View Full Version : Batsuit Discussion Thread
CaptainClown
08-30-2007, 12:10 AM
the bat can opener.. I dunno it looks weird though.
Cowleen
08-30-2007, 12:12 AM
Can anyone answer this? ^I have the pics from the leak. The new suit is featured, and yes the blades still run down his forearm.
Conebone69
08-30-2007, 12:13 AM
I have the pics from the leak. The new suit is featured, and yes the blades still run down his forearm.
No not the blades on his forearm. There like on his wrists and it goes all the way down to his elbow
Cowleen
08-30-2007, 12:22 AM
No not the blades on his forearm. There like on his wrists and it goes all the way down to his elbowThen as far as I can see, no. Want the pics tho? I'll see if i can figure out to send them to ya.
Conebone69
08-30-2007, 12:22 AM
Then as far as I can see, no. Want the pics tho? I'll see if i can figure out to send them to ya.
No its cool, I already got em
majemma
08-30-2007, 11:35 AM
it looks really cool i want to see it in action though to see how it moves and stuff
DeaDheaD
08-30-2007, 11:38 AM
The perfect bat suit:
http://i16.tinypic.com/4kkptao.jpg
I'm not gonna make fun of this b/c he looks like he has something wrong with him mentally, but his parents should be kicked in the stomach by a bus.
Mercurius
08-30-2007, 11:58 AM
no one in the right mind expects batman to do the stuff he does in a plain rubber suit. he has to have protection and padding to make it seem real. if you were jumping around doing s*** he did, would you have protection?
That's the whole problem: NOBODY would do it even in his full-armour. The whole "realism" debate is really a joke. :joker: Oops.
Die Hard is believable? Of course it is, once you stepped into the theatre and the lights are out, but it is a COMPLETE absurd in physical terms.
If you are thinking about "protection", Batman wouldn't be able to survive BB. Even with all the stuff on him. If they tried to fool me like that, they couldn't. I accepted he was able to survive BECAUSE HE IS THE BATMAN. Period.
We miss the point when we start agreeing under which conventions of the so-called "realism" we are able to accept an absurd. Giant robots-like that transform into cars? a guy who has claws coming out of his arms? a giant ape? a hell-spawned red freak with a big brick hand Etc?
Come on guys, let's get real. Oops, again. :woot:
JBElliott
08-30-2007, 05:24 PM
I'm not gonna make fun of this b/c he looks like he has something wrong with him mentally, but his parents should be kicked in the stomach by a bus.
Either that or you could figure out that it's an ad for Viagra and supposed to be funny. But your way is good too.
slave2catwoman
08-30-2007, 05:45 PM
I have a great idea. Let's take a comic book character that people have loved for decades and make a movie about it. But since we're so smart, let's make a bunch of improvements to the appearance of the main character. After all, the stuff that we love in the books would never work in a movie unless we tinker with it.
cryptic name
08-30-2007, 06:00 PM
I have a great idea. Let's take a comic book character that people have loved for decades and make a movie about it. But since we're so smart, let's make a bunch of improvements to the appearance of the main character. After all, the stuff that we love in the books would never work in a movie unless we tinker with it.
you're acting like this is the first batman movie ever made :whatever:
and yes, tinkering is necessary because this
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l165/cryptic_name/013.jpg
just wouldn't fly
slave2catwoman
08-30-2007, 07:19 PM
That is an overly cartoonish drawing done that way for a certain effect. Comic version Batman would work just fine, the same way Spider-Man does.
Minus the shiny finish, this suit would work great on film.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/SDCCBatman04.jpg
TheBatman072
08-30-2007, 07:39 PM
That is an overly cartoonish drawing done that way for a certain effect. Comic version Batman would work just fine, the same way Spider-Man does.
Minus the shiny finish, this suit would work great on film.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/SDCCBatman04.jpg
No, it really wouldn't.
And there's a reason why Superman and Spider-Man could wear tights. They're both invulnerable and Super-Human(Spider-Man to a lesser extent of course).
Batman is not. He is human and needs armor to protect him from the bad men with the knives and guns and bullets and bad stuff.
And DON'T give me that crap about "armor underneath tights." It's stupid and would look bad. Imagine wearing that suit up there. Then imagine putting on a bullet proof vest under it.
cryptic name
08-30-2007, 08:24 PM
That is an overly cartoonish drawing done that way for a certain effect. Comic version Batman would work just fine, the same way Spider-Man does.
Minus the shiny finish, this suit would work great on film.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/SDCCBatman04.jpg
we've never seen comic spidey on film. and that's a cool batman fanmade suit, but it would be ridiculous on screen.
CaptainClown
08-30-2007, 08:27 PM
Ya awesome fan made suit still looks ridiculous especially if a guy like that wanted to kick my ass.
I love how the cape and cowl are one piece.
slave2catwoman
08-30-2007, 08:36 PM
It would look ridiculous until he did it. The rubber muscle suits look really silly. Stiff, cumbersome.
CaptainClown
08-30-2007, 08:38 PM
I think the rubber muscle suit looks stupid too. But I mean I would be on the floor laughing, and if he is indeed batman he doesnt strike fear in his prey. I would tell the guy (laughing)" wow you made my night, Imma go home now "
slave2catwoman
08-30-2007, 08:41 PM
Would your reaction be the same when you saw Superman or Spider-Man? You might think it was silly until they acted. And really, do you think Bale's suit looked more scary than just odd?
Mr. Socko
08-30-2007, 08:41 PM
The kid in that pic looks like he's high on acid. Lol...
hame4479
08-30-2007, 08:51 PM
we've never seen comic spidey on film. and that's a cool batman fanmade suit, but it would be ridiculous on screen.
You don't consider Raimi's spidey outfits as spidey comic get up, cuz those are easily the most faithful and downright authentic costumes of any comic movie, aside from the raised webbing which was a good idea by the way.
raybia
08-30-2007, 08:56 PM
I love how the cape and cowl are one piece.
I agree. This is my biggest complaint about all of the movie batsuits.
cryptic name
08-30-2007, 09:37 PM
You don't consider Raimi's spidey outfits as spidey comic get up, cuz those are easily the most faithful and downright authentic costumes of any comic movie, aside from the raised webbing which was a good idea by the way.
actually i'd give that honor to the new Iron Man suit. and Spidey's movie duds were very close, but they don't look like they were made by a poor kid from queens, which is my biggest complaint.
Matrixo
08-30-2007, 09:41 PM
actually i'd give that honor to the new Iron Man suit. and Spidey's movie duds were very close, but they don't look like they were made by a poor kid from queens, which is my biggest complaint.
Yeah your right, I mean that suit looks too good to be made by some poor kid.:csad:
Ryudoz
08-30-2007, 09:58 PM
actually i'd give that honor to the new Iron Man suit. and Spidey's movie duds were very close, but they don't look like they were made by a poor kid from queens, which is my biggest complaint.
Not even with the $100 he made from pinning Bonesaw? Or even after every iteration of his suit is torn to ribbons it's in mint condition when he can't even pay his rent? No way. I refuse to believe it.
However, I must agree, Iron Man looks exactly how he should. They couldn't have gotten it better.
gwynplaine
08-30-2007, 10:19 PM
Since the Joker apparently uses disguises, which totally rocks, maybe Batman should do the same like in the comics.
jimmy
08-30-2007, 10:23 PM
That is an overly cartoonish drawing done that way for a certain effect. Comic version Batman would work just fine, the same way Spider-Man does.
Minus the shiny finish, this suit would work great on film.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/SDCCBatman04.jpg
This picture is so gay. Seriously: that guy dressed as batman just raped him from behind; that's why the little kid has his eyes rolled back.
Mr. Socko
08-30-2007, 10:27 PM
Is it just me or does that look like George Clooney in that picture?
jimmy
08-30-2007, 10:28 PM
It's just you.
Mr. Socko
08-30-2007, 10:31 PM
lol
Then explain the kid.
jimmy
08-30-2007, 10:31 PM
:midorgasm:
Mr. Socko
08-30-2007, 10:53 PM
Crack does that.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 12:39 AM
Would your reaction be the same when you saw Superman or Spider-Man? You might think it was silly until they acted. And really, do you think Bale's suit looked more scary than just odd?
His suit looks like wow that guy could kick my ass. Superman isn't really about theatrics, he would steal all the guns you had on you faster then you could say WTF just happened and as for Spider-man I don't think he is trying to spread fear. Like I said the Bale suit looks like an ass kicker and that I would have to hit twice as hard for him to feel it.
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 12:43 AM
Is it just me or does that look like George Clooney in that picture?
A little bit, yeah
hame4479
08-31-2007, 03:13 AM
This picture is so gay. Seriously: that guy dressed as batman just raped him from behind; that's why the little kid has his eyes rolled back.
THANK YOU!!!!!!! This costume could never work on screen. If you are trying to be a dark badass that kicks the **** out of criminals would you ever wear this? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hame4479
08-31-2007, 03:20 AM
actually i'd give that honor to the new Iron Man suit. and Spidey's movie duds were very close, but they don't look like they were made by a poor kid from queens, which is my biggest complaint.
Ya but he is a genious who could easily come up with new flexible fabrics. Besides would you rather have spidey look like a bum in a shoddy spandex suit? And yes Iron Mans new getup is about as faithful as it could ever get. THANX JON!!!! On a side note Adi Granov is a ****ing comic god, I would love to see what his batsuit would look like. There is so much realism injected into his art.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 09:56 AM
And yet it has worked for over seventy years in the comics. Worked so well that people have brought the character to the screen many times. It works on paper, and it would work on film. When Batman grabbed those bladed batarangs and took a fighting stance in Dead End, he looked like he could kick some ass.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 09:57 AM
comics have worked for seventy years yet comic book movies have only been really working since 2000
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 09:59 AM
actually earlier then that, I wasn't thinking about Superman or Batman 89,
majemma
08-31-2007, 10:18 AM
the new suit looks funny when he is perched....but i like the neck
Gianakin_
08-31-2007, 10:38 AM
And yet it has worked for over seventy years in the comics. Worked so well that people have brought the character to the screen many times. It works on paper, and it would work on film. When Batman grabbed those bladed batarangs and took a fighting stance in Dead End, he looked like he could kick some ass.
IMO he looked ridiculous. Just like every film Collora has done.
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 10:42 AM
That is an overly cartoonish drawing done that way for a certain effect. Comic version Batman would work just fine, the same way Spider-Man does.
Minus the shiny finish, this suit would work great on film.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/SDCCBatman04.jpg
Glitterman to the rescue!!!!!
Also is that the same suit the guy is trying to sell in the bat-world forums.
PS: Spandex only looks good on Jessica Alba.......thats it.....
Gianakin_
08-31-2007, 10:50 AM
PS: Spandex only looks good on Jessica Alba.......thats it.....
LOL! This is signature material!
JamalYIgle
08-31-2007, 11:13 AM
And yet it has worked for over seventy years in the comics. Worked so well that people have brought the character to the screen many times. It works on paper, and it would work on film. When Batman grabbed those bladed batarangs and took a fighting stance in Dead End, he looked like he could kick some ass.
No it works on paper because we say it does. Not everything translates well on film.
Shoemeister
08-31-2007, 11:13 AM
This picture is so gay. Seriously: that guy dressed as batman just raped him from behind; that's why the little kid has his eyes rolled back.
These were my thoughts exactly. Homo to the maxxxorz.
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 11:38 AM
Comic Books get a lot more chances(hundreds of issues for some), But in the movies, you got one chance at the most 2-3, A fabric suit with manties on over it would instantly bring back thoughts of Schumacher, and those are Franchise killing-long walks into the desert to never be heard from again-type thoughts.
Schumacher never used spandex suits.
Brian Braddock
08-31-2007, 11:56 AM
Not professionally, at least.
His personal life is probably another matter entirely though..........
Hole Shot
08-31-2007, 12:05 PM
And yet it has worked for over seventy years in the comics. Worked so well that people have brought the character to the screen many times. It works on paper, and it would work on film. When Batman grabbed those bladed batarangs and took a fighting stance in Dead End, he looked like he could kick some ass.
No, he looked stupid in Dead End.
Several different creative teams have taken on Batman since 89 and the suit has been black body armor every time. Why do you think that is? Do you really think that costume designers haven't looked at what Batman looks like in the comics and didn't at least attempt to mimic it?
No, he looked stupid in Dead End.
Several different creative teams have taken on Batman since 89 and the suit has been black body armor every time. Why do you think that is? Do you really think that costume designers haven't looked at what Batman looks like in the comics and didn't at least attempt to mimic it?
Exactly!
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 12:16 PM
Schumacher never used spandex suits.
He didnt have enough time.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 01:25 PM
Ya unless I see an amazing spandex suit I will continue to say that spandex suit doesnt look good on film.
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 01:26 PM
Spandexman should never come into the Bat-World on film, ever!
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 01:27 PM
Ya, I don't know why people think it looks good. I hated all the Batman costumes in all the fan films. I mean good job for doing it but I still didn't like it
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 02:45 PM
Dead End looked great. Batman looks great in the comics. Black fake rubber muscles looks stiff, slow, and hot as hell. You couldn't catch a snail in that stuff, let alone a criminal. For Christ's sake, Keaton couldn't even move his head in the 89 movie. Clooney looked like the Gimp from Pulp Fiction. This is what Batman looks like.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/Region.jpg
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 02:48 PM
Thats the 89 suit which I still think was terrible
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 02:59 PM
Oh, and Batman does not wear eye makeup either. How gay is that?
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 03:01 PM
find a mask that fits perfectly on his eyes without impeding vision.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 03:03 PM
If I was the costume designer on a movie, I would. I hardly think they are waiting for me to find their props for them. If they are, they know where to find me.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 03:04 PM
Well look you can't fit a mask around the eye without showing some skin. When you show that skin it kind of kills it. Also putting the make up makes his eyes stand out in an all black suit.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 03:14 PM
Yeah, well, for two hundred million, I think they can come up with a solution, because that eye makeup looks very silly. Lenses has been brought up many times. I think that is a good idea. It further conceals identity, and it is, once again, closer to the comics.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 03:19 PM
how are lenses closer to the comics?
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 03:21 PM
Dead End Batman looks like he's always getting ready to sleep.
Because he has night vision lenses in the comics.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 03:23 PM
What comic is that, only night vision I have seen him use is like binoculars.
Hole Shot
08-31-2007, 03:24 PM
Dead End looked great.
Dead End looked stupid.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 03:30 PM
How? Because in the comics, Batman has white lenses in the mask, that's how. The only artist who does not use them is Alex Ross. I am a little taken aback by that question. Do you read the comics ever? The same way Spider-Man always has lenses, Batman does. From the very first Batman story through the modern era.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/batman.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/batman-20060214051107669.jpg
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 03:32 PM
I was not wild about the Dead End cowl, but the cape, the suit, the gloves, the blades, all looked like a guy who was able to, and about to fight.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 03:32 PM
Those aren't lenses though. Those are his eyes, you wanted a suit that looks more like the comic then you want to add lenses that would work with a suit like the new TDK suit which one is it?
In the comics Batman conveys emotion through his eyes something that he can't do with lenses.
Green Goblin 1964
08-31-2007, 03:42 PM
How? Because in the comics, Batman has white lenses in the mask, that's how. The only artist who does not use them is Alex Ross. I am a little taken aback by that question. Do you read the comics ever? The same way Spider-Man always has lenses, Batman does. From the very first Batman story through the modern era.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/batman.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/batman-20060214051107669.jpg:dry:
http://www.iogc.net/images/iogc/Teenage%20Mutant%20Ninja%20Turtles%201.jpg
I guess they have lenses too...:o
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 03:44 PM
Ninja Turtles is an obvious parody. Deliberately more cartoonish. Irrelevant to this discussion.
Those are lenses in almost all Batman pics. Look at them. You see no pupils. Just like Wolverine, Spider-Man and others. Black Cat, Batgirl, Captain America, no lenses, you can see their eyes. The difference is obvious.
One can say that lenses may or may not work in a movie. That is a matter of opinion. But to say that clear white fields are a man's eyes just makes no sense. Are you telling me you can't see the difference between the first three pics (all white) and the last (pupils showing)?
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/bat3.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/bat2.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/bat1.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/rossbatman.jpg
Hole Shot
08-31-2007, 03:44 PM
How? Because in the comics, Batman has white lenses in the mask, that's how.
Again with this.
That is the worst logic when it comes to visualization - "because that's how it was in the comics." Are you that "That's Joker What a Joke" guy?
Batman has lenses in the comic because it's a lot easier to draw simple white spots than an actual pupil that would get lost in the cowl. If they tried that in the films, he couldn't show anger, fear or any other type of emotion.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 03:45 PM
Ninja Turtles is obviously more cartoonish. A parody, a farce. But if they looked like that in the 3-D world, they would have lenses, yeah.
Green Goblin 1964
08-31-2007, 03:49 PM
Those are lenses. Look at the pics. You see no pupils. Just like Wolverine, Spider-Man and others. Black Cat, Batgirl, Captain America, no lenses, you can see their eyes. The difference is obvious.
Wolverine doesn't have lenses either man....
The hell it's just how they draw them don't mean they have lenses...
Are you high? LOL
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 03:52 PM
The white eyes make the superheros look menacing. There are no lenses involved.
Saint
08-31-2007, 04:01 PM
What comic is that, only night vision I have seen him use is like binoculars.
Then you obviously aren't paying attention. Batman has worn lenses in the comics for years. It started with night vision lenses (These are seen throughout plenty of comics, but if you need a specific example, KnightsEnd comes to mind), and eventually evolved into multi-purpose lenses. Now, the lenses are capable of multiple vision modes (thermograph, for example), and even have a heads-up display tied to the computer in the cave (see the opening issue of HUSH).
Mitthrawnuruodo
08-31-2007, 04:07 PM
I'm not really lovin the new suit guys. Its a bit lame in my opinion.
I prefered the BB suit, and infact the Burton suits, and the BF suit to this new one. Very disappointed.
I thought they were trying out a new fabric this time?
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 04:13 PM
If you can't see the difference between the eyes in Captain America's mask and Wolverine's, you need lenses, contact lenses. Next, you'll tell me those are Spider-Man's eyes.
jimmy
08-31-2007, 04:15 PM
Dead End looked great. Batman looks great in the comics. Black fake rubber muscles looks stiff, slow, and hot as hell. You couldn't catch a snail in that stuff, let alone a criminal. FOr Christ's sake, Keaton couldn't even move his head in the 89 movie. Clooney looked like the Gimp from Pulp Fiction. This is what Batman looks like.
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/Region.jpg
Stop posting this picture. No wonder this mock-up of a Batman is standing on top of a sewer main -- THIS COSTUME IS DOOKIE!
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 04:15 PM
I'm not really lovin the new suit guys. Its a bit lame in my opinion.
I prefered the BB suit, and infact the Burton suits, and the BF suit to this new one. Very disappointed.
I thought they were trying out a new fabric this time?
You dont like the pic where hes standing on the cop car?
jimmy
08-31-2007, 04:16 PM
There is fabric; it's just under the armor plates.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 04:19 PM
No pupils.....
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/wolverine202.gif
Pupils...
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/captain20america.jpg
And by the way, that Bat pic is coooool.
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 04:20 PM
No pupils.....
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/wolverine202.gif
Pupils...
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/captain20america.jpg
And by the way, that Bat pic is coooool.
Not the leaked ones :down
jimmy
08-31-2007, 04:21 PM
WTG? Isn't this a thread about Batman? Why are Captain America and Wolverine in here?
itsthebatman
08-31-2007, 04:22 PM
Stop posting this picture. No wonder this mock-up of a Batman is standing on top of a sewer main -- THIS COSTUME IS DOOKIE!
Gotta agree with you Jimmy, I do not like this suit at all. The cape looks very restrictive, for one thing.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 04:22 PM
I meant the one on the sewer grate. To me, that looks like what Batman would be like in real life. I don't care for the new movie pics either. Looks like Robocop with pointy ears.
Hole Shot
08-31-2007, 04:22 PM
No pupils.....
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/wolverine202.gif
Pupils...
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/captain20america.jpg
And by the way, that Bat pic is coooool.
Look how much mask is clear of the eyes in the Captain America pic.
I meant the one on the sewer grate. To me, that looks like what Batman would be like in real life.
Why would someone in real life wear panties over their pants and stick white lenses over their eyes?
jimmy
08-31-2007, 04:25 PM
Look how NOT DEAD Captain America is. . . .
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 04:32 PM
We can ask a million WHY questions about super heroes and their costumes. That is not the issue here. But anybody can see pupils versus solid white. Seme characters, Spider-Man for example, have huge areas of white, some like Batman, have smaller. But large or small, you can see lenses versus eyes. Again, look at the Ross versus other artrists post. How much more obvious can it be?
Hole Shot
08-31-2007, 04:34 PM
We can ask a million WHY questions about super heroes and their costumes. That is not the issue here. But anybody can see pupils versus solid white. Seme characters, Spider-Man for example, have huge areas of white, some like Batman, have smaller. But large or small, you can see lenses versus eyes. Again, look at the Ross versus other artrists post. How much more obvious can it be?
And Spider-Man doesn't show emotion through his eyes, but Batman does even with the solid white.
Mr. Socko
08-31-2007, 05:07 PM
Stop posting this picture. No wonder this mock-up of a Batman is standing on top of a sewer main -- THIS COSTUME IS DOOKIE!
I think it's a cool picture, besides the padded shoulders, I'd love to one day see something like that on screen. You mind telling me what's so 'dookie' about it? If you're serious when you say that.
But I'm tired of the rubber/spandex arguments. It's apparent what we're getting and it looks just fine.
Stop posting this picture. No wonder this mock-up of a Batman is standing on top of a sewer main -- THIS COSTUME IS DOOKIE!
I always thought that suit looked really dark and cool. I just don't like the shoulders and how the material looks like suede.
hame4479
08-31-2007, 05:33 PM
The white eyes make the superheros look menacing. There are no lenses involved.
Actually in Batmans case they actually are lenses, it says so in the DC fact dictionary.
It's ok. Saint I think already set the record straight. And thus, the topic is dead...for now.
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 05:37 PM
Whats this whole white lenses thing about?
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 05:39 PM
That's not funny.
Whats not?
hame4479
08-31-2007, 05:40 PM
Honestly I wish he had retractable lenses in the film that he could use at specific instances, like say when he is riding the bike or needs to use night vision or binoculars. It could all be built into the lenses.
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 05:42 PM
Honestly I wish he had retractable lenses in the film that he could use at specific instances, like say when he is riding the bike or needs to use night vision or binoculars. It could all be built into the lenses.
That would look pretty stupid. I hope to god he dosent have white lenses!
D4rkShaDoWz
08-31-2007, 05:55 PM
Honestly I wish he had retractable lenses in the film that he could use at specific instances, like say when he is riding the bike or needs to use night vision or binoculars. It could all be built into the lenses.
or they could just design contacts like that.
hame4479
08-31-2007, 05:56 PM
They dont have to be pure white. I was thinking more along the lines of reflective/silverish and style wise prolly something like the ones used in DareDevil.
Conebone69
08-31-2007, 06:00 PM
They dont have to be pure white. I was thinking more along the lines of reflective/silverish and style wise prolly something like the ones used in DareDevil.
That would still look dumb. I just want his normal eyes and thats it! If they change it then im gonna be pissed
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 06:08 PM
After glancing through my graphic novels and few comics I bought about Batman I have found no where, where it is blatant or actually mention lenses over his cowl please enlighten men to which comics to read to find it then..
Since we are throwing pictures uphttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a8/DeadpoolYellowBoxes.jpg
http://www.zanaducomics.com/08dcaugust04/GreenArrowArchersQuestTP.jpg
http://members.aol.com/whoclix/icflash.gif
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a6/Barryallen-kitson.JPG/225px-Barryallen-kitson.JPG
http://www.tumbaabierta.com/noticias/img/the_flash_barry_allen.jpg
so right they are uh lenses?
I don't think there's any reason to believe they'll make that kind of change.
hame4479
08-31-2007, 06:36 PM
Read the DC Encyclopedia or whatever the **** its called and it has a rundown of all bats gear and says straight up he has lenses built into his cowl. Go to the bookstore they prolly have what im talkin about. Another example is say in the beginning of Hush when batman is taking out those thugs and their are first person views of him doing it their is a hud almost terminator style in the view because he is wearing high tech lenses.
hame4479
08-31-2007, 06:37 PM
Its Batman fact I can't believe no one here knows this.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 06:52 PM
The cowl also contains shifting lenses that identifies suspects identities, weak points through medical records, while avoiding the possibility of eye identification. The cowl has special visions, like infrared vision (heat sensors), night vision, and ultraviolet vision.[6] It is implied that Oracle manages his cowl's computer. In addition, one of the cowl's ears carries a high-gain antenna for an internal comm-link on the left side of the cowl, allowing Batman to stay in contact with his allies.[7]
Found that stuff on wikipedia, I have no idea if it is indeed true I am going on the word of who said its true and that that it is. It goes against my point so I begrudgingly put it up there.
Some people here want all that and more crammed into http://www.louanders.com/uploaded_images/Batman-706327.JPG
and not something where it looks more fitting like http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/69/Batmannewsuit.jpg
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 06:53 PM
Its Batman fact I can't believe no one here knows this.
I don't think its truly set in stone only because I am reading my comics and stuff and he has yet to use it at all if he has it.
hame4479
08-31-2007, 07:13 PM
Im getting this info from the DC Dictionary: The definitive guide to the characters of the DC universe. I stress the word DEFINITIVE. Let me say that more time I will even underline it DEFINITIVE.
CaptainClown
08-31-2007, 07:25 PM
So he still doesn't use it then
Ender Durden
08-31-2007, 07:43 PM
wutever
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 08:00 PM
For anyone who says lenses look silly, they sure ain't any sillier than friggin' makeup. That is the worst. Batman has lenses in the comics, they are one more thing to hide his identity, and eye makeup is ridiculous. Yo' honuh, ah rests mah case.
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 08:02 PM
Please stop posting pics of Glitterman....
now go ahead and post more b/c you want to be cute........:D :dry:
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 08:13 PM
Besides the shimmer in the suit, Glitterman makes a great Batman. A duller finish and a better belt, and he looks like a walking comic book.
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 08:15 PM
He looks like he's ready for bed.......the going to sleep kind not the other.
Ender Durden
08-31-2007, 08:16 PM
when he turns his head his whole cape goes with it lol
DeaDheaD
08-31-2007, 08:18 PM
The cowl looks like its made from a trash bag and, it doesnt fit at alllllllllll.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 08:43 PM
No, Batman does NOT show emotion through his eyes. They are not seen because of the lenses in the mask. This is a great illustration of why comic fans get pissed at Johnny Come Lately fans. Not only did we have to point out that Batman does have lenses in the comics, someone had to actually cite a definitive source because some people apparently can't tell the difference between blank white eyes and pupils. But then some people still insist that their way is better than the way the creators and custodians of the characters have been successfully doing things for decades. These characters work. They do not need any help from people who are not even that farmiliar with them to begin with.
gwynplaine
08-31-2007, 09:06 PM
J. H Williams III, i think that's his name, draws a great Batman in the current monthly title.
Mr. Socko
08-31-2007, 09:45 PM
Get off the lenses people, Batman doesn't wear them in the films. I don't see the point of rambling on about something that ain't happening.
slave2catwoman
08-31-2007, 10:19 PM
I guess we should just be satisfied with mascara. Hey, it works for Cindy Crawford......
Hole Shot
09-01-2007, 01:18 AM
http://www.louanders.com/uploaded_images/Batman-706327.JPG
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/69/Batmannewsuit.jpg
jee? who looks like they could kick who's arse?
Hole Shot
09-01-2007, 01:21 AM
No, Batman does NOT show emotion through his eyes. They are not seen because of the lenses in the mask. This is a great illustration of why comic fans get pissed at Johnny Come Lately fans. .
Um? Sorry you're wrong!!! You in fact, posted a picture of him enraged and it totally came from the eyes.
jimmy
09-01-2007, 01:21 AM
Dear god, it's like the spandex Batman is ready to whip out his wang. :(
Conebone69
09-01-2007, 01:57 AM
jee? who looks like they could kick who's arse?
I dont know how many times im gonna say this but I hope batmans suit looks like the pic of him standing on the cop car
Devan
09-01-2007, 02:00 AM
I dont know how many times im gonna say this but I hope batmans suit looks like the pic of him standing on the cop car
...how can it look like itself.
It's just a different angle.
CaptainClown
09-01-2007, 02:01 AM
soo batmans cowl has lenses mmhm..
Ender Durden
09-01-2007, 02:08 AM
soooo batmans cowl is just black cloth huh? ok lets just fit that onto Bale. hhmm looks good.
now lets frickin stick some black undies on him and we're set.
Conebone69
09-01-2007, 02:08 AM
...how can it look like itself.
It's just a different angle.
Huh, im just sayin I hope he looks like that. And I hope the suit dosent look as horrible as it did in the banned pics
Brian Braddock
09-01-2007, 06:02 AM
Bale's Batman isn't going to have lenses in his cowl this time around people - just face it.
If you really need to get your 'lenses in a Batman movie cowl' fix so bad then here you go - because it's the closest your'e gonna get:-
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/capture-2.jpg
KILLING JOKER
09-01-2007, 06:08 AM
Huh, im just sayin I hope he looks like that. And I hope the suit dosent look as horrible as it did in the banned pics
I'll 2nd that
Silver Knight
09-01-2007, 09:34 AM
Ok we really need new promo pics.
slave2catwoman
09-01-2007, 09:58 AM
Holeshot, I posted a bunch of pics clearly showing that Batman's eyes are blank, with the notable exception of Alex Ross' drawing, pretty much the ONLY artist to draw Batman without the lenses. For seventy years, just about every other artist has NOT shown pupils. And, as pointed out earlier, the DC guides clearly state that the Bat cowl has lenses.
CaptainClown
09-01-2007, 01:31 PM
It says he has retractable lenses not permanent lenses
Mr. Socko
09-01-2007, 01:43 PM
soo batmans cowl has lenses mmhm..
What would make you think he has lenses in this movie?
Conebone69
09-01-2007, 02:05 PM
This question is for all the people who went to WWC. Did the batsuit look more like the ones in the banned pics or the one where bats is standing on the cop car?
CaptainClown
09-01-2007, 02:57 PM
What would make you think he has lenses in this movie?
It wasn't in the movie some guys brought up "it is Batman canon that he has lenses in his cowl"
Infinity9999x
09-01-2007, 06:11 PM
jee? who looks like they could kick who's arse?
Using fan made spandex costumes as an argument against making a more comic accurate film suit is asinine. Of course a suit that someone makes at home isn't going to look as good as a suit that has thousands of dollars put into it :whatever:
I would have loved a more comic accurate suit, and I'm not a fan of the new suit design. Will it kill the movie for me? No, but it's one of those things that will always bug me, because I think they were so close to making a perfect suit.
All they needed to do was slim down the BB suit a bit, and either darken the Bat or lighten the torso, and we'd have a suit that would retain an armored look while being extremely comic accurate. It's too bad, Nolan missed out on a great chance to make an awesome costume that was comic accurate at the same time.
Using fan made spandex costumes as an argument against making a more comic accurate film suit is asinine. Of course a suit that someone makes at home isn't going to look as good as a suit that has thousands of dollars put into it :whatever:
I would have loved a more comic accurate suit, and I'm not a fan of the new suit design. Will it kill the movie for me? No, but it's one of those things that will always bug me, because I think they were so close to making a perfect suit.
All they needed to do was slim down the BB suit a bit, and either darken the Bat or lighten the torso, and we'd have a suit that would retain an armored look while being extremely comic accurate. It's too bad, Nolan missed out on a great chance to make an awesome costume that was comic accurate at the same time.
I think what he meant was about the high contrast coloring and the spandex with the bat draws. That would be the most "faithful" rendition, and it would also look the most ludicrous on screen. I still think adding grey to it would make him look less scary, although I have to agree with you on the symbol thing.
Hole Shot
09-01-2007, 06:23 PM
Using fan made spandex costumes as an argument against making a more comic accurate film suit is asinine. Of course a suit that someone makes at home isn't going to look as good as a suit that has thousands of dollars put into it :whatever:
asinine is my middle name baby! :wow:
I would have loved a more comic accurate suit, and I'm not a fan of the new suit design. Will it kill the movie for me? No, but it's one of those things that will always bug me, because I think they were so close to making a perfect suit.
All they needed to do was slim down the BB suit a bit, and either darken the Bat or lighten the torso, and we'd have a suit that would retain an armored look while being extremely comic accurate. It's too bad, Nolan missed out on a great chance to make an awesome costume that was comic accurate at the same time.
This is an argument for a more comic accurate suit that I can accept, a compromise between the two. Do you dislike every shot of the new suit? I think it looks awesome on top the car and in the night shot from the leaked photos, but not too stoked about it when I saw it the light. I do believe lighting, editing and camera angles are going hide many of its flaws when we see the finished product.
Therefore, such as, south africa and duh-Iraq.
I think what he meant was about the high contrast coloring and the spandex with the bat draws. That would be the most "faithful" rendition, and it would also look the most ludicrous on screen
Exactly.
CConn
09-01-2007, 08:01 PM
jee? who looks like they could kick who's arse?
Actually, the dude on top looks a lot more naturally physically imposing.
Bale looks like he's just some guy in a nice bit of armor.
IMO, at least.
jimmy
09-01-2007, 08:09 PM
Dude, anyone can look physically imposing when they stand next to a little kid and wear tights that eat their ass up.
CConn
09-01-2007, 08:28 PM
But that dude isn't standing next to a little kid. :o
jimmy
09-01-2007, 08:30 PM
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g189/slavekal/SDCCBatman04.jpg
CConn
09-01-2007, 09:15 PM
I had never seen that picture before, yet I still thought he looked physically imposing.
Stop being stupid.
Ender Durden
09-01-2007, 10:02 PM
who cares, guy in tights can be hurt.
urban legend nutcase in bullet-proof, bat-themed armor is a wwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeee bit tougher
to me that would scare me even more.
CConn
09-01-2007, 10:45 PM
who cares, guy in tights can be hurt.
urban legend nutcase in bullet-proof, bat-themed armor is a wwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeee bit tougher
to me that would scare me even more.
The guy in tights would still be an urban legend nutcase.
Also, as I've proven about 50 times, but apparently everyone here is too dense to remember, amazingly, you can wear a cloth costume and still have armor underneath the cloth.
Crow222
09-01-2007, 10:47 PM
Pajama-man needs to not show up on film
Conebone69
09-01-2007, 10:54 PM
This question is for all the people who went to WWC. Did the batsuit look more like the ones in the banned pics or the one where bats is standing on the cop car?
Could anyone answer this? ^
Axtech
09-01-2007, 10:59 PM
Could anyone answer this? ^
...they're the same suit
Infinity9999x
09-01-2007, 11:07 PM
asinine is my middle name baby! :wow:
Thats...quite impressive actually.
This is an argument for a more comic accurate suit that I can accept, a compromise between the two. Do you dislike every shot of the new suit? I think it looks awesome on top the car and in the night shot from the leaked photos, but not too stoked about it when I saw it the light. I do believe lighting, editing and camera angles are going hide many of its flaws when we see the finished product.
Therefore, such as, south africa and duh-Iraq.
I don't dislike every shot. I didn't mind the shot of him on the car, and like I said, I'm really kind of in the middle ground. I don't hate the suit, but I don't like it really either. I think the reason I want a more comic accurate suit is simply because I'm tired of the same old thing. I want something besides a bulky looking suit.
Exactly.
Ahh, I can understand that. I've never been a fan of lighter colors either. When I said I wanted the BB suit lightened, I didn't mean drastically. I mean just a bit, so there was a distinction between the bat symbol and chest (which was what I thought the whole point of having the symbol was to begin with, so people could see it).
I would have my ideal suit a dark charcoal gray, which would actually blend in with a cityscape better then straight black.
Infinity9999x
09-01-2007, 11:09 PM
The guy in tights would still be an urban legend nutcase.
Also, as I've proven about 50 times, but apparently everyone here is too dense to remember, amazingly, you can wear a cloth costume and still have armor underneath the cloth.
Or have the cloth be an armor. They have already invented bulletproof t-shirts and the army is developing liquid armor. It wouldn't be a huge step to assume that Batman (with his advanced resources) could invent a fabric like armor that worked just as well as traditional bulky armor.
Conebone69
09-01-2007, 11:23 PM
...they're the same suit
Yeah I know but one looks awesome and the other looks like crap. So I just wanna which one it looked like in the footage
jimmy
09-01-2007, 11:25 PM
I had never seen that picture before, yet I still thought he looked physically imposing.
Stop being stupid.
Okay, okay, okay. . .
Actually, If I saw him I'd be afraid of him. The first thing that would come to my mind if I saw a man dressed in ass-eating spandex and hot leather is rape. I'd only run out of fear that he'd rape me.
Axtech
09-01-2007, 11:33 PM
Yeah I know but one looks awesome and the other looks like crap. So I just wanna which one it looked like in the footage
I think that's just a matter of lighting, really. The police car pic is more of a "finished product" shot, whereas the leaked pics are just pictures taken during filming. The people who were at WW said that the lighting in the clips was a lot different from how it appears in the leaked pics, so I'd imagine that on film, the batsuit will look more like that first official pic than these leaked pics.
Mr. Socko
09-01-2007, 11:37 PM
I think I like the Begins suit more than this thing.
Conebone69
09-01-2007, 11:39 PM
I think that's just a matter of lighting, really. The police car pic is more of a "finished product" shot, whereas the leaked pics are just pictures taken during filming. The people who were at WW said that the lighting in the clips was a lot different from how it appears in the leaked pics, so I'd imagine that on film, the batsuit will look more like that first official pic than these leaked pics.
Awesome, that makes me feel alot better, thanks man
KILLING JOKER
09-02-2007, 12:40 AM
I think I like the Begins suit more than this thing.
Agreed
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 12:46 AM
I think I like the Begins suit more than this thing.
I thought so at first too but then the new suit kinda grew on me and now I like them both. But im really happy that were gonna see the old suit again in TDK. But im not so sure if I like the look of that weird metal thing on his wrist, whatever it is
CaptainClown
09-02-2007, 03:52 AM
Or have the cloth be an armor. They have already invented bulletproof t-shirts and the army is developing liquid armor. It wouldn't be a huge step to assume that Batman (with his advanced resources) could invent a fabric like armor that worked just as well as traditional bulky armor.
The liquid armor is still rather bulky and wouldn't look sleek, as for a cloth bullet proof costume would still hurt from the impact. I honestly wouldn't be able to get past him taking a shot with a thin cloth like suit and him walking away from it.
CConn
09-02-2007, 08:28 AM
Or have the cloth be an armor. They have already invented bulletproof t-shirts and the army is developing liquid armor. It wouldn't be a huge step to assume that Batman (with his advanced resources) could invent a fabric like armor that worked just as well as traditional bulky armor.
Exactly.
Now, that isn't to say I don't like the TDK suit. I do like it. But a fabric suit COULD be done if they wanted it to be, and it COULD be just as believable and "badass" as any rubber suit.
I mean, hell, in BB, instead of painting the armor black, Bruce could simply made a black fabric suit to cover it. It would have still be the exact same suit, it'd just be fabric too. (and actually, doing that would've allowed for it to be "battle damaged"...which would've been really cool. :o)
dark_b
09-02-2007, 08:51 AM
I think that's just a matter of lighting, really. The police car pic is more of a "finished product" shot, whereas the leaked pics are just pictures taken during filming. The people who were at WW said that the lighting in the clips was a lot different from how it appears in the leaked pics, so I'd imagine that on film, the batsuit will look more like that first official pic than these leaked pics.you do know that the leaked pics were meant to be realesed?
the only thing they would change would be that they would erase the wire behind batman.
so lighting you are talking about? maybe the pic that was taken with the mobile phone. but not those pics. the lighting is how it was on the set when filmed.
Gianakin_
09-02-2007, 08:53 AM
Lighting can't erase creases. But smart camera work can.
TheBatman072
09-02-2007, 09:29 AM
you do know that the leaked pics were meant to be realesed?
the only thing they would change would be that they would erase the wire behind batman.
so lighting you are talking about? maybe the pic that was taken with the mobile phone. but not those pics. the lighting is how it was on the set when filmed.
Not true. Simply not true.
I think that's just a matter of lighting, really. The police car pic is more of a "finished product" shot, whereas the leaked pics are just pictures taken during filming. The people who were at WW said that the lighting in the clips was a lot different from how it appears in the leaked pics, so I'd imagine that on film, the batsuit will look more like that first official pic than these leaked pics.
Though if you remember back to when the police car shot came out there was a lot of complaining about the lighting in the shot and how the suit looked. People sort of chalked it up as not being actual finished lighting that you'd have in the movie. The leaked pics were exactly what those people said to wait for before making a real judgment.
Axtech
09-02-2007, 11:17 AM
you do know that the leaked pics were meant to be realesed?
the only thing they would change would be that they would erase the wire behind batman.
so lighting you are talking about? maybe the pic that was taken with the mobile phone. but not those pics. the lighting is how it was on the set when filmed.
Yes, of course I am aware that they were meant to be released eventually.
Yes, that's how the lighting looks while filming, but that's not how the lighting will look in the finished film. Like I said, people who were at WW reported that the scenes shown in the leaked pics (such as the interrogation room) were much darker and more saturated than in the leaked pics. Movies are filmed with bright lighting to capture as much sharp detail as possible...
Axtech
09-02-2007, 11:18 AM
Though if you remember back to when the police car shot came out there was a lot of complaining about the lighting in the shot and how the suit looked. People sort of chalked it up as not being actual finished lighting that you'd have in the movie. The leaked pics were exactly what those people said to wait for before making a real judgment.
No, the leaked pics are just shots taken on set in the lighting used to film, NOT the finished on-screen product.
Mitthrawnuruodo
09-02-2007, 11:58 AM
who cares, guy in tights can be hurt.
urban legend nutcase in bullet-proof, bat-themed armor is a wwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeee bit tougher
to me that would scare me even more.
The movie audience knows Bale is wearing rubber, right?
They suspend belief and pretend thats is armor.
Why can't the fans and audience suspend belief again, and believe that if Bale were to wear a Spiderman/FF type suit, that it would be armor of some sort?
I mean, the modern military armor looks closer to armorweave than rubber afterall.
No, the leaked pics are just shots taken on set in the lighting used to film, NOT the finished on-screen product.
You're missing the point. It's always, "Oh the suit will look better in the next pic". That or the classic, "Let's see how it moves". It's just amusing is all.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 12:36 PM
Though if you remember back to when the police car shot came out there was a lot of complaining about the lighting in the shot and how the suit looked. People sort of chalked it up as not being actual finished lighting that you'd have in the movie. The leaked pics were exactly what those people said to wait for before making a real judgment.
So your sayin he'll look like he did in the leaked pics
So your sayin he'll look like he did in the leaked pics
Well yeah imo he will. That's not what I was saying though. I was commenting on how every time a new pic or pics comes out, there's a group of people who insist we reserve judgment on the suit until the next image comes out. As long as the suit continues to look bad that is. The fall back line being "lets wait until we see it in action".
gwynplaine
09-02-2007, 12:51 PM
Maybe just a very brief powerful flashing of white lights in the cowl lenses to blind evildoers and then back to Bale's eyes. Just a few seconds for the comic fans and a possible weapon for Batman.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 01:44 PM
Well yeah imo he will. That's not what I was saying though. I was commenting on how every time a new pic or pics comes out, there's a group of people who insist we reserve judgment on the suit until the next image comes out. As long as the suit continues to look bad that is. The fall back line being "lets wait until we see it in action".
I thought the suit was gonna look more like the first official pic on screen
I thought the suit was gonna look more like the first official pic on screen
In what way? When that came out, it was nothing but complaining as far as the lighting is concerned. Now it's the same for the leaked pics. As far as the angle, I would expect more shots of the suit from the front in the movie, than the three quarter view as seen in the initial reveal. WB chose this angle specifically since it clearly looks the best.
BatScot
09-02-2007, 02:51 PM
Also, as I've proven about 50 times, but apparently everyone here is too dense to remember, amazingly, you can wear a cloth costume and still have armor underneath the cloth.Not everyone.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 04:59 PM
In what way? When that came out, it was nothing but complaining as far as the lighting is concerned. Now it's the same for the leaked pics. As far as the angle, I would expect more shots of the suit from the front in the movie, than the three quarter view as seen in the initial reveal. WB chose this angle specifically since it clearly looks the best.
The old pic of the batsuit looks way more stronger, durable, flexible and just overall cooler then the new leaked pics. You get what im sayin? The leaked pics of the suit looks really cheesy and it looks like its made out of some cheap, crappy material
CaptainClown
09-02-2007, 05:01 PM
The old pic of the batsuit looks way more stronger, durable, flexible and just overall cooler then the new leaked pics. You get what im sayin? The leaked pics of the suit looks really cheesy and it looks like its made out of some cheap, crappy material
Ya when they describe it you think it moves with the muscles and stuff, but it looks like a lighter version of the original.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 05:02 PM
Ya when they describe it you think it moves with the muscles and stuff, but it looks like a lighter version of the original.
Then the BB suit?
CaptainClown
09-02-2007, 05:04 PM
ya the bb suit
COMPO
09-02-2007, 05:14 PM
has anyone got a pic of the suit you're talking about.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 05:16 PM
has anyone got a pic of the suit you're talking about.
The leaked pics?
COMPO
09-02-2007, 05:17 PM
yeah.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 05:26 PM
yeah.
We cant post em but someone could PM them to you. I would do it but I dont have the pics on this comp im on
COMPO
09-02-2007, 05:28 PM
Thanks. Could anyone PM me the leaked suit pics?
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 05:31 PM
Thanks. Could anyone PM me the leaked suit pics?
There actually not just pics of batman, theres other pics of joker, the batmen, alfred ect
COMPO
09-02-2007, 05:41 PM
I know i saw them. Was Joker actually kicking Batman in the balls?
Mr. Socko
09-02-2007, 05:44 PM
I thought it was the stomach lol
And it could have been a fake batman
COMPO
09-02-2007, 05:45 PM
S.o.b?
Antonello Blueberry
09-02-2007, 05:50 PM
I thought it was the stomach lol
And it could have been a fake batman
With the new suit? Difficult.
The old pic of the batsuit looks way more stronger, durable, flexible and just overall cooler then the new leaked pics. You get what im sayin? The leaked pics of the suit looks really cheesy and it looks like its made out of some cheap, crappy material
I think the suit looks sleeker in the EW pic. It's due to the angle and pose tho. Bale isn't bending at all and it's a three quarter up shot. The lighting helps it a little, or rather the lack there of. The leaked pics don't leave much to the imagination, that's the difference.
DeaDheaD
09-02-2007, 06:52 PM
With the new suit? Difficult.
And at the Wayne party...........these batmen know their stuff these days.
Mr. Socko
09-02-2007, 07:19 PM
With the new suit? Difficult.
Oh nvm, I thought it was the old suit. I'll take another look, haven't seen the pics in a while now.
Conebone69
09-02-2007, 11:47 PM
I think the suit looks sleeker in the EW pic. It's due to the angle and pose tho. Bale isn't bending at all and it's a three quarter up shot. The lighting helps it a little, or rather the lack there of. The leaked pics don't leave much to the imagination, that's the difference.
Exactly, wait, whats EW?
Rorschach II
09-02-2007, 11:58 PM
No, Batman does NOT show emotion through his eyes. They are not seen because of the lenses in the mask. This is a great illustration of why comic fans get pissed at Johnny Come Lately fans. Not only did we have to point out that Batman does have lenses in the comics, someone had to actually cite a definitive source because some people apparently can't tell the difference between blank white eyes and pupils. But then some people still insist that their way is better than the way the creators and custodians of the characters have been successfully doing things for decades. These characters work. They do not need any help from people who are not even that farmiliar with them to begin with.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Besides, a six foot tall bat without pupils is scarier than a six foot tall bat with pupils :yay:
Rorschach II
09-03-2007, 12:33 AM
Why would someone in real life ... stick white lenses over their eyes?
Batman is a mere mortal who transforms himself into a superhero. He fights against and alongside metahumans, but he has no superpowers of his own. So what does he do? He uses his wealth and his training to "simulate" superpowers. That's like, his thing. He's not invulnerable like the Man of Steel, but his expensive suit (should) protect against stabbings and bullets. He can't fly, but he can afford the Batwing, memory cloth, and other gadgets to help him out with that. He's not super-fast, but he's got the Batmobile and Batpod. Same thing with the lenses in his eyes and speakers in his cowl: he doesn't naturally have Superman's enhanced senses, but he can use his intellect and his resources to re-create them.
Conebone69
09-03-2007, 02:05 AM
EW = Entertainment Weekly
Oh, ok
Crow222
09-03-2007, 02:14 AM
Batman is a mere mortal who transforms himself into a superhero. He fights against and alongside metahumans, but he has no superpowers of his own. So what does he do? He uses his wealth and his training to "simulate" superpowers. That's like, his thing. He's not invulnerable like the Man of Steel, but his expensive suit (should) protect against stabbings and bullets. He can't fly, but he can afford the Batwing, memory cloth, and other gadgets to help him out with that. He's not super-fast, but he's got the Batmobile and Batpod. Same thing with the lenses in his eyes and speakers in his cowl: he doesn't naturally have Superman's enhanced senses, but he can use his intellect and his resources to re-create them.
QFT
slave2catwoman
09-03-2007, 09:49 AM
Also, eyes are a major part of identifying a person. If I wanted to disguise myself, I would definitely cover my eyes.
Sandman138
09-03-2007, 09:56 AM
WTF does QFT mean?
sasquatchs
09-03-2007, 09:58 AM
I wouldn't want him to look as blind as a bat with white cataract eyes. Would just be comical in dialogue scenes. Besides that the loss of expression is too much a compromise for a film, especially when the mask is fixed in a frown
Gianakin_
09-03-2007, 10:00 AM
WTF does QFT mean?
Quoted for Truth
Sandman138
09-03-2007, 10:01 AM
Ah... lamez0rz.
slave2catwoman
09-03-2007, 12:14 PM
They work in the comics, they would work on film. A bunch of second guessers do not know better than the creators of the character. Once again, HUGE lenses and a full face mask works for Spider-Man. Amazing how successful things can be when you stick to the original concept without adding new "interpretations".
Devan
09-03-2007, 12:21 PM
They work in the comics, they would work on film. A bunch of second guessers do not know better than the creators of the character. Once again, HUGE lenses and a full face mask works for Spider-Man. Amazing how successful things can be when you stick to the original concept without adding new "interpretations".
Spider-man couldn't show any emotion in the movie...that's why he always took off his mask.
I'm all for lenses...but I don't like that comparison.
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 12:27 PM
Ya I am not a fan of superheros taking off their mask.
Devan
09-03-2007, 12:28 PM
Ya I am not a fan of superheros taking off their mask.
Especially if they cry half the time it is off.
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 12:30 PM
Especially if they cry half the time it is off.
lordy lord the trembling lip..
but seriously the only good example I saw was the DD costume and ya.. I don't think that would quite cut it.
Devan
09-03-2007, 12:31 PM
I liked dd's costume...but the movie was ass.
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 12:34 PM
how could you not like it... BULLSEYE AYE?! BULLSEYE! I NEVA MISS!!! (GROWL) BULLSEYE! MOR PEANUTS!
Gianakin_
09-03-2007, 12:36 PM
I love it when superheroes take off their mask. I was waiting for a shot of a maskless Batman right when Rachel falls asleep in the cave, but it never came. When Keaton takes off the mask in Batman Returns, that was the money shot of the movie for me. Thank God I had many of those in the Spiderman Trilogy.
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 12:38 PM
Ugh I hated those shots, but to each his or her own but man I hate it when they do that.
Gianakin_
09-03-2007, 12:41 PM
I love maskless heores so much, that when I was little, I'd only buy the hero action figure that you had the ability to take of his mask or the whole costume. From Power Rangers to Batman TAS to SM1.
It is these moments where you see both alter egos combined, I love it.
I love it when superheroes take off their mask. I was waiting for a shot of a maskless Batman right when Rachel falls asleep in the cave, but it never came. When Keaton takes off the mask in Batman Returns, that was the money shot of the movie for me. Thank God I had many of those in the Spiderman Trilogy.
Yeah, he takes off the mask and all the black around his eyes magically goes off with it.:o
Devan
09-03-2007, 12:44 PM
how could you not like it... BULLSEYE AYE?! BULLSEYE! I NEVA MISS!!! (GROWL) BULLSEYE! MOR PEANUTS!
It was ASS.
I love it when superheroes take off their mask. I was waiting for a shot of a maskless Batman right when Rachel falls asleep in the cave, but it never came. When Keaton takes off the mask in Batman Returns, that was the money shot of the movie for me. Thank God I had many of those in the Spiderman Trilogy.
I don't.
I love maskless heores so much, that when I was little, I'd only buy the hero action figure that you had the ability to take of his mask or the whole costume. From Power Rangers to Batman TAS to SM1.
It is these moments where you see both alter egos combined, I love it.
I like those toys...but that's different.
Gianakin_
09-03-2007, 12:45 PM
Yeah, he takes off the mask and all the black around his eyes magically goes off with it.:o
Didn't care then still don't.
Gianakin_
09-03-2007, 12:47 PM
I don't.
I like those toys...but that's different.
Fair enough and...
it is different, but I'm trying to say that one thing brought the other in my case.
Didn't care then still don't.
You go girl! :up:
sasquatchs
09-03-2007, 01:04 PM
There was a bit in the Begins script about the black around his eyes, probably set the wrong tone for that moment
Brian Braddock
09-03-2007, 01:09 PM
Didn't care then still don't.
There was a bit in the Begins script about the black around his eyes, probably set the wrong tone for that moment
Yeah, didnt he arrive back at the party at WM and Alfred had to remind him that he had it on? Yeah, tonally, that might have been a bit off.
Anyways, I agree with Gianakin's sentiments - In the grand scheme of all things TDK, the black eye paint issue isnt one of the things that bothers me a great deal
Yeah, paint is fine. But for it to come off with his mask is just...dumb? But most of Batman Returns was, so yeah it wasn't a big deal.
Juggernaut33
09-03-2007, 05:36 PM
Yeah, paint is fine. But for it to come off with his mask is just...dumb? But most of Batman Returns was, so yeah it wasn't a big deal.
Really? To me it was one of the most complexe comic book movie I've ever seen and will probably ever seen.
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 05:55 PM
Batman returns complex?
jimmy
09-03-2007, 06:08 PM
Tim Burton complex?
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 06:09 PM
Tim Burton complex?
ya that tops what I said..
jimmy
09-03-2007, 06:10 PM
Hahahahah!
:woot:
jimmy
09-03-2007, 06:12 PM
http://image.comicvine.com/uploads/item/2000/1699/76468-batman_400.jpg
Mitthrawnuruodo
09-03-2007, 07:07 PM
Also, eyes are a major part of identifying a person. If I wanted to disguise myself, I would definitely cover my eyes.
So would I, but I'd also cover my mouth.:oldrazz:
I'd like to see lenses though. DareDevil proved that they can work on film.
Conebone69
09-03-2007, 07:15 PM
Also, eyes are a major part of identifying a person. If I wanted to disguise myself, I would definitely cover my eyes.
But looking cool is also a major part. And white lenses dont look cool
Devan
09-03-2007, 07:18 PM
But looking cool is also a major part. And white lenses dont look cool
Thats all opinion...
For instance I think they look great.
Conebone69
09-03-2007, 07:21 PM
Thats all opinion...
For instance I think they look great.
Hmmm, I guess but the way I'd vision them is to look like crap
Devan
09-03-2007, 07:26 PM
Hmmm, I guess but the way I'd vision them is to look like crap
That would be the definition of opinion.:cwink:
Mitthrawnuruodo
09-03-2007, 07:32 PM
Does anyone else think like me, that the production value on the Nolan Batsuits has gone downhill with this new trilogy?
I mean, if you look at B89, BR, and BF, the suit progressively got better. Not only lighter, but more streamlined. More professional looking. The evidence is on the symbols on the chest. BF'd being the best.
I can understands the reason in BB, afterall, Brucew is just starting out, but now, in TDK, the suit looks just as B-movie. It looks like something the Green Goblin or a Powerranger would wear.
Conebone69
09-03-2007, 07:32 PM
That would be the definition of opinion.:cwink:
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) (http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna.html) - Cite This Source (http://dictionary.reference.com/cite.html?qh=opinion&ia=luna)
o·pin·ion http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/premium.gif http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pnghttp://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif (https://secure.reference.com/premium/login.html?rd=2&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.reference.com%2Fbrowse%2 Fopinion) /əˈpɪnhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngyən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-pin-yuhhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1.a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. 2.a personal view, attitude, or appraisal. 3.the formal expression of a professional judgment: to ask for a second medical opinion. 4.Law. the formal statement by a judge or court of the reasoning and the principles of law used in reaching a decision of a case. 5.a judgment or estimate of a person or thing with respect to character, merit, etc.: to forfeit someone's good opinion. 6.a favorable estimate; esteem: I haven't much of an opinion of him.
Saint
09-03-2007, 07:34 PM
After glancing through my graphic novels and few comics I bought about Batman I have found no where, where it is blatant or actually mention lenses over his cowl please enlighten men to which comics to read to find it then..
Batman #608. The end. You lose. Batman wears lenses, period. This has never actually been a debate: anyone who knows anything about Batman knows he wears lenses, and everyone in this thread has explained that to you repeatedly. They have appeared as far back as KnightsEnd, and probably even further. They feature prominently in Batman's defeat of Jean-Paul Valley in the closing chapter of that story. They are shown outright in comics frequently.
Devan
09-03-2007, 07:35 PM
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) (http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna.html) - Cite This Source (http://dictionary.reference.com/cite.html?qh=opinion&ia=luna)
o·pin·ion http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/premium.gif http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pnghttp://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif (https://secure.reference.com/premium/login.html?rd=2&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.reference.com%2Fbrowse%2 Fopinion) /əˈpɪnhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngyən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-pin-yuhhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1.a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. 2.a personal view, attitude, or appraisal. 3.the formal expression of a professional judgment: to ask for a second medical opinion. 4.Law. the formal statement by a judge or court of the reasoning and the principles of law used in reaching a decision of a case. 5.a judgment or estimate of a person or thing with respect to character, merit, etc.: to forfeit someone's good opinion. 6.a favorable estimate; esteem: I haven't much of an opinion of him.
I didn't see that coming...:whatever:
Just cuz you don't like them...doesn't mean we have to.
Conebone69
09-03-2007, 07:50 PM
I didn't see that coming...:whatever:
Just cuz you don't like them...doesn't mean we have to.
I know, but I bet alot of people dont what bats to have white lenses
Devan
09-03-2007, 07:52 PM
I know, but I bet alot of people dont what bats to have white lenses
Of course there are...and they are entitled to their own opinion.
It's all tastes...you can't force them upon each other, that's why a debate over it will never be won.
Mr. Socko
09-03-2007, 07:53 PM
Yeah, he takes off the mask and all the black around his eyes magically goes off with it.:o
I've always thought that was exactly why they didn't show Bale's face when he took the cowl off in Begins. We only saw his back when he was facing Rachel.
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 08:18 PM
Batman #608. The end. You lose. Batman wears lenses, period. This has never actually been a debate: anyone who knows anything about Batman knows he wears lenses, and everyone in this thread has explained that to you repeatedly. They have appeared as far back as KnightsEnd, and probably even further. They feature prominently in Batman's defeat of Jean-Paul Valley in the closing chapter of that story. They are shown outright in comics frequently.
Dude that was a while ago, I even said he has lenses pages ago. You must really want to prove me wrong well congrats, you did it. So how long did you spend looking for evidence of that?
Conebone69
09-03-2007, 08:58 PM
I've always thought that was exactly why they didn't show Bale's face when he took the cowl off in Begins. We only saw his back when he was facing Rachel.
Im pretty sure your right. Lol, he'd look emo
JoeCat
09-03-2007, 09:00 PM
I've always thought that was exactly why they didn't show Bale's face when he took the cowl off in Begins. We only saw his back when he was facing Rachel.
Good point.
BatScot
09-03-2007, 09:56 PM
Dude that was a while ago, I even said he has lenses pages ago. You must really want to prove me wrong well congrats, you did it. So how long did you spend looking for evidence of that?http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v434/Anthropod/temp/Batlenses.jpg
Batman: The Ultimate Guide to the Dark Knight (http://www.amazon.com/Batman-Ultimate-Guide-Dark-Knight/dp/0756611210)
Saint
09-03-2007, 09:57 PM
Dude that was a while ago, I even said he has lenses pages ago. You must really want to prove me wrong well congrats, you did it. So how long did you spend looking for evidence of that?
I have something called "memory." It allows me to recall information I've assimilated. In plain terms, it means I didn't spend any time "looking for evidence." I consulted my memory.
Rorschach II
09-03-2007, 10:00 PM
And even if he spent time looking for evidence, he would've been reading Batman comics, and that's time well spent!
Rorschach II
09-03-2007, 10:00 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v434/Anthropod/temp/Batlenses.jpg
Batman: The Ultimate Guide to the Dark Knight (http://www.amazon.com/Batman-Ultimate-Guide-Dark-Knight/dp/0756611210)
Lol, if we keep this up it'll begin to become a running gag to just bombard the guy with evidence of lenses once he's already admitted defeat!
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 10:01 PM
I have something called "memory." It allows me to recall information I've assimilated. In plain terms, it means I didn't spend any time "looking for evidence." I consulted my memory.
Oooh memory well that just there solves everything then. :whatever:
What's this about lenses again?
CaptainClown
09-03-2007, 10:05 PM
they are just laying the evidence down on me about lenses even though I said I was wrong. (shrug)
El Payaso
09-03-2007, 10:08 PM
Yeah, paint is fine. But for it to come off with his mask is just...dumb? But most of Batman Returns was, so yeah it wasn't a big deal.
Not by chance more stupěd than having a panda eyed Batman declaring his love to Catwoman.
But most of Batman Returns was, so yeah it wasn't a big deal.
How so?
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.