View Full Version : SILVER SURFER/ Lawrence Fishburne, Doug Jones Discussion Thread
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
[
6]
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Kelly
07-04-2006, 12:18 AM
Update on the Front Page: Surfer will be all CGI!
Looks like my Vin Diesel speculation is off. I'm actually happy that they're going state of the art CGI all the way. Keeps things consistent and means the whole "silver on" rumor was BS. :)
It can't just be T2 CGI it's got have a faint starfield within the skin kind of relfective.
Moviehole came up with this news thanks to me...I think. I told clint my speculation the same time I brought it up here and he said he'd contact some sources he knew to find out. I also linked him to Tim Story's Myspace site which he seemed unaware of. I hope he reached him that way because that way.
Edit: Just realized the story isn't on the boards here yet but it now has popped up on the Hypes front page. :)
The "silver on" was never a rumor....it was just a poll here....lol
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 12:19 AM
^ I could swear someone said (I think Carp-Man) that was a rumor swirling around online which is why the poll was created.
Edit: I see Hunter Rider started that in this thread right here:
http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9133866&postcount=663
Kelly
07-04-2006, 12:22 AM
^ I could swear someone said (I think Carp-Man) that was a rumor swirling around online which is why the poll was created.
Edit: I see Hunter Rider started that in this thread right here:
http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9133866&postcount=663
yeah he had a poll about it, and it got merged....it was just something HR thought up.....I think he's wishing he hadn't...lol
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 12:24 AM
Well it helped get that answer out of Tim Story from Clint because that's one of the issues I asked him to bring up. Cool.
Kelly
07-04-2006, 12:30 AM
Update on the Front Page: Surfer will be all CGI!
Looks like my Vin Diesel speculation is off. I'm actually happy that they're going state of the art CGI all the way. Keeps things consistent and means the whole "silver on" rumor was BS. :)
It can't just be T2 CGI it's got have a faint starfield within the skin kind of relfective.
Moviehole came up with this news thanks to me...I think. I told clint my speculation the same time I brought it up here and he said he'd contact some sources he knew to find out. I also linked him to Tim Story's Myspace site which he seemed unaware of. I hope he reached him that way because that way.
Edit: Just realized the story isn't on the boards here yet but it now has popped up on the Hypes front page. :)
Soooooo.....Sue is going to have a love triangle with a "cgi man" should be interesting....
Well I guess Fishboy's hope of a painted on silver dude is dead......
shame....:o
DOG LIPS
07-04-2006, 12:57 AM
I wonder who will do his voice?
Supreme Power
07-04-2006, 01:42 AM
I wonder who will do his voice?
As do I. :cool:
Mauser9910
07-04-2006, 01:53 AM
Maybe it's to make him less human looking than the original Surfer...
I'm cool with that, it should look even better than the Hulk.
Lobster Charlie
07-04-2006, 02:22 AM
Ehh...not holding my breath on this one. This is a near-impossible feat to pull off in a convincing fashion. Gollum being one of the exceptions of course.
I just hope they rotoscope a real actor so our actors can interact with them a lot better. I guess silver/reflective surfaces are easy to pull off than something more realistic. Hmmmm.
Retroman
07-04-2006, 02:38 AM
After all this talk from the folks at Marvel about realism and showing support for prostethics over cg i'm surprised that they're making Silver Surfer cg.No actor at all?Are they doing this because its in the best interests of the movie? Or are they doing it to save time?
zer00
07-04-2006, 02:45 AM
It's harder to do a more humanoid prosthetic suit(I'm sure someone will bring up Juggernaut, but he's not exactly humanoid looking). Always expected Surfer to be CGI. It'll probably done like the Hulk, with someone doing the movements to make it look more human then mapping overtop. And with SS being...Silver, it'll be easier to generate than human skin. Not a huge surprise at all. Just wonder who will do the voice.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 02:57 AM
After all this talk from the folks at Marvel about realism and showing support for prostethics over cg i'm surprised that they're making Silver Surfer cg.No actor at all?Are they doing this because its in the best interests of the movie? Or are they doing it to save time?
There's really no other way to portray the Silver Surfer except via CGI and as a character he should be more believeable in CGI then Golum, Kong, or The Hulk. They're going to want to do a Silver Surfer origin film down the road so Fox doesn't want to screw up that chance so they'll do it good. FF vs Doom will be playing out too and lots of practical humor per Tim.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 02:58 AM
As do I. :cool:
Should the voice sound normal or should it be enhanced via computers to sound like some surreal alien being.
Dynasty
07-04-2006, 02:59 AM
"The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie (http://www.superherohype.com/news/fantasticfournews.php?id=4459#). It's going to be incredible."
No where does it say there will be no actor, i am willing to bet anything there will still be a cast announcement.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 03:00 AM
Of course there will be a voice actor but there's really no need for an actual actor's phsyical presence in this film...in an origin film there will have to be.
Retroman
07-04-2006, 03:04 AM
It's harder to do a more humanoid prosthetic suit(I'm sure someone will bring up Juggernaut, but he's not exactly humanoid looking). Always expected Surfer to be CGI. It'll probably done like the Hulk, with someone doing the movements to make it look more human then mapping overtop. And with SS being...Silver, it'll be easier to generate than human skin. Not a huge surprise at all. Just wonder who will do the voice.
I know but all this talk -especially from Avi Arad- about wanting to see the emotion of the actor etc. made me think they'd use a mixture of both cg and prostethics.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 03:06 AM
I know what you're saying but The Silver Surfer is an exception. They can't do that with a man in a suit even if touched up w/CGI. It wouldn't look right. CGI all the way. Besides I think Avi was just second guessing himself because of the Hulk which I thought was a great character presentation that showed emotions fine. Golum showed emotion as did Kong.
Retroman
07-04-2006, 03:09 AM
^^True but doing a completely CG character is tough and very time consuming (see Hulk, Gollum).
zer00
07-04-2006, 03:12 AM
I know but all this talk -especially from Avi Arad- about wanting to see the emotion of the actor etc. made me think they'd use a mixture of both cg and prostethics.
Maybe taking his words a bit too much. When it's possible, of course. But much like the Hulk. How would a big guy painted green look running around on a big screen? No offense to those who want that. But seriously that would look bad. And prosthetic suit? Hulk might be big and green but still has green skin with fairly normal muscle structure(once again don't bring up Juggernaut, he wasn't running around in torn up pants with no shirt). I know surfer ain't huge, but to make the prosthetics look good you'd have to overlap them so much, what would be the point? And what kind of prosthetics would be used? A thin Silver suit? With thing you got "rocks" to attach to his face. With surfer you got...some sliver make up and a bit of prosthetic(kind of like Jack in B89 but not a chin or nose but more in the cheeks etc) or Mystique in the x-men movies. But a silver naked dude walking around would be mighty different than a naked super model with scales. ya dig?
and if that made no sense. It's like 5am so...I'm not in shape good....good shape
spider-neil
07-04-2006, 03:16 AM
in T2 when the t-1000 pours itself into the copter and says 'get out' was I the only one thinking 'silver surfer'?
also there is talk of doom being in this movie, hope not, leave him dead and devout the movie to the fab four the surfer and the planet eater.
Retroman
07-04-2006, 03:37 AM
Maybe taking his words a bit too much. When it's possible, of course. But much like the Hulk. How would a big guy painted green look running around on a big screen? No offense to those who want that. But seriously that would look bad. And prosthetic suit? Hulk might be big and green but still has green skin with fairly normal muscle structure(once again don't bring up Juggernaut, he wasn't running around in torn up pants with no shirt). I know surfer ain't huge, but to make the prosthetics look good you'd have to overlap them so much, what would be the point? And what kind of prosthetics would be used? A thin Silver suit? With thing you got "rocks" to attach to his face. With surfer you got...some sliver make up and a bit of prosthetic(kind of like Jack in B89 but not a chin or nose but more in the cheeks etc) or Mystique in the x-men movies. But a silver naked dude walking around would be mighty different than a naked super model with scales. ya dig?
and if that made no sense. It's like 5am so...I'm not in shape good....good shape
I understand what you're saying but i thought they were going to do something to Colossus (prostethic suit with cg enhancement).Or the technology that was used on I, Robot for the robots with the green suits.
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/2917/a3573i0stuntirobot185x1497eq.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/8003/irobot29iu.jpg
It helps the performance when the actors can actually see who they're interacting with.Maybe they're doing a variation of the I, Robot technology?
CaptainStacy
07-04-2006, 03:38 AM
I think an all cgi Surfer is the way to go...especially utilizing some new proceedures...it should give him a creepy/cool alien effect.
DOG LIPS
07-04-2006, 03:46 AM
Didn't his voice have kind of an echo effect to it in the animated series? They should do that for the movie as well, it gave a mystic, powerful feel to his voice.
Hunter Rider
07-04-2006, 03:47 AM
Interesting devlopment,I think this may hint that Jess' comments about a "love triangle" were slightly misinterpreted given i don't see Fox having Jess getting gooey over a CGI guy
Also like the part where Story says "The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie"
zer00
07-04-2006, 03:54 AM
I understand what you're saying but i thought they were going to do something to Colossus (prostethic suit with cg enhancement).Or the technology that was used on I, Robot for the robots with the green suits.
[IM]http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/2917/a3573i0stuntirobot185x1497eq.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/8003/irobot29iu.jpg[/IMG
It helps the performance when the actors can actually see who they're interacting with.Maybe they're doing a variation of the I, Robot technology?
Colossus only had a suit for long shots. Everything close was completely CGI(that didn't seem to be finished:o)
I,Robot is probably what they're doing.
Interesting devlopment,I think this may hint that Jess' comments about a "love triangle" were slightly misinterpreted given i don't see Fox having Jess getting gooey over a CGI guy
Let's hope that role is back to Alicia where it belongs:o And makes a **** load more sense.
Warhammer
07-04-2006, 04:45 AM
All CGI sounds great to me.
Angelus7181
07-04-2006, 05:45 AM
If it's quality CGI way better then irobot's then sure why not.. he is after all silver and alien like so I really didn't expect a human actor to pull it off. Lets just hope FOX doesn't screw up yet another marvle character. :mad:
JustABill
07-04-2006, 06:04 AM
Not sure what I think of this. I think we need to see emotion and therefore need an actor for him.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 06:30 AM
From SuperHeroHype!:
Who will play The Silver Surfer in the Fantastic Four sequel, appropriately titled Fantastic Four and The Silver Surfer? It appears that an actor might not even be necessary.
Moviehole talked to director Tim Story, who revealed a new bit on the character. "The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible."
20th Century Fox has scheduled a June 15 release for the follow-up, which again features Michael Chiklis, Ioan Gruffudd, Chris Evans, Jessica Alba and Julian McMahon.
Bad idea IMO :o
Willie Lumpkin
07-04-2006, 06:42 AM
As with many stories, I think we have to be careful in reading something like this.
All Tim Story said was: "The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible."
From that quote, the author speculated: "It appears that an actor might not even be necessary."
I agree with you. The author's suggestion, would be a bad idea. The should base the surfer on an actor's performance, but Tim isn't sayin they won't. The Author is making that leap.
Willie Lumpkin
07-04-2006, 06:48 AM
"The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie (http://www.superherohype.com/news/fantasticfournews.php?id=4459#). It's going to be incredible."
No where does it say there will be no actor, i am willing to bet anything there will still be a cast announcement.
Yep. I made the same comment in another thread before I saw this one.
Couldn't Tim's comment have been applied to the CGI used for King Kong, or the faces of Professor X and Magneto when they were shown younger in X-men 3?
Just saying that the CGI will be good doesn't say that they won't use an actor.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 07:05 AM
I guess...but if they do do it Hulk-style...it'd be a bad move IMO
Spider - Man
07-04-2006, 07:20 AM
They could do motion capture. I wonder what "new cgi design" is being developed? I'm intrigued!
Onlooker
07-04-2006, 07:34 AM
They seem to be including Julian McMahon in the cast now. That still wasn't completely clear.
redlion2
07-04-2006, 07:42 AM
If they do use a live actor in some capacity along with CGI, it could work. If they use all CGI.....I dunno. It certainly won't be very convincing, IMO.
liesse00
07-04-2006, 08:08 AM
"The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible."
New technology, sounds exciting. Hopefully they've been working on it, maybe we'll get a sneak peak at Comic con.
Is it any surprise that Surfer will be CGI? Given the title, I wonder if it will have Norin Rad. That part will call for an actor.
I'm really happy to hear Surfer is going to be so prominent, but disapointed to think he is going to be showcasesd in a FF movie. If it is anything like the last one.....:(
Kelly
07-04-2006, 09:04 AM
Is it any surprise that Surfer will be CGI? Given the title, I wonder if it will have Norin Rad. That part will call for an actor.
I'm really happy to hear Surfer is going to be so prominent, but disapointed to think he is going to be showcasesd in a FF movie. If it is anything like the last one.....:(
No more disappointed than I will be if he's showcased more than the other 4 just for a spin off movie of his own. The title gives me the uneasy feeling that, that is what will happen...Its an F4 film, not a stepping stone film for the SS.
Darthkush
07-04-2006, 09:09 AM
All CGI Surfer is a bad idea. I'm hoping it's a combo of live action and cgi.
As far as Mcmahon goes, who's to say he'll come back still? Even if he is returning, it could just be his voice. He may not even actually be on the set unless there are flashbacks or something.
Kahoot
07-04-2006, 09:14 AM
So I'm taking from this that the surfer will be Gollum like.
gvcool2
07-04-2006, 09:25 AM
This will never work, and I can tell you the ultimate reason why...How is Jessica Alba supposed to give a ddecent performance with a CGI if she is unable to give a decent performance with real actors
antariksh
07-04-2006, 09:27 AM
From SuperHeroHype!:
Bad idea IMO :o
You know what i find very funny is that when any news for F4-2 comes out every one starts saying that is BAD idea or sucks.
Just shows that this movie will flop big time if we fans don't support it.
Btw i like the idea of a CGI silver surfer if a company like WETA or ILM is doing the SFX for it.
But u know what I don't think it will be a completely CGI character. They will probably do it the same way they did King kong, gollum or Sonny( I robot). COOL part is that all of that was done by WETA so i think they are most probably going to choose them for the SILVER SURFER sfx.
Also John Bruno is the sfx supervisor. He did terminator 2 so i am confident the action and sfx scenes will be FANTASTIC.
redlion2
07-04-2006, 09:45 AM
This will never work, and I can tell you the ultimate reason why...How is Jessica Alba supposed to give a ddecent performance with a CGI if she is unable to give a decent performance with real actors
LOL!!
The Only Woj
07-04-2006, 09:47 AM
a CG Surfer and a live-action Thing. well done, Mr. Story, well done.
freemind1969
07-04-2006, 09:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9g3bsln_Xs&search=silver%20surfer
check out this old school cgi attempt at the surfer- (about 2 min. in)
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 09:56 AM
You can't embed video or music into these forums.
terry78
07-04-2006, 10:00 AM
I'd rather they go that route than paint some guy silver. Let's take a little stroll into the 21st century for christ's sake. Don't be the caveman afraid of fire or that round thing. Everyone said The Thing should've been CG, and SS is just as complex visually as he is.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 10:03 AM
Why not do what they did for X-Men 3 and actually get an actor and build up a metallic suit wround him like they did for Colossus?
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 10:04 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9g3bsln_Xs&search=silver%20surfer
check out this old school cgi attempt at the surfer- (about 2 min. in)
Noice
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 10:17 AM
a CG Surfer and a live-action Thing. well done, Mr. Story, well done.
Someone agrees with me if they go down that route. I just hope they don't mess it up if they have to do it CG
liesse00
07-04-2006, 10:18 AM
You guys need to calm down and wait for official word.
Darthphere
07-04-2006, 10:20 AM
Ok, so if Surfer is going to be CGI, who does the voice. Discuss.
Darthphere
07-04-2006, 10:21 AM
No more disappointed than I will be if he's showcased more than the other 4 just for a spin off movie of his own. The title gives me the uneasy feeling that, that is what will happen...Its an F4 film, not a stepping stone film for the SS.
Actually it pretty much is, sorry.:( :up:
Hunter Rider
07-04-2006, 10:22 AM
Ok, so if Surfer is going to be CGI, who does the voice. Discuss.
Wlliam Shatner would be my choice, he would bring charisma,and etheral dignity to the part \/:up:
GL's Light
07-04-2006, 10:22 AM
Interesting devlopment,I think this may hint that Jess' comments about a "love triangle" were slightly misinterpreted given i don't see Fox having Jess getting gooey over a CGI guy
Yeah, not to mention the Surfer's lack of a dipstick. That would stand in the way of a romance, methinks.
Darthphere
07-04-2006, 10:23 AM
Wlliam Shatner would be my choice, he would bring charisma,and etheral dignity to the part \/:up:
Morgan Freeman.:mad: :p
Hunter Rider
07-04-2006, 10:23 AM
Yeah, not to mention the Surfer's lack of a dipstick. That would stand in the way of a romance, methinks.
It also kills the best line the franchise could have gotten "Hey sue wanna wax my board" :D:(
Darthphere
07-04-2006, 10:23 AM
Yeah, not to mention the Surfer's lack of a dipstick. That would stand in the way of a romance, methinks.
You cant love someone if you dont have a penis? Ladies?:confused:
Hunter Rider
07-04-2006, 10:24 AM
Morgan Freeman.:mad: :p
I felt sure you would try to trump me with that other god of self promotion the Hass:( http://www.superherohype.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif
Hunter Rider
07-04-2006, 10:24 AM
You cant love someone if you dont have a penis? Ladies?:confused:
hey SS stands for Silver Surfer not Starp-on Sam:mad:
Darthphere
07-04-2006, 10:25 AM
Silver Surfer is going to steal Alicia from The Thing.
Willie Lumpkin
07-04-2006, 10:26 AM
I hope that they put an actor on-set in a green suit and then just overlay the actor with CGI.
I think that's a good possibility since (unlike Hulk, Gollum, Yoda etc.) the Surfer is the size of a normal person . . . just with a different surface.
GL's Light
07-04-2006, 10:31 AM
You cant love someone if you dont have a penis? Ladies?:confused:
You don't think a lack of willy would slow a guy down in life? I would think it'd take the zest out of anyone's lovelife.
GL's Light
07-04-2006, 10:33 AM
It'll probably be a motion capture performance - like Gollum in the Rings films.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 10:34 AM
It better be
The Geek Vault
07-04-2006, 10:36 AM
That video was pretty cool. I liked how they did him there, although when he changed the doll into himself I was half expecting him to turn it into a caprisun. I think they should do the green suit where there's an actor with the motion capture things on him. PS did anyone ever see this tv shttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7lrs0cR_0M&search=silver%20surfereries
Retroman
07-04-2006, 10:38 AM
Something like Gollum or I, Robot. It helps the other actors perfomance and the effects supervisor when someone is actually there on set.
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/2917/a3573i0stuntirobot185x1497eq.jpg
Retroman
07-04-2006, 10:42 AM
All CGI Surfer is a bad idea. I'm hoping it's a combo of live action and cgi.
As far as Mcmahon goes, who's to say he'll come back still? Even if he is returning, it could just be his voice. He may not even actually be on the set unless there are flashbacks or something.
Mcmahon is coming back...
And finally I asked Story that towards the end of the first film, it left it wide open that Doom will be back, so will he? "Yes that I can tell you. He will be back in full DOOM, not like we had him in the first film"
Fantastic Four 2 is scheduled to be released in July 4th 2007.
Source: http://www.latinoreview.com/news.php?id=236
lordofthenerds
07-04-2006, 10:43 AM
Is this really much of a surprise? Hopefully it will be a motion capture preformance like everyone's been saying.
That video was pretty cool. I liked how they did him there, although when he changed the doll into himself I was half expecting him to turn it into a caprisun. I think they should do the green suit where there's an actor with the motion capture things on him. PS did anyone ever see this tv shttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7lrs0cR_0M&search=silver%20surfereries
Yeah, I watched every episode of that before it was cancled.
Retroman
07-04-2006, 10:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9g3bsln_Xs&search=silver%20surfer
check out this old school cgi attempt at the surfer- (about 2 min. in)
Cool
terry78
07-04-2006, 10:54 AM
^Everything we do in life is ultimately to please the penis. You go to school to get a job to make money to impress the females. Or males, depending on your preference.
Retroman
07-04-2006, 10:56 AM
Colossus only had a suit for long shots. Everything close was completely CGI(that didn't seem to be finished:o)
I,Robot is probably what they're doing.
Lets hope thats what they're doing.Or we're going to hear endless whining from the actors about staring at a tennis ball.
Carp Man
07-04-2006, 11:00 AM
Who is playing The Silver Surfer?
Posted by Clint Morris on July 4, 2006
One rumour that has been making its way around the Internet in recent weeks is this one about Vin Diesel possibly playing The Silver Surfer in “The Fantastic Four 2”. I’m sure you’ve all heard it. And the rumour mill went [further] into overdrive last week, when it was announced that Diesel had left his new film “Black Water Transit” – for undisclosed reasons.
That rumour? Not true. It is on the fast track to the recycle bin. Wham. Bam. Boom. No xXx fighting alongside the troops in blue, I’m sorry to say. Whatever reason Diesel left “Transit”, has nothing to do with “FF2”.
The film’s director, Tim Story, told me this morning that although The Silver Surfer is indeed in the movie, it won’t be Vin Diesel playing him.
“No truth to it”, Story said, when asked about the Diesel rumours. “The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible”.
The Silver Surfer is a galaxy-cruising defender endowed with superhuman strength, who is able to control and direct cosmic energies, with enough force to destroy a city.
Initially, he was going to front his own picture (and probably will, sometime in the future), but the studio have decided to team him up with “The Fantastic Four” for his first movie out of the gate.
Thanks to ‘TS’
http://www.moviehole.net/news/20060704_who_is_playing_the_silver_surf.html
Here is the full article.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 11:08 AM
Ok, so if Surfer is going to be CGI, who does the voice. Discuss.
REGIS!
"Reed...is that your final answa?"
Compi716
07-04-2006, 11:19 AM
It sounds more like the actual design of the Surfer is different, meaning he won't look like the classic SS.
theShape
07-04-2006, 11:27 AM
i just hope he doesn't look lame.
Carp Man
07-04-2006, 11:27 AM
It sounds more like the actual design of the Surfer is different, meaning he won't look like the classic SS.
I really wasn't expecting it to. They love to mess with things. Try to bring it into "Modern times". Wish they would just leave the original which has worked for years the hell alone. :mad: He'll prob look like the T 1000 in Terminator.
antariksh
07-04-2006, 11:28 AM
Why not do what they did for X-Men 3 and actually get an actor and build up a metallic suit wround him like they did for Colossus?
becasue it sucked!!!!!!!!!
I personally want them to use the same technology used to create KING KONG, GOLLUM and SONNY in I ROBOT
Carp Man
07-04-2006, 11:34 AM
Why's everyone worried about him having no willie ? Has noone heard of a strap-on ? :eek: Christopher Reves was paralized. His wife didn't leave. A woody, and love have nothing to do with each other
This will never work, and I can tell you the ultimate reason why...How is Jessica Alba supposed to give a ddecent performance with a CGI if she is unable to give a decent performance with real actors
Best line of the month...:D :D :D
I agree with Story, there's no need of an actor for the CGI Silver Surfer...
Sun_Down
07-04-2006, 11:36 AM
I really hope he doesn't come out looking like Spider-Man or something. That too-fluid CGI movement completely takes me out of the moment and distracts me from what's really going on. I really want this idea to work, so here's hoping. :up:
arachnid-guy
07-04-2006, 11:36 AM
Why's everyone worried about him having no willie ? Has noone heard of a strap-on ? :eek:
bhahahahaaaaaaaaaaa....oh no MENTAL IMAGE OF SILVER SURFER IN SUSPENDERS!
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman, think of Wonder Woman!
Ahhhhhhhhh............
Glorious relief.
GL's Light
07-04-2006, 11:37 AM
Why's everyone worried about him having no willie ? Has noone heard of a strap-on ? :eek:
But it's sad to have to resort to a (silver) strap-on. :(
There's the source of the Surfer-Reed conflict - a guy with no penis meets a guy who can shape his penis into any size he wants. That's a recipe for jealous aggression if I've ever seen one.
antariksh
07-04-2006, 11:39 AM
I really hope he doesn't come out looking like Spider-Man or something. That too-fluid CGI movement completely takes me out of the moment and distracts me from what's really going on. I really want this idea to work, so here's hoping. :up:
what are u talking about spider-man was amazing!!!!!!!!!
IF they can do that kind of SFX for SILVER SURFER u can guarantee people will come in huge numbers to watch F4-2.
Of course don't make him do all what SM can!!!
Just make him look amazing and absolutely jaw dropping cool.
John Bruno will deliver. He did terminator 2 and x-men 3 and that is enough for me to know that the movie will have awesome action and well done sfx.
Willie Lumpkin
07-04-2006, 11:49 AM
I really hope he doesn't come out looking like Spider-Man or something. That too-fluid CGI movement completely takes me out of the moment and distracts me from what's really going on. I really want this idea to work, so here's hoping. :up:
I know what you mean. The movement just never looks right with CGI. It works for a character like Gollum that doesn't move like a normal person. With all the amazing things they've been able to do over the past several years, they've never been able to completely eliminate that strange look when they cut to CGI. That's the biggest reason I hope they use someone in a green suit.
Lobster Charlie
07-04-2006, 12:11 PM
I don't think a painted green man would look bad. It's all about how you shoot it. I think CG looks worse in a lot of cases. Hell, I thought the CG in I, Robot was miserable---it was way too obvious, and those brilliant animators at ILM thought it would be wise to *keyframe their animation*. Just like they did with a lot of Hulk's scenes, which is why he rarely looked convincing.
(you almost NEVER keyframe 3D animation if you can help it, kids)
In the case of Silver Surfer, yes, I can see the need for him to be CG. In the case of the Incredible Hulk--no, he doesn't need to be CG. He's just a big green man. Green is much easier to pull off convincingly. Silver is a lot harder, even though they did a pretty decent job with Colossus.
Stringer
07-04-2006, 12:38 PM
How much is the budget for FF-2? Trying to blend in some kind of new technology with a limited budget may make SS look like utter crap no matter how innovative the graphics might be.
blind_fury
07-04-2006, 12:42 PM
The Thing should be all CGI also. He's way too small.
Incrediblejeff
07-04-2006, 01:22 PM
I'm not too sure about this.It could work well or it could fail badly. I'll wait and see.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 01:37 PM
becasue it sucked!!!!!!!!!
I personally want them to use the same technology used to create KING KONG, GOLLUM and SONNY in I ROBOT
Um...no it didn't...
RedIsNotBlue
07-04-2006, 01:38 PM
I know what you mean. The movement just never looks right with CGI. It works for a character like Gollum that doesn't move like a normal person. With all the amazing things they've been able to do over the past several years, they've never been able to completely eliminate that strange look when they cut to CGI. That's the biggest reason I hope they use someone in a green suit.
CGI can be done well. King Kong looked nearly flawless. But considering the amount of time this film is getting I SERIOUSLY doubt the CGI will be that good.
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 01:40 PM
I really hope he doesn't come out looking like Spider-Man or something. That too-fluid CGI movement completely takes me out of the moment and distracts me from what's really going on. I really want this idea to work, so here's hoping. :up:
The thing is that for Spider-man it was pure hardcore animation since no one was actually going to swing like that, while with Silver Surfer it can all be Mo-Cap which is the way they should deffinetley go.
This means they would probably have the actor in green and so Jessica can try to act :p. (i actually liked Jessica's performance ya bunch of haters :D )
TO THE CGI IDEA I SAY :up: it would be most awesome and Deff a lot better than Colossus if done right :)
Zeroefalling
07-04-2006, 01:42 PM
What is with everyone using ****loads of cgi. Is it really cheaper to pay a buttload of animators and modelers over a couple of prostectic makers and puppeteers. Animatronics ...couldnt they be awesoem ....I mean its 2006. I just watced the 5th element again yesterday...the CGi was used very sparingly and it was awesome. I think the first problem with this movie is youve got the director of Barber Shop and The Firing Squad directing it. AND the further they stray from the surfers Original design the more peopel will hate it. James ACheseon said this himself when he designed spideys movie suit. ......****in marvel ....FF4 pt 1 sucked...cant wait for pt 2. Im dying to see how bad galactus will look in black leather LMAO!:down
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 01:43 PM
How come everyone hates the metallic suit?
Zeroefalling
07-04-2006, 01:43 PM
CGI can be done well. King Kong looked nearly flawless. But considering the amount of time this film is getting I SERIOUSLY doubt the CGI will be that good.
I totally agree. Marvel is turning these movies out like Activision is turning out piece of **** superhero videogames.. What happened to Time and effort?
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 01:44 PM
Money.
Zeroefalling
07-04-2006, 01:47 PM
Just a quick thing ....I am an animator. Mostly 2D traditional stuff...I do MAcromedia Flash stuff too...anyway, one of my old mentors used to say Humans are the hardest thing to animate, because the audience is human. And you can jsut tell when it looks wrong because we see peopel moving everyday. Spidey..he swings..thats fantastic so we believe it. Supes...he flies and thats fantastic, so we believe...but the silver surfer...he ****in surfs so if they go full cg and mess it up....godammit WE WILL knoW!
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 01:50 PM
LOL do you know what Animatronic is? Trust me on this one when i say Hell No!! :D
But CGI and Mo-Cap is the way too go.
edit- this post was for Zeroefallings first post :p
DOUBLE EDIT- COOL IM A 3D ANIMATOR but i know 2D as well :) AGAIN I SAY TOO YOU MO-CAP!!!!
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 01:52 PM
You have a point.
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 01:54 PM
PEOPLE IF IT'S MO-CAP YOU CAN'T GO WRONG BECAUSE WATCH THIS-....ITS BEING CAPTURED FROM A REAL PERSON!!!!!!! :D
i highly doubted it would be animated since it's easier and less work to use the Mo-Cap equipment
Kelly
07-04-2006, 01:58 PM
I think the forum just dropped a couple of I.Q. points.......wow
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 01:59 PM
I don't think a painted green man would look bad. It's all about how you shoot it. I think CG looks worse in a lot of cases. Hell, I thought the CG in I, Robot was miserable---it was way too obvious, and those brilliant animators at ILM thought it would be wise to *keyframe their animation*. Just like they did with a lot of Hulk's scenes, which is why he rarely looked convincing.
(you almost NEVER keyframe 3D animation if you can help it, kids)
In the case of Silver Surfer, yes, I can see the need for him to be CG. In the case of the Incredible Hulk--no, he doesn't need to be CG. He's just a big green man. Green is much easier to pull off convincingly. Silver is a lot harder, even though they did a pretty decent job with Colossus.
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2004/112-5/toddler.jpg
Darthphere
07-04-2006, 01:59 PM
I don't think a painted green man would look bad. It's all about how you shoot it. I think CG looks worse in a lot of cases. Hell, I thought the CG in I, Robot was miserable---it was way too obvious, and those brilliant animators at ILM thought it would be wise to *keyframe their animation*. Just like they did with a lot of Hulk's scenes, which is why he rarely looked convincing.
(you almost NEVER keyframe 3D animation if you can help it, kids)
In the case of Silver Surfer, yes, I can see the need for him to be CG. In the case of the Incredible Hulk--no, he doesn't need to be CG. He's just a big green man. Green is much easier to pull off convincingly. Silver is a lot harder, even though they did a pretty decent job with Colossus.
How many 10 foot high men do you know? 10 foot men that when getting angry grow to be almost 3 stories high or more?
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 02:00 PM
Ah, I get it.
Mo-Kap in Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance :up:
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 02:17 PM
WTF^^ i hope your joking.
Mo-Cap is the terminology animators use for motion capture :D just in case you wheren't kidding, people in these boards can be very suprising.
kedrell
07-04-2006, 02:20 PM
They could do it the way they're CGI'ing Davy Jones in POTC2.
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 02:21 PM
you mean throwing the CG on top of the character/actor ?
lol it's pretty much a way of Mo-Cap :D.
stock2mal
07-04-2006, 02:31 PM
I am still thinking that Billy Zane should do the role with a CGI overlay. This guy just LOOKS the part, and he wouldn't demand a huge paycheck. The first F4 was crap IMO. The effects were great, and although I was disappointed with The Things size and a few instances where you could tell it was a guy in a suit, I was happy overrall with the makeup effects. That is where my pleasure with the movie ended.... Tim Story is a hack, just like Brett Ratner. The difference between the two is that Brett Ratner listened to the fans TOO much, and turned X3 into a Power Rangers Saturday morning special, and Story.... Well, Story just turned the movie into a ****ing advertisement and fart joke..... Roger Corman made a better film in the 90's than Story ever will, even with the WORST line in a movie I have ever heard: "Mrs. Storm, can Susie and Johnny go to outer space with us!?"
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 02:37 PM
That is where my pleasure with the movie ended.... Tim Story is a hack, just like Brett Ratner. The difference between the two is that Brett Ratner listened to the fans TOO much, and turned X3 into a Power Rangers Saturday morning special,
ROTFLMAO :up: that was great. :D
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 02:44 PM
I am still thinking that Billy Zane should do the role with a CGI overlay. This guy just LOOKS the part, and he wouldn't demand a huge paycheck. The first F4 was crap IMO. The effects were great, and although I was disappointed with The Things size and a few instances where you could tell it was a guy in a suit, I was happy overrall with the makeup effects. That is where my pleasure with the movie ended.... Tim Story is a hack, just like Brett Ratner. The difference between the two is that Brett Ratner listened to the fans TOO much, and turned X3 into a Power Rangers Saturday morning special, and Story.... Well, Story just turned the movie into a ****ing advertisement and fart joke..... Roger Corman made a better film in the 90's than Story ever will, even with the WORST line in a movie I have ever heard: "Mrs. Storm, can Susie and Johnny go to outer space with us!?"
When did they say that?
Oh, the nineties version...it was supposed to be silly and corny.
zer00
07-04-2006, 02:44 PM
I don't think a painted green man would look bad. It's all about how you shoot it. I think CG looks worse in a lot of cases. Hell, I thought the CG in I, Robot was miserable---it was way too obvious, and those brilliant animators at ILM thought it would be wise to *keyframe their animation*. Just like they did with a lot of Hulk's scenes, which is why he rarely looked convincing.
(you almost NEVER keyframe 3D animation if you can help it, kids)
In the case of Silver Surfer, yes, I can see the need for him to be CG. In the case of the Incredible Hulk--no, he doesn't need to be CG. He's just a big green man. Green is much easier to pull off convincingly. Silver is a lot harder, even though they did a pretty decent job with Colossus.
The Hulk needs to be CGI.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 02:46 PM
The hulk will be all CGI w/animatronics per Zak Penn & Avi.
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 02:54 PM
HEY UMM i got something to tell you
MO-CAP!!!!!!!
:D he he he he he
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 02:56 PM
Ahh...now I REALLY get it.
*Futurama reference*
zer00
07-04-2006, 02:57 PM
CGI Surfer a bad idea? Riiiiight
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 03:01 PM
NO NOT RIGHT!!!
But LEFT!!!
actually no ideas are bad if planned ahead and done properly. Oh no wait this is FOX.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 03:02 PM
ROFL
But if you have to motion capture for a CG creature what's the point in doing it in the first place? Just get a friggin' actor :o
gambitfire
07-04-2006, 03:05 PM
um with mo-cap you still need an actor, he's just wearing green spandex that leave nothing too the imagination.
So i think whoever wrote the article jumped to a conclusion.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 03:11 PM
Which is waht we've already declared
SouLeSS
07-04-2006, 03:28 PM
Spiderman in the movies is mostly CGI...It could work...
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-04-2006, 03:30 PM
Just coz hes CG in the movies doesnt mean you can't tell it's CG nor that it's good.
Lobster Charlie
07-04-2006, 04:58 PM
How many 10 foot high men do you know? 10 foot men that when getting angry grow to be almost 3 stories high or more?
Never liked that aspect about the Hulk movie. It's not really necessary for the character.
Anyway...you know any hobbits? Somehow they were able to pull that off.
Lobster Charlie
07-04-2006, 04:58 PM
The Hulk needs to be CGI.
No he doesn't.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 04:59 PM
^ He absoloutely needs to be CGI for the action shots combined w/Animatronics for close up's and other shots. Avi agrees, Zak Penn agrees, and most others agree.
Advanced Dark
07-04-2006, 05:00 PM
How many 10 foot high men do you know? 10 foot men that when getting angry grow to be almost 3 stories high or more?
How man green monsters do you know who's been exposed to gamma radiation. What does that limit you to growing wider and not taller? This is fantasy and fun...nothing more.
antariksh
07-04-2006, 05:09 PM
I hate this thread. No one here is discussing about the CGI everyone is just making fun of each other and daying it will suck. GO GET A LIFE!!!
I hope when the TEASER comes out it will shut everyone's mouth.
:thing: :thing: :thing:
Antonello Blueberry
07-04-2006, 05:23 PM
Really, what's so wrong about the metallic Colossus in the X-Men movie? Wouldn't it be easier to have the actor on set to interact with the FF and then covering him in silver CGI, so mantaining his facial expressions (or inexpression if they cast Keanu Reeves)? And who will give the voice to the character?
jacque
07-04-2006, 05:31 PM
Boris Kodjoe should play the surfer. He looks just like him.
Who should play the Silver Surfer in the Fantastic 4 sequel? (http://www.buzzme.us/viewtopic.php?t=32&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=)
ultimatefan
07-04-2006, 05:34 PM
Can´t these people take ONE ****ING RIGHT DECISION? Two words for you, Mr Story... motion capture. Actually, just one... WETA.
Willie Lumpkin
07-04-2006, 05:45 PM
Can´t these people take ONE ****ING RIGHT DECISION? Two words for you, Mr Story... motion capture. Actually, just one... WETA.
Maybe that's exactly what he's hinting.
ultimatefan
07-04-2006, 05:57 PM
Maybe that's exactly what he's hinting.
But you still need an actor to do the motion capture. he soiunded like he was dismissing any potential actors for the part - not that Vin Diesel was a good idea anyway...
Willie Lumpkin
07-04-2006, 06:20 PM
But you still need an actor to do the motion capture. he soiunded like he was dismissing any potential actors for the part - not that Vin Diesel was a good idea anyway...
It may sound that way, but that can't be what he means. What are they going to do for the voice? Use a computer generated one? I think he's just saying they're not using Vin Diesel . . . oh, and by the way, we have some really cool CGI we're going to unveil for this.
Here's the quote:
“No truth to it”, Story said, when asked about the Diesel rumours. “The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible”.
liesse00
07-04-2006, 06:24 PM
Read the board.
DEMONS BLOOD
07-04-2006, 07:22 PM
O.K.,I did read the board and I know they said that they are going to use CGI(which I'd rather see a live action Surfer myself!!!:up: ) for the Silver Surfer.
But to answer the question posed on this thread,I'd like to see Vin Diesel as the surfer.
The guy might not be the greatest actor in the world but he does have the build for it.
Kelly
07-04-2006, 07:32 PM
Wow, losing I.Q. points and the topic....lol
The Apatow Crew
07-04-2006, 07:34 PM
What the hell? I'm i in the right thread?
DOG LIPS
07-04-2006, 07:34 PM
EVERY CGI talk turns into Hulk-time. :(
gvcool2
07-04-2006, 09:06 PM
people talk **** about vin diesel for no real reason, I bet 90% of the people flaming him enjoyed xXx & Fast & Furious and clearly have no idea about his genuine acting abilities
blind_fury
07-04-2006, 09:10 PM
The reason people are nominating Vin Diesel is because he has a bald head. It's retarded.
bcd90
07-04-2006, 09:32 PM
I think its necessary to make a CGI surfer.
Super Flight
07-04-2006, 10:00 PM
I thinks all CGI Silver surfer is a great idea! an actor all painted silver anyways would look stupid
Correction- motion capture CGI
Super Flight
07-04-2006, 10:01 PM
The reason people are nominating Vin Diesel is because he has a bald head. It's retarded.
HAHAHAHA EXACTLY!
Ratcrawler
07-04-2006, 11:42 PM
If I wanna see a guy painted silver, I'll go to Times Square. If Silver Surfer is as believeable as I, Robot's Sonny then I'm all for this.
WorthyStevens
07-05-2006, 12:12 AM
I'm VERY leery about this idea, if it does come to pass. However, if SS turns out like Gollum or Sonny, then I'll eat my words.
I just don't want my Surfer to end up being soulless CGI. :o
Antonello Blueberry
07-05-2006, 03:48 AM
The reason people are nominating Vin Diesel is because he has a bald head. It's retarded.
No, they do because in the past he said he was interested in the role. He's a fan.
blind_fury
07-05-2006, 04:29 AM
Nic Cage was a huge fan of Supes, but nobody wanted him to play Superman.
Face it, people nominated Vin Diesel because he's bald not because he's a "fan".
I guess...but if they do do it Hulk-style...it'd be a bad move IMO Hmm, Hulk was done like T-1000, Gollum, Kong etc. Or did you mean that?
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 07:49 AM
No, it's just, look, I love those movies and the characters, but it's like just because we can create things with a computer that's the one and only and easy otpion the director has. All he has to do is throw money at the animators and it will get done, I just think an actor would be a lot better, even though I love CG, and characters liek Hulk, King Kong, Gollum, etc, I just think CG is just being used WAY too much, it has to be used sparingly IMO.
Lightning Strykez!
07-05-2006, 07:51 AM
I'd rather they go that route than paint some guy silver. Let's take a little stroll into the 21st century for christ's sake. Don't be the caveman afraid of fire or that round thing. Everyone said The Thing should've been CG, and SS is just as complex visually as he is.
Agreed.
antariksh
07-05-2006, 08:01 AM
If I wanna see a guy painted silver, I'll go to Times Square. If Silver Surfer is as believeable as I, Robot's Sonny then I'm all for this.
Ya and i am sure it will be.
As long as WETA is doing the sfx for SILVER SURFER we will be happy.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 08:07 AM
Weta did some spesh fx for X3 o_O
TheSaintofKillers
07-05-2006, 08:56 AM
The surfer is an alien in human form. There is NO reasons to make him CGI. NONE.
It would be like making Superman CGI because he can fly. (and by that I mean having no actor play him, only CGI the whole movie).
Or nightcrawler in full CGI.
The surfer is only ONE color. They just need to make a great actor bald, and work their movie magic on him. Brandon Routh was an actor, and yet you believe he can fly and throw a car. Because of FX.
Jesus, Fox always find a way to remind me they can get lower...
antariksh
07-05-2006, 08:57 AM
I'm VERY leery about this idea, if it does come to pass. However, if SS turns out like Gollum or Sonny, then I'll eat my words.
I just don't want my Surfer to end up being soulless CGI. :o
To be honest with you i always found him to be soulless in the comic books. He had no emition whatsoever. No feelings whatsoever. :o
antariksh
07-05-2006, 08:58 AM
Weta did some spesh fx for X3 o_O
Ya i think they did the last PHEONIX scene.
gvcool2
07-05-2006, 09:00 AM
To be honest with you i always found him to be soulless in the comic books. He had no emition whatsoever. No feelings whatsoever. :o
hes origin story says otherwise
Casius--J
07-05-2006, 09:13 AM
Im all for motion capture cgi, thats what i thought they was gonna do. As they did for spawn, gollum and im sure collossus.
gvcool2
07-05-2006, 09:18 AM
Im all for motion capture cgi, thats what i thought they was gonna do. As they did for spawn, gollum and im sure collossus.
spawn and collusus wern't mo-cap i don't think
Kahoot
07-05-2006, 11:42 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9g3bsln_Xs&search=silver%20surfer
check out this old school cgi attempt at the surfer- (about 2 min. in)
Now there is a super power! The power to turn Action Figures into your own likeness.
Matt312
07-05-2006, 11:47 AM
Even if SS is CGI, wouldn't they need a real actor for a SS spin off(HULK)?
Super Flight
07-05-2006, 11:50 AM
OMG.. wht do you all want freaking Puppets?? yea..thats so much better then CGI....
CGI is the best thing they can do, and it looks great and you all freakin know it, so stop complaining
terry78
07-05-2006, 12:20 PM
The Silver Surfer looks human, but as far as his emotions....he is basically artificial. He may still have a humanoid soul, but he's basically viewed as robotic at times, almost like Vision(coincidentally, a character that is long overdue for live action.)
I thinks all CGI Silver surfer is a great idea! an actor all painted silver anyways would look stupid
Yup, totally agree: you just hit the jackpot!
Sun_Down
07-05-2006, 01:03 PM
CGI is the best thing they can do, and it looks great and you all freakin know it, so stop complaining
I thought Spider-Man's CGI form looked like utter crap and was in no way believable. So, no I don't "know it".
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 01:34 PM
Haaha someone agrees
GhostPoet
07-05-2006, 01:40 PM
Man, this is the best idea yet. :) Personally, I don't think any actor could do the Sufer justice...he NEEDS to be CGI. And it'll look incredible.
GhostPoet
07-05-2006, 01:41 PM
I thought Spider-Man's CGI form looked like utter crap and was in no way believable. So, no I don't "know it".
Really? I thought it was fantastic. It was the only way to capture some moves that only the Spiderman (or cgi) in the comic could do...but no life person could ever do.
Wilhelm-Scream
07-05-2006, 01:45 PM
If they make a completely CG Silver Surfer, but not a completely CG Thing, I will find them and throw pigs blood and used hypodermic needles on them.:mad:
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 01:48 PM
Someone applauded Tim Story for that for making such a dumb decision.
wobbly
07-05-2006, 01:53 PM
All CGI isnt the best option and it isnt necessary either. A CGI effect over the top of an actor in an appropriate suit will do the job just fine (the best CGI effects are when real footage is adapted rather than completely made on computer, like how they did the Torch's effects in FF1).
I'm also wondering now if they are gonna go with a satin metallic look like this:
http://www.jccomics.com/SilverSurferMiniBust.jpg
or a shiny reflective silver look:
http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/news_images/651_998_1.jpg
I know the latter is more accurate to how the books intend him to look, but I do think the former does look a little better and might work better on screen.
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 01:55 PM
It's probably going to be the metallic one
Carp Man
07-05-2006, 02:02 PM
http://www.jccomics.com/SilverSurferMiniBust.jpg
or a shiny reflective silver look:
http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/news_images/651_998_1.jpg
Don't care for either one, but if you held a gun to my head and said chose, I would say the top one is closser in keeping with the original. The one on the bottom would look like the T 100. That liquis silve look hust would not work.
GhostPoet
07-05-2006, 02:02 PM
I guess I just don't understand why some people are so completely against a CGI Surfer...seems like the most logical way to go for me. Why have a guy dress up a suit and apply special effects when you can go for a full-on shiney silver silver, just like in the comics. Someone who looks JUST like the Surfer.
Rizor
07-05-2006, 02:05 PM
I think over reliance on CG to create the character is a bad idea, especially if they go with the "no actor" approach. I think the most successful CG characters have been those which used performers to guide the CGI work. And for a character that's basically human in anatomy, etc., it would be easy enough to get a guy to do motion capture for the whole thing.
Kahoot
07-05-2006, 02:08 PM
I'm also wondering now if they are gonna go with a satin metallic look like this:
http://www.jccomics.com/SilverSurferMiniBust.jpg
Or a shiny reflective silver look:
http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/news_images/651_998_1.jpg
I'd think something in the middle but more like the top one than the bottom.
Wilhelm-Scream
07-05-2006, 02:10 PM
http://www.jccomics.com/SilverSurferMiniBust.jpgPlease Jesus, that one.
wobbly
07-05-2006, 02:22 PM
I guess I just don't understand why some people are so completely against a CGI Surfer...seems like the most logical way to go for me. Why have a guy dress up a suit and apply special effects when you can go for a full-on shiney silver silver, just like in the comics. Someone who looks JUST like the Surfer.
I think the problem with a full-on shiny surfer is all that moving reflective surface would be rather distractive (The T-1000 is one example and there's an also an old fan-made cgi effort floating around the web that does shows just how distractingly off that effect might look, especially on the face, even with state of the art effects). So for my money a more satin look would probably work better.
And I'm not personally against all-cgi, but I'd rather that option only used when it is necessary, ie when dealing with a character of inhuman proportions (like King Kong, Dinosaurs, or the Hulk) or is performing physical actions beyond anything a human can do (ie, Spider-mans more extreme web-slinging).
I think until the technology can render a truly convincing human figure (and not 99% convincing, but the full 100) there will always be that 'uncanny valley' that will put viewers off.
Willie Lumpkin
07-05-2006, 02:23 PM
When I read a thread like this, I'm sort of glad I'm not Tim Story.
How can a phrase like: "The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible." lead to a 5 page discussion that's showing no sign of ending.
Did he really even say anything?
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 02:23 PM
I think over reliance on CG to create the character is a bad idea, especially if they go with the "no actor" approach. I think the most successful CG characters have been those which used performers to guide the CGI work. And for a character that's basically human in anatomy, etc., it would be easy enough to get a guy to do motion capture for the whole thing.
I do agree with you, but, technically, if you have a role in the film, that talks or does actions, it's a bit hard not to have an actor (Andy Serkis = King Kong) lol
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 02:24 PM
When I read a thread like this, I'm sort of glad I'm not Tim Story.
How can a phrase like: "The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible." lead to a 5 page discussion that's showing no sign of ending.
Did he really even say anything?
I looked at the IMDb page for Fantastic Four last year and it had Tim Story. I was unfortunate enough to have watched Taxi the next night...and I was all like "TIm Story...where've I heard that name before?"
DAMN YOU FOX!!! I wish they got Chris Columbus to direct, to be honest.
Willie Lumpkin
07-05-2006, 02:31 PM
When I read a thread like this, I'm sort of glad I'm not Tim Story.
How can a phrase like: "The Surfer will be a new CGI design being developed especially for the movie. It's going to be incredible." lead to a 5 page discussion that's showing no sign of ending.
Did he really even say anything?
Actually, I take that back. If I was Tim Story, I would have a lot of fun with this. I would be saying things like: "Well I'm studying some of the classic marvel works and state of the art CGI techniques in preparation for this project. I've currently go Howard the Duck and Tron in my DVD changer, and I'm learning quite a bit."http://forums.wdwmagic.com/images/smilies/lol.gif
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 02:33 PM
Rofl
gerbstat
07-05-2006, 02:41 PM
http://members.aol.com/gerbstat/sanitized.jpg
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 02:45 PM
Um...what?
Super Flight
07-05-2006, 03:35 PM
I guess you guys dont watch movies am i correct? because if you hate CGI then you mostly hate every single movie...
Super Flight
07-05-2006, 03:38 PM
Someone applauded Tim Story for that for making such a dumb decision.
why do you hate CGI so much? it looks great in so many movies
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 03:54 PM
I don't hate CG so much, I hate this desicion to make SIlver Surfer all CG.
It's like Brett Ratner: Tim Sotry's only doing a film the easiest and the laziest way possible and throwing money every which way and hope it makes some serious dough back
Franklin Richards
07-05-2006, 03:55 PM
People get mad when the Hulk is CGI.
People get mad when the Thing isn't CGI.
People get mad when the Surfer is CGI.
I give up.
:ff: :ff: :ff:
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 03:58 PM
I didn't get mad at CG hulk, I think that's brilliant.
I didn't get mad at Thing not being CG, it's brillaint.
I don't give up.
antariksh
07-05-2006, 04:03 PM
People get mad when the Hulk is CGI.
People get mad when the Thing isn't CGI.
People get mad when the Surfer is CGI.
I give up.
:ff: :ff: :ff:
EXACTLY if hulk was in a suit like The thing people would have been mad.
if the The thing was CGI fans we would have whined that it would turn out like Hulk.
I mean common these people (FANS) can't make up their minds.
They are just uh CAN'T SAY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Inhuman63
07-05-2006, 04:08 PM
An all CGI Surfer may not be bad at all. Considering I know nothing about the script or how the Surfer will be utlized or anything, this may be a good thing. I know that he has a human anatomy but the man is from outer space and they may need to go that route depending on how they want to utilize him. As long as Galactus is not CGI but a big dude in a purple suit with a big purple hat, I'm good. LOL.:)
Super Flight
07-05-2006, 04:26 PM
I don't hate CG so much, I hate this desicion to make SIlver Surfer all CG.
It's like Brett Ratner: Tim Sotry's only doing a film the easiest and the laziest way possible and throwing money every which way and hope it makes some serious dough back
if he turns out looking like collossus then i'd get mad, but if he looks like something out of ILM or king kong, i'll be really happy
It depends who is going to be the artist, the artist is the one who is going to make it look good or bad
Ultimate Movie-Man
07-05-2006, 04:37 PM
if he turns out looking like collossus then i'd get mad
What's so bad about this:
http://www.canmag.com/images/front/xmen/char-colossus.jpg
Super Flight
07-05-2006, 05:59 PM
What's so bad about this:
http://www.canmag.com/images/front/xmen/char-colossus.jpg
It looked nothing like that in the movie!!
Kelly
07-05-2006, 06:43 PM
What's so bad about this:
http://www.canmag.com/images/front/xmen/char-colossus.jpg
IMHO....absolutely nothing...
Kelly
07-05-2006, 06:46 PM
Well hell if they didn't come up with something what would fanboys have to ***** about...?????? All CGI, part CGI, no CGI, someone is going to *****......we must all understand this, and be ready....lol
So lets see....what do we have so far...
1). Sue most powerful...
2). Original or Ultimate SS and/or Galactus...
3). CGI or not SS...
4). Love triangle...
5). Jessica as Sue...
6). ???Doom???
7). Non-CGI Thing...
8). Time factor...
9). Fox in general...
Did I miss any????:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Hunter Rider
07-05-2006, 06:51 PM
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
GL's Light
07-05-2006, 06:54 PM
Well hell if they didn't come up with something what would fanboys have to ***** about...?????? All CGI, part CGI, no CGI, someone is going to *****......we must all understand this, and be ready....lol
So lets see....what do we have so far...
1). Sue most powerful...
2). Original or Ultimate SS and/or Galactus...
3). CGI or not SS...
4). Love triangle...
5). Jessica as Sue...
6). ???Doom???
7). Non-CGI Thing...
8). Time factor...
9). Fox in general...
Did I miss any????:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
10. Tim Story directing...
11. Budget too low...
12. SS should have his own film...
Not saying I agree with all of that - but those are some more general complaints being lobbed around.
gambitfire
07-05-2006, 07:11 PM
and the people who fill in the majority of seats just want too see explosions.
Let's face it today's public is easily impressed with booms and bams. My friends MOM just told me X3 had too much talking, i thought it didn't have enough.
Fantastic Four did good i mean i liked it but i know it lacked. Yet the appeal of the movie was 2 high profile celebrities and the Human Torch and other FX :p. Batman and Superman have been excellent movies IMO but movies that i feel are only eye candy are doing better. It's what the world is coming too and it sucks.
gambitfire
07-05-2006, 07:12 PM
^i blame television too many ppl have ADD :D :p
Kahoot
07-05-2006, 07:32 PM
and the people who fill in the majority of seats just want too see explosions.
Explosions and Jessica Alba's Boobs in a tight spandex one peace :)
You also said something about, "2 high profile celebrities" Alba isn't really A-class and I don't know who you'd think the other one is, maybe Nip/Tuck man who's name I don't even know.
Kelly
07-05-2006, 07:49 PM
10. Tim Story directing...
11. Budget too low...
12. SS should have his own film...
Not saying I agree with all of that - but those are some more general complaints being lobbed around.
10. As far as Tim Story directing...yes that is one I could have put up there, BUT many believe the first movie not to truly be his movie...I'm one of those.....so thats where my Fox in general comes from....
11. How can we be upset about a budget we don't know what it is....so thats too early...
12. Most of the fanboys I've seen around here are happy that the SS is being introduced with the F4 movie, which is how it was in the comics, so why not in the movie?
GL's Light
07-05-2006, 07:54 PM
10. As far as Tim Story directing...yes that is one I could have put up there, BUT many believe the first movie not to truly be his movie...I'm one of those.....so thats where my Fox in general comes from....
11. How can we be upset about a budget we don't know what it is....so thats too early...
12. Most of the fanboys I've seen around here are happy that the SS is being introduced with the F4 movie, which is how it was in the comics, so why not in the movie?
I've seen a fair amount of complaining about SS being in this film - although it's mostly from people who didn't like FF 1 and think FF 2 will screw up SS and that he deserves his own film instead.
I've also seen some folks complain in advance about the budget even though we don't know what it'll be - y'know comments like "Fox is a cheap studio, so SS and Galactus won't look good."
gambitfire
07-05-2006, 08:03 PM
Explosions and Jessica Alba's Boobs in a tight spandex one peace :)
You also said something about, "2 high profile celebrities" Alba isn't really A-class and I don't know who you'd think the other one is, maybe Nip/Tuck man who's name I don't even know.
i ment Julian McMahnon i think that's how you spell it.
Alba deff, A-list, she's freaking everywhere.
Oh and the rest of the cast is well known. Except for Gruffudd, i fell on the floor laughing when i realized he was the guy from 102 Dalmations, i think he's good but that was still funny.
wobbly
07-05-2006, 08:10 PM
I've seen a fair amount of complaining about SS being in this film - although it's mostly from people who didn't like FF 1 and think FF 2 will screw up SS and that he deserves his own film instead.
I've also seen some folks complain in advance about the budget even though we don't know what it'll be - y'know comments like "Fox is a cheap studio, so SS and Galactus won't look good."
Both FF1 and X3 cost more than many block-busters by other studios do, so I wouldn't call them cheap.
I would however (on viewing the final results) question just what they manage to spend so much money on.
GL's Light
07-05-2006, 08:12 PM
Both FF1 and X3 cost more than many block-busters by other studios do, so I wouldn't call them cheap.
I would however (on viewing the final results) question just what they manage to spend so much money on.
Again, these aren't charges that I'm making. I was just relaying some of the complaints I've heard for the list that was being put together.
gambitfire
07-05-2006, 08:48 PM
Both FF1 and X3 cost more than many block-busters by other studios do, so I wouldn't call them cheap.
I would however (on viewing the final results) question just what they manage to spend so much money on.
visual effects. that's all these movies are really good visual effects. All story is lost behind that.
ScrnNmsSuck
07-05-2006, 08:50 PM
All story is lost behind that.
Sad but true
Kelly
07-05-2006, 08:53 PM
Again, these aren't charges that I'm making. I was just relaying some of the complaints I've heard for the list that was being put together.
My list was compiled out of sarcasm more than anything else.....most of those complaints I do not share....and I have hope that the sequel will be much better than the first. My complaint really is in the editing, and as of right now I haven't seen Hoy on any list....as far as the SS, I don't really care how he is done as long as it is done well, and he does not overshadow the real heros of this movie the 4 themselves. So really as far as I'm concerned, my complaints run more from sarcasm, because I am one that waits and makes my final decision after I've seen the actual movie. If they fix the editing, and focus on the 4...I have a feeling I'll be a happy camper...:)
GL's Light
07-05-2006, 08:57 PM
My list was compiled out of sarcasm more than anything else.....most of those complaints I do not share....and I have hope that the sequel will be much better than the first. My complaint really is in the editing, and as of right now I haven't seen Hoy on any list....as far as the SS, I don't really care how he is done as long as it is done well, and he does not overshadow the real heros of this movie the 4 themselves. So really as far as I'm concerned, my complaints run more from sarcasm, because I am one that waits and makes my final decision after I've seen the actual movie. If they fix the editing, and focus on the 4...I have a feeling I'll be a happy camper...:)
I got that it was a sarcastic list. I was giving you a couple more fanboy complaints to add to it.
I thought the editor of FF 1 was coming back for FF 2. Pretty sure I read that on a thread recently.
Kelly
07-05-2006, 09:01 PM
I got that it was a sarcastic list. I was giving you a couple more fanboy complaints to add to it.
I thought the editor of FF 1 was coming back for FF 2. Pretty sure I read that on a thread recently.
The only ones I have seen so far are the producers, director, actors, special effect technician and production manager as far as the same....maybe Frost along with the other 2 writers....
As far as others, there has been multiple changes...and Hoy has not been mentioned....not on any thread around here, and he's not on any cast/crew lists either...BUT then again, there is no editor yet on any cast/crew list....
Hoy at the moment is the editor for "300"....but there is no mention of F4 2 and I hope it stays that way...
GL's Light
07-05-2006, 09:10 PM
The only ones I have seen so far are the producers, director, actors, special effect technician and production manager as far as the same....maybe Frost along with the other 2 writers....
As far as others, there has been multiple changes...and Hoy has not been mentioned....not on any thread around here, and he's not on any cast/crew lists either...BUT then again, there is no editor yet on any cast/crew list....
Hoy at the moment is the editor for "300"....but there is no mention of F4 2 and I hope it stays that way...
Could well be faulty memory on my part.
Kelly
07-05-2006, 09:12 PM
Could well be faulty memory on my part.
"300" is in post-production so unfortunately there is still a chance he could come in...
Retroman
07-06-2006, 02:51 AM
I have no problem with the CG unless the actors have someone they can interact with on set instead of looking at a tennis ball.For an example check out the videos at the links.
http://www.digitaldomain.com/links/features/behindscenes/robot2/image_5.gifhttp://www.digitaldomain.com/links/features/behindscenes/robot2/image_6.gifhttp://www.digitaldomain.com/links/features/behindscenes/robot2/image_7.gif
http://www.digitaldomain.com/links/features/behindscenes/robot2/robot2.htm
http://www.digitaldomain.com/links/features/behindscenes/robot1/robot1.htm
Philly Phanboy
07-06-2006, 09:48 AM
All CGI isnt the best option and it isnt necessary either. A CGI effect over the top of an actor in an appropriate suit will do the job just fine (the best CGI effects are when real footage is adapted rather than completely made on computer, like how they did the Torch's effects in FF1).
I'm also wondering now if they are gonna go with a satin metallic look like this:
http://www.jccomics.com/SilverSurferMiniBust.jpg
or a shiny reflective silver look:
http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/news_images/651_998_1.jpg
I know the latter is more accurate to how the books intend him to look, but I do think the former does look a little better and might work better on screen.
A CGI Surfer wouldn't be a bad idea if done right and personally I like the satin metallic look too. It'll also make him look less like the T1000.
On another note, Tim Story has debunked the Vin Diesel as Surfer connection, but has he mentioned anything about Laurence Fishburne's possible interest? A CGI Surfer might just be the way which would allow Fishburne to play the role of his favourite character. :cool:
Willie Lumpkin
07-06-2006, 10:21 AM
A CGI Surfer wouldn't be a bad idea if done right and personally I like the satin metallic look too. It'll also make him look less like the T1000.
On another note, Tim Story has debunked the Vin Diesel as Surfer connection, but has he mentioned anything about Laurence Fishburne's possible interest? A CGI Surfer might just be the way which would allow Fishburne to play the role of his favourite character. :cool:
I didn't know he was interested. Voicewise, he'd probably be at the top of my list of names I've heard suggested so far.
terry78
07-06-2006, 10:28 AM
^In the vein of Keith David as Goliath, and Carl Lumbly as Martian Manhunter....Laurence Fishburne is Silver Surfer. That could work.
Gamma Ray
07-06-2006, 10:52 AM
Tim Story sucks. How can he be excited about using CGI after the crappy effects from the first film?
xii22_loop
07-06-2006, 11:20 AM
guess like with X-men and X-men 2 theres always a slight improvment on everything the second time around?
Retroman
07-06-2006, 11:39 AM
A CGI Surfer wouldn't be a bad idea if done right and personally I like the satin metallic look too. It'll also make him look less like the T1000.
On another note, Tim Story has debunked the Vin Diesel as Surfer connection, but has he mentioned anything about Laurence Fishburne's possible interest? A CGI Surfer might just be the way which would allow Fishburne to play the role of his favourite character. :cool:
I didn't know he was a fan.There seem to be some pretty big names who like the Surfer. Hope Fox are doing their homework.
Kahoot
07-06-2006, 12:29 PM
^In the vein of Keith David as Goliath, and Carl Lumbly as Martian Manhunter....Laurence Fishburne is Silver Surfer. That could work.
Keith David what a voice, Goliath and Spawn... Fishburne as the Surfer would rock. I can see it now though, one off issues and minis about the Silver Surfer in the Matrix.
Philly Phanboy
07-06-2006, 01:55 PM
I didn't know he was a fan.There seem to be some pretty big names who like the Surfer. Hope Fox are doing their homework.
I couldn't find the original interview but here's the post with a synopsis - link (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8270329&postcount=181)
Retroman
07-06-2006, 02:01 PM
I couldn't find the original interview but here's the post with a synopsis - link (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8270329&postcount=181)
Thanks:cool: :up:
Zilleraut #66
07-06-2006, 02:57 PM
I've always been a huge Surfer fan and I'm not really opposed to seeing a CGI SS. I'll hold off on any comments until I see it. I've always liked Chow Yun Fan for the Surfer. Bald head aside I like his bold yet kind voice and halted English. Just please do this character justice!!!
Willie Lumpkin
07-06-2006, 03:06 PM
I couldn't find the original interview but here's the post with a synopsis - link (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8270329&postcount=181)
:up: Cool! I think he's the best option so far.
ISHMAEL
07-06-2006, 04:20 PM
Tim Story sucks. How can he be excited about using CGI after the crappy effects from the first film?
i know mr. fantastic looked hella fake
echostation
07-06-2006, 04:25 PM
look, he's got the skills... after all he did direct Taxi where reviews said the following:
"A surprisingly funny, female-driven romp -- as long as you don't question too many plot particulars." - USA TODAY
"An example of the sort of fun you can have when you're not taking yourself -- or the job -- too seriously." - DETROIT FREE PRESS
"Latifah and Fallon are an unlikely comedy team but they keep the laugh meter running" - JACKIECOOPER.COM
"Corny, but it grows on you." - MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE
After those sorts of kick ass reviews, give the man a chance... he'll deliver this time around... I GUARANTEE IT says the Men's Wear House suits guy.
Look at how those reviews demonstrate how CLEARLY HE FITS the Fantastic Four directorial mantle. Look at how those prove that he will easily be capable of handling the extremely deep emotionally complex and layered story of the Silver Surfer alongside Galactus... look at it... "the laugh meter running..." "corny, but it grows on you..." This is exactly the kind of positive vibe that will kindle the genius fire of Silver Surfer being brought to screen... he will share a buddy-buddy bad cop good cop type relationship with Galactus... it will be brilliant, just wait for it.
DACrowe
07-06-2006, 04:43 PM
I don't know, I don't think it will work. Oh well though.
Kelly
07-06-2006, 04:54 PM
I don't know, I don't think it will work. Oh well though.
LOL, why am I not surprised....
Zilleraut #66
07-06-2006, 05:09 PM
look, he's got the skills... after all he did direct Taxi where reviews said the following:
"A surprisingly funny, female-driven romp -- as long as you don't question too many plot particulars." - USA TODAY
"An example of the sort of fun you can have when you're not taking yourself -- or the job -- too seriously." - DETROIT FREE PRESS
"Latifah and Fallon are an unlikely comedy team but they keep the laugh meter running" - JACKIECOOPER.COM
"Corny, but it grows on you." - MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE
After those sorts of kick ass reviews, give the man a chance... he'll deliver this time around... I GUARANTEE IT says the Men's Wear House suits guy.
Look at how those reviews demonstrate how CLEARLY HE FITS the Fantastic Four directorial mantle. Look at how those prove that he will easily be capable of handling the extremely deep emotionally complex and layered story of the Silver Surfer alongside Galactus... look at it... "the laugh meter running..." "corny, but it grows on you..." This is exactly the kind of positive vibe that will kindle the genius fire of Silver Surfer being brought to screen... he will share a buddy-buddy bad cop good cop type relationship with Galactus... it will be brilliant, just wait for it.BWAHAHAHAHAHA... Does anyone remember the Taxi plants on the movie boards?
liverlips
07-06-2006, 06:02 PM
I REALLY want to be positive about this but it looks like the same old Fox runaround. I don't get how Namor is gonna be shoved in. I meant we are getting the Silver Surfer and most likely Galactus and Doom again. I am pretty sure they are gonna make Sue and SS have some romantic tension like they created with Doom. So sick of these cliche storylines.
I think Namor should be saved for another sequel; I'm glad they decided to use Surfer in this one as I don't think either one could carry their own movie.
Fantastic-Boy
07-06-2006, 06:22 PM
CGI 100% Support!!!
Kelly
07-06-2006, 07:48 PM
BWAHAHAHAHAHA... Does anyone remember the Taxi plants on the movie boards?
Ummmm.....no
Kelly
07-06-2006, 08:01 PM
look, he's got the skills... after all he did direct Taxi where reviews said the following:
"A surprisingly funny, female-driven romp -- as long as you don't question too many plot particulars." - USA TODAY
"An example of the sort of fun you can have when you're not taking yourself -- or the job -- too seriously." - DETROIT FREE PRESS
"Latifah and Fallon are an unlikely comedy team but they keep the laugh meter running" - JACKIECOOPER.COM
"Corny, but it grows on you." - MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE
After those sorts of kick ass reviews, give the man a chance... he'll deliver this time around... I GUARANTEE IT says the Men's Wear House suits guy.
Look at how those reviews demonstrate how CLEARLY HE FITS the Fantastic Four directorial mantle. Look at how those prove that he will easily be capable of handling the extremely deep emotionally complex and layered story of the Silver Surfer alongside Galactus... look at it... "the laugh meter running..." "corny, but it grows on you..." This is exactly the kind of positive vibe that will kindle the genius fire of Silver Surfer being brought to screen... he will share a buddy-buddy bad cop good cop type relationship with Galactus... it will be brilliant, just wait for it.
Its funny how you forget Barbershop....a movie he directed, helped to write, etc. It was highly rated by moviegoers as well as critics.
"It excels because, unlike so many other Hollywood movies of its ilk, it offers hope."
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1115979/reviews.php?critic=columns&sortby=default&page=1&rid=782907)
-- Derek Tse (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/author-4404/), JAM! MOVIES (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-234/)
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-1226/)
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-499/)
[/URL][LEFT] "...a charmer of a comedy, rich in the traditions of American camaraderie."
-- John J. Puccio (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-28/), DVDTOWN.COM (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-745/)
"A genuinely funny ensemble comedy that also asks its audience -- in a heartwarming, nonjudgmental kind of way -- to consider what we value in our daily lives."
-- [URL="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/author-4514/"]Sean Piccoli (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1115979/reviews.php?critic=columns&sortby=default&page=4&rid=782920), SOUTH FLORIDA SUN-SENTINEL (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-506/)
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-1024/)
"Like a veteran head cutter, Barbershop is tuned in to its community."
-- Sean O'Connell (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/author-1255/), ECLIPSE MAGAZINE (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-862/)
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1115979/reviews.php?critic=columns&sortby=default&page=1&rid=778088) "As warm as it is wise, deftly setting off uproarious humor with an underlying seriousness that sneaks up on the viewer, providing an experience that is richer than anticipated."
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1115979/reviews.php?critic=columns&sortby=default&page=1&rid=782586)-- Kevin Thomas (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/author-739/), LOS ANGELES TIMES (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-268/)
(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-400/)
"Amid the new populist comedies that underscore the importance of family tradition and familial community, one would be hard-pressed to find a movie with a bigger, fatter heart than Barbershop."
-- Jan Stuart (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/author-1128/), NEWSDAY (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/source-338/)
What I take from this is....when he is in it from the very beginning, writing, directing, putting it all together....he delivers. My hope is that now he is in it from the beginning....and my hope is he can deliver.
Kelly
07-06-2006, 08:09 PM
Namor????? are we on him again...
As far as Red's thoughts on the love triangle.....I don't think its going to be a love triangle at all.....why do people from the movie keep calling it that.....there wasn't a love triangle in the first movie....and I think the same thing is going to happen.
I think Sue is totally in love with Reed and we will see that, but she feels compassion (not love) compassion for this man from another world who needs (in her opinion) help. He sees in her something he hasn't felt from someone before and he is drawn to that......THATS my opinion on that subject.
terry78
07-06-2006, 08:14 PM
^People like to gripe about Story being chosen because Fox wanted to cash in on the cheap, and while some of that may be true, Barbershop showed that he can do dysfunctional characters that ultimately are there for each other.
GL's Light
07-06-2006, 08:16 PM
You got your edit in before I could crack a joke about Sue being narcissistic, JMAfan. ;)
Kelly
07-06-2006, 08:19 PM
^People like to gripe about Story being chosen because Fox wanted to cash in on the cheap, and while some of that may be true, Barbershop showed that he can do dysfunctional characters that ultimately are there for each other.
And they have every right to gripe about that....I'm not going to sit here and say all is well in the halls of Fox as far as this sequel is concerned. I want changes, and I hope they are there....
But I REFUSE to write this movie off, and sit here and throw around "it sucks"...."it gonna bomb"....etc...etc....I heard the same about the first, and even with all of my dislikes of the first, MANY, MANY people enjoyed the hell out of it, and for that I'm happy. I have hope for the sequel, and that hope is more than some peoples simple desire to come here and crap all over something they haven't seen yet. BUT we will have many....I could probably name them.....but I will refrain.:o
Kelly
07-06-2006, 08:20 PM
You got your edit in before I could crack a joke about Sue being narcissistic, JMAfan. ;)
I have super speedy fingers....:)
weezerspider
07-06-2006, 08:21 PM
I don't really mind. sounds kinda cool
antariksh
07-06-2006, 10:10 PM
And they have every right to gripe about that....I'm not going to sit here and say all is well in the halls of Fox as far as this sequel is concerned. I want changes, and I hope they are there....
But I REFUSE to write this movie off, and sit here and throw around "it sucks"...."it gonna bomb"....etc...etc....I heard the same about the first, and even with all of my dislikes of the first, MANY, MANY people enjoyed the hell out of it, and for that I'm happy. I have hope for the sequel, and that hope is more than some peoples simple desire to come here and crap all over something they haven't seen yet. BUT we will have many....I could probably name them.....but I will refrain.:o
HEY i love FANTASTIC FOUR :up:
Kelly
07-06-2006, 10:11 PM
HEY i love FANTASTIC FOUR :up:
ok...
Advanced Dark
07-06-2006, 11:08 PM
Best idea...period. Hulk worked...thing sounded great but clearly a guy in a suit. A cosmic herald to galactus...CGI or bust. Period.
Iceburgeruk
07-08-2006, 10:45 AM
But it's sad to have to resort to a (silver) strap-on. :(
There's the source of the Surfer-Reed conflict - a guy with no penis meets a guy who can shape his penis into any size he wants. That's a recipe for jealous aggression if I've ever seen one.
Unless the "any size guy" has endurance problems in that field and the no penis guy doesn`t need one coz he can focus cosmic energy into the...ahem...specific region and you know... give the woman in question a...ahem....quick burst of universal force...from across the other side of the room. Then things would be the other way round wouldn`t they.
lol
Silver Surfer: Sorry reed sue`s leaving with me looks like i just have...magic fingers.
gvcool2
07-09-2006, 10:32 PM
Ign have just reported that actor James Lee who is appearing in Snakes On A Plane has been rumoured to of screentested for the role. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1470550/
Also if there has'n't already been a thread dedicated to the casting of the surfer than lets make this one the official thread.
antariksh
07-09-2006, 10:38 PM
hmmm I have no clue who this actor is
OH so that they are planning to use CGI on him??
I don't know we will come to know whether this is true at comic con.
gvcool2
07-09-2006, 10:40 PM
hmmm I have no clue who this actor is
OH so that they are planning to use CGI on him??
I don't know we will come to know whether this is true at comic con.
ye they will probably do a technique similar to andy serkis/king kong,
apparntly they have been doing screen tests for a short while so maybe we will have a definete casting announcement at comic con
antariksh
07-09-2006, 10:42 PM
ye they will probably do a technique similar to andy serkis/king kong,
apparntly they have been doing screen tests for a short while so maybe we will have a definete casting announcement at comic con
which is good.
but u know what we have to see if this person is good enough for the role and will he do justice to SF.
I have to watch Snakes on a plane now!!!
gvcool2
07-09-2006, 10:44 PM
which is good.
but u know what we have to see if this person is good enough for the role and will he do justice to SF.
I have to watch Snakes on a plane now!!!
I wana see SOAP For The Mother ****ing Snakes
antariksh
07-09-2006, 10:52 PM
http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/717/717254p1.html
sad part is that he is a TV ACTOR!!!!! and has a very short role in snakes on a plane!!!
F4 movie is full of TV actors lol
Except jessica alba an i think chris evans
gvcool2
07-09-2006, 11:05 PM
http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/717/717254p1.html
sad part is that he is a TV ACTOR!!!!! and has a very short role in snakes on a plane!!!
F4 movie is full of TV actors lol
Except jessica alba an i think chris evans
everyone has to start somewhere, and being a tv actor doesnt necesarily mean a bad actor, Julian Mcmahon happens to be an incredible actor (regardless of his performance in F4) so who knows, this guy called upstage all the Snakes On The Mother****ing Plane
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.