PDA

View Full Version : Snyder Throws a Sucker Punch


Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

TheWiseGuy487
07-26-2010, 09:05 PM
Well, erm. Uh...







That was ****ing awesome.

Your avatar goes perfectly with your post. :hehe:

Spideyfan93
07-26-2010, 09:08 PM
Oh God...imagining Immigrant Song in a movie like this gives me chills.

Crook
07-26-2010, 09:13 PM
wow! very gorgeous!!

im glad the whole trailer wasnt slow-mo like his previous films.. i think he's certainly growing as a filmmaker.

amazing trailer... definately on my radar now
Surely this is sarcasm? Half that entire trailer wasn't in real-time. :huh:

Anyhoo, anyone else feel like this may be the first film to successfully replicate anime-like action choreography in a live-action setting? Plenty of movies have tried it before, even the Matrix, but I don't think anyone has ever really gotten it right. Be it in looking real relative to its setting, or being as frenetic and beautifully composed.

Snyder really impressed me here.

xwolverine2
07-26-2010, 09:16 PM
Surely this is sarcasm? Half that entire trailer wasn't in real-time. :huh:


half is still less than the entire watchmen trailer being slo-mo
lol

Visceral
07-26-2010, 09:25 PM
google chrome unable to dl

TheComicbookKid
07-26-2010, 09:29 PM
Surely this is sarcasm? Half that entire trailer wasn't in real-time. :huh:

Anyhoo, anyone else feel like this may be the first film to successfully replicate anime-like action choreography in a live-action setting? Plenty of movies have tried it before, even the Matrix, but I don't think anyone has ever really gotten it right. Be it in looking real relative to its setting, or being as frenetic and beautifully composed.

Snyder really impressed me here.

Snyder has always composed beautiful shots. Making emotionally engaging characters has been his pitfall.

Project862006
07-26-2010, 09:31 PM
^ i felt he did that in watchmen

but it had alot to do with the actors he chose

zack for being a very visual director really does cast based on talent

Crook
07-26-2010, 09:35 PM
Snyder has always composed beautiful shots. Making emotionally engaging characters has been his pitfall.
I'm specifically referencing anime action. It's hard to describe, and I can only say that live-action has yet to match their intensity and free-range of the camera. Or the choreography, for that matter.

TheComicbookKid
07-26-2010, 09:36 PM
^ i felt he did that in watchmen

but it had alot to do with the actors he chose


Imo, it had emotinally engaging moments, but to create a character you follow from beginning to end and care about whether they prevail. Handling a group of characters when he hasn't even mastered doing a solo one was a tall order.

Not saying the actors had nothing to do with it.

Sebastos
07-26-2010, 09:37 PM
Youtubed:

17ttgQCgY7w

That was a damn good trailer.

MessiahDecoy123
07-26-2010, 09:43 PM
The breif acting in it is pretty bad though. But it would be worth 10 bucks just for the visuals alone.

Avengers-Report
07-26-2010, 09:46 PM
The Comic-Con footage was ridiculously amazing.

Project862006
07-26-2010, 09:48 PM
The breif acting in it is pretty bad though. But it would be worth 10 bucks just for the visuals alone.

barely got any and Malone /Cornish/and browning are not bad actors they looked fine and the only unproven actors chung and hudgens did not even speak

Doctor Jones
07-26-2010, 09:53 PM
Whoa...

I don't know why... but that trailer was so awesome but in such a strange way. I don't know what else to say to that.

Wait I do now...

That was ****ing awesome. But I still don't know why!

ALP
07-26-2010, 09:54 PM
Snyder is one of my favorites. The man is balls to the walls crazy, never know what to expect from him(besides slo-motion!)

Trailer looks terrific.

S.A.A.D.
07-26-2010, 10:06 PM
The movie looks so damn awesome,the wait for the trailer was very much worth it. :woot:

FaT_tONle
07-26-2010, 11:13 PM
Looks like the entire trailer sums up the movie, never a good thing... if I could pay half price for the ten minutes of money shots I know I'll get, I'd consider watching it.

Figs
07-26-2010, 11:39 PM
Looks cool but of all the movies for Snyder to actually make PG-13 it had to be one with a number of beautiful women kicking ass. :(

S.A.A.D.
07-26-2010, 11:44 PM
I know,I know,but we have no choice but to overcome it. I think this movie will be a cult hit.

Angel_Faerie
07-26-2010, 11:53 PM
The trailer was epic, but doesn't convey the plot of the movie very well. If I didn't know the story, I'd be very confused while watching that.

Figs
07-26-2010, 11:59 PM
I know,I know,but we have no choice but to overcome it. I think this movie
will be a cult hit.

If I can get over Norton not being in the Avengers I can get over this not being rated R...maybe...:woot:

PWN3R
07-27-2010, 12:01 AM
Balls to the wall. Unashamedly balls to the wall. This looks like a "winnah".

Snyder :up:

DACrowe
07-27-2010, 12:02 AM
Looks weird and gimmicky. I'll give it a chance. The sex appeal obviously is its selling point. But it seems like Snyder is really struggling to find his singular voice after showing such visual dazzlement in his first several films.

That-Guy
07-27-2010, 12:22 AM
I really dug the trailer. The visuals look amazing and so do the girls. The movie looks like a burlesque show in hell, which I totally dig. The little bits of dialogue sounded bad, but since dialogue you hear in a trailer NEVER actually makes it to the film these days, I'm not to worried.

Also, I love Emily Browning. She's one of the most talented young actresses out there. She even made a crappy movie like The Uninspired almost worth watching. Almost.

S.A.A.D.
07-27-2010, 12:22 AM
If I can get over Norton not being in the Avengers I can get over this not being rated R...maybe...:woot:

I think there is hope for you,take it from someone who is honestly over Norton not reprising his role in The Avengers. :yay:

dark_b
07-27-2010, 01:05 AM
OMG this was amazing.

http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/9190/2m6v4ic.gif (http://img685.imageshack.us/i/2m6v4ic.gif/)

DarthSkywalker
07-27-2010, 01:37 AM
And it will probably be as weak as both 300 and Watchmen in the script and storytelling department.

Hush
07-27-2010, 01:44 AM
Looks very visually stimulating.

Octoberist
07-27-2010, 02:25 AM
Emily's pouty lips for the win

spider-neil
07-27-2010, 02:59 AM
let's be honest here, snyder has always delievered on the visuals, it's his characters that are seriously lacking. the trailer is a visual feast but nothing is to say his flaw wont be exposed, again.

to be fair to snyder, I thought the characters in dawn of the dead were quite engaging. but that was a movie with little special effects, he had no choice BUT to concentrate on the characters, he has now been seduced by the dark side side and the more money he has to spend the worse he seems to be getting.

jmc
07-27-2010, 04:00 AM
It'll be a case of wait and see for myself. I can't say I saw anything that was overly impressive in the trailer, don't now how to describe it but it's almost as if it's exactly what I was expecting I'd get as a teaser for this film, especially after seeing the recent character one sheets. I know the guy is good with the visuals and all but has always comes up well short with character and story, this is probably the film which tips me one way or the other for Sydner, until now I've been on the fence with him because he's mostly done adapted material, to me this is the moment he shows whether he's got what it takes or whether he's just a better version of Michael Bay (although I'd still watch his stuff over Bay's any day).

CGHulk
07-27-2010, 05:18 AM
It's insane how much money movie studios are spending on films these days, did you see all that? :wow:

Project862006
07-27-2010, 05:44 AM
how has he come up short with character and story i dont understand this

300 was a faithful adaptation he developed the story and character like the book did

and i dont see how the story and characters in watchmen were not developed

dark_b
07-27-2010, 05:49 AM
It'll be a case of wait and see for myself. I can't say I saw anything that was overly impressive in the trailer, don't now how to describe it but it's almost as if it's exactly what I was expecting I'd get as a teaser for this film, especially after seeing the recent character one sheets. I know the guy is good with the visuals and all but has always comes up well short with character and story, this is probably the film which tips me one way or the other for Sydner, until now I've been on the fence with him because he's mostly done adapted material, to me this is the moment he shows whether he's got what it takes or whether he's just a better version of Michael Bay (although I'd still watch his stuff over Bay's any day).what could he have?

what was watchmen? it was based on a graphic novel. he had everything. he did almost nothing unique for the movie. the slo mo shots got boring after the first minutes.

he is a guy who likes to have money shots every 5 minute. he gets the budget. end of story.

i expect nothing from the story.

jmc
07-27-2010, 06:12 AM
Then he's is only ever going to be a hollow director and supporters shouldn't be surprised if he become the next punching bag. The dude's got potential, it's just a damn shame he hasn't reached it.

dark_b
07-27-2010, 06:18 AM
where do you see potential?from what i see he is only about style and nothing else.

nt. IMO the directing style for watchmen was way to cool. it looked to cool.

i saw no unique directing shots from him. they are all cool but IMO not unique. and he never made a serious movie so i dont know how he is with directing actors.

some acting in watchmen was a joke. so out of place.

IMO

Nivek
07-27-2010, 06:19 AM
It's a shame that people feel the need to hammer negativity like there is a damn quota that needs to be filled...

dark_b
07-27-2010, 06:22 AM
well we have you Nivek. and you remind us everytime ;)

jmc
07-27-2010, 06:26 AM
He just needs to work on getting some more substance into his films, they're kind of a one note wonder at the moment. That maybe due to the films being adaptations and him sticking to close to the source, I don't know, Sucker Punch is the test for me, has he grown as a film maker, or is he just going to fall into old habits. We'll find out I guess. That said, hot chicks kicking arse, I'm there either way. ;)

dark_b
07-27-2010, 06:34 AM
does he really need to have more substance?

because IMO directors who have more substance dont do movies like Sucker Punch. and i f.... love how this movie looks. i am happy that Snyder did this.

jmc
07-27-2010, 07:09 AM
Which is why I'd rate him higher if he could be one of those directors that can bring a bit more yet still do movies like Sucker Punch. If he's fine being just a visuals type of guy then more power to him, it'd be a bit of a wasted talent though IMO.

Ipodman
07-27-2010, 07:27 AM
I'm waiting for the next " THIS IS SPARTA!!!"

MOVIELORD101
07-27-2010, 07:33 AM
does he really need to have more substance?

because IMO directors who have more substance dont do movies like Sucker Punch. and i f.... love how this movie looks. i am happy that Snyder did this.

Have we all forgotten that this is the same director who made zombies AWESOME again with his Dawn of the Dead remake? That movie PROVES he's a good director with plenty of substance! Either way, Sucker Punch looks awesome and I'll DEFINITELY BE THERE when it comes out in March!

Monsieur Xavier
07-27-2010, 07:41 AM
Inception trailer was also all visual no substance but I guess if it was Nolan and not Synder who made this movie it would have been different.

spider-neil
07-27-2010, 07:42 AM
It's a shame that people feel the need to hammer negativity like there is a damn quota that needs to be filled...

I can't talk for anyone else but I certainly thought the trailer looked amazing, but then I thought watchmen trailer looked amazing and indeed the watchmen movie LOOKED but from a story, plot and pacing point of view it was all over the frigging place.

spider-neil
07-27-2010, 07:45 AM
Have we all forgotten that this is the same director who made zombies AWESOME again with his Dawn of the Dead remake? That movie PROVES he's a good director with plenty of substance!

you're only as good as your last movie. for instance spielberg and jackson have lost the plot (pun intended).

KenK
07-27-2010, 07:48 AM
Inception trailer was also all visual no substance but I guess if it was Nolan and not Synder who made this movie it would have been different.

And I was going to bring up Inception! I remember that first (and maybe even second) teaser, thinking to myself, "What the hell is this movie about!" I still didn't have a clue until maybe three months before the film came out!

At least with this, I can see audiences getting some idea of what's going on. This girl is plotting to escape some form of captivity. It's simple, but it's definitely enough to engage the audience, especially when coupled with the visuals.

dark_b
07-27-2010, 07:57 AM
Inception trailer was all visuals?

what ? the huge city? 3 shots of a gun sequence?

pleaseeeeeeeeeeee

Monsieur Xavier
07-27-2010, 08:05 AM
^
Of course it was or at least as much as Sucker Punch trailer.

Anyway you perfectly illustrated my point of view with your reply :)
Some people are biased in their judgement or overly critical for a simple trailer.

MOVIELORD101
07-27-2010, 08:06 AM
you're only as good as your last movie. for instance spielberg and jackson have lost the plot (pun intended).

Bulls**t. Spielberg did a great job with Indy IV IMO, and I liked Jackson's version of King Kong. Oh and Snyder's director's cut of Watchmen was excellent.

Seriously guys, stop being such hard-asses towards Snyder. He's a good enough director to not screw this up. He's no Christopher Nolan, but he's proven himself to be good with action and telling a decent story!

MOVIELORD101
07-27-2010, 08:08 AM
And I was going to bring up Inception! I remember that first (and maybe even second) teaser, thinking to myself, "What the hell is this movie about!" I still didn't have a clue until maybe three months before the film came out!

At least with this, I can see audiences getting some idea of what's going on. This girl is plotting to escape some form of captivity. It's simple, but it's definitely enough to engage the audience, especially when coupled with the visuals.

That's EXACTLY my point!

ALP
07-27-2010, 08:17 AM
"Directors with substance don't make movies like this"...what kind of stupid comment is that? Because directors with substance can only make realistic crime thrillers and biopics right?

We don't have a lot to go off of but Snyder has proven he is a capable director. He developed the characters in 300 the best he could, which was more than in Miller's graphic novel. And Watchmen was beautiful and poetic. Want to talk badly about 300 and Dawn of the Dead sure, but I'll never understand the problems people have with Watchmen. I thought the movie was incredible, if not just as good as the book. Snyder translated Moore's characters near perfectly(just as they were in the book, nigh a nip and a tuck here or there). Watchmen is my favorite comic book film, yes, I like it more than The Dark Knight.

But who do you guys consider a competent stylized filmmaker? Every filmmaker in Hollywood who has a visually unique style gets the same complaints. "They care about style over story." Zack Snyder, Tim Burton, Terry Gilliam, Wes Anderson...basically you all just want everyone to make movies like Nolan and Scorsese right:whatever:

Crook
07-27-2010, 08:25 AM
Inception trailer was also all visual no substance but I guess if it was Nolan and not Synder who made this movie it would have been different.
It's a very good point. I remember when the District 9 theatrical trailer came out, someone re-edited it so at the end it would show Michael Bay as the director, instead of Neil.

The result was that everyone panned the movie saying it was going to be balls. They then went on to complain about lack of originality, fast editing, bland visuals, etc.

It's hilarious how people project certain emotions just from seeing one name. :funny:

MOVIELORD101
07-27-2010, 08:31 AM
It's a very good point. I remember when the District 9 theatrical trailer came out, someone re-edited it so at the end it would show Michael Bay as the director, instead of Neil.

The result was that everyone panned the movie saying it was going to be balls. They then went on to complain about lack of originality, fast editing, bland visuals, etc.

It's hilarious how people project certain emotions just from seeing one name. :funny:

Yeah, the hatred towards guys like Michael Bay and ESPECIALLY George Lucas (one of my all-time FAVORITE directors, btw) is overrated. Seriously.

Nivek
07-27-2010, 08:33 AM
This whole "fanbagging" (the opposite of being an eager "fanboy", someone who trashes a concept and belittles the fans as being stupid) thing is getting ridiculous. I mean, if I'm not interested in a film or think something looks like crap, 9 times out of 10 I don't even comment on it. If you don't like what Snyder (or any creator for that matter) does, all the power to you. But reading nagging page after page after page... move the **** on.

Cinemaman
07-27-2010, 10:23 AM
IMO, I'd say Snyder is a mediocre director at best. His Dawn of the Dead was the best film I have seen from him since the start of his career (w/out taking into account numerous commercial ads, which were well-done). The trailer for his new film didn't impress me at all. CGI looks pretty bad and I doubt I found the story to be engaging. I also don't understand why he always uses blue screen and vfx in every single shot. Today it seems very cheap to me. Natural sets are still irreplaceable, even with a really mind-blowing technology.

dark_b
07-27-2010, 10:31 AM
its stylized. dont expect the CGI to look real.

its meant to look like it is IMO.

Cagefighterkip
07-27-2010, 11:34 AM
do we have download links yet(for quicktime)? if so would it be much trouble to ask for some please? thanks :) <3

Lord Blackbolt
07-27-2010, 11:50 AM
trailer looks awesome IMO. I can't wait.

ALP
07-27-2010, 11:59 AM
This film will definitely be interesting in concerns to Zack Snyder as a filmmaker and writer. Before he has had help on all of his films- one remake and two very close adaptations. This is the first film where we get to see 100% Snyder...what he has in his own bag.

Project862006
07-27-2010, 01:01 PM
if Snyder is only as good as his last then he is at a great spot since watchmen was my favorite movie of 2009 he developed the characters very well other than ozy imo and he was'nt very developed in the book that much either

Snyder's film have alot of substance imo people just see his stylized style and just rag on him.You can only have substance if it is a realistic crime thriller style of film making apprently.

Brick
07-27-2010, 01:31 PM
if Snyder is only as good as his last then he is at a great spot since watchmen was my favorite movie of 2009 he developed the characters very well other than ozy imo and he was'nt very developed in the book that much either

Snyder's film have alot of substance imo people just see his stylized style and just rag on him.You can only have substance if it is a realistic crime thriller style of film making apprently.
...err yes he was. Did you not read the interveiw supplement towards the end of the book?

Nivek
07-27-2010, 01:54 PM
do we have download links yet(for quicktime)? if so would it be much trouble to ask for some please? thanks :) <3


http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2011/Sucker-Punch/trailer.php

Project862006
07-27-2010, 01:54 PM
i sure did i meant as an on screen(panel) character

he was barely there

Brick
07-27-2010, 01:56 PM
Oh ok.

Nivek
07-27-2010, 01:57 PM
This film will definitely be interesting in concerns to Zack Snyder as a filmmaker and writer. Before he has had help on all of his films- one remake and two very close adaptations. This is the first film where we get to see 100% Snyder...what he has in his own bag.

See, this is what I get out of it. DOTD was pretty much a remake, 300 and watchmen and that Owl movie are Adoptions, this is all him. Personally, I'm pretty impressed by the guy, and I'm curious what he will give us.

Electrofarce
07-27-2010, 02:09 PM
its stylized. dont expect the CGI to look real.

its meant to look like it is IMO.

looked real to me. it really does look real enough. only crazy fanboys complain about cgi and stuff. the general public has no complaints.

dark_b
07-27-2010, 04:02 PM
it doesnt look real because its stylized. and its not meant to look real. i like it.

Project862006
07-27-2010, 04:11 PM
it does'nt look real but it does'nt look fake either if that makes sense

spider-neil
07-27-2010, 04:18 PM
bulls**t. Spielberg did a great job with indy iv imo,

yikes!!

Electrofarce
07-27-2010, 04:25 PM
it doesnt look real because its stylized. and its not meant to look real. i like it.

IMO "real" in vfx talk means that something is well rendered, detailed, and well-lit to fit the enviroment that is presented around it.

everything in this trailer fits that description so stylized or not i think it looks real.

Project862006
07-27-2010, 04:27 PM
^ and to think they got like 8 more months of post production to make it even better

Electrofarce
07-27-2010, 04:31 PM
^ and to think they got like 8 more months of post production to make it even better

no wonder. the trailer does'nt look unfinished it looks like all th fx shots are complete

AVEITWITHJAMON
07-27-2010, 04:44 PM
Well, I have loved all of Synder's movies so far, with Watchmen being his best so far and an excellent movie and adaptation IMO.

But Sucker Punch looks like it may top them all, what is wrong with some people? This looks astonishing!

dark_b
07-27-2010, 05:07 PM
you have to respect Snyder for making an action fantasy movie where all the main characters are young girls.

http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/1050/zz1496bc28.jpg (http://img190.imageshack.us/i/zz1496bc28.jpg/)

Mr. Credible
07-27-2010, 05:09 PM
Wow...

like, seriously... wow.

xwolverine2
07-27-2010, 05:17 PM
if Snyder is only as good as his last then he is at a great spot since watchmen was my favorite movie of 2009 he developed the characters very well other than ozy imo and he was'nt very developed in the book that much either

Snyder's film have alot of substance imo people just see his stylized style and just rag on him.You can only have substance if it is a realistic crime thriller style of film making apprently.

His films dont have the best characters or development...they are just there to move the story along (with great visuals)... every one of his films has ended in a tragedy, so i could see why some would think theres something more than just visuals, but its really just sending the characters to their doom for a taste of emotional impact.

Project862006
07-27-2010, 05:20 PM
yeah but they are not devoid of it either i never watched his films and think this has no soul or heart or man these characters are 1 dimensional

Doctor Jones
07-27-2010, 05:27 PM
I always liked Snyder. Watchmen's Mars sequence was excellent. Also when Rorscach takes off his mask and shouts, "Do it." The Comedian's funeral was very well done, Patrick Wilson as Dan was more likeable in the movie too. Plus the opening scene.

Octoberist
07-27-2010, 05:31 PM
I think Zach is probably one of the best visualists in mainstream Hollywood

Punisher_MAX
07-27-2010, 05:33 PM
WHAT. THE. ****.

this looks so damn awesome. does anyone else feel like this should be an Anime?

dark_b
07-27-2010, 05:34 PM
I think Zach is probably one of the best visualists in mainstream Hollywoodany examples where he is the best?

you mean fantasy shots or camera work and editing?

Crook
07-27-2010, 05:38 PM
Composition and eye-candy. There's really no one like him in mainstream.

War Party
07-27-2010, 05:42 PM
I'm really digging with what I saw in that trailer. This is just a visual treat and sometimes that's just what I want to see. Can't ask for more than seeing sexy ladies kicking ass in a visually rich world. Like I said, sometimes that's just enough with a movie like this. Not all movies have to be like a Paul Thomas Anderson movie. Snyder has his style and he's very damn good at it.

Eklypze
07-27-2010, 05:43 PM
WOW!! WTF WAS THAT?!?! Seriously?!?! That trailer looked ****ing EPIC! But confusing as hell at the same time. Which is a great combo in my eyes. I'm officially and thoroughly excited for this now

Kane52630
07-27-2010, 08:11 PM
I think Zach is probably one of the best visualists in mainstream Hollywood

any examples where he is the best?

you mean fantasy shots or camera work and editing?

Composition and eye-candy. There's really no one like him in mainstream.

exactly, say what you want about his stories but visually? my god there is no one like him. Even in Dawn of the Dead the visually, camera work was amazing.

Happy Jack
07-27-2010, 08:12 PM
This looks like a Zach Snyder movie, as in all style and no substance. But then again conceptually it thankfully is closer to the all-action 300 than the character story heavy Watchmen, which he was not suited for in any way.

Majik1387
07-27-2010, 08:20 PM
Ugh god, more Snyder "substance" *****ing. It's a teaser trailer. If you weren't able to get the basic plot from it, you guys seriously have to jump off your high horse.

This is going to be a spectacular spectacle.

Happy Jack
07-27-2010, 08:29 PM
Ugh god, more Snyder "substance" *****ing. It's a teaser trailer. If you weren't able to get the basic plot from it, you guys seriously have to jump off your high horse.

This is going to be a spectacular spectacle.
I know what the basic plot is, and the trailer shows what the look and gist of it is. Going by your logic, calling it a spectacular spectacle after only seeing the teaser is just as baseless. :cwink:

Majik1387
07-27-2010, 08:40 PM
Action movies and musicals are often called spectacles. This movie has both, the trailer itself looked spectacular considering the story. Name one good live-action movie where it's managed to combine action, musical numbers, sci-fi mechas, fantasy settings complete with a fire breathing dragon into a 1950's period piece.

To not consider any of those spectacles is denial.:o

Happy Jack
07-27-2010, 08:48 PM
Spectacle it may be, but spectacular is in the eye of the beholder.

DACrowe
07-27-2010, 08:50 PM
I actually like Zack Snyder. I think he has an original style that is unique in Hollywood and makes visually addictive movies, every time.

However, I think his best film to date was the Dawn of the Dead remake. Because beyond the concept (Zombieocalypse and survivors trapped with zombies in mall), the screenplay by James Gunn was its own original thing and married with Snyder's style beautifully--creating a very fun and surprisingly fresh horror movie in a tired genre.

Watchmen is a very flawed film. He lives in the visuals, but that doesn't mean he can't do a film with substantive characters. I thought the characters in DOTD were endearing (or intentionally repulsive) and compelling. In Watchmen he understood how to develop them and create a nhilistic atmosphere to suffocate them in with more mid-20th century (boomers) pop culture references than you could shake a stick at.

But it just was, "too much." He could not get a handle o nt the enormous, confusing and ultimately, somewhat muddled narrative from the book as envisioned by Alan Moore. While it is easy to get away with on the page, on screen the flaws come out and at the end of the day, it is structured like a multilayered piece of literature (though some would argue whether it merits being considered true literature). Snyder either couldn't figure out how to condense this sea of information into a cohesive film or didn't want to for fear of the fans (and given how much they overreacted over a ****ing octopus, maybe he was right).

But Watchmen's best things beyond Haley's performance, as well as Crudup's, were Snyder's artistic flourishes. Like the entire opening credits montage that marries superheroes with American history from the 1930s to 1980s via Bob Dylan. His use of Nat King Cole's "Unforgettable" during a completely inserted and brilliant death scene for the Comedian (also not in the book), how he visualized Dr. Manhattan's birth, the addition of Dan for Rorschach's death, etc.

His style can be suffocating in a 3+ hour movie, but he did add things for the better...and he get rid of that stupid octopus...if only the cat-thing got ditched too.....




With all that said. This movie looks very meh to me. It looks like he is going where he needs to go to rebrandish his label or name with success in Hollywood. Watchmen was too dense for GA and was pretty much ignored the moment they realize a blue dick was in it. This movie looks big, dumb and most likely numbing. Just like his most successful film to date, 300. While I appreciate he is fetishizing girls now as opposed to barley-clothed men and that the near-fascist and racist undertones inherent in Millar's conceptualization of the story will be absent...I think it will be just like 300, ultimately (again without racism and homoerotica). By that I mean 20 minutes of awesome, followed by me being bored for the next 100 minutes.

But it will probably be his biggest hit or up there with 300, which his career needs. So, I understand.

Doctor Jones
07-27-2010, 09:21 PM
I still stand by what Snyder did on Watchmen. No matter what the man did, he would be damned for it.

Heretic
07-27-2010, 09:33 PM
Every now and then there should be a movie that is made just for teenage guys...this looks to be that movie. It has all the things that guys think are cool in a violent movie...and hot chicks in fetish wear (which is their favorite thing in anything).

It already appears to be a masterpiece for what it sets out to be.

Figs
07-27-2010, 09:45 PM
I still stand by what Snyder did on Watchmen. No matter what the man did, he would be damned for it.

I honestly believe he did better than most others could have done...especially reading and hearing about previous scripts.

Happy Jack
07-27-2010, 09:48 PM
I still stand by what Snyder did on Watchmen. No matter what the man did, he would be damned for it.
He probably did the best he could. The problem was that just wasn't good enough.

Project862006
07-27-2010, 10:04 PM
^ many disagree i stand by my claim i prefer it to TDK

i dont think anyone could of done it better every script past to present never had it in the 1980's till snyder made sure of it

DarthSkywalker
07-27-2010, 10:21 PM
I still stand by what Snyder did on Watchmen. No matter what the man did, he would be damned for it.

The film is devoid of the characters and their motivates. People talk of a faithful adaptation. You can argue whether it looked right, but you can't say that he got the story Watchmen, its characters, or its feel.

Visual styling is one thing. If it is all hallow though, what is the point.

^ many disagree i stand by my claim i prefer it to TDK

i dont think anyone could of done it better every script past to present never had it in the 1980's till snyder made sure of it

The Joker's speech to Harvey has more character and purpose then Snyder's 300 and Watchmen combined.

Project862006
07-27-2010, 11:03 PM
opinions i thought Watchmen had a lot of character development and emotion

and top notch performances

TheComicbookKid
07-27-2010, 11:46 PM
Well, considering what Snyder is symbolically linking Baby Doll's lobotomy to, I hope he has his understanding of character/narrative development down.

DarthSkywalker
07-28-2010, 12:18 AM
opinions i thought Watchmen had a lot of character development and emotion

and top notch performances

No opinion about it. If something isn't there, it isn't there.

Well, considering what Snyder is symbolically linking Baby Doll's lobotomy to, I hope he has his understanding of character/narrative development down.

Plenty of creative types think they know how to do symbolism. Doesn't mean they are good with it. The elegance of a Cauron or Nolan is replaced by the rusty steak knife approach.

Project862006
07-28-2010, 01:07 AM
yes opinion since i dont agree with you what so ever

AVEITWITHJAMON
07-28-2010, 07:31 AM
No opinion about it. If something isn't there, it isn't there.

Plenty of creative types think they know how to do symbolism. Doesn't mean they are good with it. The elegance of a Cauron or Nolan is replaced by the rusty steak knife approach.

There is opinion about it because me and many others think he got the characters in Watchmen pretty spot on, and there was plenty of substance and emotion in the movie as well, despite what you try and claim as fact when it clearly isnt.

Kane52630
07-28-2010, 10:21 AM
I honestly believe he did better than most others could have done...especially reading and hearing about previous scripts.

exactly. I wouldnt change a thing about the directing position, Zach was the man to bring in the look of Watchmen, even though there was a lack of a great screenplay.

See if Watchmen was a HBO mini series directed by Zach Snyder, that would be something to look at.

Ziggyman
07-28-2010, 10:30 AM
What Snyder gave us...was probably the best Watchmen movie we all coulda hoped for without going over 3 1/2 hours...

...and an HBO mini-series would have been amazing...

Monsieur Xavier
07-28-2010, 10:39 AM
Every now and then there should be a movie that is made just for teenage guys...this looks to be that movie. It has all the things that guys think are cool in a violent movie...and hot chicks in fetish wear (which is their favorite thing in anything).

It already appears to be a masterpiece for what it sets out to be.

Lol, stigmatizing much on your high horse ? :)

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree on the hot chicks in fetish outfit,I would have said retro-military-steampunk but fetish is shorter, also it is not a teenager prerogative to like hot chicsk in fetish outfit.

Excelsior.
07-28-2010, 10:52 AM
Every ounce of depth in Watchmen came from the comicbook. This movie will be as empty as 300.


I think Zach is probably one of the best visualists in mainstream Hollywood

Oversaturating the colour palette and copious amounts of Slow-mo =/= a good visualist.

JTStarkiller
07-28-2010, 10:55 AM
No opinion about it. If something isn't there, it isn't there.

Comments like this are why no one will ever take you seriously.

DocHoliday
07-28-2010, 11:52 AM
I am seriously pumped about the prospect of an original Zach Snyder work.

Project862006
07-28-2010, 01:05 PM
Every ounce of depth in Watchmen came from the comicbook. This movie will be as empty as 300.




Oversaturating the colour palette and copious amounts of Slow-mo =/= a good visualist.

and all the depth from 300 was in the comic buddy that i frank miller for you

and if thats all you think Zack's visual style is then you are sadly mistaken

PowersOfMind
07-28-2010, 01:06 PM
After seeing what Snyder did with Watchmen I can't wait to see what he does with Sucker Punch. I though Watchmen was one of the most engaging and visually stunning films I've seen in a long time. Considering the source material and how vast it is, Watchmen was great to me. The director's cut is even better.

Project862006
07-28-2010, 02:10 PM
how epic is this picture!!!
http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/zz3a3c6361.jpg

Kane52630
07-28-2010, 02:32 PM
HQ gifs made by me

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/2338/86593259.gif

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/8067/40606313.gif

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/3977/92988144.gif

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4791/31855064.gif

Crockett
07-28-2010, 02:51 PM
Pure awesomeness. This movie will be a visual feast.

S.A.A.D.
07-28-2010, 04:18 PM
HQ gifs made by me

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/2338/86593259.gif

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/8067/40606313.gif

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/3977/92988144.gif

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4791/31855064.gif

Gadzooks!!!!!!!!! :awesome::awesome::awesome::awesome:

darkseid26
07-28-2010, 04:31 PM
This movie looks hella awesome.

FaT_tONle
07-28-2010, 04:51 PM
HQ gifs made by me

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/2338/86593259.gif

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/8067/40606313.gif

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/3977/92988144.gif

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4791/31855064.gif

MORTAL KOMBAT!!! Duna duna duna duna dun dun... duna duna duna duna dun dun ... :dry:

Majik1387
07-28-2010, 04:55 PM
Mortal Kombat wishes it got that movie treatment.

Project862006
07-28-2010, 04:55 PM
exactly i think people are too into these realistic drama based films lately with realistic hand to hand fights like your dark knight & jason bourne, i go to movies to escape reality.This is my fix this is one of few movies that makes me think you have to see this in theaters for the spectacle alone.

i love me some fantasy films

dark_b
07-28-2010, 05:01 PM
i like both kind of movies.

Hunter Rider
07-28-2010, 05:02 PM
HQ gifs made by me

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/2338/86593259.gif



My favourite part of the trailer.

exactly i think people are too into these realistic drama based films lately with realistic hand to hand fights like your dark knight & jason bourne, i go to movies to escape reality.This is my fix this is one of few movies that makes me think you have to see this in theaters for the spectacle alone.

I think there is room for both, I hate it when a fad takes over, like after Matrix everyone was doing slow mo bullet stuff and wire-fu, then after the Bourne movies it was all high speed hand to hand and shaky cam, directors need to use their own imaginations.

Project862006
07-28-2010, 05:03 PM
i agree with you both i love both but sometimes people get too comfortable with 1 type directors and audiences alike

S.A.A.D.
07-28-2010, 05:45 PM
N/a

DarthSkywalker
07-28-2010, 07:39 PM
There is opinion about it because me and many others think he got the characters in Watchmen pretty spot on, and there was plenty of substance and emotion in the movie as well, despite what you try and claim as fact when it clearly isnt.

Give me an example. Even my favorite part of the film (The Mars scenes) hinge on knowledge you have going into the film. The character scenes lead nowhere and were disconnected. There is no indication of how these characters were molded into what they are, even though those scenes are suppose to be there. All you have are images from the comic, not their meaning. The big moments are begging for an emotional reaction from nowhere.

Watch the All Along the Watchtower scene. There is no quiet understanding between the character. All about recollection to the graphic novel. That is where the emotion of the scene is derived from, not the film itself. Which is why I think so many like it. They are filling in the gaps using their knowledge from the graphic novel.

Comments like this are why no one will ever take you seriously.

Because I seek your approval. :cwink:

TheWiseGuy487
07-28-2010, 08:13 PM
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/2338/86593259.gif


Almost looks like she's going super saiyan at the end there.

Paroxysm
07-28-2010, 09:30 PM
Wow, that trailer was sick. This movie looks crazzzzzy!

Leenie
07-29-2010, 04:18 AM
Hm. The teaser was ... Interesting.

Electrofarce
07-29-2010, 02:02 PM
opinions i thought Watchmen had a lot of character development and emotion

and top notch performances

Watchmen was superb and tied w/ TDK as best superhero movie IMO.

Project862006
07-29-2010, 05:23 PM
Great Interview With Zack and Deborah Snyder

Source:Cinematical

Cinematical: As awesome as the footage that you screened at Comic-Con looks, the real success of a movie like this is based on how effectively all of the spectacle works towards examining something larger. How did you make sure as you conceived each set piece that the overall story was going to have a deeper emotional or conceptual resonance?

Zack Snyder: A hundred percent! We basically had a second story already done and really what happened is all of the action sequences just end up servicing the other story. You have this dramatic story with these girls that is pretty compelling and pretty intense and pretty present – it doesn't rely on anything – but in their personal struggles they do need something. So we use those fantasy sequences to get those needs met, and the thing that's interesting about it is that it's such an intimate thing and such a small thing that they actually need that when you blow it out to this amazingly, ridiculously gigantic sequence, it has some kind of [larger significance]. Again, it's interesting and ironic to me, personally, that something so simple and so small in their own lives when you think about it because when you do fantasize about something, it can be [the case] that the scale is not an issue. So that's kind of how we treated it; it always in the end came back to the girls and where they were and what they needed.

Cinematical: Because these girls are in so many different outfits and have so many different personas, and you created them yourself, how careful did you have to be or how did you empower the actresses to make sure that the characters were themselves empowered and not just a sort of male fantasy figure?

Zack Snyder: Once the script was written, that was never really going to be a danger, because the girls, the characters were so important to me that I never wanted to belittle them or make them anything more than [people].


Deborah Snyder: And what's great about them and what's great about the action role that they're taking is that they can be badass and they can be fierce, but they also can cry and they can be sexy and beautiful and feminine – not necessarily masculine. That they are so dimensional, I think, is really important, and it was there and then the girls just brought even more to it as well.


Zack Snyder: We never shot it like an exploitation film; there's nothing about the film that – someone asked me before they'd seen any of the footage, "is this kind of like an exploitation movie? Is that like what this is? Because there are these sort of fetishistic-looking girls." And I was like, no, it's heart-attack serious. And they were like, "well, how do you do that?" and I said, I don't know, you just do it. But the truth is that in ways they're icon-busting or cliché-cracking rather than sort of embodying [them]. It's not like a Halloween costume where they dressed up like a schoolgirl, you know.

Cinematical: Something I wanted to ask you after Watchmen, which I thought was a pretty amazing achievement, was how conscious are you not of the tone, but the sort of levels on which something is meant to operate. For example, the thing about Watchmen is that it operates on this supremely sophisticated ironic level, providing the superficial gratification of a superhero movie even though it isn't about that at all. When you are conceiving these ideas, as you discussed with the fetishistic but empowering design of the women in Sucker Punch, do you tend to be very careful about building that into the design of the film, or is that something that sort of just comes out subconsciously through your creative process?

Zack Snyder: I think it's a combination of the two things because a movie is an ironic experience for me, because I know it's not real, and that never goes away for me. I was saying the other day that Toy Story 3 (http://www.moviefone.com/movie/toy-story-3/22984/main?icid=movsmartsearch) is a perfect movie to me because it never tries to make you think it's real – it's a cartoon – and yet you cry at the end and it's ridiculous because you have this experience of being completely tricked by your own brain that these characters are real, that they are alive and you care about what happens to them. In Watchmen, that was almost the main thing that I was going for – that tone of sort of irony on almost every level, whether it be history or it be our perception or superheroes, which is what I felt like Alan was doing anyway, but it was what I wanted to do with the movie. And I think Sucker Punch has a very similar point of view without being as much of a worldview; it's more about sort of the icons of sexuality and feminism and all of those things. It really sort of goes after those things more than it goes after, like I would in the past, some historical [portrait] of why we are who we are. This is more about why certain icons of sexuality persist, but I think also I love action and I love doing it, so I have this weird relationship with movies in that way. Like I'm always making fun of movies, but I love them more than anything.

Cinematical: Warner Brothers has such a unique ongoing collaboration with filmmakers. Obviously Kubrick (http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/stanley-kubrick/1222483/main?icid=movsmartsearch) was the gold standard back in the day, but you and Christopher Nolan have enjoyed a longtime partnership with them. What is it about that relationship that makes you want to continue to work with them as opposed to maybe shopping your projects around elsewhere?

Zack Snyder: Well, I think just the movie itself, Sucker Punch itself, the fact that it got made in the same –

Deborah Snyder: They greenlit Nolan's movie at the same time – two original ideas that were not like, oh, this is formulaic. They were bold ideas and for them to be like yes, this is what we want to do and we want to support our filmmakers, and we will take chances and strive to do something that's different, no other studio is doing that.

Zack Snyder: And hopefully by the same token, we try and make a movie that audiences would hopefully find different. If they're tired of the same old summer fare, there's something else. People can go, I'm going to sit down, the lights are going to go down, and that's going to be something else, and I think Warner Brothers respects that and they seem to have really been amazingly generous with us.

Deborah Snyder: Even with Watchmen – and even with 300. They had just done Troy (http://www.moviefone.com/movie/troy/15727/main?icid=movsmartsearch) and they were like, another sword and sandal movie?

Zack Snyder: They had done Alexander (http://www.moviefone.com/movie/alexander/16409/main?icid=movsmartsearch) too.

Deborah Snyder: They were like, we don't really need this. It's like sword and sandals fatigue and we were like, this is going to be something different. I don't think they really understood what it was until we started shooting.

Zack Snyder: And even then, it was all greenscreen. They were like, "what is this?" But they were like, okay, we trust that you know what you're doing and it's going to be cool.

Deborah Snyder: And that blind faith sometimes, you know, it's faith in the person, and it's a two-way street of mutual respect.

Zack Snyder: But we want to make them a great movie; I want them to make money. But it's just if they can use our points of view and our movie and sort of the way we do it and then the images that we create, if they can figure out a way that that works in the marketplace, then that's awesome and everyone wins.

NorsePrincess
07-29-2010, 06:35 PM
Look like the type of movie that'd appeal to 13 year olds, his core audience generally. "HOT CHIX, GUNS, SLOW MOTION ACTION, SAMURAIZ AN DRAGONZ!!!" It's like a bad novel you'd write when you're in your tweens.
Still, I'll give it a benefit of the doubt and watch it when it comes out.

Project862006
07-29-2010, 09:57 PM
anyone know how long this film is gonna be because i just did some research and Sucker Punch Started Filming in September of 2009 and wrapped in Feb. of 2010

that is 6 months of filming do films usually film that long

feels as long as he filmed Watchmen lol

I SEE SPIDEY
07-29-2010, 10:13 PM
It looks like fun to me.

Project862006
07-29-2010, 10:27 PM
Sucker Punch has some serious buzz
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7134/comicconboostdatatable.png

Trailer being released sure helped tho lol

http://www.collider.com/2010/07/29/comic-con-sucker-punch-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-tron-legacy-captain-america-the-first-avenger/

Sawyer
07-29-2010, 10:37 PM
Megamind is third and GL is last? Allow me to disregard that list. :o

Project862006
07-29-2010, 10:39 PM
only based on i phone searches tho

mega mind has a trailer so it has been building buzz for a bit unlike GL

anyways awesome Art based on the characters
http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-content/uploads/babydollposter.jpg
http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-content/uploads/blondieposter1.jpg
http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-content/uploads/amberposter.jpg
http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-content/uploads/rocketposter.jpg
http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-content/uploads/sweetpeaposter.jpg
http://www.shockya.com/news/wp-content/uploads/bunnymechimage.jpg

Crook
07-29-2010, 10:45 PM
Keep in mind Sucker Punch was below the radar up until that trailer. All those other movies that went down, have had their fair share of exposure for the past year. It only stands to reason that its interest rate skyrockets, especially since the footage whooped any other film at the Con.

Crockett
07-29-2010, 10:53 PM
anyways awesome Art based on the characters

Those art posters are nice, like the Sweet Pea's the most. They are official correct?

Project862006
07-29-2010, 10:56 PM
http://io9.com/5600089/check-out-some-gorgeous-sucker-punch-art-and-learn-why-zack-snyders-going-fantasy

apparently they were given out at comic con so yes i believe so

Crockett
07-29-2010, 11:04 PM
Would be cool if those posters are for sell, it's really a gorgeous artworks.

jaymes_e06
07-30-2010, 01:19 AM
Anyone else getting a live action Sailor Moon vibe from SP? I am and I think it's AWESOME!

louiebling$
07-30-2010, 01:43 AM
Babydoll especially

Red Mask
07-30-2010, 01:47 AM
Anyone else getting a live action Sailor Moon vibe from SP? I am and I think it's AWESOME!

The colors were too subdued to be Sailor Moon. I thought this film was follow up to "The Uninvited" remake.

AVEITWITHJAMON
07-30-2010, 06:57 AM
That interview posted above sounds great, I really like Snyder and his movies have got progressivly better IMO with WM being his best, but I really like the look of Sucker Punch, and hope its as good as it looks.

Kane52630
07-30-2010, 08:51 AM
Anyone else getting a live action Sailor Moon vibe from SP? I am and I think it's AWESOME!

I was thinking more of DOA meets Mortal Kombat meets Sailor Moon but yeah its looks like it

dark_b
07-30-2010, 09:14 AM
i am ashamded to say that i watched 4 ep or more from sailor moon when i was a kid. and i think babydoll looks like its inspired by that cartoon.

Monsieur Xavier
07-30-2010, 09:15 AM
Look like the type of movie that'd appeal to 13 year olds, his core audience generally. "HOT CHIX, GUNS, SLOW MOTION ACTION, SAMURAIZ AN DRAGONZ!!!" It's like a bad novel you'd write when you're in your tweens.
Still, I'll give it a benefit of the doubt and watch it when it comes out.

No offence but your misunderstanding of the SF/Fantasy community is as bad as your overused cliché.

KenK
07-30-2010, 10:27 AM
No offence but your misunderstanding of the SF/Fantasy community is as bad as your overused cliché.

Co-sign.

MOVIELORD101
07-30-2010, 10:50 AM
Co-sign.

Ditto.

Doctor Jones
07-30-2010, 06:50 PM
Man, one thing I always loved about Snyder was his enthusiasum for everything he talks about. It's good to see filmmakers talk about their films in the way he does.

zanos
08-01-2010, 09:38 AM
The film itself may be good for all anyone knows, but the film trailer was idiotic. No one is going to watch this. I can't believe it has an 85 million budget.

dark_b
08-01-2010, 09:44 AM
noone is going to watch this?

this movie is a wet dream for every fanboy and evey CGI artist .

Project862006
08-01-2010, 09:45 AM
Sucker Punch garnered the most buzz coming out of Comic con yes more than GL yes more than Thor

everyone loves the trailer buddy

so you are wayyyyyyy off

should they have cut a dramatic trailer lol yes that will get the kids

dark_b
08-01-2010, 09:50 AM
it could be that the buzz at comic con depends on the money shots.

sucker punch was a full trailer with full effects. GL showed nothing and thor had a trailer with only Asgard effects.

Project862006
08-01-2010, 10:01 AM
hot chicks too dont for the hot chicks:awesome:

Kane52630
08-01-2010, 10:02 AM
The film itself may be good for all anyone knows, but the film trailer was idiotic. No one is going to watch this. I can't believe it has an 85 million budget.

-.-

DarkSovereignty
08-01-2010, 11:16 AM
hot chicks too dont for the hot chicks:awesome:

what?

Kane52630
08-01-2010, 11:18 AM
I think he said, dont forget the hot chicks.

DarkSovereignty
08-01-2010, 11:20 AM
i see lol thanks.

ALP
08-01-2010, 05:16 PM
Now I have something to be excited over for the first quarter of 2011.

Is Warner Bros making this and the Guardian of Golagola?(whatever it is)

AVEITWITHJAMON
08-02-2010, 06:38 AM
Do this and Battle:Los Angeles both come out in March? If so, March next year is going to be great!

Kane52630
08-02-2010, 11:04 AM
Do this and Battle:Los Angeles both come out in March? If so, March next year is going to be great!

yeah, Battle: LA comes out on March 11th and Sucker Punch comes out on March 25th

Nivek
08-02-2010, 11:07 AM
March has been a great month for moderate and big budget new releases for a while.

Kane52630
08-02-2010, 11:08 AM
March has been a great month for moderate and big budget new releases for a while.

yeah the unofficial start of the summer imo

AVEITWITHJAMON
08-02-2010, 01:03 PM
yeah, Battle: LA comes out on March 11th and Sucker Punch comes out on March 25th

Awesome, hope this is the case here in the UK as well but more than likely one of them will come out about 2 months after, as is usual :csad:.

Nivek
08-02-2010, 01:52 PM
yeah the unofficial start of the summer imo

I really wish studios just stopped crowding the box-office with all the big budget films at certain times of the year and started spreading them out. This past May was just stupid...

Project862006
08-02-2010, 02:00 PM
March seems to be Snyder's Month

Kane52630
08-02-2010, 02:01 PM
lol it is, Dawn of the Dead, 300, Watchmen, and now Sucker Punch.

OptimusPrime114
08-05-2010, 09:18 AM
I just saw the trailer!

This is gonna be so cool!

Northern Lights
08-05-2010, 12:33 PM
This looks absolutely amazing. Snyder gets a lot of flack... but the guy can paint a pretty picture, to say the least. Not every film has to be deep and thought provoking.

Sometimes, it's good to just sit back, relax, maybe partake in some illegal substances... and just have your mind blown.

Crockett
09-01-2010, 11:36 AM
New pic.
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/7431/21511175.jpg

redhawk23
09-01-2010, 11:40 AM
:wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow:

JP
09-01-2010, 11:41 AM
Doesn't look great in still form.

Majik1387
09-01-2010, 02:20 PM
Yes it does.:huh:

TheComicbookKid
09-01-2010, 02:24 PM
Dragons(or the like) always look terrible.

JP
09-01-2010, 02:27 PM
Yes it does.:huh:
Ok, good for you. :huh::huh:

Dragons(or the like) always look terrible.
I suppose. Something about the still looks weird, but then again when I freeze frame the trailer it doesn't look too good either. It's one of those things that needs to be in motion.

Kane52630
09-01-2010, 04:24 PM
I suppose. Something about the still looks weird, but then again when I freeze frame the trailer it doesn't look too good either. It's one of those things that needs to be in motion.

yeah I agree, same thing with video games, if you freeze frame a picture from Halo or Batman Arkham Asylum it doesnt look good but when you play it is fantastic

JP
09-01-2010, 04:31 PM
Perfect analogy. :up:

chelo248
09-02-2010, 03:07 PM
Total Film Magazine October 2010


http://img174.imagevenue.com/loc133/th_55888_Total_Film_10_2010_page001_122_133lo.jpg (http://img174.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=55888_Total_Film_10_2010_page001_122 _133lo.jpg)http://img241.imagevenue.com/loc40/th_56010_Total_Film_10_2010_page002_122_40lo.jpg (http://img241.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=56010_Total_Film_10_2010_page002_122 _40lo.jpg)



:awesome:

JP
09-02-2010, 03:12 PM
:awesome:

AVEITWITHJAMON
09-02-2010, 05:56 PM
New picture looks great, this movie looks so up my alley its unbelievable!

Doctor Jones
09-02-2010, 06:24 PM
Browning, Hudgens and Gugino look the hottest. Damn.

GoblinWhirlwind
09-02-2010, 07:24 PM
Man, Baby Doll is hot. Sweet Pea looks good too.

That-Guy
09-02-2010, 11:14 PM
There is so much hotness in this movie, it's unbelievable. Even more unbelievable is that most (and hopefully all) of them can actually act.

Project862006
10-06-2010, 04:47 PM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/46913

2 Reviews even the some what negative one seems to dig it as well

i cant wait

DarkSovereignty
10-06-2010, 07:13 PM
can't wait for this.

Eelectro 2
10-06-2010, 08:10 PM
im excited for this film, i dont exactly kno the story but i saw the trailer and if its guna give me half the impression i got from the vibe of the trailer, i will enjoy it

hope snyder nails superman perfectly

Figs
10-06-2010, 08:38 PM
Nice pic! Who's the girl with the goggles on her head? :hrt:

Crockett
10-06-2010, 08:42 PM
Vanessa Hudgens.

TheComicbookKid
10-06-2010, 10:07 PM
The second reviews sounds like what I expected.

Project862006
10-06-2010, 10:34 PM
^ and the other review means nothing

TheComicbookKid
10-07-2010, 06:28 AM
^ and the other review means nothing

I'm not sure what you want me to say. I didn't say the movie will suck cause I haven't seen it. My mindset going in is closer to the second review. Doesn't mean I won't enjoy it like the first one.

King K
10-08-2010, 08:46 AM
I can't wait to see this. Goodness gracious those girls are hot.

redhawk23
10-08-2010, 08:59 AM
the first review echoes my thoughts when I first started seeing trailers and comicon stuff: "This looks like everything I ever drew in math class"

Which is AWESOME.

KenK
10-08-2010, 09:12 AM
the first review echoes my thoughts when I first started seeing trailers and comicon stuff: "This looks like everything I ever drew in math class"

Which is AWESOME.

It really is!

King K
10-08-2010, 10:19 AM
I'm a gay guy so this does absolutely nothing for me.

Would have been half excited if they throw in a bunch of cute hot guys or maybe stick to the original cast of Amanda Seyfried,Emma Stone....

but no, they have to cast that annoying nude photo scandal Vanessa Hudgens.....

anyways, the premise sounds cheesy and stupid, just a poor excuse to see girls in scantily clad outfits,

The whole trailer looks like an extended music video.

hopefully this bombs and flop like Catwoman , Elektra, Scott Pilgrim vs the World

Just stick to the Twilight series.

scifiwolf
10-08-2010, 10:28 AM
Just stick to the Twilight series.

:hehe:

Monsieur Xavier
10-08-2010, 12:25 PM
Total Film Magazine October 2010


[CENTER] http://img174.imagevenue.com/loc133/th_55888_Total_Film_10_2010_page001_122_133lo.jpg (http://img174.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=55888_Total_Film_10_2010_page001_122 _133lo.jpg)


:awesome:


My "favorit" ( look wise ) is Amber, the second on the left with the retro "military" outfit.

Majik1387
10-08-2010, 02:16 PM
I'm a gay guy so this does absolutely nothing for me.

Would have been half excited if they throw in a bunch of cute hot guys or maybe stick to the original cast of Amanda Seyfried,Emma Stone....

but no, they have to cast that annoying nude photo scandal Vanessa Hudgens.....

anyways, the premise sounds cheesy and stupid, just a poor excuse to see girls in scantily clad outfits,

The whole trailer looks like an extended music video.

hopefully this bombs and flop like Catwoman , Elektra, Scott Pilgrim vs the World
As a gay guy, this movie looks amazing to me. Great young talent, beautiful visuals, action scenes, musical numbers, and an actual original story.
I don't see this bombing at all.

redhawk23
10-08-2010, 02:22 PM
I'm a gay guy so this does absolutely nothing for me.

Would have been half excited if they throw in a bunch of cute hot guys or maybe stick to the original cast of Amanda Seyfried,Emma Stone....

but no, they have to cast that annoying nude photo scandal Vanessa Hudgens.....

anyways, the premise sounds cheesy and stupid, just a poor excuse to see girls in scantily clad outfits,

The whole trailer looks like an extended music video.

hopefully this bombs and flop like Catwoman , Elektra, Scott Pilgrim vs the World

to each their own, and money aside Scott pilgrim is nothing like Catwoman or Elektra.

GhostPoet
10-08-2010, 02:24 PM
Goggle girl. yummy.

Project862006
10-08-2010, 02:58 PM
Vanessa sure is yummy:hrt:
http://www.gotceleb.com/wp-content/uploads/celebrities/vanessa-hudgens/8211-8220-sucker-punch-8221-poster/vanessa-hudgens-sucker-punch-poster-01-530x953.jpg

Excelsior.
10-08-2010, 04:57 PM
I'm a gay guy so this does absolutely nothing for me.

Would have been half excited if they throw in a bunch of cute hot guys or maybe stick to the original cast of Amanda Seyfried,Emma Stone....

but no, they have to cast that annoying nude photo scandal Vanessa Hudgens.....

anyways, the premise sounds cheesy and stupid, just a poor excuse to see girls in scantily clad outfits,

The whole trailer looks like an extended music video.

hopefully this bombs and flop like Catwoman , Elektra, Scott Pilgrim vs the World


Well, there's always 300.

DarkSovereignty
10-08-2010, 05:11 PM
or the hand slap scene in predator.

Nightmare
10-08-2010, 09:29 PM
Vanessa sure is yummy:hrt:
http://www.gotceleb.com/wp-content/uploads/celebrities/vanessa-hudgens/8211-8220-sucker-punch-8221-poster/vanessa-hudgens-sucker-punch-poster-01-530x953.jpg

Ohhh sexy. :wow:

Passdom
10-08-2010, 09:36 PM
Emily Browning looks the hottest of them all imo.

chelo248
11-03-2010, 01:46 PM
http://i53.tinypic.com/191pb8.jpg


A Preview of Sucker Punch: The Set Visit (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=71315)(comingsoon.net)

SUCKER PUNCH Set Visit (Preview) (http://www.collider.com/2010/11/03/sucker-punch-set-visit-preview-image-zack-snyder/) (collider.com)
(http://www.collider.com/2010/11/03/sucker-punch-set-visit-preview-image-zack-snyder/)

Set Visit Preview: Zack Snyder’s Sucker Punch (http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/11/03/set-visit-preview-zack-snyders-sucker-punch/) (slashfilm.com)
(http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/11/03/set-visit-preview-zack-snyders-sucker-punch/)

Project862006
11-03-2010, 02:09 PM
New Trailer will be on Apple at 5pm

dark_b
11-03-2010, 02:36 PM
new trailer?

wooow isnt this to soon?

Project862006
11-03-2010, 02:40 PM
Sucker Punch comes out in about 4 months and watchmen 2nd trailer came out in November as well and both releases in March

makes sense

dark_b
11-03-2010, 02:46 PM
movie comes out in almost 5 months. makes no sense for a new trailer

Kane52630
11-03-2010, 02:49 PM
im sure they will be doing the same 3 trailer strategy they have been using for several years now, 1. teaser (almost a year before it comes out) 2. trailer #1 (midway before the movie comes out) 3. Trailer #3 (last 2 months before it comes out)

Project862006
11-03-2010, 02:52 PM
Bad Ass New Photo!!
http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/suckerpunch/images/background.jpg

chelo248
11-03-2010, 02:54 PM
i read somewhere new trailer will play with Due Date ( November 5), so maybe is true and today new trailer will be online.:awesome:

dark_b
11-03-2010, 02:55 PM
the new trailer will be out. ts on comingsoon.

TheComicbookKid
11-03-2010, 03:18 PM
Nice drawing with horrendous perspective work.

Can't wait for this trailer.

Doctor Jones
11-03-2010, 03:45 PM
Perspective? All I could think was how badass that looks.

GoblinWhirlwind
11-03-2010, 03:49 PM
I was turning through the channels last night, and on Spike I caught the last couple seconds of something for Suckerpunch... something fired a missile at Babydoll and she ducked under it, and it exploded behind her, silhouetting her in flames.

Maybe it was a preview of the trailer, or a tv spot. I don't get why there'd be any so soon though. I only caught that one shot, so I dunno. Awesome new picture too... damn this movie will be badass.

Hush
11-03-2010, 04:56 PM
I just heard Jon Hamm will be in this, if so, ticket bought.

GoblinWhirlwind
11-03-2010, 04:58 PM
He is, playing someone named High Roller.

Hush
11-03-2010, 05:03 PM
Well sweet, I loved the trailer for this and I support Snyders films because I like him. So yeah consider me being on the Sucker Punch bandwagon.

AVEITWITHJAMON
11-03-2010, 06:38 PM
Cant wait to see a new trailer for this, first one looked amazing so looking forward to seeing a bit more!

Project862006
11-03-2010, 06:47 PM
TRAILER IS HERE

http://trailers.apple.com/movies/wb/suckerpunch/suckerpunch-tlr2_480p.mov

looks phenomenal

TheComicbookKid
11-03-2010, 07:00 PM
That was something.

AVEITWITHJAMON
11-03-2010, 07:02 PM
^Any youtube links? Link wont work for me!

chelo248
11-03-2010, 07:02 PM
TRAILER IS HERE

http://trailers.apple.com/movies/wb/suckerpunch/suckerpunch-tlr2_480p.mov

looks phenomenal


wow, very cool! :awesome:

S.A.A.D.
11-03-2010, 07:17 PM
I liked the trailer alot,but the music,it's not bad. The choices for it doesn't make it strong enough,by just a bit.

Majik1387
11-03-2010, 07:17 PM
Looks amazing!:up:

Sawyer
11-03-2010, 07:18 PM
Looked like a cluster**** of nerdgasms.

And I like it. :up:

chelo248
11-03-2010, 07:41 PM
Zack Snyder's Sucker Punch Trailer


HOjrow6QmAw

Doctor Jones
11-03-2010, 07:42 PM
Goddamn.

:awesome:

Eddie Dean
11-03-2010, 07:53 PM
Zeppelin!

Speedball
11-03-2010, 10:31 PM
This movie looks like my imagination, but in physical form. I'm definitely going to see this movie.

Asgard
11-03-2010, 10:35 PM
Anyone know where I can buy a cheap pair of parachute pants?

Spideyfan93
11-03-2010, 10:40 PM
YOU WILL BE UNPREPARED

This might as well be an extreme understatement.

Figs
11-03-2010, 10:40 PM
He may not make the deepest films(then again he's mainly done adaptations)but god damn does he have an eye for great visuals.

rashad
11-03-2010, 10:45 PM
Kick ass trailer! I can only imagine how beautiful Superman will look! Amazing.

redhawk23
11-03-2010, 11:24 PM
Zeppelin!


And Silversun Pickups!

Its as if the marketing team went hey, how can we apeal exactly to that one guy in St. Louis....as if this movie isnt like every thing he ever drew in math class anyways. Oh yeah maybe we'll just market this with his two favorite bands!:awesome:

Mace Bloodstone
11-04-2010, 12:08 AM
This is all in her head?

Lone
11-04-2010, 01:17 AM
I can honestly say, without the slightest tinge of shame, that this is the first movie that I literally want to have sex with.:hrt::dry:

dark_b
11-04-2010, 01:39 AM
its nice that Snyder is uing CGI and all the effects possible to make an entertaining fantasy movie with an unique vision. a lot of anime shots in this movie. bravo Snyder.

this is 100% eye candy ,money shots and entertainment. if you watched the movie and you knew what it was about you have no right to complain. they are not tricking anyonre in the theater thinking that this is some deep movie.

for Sucker Punch and 300 i like Snyder. but i am very sad that the slow motion gallore will be used in superman.

LegendaryCaleb
11-04-2010, 02:11 AM
wow he taped the cemetary scene exactly the same way as the watchmen scene...kinda weird but the movie looks interesting...not my taste but im curious

nightwing06
11-04-2010, 05:29 AM
I love this trailer but it also has me hyped on what Snyder will do with Superman

dark_b
11-04-2010, 05:44 AM
wow he taped the cemetary scene exactly the same way as the watchmen scene...kinda weird but the movie looks interesting...not my taste but im curiouslets hope its only one angle and the lighting :woot:

Eggyman
11-04-2010, 07:04 AM
Wow. It's like Snyder is one of us. If Bay were good, he'd be called Snyder.

dark_b
11-04-2010, 08:15 AM
if Bay were good? you mean if he used less comedy and less flags? because i dont see a difference in quality between SNyder and Bay.

spider-neil
11-04-2010, 08:59 AM
WOW!!!

awesome trailer.

let's hope synder's plot and pacing matches his visuals this time because this is an area of his he is seriously lacking.

roll on superman :yay:

redhawk23
11-04-2010, 09:08 AM
if Bay were good? you mean if he used less comedy and less flags? because i dont see a difference in quality between SNyder and Bay.


I see where you're coming from and very much agree. I don't so much think its a quality difference really rather so much as Snyder has a bit more style, and also that hes really just a geek with millions of dollars worht of budget at his command. lol.

In other words both Snyder and Bay seem to think to themselves, "What would be really cool at this moment?" and then film it, the difference is Snyder is just more in line with what people here think of is cool.

Also Mila Ackerman sucked in Watchmen, but Meagan Fox makes her look like Merryl Streep.

Eggyman
11-04-2010, 10:22 AM
if Bay were good? you mean if he used less comedy and less flags? because i dont see a difference in quality between SNyder and Bay.

That's fair enough. Of course, we can have a difference of opinion.

JAK®
11-04-2010, 10:31 AM
if Bay were good? you mean if he used less comedy and less flags? because i dont see a difference in quality between SNyder and Bay.
Bay could never make Watchmen.

dark_b
11-04-2010, 12:18 PM
can someone make me a gif from the shot where the girl lands ?