PDA

View Full Version : Neil Gaiman talks The Eternals


euroq
10-11-2005, 03:30 AM
http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/rage/index1.htm



Eternal Dreaming



By Blair Marnell (blairm@silverbulletcomicbooks.com)

Neil Gaiman has been writing professionally for over twenty years, with a laundry list of hit novels and comics including, Sandman, Death: The High Cost of Living, The Books of Magic, Good Omens, and American Gods. His latest novel, Anansi Boys has recently been released to great fanfare, while his latest film, MirrorMask is currently in limited release. Additionally, his next film, Beowulf just began principle photography. Recently, Gaiman took the time to answer some questions about The Eternals, his newly announced miniseries for Marvel, along with what his future comic plans may be…

Blair Marnell: First off, congratulations for Anansi Boys landing on top of the New York Times Best Sellers List.

Neil Gaiman: Thank you. It’s a bit of a dazing sort of experience. Like being hit by a very wonderful car.

BM: The word is out that you’re doing The Eternals for Marvel. Can you tell us how that came about?

NG: 1602 was always the first half of a two project thing. I didn’t know what project number two was going to be. Various things over the last couple of years have been suggested, we’ve gone backwards and forwards on it. I kept being amused, because I kept reading on a number of websites, I think including yours, what my next project was definitely going to be. And people would write to me and say, “Well, the secret is out. You’re definitely writing the X-Men. Why don’t you come clean about it?” And I’d say, “Cause I’m not. This is the first I’ve heard of it.” [laughs]

I think Rich Johnston managed at least two, perhaps three exposés of what project number two was going to be. In each case, I’d have to write and say “That’s not actually true.” The nearest one to being true, was at one point, Craig Russell and I were talking about taking over Thor, to get Thor working again. Craig and I talked about it, but really just couldn’t make it work in schedules. Then they wanted to get on with Thor so that kind of carried on without us. Or didn’t…

Then I was in New York in June, and Joe Quesada said “Look, what about The Eternals? Do you remember The Eternals?” I said “Oh my God, yes!” I read them as they came out back in the seventies. And even at the time, you sort of went, “Okay, there is something going on here. This is so Kirby.” But you also felt that it was late stage Kirby. It was Jack creating something with bits of things that went back to New Gods and bits of his 2001 comic and also bits of things like his designs for the Lord of Light theme park, that he did (it was designed but never made). All of that was the kind of stuff going in there. It was also a comic book that never seemed to know if it was in the Marvel universe or not. I remember noticing that when I was fifteen or sixteen when I was reading it. “Is this Marvel or isn’t it? Here you have some S.H.I.E.LD. agents and in the next issue it seems to be explicit that Marvel characters only exist in comics.” Then it never really finished, it just sort of died out and half-heartedly incorporated into the Marvel universe but never really seemed to jell. Bits of it did, bits of it didn’t. I thought that it would be a really fun project, so I said “Sure, I think I’ll do that.”

BM: What is that makes the Eternals special in a world that already has mutants, superheroes and supervillains?

NG: I think what makes them special is that they are neither mutants nor superheroes or supervillains. What I think is so interesting is that they are people. They have superpowers and some of them even have costumes, but fundamentally they’ve been undercover a very long time. And they are people who have cool God-like magical powers but they’re still “us,” only they are “us” without assured death in the same way. That’s one of the things I want to address and play around with. Plus, you know it’s got the Deviant characters, which again, is one of those weird wonderful Kirby concepts of “There is always a darkness to the light.” I look at it and go “I’m not sure it’s that simple.” And I’m not sure that’s necessarily how I’m going to play it.

BM: Funny thing is, I think the Deviants have appeared more often in the Marvel Universe than the Eternals have.

NG: Well, yes. And you can sort of see why… I would love to have lived in the universe in which Jack got to do the Eternals comic book that he had in his head with no editorial interference and nobody second guessing him and not having any restraints to keep him from finishing the story he started. To have the done The Eternals on the scale of what he did with the Fourth World stuff. I think that would be a wonderful universe to live in.

I am not Jack Kirby. And I am not even going to try and attempt that. What I’m going to try to do is essentially take the universe he created, the characters he created, the ideas that he created and strip them down and put them back together again. As far as I’m concerned, one of the great things about comics is that you’re always allowed to dump the bits you don’t like. Then the deal that comes with that is that the people who come in next are allowed to dump the bits that you did that they don’t like. So I get to try to retrofit the Eternals and see what’s interesting about them from my perspective and to try to create characters that add value to the Marvel Universe… Like going into the playground and leaving some good toys behind. I like the idea that other people can then come along and play with those toys. Frankly, if what I do doesn’t work, or if what I do only works if I’m doing it (which is also a possibility) it’s perfectly possible that people will go “You know, those toys that Neil left are crap. Let’s go back trying to play with other people’s versions of the Kirby toys and see if we can do something else.” And I wouldn’t mind that at all. That’s part of the joy and tragedy of comics.

Originally, I thought it was only the tragedy of comics, but doing Sandman I discovered it was also the joy. You could take these things and mostly treat them with respect but sometimes treat them with respect from the point of view that “This is true, but you didn’t know about it.” With The Eternals, I feel like I’ve been given a weird permission to do more than I would normally do. In taking over existing comic characters, I would normally be incredibly respectful, but very specifically with The Eternals, I look at what Jack did and I went “This is not part of the Marvel Universe… Except maybe it sort of is.” Since then, people other than Jack have tried to fold it into the Marvel Universe, with various degrees of success. Or lack of success. “Well… this character was actually an Eternal, or a son of an Eternal.” And then it gets to the point when you’ve got Zuras meeting Zeus and you go, “How did you get to there? You’ve got Gods in the Marvel Universe and you’ve got characters who inspired the Gods in the Marvel Universe that both somehow exist side by side. But that doesn’t work…” There have been various attempts to reconcile that but most of that stuff I’m not even going to try and reconcile. What I’m going to do is pick the bits that I like and start something new.

BM: Tell us about some of your plans for The Eternals. How are you going to integrate them into the Marvel Universe. And are there any characters in particular that you’ll be using?

NG: No.

BM: No?

NG: No!

BM: Okay…

NG: Good try, but I mean no. When I’ve got it all figured out, maybe I’ll talk about it. Or maybe I’ll make people wait until it happens. I don’t know. A lot of this has to do with the fact that I don’t like the way so much information is around on the web so long before things come out. Because people like to discuss them, long before they come out… long before they’re even thought about and decide what they think about them long before the first word has actually been written. However, it’s so much more fun (that’s the whole point of monthly comics, as far as I’m concerned) to keep as much secret as possible before you go public so that people can actually have many cool surprises when they go down to the comic store. And I hate the idea of talking about a comic that won’t come out I think, for a year. The first issue will probably be on sale in eleven months time. We want to do the same thing we did with 1602, which is have most of it done, or in my case, have most or all of it written before it starts coming out. I hate this thing in monthly comics where issues one and two come out on time, issue three comes out a bit late, issue four comes out very late, issue five comes out shortly after the deadline for it to be returnable and then people laugh at you when you come in and ask where issue six is. We almost made it with 1602, issue eight was late because it was an extra length issue and there were a few problems so we wound up skipping.

BM: Well, maybe you can answer this. What is it about The Eternals that appeals to you?

NG: Oddly enough, people keep going “Oh! It’s the God thing, isn’t it? You must love people who are mistaken for Gods.” No, it’s not, because I feel that I’ve done that in lots of different ways. What I love is doing stories about people… what attracts me to it is the idea of people with incredibly long life spans and doing these comics about people who are functionally immortal. People for whom time moves very differently and how things have changed over the years. I want to start creating the idea of the Eternals as a group and watch things change over time. Somebody who might have been your best friend two thousand years ago is your bitterest enemy a thousand years on from that. Or the way that a romance that happened ten thousand years ago can affect things happening fifty years ago. The idea of a hidden hand in human history, hidden agendas across human history. I really like the idea of playing with that. I think there are going to be some mysteries in it. I have some ideas for things that are going to happen that I hope you are not going to be able to figure out why they’ve happened or what was actually going on until the last issue. By that point, they won’t mean the things they did at the beginning, I suppose an example of the kind of thing I mean that somebody else once did, was when Alan (Moore) killed the Comedian. By the time we figured out who killed the Comedian…

BM: It wasn’t important anymore.

NG: Right, it’s not that important anymore, because “Oh my God, this is what’s actually happening…” The thing is what takes you into it. And the things that happen to Ikaris at the beginning of issue one are going to propel you through the rest of the series, I hope.

BM: Any plans for the Celestials to show up in the series?

NG: I’m trying to figure out what I’m doing with the Celestials. Again, the Celestials are one of those things where you look at something and you go “Okay, it wasn’t built to be part of the Marvel Universe. It was built to be part of a Kirbyverse that was going on at the time.” Because, apart from anything else, there’s no way that a thousand foot high alien can come stand on the Earth and say “I’m going to be here for fifty years deciding whether I should blow it up or end the experiment” and the heroes wouldn’t come out in force. None of them did because they weren’t in that universe. But then the Celestials have been folded into the Marvel Universe now, so what am I going to do with them? But what’s nice is that I get to do a story that’s going to take place over a very long time and there will be, you know, Hot Celestial Action in it.

BM: Do you have any idea how long the miniseries will be?

NG: I’m planning for six issues, probably with longer than twenty two pages in each issue though.

BM: Any word on the artist?

NG: …Yes.

BM: That you can share?

NG: No, I… I wish I could, but I can’t. There are some cool art plans that when people hear about them, I think it will make them go “Oh, that’s cool.” But again, I can’t share them at this point.

BM: Given your success in other media, will The Eternals be the last comic you do for the foreseeable future?

NG: I don’t know. My troubles are with time, not with things that I want to do. The novel readers would like it if I gave everything else up and did nothing but write novels for the rest of time. And the comic people would like me to do comics. It’s Sandman’s twentieth birthday in 2009, and I think I’m very much likely to do stuff for that. If only because it’ll make me feel really old. But it might be in 2008… Sandman #1 was published in November 1988, but with a cover date of January 1989. So I get to pick which is the twentieth anniversary. It’ll probably be 2009 just because I’ll be running late. I’m terrified to say that about something four years away! [laughs] But it’s true…

We did Endless Nights, which was enormously fun. I wanted to do a big pretty book and I got to do the thing. But having the first mainstream comics published original graphic novel on The New York Times’ Bestseller List… That was enormously fun and enormously satisfying to have done. Having said that, I can’t see much point in doing it again having done it. I would be much more likely to do the equivalent of a six or eight issue miniseries than I would to do an original book. It’s something that DC Comics knows I would like to do and I know they’d like me to do something. It’s not immediate so we’re worrying about different things.

The next thing that will be fun, and I don’t even know if I’m allowed to say this, but seeing that I’ve been so incredibly unhelpful on things I do know that I’m not allowed to talk about yet (laughs), I will give you one thing… I haven’t been told not to say, so I will give you something that is technically an exclusive, which is the last thing I heard that they are definitely doing is an Absolute Sandman. Because frankly, the first twenty odd issues of Sandman (in particular, but there’s more running through) were colored for a process that hasn’t been used for twenty years on that old paper stock. And now the paper stock is amazing, the print process is amazing and we’re still using the colors which look worse and worse with every printing. That’s not satisfactory. We’ve always known we needed to recolor the first two graphic novels and maybe the first couple issues of Dream Country. Steve Oliff took over on Sandman 19 and 20 and made it beautiful but at that point it was a computerized process. We’ve always wanted to recolor those and that I think, is incentive enough. The question is how are we going to do it and what will the Absolute Sandman be? For example, I don’t know whether the physical mechanics of book production will actually allow for a two thousand page book. A complete Sandman book would probably look like something encyclopedia sized. On the other hand, it would be a really cool object. And you could kill somebody if you hit them with it.

BM: It’s good to have a hobby.

NG: Absolutely. You could look at people straining themselves to pick it up saying “Oh my God… This is the whole of Sandman.” But quite what it will be… I don’t think we’ve come to that conclusion yet. But I have heard from Paul Levitz that it’s definitely going to be happening.

Sh00g4yz0r
10-11-2005, 04:00 AM
I <4 Neil Gaiman.
I love how Marvel is trying keep their projects a secret.
I wish he would of named the artist though.:(

Muze
10-11-2005, 10:47 AM
it pisses me off that the Eternals are part of the Marvel Universe. they are clutter; plain and simple. there should be humans, altered-humans (spiderman, daredevil, the inhumans, etc), deities, and mutants, imo. i would be fine with the Eternals if they existed in their own little pocket universe like the Squadron Supreme but, if they are a part of the marvel universe, i'd rather they just represent the greek gods/keep Hercules company. it just makes no sense, to me, that there are greek gods and then these imitation Eternals/Deviants.

TheCorpulent1
10-11-2005, 11:17 AM
Learning that the rumor about him and P. Craig Russell on Thor was true at one point but abandoned very nearly made me cry. What an earth-shatteringly amazing team for Thor. :(

I hope that Absolute Sandman collection really is the whole of Sandman collected. I would so hit people and kill them with it. :up:

KingOfDreams
10-11-2005, 12:26 PM
It's too bad that he didn't get to do Thor but I'm looking forward to his Eternals anyway. Gaiman rules :up:.

(I think I'm going to pick up Anansi Boys...or at least ask for it for Christmas)

Xofenroht
10-11-2005, 02:04 PM
I picked up Anansi Boys some time ago, but I haven't finished it yet. It's a very nice book, of course I'm biased, my favorite thing is the Spider on the cover (which you won't see unless you remove the dust jacket). It has seven legs, and Neil drew it himself.

On the note of "The Eternals". I really like when Neil does this with things. He takes something original or already established and re-establishes it or rather rebuilds it in his Gaiman-verse image. I feel that his best stories are told when he has centuries and centuries, maybe even millenia, to work with. I'm looking forward to this.

About the points he made about too much information given about comics these days. Everyone here knows he's right. Muze, I think, just proved him right. Knowing what's going to happen before hand pretty much ruins the story for everyone. That's why 1602 was so great, no one knew enough of anything to complain about it. Once it came out, we were able to just say "Wow", without the pre-publishing complaints and opinions we usually hear (Like with "The Other").

Marcdachamp
10-11-2005, 04:04 PM
Dammit. I don't know what to do: Buy each issue and read it, or read it all in one sitting when the trade comes out like I did with 1602. Decisions, decisions...

Anubis
10-11-2005, 04:25 PM
Really looking forward to this.

Lackey
10-11-2005, 05:11 PM
Learning that the rumor about him and P. Craig Russell on Thor was true at one point but abandoned very nearly made me cry. What an earth-shatteringly amazing team for Thor. :(



most likely part of the reason he moved on from that project is because he wouldn't have had enough control over the project

Lackey
10-11-2005, 05:14 PM
Dammit. I don't know what to do: Buy each issue and read it, or read it all in one sitting when the trade comes out like I did with 1602. Decisions, decisions...


profits from the single issues goes to the Marvels and Miracles fund while most of the profits from trades will go to Marvel.

If you want to be a help to the writer, buy the issues. :up:

KingOfDreams
10-11-2005, 05:18 PM
the Marvels and Miracles fund

What is that?

Marcdachamp
10-11-2005, 05:19 PM
profits from the single issues goes to the Marvels and Miracles fund while most of the profits from trades will go to Marvel.

If you want to be a help to the writer, buy the issues. :up:
Chances are, I'll buy both. Just not sure when to read it. :up:

Nick Eastwood
10-11-2005, 05:34 PM
Could someone correct me with this, but I read somewhere that Thor and the asgardians are actually eternals who took on the mythology of the norse religion.

Eternals have been around since forever or something, and the normal people reverred them as Norse Gods, and that's how the whole shabang got started.

euroq
10-11-2005, 05:47 PM
most likely part of the reason he moved on from that project is because he wouldn't have had enough control over the project

I dunno, I'm pretty sure Marvel would have given Gaiman all the creative freedom he wanted.


profits from the single issues goes to the Marvels and Miracles fund while most of the profits from trades will go to Marvel.

Do you know this for sure? That was the case with 1602 but I can't remember if they had the same deal with this project too.

Dread
10-11-2005, 06:46 PM
I liked Gaiman's work on 1602 but I never cared one bit for NEW GODS or Kirby's ETERNALS/DEVIANTS stuff. So it is quite perplexing. I'll likely get the first issue and see how I like it.

And it is a shame that Thor's fate was not in the hands of Gaiman and Russell. If any writer was completely unafraid of going against Marvel's "urban hero or LIMBO!" mantra these days, it's Gaiman.

Dr.Fear
10-11-2005, 07:27 PM
What is that?

i second this

TheCorpulent1
10-11-2005, 07:51 PM
Could someone correct me with this, but I read somewhere that Thor and the asgardians are actually eternals who took on the mythology of the norse religion.

Eternals have been around since forever or something, and the normal people reverred them as Norse Gods, and that's how the whole shabang got started.
I don't think they were ever Eternals. They certainly don't display the typical Eternal abilities, anyway. I know that Earth/Universe/Paradise X put forth the idea that the gods are amorphous alien types who conformed themselves to humanity's beliefs. Thus, Thor was able to change back from being turned into a woman by Asgardian "magic" simply by not believing he was a woman anymore or something. Although I didn't like Universe/Paradise X at all, I did find the idea of the gods as simply beings (not necessarily something as trite as aliens, though) who molded themselves to a human faith so closely that even after the faith had all but died out, they continued to cling to the familiar forms and traditions of it.

Dread
10-11-2005, 07:56 PM
I don't think they were ever Eternals. They certainly don't display the typical Eternal abilities, anyway. I know that Earth/Universe/Paradise X put forth the idea that the gods are amorphous alien types who conformed themselves to humanity's beliefs. Thus, Thor was able to change back from being turned into a woman by Asgardian "magic" simply by not believing he was a woman anymore or something. Although I didn't like Universe/Paradise X at all, I did find the idea of the gods as simply beings (not necessarily something as trite as aliens, though) who molded themselves to a human faith so closely that even after the faith had all but died out, they continued to cling to the familiar forms and traditions of it.
Marvel's official reasoning is that Earth/Universe/Paradise X were all an Alternate Reality, and not Canon-616, as proven in the recent OFFICIAL HANDBOOK OF THE MARVEL UNIVERSE: ALTERNATE UNIVERSES 2005 which stated all that stuff as an alternate universe. So while it's a theory, its not Marvel fact for 616.

Besides, isn't any "god" an extra-terrestrial? As in, a being that lives above humanity in the stars?

TheCorpulent1
10-11-2005, 08:00 PM
Yeah, but there's a difference between living outside of humanity and being a sci-fi alien from another world. I'd prefer for the gods of Earth to at least have their origins with Earth. Just a personal quirk, I suppose.

I know the X series is an alternate universe, and I'm incredibly thankful for it, since I thought most of it sucked. I was just pointing out that the X series put forth that idea, which might be where Nick was getting the idea from. Maybe he just mixed it up with the Eternals since we're talking about both Thor and the Eternals in here.

Nick Eastwood
10-11-2005, 08:30 PM
No, I think. Hold on, let me check, I read it in my Marvel Bible, I think:


EDIT: Okay, I guess not. I swear I read it a long time ago though.

TheCorpulent1
10-11-2005, 08:37 PM
The only thing like that I know of is the notion that the gods were actually aliens who took on the characteristics of the Norse deities of Earth. I vaguely remember reading something about it outside of the X series, too, so it might've possibly been a part of continuity at some point, too. I don't think it is anymore, though.

Lackey
10-11-2005, 09:24 PM
What is that?


It's complicated, but I found a really good short summary on Gaiman's website -

The story behind this is a long one...so I'll be over simplifying it. Neil wrote some comics for Todd McFarland and Image, creating the characters Medieval Spawn, Cagliostro and Angela. For Angela he wrote a three issue mini-series, collected as Angela's Hunt . He didn't receive royalties for any of the comics or the derivative works (such as the highly popular toys) and after awhile, Todd McFarland offered his share of the Miracleman rights. Neil already has partial rights, since Alan Moore, the original creator, gave Neil and the artist Mark Buckingham his portion of the rights...McFarland bought his from Eclipse when they went out of business. He sent Neil boxes of films that would allow him to reprint the comics, then changed his mind about allowing Neil to do anything with them. Neil attempted to resolve the issues in October 2002, where a judge decided in Neil's favor. To help defray the court costs and administer the Miracleman rights, Marvel's CEO Joe Quesada and he formed a company called Marvels and Miracles, and part of this agreement is for Neil to create two works for Marvel, of which 2003-2004's 1602 is the first. (For a more information, please visit Icv2: http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/1878.html)

Here's another source: http://www.sequart.com/marvel1602.htm

Lackey
10-11-2005, 09:32 PM
I dunno, I'm pretty sure Marvel would have given Gaiman all the creative freedom he wanted.


Well, it's just my opinion, but Neil Gaiman had said in an interview that he wanted 1602 Captain America to affect present day 616 Captain America but they didn't go for it.
I'm thinking that if his changes to Thor were too drastic, Marvel wouldn't go for it either.



Do you know this for sure? That was the case with 1602 but I can't remember if they had the same deal with this project too.

Yeah, two projects were part of the same deal.

Omegabug
10-11-2005, 10:05 PM
Is Silver Surfer involved with the Eternals at all? (Dont mind me im just getting back into comics)

Lackey
10-11-2005, 10:09 PM
Nope, but definitely pick this title up next year when it comes out...with Gaiman, you don't need to know anything about the Eternals to understand and it's practically guaranteed to be a great story.

Omegabug
10-11-2005, 10:11 PM
I most definately plan to do so. I LOVED Sandman/Death books. Im very excited!!!

TheCorpulent1
10-11-2005, 10:13 PM
Well, it's just my opinion, but Neil Gaiman had said in an interview that he wanted 1602 Captain America to affect present day 616 Captain America but they didn't go for it.
I'm thinking that if his changes to Thor were too drastic, Marvel wouldn't go for it either.
According to Oeming, they're going ahead with Millar's take on Thor as far as he knows, so I don't think drastic changes to the character were an issue.

euroq
10-11-2005, 10:33 PM
Wasn't it a Gaiman/Straczynski take on Thor that Millar was supposed to write?

TheCorpulent1
10-11-2005, 11:21 PM
Something like that, according to the rumor. Gaiman came up with the core concept and then Straczynski put a "spin" on it, whatever the hell that means. Either way, I'm dreading its eventual release and hoping that someone has the good sense to attach a creative team that actually appreciates the character instead of Millar the shock jock and Land, whose art just strikes me as all wrong for Thor.

Lackey
10-11-2005, 11:38 PM
I know of the Gaiman/JMS take on Thor, but what does Oeming have to do with it?

and will Millar and Land be the team on the title?

Anubis
10-11-2005, 11:42 PM
Oeming is the guy everybody else wants to bring Thor back.

Lackey
10-11-2005, 11:46 PM
Oh okay, well I figured that...I just didn't think he was involved in it at all at this point.

Anubis
10-11-2005, 11:49 PM
Well, nearly every interview he's had scince Disassembled, people have been asking if he's not taking over Thor then who? I guess he took it upon himself to let everybody know what was going down with the character. Pretty stand up guy if you ask me.

TheCorpulent1
10-12-2005, 08:44 AM
Oeming posts at (http://www.comicboards.com/thor/). In one thread, I think someone asked what was going on with Thor's eventual return after Blood Oath and Oeming said they were still going ahead with Millar, whenever Millar had the time to do it.

euroq
10-12-2005, 01:05 PM
On a related note, 1602 won the first Graphic Novel Quill Award

http://www.newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=46125

kirbyfan
04-30-2006, 02:05 PM
Guys I'm sure you know by now that the artist for Gaimans Eternals is John Romita Jr.

Can't wait for this series to come out! It's about time someone did some more Kirby characters!

Anubis
04-30-2006, 02:11 PM
Thats actually a very good match for the book using Romita because of the way his work is actually pretty close to Kirby's style.

euroq
05-03-2006, 01:20 AM
Gaiman posted preview art in his blog:
http://www.neilgaiman.com/journal/uploaded_images/ETRNLS001002s_color-734502.jpg

http://www.neilgaiman.com/journal/

Marcdachamp
05-03-2006, 02:01 AM
Love that JR art. Freaking gorgeous.

DBM
05-03-2006, 08:58 AM
Wow. That's a pretty sweet image. I can't wait for this.

Xofenroht
05-03-2006, 09:32 AM
Soo many things for this Summer.

Whirlysplat
05-03-2006, 01:46 PM
http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/rage/index1.htm




Fanboygasm happening now, right here, this second!

- Whirly

Ikaris-Eternal
05-03-2006, 02:42 PM
i own many of the first kirby eternals issues - and i really like the concept, but trying to include it into the MU weighed it down.

i'm excited to see what Gaiman does with these characters. Used correctly, Eternals can make a splash!

KingOfDreams
05-03-2006, 02:56 PM
Gaiman posted preview art in his blog:
http://www.neilgaiman.com/journal/uploaded_images/ETRNLS001002s_color-734502.jpg

http://www.neilgaiman.com/journal/

Holy **** that's great art. JrJr's the man. :up: