View Full Version : Is there really any "good" way to get rid a MJ
JesusOfNazarath
04-29-2006, 03:40 PM
Is there? Could they without totally getting rid of her? Why does Joe Q have a vendetta against her? I don't understand why good stories can't be writen with them together. I don't care if there together or not, but it just doesn't seem like theres any "good" way to break them up. I can see some crazed fan killing Kristen Dunst and blaming her for the brake up. lol:D Not really, but it would be funny.
Dyeathrose
04-29-2006, 04:30 PM
Is there? Could they without totally getting rid of her? Why does Joe Q have a vendetta against her? I don't understand why good stories can't be writen with them together. I don't care if there together or not, but it just doesn't seem like theres any "good" way to break them up. I can see some crazed fan killing Kristen Dunst and blaming her for the brake up. lol:D Not really, but it would be funny.
As far as I know, Joe Q blames MJ and the marriage for everything that's wrong with Spidey right now; they were married because Stan Lee wanted to marry them in the newspaper strips he does, so the comics followed suit before him, kind of like a race in development I suppose.
To get rid of her? Mm, that'd too tough to really sort though, as I don't see anything really wrong with the marriage per say, JQ says it ages Peter too much, and divorce or widowing makes him even older. To hypothetically "get rid of MJ", I'd suggest letting her go back to college to take another carreer of her liking, or even keeping her busy elsewhere in acting (it's acting now, right? I can't get supermodel of out my head). I doubt Marvel would take such a mundane route out, but it's all I can think of that still opens her to be around and return.
JesusOfNazarath
04-29-2006, 04:37 PM
I don't think a divorce would make him seem older. Chad Micheal Murry is 24 and has already been divorced. Its not that uncommon for young couples to divorce. They could just say they rushed into the mariage. That'd be a good way still be able to keep MJ in the Spidey world.
SpideyInATree
04-29-2006, 06:14 PM
I just don't like the Mary Jane character. I started reading the Spidey comics around 1990 to 1991. So, I started reading when they had been married in the comics for a while. It's just a relationship that I didn't enjoy. All she ever did was complain about how Peter was Spider-Man, etc. It got really annoying.
I even gave her a chance again once I got a hold of the Essential Spider-Man volumes. And her character, even written under classic Spidey writers, still bugged the crap out of me. She seemed more like a friend to Peter and that they only seemed to hook up because of Gwens death. While a neat little love story...just don't like the MJ character.
The only way I can see her going is death. How it happens? I don't know. Chameleon can come back for revenge against her for making him look like a doofus. Norman is too obvious. Maybe Roderick Kingsley can get his hands dirty. Either way I could see her getting the axe somehow. Especially if Peter goes public with his identity.
littleredhat
04-29-2006, 08:21 PM
No. As a whole she is just too popular. And in comics popularity is everything.
hulkamania85
04-29-2006, 10:43 PM
Have her sacrifice herself to save someone she sees on the street, so she becomes a hero like her husband before she dies.
Other than that they've already tried the separation thing, and any other death would seem like Gwen Stacy part 2.
JesusOfNazarath
04-29-2006, 11:09 PM
What if the real MJ went with Ben and they had a clone with Pete.....I like that.:D
Effect
04-30-2006, 12:23 AM
I honestly think the problem with MJ could be solved if they just dropped the whole actress/model aspect of the character and had her have a different career and simply stop drawing her as the prefect 10+ in the looks department. I think it's those aspects of her, that Peter is married to someone like that, that is causing the problem. If they want to keep the whole "everyman" aspect of Peter Parker/Spider-man those things about MJ have to go and change. It's constantly shattering that image. Him being friends with someone like that is one thing, he's friends with Felicia, but not married which is a hard to accept I think.
Short of doing that, then breaking the two of them up is the only think that will work if you don't want to kill her. Having her being replaced has already happen right? Doubt they want to do it again. Same for them being legally seperated right? So those options are out. What if Peter was the one that wanted the split and out of the marriage. How do you think readers would react to that?
Would that be acceptable?
SouLeSS
04-30-2006, 03:03 AM
Have Iron Man kill her to set an example.
3dman27
04-30-2006, 07:13 AM
The only way I can see her going is death. How it happens? I don't know. Chameleon can come back for revenge against her for making him look like a doofus.
doofus? as i recall mj justifiably KICKED HIS ASS for trying to force himself on her while disguised as pete she grabbed a broom and went "red sonja" on him [the older posters will understand this reference]
Won '08
04-30-2006, 08:11 AM
have read the latest wizard yall would notice that the Marvel House of Ideas has a very stern and gut wrenching plan for Spidey by the end of civil war. My assumption or my theory rather, is that Spids will indeed reveal his identity...at first...thinking it the correct thing to do...only to have the worst possible outcome affect him.
According to the writers..and I quote "By the end of all of this...there wont be a dry eye among any of our readers"...'it'll really be heart wrenching...emotionally devastating...and will change Spidey for years to come.'
Won '08
04-30-2006, 08:13 AM
doofus? as i recall mj justifiably KICKED HIS ASS for trying to force himself on her while disguised as pete she grabbed a broom and went "res sonja" on him [the older posters will understand this refference] Actually she had Pete's old Louisville. And they had a laugh about it afterwards.
And yeah, she did return to her Red Sonja "roots" didn't she?:up:
3dman27
04-30-2006, 10:22 AM
Actually she had Pete's old Louisville. And they had a laugh about it afterwards.
And yeah, she did return to her Red Sonja "roots" didn't she?:up:
she sure did
as for getting rid of mj if i HAD to i'd have her doing a fight scene in a "million dollar baby" or" angelfist"[about a womens martial arts tounament] movie and the stunt goes horribly wrong killing her in front of the movie crew and pete
the old parker luck kicks in later when the stuntwoman that killed mj is ruled not liable for prosecution:spidey:
ragingdemon155
04-30-2006, 11:16 AM
No, there isn't a good way to get "rid" of her character. First off. I don't even know why the heck that would want to get rid of her character. Spider-man has SO MANY problems going on right now with the writing. She isn't one of them. Joe Q is an idiot. He's trying hard to put the blame for sucky Spider titles on everything EXCEPT the actual problems that people are complaining about.
Themanofbat
04-30-2006, 11:42 AM
No... there's no "good" way.
She's one of the few original supporting cast members that made Spidey famous left. The Daily Bugle staff seems to be on a bit of a comeback, but everyone is practically dead and/or gone.
They can't just "kill" her off, because someone will simply ressurect her again later on. :rolleyes:
Now, it has been suggested that Spidey will become "unpopular" again as far as his hero status in the Marvel Universe due to his betrayal in Civil War. I can see where Pete will reveal his identity at the begining, thus compromising Mary Jane (and Aunt May for that matter), and when he switches sides, they then become targets. Peter will then be forced to abandon his family in some form or another, and things will probably dissisapate (sic) from that.
Just a hunch.... who knows what Marvel will do?
:(
onceasaint
04-30-2006, 03:30 PM
MJ just seems like one of those cemented characters in that universe. Which is very odd considering she's not a super-hero. Previous attempts to kill her or make her leave Peter's life havent been met by a very positive fan reaction. The best they could hope for is have her go back to school or jump back in to her career. Even with that kind of solution, it feels off. The party girl side to MJ was her way to deal with her life, so when shes really got Pete, someone who cares for her, she'd naturally start to grow up. Especially after what happened with Gwen. She's gotten a bit of that girl-next-door to her back where it seems more natural for her to be on the couch watching tv with Pete than out in Milan in a club.
The other part of it seems like the Clark/Lois relationship. Superman always saves Lois Lane, but a lot of people miss how Lois saves Superman. He tries very hard to fit in and not feel alienated, so Lois loving him and treating him like any other man (when is she really afraid to stand up to him?) is sort of saving him. It seems like the same dynamic to me with Pete and MJ. Sure, when it comes to goblins and lizards, he can save MJ from the monsters. But what about when Pete cant save somebody and/or loses them, who saves him? The writers lose that at times when they mischaracterize her. She should always be the first one to call Pete on his bs. I think she has to be written like that. Pete seems to be a very family oriented character, and if they ever "really" kill Aunt May, someone has to be his family. Theyre what anchors his character. Losing absolutely everything and everyone permanently (no retcons) would just take Spiderman to a place no one will like.
We've seen all the excessively grim and gritty stories of the 90s, its gotten old. A lot of people miss some of the feel of the older days of comics, but we also see how that can be very campy. There's gotta be a middleground to the writing. A character doesnt need its world shook every month, especially if the aftereffects never really stick. Happy endings to stories are nice, but they shouldnt come easily. Comic writers get a lot of pressure to write great stories, so its easy for them to try to stick to a formula or constantly stray from one using what they consider to be how the character acts/reacts. Im sure another writer will come along eventually that will care a lot about the book and make fans happy (for a while at least).
Eye Doc
05-01-2006, 03:10 PM
While I don't want to see a divorce or MJ's death, I don't think either automatically ages Peter to the point where readers can no longer relate to him.
I had a visitor in my office last week who is going thru a divorce and she's is about 23-24. I former classmate of became a widow while we were still in our 20's. People can undergo tragedy at a young age, mature from it, and still not be considered "old".
I can't see either character just up and asking for a divorce, especially after all they've been thru. Yet, scenarios could be created that could cause Pete or MJ to leave the marriage if one of them thought it was in the best interest of the other party. The hard part for the writer helming such a story would be coming up with a believeable scenario where that would/could happen.
Eye Doc
SpideyInATree
05-05-2006, 09:56 AM
doofus? as i recall mj justifiably KICKED HIS ASS for trying to force himself on her while disguised as pete she grabbed a broom and went "red sonja" on him [the older posters will understand this reference]
Yeah. That's what I was talking about. I mean...the guy is The Chameleon. The first Spidey villain! And Spider-Man's wife kicked his ass. So, yes, she made him look like a doofus by beating him down.
And he's waiting in the wings to extract his vengeance.
Remember...there was that one story where Chameleon said he loved Spider-Man. Maybe he'll off MJ because she's taking all of Spider-Man's love. :o
The Joker
05-05-2006, 12:08 PM
Yeah. That's what I was talking about. I mean...the guy is The Chameleon. The first Spidey villain! And Spider-Man's wife kicked his ass. So, yes, she made him look like a doofus by beating him down.
And he's waiting in the wings to extract his vengeance.
isnt he...ya know...dead?
SpideyInATree
05-05-2006, 12:36 PM
I'm only speculating that he's alive because he appeared in Millar's Marvel Knights run.
littleredhat
05-05-2006, 03:12 PM
Okay I just thought of a good way to "end" the marriage.
Say Spidey's ID is revealed during Civil War. Peter asks MJ and Aunt May do some acting.
They pretend that they never knew that Peter was living a double life(they both have experience at it) and prevent themselveves from being persacuted. MJ files for an anullment on the grounds of fraud to make it convincing.Thus making it so that leagaly the marriage never happened
Meanwhile Pete's hiding out on the lamb,stealing one of Tony's Holo-inducers Pete takes on a number of different identites while assisting captain america's avengers and contiuing as spider-man.
All this leads to a get-back-together story that will allow for the entire relationship to be made stronger than ever.
Lt. Figgnuts
05-05-2006, 03:36 PM
That might work, but I think most fans would be upset that Peter was "on the lamb," so to speak - not actually being Peter Parker, but pretending to be someone new each day, issue, story arc, whatever. I just don't see it going over to well with the fans. The fans want Peter as Peter, and they want him written well. That's all they really want. You can have that and Mary Jane.
I don't think there's a good way to get rid of MJ. Maybe the marriage was a good idea, maybe it's not. They made their figurative bed with the marriage, now they should lie in it. Deconstructing and retconning should be a last resort. If they divorce, they'll just get back together when the next EIC who loved the relationship comes along. If she dies, someone will just bring her back to life or say she never really died at all. There's no use in getting rid of her at this point, she's sort of a staple. The man on the street - especially now with the movies and everything - sees Mary Jane as Peter Parker's girlfriend. That's just the way it is.
Keep her, I say.
3dman27
05-05-2006, 04:05 PM
Okay I just thought of a good way to "end" the marriage.
Say Spidey's ID is revealed during Civil War. Peter asks MJ and Aunt May do some acting.
They pretend that they never knew that Peter was living a double life(they both have experience at it) and prevent themselveves from being persacuted. MJ files for an anullment on the grounds of fraud to make it convincing.Thus making it so that leagaly the marriage never happened
Meanwhile Pete's hiding out on the lamb,stealing one of Tony's Holo-inducers Pete takes on a number of different identites while assisting captain america's avengers and contiuing as spider-man.
All this leads to a get-back-together story that will allow for the entire relationship to be made stronger than ever.
that might work but where does fraud come in?
Lt. Figgnuts
05-05-2006, 04:07 PM
that might work but where does fraud come in?
Well, if Aunt May and MJ pretend that they never knew that Peter was Spider-Man...
...MJ can theoretically have the marriage annulled on the grounds of fraud, saying that Peter married her under false pretenses; that the assumption was that he was just a regular Joe.
It works in theory.
Dragon
05-05-2006, 04:44 PM
Okay I just thought of a good way to "end" the marriage.
Say Spidey's ID is revealed during Civil War. Peter asks MJ and Aunt May do some acting.
They pretend that they never knew that Peter was living a double life(they both have experience at it) and prevent themselveves from being persacuted. MJ files for an anullment on the grounds of fraud to make it convincing.Thus making it so that leagaly the marriage never happened
Meanwhile Pete's hiding out on the lamb,stealing one of Tony's Holo-inducers Pete takes on a number of different identites while assisting captain america's avengers and contiuing as spider-man.
All this leads to a get-back-together story that will allow for the entire relationship to be made stronger than ever.
It wouldn't matter if MJ got a divorce from Peter. Any of Peter's enemies would still know that they could hurt him by hurting her. Whether they're married or not, Peter still cares about her.
But i highly disagree with the consensus that the book has to feature MJ to survive. Some the best comics in Spidey's run either didn't involve her, or she didn't play any pivotal role in.
The Joker
05-06-2006, 03:03 AM
first, they shouldnt get rid of MJ...second, if they do, some third string villain should kill her...like, Shocker...
JesusOfNazarath
05-06-2006, 03:07 AM
MJ killed by a Shocker.LOL
3dman27
05-06-2006, 06:29 AM
ormaybe killed while fighting off a mugger or an attacker during the civil war mistakeing her for an unregistered mutant or super
The Shadow
05-06-2006, 11:14 AM
have read the latest wizard yall would notice that the Marvel House of Ideas has a very stern and gut wrenching plan for Spidey by the end of civil war. My assumption or my theory rather, is that Spids will indeed reveal his identity...at first...thinking it the correct thing to do...only to have the worst possible outcome affect him.
According to the writers..and I quote "By the end of all of this...there wont be a dry eye among any of our readers"...'it'll really be heart wrenching...emotionally devastating...and will change Spidey for years to come.'
Oh, yeah.....That's just frigg'n wonderful. More changes on top of the other changes they've already made like Gwen, the suit, origin and powers that no one can stand.
They've almost built themselves a whole new character using Peter's name and history. Might as well have kept the clone or really killed him and replaced him with someone new. No, Peter is Spider-Man. Well, this is THEIR Spider-Man not MINE.
I made this suggestion in the other thread and for the most part I think it could work if their so He11 bent on making Peter single again. I'd prefer them not killing her off because of the more than likely chance some hack will bring her back. Here's what I suggested as solution #2.
Here's another "idea" I had that wouldn't involve anything really that would warp continuity and might get things back to where the majority of us would be happy.
Peter is outed during the Civil War by another hero who knows who he is. Mj and May become targets right away for every villain he's ever faced. In an attack Mj is seriously injured or posioned (take your pick) while trying to save May. Mj is either put into suspended animation (like Betty Ross in the Hulk book) OR ends up in a deep coma. Peter and Mj never split up. Peter however is now "single" after an acceptable period of grieving. Mj is not dead and she does go "out" a hero.
Peter learns after the Civil War that the changes he's gone through are a curse. Some new villain behind Morlun and all of the "totem" stuff appears. The situation is finally resolved with the help of Dr. Strange. Peter appears to loose his powers. Through a series of events that unfolds Peter uses this to prove that he was never Spider-Man and that he was set-up to try and protect May and his friends. Another hero helps Peter out by appearing in public as Spider-Man. During or shortly after this Peter's original powers come back because of the curse being "lifted". The original origin of his powers turns out to be true after all. Peter even looses the "organic shooters" and goes back to the old mech. shooters. Because of being outed as Spidey during the Civil War Peter looses his job as a teacher. Ironically after all is said and done Jonah, feeling guilty for how he treated Peter during the Civil War, gives Peter a job at the Bugle as senior photographer.
Now I've also thought that maybe instead of the "coma" thing MJ could still get hurt but develop Amnesia and wouldn't remember Peter or them being married. I know "technically" that would lead probably to a "divorce" of sorts but it still doesn't take away the fact that they did love each other. I mean it wouldn't be like they both of all of a sudden just decided to say the heck with it because we know they've been through so much all ready that they wouldn't leave each other unless something this major happens.
Mj would just eventually develop a whole new personality and life for herself. May and Peter would be the only ones besides some other heroes that Peter was Spidey. Peter would still love Mj but he would realize it's probably for the best that she doesn't remember anything.
Dragon
05-06-2006, 01:38 PM
Here's what Joe Q recently said about the marriage at Newsarama http://www.newsarama.com/JoeFridays/JoeFridays49.html . It's totally self-contradictory. Which means, he basically doesn't know what to do:
Joe Quesada: Hang on, before we get started on Civil War, I wanted to address something from last week with respect to the whole Spider marriage.
First, a poster by the name of “ThatTalkingGuy” made what I thought was a very good point. He really encapsulated the whole marriage for me.
“What made the Marvel Universe was a bunch of cool, new heroes that had flaws and spoke to people. Spider-Man's flaw wasn't that he was married to a supermodel. And Reed and Sue can get married because Reed and Sue were together since the beginning. They were always a couple, adding a ring doesn't change anything because they are the same. And the kids don't grow. Nor should they ever.
“Peter Parker never was a family man. It perverts the character to make him so. Peter Parker being young and having girl trouble, school problems, work problems, and feeling guilty about the death of his father figure and constantly lying and not being there for his mother figure is relatable. Peter Parker being old, married, with money problems and whining about his luck is pathetic. And Peter Parker being old, married, and content is boring.
“And I think it is kind of funny people are complaining about the status quo. The marriage is the very DEFINITION of the status quo. You can't get rid of the damn thing. It just sits there, adding literally NOTHING to the stories. If anyone can tell me ONE good story that requires Peter and MJ to be married instead of living together or engaged, go ahead. If you can tell me that Spider-Man would have survived if he had married Betty Brant in the early issues of Spider-Man, go ahead”
Well said.
Let me add a few things to this. At the core of the FF, what makes them unique as a superhero team is that they’re a family. That is what lies at the heart of their construction. Now, while it’s nice to see things go well for Peter from time to time, don’t be under any delusion, we write good things into his life only to eventually take them away because that is what makes his stories work. It’s by taking those things away and watching him triumph and do the right thing regardless that really make his character special. Make his life comfortable PERMANANTLY and you hurt the character. The marriage to MJ is a permanent good thing that we added to Peter’s canon. It would be like having Peter win the lottery and not having the ABILITY to have him lose it all.
Here’s a very simplistic off the top of my head idea of how the wedding could have gone down while keeping in character to what Spider-Man stories should be. So Peter and MJ are engaged to be married, everything’s going perfectly for Pete and he’s anxiously awaiting to get married but MJ stands him up at the alter. We think it’s just cold feet or just plain old cruelness on her part and then we find out that one of Spidey’s villains captured her. As MJ’s at death’s door Spidey comes and rescues her and comes to the conclusion that his life is just way too dangerous so he has to let the girl go and break, not only the wedding off, but the relationship. Now, not only is this in keeping to the character of Spidey, it sets us up for Peter and MJ to find each other once again.
Also, Just for the record, because people seemed concerned, killing Mary Jane is not an option, zero zilch, that is one of the reasons why this whole marriage thing is such a tough thing to ever even imagine changing. Let me try to clearly explain what I mean.
First, lets talk about why I feel a youthful Peter Parker is something that was so important. Sure, some people here may say I like Peter married, just write him young and all will be okay. Let me ask you all this, do you remember when you were young, I mean 8, 10 years of age, maybe even 12 or 14. To me when I was that age, it didn’t matter if the person was 21 or 61, a married person always seemed very adult and older to me. It was something that big people did and then they became mommies and daddies. You have to put yourself back in that mind set to understand where I’m coming from.
So, let’s get ourselves in a younger frame of mind for this.
If the goal were to have a more “youthful feeling” Peter Parker, killing MJ is not an option. First of all, she is a major player in the Spider-Man Universe of Aunt May caliber. I will argue until I’m blue in the face that too many of the original cast members were killed off over the years to the point were so much was lost from the world of Spider-Man.
Please don’t get me started on killing Harry, that was just plain dumb. But also, killing MJ would only serve to make Peter feel older and matters worse. Now he’s a widower. Put yourself in that youthful mind set folks, think about it.
While we’re at it, divorce isn’t an option either. Look at it from my perspective, back in the day one of the things that I made clear to my writers who were going to work on Spider-Man was to please for the love of god, let’s show them as a happy loving couple. I wanted to have a title that showed how a strong loving couple could work things out like having Spider powers and just life in general.
In all frankness, it’s been really nice to see. So, divorcing them to me sends out completely the wrong message. Imagine you’re a mom and you’re buying little Bobby or little Betty Spidey Adventures or maybe Spidey Loves MJ and you’re watching the news one day and the broadcaster looks right at you and says, “Spider-Man is getting divorced, more on that after these messages.” Let’s just say that as a parent, I’d be upset by the sound bite, I could only imagine how the rest of the world would feel. And, once again, divorcing Peter would only serve to make him feel older.
And then there’s all the great stories that get inhibited by the marriage. But if you still want to argue about it, let me give you the single simplest and most compelling reason I can give you. Knowing that having a child or getting divorce, annulled, separated, or widowed and all those sorts of things aren’t an option, there is not a single story of a married Peter Parker that can’t be told with a single Peter Parker. On the other hand, the exact opposite isn’t true.
So, these are the obstacles that I look at ever day. Sure there are other ways to go back in time and start all over again, but then you basically tell people that the stories they’ve been reading since the wedding don’t count, not a good thing to do.
Now, I noticed that some folks were saying that they got into Spidey when he was married and it’s been cool with them and they enjoy it. So, to that I would argue that Marvel almost made a huge mistake years ago and Peter and MJ almost ended up with child. Imagine if this had come to fruition in the pages of the regular Universe. Now imagine me years later telling folks that giving Peter and MJ a child was a terrible mistake because it makes him seem even older and completely separated from what was at the core of making the character great. I would have folks telling me that I was wrong, that the kid was a good thing for Spider-Man to have as part of the canon.
So, I would argue that the marriage is exactly the same thing. You have to keep things in perspective; we tend to forget so easily. When Stan and company created the Marvel Universe; they aged Peter very quickly, in real time. But no one then knew that this was still all going to be around 40 plus years later. Back then the prevailing thought was that maybe they’d get four or five years out of a character, max. Somewhere along the line they realized they had to put on the breaks because if they kept going in the manner that they were going, well you can figure it out for yourself.
Okay, I’m done [laughs]
Joker
05-06-2006, 01:58 PM
"Peter Parker never was a family man. It perverts the character to make him so. Peter Parker being young and having girl trouble, school problems, work problems, and feeling guilty about the death of his father figure and constantly lying and not being there for his mother figure is relatable. Peter Parker being old, married, with money problems and whining about his luck is pathetic. And Peter Parker being old, married, and content is boring."
Peter Parker can't be all the things he was in Stan Lee's days forever.The character has to mature in some respects.How long could he have school problems or money problems,especially the kind of money problems he had when his only job was being freelance for the Bugle.
Geez if Joe Q had his way,Spidey would be stuck in that same time frame forever.He'd never progress as a character.
And since when has he stopped feeling guilty about Uncle Ben's death??
"Please don’t get me started on killing Harry, that was just plain dumb"
LOL! The guy who gave Sins Past and the Other the green light is dissing one of the greatest deaths in Spidey's history :rolleyes:
If Joe Q had a brain cell it would die of lonliness.
LobokDaikon
05-06-2006, 02:16 PM
They should change the titles of the comics then. Amazing can be The Pathetic Spider-Man and Sensational can be The Boring Spider-Man.
regalredstar
05-06-2006, 04:06 PM
Have her give up the acting and make her like the MJ from spider-girl would probably be a good idea for the rest of spidey world
~ооз
Citizen_Kaine
05-06-2006, 04:27 PM
So Joey Q has gone on a recent tirade about the Spider Marriage, because, he's trying to soften us up for whats going to happen real soon in Civil War?
Mr Quesada let me reiterate, If MJ dies or Peter loses the Mask. The Spider comics will be ****ed, you'll be ****ed, and your company will be ****ed. If this indeed happens this portion of the hype will become a No Man's Land because every thread will be about one of those two topics
stillanerd
05-06-2006, 04:45 PM
So Joey Q has gone on a recent tirade about the Spider Marriage, because, he's trying to soften us up for whats going to happen real soon in Civil War?
Mr Quesada let me reiterate, If MJ dies or Peter loses the Mask. The Spider comics will be ****ed, you'll be ****ed, and your company will be ****ed. If this indeed happens this portion of the hype will become a No Man's Land because every thread will be about one of those two topics
Well, to his credit, Joe Q say that making Peter a widower would be worse, but I sure wouldn't put it past him to have Spidey unmask during Civil War.
Interestingly enough, his "story idea" for how Peter and MJ could not have married not only sounds like what Tom DeFlaco originally wanted, but does seem too complete to be just a random idea (although he does say "time travel" would create additional problems by saying certain stories wouldn't count). Also, it should be noted that (despite implying months earlier that he only had one "last genie" to put back in the bottle) he talks about "three wishes."
Genies usually give you three wishes, I’ve had three wishes for the Marvel Universe for a very long time. House of M covered one of them, Civil War will cover the second. (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/Genies%20usually%20give%20you%20three%20wishes,%20 I%E2%80%99ve%20had%20three%20wishes%20for%20the%20 Marvel%20Universe%20for%20a%20very%20long%20time.% 20House%20of%20M%20covered%20one%20of%20them,%20Ci vil%20War%20will%20cover%20the%20second.)
Perhaps it wouldn't be much of a wild guess to wonder what the "third" wish is.
EDIT: Also, the idea that Spidey being married makes his life comfortable is ridiculous when you consider that it takes lot of hard work on both spouses part to keep a marriage together.
LobokDaikon
05-06-2006, 05:13 PM
Interestingly enough, his "story idea" for how Peter and MJ could not have married not only sounds like what Tom DeFlaco originally wanted, but does seem too complete to be just a random idea
There are problems with that idea anyway. He breaks up with MJ because his life is too dangerous, ok. But then shouldn't he have to avoid all women after that, at least until he's done being Spider-Man? Peter ends up with absolutely no romance, which is worse than the marriage, or he just ends up as a hypocrite or a moron for going back on his decision.
Dragon
05-06-2006, 07:45 PM
Peter changing his mind about marrying MJ is silly from the end of, since Gwen died, if Peter was of that mind set, he'd never have proposed to MJ in the first place. Not to mention that the villain kidnapping MJ is about as cliche' as anything one could conceive.
Also, Joe makes it clear that Peter should be romantically involved with MJ, so them not being married changes nothing. That's what I mean in that his ideas are completely self-contradictory.
LarryLegend
05-06-2006, 07:48 PM
Well, to his credit, Joe Q say that making Peter a widower would be worse, but I sure wouldn't put it past him to have Spidey unmask during Civil War.
Interestingly enough, his "story idea" for how Peter and MJ could not have married not only sounds like what Tom DeFlaco originally wanted, but does seem too complete to be just a random idea (although he does say "time travel" would create additional problems by saying certain stories wouldn't count). Also, it should be noted that (despite implying months earlier that he only had one "last genie" to put back in the bottle) he talks about "three wishes."
Perhaps it wouldn't be much of a wild guess to wonder what the "third" wish is.
EDIT: Also, the idea that Spidey being married makes his life comfortable is ridiculous when you consider that it takes lot of hard work on both spouses part to keep a marriage together.
What the hell were these three wishes? Ways to get away with ****ty stories?
TheVileOne
05-06-2006, 11:34 PM
Are they going to break up the marriage then? Why didn't they just do it during Amazing Spider-man #500?
Dragon
05-06-2006, 11:51 PM
Let's be clear: Joe Q is a moron.
First off to assume that only "Old" people are married etc is absurd, since people are getting married regularly in their early 20's. Kids don't associate Marriage, divorce, or being a widower with any specific age range. And let's not get statred about kids. I doubt at this point in history that teens don't know of at least one other teen that's had children.
Secondly- since when is Marvel directing their comics to 12-14 year olds? Was it before or after Peter's eye got ripped out and eaten? Was it before or after he ate Morlun's head? Before or after he tore through his own skin?
Joe Q is either really, really stupid, or he's just making up BS excuses for wanting the marriage ended.
JesusOfNazarath
05-06-2006, 11:56 PM
Pretty soon he's just going to say well I'm in charge and so I want it my way.LOL Like when he said my design my colors about the iron spidey suit.
The Infernal
05-07-2006, 04:08 AM
Let's be clear: Joe Q is a moron.
First off to assume that only "Old" people are married etc is absurd, since people are getting married regularly in their early 20's. Kids don't associate Marriage, divorce, or being a widower with any specific age range. And let's not get statred about kids. I doubt at this point in history that teens don't know of at least one other teen that's had children.
Secondly- since when is Marvel directing their comics to 12-14 year olds? Was it before or after Peter's eye got ripped out and eaten? Was it before or after he ate Morlun's head? Before or after he tore through his own skin?
Joe Q is either really, really stupid, or he's just making up BS excuses for wanting the marriage ended.
I agree, Joe Q is an idiot. None of his arguments really make sense. I'm sure most people who have read his interview on the subject can see that. They just seem to be a long list of weak and vain excuses to validate what he wants to do and gloss over the mistakes he's made. There doesn't seem to be a single statement that holds enough truth for it not to be argued with.
3dman27
05-07-2006, 06:47 AM
I agree, Joe Q is an idiot. None of his arguments really make sense. I'm sure most people who have read his interview on the subject can see that. They just seem to be a long list of weak and vain excuses to validate what he wants to do and gloss over the mistakes he's made. There doesn't seem to be a single statement that holds enough truth for it not to be argued with.
he needs to be pink slipped asap
The Infernal
05-07-2006, 01:41 PM
he needs to be pink slipped asap
Perhaps when Marvel sets up its own Message boards we can see who is the first set up a 'Joe Q is an idiot' thread. I'm sure it will be a hot topic.
owenstar
05-07-2006, 02:58 PM
Doesnt spiderman have enough titles to flesh out multiple aspects and time frames of the character?
Seriously, MJ is a huge part of the character....Joe Q needs to not live in the past...Characters need some change over 50 years...while the grass in the past may look greener, sometimes it really isnt...
Its terrible when the people on top think they know everything and how the fan really feels...take a look in this thread...
I dont read many "hero" comics for the simple fact of all the lame-o gimmics that they use....people need to stay dead...some people need to never die...dont treat your readers like idiots
3dman27
05-07-2006, 03:05 PM
I dont read many "hero" comics for the simple fact of all the lame-o gimmics that they use....people need to stay dead...some people need to never die...dont treat your readers like idiots
i'm afraid thats what mr quesada is doing though
Venom Drool
05-07-2006, 03:53 PM
Eddie Brock should kill her.. awesome :o
Kool-Aid
05-07-2006, 04:36 PM
Perhaps when Marvel sets up its own Message boards we can see who is the first set up a 'Joe Q is an idiot' thread. I'm sure it will be a hot topic.
Most likely it'll be deleted and the person will be banned. Thats what happend to me on newsarama cuz they're Marvel's slut.:mad:
The Infernal
05-07-2006, 05:00 PM
Most likely it'll be deleted and the person will be banned. Thats what happend to me on newsarama cuz they're Marvel's slut.:mad:
That's a shame. Sorry to hear that dude. Though I would hope that when Marvel set theirs up that they allow complaints.
Though failing that I would make a thread here and maybe on other forums encouraging members to sign up there and start similar threads. Then hopefully we would have enough people there for the threads to be taken seriously.
stillanerd
05-07-2006, 05:12 PM
Peter changing his mind about marrying MJ is silly from the end of, since Gwen died, if Peter was of that mind set, he'd never have proposed to MJ in the first place. Not to mention that the villain kidnapping MJ is about as cliche' as anything one could conceive.
Also, Joe makes it clear that Peter should be romantically involved with MJ, so them not being married changes nothing. That's what I mean in that his ideas are completely self-contradictory.
Very good points, as always, Dragon. The more I read Joe Q's comments, the more I think that he just wants an excuse for Peter to start dating all kinds of women like he did during the late 70s/early 80s which I contend is very wrong for the character and how every one of those potential love interests he went through are barely memorable--except for the Black Cat, and even THAT was just a rip-off of the Batman/Catwoman relationship. If Joe Q even contends that MJ is the right girl for Peter, then what's the point in having them date other people just to prove this? It's already been proven.
First off to assume that only "Old" people are married etc is absurd, since people are getting married regularly in their early 20's. Kids don't associate Marriage, divorce, or being a widower with any specific age range. And let's not get statred about kids. I doubt at this point in history that teens don't know of at least one other teen that's had children.
Secondly- since when is Marvel directing their comics to 12-14 year olds? Was it before or after Peter's eye got ripped out and eaten? Was it before or after he ate Morlun's head? Before or after he tore through his own skin?
Joe Q is either really, really stupid, or he's just making up BS excuses for wanting the marriage ended.
Right on, again. If he's so interested in attracting the 9-year olds back, then he'd really ought to start on the CONTENT of the stories themselves, especially since their new rating system--like most rating systems--are pretty much worthless anyway. Also, as I stated earlier, his comment that marriage makes Peter's life more "comfortable" is ridiculous when you consider how much hard work is put into marriages to make it work, much less all the marriage counsellors and the self-help book market to help such couples work out their problems--and considering the divorce rate, there is a risk of failure.
I agree, Joe Q is an idiot. None of his arguments really make sense. I'm sure most people who have read his interview on the subject can see that. They just seem to be a long list of weak and vain excuses to validate what he wants to do and gloss over the mistakes he's made. There doesn't seem to be a single statement that holds enough truth for it not to be argued with.
It all comes down to simple nostalgia, in that these creators believe they can recapture and at the same time write "better" stories than Stan Lee's run on Spider-Man. Plus the fact that most comic book creators really don't like continuity.
UK_Stu
05-08-2006, 08:07 AM
Very good points, as always, Dragon. The more I read Joe Q's comments, the more I think that he just wants an excuse for Peter to start dating all kinds of women like he did during the late 70s/early 80s which I contend is very wrong for the character and how every one of those potential love interests he went through are barely memorable--except for the Black Cat, and even THAT was just a rip-off of the Batman/Catwoman relationship. If Joe Q even contends that MJ is the right girl for Peter, then what's the point in having them date other people just to prove this? It's already been proven.
Right on, again. If he's so interested in attracting the 9-year olds back, then he'd really ought to start on the CONTENT of the stories themselves, especially since their new rating system--like most rating systems--are pretty much worthless anyway. Also, as I stated earlier, his comment that marriage makes Peter's life more "comfortable" is ridiculous when you consider how much hard work is put into marriages to make it work, much less all the marriage counsellors and the self-help book market to help such couples work out their problems--and considering the divorce rate, there is a risk of failure.
It all comes down to simple nostalgia, in that these creators believe they can recapture and at the same time write "better" stories than Stan Lee's run on Spider-Man. Plus the fact that most comic book creators really don't like continuity.
Excellent points here.
My major issues with Joe Q's statements are the fact that he seems to think that an older spider-man is of no interest to younger readers. Maybe I was in the minority when I was a kid but I always prefered my heroes as adults and didn't like the teen heroes or side kicks as much. I wanted someone to aspire to not relate too, which is why I was quite happy to see Pete at college and getting a job when I was a kid. As long as Spidey has exciting adventures, kids will love him, whether he's married or not.
Dragon
05-08-2006, 08:40 AM
Also when you consider that one of the most popular heroes for children is Wolverine, who is about as far from a teenager as one can get, it's clear that the age thing isn't of any consequence to kids.
As stillanerd said, If kids are not buying the comics, its because of the content, the cost and the availability. Not because Spider-Man appears to be too old for them to relate to.
As for marriage making Peter's life comfortable- When was that? When has his life been comfortable EVER? Just because he has someone to go home to doesn't make his life easy in anyway.
ragingdemon155
05-08-2006, 12:01 PM
Also when you consider that one of the most popular heroes for children is Wolverine, who is about as far from a teenager as one can get, it's clear that the age thing isn't of any consequence to kids.
As stillanerd said, If kids are not buying the comics, its because of the content, the cost and the availability. Not because Spider-Man appears to be too old for them to relate to.
As for marriage making Peter's life comfortable- When was that? When has his life been comfortable EVER? Just because he has someone to go home to doesn't make his life easy in anyway.
:up: Great post.
Also, I never seen kids in comic stores anyway. Seriously, kids don't read anymore anyway let alone comics. I'm curious as to what imaginery children Joe Q is talking about reading his comics?
Maybe at one point "Kids" were the ones picking up comics but it hasn't been that way for a LONG time now and that isn't about to change.
SpideyInATree
05-12-2006, 08:47 AM
LOL! The guy who gave Sins Past and the Other the green light is dissing one of the greatest deaths in Spidey's history :rolleyes:
Yeah, that's a little out there. Spec. Spider-Man # 200 was, and still is, a fantastic Spider-Man issue and story. Please...oh please...lets not ruin THAT one too! :eek:
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.