Do you want the Fourth Spider-Man movie to be a Sequel or a Reboot?

[boywonder13]

So what do you want....? A Sequel to the Raimi Spider-Man movies or a reboot of the whole franchise., possibly closer to the comics???

What do you want?? :spidey: :up:

[nolan's roll'n]

I want a sequel.

[boywonder13]

I haven't made my decision I like Raimi's Spider-Man movies but 3 movies is enough for me of the same thing.

I don't want the movies to detiorate in quality becuase cast memebers might not be able to come back and Raimi might not direct.

I wouldn't mind a new Spider-Man Saga coming to the cinemas in 2010 or 11 or some time after.

But I would love for the current movies to continue because there are so many villains and story lines that could be added to make this a huge Spider-Man saga of movies.

I don't know.

[Majik1387]

I say sequel. It doesn't need a reboot.

[boywonder13]

I say sequel. It doesn't need a reboot.

I would love a sequel 2 but not if the quality of the movies g down.

Comic Book Movie fan now how fast "Good milk can get sour" in a franchise.

[TheFlyinRussian]

As long as you get the cast back it will be fine.

[boywonder13]

But the chances of having the cast back isnt that high though it wont be a problem they will justneed tobey and dunst cuz alot of charracters are knocked of in Spider-Man 3.

[weezerspider]

I think it's way to early to reboot it. Plus, at the moment it doesn't need a rebooting.

[TheFlyinRussian]

But the chances of having the cast back isnt that high though it wont be a problem they will justneed tobey and dunst cuz alot of charracters are knocked of in Spider-Man 3.
Cliff Robertson(Uncle Ben), Rosemary Harris(Aunt May), The guy who plays Connors(Dylan Baker, right?), JJJ and JJ, I haven't seen any of these actors in recent films, so it won't be hard to bring them back. Sony can afford to throw some cash at Tobey, Kirsten, and Raimi.

[Venom 1988]

Sequel

[weezerspider]

Cliff Robertson(Uncle Ben), Rosemary Harris(Aunt May), The guy who plays Connors(Dylan Baker, right?), JJJ and JJ, I haven't seen any of these actors in recent films, so it won't be hard to bring them back. Sony can afford to throw some cash at Tobey, Kirsten, and Raimi.

Thats a good point.

[lordofthenerds]

Sequel. No need for a reboot this early.

[TheFlyinRussian]

It's unanimous. The poll's 11-0 in favour of sequel. If they absolutely HAD to re-cast then **** the sequel, just reboot.

[CConn]

What do we mean by reboot? While I'd be perfectly fine with a different direction and cast for Spider-Man, we really don't need to see the origin, or anything like that again...or at least, any time soon.

[Mr. Socko]

We don't need a reboot because the franchise is going great. A sequel. If Raimi returns then the same cast should return aswell. But if we get a new director then I'm also for a new cast.

[Gladiator]

A sequel. You don't reboot something as successful as Spider-Man. I think everyone will return for the 4th movie except for Dunst, which is a good thing imo.

[ru8up75]

sequel without a doubt.

[blind_fury]

Reboot.

By the time Spider-man 4 is released Toby Maguire will be 34 years old. And we've seen Sam Raimi's version of Spider-man. It's time to see what someone else has to offer.

[boywonder13]

Reboot.

By the time Spider-man 4 is released Toby Maguire will be 34 years old. And we've seen Sam Raimi's version of Spider-man. It's time to see what someone else has to offer.

Preach it Blind Fury........!!!:) :up: :spidey:

[Katsuro]

Reboot.

By the time Spider-man 4 is released Toby Maguire will be 34 years old. And we've seen Sam Raimi's version of Spider-man. It's time to see what someone else has to offer.

But will anybody's version really be that different that we'll need to see the origin story done all over again?

I swear, ever since Batman Begins, people seem to just want to reboot everything. The Spider-Man movies have been very succesful, and although there were minor changes, there weren't enough to warrant completely redoing it. Another Spider-Man origin film would be boring as hell (whereas with Batman, we never got an origin).

Let's have a sequel. Let's move forward with these movies, not backwards. And if they cant do a sequel, then just... stop.

[boywonder13]

But will anybody's version really be that different that we'll need to see the origin story done all over again?

I swear, ever since Batman Begins, people seem to just want to reboot everything. The Spider-Man movies have been very succesful, and although there were minor changes, there weren't enough to warrant completely redoing it. Another Spider-Man origin film would be boring as hell (whereas with Batman, we never got an origin).

Let's have a sequel. Let's move forward with these movies, not backwards. And if they cant do a sequel, then just... stop.

Reboot's dont have to be sequels they could have made Superman Lives or something and it would be a reboot though it has nothing to do with its oriign.

New Universe is part of a reboot. The first film doesnt have to focus on origin maybe in 10 15 minutes.

It makes it so what happened in the past films,didnt happen giving the filmmakes more freedom.....

By reboot we mean rebooting the universe of the psidey movies, not just an origin film....

[Remy LeBeau X3]

No need for a reboot. Spider-Man is going pretty good. I think they could probably make two more movies before having to find another Spider-Man. If not, they could always cryogenically freeze Tobey.

[TheFlyinRussian]

Reboot.

By the time Spider-man 4 is released Toby Maguire will be 34 years old. And we've seen Sam Raimi's version of Spider-man. It's time to see what someone else has to offer.
Tobey's not aging bad. Just put some make-up on him and he could still look like he's in his 20's for the 5th. Sam Raimi's version of Spider-Man is the best version we could've hoped for. No other director would have done as good a job Raimi has done. Anyone else wouldn't have focused enough on Peter Parker, they would just had tons of flash with no substance. Yeah we've seen Raimi's version, and since it's spectacular, let's continue seeing it.

["Iron Man"]

There will probably be a reboot eventually, but for now lets get to Spider-Man 6, and then 20 years after that, reboot it....maybe.

[TheFlyinRussian]

Yeah I want 6 too, but it would definitely not be easy.

[boywonder13]

No other director would have done as good a job Raimi has done. Anyone else wouldn't have focused enough on Peter Parker, they would just had tons of flash with no substance. Yeah we've seen Raimi's version, and since it's spectacular, let's continue seeing it.

Without a reboot i gues we won't know for some time.......

He'smade the only real spider-man movies, we cant compare it to soemthing else, forall we know the next guy could make a much better Spider-Man movie.

[Shadow_Knight]

Sequel with out a dought.

[TheFlyinRussian]

Raimi cares about the quality of the movies because he cares about the character. That's why I think no other director could top him. Does anyone have suggestions for directors that would do a good job if they had to reboot?

[Symbiote Hulk]

Why the ***** should they reboot it?

[Style 92]

Sequal no need for a reboot yet, even if Raimi has made some mistakes.

[GoldGoblin]

Sequel

[Weir]

http://www.geocities.com/starwarsepisode7/spiderman4.jpg

I want them to do this for Spider-man 4.

Against the threat of nuclear war...is Spider-man!

Spider-man takes on the nuclear arms race, by trying to rid the world of all nuclear weapons.

[Kal-El 8]

I wanted Spidey 4 to be a sequel only if Raimi & The whole Gang return . Otherwise don't make anymore spider-man movies .

[NinjaTurtleFan]

So what do you want....? A Sequel to the Raimi Spider-Man movies or a reboot of the whole franchise., possibly closer to the comics???

What do you want?? :spidey: :up:

Sequel. Reboots are only done when movies suck henceforth the last "Batman" sequels and "Superman" sequels, but with "Batman Begins" and "Superman Returns" they've redeemed themselves.

"Hulk" Marvel is going to redeem themselves with, but "Spider-Man" is their biggest grossing franchise ever, it'll go on for years.

[weezerspider]

Sequel. Reboots are only done when movies suck henceforth the last "Batman" sequels and "Superman" sequels, but with "Batman Begins" and "Superman Returns" they've redeemed themselves.

"Hulk" Marvel is going to redeem themselves with, but "Spider-Man" is their biggest grossing franchise ever, it'll go on for years.

yeah, thats extremely true. When Spidey goes down the drain, then we will talk about a reboot.

[boydston_14]

Sequel. I guess I'm with everyone else when I ask:
What would warrant a reboot?

[FaT_tONle]

take a three year layoff... SM4 in 2011 with a new cast and characters... that's the best way to go if they can't sign anyone to come back...

[Danger Mouse]

Raimi cares about the quality of the movies because he cares about the character. That's why I think no other director could top him. Does anyone have suggestions for directors that would do a good job if they had to reboot?
How could I not agree with this? Raimi DEFINITELY cares for the characters. Who'd want a director who'd make Peter Parker a science geek genius who builds his own webshooter? Who'd want a director who doesn't have the sense to know that Mary Jane is NOT a bombshell with firm, supple breasts and straight teeth? Who'd want a brainless hack for a director who thinks that the Green Groblin shouldn't be a demented man in a Power Rangers suit and aweful helmet? Who'd want a director who thinks that Peter should fall in love with Gwen Stacy first?

Yep. Sam suuuure cares for the characters. :up:


Reboot.

[griffolyon12]

I would love a sequel,but if there isn't one I could see a reboot in about ten or so years.

[Melkia2880]

There may come a time when a reboot is needed, but I think there is still some good story to be told with these characters. Though I think the bad guys are drying up just a bit, there may be loads of baddies in the comics, but only a handful of them are worth a shot on the big screen, and we've seen most of those already.