PDA

View Full Version : supreme power questions for all


JesusOfNazarath
04-12-2006, 08:08 PM
anybody like this? i love it. its like ultimate dc. it sucks that for dc that marvel can write their characters more interesting then they can. last year dc was real good i'm not gonna lie, but looks like they're bringing back in the lame factor.


so my questions are:

1) do you like supreme power?

2) do you think its well writen?

gildea
04-12-2006, 08:10 PM
though i disagree with your assertions regarding DC i answer yes to 1 & 2.

JesusOfNazarath
04-12-2006, 08:13 PM
which ones? all? you don't think its like ult dc?

gildea
04-12-2006, 08:17 PM
not really no. I think its taking the DC archatypes in power and origin but altering their personalities and putting them in a more realistic setting.

As such i don't think it's ultimate DC.

And i don't think marvel writes dc characters better than them as a result.

Supereme power though it stems from DC is it's own thing. (one could argue like watchmen stems from the old charlton characters).

JesusOfNazarath
04-12-2006, 08:19 PM
not really no. I think its taking the DC archatypes in power and origin but altering their personalities and putting them in a more realistic setting.


thats what the ultimate line does though for most parts.

Roughneck
04-12-2006, 08:21 PM
I like it.

But the only reason you think that "Marvel writes DC Characters better then DC" is because they can start fron scratch and completely change whatever they want to about the character. I don't think we should start a petition to get JMS onto JLA.

Maybe a peteition to get Supreme Power back into MAX.

JesusOfNazarath
04-12-2006, 08:24 PM
Maybe a peteition to get Supreme Power back into MAX.


yes. i miss the f bombs and nudity.:(

gildea
04-12-2006, 08:25 PM
thats what the ultimate line does though for most parts.


Ahhh but the ultimate line keeps the personalities more or less the same.

Ultimate superman should NEVER plan to take over as hyperion is.

TheFalcon
04-12-2006, 08:31 PM
I like Supreme Power and I think it's well written.

The only thing I don't like about SP is that it should be published by DC since the characters are "alternate versions" of their JLA members. Not sure if I would call it a Ultimate DCU, though.

As for the Marvel writing the character's better I would much rather read the current DCU instead of SP if I had to choose just one.
I like the DCU as it is now.

ang_hulk
04-12-2006, 09:49 PM
one of the best comics ever and i think not only comic fans but everyone should read it.its wonderfull.After the last issue of night hawk ive decided id sell my own blood to read this comic every month.

XwolverineX
04-13-2006, 06:47 AM
Never read it, might hafta check it out sometime down th' road.

UK_Stu
04-13-2006, 07:32 AM
not really no. I think its taking the DC archatypes in power and origin but altering their personalities and putting them in a more realistic setting.

As such i don't think it's ultimate DC.

And i don't think marvel writes dc characters better than them as a result.

Supereme power though it stems from DC is it's own thing. (one could argue like watchmen stems from the old charlton characters).

I like supreme power, and I agree with Gildea. Though the supreme character's origins and powers are similar to the DC characters thats were the similarity ends - Hyperion acts nothing like Superman, though they essentially have the same powers. Ultimate versions of characters are still similar to their 616 counterparts.

I would imagine DC could write the same characters in an equally good way to Marvel.

My concern with Supreme power though is if its no longer a Max title, will the stories be affected ?

Whirlysplat
04-13-2006, 08:30 AM
Squadron Supreme 1 in the Marvel Knights format is now out. I read it yeaterday. It has Gary Franks art so it is better than the Hyperion mini.
It seems to have lost little so far and was an excellent first issue more like Supreme Power than any of the Spin Offs. I recently reread my old issue of Gruenwalds Squadron Supreme from the eighties they are still excellent if you haven't read them find the trade and treat yourself. JMS I think will do an excellent job he likes timed arcs (Babylon 5's % years as an example). Read issue 1 and you will see that it's 2 years to Hyperion becoming Hyperion from the mini - The events have that long to unfold. JMS loves this sort of time regression he did it will Galen in B5.

- Whirly

JesusOfNazarath
04-13-2006, 11:20 AM
JMS I think will do an excellent job he likes timed arcs (Babylon 5's % years as an example). Read issue 1 and you will see that it's 2 years to Hyperion becoming Hyperion from the mini


so whata ya mean the squadron supreme series happens before the
hyperion mini happend? i haven't read that mini yet or that first issue.

Furthermore
04-13-2006, 11:30 AM
I really enjoy SP. The writing is tight and relevant and the art is good stuff too. Plus, you get superman except he doesn't hypnotise everyone he comes in contact with so they don't know who he is!

rigel7soldiers
04-13-2006, 03:45 PM
I love Supreme power. It's just so terrible that it's incredibe. Michael Redstone is a freak. Love the Amphibian.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 07:24 PM
I liked the first issue. I'm looking forward to more with Inertia. She's spunky. Tom Thumb was pretty funny, too. :)

I don't see a need to go back to the MAX label. They've adequately explained why there won't be nudity anymore in Doc Spectrum's "conversation" with Amphibian: the Squadron's a public team now, and you can't have government-endorsed heroes working in public with no clothes on. As for the cursing, I've always felt cursing's pretty overrated anyway. I don't really see a difference between printing the F-word and printing "%*#@." Every single one of us knows exactly what those symbols are standing in for and can replace them with the real word in our heads if we want. Meanwhile, more readers get to share in the greatness of JMS' Supremeverse.
so whata ya mean the squadron supreme series happens before the
hyperion mini happend? i haven't read that mini yet or that first issue.
No, the Hyperion mini-series happens before the first issue of Squadron Supreme. It directly precedes it, in fact.
Ahhh but the ultimate line keeps the personalities more or less the same.

Ultimate superman should NEVER plan to take over as hyperion is.
What Ultimate comics are you reading? I can think of several Ultimate characters who are vastly different from their 616 bases.

The Question
04-13-2006, 07:28 PM
What Ultimate comics are you reading? I can think of several Ultimate characters who are vastly different from their 616 bases.


I don't think many of the Ultimate characters are as different from their 616 bases as some of the Supreme characters are from their DC bases. I mean, most of the Ultimate characters at least keep some of the basic aspects of the character (Sinsister, of course, excluded, because Ultimate Sinister sucks ass). Some of the Supreme characters are a good deal different.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 07:35 PM
I wasn't comparing their degree of difference to Supreme Power's characters' degree of difference from their DC bases. The fact remains that quite a few Ultimate characters are wildly different from their 616 bases, though.

Also, Superman has already tried to take over the world a few times.

32CAGE
04-13-2006, 07:37 PM
I love supreme power. I don't think nudity and language in a Max line is what is necessary for it to maintain success. It is most interesting to see characters with DC type powers but engaging personalities that only marvel can bring.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 07:46 PM
Yeah, none of DC's characters have personalities at all. They're all like, "lolz, ur bad guys were gonna beat u" and then the fight's over. :up:

The Question
04-13-2006, 07:47 PM
I wasn't comparing their degree of difference to Supreme Power's characters' degree of difference from their DC bases. The fact remains that quite a few Ultimate characters are wildly different from their 616 bases, though.

Well, in some ways yes, and in some ways no. The largest examples are The Hulk and Thor. The Hulk having become a violant canable and Thor having become a political activist/environmentalist who hangs around hippy comunes. But if you think about it, Ultimate Hulk shares alot of traist with two of 616 Banner's less frequent and much nastyer personalities. Joe Fixit and Mindless Hulk. Ultimate Hulk's got Joe's cynical outlook, selfishness, and ego. He's also got Mindless Hulk's animalistic tendancies, severe anger issues that make Savage Hulk look tame, and tendancy to act out soley upon his basic instincts and needs (sex, food, and shelter), and kill anything that gets in the way of these things.

As for Thor, yes, his actions are quite different. And, at first glance, he seems quite different. But his aditude towards the government is about the same as 616, (who's often disagreed with the suits who look over The Avengers), his tendancy to speak his mind (which 616 Thor does alot, even when it does more harm than good), and 616 Thor's basic sense of honor. The only thing that he did that seems very different from 616 Thor was not helping with The Hulk until the president doubled the international aid budget. But really, that is a weird kind of honor right there. He knows the U.S. can help these people more, and he suddenly finds himself in a position wher he can get them to. They never really showed Thor when he said this, so for all we know he may have felt somewhat guilty over it and gace it a good deal of thought.

Now, obviously I'm not saying that they;re exactly the same. Just saying, Supreme Power, in some cases, is much more of a departure than the Ultimate line, and at least the Ultimate line keeps some of the basic aspects of the characters when they change them. Except for Ultimate Sinister, who sucks.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 07:54 PM
You're stretching the Thor comparison a lot. Holding out on fighting the Hulk, which could potentially cost dozens of human lives every second he delays, is something I feel comfortable saying 616 Thor would absolutely never do. Ultimate Thor is politicized to the extent of being unrecognizable to 616 Thor, as far as I've seen. They're both boastful. That's about all I can see in the way of similarities between them.

Ultimate Hulk wouldn't have been one of the characters I'd have said was hugely different from his 616 counterpart, since his 616 counterpart's had various versions over the years. I agree that Ultimate Hulk is most like Fixit and the original version of the Hulk, who was basically just an arrogant jerk and a bully.

The Question
04-13-2006, 07:59 PM
You're stretching the Thor comparison a lot.

Possibly.

Holding out on fighting the Hulk, which could potentially cost dozens of human lives every second he delays, is something I feel comfortable saying 616 Thor would absolutely never do.

True. Still, we never actually saw how Thor came to the descision. It may not have been as simple for him as "let the freak kill 'em, lol". But yeah, they are a good deal different in some aspects.

Ultimate Thor is politicized to the extent of being unrecognizable to 616 Thor, as far as I've seen. They're both boastful. That's about all I can see in the way of similarities between them.

You have a point. Still, I tend to see Ultimate Thor as "if Thor had done this just a bit differently, this is how he would have ended up". I can actually see Thor being quite political. It's just in 616, they never thought to explore that.

Ultimate Hulk wouldn't have been one of the characters I'd have said was hugely different from his 616 counterpart, since his 616 counterpart's had various versions over the years. I agree that Ultimate Hulk is most like Fixit and the original version of the Hulk, who was basically just an arrogant jerk and a bully.

Basically.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 08:06 PM
You have a point. Still, I tend to see Ultimate Thor as "if Thor had done this just a bit differently, this is how he would have ended up". I can actually see Thor being quite political. It's just in 616, they never thought to explore that.
They explored it in the King Thor saga. They just explored it in a way that made sense for the 616 Thor as he was portrayed in that context. He basically went around bettering the world in various ways that only a god with incredible resources could, then presented himself to the UN as basically nothing more than a courtesy. Later, he intervened in a country's corrupt government and, later still, he took over Earth completely for its own good. Granted, he lacked his human perspective at the time, but for the most part I've always found that 616 Thor tends to just ignore Earth's governments altogether and offer aid to people wherever they need it, whether the government likes it or not. He's beyond terrestrial governments because he believes his authority is greater than theirs, unlike Ultimate Thor, who pretty much spent all his time before joining the Ultimates appealing to the governments of Earth for change.

The Question
04-13-2006, 08:13 PM
They explored it in the King Thor saga. They just explored it in a way that made sense for the 616 Thor as he was portrayed in that context. He basically went around bettering the world in various ways that only a god with incredible resources could, then presented himself to the UN as basically nothing more than a courtesy. Later, he intervened in a country's corrupt government and, later still, he took over Earth completely for its own good. Granted, he lacked his human perspective at the time, but for the most part I've always found that 616 Thor tends to just ignore Earth's governments altogether and offer aid to people wherever they need it, whether the government likes it or not. He's beyond terrestrial governments because he believes his authority is greater than theirs, unlike Ultimate Thor, who pretty much spent all his time before joining the Ultimates appealing to the governments of Earth for change.



True. But King Thor was Thor after becoming the ruler of Asgard, thus having the entire Kingdom's resources at his disposal. He was capable of making the big direct changes he wanted. Ultimate Thor is not. He's a very powerful superhuman, but he still can;t force major change the way Thor could in the King Thor storyline.

Whirlysplat
04-13-2006, 08:29 PM
so whata ya mean the squadron supreme series happens before the
hyperion mini happend? i haven't read that mini yet or that first issue.

Not exactly when you read issue 5 of the mini you will get what I mean.

Anyone else notice that JMS paid homage to Gruenwalds DB7 and initial Squadron work with the inclusion of Blur instead of Whizzer and the change of Emil from Menace to the brains of the Squadron. Lots of cool "in" retro stuff going on.

- Whirly

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 09:36 PM
Blur is the Whizzer of JMS' Squadron. :confused:
True. But King Thor was Thor after becoming the ruler of Asgard, thus having the entire Kingdom's resources at his disposal. He was capable of making the big direct changes he wanted. Ultimate Thor is not. He's a very powerful superhuman, but he still can;t force major change the way Thor could in the King Thor storyline.
Thor could force change without Asgard's resources. He can control every aspect of the weather in every way. If he wanted to, he could literally transform the entire world. He just never had the desire to before the King Thor saga because he had the perspective to understand that it wasn't the right thing to do.

The Question
04-13-2006, 09:39 PM
Are you sure he's got that kind of range? I mean, I know he can make some pretty ****ing huge storms, but literally change the world? Besides, in the Ultimates, he was shown using his powers a bit forcefully. Not as much as you described, but at one point during a protest in Italy, the cops showed up, and Thor literally swated all of them away with one strike from his hammer. I'm fairly certain that there was a good deal more violence involved there that we didn't see, because the team plus Captain Britain and some other Europian supers all atacked him for it.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 09:46 PM
I can't recall his ever manipulating weather all around the world at once, but then, he's never had a reason to. I do know that his power has trumped pretty much every other weather manipulator's power, though. Captain America called him in specifically to counter this one Native American dude's weather powers, and he did it with ease, even though the Native American guy was backed by his own weather god.

What does the Ultimate Italy incident have to do with anything? 616 Thor's capable of doing that and more in his sleep.

The Question
04-13-2006, 09:51 PM
I can't recall his ever manipulating weather all around the world at once, but then, he's never had a reason to. I do know that his power has trumped pretty much every other weather manipulator's power, though. Captain America called him in specifically to counter this one Native American dude's weather powers, and he did it with ease, even though the Native American guy was backed by his own weather god.

I get that he's one ****ing powerful storm god. But I wouldn't assuem that he could control all the weather around the world at once just because he hasn't yet.

What does the Ultimate Italy incident have to do with anything? 616 Thor's capable of doing that and more in his sleep.

It has to do with what you're talking about. You're saying if Thor got more political, he'd probably be alot less peacefull. I was giving an example of Ultimate Thor using a fair amout of violence to get his point across.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 10:02 PM
Thor didn't use violence to better the world as King Thor initially. He brought medical supplies and food down from Asgard, empowered reactors with the Odinpower to provide cheap energy, that sort of thing. The UN launched nuclear missiles at Asgard after it appeared above Manhattan and Thor still didn't attack anyone. He just teleported the missiles' explosions away and gave the UN a harsh talking to. It wasn't until this bunch of business moguls tried to kill Thor and destroy Asgard that Thor started his violent coup of the world.

What I was saying was that if 616 Thor wanted to effect change, he'd just do it without appealing to paltry Earth governments the way Ultimate Thor does. Governments have laws appointed by man. Thor's will is the will of a god. In his mind he outranks the governments, he just obeys Odin's pact of noninterference established a millennium ago. Over the years he's developed some respect for the spirit of government, but he still has a great deal of disdain for the corruption and pettiness that beset most human governments.

The Question
04-13-2006, 10:06 PM
Thor didn't use violence to better the world as King Thor initially. He brought medical supplies and food down from Asgard, empowered reactors with the Odinpower to provide cheap energy, that sort of thing. The UN launched nuclear missiles at Asgard after it appeared above Manhattan and Thor still didn't attack anyone. He just teleported the missiles' explosions away and gave the UN a harsh talking to. It wasn't until this bunch of business moguls tried to kill Thor and destroy Asgard that Thor started his violent coup of the world.

True. I'm just saying, Ultimate Thor isn't all talk. He's used force when necesairy.

What I was saying was that if 616 Thor wanted to effect change, he'd just do it without appealing to paltry Earth governments the way Ultimate Thor does. Governments have laws appointed by man. Thor's will is the will of a god. In his mind he outranks the governments, he just obeys Odin's pact of noninterference established a millennium ago. Over the years he's developed some respect for the spirit of government, but he still has a great deal of disdain for the corruption and pettiness that beset most human governments.

But the question is: How far would he get? He can kick up a mean storm, I get that. And, he could probably take out a good deal of military forces that would come after him while he was trying to force these changes. But, eventually, he'd be taken down. Why? Because A: he's not the only superhuman on Earth, B: it would be him against every military force on the planet, and C: I doubt he can stop a nuke without the odin force. I don't think Ultimate Thor is wussing out in front of the world's governments. I think he's just playing it smart. Because, if he tried to inact change on his own by force, he'd probably fail.

THANOSRULES
04-13-2006, 10:07 PM
JMS Squadron is pretty Much ultimate Squadron Supreme..I think thats the best and most accurate way to describe it.

As for the series I read the 3 Supreme power trades the other day...

Great writing,dialogue etc.. a very functional adult/mature comic..yet it suffers from many of the problems at large in Marvel comics today.

The comic is long winded and there is not much action. I mean 18 issues and they hardley were a team or had introduced all the members yet.

I also feel like the comic is an amalgam of things done before. Not just in the respect that Squadron is perceived as a JLA knock, but the Supreme power itself seems to be nothing really new in terms of its feel. It has elements of rising stars, and some other alternate timelines stories IMO.

Just not great.

Ultimatly i found myself wondering what was up with the 'ole squadron of Gruenwald..good thing they returned with force in Exiles.

Frankley i am sick of marvel expanding Ultimates and re-launches simply to accomidate "rock star" pampered writers.

When we last left the original squadron they had alot of work to do and an excellent set-up for an ongoing series...

i would have liked to seen that story instead.

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 10:10 PM
But the question is: How far would he get? He can kick up a mean storm, I get that. And, he could probably take out a good deal of military forces that would come after him while he was trying to force these changes. But, eventually, he'd be taken down. Why? Because A: he's not the only superhuman on Earth, B: it would be him against every military force on the planet, and C: I doubt he can stop a nuke without the odin force. I don't think Ultimate Thor is wussing out in front of the world's governments. I think he's just playing it smart. Because, if he tried to inact change on his own by force, he'd probably fail.
I don't know how far he'd get, but it'd be a lot further than Ultimate Thor could get if he tried the same route. From what I've seen, Ultimate Thor's power pales in comparison to 616 Thor's. There's no military force on Earth that could stand up to him, and whether nukes would be a problem for him without the Odinpower is debatable. I doubt they would be until they start getting into the armageddon-level payloads, and even those he could just teleport away or redirect with the wind.

Either way, he'd probably never bother. Political issues aren't a major concern for 616 Thor. He doesn't have an agenda beyond helping people by kicking villains' asses and maybe bagging Sif if he's got some time left over.

The Question
04-13-2006, 10:19 PM
I don't know how far he'd get, but it'd be a lot further than Ultimate Thor could get if he tried the same route. From what I've seen, Ultimate Thor's power pales in comparison to 616 Thor's. There's no military force on Earth that could stand up to him, and whether nukes would be a problem for him without the Odinpower is debatable. I doubt they would be until they start getting into the armageddon-level payloads, and even those he could just teleport away or redirect with the wind.

You're right, Ultimate Thor has yet to display feats on 616 Thor's levels (except for teleporting a planet destroying warhead into another dimension. That was kind of cool). And if he is considerably weaker than 616 Thor, that may be a factor. But I highly doubt no military force on the planet would stand a chance against Thor. That includes the super soldiers. What do you think would happen to Thor is the rest of The Avengers, the Winder Gaurd, and Alpha Flight all atacked him at once?

TheCorpulent1
04-13-2006, 11:54 PM
I don't consider other superheroes military forces. I was talking about the armies, navies, and air forces of nations. Of course, if you throw enough superhumans at Thor he'll get his ass kicked. Hell, if you throw one or two of the right superhumans at Thor he'll get his ass kicked. Draft the Juggernaut and the Hulk to fight him and they'd be picking pieces of Thor up for weeks.

JesusOfNazarath
04-14-2006, 12:27 AM
Well, in some ways yes, and in some ways no. The largest examples are The Hulk and Thor.


i think colossus, cap, fury, the symbiotes, jean grey, deadpool and the goblins are big examples.

Whirlysplat
04-14-2006, 08:49 AM
I don't consider other superheroes military forces. I was talking about the armies, navies, and air forces of nations. Of course, if you throw enough superhumans at Thor he'll get his ass kicked. Hell, if you throw one or two of the right superhumans at Thor he'll get his ass kicked. Draft the Juggernaut and the Hulk to fight him and they'd be picking pieces of Thor up for weeks.

He can use Battlefield removal on both of these and even though an ill and weakened Thor had problems using the Godforce against Juggy in the Simonson run, I don't think a fit Thor would.

Remember that Warrior Madness Thor caused huge problems for the Infinity Watch (withstanding karmic blasts and the soul gem), Surfer and Strange.

Thor when written to full potential is a beast, however his warrior code normally means he fights like for like and in this way I agree Juggy and the Hulk would hurt him badly.

- Whirly

The Question
04-14-2006, 09:23 AM
I don't consider other superheroes military forces. I was talking about the armies, navies, and air forces of nations. Of course, if you throw enough superhumans at Thor he'll get his ass kicked. Hell, if you throw one or two of the right superhumans at Thor he'll get his ass kicked. Draft the Juggernaut and the Hulk to fight him and they'd be picking pieces of Thor up for weeks.


Well, I'm assuming that, if dealing with Thor, the military would simply call in superhumans to deal with him.

ang_hulk
04-14-2006, 09:59 AM
If anyone likes dc characters but has issues with how they do things they should read supreme power,i slso highly recommend snaging the trades when of all the minis especilly night hawks.this book is awesome

TheCorpulent1
04-14-2006, 11:30 AM
He can use Battlefield removal on both of these and even though an ill and weakened Thor had problems using the Godforce against Juggy in the Simonson run, I don't think a fit Thor would.

Remember that Warrior Madness Thor caused huge problems for the Infinity Watch (withstanding karmic blasts and the soul gem), Surfer and Strange.

Thor when written to full potential is a beast, however his warrior code normally means he fights like for like and in this way I agree Juggy and the Hulk would hurt him badly.

- Whirly
There's the problem. Thor's very rarely been written to full potential in the comics. If he were thinking in most of his Juggernaut fights, he'd have beaten him by absorbing the magic energy that grants Jugs his total invulnerability. That would leave Jugs as just another bruiser, and his fighting skills don't even come close to Thor's.

One could argue that Warrior Madness Thor was augmented considerably by his rage. WM is supposed to boost Thor's strength a lot, though it's been portrayed pretty sketchily in the past. He kicked a lot of cosmic powerhouses' asses in "Blood and Thunder," but he still couldn't beat the Hulk just before Onslaught while he was in the throes of WM.

As for battlefield removal, as you pointed out, Thor's warrior code prevents him from using that as anything but a last resort. Granted, his priorities may shift and he may use it earlier if he's trying to change the world, but it's still pretty unlikely that Thor would just toss people into another dimension for expediency.
Well, I'm assuming that, if dealing with Thor, the military would simply call in superhumans to deal with him.
That may be, but I still wouldn't consider those superhumans part of the country's military forces. The US government, for example, would have to ask the Avengers or the FF or most other groups of superhumans to assist them in neutralizing Thor. There are only a few superhumans who are actually government officers, able to be deployed as the government sees fit. Sabra, Alpha Flight, and (I think) Big Hero 6 are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.

The Question
04-14-2006, 02:21 PM
And you don't think if those guys came together, they couldn't handle Thor? Alpha Flight is quite powerful.




Anyway, that asside, I have a question:

What are the other Ultimate characters that you think are major departures?

TheCorpulent1
04-14-2006, 02:59 PM
There's Ultimate Cap, who represents basically the opposite parts of America from 616 Cap down to his very core.

Ultimate Nightcrawler started out by murdering a bunch of soldiers with a machine gun. I think you'd be hard-pressed to get 616 Nightcrawler to even fire a gun, let alone kill half a dozen people with one.

Ultimate Gwen Stacy was entirely different from the wholesome, girl-next-door 616 Gwen.

Ultimate MJ was basically 616 Gwen, which makes her different from 616 MJ.

Ultimate Storm is pretty different from 616 Storm in that she lacked the regal, born leader qualities early on. I quit reading Ultimate X-Men relatively early, though, so I don't know if she's gotten closer to 616 Storm.

Ultimate Vision seems to be an entirely different take on the character altogether, with the only common thread being that they're both machines.

Honestly, I haven't read anything Ultimate in so long that I can't really say whether these differences are still valid. At the time I was reading Ultimate comics, though, I noticed a lot of differences between the characters.

The Question
04-14-2006, 03:49 PM
There's Ultimate Cap, who represents basically the opposite parts of America from 616 Cap down to his very core.

Well, yes an no. He's very much like Cap was when he first started out. Quick, to the point, and prone to a good deal of violence. The main reason for this? He was in a war. Not a time for subtlety or questioning orders. Especially since he agreed with most of his orders. Now, when Cap awoke from the ice in 616, he adapted to the modern world rather quickly. I mean, he still felt like a fish out of water, but for the sakes of his job, he realized that the world was different, and the same tactics and mentality no longer aplied. Ultimate Cap is still adjusting. He's an unerringly patriotic new deal democrat in a time where things are alot less black and white. In WWII, it was pretty damn obvious that Hitler was the bad guy. Now, while there are still bad guys, alot of the stuff the U.S. is doing isn't that great either. There's no evil empire to fight againts. But Cap's still in his wartime mentality. As the series has progressed, he's become a bit more like 616 Cap. Especially in the issue where he was framed for Hawkeye's murder. The scene where he and Bucky were walking through the cemetary and talking was very much akin to 616 Cap.

Ultimate Nightcrawler started out by murdering a bunch of soldiers with a machine gun. I think you'd be hard-pressed to get 616 Nightcrawler to even fire a gun, let alone kill half a dozen people with one.

Very true. But then, you have to think of the situation he was in. He had been kidnapped by Weapon X and tortured for months, and he was trying to escape. He was panicking, and basically in a fight or flight state of mind. Not really thinking. Notice how he's never even hurt anyone that badly since.

Ultimate Gwen Stacy was entirely different from the wholesome, girl-next-door 616 Gwen.

Ultimate MJ was basically 616 Gwen, which makes her different from 616 MJ.

Okay, now there I have to agree. They kind of swaped personalities.

Ultimate Storm is pretty different from 616 Storm in that she lacked the regal, born leader qualities early on. I quit reading Ultimate X-Men relatively early, though, so I don't know if she's gotten closer to 616 Storm.

She's become a good deal more responsible and mature, and has taken on alot of the leader like qualities that 616 Storm has. She's not particularly regal, but she seems alot more responsible than before.

Ultimate Vision seems to be an entirely different take on the character altogether, with the only common thread being that they're both machines.

Honestly, I haven't read anything Ultimate in so long that I can't really say whether these differences are still valid. At the time I was reading Ultimate comics, though, I noticed a lot of differences between the characters.

There are differences. But the more I've read, the more I see that the differences are alot more superficial than I origionally thought.

Zoken
04-15-2006, 11:17 PM
I picked up the first issue of Squadron Supreme, and I have to say I rather like it. I like the new take on Super-heroing. I've never read any Supreme related stuff before, so I'll probably be trying to go back and find some of this max line and check it out.

By the way; DC has as much as said Marvel could write their stuff better. to back this up I cite the "Just Imagine..." line wherein Marvel's human mascot Stan Lee recreated most of DC's major sellers (Actual names in tact). I'd like to know whats going on with them lately.

anyway, I think the problem is that people still see the new Squadron Supreme characters as based on DC characters. they aren't. they're based on Marvel's Squadron Supreme (which admittedly were based on DC's big sellers, but over time Marvel made the characters their own).

co2
04-15-2006, 11:28 PM
I have the vol 1 hardcover. Thought it was OK. Not enough to get me to buy any more though.

spiderwasp
04-22-2006, 11:23 PM
I've really been enjoying the Supreme Power series, but would argue that it isn't an Ultimate version of the DC books as much as it is the Ultimate version of the mainstream Marvel Squadrine Supreme, which was of course, in turn created based on DC. Minor difference, I know, but still this second degree of seperation helps the book stand further apart from DC. Besides, the original Squadrine was awesome - especially the Utopia limited series. I hope Marvel won't forget about them.
Did anyone else love the line in the Avengers/JLA crossover where one of the Avengers called the JLA a bunch of Squadrine Supreme wantabees? Very funny.

TheCorpulent1
04-22-2006, 11:36 PM
Marvel hasn't forgotten about the original Squadron at all. Check out Exiles. They're all over that comic.

GoldenAgeHero
04-22-2006, 11:51 PM
I like it.

But the only reason you think that "Marvel writes DC Characters better then DC" is because they can start fron scratch and completely change whatever they want to about the character. I don't think we should start a petition to get JMS onto JLA.

Maybe a peteition to get Supreme Power back into MAX.

jms will probably make batman be his destiny and give him a bat avatar and some fangs, with some stingers:rolleyes:

GoldenAgeHero
04-22-2006, 11:54 PM
I picked up the first issue of Squadron Supreme, and I have to say I rather like it. I like the new take on Super-heroing. I've never read any Supreme related stuff before, so I'll probably be trying to go back and find some of this max line and check it out.

By the way; DC has as much as said Marvel could write their stuff better. to back this up I cite the "Just Imagine..." line wherein Marvel's human mascot Stan Lee recreated most of DC's major sellers (Actual names in tact). I'd like to know whats going on with them lately.

anyway, I think the problem is that people still see the new Squadron Supreme characters as based on DC characters. they aren't. they're based on Marvel's Squadron Supreme (which admittedly were based on DC's big sellers, but over time Marvel made the characters their own).

that line kinda sucked ass. i would really like to see where dc sid marvel can write thier stuff better when marvel can barely put out quality stories on its major titles.

Bullsear
04-23-2006, 01:47 AM
The pacing for Supreme Power is so much better than Squadron Supreme it's ridiculous. I'll give this title some time, cause I trust the writers, but I don't know if I can wait for two arcs.