Worst Special Effects

[hammerhedd11]

The top 10 worst special effects according to Empire May issue:
10. King Kong (1976)
9. The Mummy Returns
8. Slugs
7. Escape from L.A.
6. The Lost World (1960)
5. Predator
4. The Abyss
3. A Nightmare on Elm Street
2. Alien Resurrection
1. Plan 9 From Outer Space

Who do you guys think about this list? I hardly agree with any of this except number one. What are some other movies with terrible special effects?

[deathshead2]

5. Predator
4. The Abyss

WTF why are they on the list. They have really good FX.

[cryptic name]

Predator's effects are great. the predator looks like a real, living think in that movie.
that list sucks, there are plently worse special effects in movies, and the leap between the rest of them and Plan 9 is ridiculous.

[hammerhedd11]

5. Predator
4. The Abyss

WTF why are they on the list. They have really good FX.

Yeah, I don't know what they were smoking when they wrote that. The only thing they said was bad about the Abyss was when the alien ship comes out of the water.:whatever:

[Galactus]

Strange list. Didn't The Abyss win an Oscar for the special effects? What that movie is doing on this list is beyond me.

[Boom]

They can't be serious. ****ing PREDATOR?

Stupid asses.

[DorkyFresh]

the only one i agree with on there is Escape from L.A. they need to throw in UltraViolet and Resident Evil.

[Poetic Chaos]

Robocop 2.

[Mr. Credible]

ultraviolet for sure belongs on that list.

i thought alien ressurection had great special effects/cgi. i wonder where they pulled that list from.

[Mr. Credible]

Robocop 2.

no, no... Robocop 3.

ugh.

[cryptic name]

Robocop 2.

the stop motio in robocop 2 was really well done.

[Episode29]

How could they not include "Jason X"???

[Sloth7d]

Stupid list. The brothers Grim should easily be up there.

[DorkyFresh]

Catwoman should've definitely been up there...

[Sloth7d]

Why Catwoman? I saw nothing wrong aside from diverting so far from source material.

[Clerk]

How could they not include "Jason X"???


The making of Jason X is so sad, because the guys that did the effects look like they are pretty cool dudes who I'd like to get a beer with.

[DorkyFresh]

Why Catwoman? I saw nothing wrong aside from diverting so far from source material.
you kiddin' me? half of the film looked like video game sequences...

[Episode29]

The making of Jason X is so sad, because the guys that did the effects look like they are pretty cool dudes who I'd like to get a beer with.

Well I'm sure they've had a lot more free time to go out and get beers sine the release of that abomination...

[black_dust]

Well some of them are from the 70/60s! if you comapre them to todays films they are going to look ****.

Abyss what the hell. it paved the way for terminator 2 and that was freaking amazing!

I think they are confusing worst effects with dated effects :whatever:

[Dodger]

[QUOTE=hammerhedd11;11578509]The top 10 worst special effects according to Empire May issue:
10. King Kong (1976)- nope. nah...i cant do it. That robot monkey was awesome!
9. The Mummy Returns-yeah OK.
8. Slugs-never saw it.
7. Escape from L.A.- nope wrong.
6. The Lost World (1960)- never saw it.
5. Predator- go stab yourself you dum magazine.
4. The Abyss-James cameron man...can't hate.
3. A Nightmare on Elm Street- WTF? noooooo they did'ent!
2. Alien Resurrection-Stop wasting my time you dummy.
1. Plan 9 From Outer Space- it was bad..really bad. But I can't hate on Ed Wood.

list is garbage yo, give it to oscar. :grr:

[Sava]

the list is retarded.

[Lady Stormcrow]

I think they are confusing worst effects with dated effects :whatever:

I was about to post exactly the same thing.
I think, compared to other Empire Lists, this one is quite a poor idea, because effects that were great in the 40's will look awful now, even if they were really innovative at the time, which the Abyss definatly was.

[Golgo-13]

Like everyone else, i'm in ****ing awe that Predator made that list. It's effects hold up even to today, which says alot considering the F/X of the 21st century.

If anthing Clash of the Titans (which i love btw) and the old Sinbad movies of the 70's should be on that list.

[JackBauer]

this list is a f***in joke. Empire should know better.

[phoenix_force]

Maximum Velocity is the worst for me

[Bat Attack]

The top 10 worst special effects according to Empire May issue:
10. King Kong (1976)
9. The Mummy Returns
8. Slugs
7. Escape from L.A.
6. The Lost World (1960)
5. Predator
4. The Abyss
3. A Nightmare on Elm Street
2. Alien Resurrection
1. Plan 9 From Outer Space

Who do you guys think about this list? I hardly agree with any of this except number one. What are some other movies with terrible special effects?
Um? what? That list SUCKS! :down Why are the ones in bold even on it?

[nocomics]

the only one i agree with on there is Escape from L.A. they need to throw in UltraViolet and Resident Evil.

Heh, I wouldn't of thrown ultraviolet in there,besides the movie being a little weak,the special effects were good.

10. King Kong (1976)
9. The Mummy Returns
8. Slugs
7. Escape from L.A.
6. The Lost World (1960)
5. Predator
4. The Abyss
3. A Nightmare on Elm Street
2. Alien Resurrection
1. Plan 9 From Outer Space

Not sure what criteria they were doing. Don't seem like it was any set one at that. Theres alot of movies with worse special effects than those. The movies from the 60/70's are all not gonna have good special effects by today's standards.

[Bat Attack]

Why isn't 'Mission To Mars' on there?

[Hunter Rider]

Stupidest list in Empire history,Predator and the Abyss ?:huh::whatever:

[Bat Attack]

Do they realize A Nightmare On Elm Street was an independent film made for only $1 million?

[Furious Styles]

The special effects of Die Another Day stick out like a sore thumb

[DorkyFresh]

Heh, I wouldn't of thrown ultraviolet in there,besides the movie being a little weak,the special effects were good.

the suit changing color and a couple of the other effects were handled nicely but the effects involving heavy greenscreening were painful to watch...

Why isn't 'Mission To Mars' on there?

i didn't think the effects in that movie were bad at all. the effects in 'Red Planet' were worse...

[Sloth7d]

you kiddin' me? half of the film looked like video game sequences...
Meh, I saw nothing wrong with them.

But also I think Doom should be on that list, aswell as Brothers Grimm.

[Golgo-13]

The special effects of Die Another Day stick out like a sore thumb


Hell yeah. Bond para sailing...?:whatever: What a hack job!

[daywalker2007]

how in the f**k can James Cameron's "The Abyss" be on this list ???

This is a joke !!

empire is a joke !!!

abyss had groundbreaking special effects when it came out and even to this day its bloody awesome!

what a ridiculous list!

And Predator was awesome !
the effects were beyond top notch, they were astounding,

it must have been a person on crack who made this list

there can be no other reason!

[Duende Verde]

Lou Ferrigno's Hercules 1 & 2.

It's inexcusable that by the time this movies came out they could still be using cheaply made paper mache sets and props along with disco lights crappy costumes.

http://www.suchcoolstuff.com/ebaypics/c9556.JPG

http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j144/duende_verde/herculeslou1.jpg
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j144/duende_verde/herculeslou7.jpg
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j144/duende_verde/herculeslou4.jpg
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j144/duende_verde/herculeslou2.jpg
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j144/duende_verde/herculeslou5.jpg
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j144/duende_verde/herculeslou8.jpg

[theShape]

A Nightmare on Elm St had some pretty badass effects for its day. The girl being killed while rolling around on the ceiling? Johnny Depp being sucked into a bed? For such a cheaply made movie, those effects kick ass.

This list is whack.

[TheDeparted]

okay, seriously... tht is the worst list, in the history of lists... Predator has good effects, same with the abyss and alien R....

Many of the others, are just dated..... but were decent for their time....

What about Lost in Space the movie, or that one with the monsters ont he cruise ship..... with Jean Grey......

what about Superman the movie? or Star Wars for that matter... those are dated as well, but Empire won't touch those because they are classic... stupid magazine....

[vampireslayer97]

A Nightmare on Elm St had some pretty badass effects for its day. The girl being killed while rolling around on the ceiling? Johnny Depp being sucked into a bed? For such a cheaply made movie, those effects kick ass.

This list is whack.

You beat me to it. I don't understand why Jaws IV, Superman IV and A Sound of Thunder aren't on there.

[mclay18]

The effects for A Sound of Thunder were extremely lacking, but the CGI monsters were just awful (particularly the water eel and the baboon-lizards). The backgrounds and minor stuff were good, though.

I blame the lack of funds the WB parlayed into it. It seems like the WB only paid the company enough money to pay the cheapest special effects houses to complete it and not spend enough money on making it look better. Had the CGI been done by ILM, WETA or even Sony Pictures Imageworks, the CGI would've looked much better and less noticeable.

[TheDeparted]

anyone seen the langoliers??? I know it's a made for TV movie... but, by far the worst EVER...

[TheDeparted]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVBYZLNpKpU

[MSwift]

The Golden Child has some pretty bad special effects to go along with the bad movie.

[mclay18]

anyone seen the langoliers??? I know it's a made for TV movie... but, by far the worst EVER...

Oh god, yes. Interesting movie, but awful special effects.

[Orko Is King]

Why isn't Anacondas on here?

[xwolverine2]

anacondas has great fx to this day^

A sound of thunder was a great movie..... but with horrible fx :(

[DarthDaveBanner]

BTW.....I sort of read the article and its not so much saying these films have awful effects as a whole but rather are describing certain effects in each film.

Like for example Predator makes the list due to less than convincing effects when Carl Weathers arm is blasted off.

[swifty]

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

AND ABYSS

:cmad: :cmad: :cmad: :cmad: :cmad:

WTF!!!!!!!

[swifty]

BTW.....I sort of read the article and its not so much saying these films have awful effects as a whole but rather are describing certain effects in each film.

Like for example Predator makes the list due to less than convincing effects when Carl Weathers arm is blasted off.


whomever wrote that article was an idiot, I didn't see nothing fake with Weather's arm being blown off, infact they did a terrific job....very convincing if you ask me like the rest of the movie....GOD I HATE THAT LIST AND THE PERSON REPONSIBLE FOR IT.

[Golgo-13]

I think Sam Jones 'Flash Gordon' should be up there too.

[Secret_Riddle]

10. King Kong (1976)
Fair game..they could have been a lot better..even for 1976

9. The Mummy Returns
meh...i have seen a lot worse in recent movies like ultraviolet

5. Predator
And the list loses credebility

4. The Abyss
uhh...wow.

3. A Nightmare on Elm Street
For a low budget cult horror..they were great

2. Alien Resurrection
saying as how the effects were better then the first 3...its just the film that sucked.

[xwolverine2]

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

PREDATOR

AND ABYSS

:cmad: :cmad: :cmad: :cmad: :cmad:

WTF!!!!!!!

A STORM CLOUD!?

[The Immortal!]

The effects for A Sound of Thunder were extremely lacking, but the CGI monsters were just awful (particularly the water eel and the baboon-lizards). The backgrounds and minor stuff were good, though.

I blame the lack of funds the WB parlayed into it. It seems like the WB only paid the company enough money to pay the cheapest special effects houses to complete it and not spend enough money on making it look better. Had the CGI been done by ILM, WETA or even Sony Pictures Imageworks, the CGI would've looked much better and less noticeable.

Actually, the production company (Franchise Pictures) went under during post production. Not to mention floods on the set during filming. I guess WB didn't care for the movie and didn't want to finish the CGI when the production company went under. Wouldn't blame them. Almost every movie they released in theaters from the production company were complete disasters in terms of box office. Battlefield Earth, Driven, Get Carter remake, etc.

Also the budget was either 53 million or 80 million. How much of that was used is unknown. I'm guessing under 40 million was used before the company folded.

A a little known fact. If you go to the site for UFO films (or whatever it's called) you can view their demo reel. Two brief shots of the movie is in it. The point? UFO mainly works on Sci-Fi Channel tv flicks. Ouch.

EDIT -- http://www.ufofilm.com/ufovfx.html

[Storm22]

I definitely agree that Catwoman should be included on that list - the movie is practically a computer game! Also Superman 4's unfinished FX stand out like a sore thumb.

[xwolverine2]

I definitely agree that Catwoman should be included on that list - the movie is practically a computer game! Also Superman 4's unfinished FX stand out like a sore thumb.

i actually liked catwomans fx.... on par with spideys if you ask me(not that spideys was all that good but you know)...

ULTRAVIOLET on the other hand.....lol:woot:

[Storm22]

i actually liked catwomans fx.... on par with spideys if you ask me(not that spideys was all that good but you know)...

ULTRAVIOLET on the other hand.....lol:woot:

On par with Spiderman 1's fx maybe, that scene where tracksuit spidey runs down the alley and starts climbing the wall and jumping round the place has very bad fx.

I haven't seen Ultraviolet, was it really bad?

[xwolverine2]

On par with Spiderman 1's fx maybe, that scene where tracksuit spidey runs down the alley and starts climbing the wall and jumping round the place has very bad fx.

I haven't seen Ultraviolet, was it really bad?

everyone hates ultraviolet.
the fx ARE horrible...

but it was fun... if you like anime and turn the volume down.

[Apollo]

predator??? the mummy returns??? what are they on crack?? they didnt even include spykids and shark boy and lava girl!


http://www.impawards.com/2001/posters/spy_kids.jpg

http://www.christianmoviesdirect.com/catalog/images/SpyKids2LG.jpg

http://www.impawards.com/2003/posters/spy_kids_3d_game_over.jpg

http://imagesource.allposters.com/images/pic/153/1229924~The-Adventures-Of-Shark-Boy-And-Lava-Girl-In-3-D-Posters.jpg

WORST VISUAL EFFECTS EVER!!!!!

[JackBauer]

predator??? the mummy returns??? what are they on crack?? they didnt even include spykids and shark boy and lava girl!


dude, the FX on that sucked big time. I wouldn't say it's one of the ten worst ever, but it's not that absurd. that big wave thing was a lot faker than the sand wall in the first Mummy (now THAT was awesome) and the Scorpion King at the end was just ridiculous.

[Apollo]

anyone remember the devil in the movie SPAWN? the scene where he goes in hell and meets the devil? that was horrible! it looked really bad. It looks like video game graphics out of Nintendo 64

[hammerhedd11]

anyone remember the devil in the movie SPAWN? the scene where he goes in hell and meets the devil? that was horrible! it looked really bad. It looks like video game graphics out of Nintendo 64
Oh, my that was terrible. I scoff at the article in Wizard where they say Spawn had good special effects.:wow:

[Speedball]

This list is BS!
The Mummy Returns, Predator, The Abyss, and Alien Resurrection have awesome effects.
Where's Power Rangers? I love the film, but I could have done the effects for that film with my eyes closed.
Where's Clash of the Titans too?

[mclay18]

Where's Power Rangers? I love the film, but I could have done the effects for that film with my eyes closed.
Where's Clash of the Titans too?

Oh, yes Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie's CGI has aged quite badly, even in 1997 it was dated. Particularly the MegaZord vs. giant Ivan Ooze in the finale. But it was fun, in an arcade-game sort of way. And yes, I liked the movie too for all its cheesy goodness.

I think the reason why people overlook Clash of the Titans is because it was noted for its stop-motion effects and they don't want to diss the guy who did all that (I can't spell his name properly, it's Ray H-something).

[redmarvel]

I was about to post exactly the same thing.
I think, compared to other Empire Lists, this one is quite a poor idea, because effects that were great in the 40's will look awful now, even if they were really innovative at the time, which the Abyss definatly was.

Agreed. What they need to do is "level the playing field". Compare movies within a given year, instead of across time. Which movies had the WORST special affects last year?

Comparing the effects of a movie made in 1976 to one made in 2006 makes no sense whatsoever.

[the_ultimate_evil]

the list has been taken out of context, though i dont agree with a lot of the perticular entrys they are talking about certain scenes rather than the film

eg nightmar on elm makes it for the crappy ending with the dummy and window

[amazingfantasy15]

Spawn is a good example of horrible effects, not just the Devil, but Violater look pretty awful as well, his transformation was embarassing.

Another example of poor effects is the Terminator, the movie is great plot wise, but some of those effects were awful, the scene where the Terminator cuts his eye out couldn't have looked faker if they tried. Don't get me wrong the movie is incredible, but the effects were laughable at times.

Where was the 1st Harry Potter on that list? Off the top of my head horrible CGI effects include the Troll, Neville on the broomstick and Fluffy the three headed dog. That movie should have had better effects.

[hammerhedd11]

the list has been taken out of context, though i dont agree with a lot of the perticular entrys they are talking about certain scenes rather than the film

eg nightmar on elm makes it for the crappy ending with the dummy and window

How did I take that out of context?

[Golgo-13]

As much as i love this movie, the special effects were aweful.

http://members.tripod.com/~CARIART/FlashSplash.jpg

[the_ultimate_evil]

How did I take that out of context?

cause the way you posted it, the list comes across as saying the effect of the enitre film listed sucks where as the list was just show casing certain scenes

[A.J.Rimmer(BSC)]

Where was the 1st Harry Potter on that list? Off the top of my head horrible CGI effects include the Troll, Neville on the broomstick and Fluffy the three headed dog. That movie should have had better effects.

The CGI stuntmen, fair game, but Fluffy was great IMO.

[KingOfDreams]

Are they even taking into account the time period some of these movies were made?

[Mr. Credible]

Spawn is a good example of horrible effects, not just the Devil, but Violater look pretty awful as well, his transformation was embarassing.

Another example of poor effects is the Terminator, the movie is great plot wise, but some of those effects were awful, the scene where the Terminator cuts his eye out couldn't have looked faker if they tried. Don't get me wrong the movie is incredible, but the effects were laughable at times.

Where was the 1st Harry Potter on that list? Off the top of my head horrible CGI effects include the Troll, Neville on the broomstick and Fluffy the three headed dog. That movie should have had better effects.

dude, for the time, the cgi doubles in that movie were actually pretty good, and the troll and fluffy (especially fluffy) both looked great.

there are a lot worse special effects out there than harry potter.

[amazingfantasy15]

dude, for the time, the cgi doubles in that movie were actually pretty good, and the troll and fluffy (especially fluffy) both looked great.

there are a lot worse special effects out there than harry potter.

I like the movie, I bought it on DVD, but even the first time seeing it, those three special effects sequences didn't work for me. Might just be me.

[Agent Thermal]

I suppose "Jurassic Park" and "Gremlins" are numbers 11 and 12, had the editors let them go that far.:o

[I SEE SPIDEY]

The Abyss and Predator shouldn't be on that list...The Mummy Returns is up for debate, because I'll tell you I watched it a bit ago and it's SFX didn't hold up too well.

How come Spawn isn't on the list? What about LXG? That movie had some of the worse FX well...ever.

[hammerhedd11]

Tranporter 2 had terrible CGI.

[livrule]

Star Trek 5: The Final Frontier .... should be there, terrible effects .... NOT dated just bad.

Recently I would say The Matrix Reloaded let me down .... The multiple Smiths did not work.

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

What the original poster didnt include in the list was that it was only specific scene's in those movies, in the Abyss it was the alien ship coming out of the water, in Predator it is when Carl Weathers arm is blown off and you see his proper arm under the prosthetic.

Its just specifice moments in movies, not the whole movies.

[Mr. Socko]

Abyss, Predator, and Mummy on the list of worst special fx of all time?

WTF...

[Mr. Socko]

predator??? the mummy returns??? what are they on crack?? they didnt even include spykids and shark boy and lava girl!


http://www.impawards.com/2001/posters/spy_kids.jpg

http://www.christianmoviesdirect.com/catalog/images/SpyKids2LG.jpg

http://www.impawards.com/2003/posters/spy_kids_3d_game_over.jpg

http://imagesource.allposters.com/images/pic/153/1229924%7EThe-Adventures-Of-Shark-Boy-And-Lava-Girl-In-3-D-Posters.jpg

WORST VISUAL EFFECTS EVER!!!!!

LMAO! The special effects for Spy Kids 2 had CG that looked 2D. It was so terrible.

Then again, Robert Rodriguez's CG company only consists of 11 artists.

[black_dust]

Check this link out (some not to do with effects) its funny as hell!!

http://break.com/index/worst-movie-scenes-ever.html

[hammerhedd11]

Check this link out (some not to do with effects) its funny as hell!!

http://break.com/index/worst-movie-scenes-ever.html

:woot: OMG that was hilarious!!! LOL!
"What d'ya say i take you home and eat your p***y?"

[black_dust]

:woot: OMG that was hilarious!!! LOL!
"What d'ya say i take you home and eat your p***y?"

I liked the Troll 2 one.

"OooooHHHHH MYYYYYYYY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDD!!!!" Cracks me up every time.

[Agent Thermal]

http://break.com/index/worst-movie-scenes-ever.html

That horse sliding under the truck is just classic avatar-worthy stuff to me. :D I just wish I had the means or know-how to do just that...:csad:

[the a1ant]

That list is horrible, imo, lol. They had many bad choices.

Mortal Kombat Annihilation had some of the worst effects I've ever seen.

I agree with The Mummy 2 though. There were so many, bad cartoony effects. The first film was a lot better in terms of visuals.

anyone remember the devil in the movie SPAWN? the scene where he goes in hell and meets the devil? that was horrible! it looked really bad. It looks like video game graphics out of Nintendo 64

Oh God yes, those were terrible effects. I had to look away from the screen for those scenes, lol.

[<(o_o)>]

They forgot the Star Wars movies.

[black_dust]

They forgot the Star Wars movies.

This falls under the dated effects category back in the day they looked pretty sweet

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

With out those star wars effects, people wouldn't have ILM.

so basically, if you have mentioned SW, you're talking out of your bottom.

[Symbiotic]

Ultraviolet has really bad CGI, imo.

[C.F. Kane]

Spice World


They used wooden toys to show a bus jumping over Tower Bridge as it was being raised.

[Kevin Roegele]

Superman IV. End of conversation.

[demitri_vampiro]

it depends on when the movie was made. sw episodes 4,5,6 may look cheesy now, but back then the effects were awesome. episode 1 on the other hand had some bad cgi

[Qwerty©]

it depends on when the movie was made. sw episodes 4,5,6 may look cheesy now, but back then the effects were awesome. episode 1 on the other hand had some bad cgi
No it didn't.

[fallenAngel]

predator??? the mummy returns??? what are they on crack?? they didnt even include spykids and shark boy and lava girl!




http://www.christianmoviesdirect.com/catalog/images/SpyKids2LG.jpg

WORST VISUAL EFFECTS EVER!!!!!

I haven't really seen much of this movie. But I think they were going for a sinbad retro look. That and it's Robert Rodriguez, who makes all of his movies on relatively small budgets.


and A sound of Thunders effects were terrible. They looked like a made for tv movie on the Sci fi channel.

[fallenAngel]

That horse sliding under the truck is just classic avatar-worthy stuff to me. :D

That was awesome.

And I personally think that the Star Wars effects still hold up. Empire at least has great effects.

[Rezzo]

Just about all the movies you see on the SciFi Channel

[Lazlo Panaflex]

The Star Wars prequels for relying too much on digital actors and fake CGI backgrounds.

Superman 4 for the obvious matte lines around Supes.

[The Immortal!]

and A sound of Thunders effects were terrible. They looked like a made for tv movie on the Sci fi channel.

http://www.ufofilm.com/ufovfx.html

The demo reel isn't working, but there are two shots from the movie (ASOT) that are in the reel. UFO does CGI for some Sci-Fi films.

A Sound of Thunder had 3 faults against it.

1. Floods on the set back in 2002.

2. Franchise Pictures (production company) made a lot of films....that did badly in theaters for Warner.

3. They went under during Post and Warner decided to cut it's loses. It only went to theaters because Warner was obligated to do so.

http://imdb.com/title/tt0318081/trivia

[Honey Vibe]

When we watch Spider-Man, I'm so disgusted with the scene where Peter is leaping across buildings for the first time, I simply rise and leave the room.

[Honey Vibe]

That horse sliding under the truck is just classic avatar-worthy stuff to me. :D I just wish I had the means or know-how to do just that...:csad:
Just ask the boys in the Avatar Thread to make it for you. All they need is the link.

[Agent Thermal]

Just ask the boys in the Avatar Thread to make it for you. All they need is the link.

Thanks for the heads up (I need to get out more - stuff like this should be common knowledge)! But alas, my post count does not allow me to have a decent-size avatar - that particular movie sequence wouldn't show up too well in a 50 x 50 square.:( I'll just bide my time until then...:ninja:

[PhotoJones]

When we watch Spider-Man, I'm so disgusted with the scene where Peter is leaping across buildings for the first time, I simply rise and leave the room.

Well, it is bad CGI but is it really something to get disgusted over?

[That-Guy]

xXx: State of the Union. EVERYTHING in that movie looked completely fake. I still curse the day I watched that crap.

[p4poetic]

The 2005 TV Hercules movie. The props were so bad I couldn't believe my eyes. It looked like a school play. They made 1995 Hercules The Legendary Journeys five tele-movies seem like they had the budget of Troy.

[Honey Vibe]

Well, it is bad CGI but is it really something to get disgusted over?
Yes, yes it is.
My blood pressure rises and everything. I can't believe they didn't force the CGI unit they hired, to either re-work that or not get paid.

[Qwerty©]

^

It's really not that bad. Most of the movies in this thread would dream of having effects like that.

[Hunter Rider]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pURSC5FYYfU

[BLACK-SPIDEY]

the lost world???? okay, YOU HAVE TO BE ****ING JOKING ME!!!!
what about DBE? huh?