View Full Version : Batman is reckless and dumb? No.
Leon the Professional
12-07-2006, 10:17 PM
I just felt like addressing 2 common complaints about the movie, which I disagree with. I’m open to being wrong about the following, but I think my defense makes some sense.
Batman drives recklessly with the Tumbler
If you rewatch the chase, you will see that:
(1) Batman drives over the cop car in the very beginning because it is blocking his exit out of the alley, so it is not unnecessary
(2) Batman first tries to simply evade the cops, driving defensively and not offensively, simply trying to lose them
(3) Since he's not losing them on the roads, he takes to the rooftops to try to lose them
(4) ONLY after he still fails to lose the cops by driving defensively, and he is nearing his route to the Batcave, before which he absolutely has to lose them so they don't follow him home, does he begin to drive offensively and use the Tumbler's weaponry to make the cop cars crash
In other words, Batman does not start out demolishing cop cars. He only resorts to it out of necessity towards the end.
In sum, I agree that the Tumbler escape/chase was unnecessarily destructive (and borderline silly w/ the rooftop driving), and it was written this way to keep the average viewer amused. However, Goyer and Nolan were careful to make the destructive nature of the chase justifiable, so that Batman is not just being reckless.
Batman should have made the antidote himself and taken it with him to Arkham
(1) Batman is not dumb.
Just because the movie does not reveal that Bruce trained himself in stuff like lab/forensic science, does not mean he didn't. They could very well address this in the sequels.
A lot of people complain that Fox has to educate him about chemistry. But rewatch the bedroom scene, when Bruce wakes up after being drugged by Scarecrow. He says to Alfred that he was poisoned by a "psychotropic hallucinogen, in aerosol form". Does that sound like the words of an ignorant man? He could have just said "some kind of fear gas".
Then he notices Fox, and his face makes this "oh ****" expression. Why? Because he has to conceal his true self from Fox. So after Fox explains the chemical basis of synthesizing the antidote, and Bruce says "Am I gonna understand any of that?" this is not because he doesn't. It's because he is pretending he doesn't. Notice, just before he says the line he glances at Alfred, as if an acknowledgment that he realizes he needs to keep up the ignorant playboy act.
(2) So why doesn't Bruce just make the antidote himself?
Even if he was a scientific genius like in the comics, and he did know how to synthesize more of the antidote by himself, would it have been the sensible way to spend his time? Batman is in the middle of trying to solve what is going on w/ Falcone, Scarecrow, and those drugs. Why should he waste invaluable hours in his Batcave making the antidote by himself, when Fox can do it just as easily, as well as faster because he is more experienced, has better lab resources, and has just finished synthesizing the antidote so the exact procedure is fresh in his mind? Bruce may very well know how to do it, but he hasn't had time to fill his Batcave with lab equipment and he's been too preoccupied being imprisoned in a Bhutanese jail and training with the League of Shadows to keep practicing his lab skills.
I'd compare Batman to a doctor. Doctors are taught how to do lab work, but they always order lab tests. They could do it by themselves if they have to but they never do because they have more important things to do. Similarly, if Batman is busy, he has more important things to do. I'd like to see Batman do some biochemistry and forensics stuff in his Batcave in the sequels, but under circumstances where he is not rushed for results, Fox is unavailable, or he needs to keep it secret even from Fox.
(3) Lastly, since he was still waiting for Fox to give him more of the antidote when he left for Arkham, he couldn't have taken a vile with him. How did he know it would be there when he got back with Rachel? Maybe Fox let him know (off screen) that he'd have it sent over by the evening. Is this all very convenient to lead to a Tumbler chase rushing Rachel to the Batcave? Yes, but the way it's written, it's not like Batman is too dumb to make and take the antidote with him.
Beelze
12-08-2006, 11:52 AM
You forgot to mention that Bruce was unconscious for two days after his first contact with Scarecrow, so he couldn't have made the antidote. It was natural that Alfred contacted Lucius (and he did wait a whole day before doing it, so it wasn't like he was rushing to involve other people).
ChrisBaleBatman
12-08-2006, 01:21 PM
Yeah. I mean, Bruce couldn't make the antidote while he was passed out.
Of coruse, the Bat-God we sometimes get in the comics probably could though....lol.
Actually, the ONE thing that keeps pissing me off is when people say there weren't any detective aspects in the film.
There were. Watch the film again. There's detective stuff in there.
thedarks0ldier
12-09-2006, 05:46 PM
Yeah. I mean, Bruce couldn't make the antidote while he was passed out.
Of coruse, the Bat-God we sometimes get in the comics probably could though....lol.
Actually, the ONE thing that keeps pissing me off is when people say there weren't any detective aspects in the film.
There were. Watch the film again. There's detective stuff in there.Most of the dective stuff happens before he even gets the idea of becoming batman, like when he is on the floor sitting with his legs crossed with all the news papers and notepad and jugo de naranja.
Leon the Professional
12-09-2006, 06:49 PM
That's good you guys brought up the lack of detective work complaint, which I also agree is false. I should've addressed that as well, but I'm too busy studying to do it now.
We should dedicate this thread to these complaints and link people who criticize BB for Batman's driving, not making antidote himself, not doing detective work, etc. I still see people making these complaints in The Dark Knight forum threads all the time, but then none of those people is disputing my defense in this thread now. Although I guess it's possible they just haven't noticed it yet.
I Am The Knight
12-09-2006, 08:10 PM
Also, Batman driving recklessly is something he would do at this point in his career, when he's just starting, and is very intense about everything. Another thing, Batman is not a boy scout.
Dope Nose
12-09-2006, 08:35 PM
Batman drives recklessly with the Tumbler
If you rewatch the chase, you will see that:
(1) Batman drives over the cop car in the very beginning because it is blocking his exit out of the alley, so it is not unnecessary
I disagree. just rewatched the scene and it looks like there's plenty of room for him to drive around the cop car. I had always assumed that he was trying to disable their engine so that they couldn't pursue him.
A lot of people complain that Fox has to educate him about chemistry. But rewatch the bedroom scene, when Bruce wakes up after being drugged by Scarecrow. He says to Alfred that he was poisoned by a "psychotropic hallucinogen, in aerosol form". Does that sound like the words of an ignorant man? He could have just said "some kind of fear gas".
hallucinogen and aerosol are pretty common words.
Leon the Professional
12-09-2006, 10:03 PM
I disagree. just rewatched the scene and it looks like there's plenty of room for him to drive around the cop car. I had always assumed that he was trying to disable their engine so that they couldn't pursue him.
hallucinogen and aerosol are pretty common words.
Nowhere near as common as "fear" and "gas". And even you aren't going to suggest that "psychotropic" is common, are you?
As for him having room to drive around the cop car, I'll have to rewatch the scene.
Dope Nose
12-09-2006, 10:15 PM
no, I wouldn't suggest that. of course he never actually says 'psychotropic' so it's sort of a moot point.
Leon the Professional
12-10-2006, 12:13 AM
no, I wouldn't suggest that. of course he never actually says 'psychotropic' so it's sort of a moot point.
You're right, he doesn't say it in the bedroom scene. I apologize, I was working off of memory.
However, he does say it. Just to Gordon, not Alfred:
"Crane poisoned her with a psychotropic hallucinogen, a panic-inducing toxin."
I'm pretty sure this still counts, no?
Comic Book Boy
12-10-2006, 12:57 AM
Try to disprove the plot hole with the microwave emitter and why Batman didn't just drive the Tumbler himself.
Dope Nose
12-10-2006, 01:06 AM
or simply shut down power to the train since he had access to it through Wayne Tower.
Leon the Professional
12-10-2006, 01:53 AM
Just because I disagree with certain criticisms about the movie doesn't mean I think it's flawless. No need to be jackasses about this thread.
Shutting down power to the train is a good point I never thought of.
Microwave emitter doesn't bother me too much, since the beam is focused and points straight down at the mains underground. It's still kind ascrewy, but you can imagine that they developed new microwave technology or something.
I can give you my own criticisms too. For example, the docks scene when Batman takes out Falcone's thugs is too brightly lit. It starts out great, with Batman pulling the screaming thug into darkness, but there's no more darkness after that. Goyer wrote a great description in his script, saying that as Batman shatters the lights with his batarangs "darkness advances" on the thugs. You never get a sense of that the way Nolan filmed it. It should have been disorientingly dark.
I can give you more criticisms, but that's not the point of this thread.
ChrisBaleBatman
12-11-2006, 11:15 PM
Most of the dective stuff happens before he even gets the idea of becoming batman, like when he is on the floor sitting with his legs crossed with all the news papers and notepad and jugo de naranja.
And?
It's still him beneath the mask, you know.
And, looking at it.....I think he does most of the detective work in the costume anyways. He followed the lead to narrows and interrogated Flass and eavesdropped on Crane in Arkham.
Also, Batman driving recklessly is something he would do at this point in his career, when he's just starting, and is very intense about everything. Another thing, Batman is not a boy scout.
For some reason, I think people still think he's a boy scout. Dunno why, Boy Scout Batman is no fun at all.
hallucinogen and aerosol are pretty common words.
Not to the everyday man. Those words convey that the character is atleast not an idiot.
I disagree. just rewatched the scene and it looks like there's plenty of room for him to drive around the cop car. I had always assumed that he was trying to disable their engine so that they couldn't pursue him.
Well, in all seriousness....those cops are ****ty drivers. Pffftt....I'd had run them all over, really.
Try to disprove the plot hole with the microwave emitter and why Batman didn't just drive the Tumbler himself.
What do you mean?
or simply shut down power to the train since he had access to it through Wayne Tower.
Oh yeah, that'd had been real fun all right. Have the finale end with the train just shutting down like that, and nothing happen.
The point was to have showdown with something on the line. With everything at stake.....it's storytelling. And it's a movie. Not a documentary......or maybe it is, I dunno anymore the way some people debate on these boards.
Dope Nose
12-11-2006, 11:32 PM
The point was to have showdown with something on the line. With everything at stake.....it's storytelling. And it's a movie.
well, that's sort of the point, isn't it? that they're telling a story and therefore have control over the situation they place these characters in. at the very least they should have the characters' actions make sense.
re: your signature, what's a 'gansta'?
El Payaso
12-11-2006, 11:53 PM
A gangster
Dope Nose
12-12-2006, 12:01 AM
shouldn't it be 'gangsta' then?
El Payaso
12-12-2006, 12:17 AM
Probably.
The Kid
12-12-2006, 06:29 PM
Yawn, welcome to last year.
As I saw it, the whole reason people labeled his actions as dumb was because he could have avoided all the damage and potential deaths of gothams cops if he let Gordon take rachael and had alfred deliver the drugs to a specific address or whatever...
Just a last note to all the batman begins worshippers who watch begins every night and kiss their dvd before bedtime: the movie has its flaws. That's it. When I saw it, I enjoyed what I enjoyed in it, but to me it wasn't the holy grail of comic book movies that people online hyped it to be. That's probably the way it is for a lot of people who watched it. Just live with that fact, be glad it wasn't full of rubber nipples and butts, and hope for better in TDK.
thank you for your time and goodnight.
ChrisBaleBatman
12-13-2006, 01:55 AM
well, that's sort of the point, isn't it? that they're telling a story and therefore have control over the situation they place these characters in. at the very least they should have the characters' actions make sense.
And it did. Batman was trying to stop the train, but if he failed to do so Gordon would be the back upplan to make sure the train never made it across.
re: your signature, what's a 'gansta'?
On the streets, it's slang for badass. Of course, depends what streets your on....could literally mean a "G", as into some crazy ****. But, I usually use it as slang for a badass or cool.
shouldn't it be 'gangsta' then?
Cool thing about slang....you can subtract letters. :yay:
As I saw it, the whole reason people labeled his actions as dumb was because he could have avoided all the damage and potential deaths of gothams cops if he let Gordon take rachael and had alfred deliver the drugs to a specific address or whatever...
That probably would have been dumber.
He was wreckless. Yes. It's actually TOLD to us that he is, as if it wasn't obvious.
And he could have the drugs delivered. It'd had take a hell of alot of time to get that done. It's better, faster and smarter to just take her to the drugs than have her taken somewhere and have the butler drive the drugs to her.
Atleast....it seems so, lol.
Just a last note to all the batman begins worshippers who watch begins every night and kiss their dvd before bedtime: the movie has its flaws. That's it. When I saw it, I enjoyed what I enjoyed in it, but to me it wasn't the holy grail of comic book movies that people online hyped it to be. That's probably the way it is for a lot of people who watched it. Just live with that fact, be glad it wasn't full of rubber nipples and butts, and hope for better in TDK.
With what fact? That you didn't like it so much? That's actually pretty easy....
Anita18
12-13-2006, 03:11 AM
I'd compare Batman to a doctor. Doctors are taught how to do lab work, but they always order lab tests.
I'd like to make one thing clear: most doctors don't know crap about how to do lab work. I work in a cancer research lab, and my boss said that when he was a postdoctoral fellow, a young MD joined his lab and even though he knew absolutely squat about how to do ANYTHING lab-related, he was being thrown oodles of money to do lab work with. (Boss therefore couldn't advise anyone to go to grad school, if you can be an MD and be paid 5x as much to do lab work you don't know how to do, but that's another point entirely.) This is why MD/PhD programs exist nowadays - so you can be a doctor AND know how to do lab work. :oldrazz: I'd to think of Batman as being better than a doctor in that sense. :cwink:
But I do agree that Bats just cannot do everything himself, which is why he recruits Alfred and Fox to help him along. His detective work was also mentioned offhandedly: Rachel referred to the "bat-character" giving them "drugs, prints, cargo manifests." Not to mention the photos of Falcone...
I'm a scientist and I bought the microwave emitter concept. They mentioned that they were focused and that was good enough for me. Lasers are focused electromagnetic waves, so why not? (You can even focus lasers enough to pull things with, believe it or not..)
The only reckless and over-the-top thing that bothered me regarding his driving was the seemingly unnecessary crash through the toll booth at the end. He had lost all of the cop cars by that time, and there didn't seem to be anyone in the booth to see him, so crashing through the gate would have sufficed...
dude love
12-13-2006, 03:37 AM
While I agree with you for the most part Leon. I thought they could've come up with some less lethal ways to stop the cop cars. Some way to destroy the wheels maybe?
Also anita the microwave wasn't concentrated. t was spread, like a micorwave oven would. The heat starts in the middle and then moves outward in a 360 degree perimiter. Thus humans had to have dehydrated as well. But it's the sort of thing you can look past for a comic book movie.
Anita18
12-13-2006, 04:02 AM
Also anita the microwave wasn't concentrated. t was spread, like a micorwave oven would. The heat starts in the middle and then moves outward in a 360 degree perimiter. Thus humans had to have dehydrated as well. But it's the sort of thing you can look past for a comic book movie.
Did they mention that part? All I remember was "focused microwaves" and I assumed that they'd be aimed at the water pipes. I'm no chemistry whiz so I don't even know if that's possible to do with microwaves but....whatever.
And it wouldn't be dehydrated, it would be more like, burst into steam, LOL.
chosen1
12-13-2006, 10:49 AM
I just felt like addressing 2 common complaints about the movie, which I disagree with. I’m open to being wrong about the following, but I think my defense makes some sense.
Batman drives recklessly with the Tumbler
If you rewatch the chase, you will see that:
(1) Batman drives over the cop car in the very beginning because it is blocking his exit out of the alley, so it is not unnecessary
(2) Batman first tries to simply evade the cops, driving defensively and not offensively, simply trying to lose them
(3) Since he's not losing them on the roads, he takes to the rooftops to try to lose them
(4) ONLY after he still fails to lose the cops by driving defensively, and he is nearing his route to the Batcave, before which he absolutely has to lose them so they don't follow him home, does he begin to drive offensively and use the Tumbler's weaponry to make the cop cars crash
In other words, Batman does not start out demolishing cop cars. He only resorts to it out of necessity towards the end.
In sum, I agree that the Tumbler escape/chase was unnecessarily destructive (and borderline silly w/ the rooftop driving), and it was written this way to keep the average viewer amused. However, Goyer and Nolan were careful to make the destructive nature of the chase justifiable, so that Batman is not just being reckless.
Batman should have made the antidote himself and taken it with him to Arkham
(1) Batman is not dumb.
Just because the movie does not reveal that Bruce trained himself in stuff like lab/forensic science, does not mean he didn't. They could very well address this in the sequels.
A lot of people complain that Fox has to educate him about chemistry. But rewatch the bedroom scene, when Bruce wakes up after being drugged by Scarecrow. He says to Alfred that he was poisoned by a "psychotropic hallucinogen, in aerosol form". Does that sound like the words of an ignorant man? He could have just said "some kind of fear gas".
Then he notices Fox, and his face makes this "oh ****" expression. Why? Because he has to conceal his true self from Fox. So after Fox explains the chemical basis of synthesizing the antidote, and Bruce says "Am I gonna understand any of that?" this is not because he doesn't. It's because he is pretending he doesn't. Notice, just before he says the line he glances at Alfred, as if an acknowledgment that he realizes he needs to keep up the ignorant playboy act.
(2) So why doesn't Bruce just make the antidote himself?
Even if he was a scientific genius like in the comics, and he did know how to synthesize more of the antidote by himself, would it have been the sensible way to spend his time? Batman is in the middle of trying to solve what is going on w/ Falcone, Scarecrow, and those drugs. Why should he waste invaluable hours in his Batcave making the antidote by himself, when Fox can do it just as easily, as well as faster because he is more experienced, has better lab resources, and has just finished synthesizing the antidote so the exact procedure is fresh in his mind? Bruce may very well know how to do it, but he hasn't had time to fill his Batcave with lab equipment and he's been too preoccupied being imprisoned in a Bhutanese jail and training with the League of Shadows to keep practicing his lab skills.
I'd compare Batman to a doctor. Doctors are taught how to do lab work, but they always order lab tests. They could do it by themselves if they have to but they never do because they have more important things to do. Similarly, if Batman is busy, he has more important things to do. I'd like to see Batman do some biochemistry and forensics stuff in his Batcave in the sequels, but under circumstances where he is not rushed for results, Fox is unavailable, or he needs to keep it secret even from Fox.
(3) Lastly, since he was still waiting for Fox to give him more of the antidote when he left for Arkham, he couldn't have taken a vile with him. How did he know it would be there when he got back with Rachel? Maybe Fox let him know (off screen) that he'd have it sent over by the evening. Is this all very convenient to lead to a Tumbler chase rushing Rachel to the Batcave? Yes, but the way it's written, it's not like Batman is too dumb to make and take the antidote with him.
"We musnt judge too harshly, ... it was his first time.... and that is what our boy is doing he is refining his methods he is evolving." -- Hannibal Lecter
ChrisBaleBatman
12-13-2006, 12:28 PM
lol.....I love that quote.
BatScot
12-13-2006, 07:59 PM
or simply shut down power to the train since he had access to it through Wayne Tower.LOL. While saying this Batman is dumb might be taking things a bit too far, he's by no means the brightest... and that’s not The Bat-Man.
ChrisBaleBatman
12-14-2006, 12:24 AM
Someone re-up that quote.
SEMPERFY
12-14-2006, 02:34 AM
[quote=ChrisBaleBatman]And it did. Batman was trying to stop the train, but if he failed to do so Gordon would be the back upplan to make sure the train never made it across.
nice touch!, i love it:up:
dude love
12-14-2006, 03:42 AM
Did they mention that part? All I remember was "focused microwaves" and I assumed that they'd be aimed at the water pipes. I'm no chemistry whiz so I don't even know if that's possible to do with microwaves but....whatever.
And it wouldn't be dehydrated, it would be more like, burst into steam, LOL.
I stand corrected on the second part. LOL.
I'm pretty sure Lucius Fox explained it. But still, I'm positive you can't aim microwaves.
chosen1
12-14-2006, 10:43 AM
I stand corrected on the second part. LOL.
I'm pretty sure Lucius Fox explained it. But still, I'm positive you can't aim microwaves.
If you can build satilites in space that can focus in on where you live and read the plate number off your car then....
ChrisBaleBatman
12-15-2006, 04:13 PM
Well, it is a movie. If in the movie they say they can focus and aim mircrowaves, then in the realm of the film.....it can happen, ya know? I mean, I can understand if you have knowledge of this stuff and it bothers you. But, try to brush it off. It's a movie, and more often than not....they make they're own rules.
Leon the Professional
12-15-2006, 07:47 PM
About shutting down power to the train...
I'm pretty sure that Ra's, who tells Batman that he's infiltrated every level of Gotham's infrastructure, would have also infiltrated the place where the power to the train is generated, and have made sure to have a lot of his ninjas heavily guarding the place, so it wouldn't be that simple for Batman to just shut it down.
It's arguable that Batman could have very well realized this, but given the timing of the events, he decided that he didn't have time to rely on this plan of action. They just made the mistake of not showing him consider this as an option.
Leon the Professional
12-15-2006, 08:00 PM
I'd like to make one thing clear: most doctors don't know crap about how to do lab work.... This is why MD/PhD programs exist nowadays - so you can be a doctor AND know how to do lab work. :oldrazz: I'd to think of Batman as being better than a doctor in that sense. :cwink:
..
You're right, MD/PhD is a better example for Batman.
Canadian Rider
12-15-2006, 08:25 PM
Look ... I love, LOVED the new movie. The tumbler was rocking ... but come on. Really. Can you really imagine the comic version of the tumbler? Can you? I get the antidote ... that didn't bother too much. I wouldn't even mind the tumbler to get to downtown G-town ... but in the downtown? Flying onto buildings and disappearing because he turned off the lights?:whatever:
Let's all admit that jumping from the parking garage to the building was jumping the shark. Even Nolan/Bale would have to admit that they really liked the car and just wanted an excuse to have it in the movie.
Nolan "So we have this fast and wicked car."
Bale"Really? Can I see it. Oh MAN that Rocks!"
etc. etc. :yay:
CConn
12-15-2006, 08:30 PM
Look ... I love, LOVED the new movie. The tumbler was rocking ... but come on. Really. Can you really imagine the comic version of the tumbler? Can you?Actually, I can...
http://img2.imagepile.net/img2b/853miller-batmobile.gif
ChrisBaleBatman
12-16-2006, 12:02 AM
I find it ****ing funny that some people think the movie is meant to be a documentary.
It's a movie. A movie based a comic book. It's not supposed to be ultra realistic. It can have the illusion of realism....which most good comic films do, but doesn't have to be real.
Canadian Rider
12-16-2006, 12:14 AM
Actually, I can...
http://img2.imagepile.net/img2b/853miller-batmobile.gif
Funny but I don't remember Bruce having that for daily driving in the cave. That was my point. :yay:
Canadian Rider
12-16-2006, 12:22 AM
I find it ****ing funny that some people think the movie is meant to be a documentary.
It's a movie. A movie based a comic book. It's not supposed to be ultra realistic. It can have the illusion of realism....which most good comic films do, but doesn't have to be real.
I see your point, but I was trying to indicate that for a movie that spent so much time building a background and a story that would lead to Bruce becoming batman it seemed strange that rather than have a "suped" up car he drives a vehicle that is so over the top as the tumbler.
That isn't even that bad, but it was when he landed on the roof of the building that I for one experienced the "okay. We now can totally suspend reality because if he flung that vehicle at the roof of most of the buildings I have ever seen in gotham he should have crashed through the roof and dropped in on the congregrants below!" per the COMICS that the movie was based on.
You will note that the special effects started kicking in at that point in a more obtrusive way and it seemed to slide slowly towards the Burton visions of silliness.
My opinion. :woot:
PS - surprisingly the LA police department does not loose large black vehicles if they turn off their lights. Apparently their spotlights actually illuminate large black vehicles.
WAIT -- maybe OJ should have gone for a ride at night, in a dark vehicle and turned the lights off! :wow:
ChrisBaleBatman
12-19-2006, 12:35 AM
Funny but I don't remember Bruce having that for daily driving in the cave. That was my point. :yay:
But it's still from the comics, though. A landmark story, actually. And, it proves that the Tumbler isn't "crossing some line that should never be crossed" either. It's just ****ing cool, man.
I see your point, but I was trying to indicate that for a movie that spent so much time building a background and a story that would lead to Bruce becoming batman it seemed strange that rather than have a "suped" up car he drives a vehicle that is so over the top as the tumbler.
but, the car is really a sign of the change the film is from the others. It's probably more of a statment that needed to be made towards what the film is all about.
That isn't even that bad, but it was when he landed on the roof of the building that I for one experienced the "okay. We now can totally suspend reality because if he flung that vehicle at the roof of most of the buildings I have ever seen in gotham he should have crashed through the roof and dropped in on the congregrants below!" per the COMICS that the movie was based on.
Well, the dashboard graphics supposedly gave Batman the buildings that could structually support the weight of the car. So, there.....that's something that would certainly make sense in the realm of the comics.
You will note that the special effects started kicking in at that point in a more obtrusive way and it seemed to slide slowly towards the Burton visions of silliness.
What do you mean exactly?
PS - surprisingly the LA police department does not loose large black vehicles if they turn off their lights. Apparently their spotlights actually illuminate large black vehicles.
Well, it was night time. The cops in Gotham suck. They didn't expect the car to suddenly go stealth (which it did).
Waitaminute....I'm pretty sure the LAPD suck too.....they'd probably lose a car the same way, and it wouldn't have to be a military vehicle built for **** like that....
Fenrir
12-19-2006, 04:14 AM
Flying onto buildings and disappearing because he turned off the lights?:whatever:
OK, this has been brought up so many times and for so long I hoped someone would've been smart enough to bring it up but alas, it seems that the only thing some people are good at is *****ing and complaining over things they don't understand.
First of all, the tracking searchlights on helicopters are not manually operated. They work using thermal imaging that automatically track the heat emissions from the engines of a vehicle. That's why in real-life, patrol helicopters don't lose or confuse suspect vehicles on the open road.
Now when Batman engages "stealth mode" on the Tumbler, you see that only do the lights turn off, but the thundering engine also quiets down. This was explained in the leaked script that in stealth mode, the Tumbler switches to an electric engine that does not give off any heat emissions and combine that with the angular plates with RAM coating taken straight from F-117s, the Tumbler would be invisible to both thermal and radar tracking systems.
Now, as soon as Batman engages stealth mode, he immediately pulls back. Now the cops couldn't keep track on him because the helicopter searchlight lost it's focus from the Tumbler. As you know, if you immediately go from a well-lit from into a dark room, it will take your eyes some time to adjust to the lighting before you get your bearings. Likewise, earlier the Tumbler was lit up like a Dutch brothel on the freeway with the helicopter searchlight, but as soon as it went into stealth mode, it became a black dot on a pitch black freeway, where light is the only means of identification:
http://files.photojerk.com/Killphaser/bmc1.JPG
http://files.photojerk.com/Killphaser/bmc2.JPG
Can you see the Tumbler in those pics or not? Neither could the cops. Of course, like the example I have given above, the cops eventually "see" the Tumbler once their eyes got used to the darkness of the freeway when the helicopter broke pursuit.
Sure, it requires a little suspension of disbelief but really, it's a pretty contemporary concept and not all impossible or lacking sense like the posters in here have repeatedly claimed it to be.
Fenrir
12-19-2006, 04:37 AM
Oh and for the record, steel reinforced concrete can handle about three tons of weight. Since official specs of the Tumbler put it somewhere around 2 tons, no, the Tumbler wouldn't have crashed through the roofs realistically speaking.
Lightning54SC
12-19-2006, 10:57 AM
Yawn, welcome to last year.
As I saw it, the whole reason people labeled his actions as dumb was because he could have avoided all the damage and potential deaths of gothams cops if he let Gordon take rachael and had alfred deliver the drugs to a specific address or whatever...
Just a last note to all the batman begins worshippers who watch begins every night and kiss their dvd before bedtime: the movie has its flaws. That's it. When I saw it, I enjoyed what I enjoyed in it, but to me it wasn't the holy grail of comic book movies that people online hyped it to be. That's probably the way it is for a lot of people who watched it. Just live with that fact, be glad it wasn't full of rubber nipples and butts, and hope for better in TDK.
thank you for your time and goodnight.
you have to admitt it was much better then Superman Returns... :oldrazz:
Lightning54SC
12-19-2006, 11:01 AM
also for you people who say the tumbler dissappears is crap and yadda yadda yadda can i remind you of Harry Houdini? Well he wasn't like today's magicians who are only interested in television ratings. He was an artist. He could make an elephant disappear in the middle of a theater filled with people, and do you know how he did that? Misdirection. Misdirection. What the eyes see and the ears hear, the mind believes... it can be possible for him to disappear :woot: :word:
Leon the Professional
12-19-2006, 10:38 PM
OK, this has been brought up so many times and for so long I hoped someone would've been smart enough to bring it up but alas, it seems that the only thing some people are good at is *****ing and complaining over things they don't understand.
This is exactly the feeling I had when I started this thread. Thanks for explaining the stealth mode and lack of roof crashing.
Although there ARE flaws to the movie (I have my own criticisms, as I said), a lot of "flaws" the movie is criticized for are unfounded.
ChrisBaleBatman
12-20-2006, 03:36 PM
Wow.....Fenrir.....that's some great info. Great pics too. Thanks for getting us in the "know".
Miranda Fox
12-21-2006, 08:05 AM
About shutting down power to the train...
I'm pretty sure that Ra's, who tells Batman that he's infiltrated every level of Gotham's infrastructure, would have also infiltrated the place where the power to the train is generated, and have made sure to have a lot of his ninjas heavily guarding the place, so it wouldn't be that simple for Batman to just shut it down.
It's arguable that Batman could have very well realized this, but given the timing of the events, he decided that he didn't have time to rely on this plan of action. They just made the mistake of not showing him consider this as an option.
Exactly!
Seriously, that WINS as the least logical argument I've ever seen against BB. Hey, look, I won't dispute it's flawed. Never have. But this is just getting to the point of stupid here.
I'd like to add something - even assuming Bruce could have gone in and told them to shut off the power and they did it, no questions asked (yeah, that would've happened) the power would not have shut off straight away. It runs on a rail, it's not like a light switch and the train is a large, heavy object moving at speed. It. Would. Not. Stop. Right. Away. It'd probably keep going for a number of yards and the damage would've done. No, it wouldn't be exactly what Ra's wanted, but he would still have had people going nuts.
But wouldn't he have got there before Ra's loaded the train? Possibly, but unlikely. Batman wouldn't even be down there to try and hold them up so, arguably, the whole thing would've proceeded faster without his interference.
Lol, and the detractors are saying BB is illogical...
I find it ****ing funny that some people think the movie is meant to be a documentary.
It's a movie. A movie based a comic book. It's not supposed to be ultra realistic. It can have the illusion of realism....which most good comic films do, but doesn't have to be real.
Once again, word, dude. I'm actually concerned about TDK not because I don't think it'll be good but because nobody seems even remotely willing to give a Nolan a chance.
Yes, great, lets get another director because that worked out *so* well for X-Men 3.
ChrisBaleBatman
12-22-2006, 01:56 AM
Dude......no matter what, Nolan earned his chance, and he's getting it. And he's got most Bat-fans backing him up.
I said most Bat-fans. Most Bat-fans. Most Bat-fans.
Don't want anybody mis-reading my posts, alot of people do that around here.
Fenrir
12-22-2006, 04:16 AM
Don't want anybody mis-reading my posts, alot of people do that around here.
Yeah, like the countless number of dumb posters who keep replying to "Begins was a great film, the best comic book movie yet" with "it's not perfect, it's not without it's flaws". Well d'uh, when did we say otherwise? :rolleyes:
Miranda Fox
12-22-2006, 10:40 AM
Dude......no matter what, Nolan earned his chance, and he's getting it. And he's got most Bat-fans backing him up.
I said most Bat-fans. Most Bat-fans. Most Bat-fans.
Don't want anybody mis-reading my posts, alot of people do that around here.
Lol, it's not you, I was just being my usual pessimistic self. Don't mind me at all.
Yeah, like the countless number of dumb posters who keep replying to "Begins was a great film, the best comic book movie yet" with "it's not perfect, it's not without it's flaws". Well d'uh, when did we say otherwise?
They think by saying that they're busting our bubbles or something. It's a bit lame, really.
ChrisBaleBatman
12-22-2006, 04:16 PM
No, I just had to repeat that "Most Bat-fans were backing up Nolan"......that way, I don't get some Fantastic Four fanboy, or Web-Head, or X-Men fan posting saying "(your hero affiliation) fans aren't backing him up"..........people often forget to read on these boards.
Which is funny.....b/c.....well.....reading is the most important part of being in a messageboard.
Or maybe not. Maybe I'm just crazy.
Miranda Fox
12-22-2006, 04:33 PM
No, I just had to repeat that "Most Bat-fans were backing up Nolan"......that way, I don't get some Fantastic Four fanboy, or Web-Head, or X-Men fan posting saying "(your hero affiliation) fans aren't backing him up"..........people often forget to read on these boards.
Which is funny.....b/c.....well.....reading is the most important part of being in a messageboard.
Or maybe not. Maybe I'm just crazy.
Lol, yes, maybe.
FWIW, I don't think you are. ;)
ChrisBaleBatman
12-22-2006, 05:11 PM
Well, I could be. I'm sure I'd be the last to know....if I were, that is. Then again....how would I know, if I'd be the last know.....
sigh.....someone needs to pose something interesting on this thread, I'm beginning to get bored.....
Miranda Fox
12-22-2006, 07:54 PM
Well, I could be. I'm sure I'd be the last to know....if I were, that is. Then again....how would I know, if I'd be the last know.....
...
My head hurts. :csad:
:) :p
ChrisBaleBatman
12-22-2006, 08:31 PM
I'm here to blow your mind.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.