to be retitled 'Sorcerer's Stone' because Americans kept wanting to know who the philosopher was. :hehe:
For the record, I'm English and have often been to the US and have many friends there.
The fact remains that subtitled movies put people off, unfortunately; and that the American public seems unable to cope with anything but American English with accents. Some alien races with alien languages would be excellent in Star Trek but 50 years on, I'm still waiting. American movies do quite well beyond the States, even though Hollywood's film output is less than a single per cent of the world's films. But films from other countries don't do well in America and films not set in a major American city (Stardust, Golden Compass, V for Vendetta) don't tend to do well in the US either. The Cloverfield creature just happened to attack NY and bite the head off Ms Liberty, the last man on earth happened to be in New York too (unlikely though that scenario is) in I Am Legend. At least the Fantastic Four ended up in London, and Jumper's teleportations did cover more of the world than is usual in these movies! :woot:
FaT_tONle
02-19-2008, 10:41 PM
There's nothing worst than elitists who don't really place things in context at all. First off let's review the weekend that Meet the Spartans came out and how many theaters it was released in. It was released to a HIGH SATURATION theater count of 2,600 theaters. Its two other competitor that weekend was Rambo and Untraceable. Rambo appeals to a very distinct demographic of males and older gentleman so right off the bat the demographics are quite different. Untraceable had a rather scant marketing campaign and again wasn't really that appealing to the general demographic that goes the movies on the weekends which are teenagers. Its only real competition from the previous week was 27 Dresses and Cloverfield. Cloverfield weak WOM hurt that as well as the fact that 27 Dresses is such an obvious generic chick flick. So surveying the field the only new straight comedy in weeks comes out with a HUGE marketing campaign that appeals to Teenager is number 1, BIG SURPRISE.
What people also fail to realize is that weekend was down 11% the previous weekend had made 40-50 MIL MORE meaning theater attendance was down. Then if you follow the next weekend Meet the Spartans dropped 60%, BIG SURPRISE. So your argument had you placed in in perspective means really nothing and is no where near a strong incitement on the American people's intelligence.
We can go through examples and the corresponding numbers, statistics, dempgraphics, competition, etc all day... the list never ends... but that's not the issue here... we also shouldn't be discussing American intelligence based on their tastes in films... but I only brought that up because I think there is something telling about that when you look at the films these days... the point I was making in the first place... its why can't films go back to the seriousness and the sincerity that historical set pieces once were... instead we get completely historically inaccurate films like 300 (although that was Miller's book so I give it a pass), a plethera of cheap horrors... ridiculous spoof films... when is enough enough? Yet people continue to go... when are we going to raise our standards? So speaking for me personally... I am not going to lower my standards to what I assume is an orignal screenplay with a suspect director as of late on what is a completely inaccurate portrayal of the time back then... people might want to dish out the eight bucks for the mamouths and sabertooths... but the CGI is not much better than what you see on Discovery if you ask me... I thought Mel gave us something unique with Apocalypto... it just wasn't executed right... but studios know anyway that films like that won't make jack ***** at the box office... but frankly... I personally am tired of the CGI fests and the animals alone won't dupe me into buying a ticket for 10,000 BC.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.