Raimi and Dunst on Spider-Man 4!

[Eddie Brock]

From our wonderful front page here at SHH!:

ComingSoon.net/Superhero Hype! talked to "Spider-Man" franchise director Sam Raimi and star Kirsten Dunsthttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/inline_icons/mag-glass_10x10.gif (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/../news/topnews.php?id=5529#) today (Thursday) and we asked whether they would return for a fourth installment.

"Absolutely," said Raimi. "Yes, I just don't know what the future holds right now because it's so fresh and just having finished this film (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/../news/topnews.php?id=5529#) like a week ago. It's taken so many years to put together. My mind is an empty blank right now."

Good news! Also, Kirsten Dunst told us that she would do another film if both Raimi and Tobey Maguirehttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/inline_icons/mag-glass_10x10.gif (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/../news/topnews.php?id=5529#) returned.

Spider-Man 3 (http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=4663) opens in conventional theaters (http://www.superherohype.com/forums/../news/topnews.php?id=5529#) and IMAX on May 4.

[Gonking]

Well, after hear Tobey, Kristen and now Sam, I think we are definitely getting a fourth Spidey movie!!

[Venom 1988]

So basically hes made up his mind, he just doesnt know when he will do it right? Good :up:

[Eddie Brock]

So basically hes made up his mind, he just doesnt know when he will do it right? Good :up:
Now, all we need is Tobey to agree and Kirsten to have a change of heart and leave, and we'll be good!

Although, I have to side with Raimi. I do think it's ridiculous for people to be asking about this when the 3rd one hasn't even hit American theaters yet.

[GoldGoblin]

Did anyone tell Dunst that nobody wants her back.

[Eddie Brock]

Did anyone tell Dunst that nobody wants her back.
Apparently not. And saying that it's "Good news!" isn't helping, SHH!

[Venom 1988]

Did anyone tell Dunst that nobody wants her back.

lol :up:

[FaT_tONle]

I'm not putting more into this than what has been made out of it... only when we get conformation... which we are probably 6 months away from... I would imagine they would try to close the books on the characters Raimi brought in... but thats only Dr. Conners. Ofcourse they will add a side villain... of course no one knows where the franchise will go after that

[DocLathropBrown]

Just to stick it to all of you haters out there, I want Dunst back.

She's like the female George Bush. People would blame the Spanish Inquisition on Bush if they had the chance. Disliking a person is one thing, but Dunst and Bush get more lobbed at them than they deserve.

Besides. We all know the real reason people here don't like Dunst.... she's out of everyone's league on SHH!

[Shifty]

Just to stick it to all of you haters out there, I want Dunst back.

She's like the female George Bush. People would blame the Spanish Inquisition on Bush if they had the chance. Disliking a person is one thing, but Dunst and Bush get more lobbed at them than they deserve.

Besides. We all know the real reason people here don't like Dunst.... she's out of everyone's league on SHH!

Maybe in 2001.

http://64.111.216.18/ul/2099-kd.jpg

"The tangle of fame (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,257624,00.html) and fortune can also result in terrible tippers," said Eliza Pharrell, an assistant manager at a high-profile New York restaurant. "For instance, Kirsten Dunst came through and ran up a $233 bill and left without even the smallest gratuity."

http://64.111.216.18/ul/2258-kd32.jpg

http://64.111.216.18/ul/2174-kd7.jpg

http://64.111.216.18/ul/1491-kd40.jpg

Thanks to the good people at WWTDD.com and coining the nickname "Snaggletooth" for Dunst.

[DocLathropBrown]

Hey, I ain't saying she's the best looking. In fact, 90% of the time, she's not that great. But for most of the first Spider-Man and it looks like in Spider-Man 3, she's quite nice. Not to mention the way she looked at the Japanese press conference.

But still. If you think she's miscast, fine. If you don't think she's that great an actress, that's fine.

But people are just hating her for no reason, and it's childish.

[Shifty]

Hey, I ain't saying she's the best looking. In fact, 90% of the time, she's not that great. But for most of the first Spider-Man and it looks like in Spider-Man 3, she's quite nice. Not to mention the way she looked at the Japanese press conference.

But still. If you think she's miscast, fine. If you don't think she's that great an actress, that's fine.

But people are just hating her for no reason, and it's childish.

Her cocky comments that if she wasn't in Spider-Man 4 it would flop might be a good reason. She did include herself with Sam and Tobey but those two aren't even necessary either for Spidey 4 to be a success. They can plop out three more sequels and still make tons of money.

[Jasmine]

This news has made my day, now all we need is Tobey saying he's coming back.:up:

[The Caped Knight]

This has brought a huge smile to my face now all we need is to hear Tobey say he's in and were Good to Go .

[DocLathropBrown]

Her cocky comments that if she wasn't in Spider-Man 4 it would flop might be a good reason. She did include herself with Sam and Tobey but those two aren't even necessary either for Spidey 4 to be a success. They can plop out three more sequels and still make tons of money.

It may be a little on the cocky side, but it's fairly true. You forget... the rest of the world isn't made up of fanboys. To the general public, Dunst and Maguire ARE the characters, and Raimi's the guy who makes it all good.

Now, granted, it wouldn't be a flop, the general populace would think it unnecessary and lame to swap actors. She's right in that aspect. She's out in the real world, in the industry.... she knows these things. She was being purposely hyperboled. But, nothing like fanboys to turn against someone in an instant like a rabid wolf because they take things too seriously.

[Catman]

Maybe in 2001.

Agreed. She looks horrible these days. Back in 2001 she was hot!

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e329/MC03/dunst5.jpg

Like always....I'll blame Paris Hilton. :o

They can plop out three more sequels and still make tons of money.

UNLESS a Joel Schumacher takes over. Thats the problem. People get scared. First, you have Richard Lester taking over the Superman series in 1979. Then, Schumacher taking over the Batman franchise in the mid-`90s. People get worried when switches are made.

[blind_fury]

It may be a little on the cocky side, but it's fairly true. You forget... the rest of the world isn't made up of fanboys. To the general public, Dunst and Maguire ARE the characters, and Raimi's the guy who makes it all good.

Now, granted, it wouldn't be a flop, the general populace would think it unnecessary and lame to swap actors. She's right in that aspect. She's out in the real world, in the industry.... she knows these things. She was being purposely hyperboled. But, nothing like fanboys to turn against someone in an instant like a rabid wolf because they take things too seriously.
General audiences don't care about the actors as much as you think. Casino Royale made more than Die Another Day despite the fact that Brosnon had been playing Bond for last 5 movies. Batman Forever made far more than Batman Returns even though most people accepted Keaton as Batman.

A Spider-man movie can make just as much if not more with different actors and a talented director. Harry Potter has changed directors 3 times and the movies get better and better. Dunst is possibly the worst choice for Mary Jane and she's thinks she is a reason Spider-man movies make money. Give me a reason not to despise the conceited, snaggle toothed snob.

[FaT_tONle]

I'm all for recasting... but don't just bring one person back and let everyone else walk... if you can't resign all three then start from scratch... if either Tobey or Dunst walks both of them should stay out... if they get a new director and the same cast I can live with that... but that won't happen... so I like the idea of signing a new cast rather than losing more and more members of the original cast after every movie

[Catman]

General audiences don't care about the actors as much as you think. Casino Royale made more than Die Another Day despite the fact that Brosnon had been playing Bond for last 5 movies.

Thats different. People are used to watching different actors in the role of Bond. We've had six already!

Batman Forever made far more than Batman Returns even though most people accepted Keaton as Batman.

Thats because parents *****ing about the darkness and violence in Batman Returns hurt the box office!

A Spider-man movie can make just as much if not more with different actors and a talented director.

True, but people just get scared cause of what happened with the Superman and Batman franchise. We don't want another Lester or Schumacher!

if either Tobey or Dunst walks both of them should stay out

why? Batman Begins is getting a new Rachel but the same ol' Batman. The Back to the Future Trilogy had two Jennifers but one Marty!

[blind_fury]

Thats different. People are used to watching different actors in the role of Bond. We've had six already!

Thats because parents *****ing about the darkness and violence in Batman Returns hurt the box office!
In other words changing actors still didn't make a difference.



True, but people just get scared cause of what happened with the Superman and Batman franchise. We don't want another Lester or Schumacher!
That's why you get a talented director who understands the source material instead of a hack. Harry Potter has changed directors 3 times and the movies keep getting better and better.


]

[FaT_tONle]

why? Batman Begins is getting a new Rachel but the same ol' Batman. The Back to the Future Trilogy had two Jennifers but one Marty!

Batman is about Bruce Wayne though... Wayne's character is more important than Peter Parker's... its different... plus Tobey and Dunst had some chemistry together... it would be stupid if one left... also Rachel served her purpose but she definitely isn't a staple character in the mythos... its a lot different. Plus we are more used to seeing the two together.... Begins was only one movie and we only saw Bale and Holmes one time

[L0ngsh0t]

Batman is about Bruce Wayne though... Wayne's character is more important than Peter Parker's... its different... plus Tobey and Dunst had some chemistry together... it would be stupid if one left... also Rachel served her purpose but she definitely isn't a staple character in the mythos... its a lot different. Plus we are more used to seeing the two together.... Begins was only one movie and we only saw Bale and Holmes one time

This is incorrect, they are pretty much about the same, considering they both play title characters it would be tough to make a movie with out ether of them

[Shifty]

2001 she was hot; all the guys loved the upside down kiss in the rain. She must have passed her anti-hotness disease to Lohan. Red heads must carry it.

In other words changing actors still didn't make a difference.

That's why you get a talented director who understands the source material instead of a hack. Harry Potter has changed directors 3 times and the movies keep getting better and better.


Spider-Man, Harry Potter and POTC are the top franchises so they will get the best directors possible. Fox dicked around and then rushed X-Men 3 to get it out for last May on time, but if they waited could've gotten a better movie. Still made plenty at the box office. Sony isn't going to hand off the franchise to just anyone.

How many people noticed the two Jennifers in BttF? And people did not go see BttF II to see Jennifer, nor will people see TDK to see the new Rachel Dawes.

[MarvelXI]

If they use diferent cast I will se spider-man as a trilogy.

[FaT_tONle]

This is incorrect, they are pretty much about the same, considering they both play title characters it would be tough to make a movie with out ether of them

Maybe it is incorrect... but Tobey isn't the only Peter Parker out there... he can be replaced just like Bruce was many time over... I'd prefer they'd lock up a new cast so we are set for 4-6

[Venom 1988]

If there is a new cast I'd be fine with it. As long as they kept J.K Simmons :D

[Hartter]

Part of me wants Raimi to do the Hobbit, but I'd love to see him do 3 more Spider-Man flicks...

and, I think Dunst is a piece of ass still