PDA

View Full Version : Number of Republicans in U.S. Increases in December to Two-Year High


StorminNorman
01-01-2008, 07:11 PM
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/party_affiliation/partisan_trends

Tuesday, January 01, 2008


The number of Americans who consider themselves to be Republicans jumped nearly two percentage points in December to 34.2%. That’s the largest market share for the Republican brand in nearly two years, since January 2006 (see history from January 2004 to present). (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/party_affiliation/party_affiliation/summary_of_party_affiliation)


At the same time, the number of Democrats fell to 36.3%. That’s down a point compared to a month ago (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america_archive/partisan_trends/partisan_identification_37_4_democrat_32_5_republi can). During 2007, the number of Democrats has ranged from a low of 35.9% in July to a high of 37.8% in February.
These results are based upon tracking surveys of 15,000 adults per month. The margin of sampling error is less than one percentage point, with a 95% level of confidence. Please keep in mind that figures reported in this article are for all adults, not Likely Voters.


Back in May, the Republicans fell to their lowest level of party identification of the past four years (30.8%). Then, the immigration debate raged in Congress and some Republican legislators helped defeat an unpopular Senate immigration bill (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/immigration_bill_failure_proves_rasmussen_s_first_ law_of_politics). Republicans have gained ground in five of the seven months since then. But, the gains in December—1.7 percentage points—matched the total gains for the previous six months combined.
The December gains for the GOP coincide with increased public confidence in the War on Terror (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/war_on_terror/war_on_terror_update). It’s interesting to note that this did not improve President Bush’s Job Approval (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/president_bush_job_approval) ratings while helping the Republican Party overall.


The gap between the parties now shows a 2.1 percentage point advantage for the Democrats. That’s the smallest advantage for the Democrats since January 2006. It represents a dramatic change from the previous five months when the gap favored Democrats by a margin between 4.5 and 4.9 percentage points each and every month.


A year ago at this time, the Democrats had a 6.9 percentage point advantage as they prepared to formally take control of Congress following their victories in Election 2006. It remains to be seen whether the Republican gains can last, but it is startling to note that the Democrats have lost two-thirds of the partisan advantage since taking control of Congress.


Democrats continue to have a significant advantage on ten key issues tracked by Rasmussen Reports (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues/trust_on_issues). Nancy Pelosi's Party also holds a solid lead on the Generic Congressional Ballot (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_ballot/generic_congressional_ballot). Pelosi herself is viewed favorably by 38% and unfavorably by 51% of voters nationwide. At her peak, shortly after becoming the first woman Speaker of the House, Pelosi was viewed favorably by 49% of voters.



Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_service_description) Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.


These results are based upon tracking surveys of 15,000 adults per month. The margin of sampling error is less than one percentage point, with a 95% level of confidence.

Spider-Bite
01-01-2008, 07:55 PM
It's a lie. too many republicans have become swing voters and too many swing voters have become democrats. Everybody knows this.

The Senator
01-01-2008, 07:56 PM
It's a lie. too many republicans have become swing voters and too many swing voters have become democrats. Everybody knows this.

Source??

Matt
01-01-2008, 07:56 PM
I'll say this, the Republican Party's get out the vote movement is never as well publicized as the Democrats, but it is always about ten times better. I mean, look at 2004. They had the AMISH voting for them for pete's sake. Its really no suprise to me that there are more registered Republicans as the 2008 primaries draw near.

Captain_BluTac
01-01-2008, 07:58 PM
the thing about Republicans is if you drop the re your just left with a load of drunks

StorminNorman
01-01-2008, 08:28 PM
It's a lie. too many republicans have become swing voters and too many swing voters have become democrats. Everybody knows this.

That doesn't make it a lie:huh:

Also, your assessment is an incorrect one, especially in the South.

rdh007
01-01-2008, 08:32 PM
This is simply further proof of the decline of Western Civilization.

Arkady Rossovich
01-01-2008, 08:50 PM
I could also see it as a one sided news post.Sometimes these people would tweak facts to give the party they like an edge,the Republicans are loosing numbers since the Democrats now control the Government except the Presidency.

StorminNorman
01-01-2008, 09:15 PM
This is simply further proof of the decline of Western Civilization.
:whatever:

Because the Democratic party is better?

rdh007
01-01-2008, 10:47 PM
Not necessarily. They're just more...correct.

StorminNorman
01-01-2008, 10:49 PM
Not necessarily. They're just more...correct.

Hardly. The Republican Party platform is generally (IMO) the far more sensible.are Small government > Large government.

If you are referring to the actual practices - even then, the democrats are just as corrupt, out of touch and overall horrible.

If it wasn't controlled by evangelical christians it would be golden.

One day....one day....

Superman4ever
01-01-2008, 11:11 PM
^^ that's why we need Paul.

hippie_hunter
01-01-2008, 11:17 PM
It's a lie. too many republicans have become swing voters and too many swing voters have become democrats. Everybody knows this.

I can see this story as beleivable on account that I think most people are now seeing both Republicans and Democrats as two sides on the same coin yet both share the same levels of incompetency. So people will end up sticking with the party that best suits their beliefs instead of the supposed "good" and "evil" party that many people tended to believe in 2006.

I'm sorry to tell you this, but Americans are pretty much as pissed off as the Democrats simply because they pretty much have been unable to get anything done due to Bush's unwillingness to work with them (and vice versa). Most Americans blame both parties for American politics for being f**ked up. Sure the Democrats had the swing voter advantage in 2006, but they lost a lot of it now. 2008 is going to be an interesting year for sure.

The seeds of a new major party developing are out there, hell the fields have even been plowed and the seeds have been planted. It just needs the motivation to sprout and grow.

hippie_hunter
01-01-2008, 11:19 PM
I could also see it as a one sided news post.Sometimes these people would tweak facts to give the party they like an edge,the Republicans are loosing numbers since the Democrats now control the Government except the Presidency.

You think that just because the Democrats have the majority of Congress that means that the Republicans are losing numbers?

Absoutely not! This country is still really pretty much even when it comes to Republicans and Democrats with moderate independent swing voters being the majority of the voting populace.

bullets
01-01-2008, 11:20 PM
I dont think either party is fully in-line with my beliefs.however i will go with the candidate that seems most trustworthy.

VICTORVONDOOMX
01-01-2008, 11:21 PM
Everybody wants to be able to vote for Ron Paul. Who wouldn't want to vote for a "politician" that both read and understood the Constitution?

So rare.

Lighthouse
01-01-2008, 11:25 PM
I'll say this, the Republican Party's get out the vote movement is never as well publicized as the Democrats, but it is always about ten times better. I mean, look at 2004. They had the AMISH voting for them for pete's sake. Its really no suprise to me that there are more registered Republicans as the 2008 primaries draw near.

Republicans go after the older generations, and Democrats the young people. The old people vote, and the young don't.

hippie_hunter
01-01-2008, 11:31 PM
I'll say this, the Republican Party's get out the vote movement is never as well publicized as the Democrats, but it is always about ten times better. I mean, look at 2004. They had the AMISH voting for them for pete's sake. Its really no suprise to me that there are more registered Republicans as the 2008 primaries draw near.

I've always prefered the non-aligned approach in trying to get people to vote.

When I did a voter registration drive with someone. I kept on saying just choose who you want to be or if you don't know enough about them, just don't affiliate with either of them. The other person kept on saying "Go Republican!"

Lets just say that my persuasion (one Democrat and the rest non-affiliated) was far better than hers (zero) :cwink:.

Matt
01-01-2008, 11:34 PM
I've always prefered the non-aligned approach in trying to get people to vote.

When I did a voter registration drive with someone. I kept on saying just choose who you want to be or if you don't know enough about them, just don't affiliate with either of them. The other person kept on saying "Go Republican!"

Lets just say that my persuasion (one Democrat and the rest non-affiliated) was far better than hers (zero) :cwink:.

I think the more important question is...did you tap that? :cwink: :oldrazz:

hippie_hunter
01-01-2008, 11:41 PM
I think the more important question is...did you tap that? :cwink: :oldrazz:

No, I didn't really find her to be that tappable :o

Plus she wasn't my type. I would never have thought that a person's religous beliefs, political beliefs, and other personal beliefs would be a reason to not want to go out with. Until I met her.

I am NEVER going to go out with someone as far right winged, religously close minded, or racist as hell like her.

Kel
01-08-2008, 07:45 PM
The block of voters that has grown the most, and has brought in the young vote is the independent block.

The thing that will help Republicans in the near future is the North to South migration. The population growth will give Southern states, predominantly Republican states more seats in the national government, and later the electoral votes. Northern states losing numbers and Southern states gaining.

People can say, yeah but those are Democratic voters.....but in reality that won't matter because the % of conservatives will still out vote the new voters in the South.....

Independent voters are the key in future.......and as soon as we have our presidential candidates hammered down.....WATCH THEM MOVE TO THE CENTER......almost at a dead run.

Addendum
01-08-2008, 08:20 PM
Everybody wants to be able to vote for Ron Paul. Who wouldn't want to vote for a "politician" that both read and understood the Constitution?

So rare.

I like Ron Paul's view on the Iraq war, but I'm not in favor of him doing away with the hard fought and earned civil rights from the 60s.

bell110
01-09-2008, 10:16 AM
Everybody wants to be able to vote for Ron Paul. Who wouldn't want to vote for a "politician" that both read and understood the Constitution?

So rare.

What do you mean "wants to be able to"?

I like Ron Paul's view on the Iraq war, but I'm not in favor of him doing away with the hard fought and earned civil rights from the 60s.

Where is your source that says he wants to get rid of civil rights?

Mr Sparkle
01-09-2008, 10:46 AM
I find it weird that you have to affiliate to a party at all.

Kel
01-09-2008, 10:49 AM
I don't....affiliate with a particular party....

I vote for people, not parties....

Anguissette1979
01-09-2008, 11:11 AM
I don't....affiliate with a particular party....

I vote for people, not parties....

Kel - aren't you supposed to be, um... in class teaching or something? :p

How has everything gone over with your students so far?

Matt
01-09-2008, 11:39 AM
Kel - aren't you supposed to be, um... in class teaching or something? :p

How has everything gone over with your students so far?

Kel doesn't teach. She just writes the material for each day on the board and the students know better than not to learn it :cwink:

Addendum
01-09-2008, 07:37 PM
Where is your source that says he wants to get rid of civil rights?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul188.html

Since he views it as unconstitutional, as he also views Roe v. Wade as unconstitutional and wants to overturn that, I made the inference that he wants to overturn anything he views as "unconstitutional", including the Civil Rights Act

Kel
01-09-2008, 07:41 PM
Kel - aren't you supposed to be, um... in class teaching or something? :p

How has everything gone over with your students so far?


LOL, oh crap you caught me......

Actually I have 2 conference periods........I was on one at that time.:cwink:

They are really enjoying this.....they love the slam tactics of the candidates...:wow:

Anguissette1979
01-09-2008, 08:00 PM
LOL, oh crap you caught me......

Actually I have 2 conference periods........I was on one at that time.:cwink:

They are really enjoying this.....they love the slam tactics of the candidates...:wow:

I remember sneaking on the Hype during my prep periods when I was an intern :p

I'm glad they're really getting into it (but not at all surprised that they enjoy the mudslinging ;))

Kel
01-09-2008, 08:04 PM
I remember sneaking on the Hype during my prep periods when I was an intern :p

I'm glad they're really getting into it (but not at all surprised that they enjoy the mudslinging ;))


Considering the places that a few teachers here have been caught on......the hype is extremely light.....lmao.

MetalloX
01-10-2008, 01:47 PM
Discusting.

Kel
01-10-2008, 06:04 PM
Disgusting.


Fixed....:cwink: