Do You Think MOS Will Happen?

[\S/JcDc\S/]

--Steve Younis of the popular Supermanhomepage.com site debunks variety. Yep VARIETY :eek:

http://www.supermanhomepage.com/news.php

Variety (http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117961116.html?categoryid=13&cs=1) reports that United Artists has green-lit Bryan Singer's next movie, in which he will team up once again with "The Usual Suspects" screenwriter Chris McQuarrie.

The report also claims that the World War II film will "delay Warner Bros.' hope of mounting a sequel to Superman Returns in the near future." The Superman Homepage has found out that this claim is false, with Warner Bros. and Bryan Singer reportedly on track to start filming the sequel to "Superman Returns" around March of 2008 as previously planned.


Further he adds in comment section

" I wouldn't post a rebuke to such a well respected media outlet as Variety if I didn't have it on good authority from a well placed source."

---

Steve has no reason to lie, I've never seen him post news without verifying it from a source :o

[Mr. Socko]

So Singer isn't making any of those movies Variety said...........

[fabman]

Eaarhmm, I think Singer will do this movie before Superman but I hope the Supes sequel won't be delayed because of it... we'll see...

[Showtime]

Steve has a very good track record but so does Variety, it's a tough call. I don't see why Steve would lie though, Variety could have gotten misinformation. Not sure here.

It's a question of who the source is or what not. I've emailed Steve a couple times in the past based on rumors I have heard, and he has debunked them and been correct.

The plot thickens.

[Retroman]

I believe Younis.....

[Showtime]

So Singer isn't making any of those movies Variety said...........

I think he is making the movie, but still doing "Returns, Returns" if that is plausible.

[Showtime]

I believe Younis.....

That is where I find myself leaning. Steve seems like a stand up guy, and he is throwing his good name out there. Makes sense to me.

[Matt]

Steve has a very good track record but so does Variety, it's a tough call. I don't see why Steve would lie though, Variety could have gotten misinformation. Not sure here.

It's a question of who the source is or what not. I've emailed Steve a couple times in the past based on rumors I have heard, and he has debunked them and been correct.

The plot thickens.

It is possible Younis has misinformation as well.

At anyrate JC, was this thread really necessary? The Younis information was being discussed in the other thread.

[Retroman]

That is where I find myself leaning. Steve seems like a stand up guy, and he is throwing his good name out there. Makes sense to me.

Exactly.

[Matt]

In all fairness, Variety probably checks their sources a bit more carefully. I am not saying that they are never wrong, but as the number one publication in the industry, they have a lot more to lose by being wrong than Steve Younis who pretty much runs a glorified fan site (Not a shot at him, but thats what SMHP is). So is it really fair to give him credit for throwing his good name out there, when Variety did the same?

[Showtime]

It is possible Younis has misinformation as well.

At anyrate JC, was this thread really necessary? The Younis information was being discussed in the other thread.

Touche! You are quite right. Thanks for pointing out my inconsistencies. I really appreciate it. :cwink:

Thread wasn't really necessary, I am sure one of the MODS will merge all of this, it's only going to get worse.

[Showtime]

In all fairness, Variety probably checks their sources a bit more carefully. I am not saying that they are never wrong, but as the number one publication in the industry, they have a lot more to lose by being wrong than Steve Younis who pretty much runs a glorified fan site (Not a shot at him, but thats what SMHP is). So is it really fair to give him credit for throwing his good name out there, when Variety did the same?

Point well taken, the difference to me is that Variety can rebound very quickly from something like that, almost instantly, while Steve may not. More risk from Steve's side in my opinion.

[Matt]

Touche! You are quite right. Thanks for pointing out my inconsistencies. I really appreciate it. :cwink:

Thread wasn't really necessary, I am sure one of the MODS will merge all of this, it's only going to get worse.

I got admit I am a bit perplexed to see JCDC of all people start this thread. It will undoubtedly get worse, but to simply start a thread of this nature for no reason other than to emphasize a point that has alread been emphasized so many times in the other thread is reckless and to be quite honest I expected more of a poster who has been here so long andw as fellow Law supporter. :cwink:

[Matt]

Point well taken, the difference to me is that Variety can rebound very quickly from something like that, almost instantly, while Steve may not. More risk from Steve's side in my opinion.

I disagree there. There are countless trade publications waiting for a chance to take Variety down a notch (it is like the lead horse in the Kentucky Derby breaking a leg on the final stretch). Younis on a website won't lose much for being wrong. Internet traffic is easy to recover...sales aren't.

[Showtime]

They are watching from above, they will swoop down and condense or close.

[Showtime]

I disagree there. There are countless trade publications waiting for a chance to take Variety down a notch (it is like the lead horse in the Kentucky Derby breaking a leg on the final stretch). Younis on a website won't lose much for being wrong. Internet traffic is easy to recover...sales aren't.

Can't you back to "community" and stop making me look bad on my side of the tracks? :cwink:

Well as I said in another thread, other big websites are re-publicizing Variety's reports. Sci-Fi Wire, IGN, Latino Review to name a few. I am sure it is popping up all over the net. So maybe Variety does have more to lose in that respect.

[Matt]

Can't you back to "community" and stop making me look bad on my side of the tracks? :cwink:

Haha, I'm sorry Showtime. Would it help if I started a "BRYAN SINGER IS TEH SUX!!LOL PWNED!!" thread and you can reprimand me? :cwink:


Well as I said in another thread, other big websites are re-publicizing Variety's reports. Sci-Fi Wire, IGN, Latino Review to name a few. I am sure it is popping up all over the net. So maybe Variety does have more to lose in that respect.

The fact that other sources are running with this makes me think it is all the more legit. As I stated in the other thread, IGN, Latino Review, Sci-Fi Wire...they all have their sources as well. Steve Younis isn't the only one who is going to check up on the Variety report before commenting on it. You can bet that the above mentioned have checked their sources and it seems like all signs may be pointing to legit.

[Retroman]

Does anyone know if Dan Harris is still directing I, Lucifer?

[Showtime]

Does anyone know if Dan Harris is still directing I, Lucifer?

I believe so.

[Showtime]

Haha, I'm sorry Showtime. Would it help if I started a "BRYAN SINGER IS TEH SUX!!LOL PWNED!!" thread and you can reprimand me? :cwink:

That would make it easier on me yes. I will take it like a man though. You're like that friend that keeps you in check, you want to say something snappy back, but in the back of your mind you know he is probably right. :cwink:


The fact that other sources are running with this makes me think it is all the more legit. As I stated in the other thread, IGN, Latino Review, Sci-Fi Wire...they all have their sources as well. Steve Younis isn't the only one who is going to check up on the Variety report before commenting on it. You can bet that the above mentioned have checked their sources and it seems like all signs may be pointing to legit.

I know. I was agreeing with you, actually arguing against my own argument I guess.

[Retroman]

I believe so.

Hmm..hopefully he starts that movie sooner rather later.

[Showtime]

I am pretty sure Dan had already proceeded to outline the Returns sequel months and months ago. I also thought that Singer was going to Hawaii again for some reason, and the sequel would be discussed there. On another note I believe that Mike, Dan, and Singer were all on set of Trick R Treat at one point. Who knows.

[Mr. Socko]

Which of them is directing Trick or Treat? It seems pretty cool

[echostation]

well all of this recent bit size news is actually good cuz for a good while this place was just dead stagnant water... at least now someone has pissed into it... infusing it with life with all the goodness of ammonia, urea and bacteria...

[Sun_Down]

I really don't know what to think about all this. It seems like Variety may have just inferred that the Superman flick would be delayed. But at the same time, I'm hesitant to believe a fansite which may be motivated by wishful thinking. Remember the X3 running time debacle? Some schmuck came along telling everyone what they wanted to hear (that the movie was something like 140 minutes) and everyone wanted to believe him and did. Then they all ended up being sorely disappointed when the truth came out.

[Showtime]

Which of them is directing Trick or Treat? It seems pretty cool

Mike D. Have you seen any pictures of it? It's really cool looking, like 70's style horror.

[Mr. Socko]

OUUUHHH! I've only heard about it and it sounded nice. Where can I see pics!

[\S/JcDc\S/]

I didn't see a topic for it and had just been sent an email about the supermanhomepage news bit from Steve. Didn't know when it was posted. Assumed it would have been put u. Sorry.

[Kid_Kaos]

If the WB guys want to keep any further info about Singer's sequel, they won't tell Younis or anyone else of the media anything else but "The movie will happen!". Otherwise they would've come forward by now instead of giving such important information to a fansite. And it's also what they stated since last fall.

But it's interesting that the rumors about Singer's leaving now even appear on more reliable sources than just some fanboards.

To me the situation looks like the same with WW now. WB blatantly lied to the media and fans about Whedon - though anyone with an ounce of intelligence knew it - and just a few days later he was gone.

And from another point of view: This is not Spider-Man or Batman were talking about, it's Superman, who happened to have a medicore movie the public has already forgotten about. There's absolutely no need to hold back any information about the sequel. If anything, they MUST give out some more detailed info to already build up hype. Otherwise they get the same result like SR, or even worse, if the movie sucks again.

[Gonking]

Honestly, I trust more in variety than in a Superman fan site

[Showtime]

OUUUHHH! I've only heard about it and it sounded nice. Where can I see pics!


http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i267/IronGiant29/l_469deabe453770b8f8de7a05a67b9294.jpg

[jrd550]

good points... merge the thread

[Showtime]

good points... merge the thread

Yes Master, I am sure the MODS will get right on it.

[Superman4ever]

I believe Younis.....

Me too! Actually for me it's a no-brainer.

[Mr. Socko]

Damn, that picture has a disturbing but likable quality to it.

Thanks Show

[Showtime]

Damn, that picture has a disturbing but likable quality to it.

Thanks Show

No problem man. My pleasure.

I think Mike D. is in tune with the classic horror of the mid to late 70's. Very excited about Trick R Treat.

[dude love]

Maybe, Younis and Variety are wrong. Who's to say Singer wont do the film after he's completed SR2? The best thing to do is wait for more news before jumping to conclusions. I'm sure more will come really soon.

[Binker]

Somethign is counter the other topic.

Robert Meyer Burnett, who produced and directed behind-the-scenes material for Superman Returns, says that March, 2008 is the planned start of principal photography (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5358#) for the sequel. A Q&A on BlueTights.net (http://www.bluetights.net/theplanet/showpost.php?p=1232219&postcount=329) reads:

Angeloz asks if I'm coming back to work on the sequel. The answer is...I'm ALREADY working on the sequel. Bryan, Brandon and the whole merry bunch will be coming back...and filming will probably begin March, 2008, as was always planned from the beginning. The WWII film Bryan plans to shoot over the summer will have NO EFFECT whatsoever on the Superman sequel schedule.

Doesn't sound like there will be any kind of delay, as was suggested by Variety.

[dark_sentinel]

yeah i just read that too

[GreenKToo]

plus this.
http://www.bluetights.net/theplanet/showthread.php?t=22887&page=19


"Alex DeLarge
Folks,

The source of all this consternation, the Michael Fleming VARIETY article about Bryan's WWII movie, stated the Superman Returns sequel would have to be pushed back.

This was speculation on Mr. Fleming's part. Bryan's WWII feature will begin filming on or around July 15th so as to accomodate the Superman sequel. The WWII film is designed to be shot quick and bring Bryan back to his USUAL SUSPECTS roots, including reteaming with Academy Award-winning writer Chris McQuarrie.

Bryan has ALREADY signed his deal to direct the Sequel. I know this because I videotaped him doing so. The Wachowski brothers are currently making SPEED RACER and have no involvement with the film.

I can't believe someone with a James T. Kirk avatar (can you tell me what season that photo is from...because I can...) would have the audicity to question ME!!! I mean, seriously, haven't you seen FREE ENTERPRISE, the feature I wrote and directed? Get the 2 disc Anchor Bay DVD or watch it on Showtime (It was airing this morning... so it'll probably be on later today sometime).

I've posted on BlueTights because this is the unofficial official site for all things Singer Superman related. Has been for YEARS now. I never post anywhere else (aside from own own website www.ludovicotechnique.com or my MySpace page). Justin does a terrific job here and for the most part, the posters are great (but where is LEXLIVES?). I'm certainly not paid to be here.

Now... keep those questions coming!!

[superbaby]

Old　ＮＥＷＳ！！！

[GreenKToo]

really?? well its new to me.

[jj9126]

BREAKING: I just talked to someone who worked on the craft services team who assured me that SR is returning to town next May.

Kevin Spacey went on record as saying this source makes "the best vegan tacos in Australia" so he is beyond trustworthy.

[Showtime]

Isn't Rob and the Alex DeLarge the same person?

[GreenKToo]

yes.Isn't Rob and the Alex DeLarge the same person?

[Showtime]

yes.

So this is old news right, from a couple days ago?

[Super Kal]

I'm gonna wait until there is OFFICIAL word from the WB.

[GreenKToo]

Yes 3-17, but it was new to me, and to some others as well, but since it is two days old, maybe its not as big of a deal as I first thought.So this is old news right, from a couple days ago?

[Showtime]

Possibly end of the week...

[Matt]

This thread is ridiculously unnecessary.

[GreenKToo]

well, I still think there's something to the rumors. smoke, fire, all that stuff. I dont care who directs myself, be it singer, or someone else, just as long as we get more action, a supervillain, etc etc i'll be happy.

[Showtime]

This thread is ridiculously unnecessary.

I'm sure somebody such as C. Lee will swoop in and close it.

[Showtime]

Yes 3-17, but it was new to me, and to some others as well, but since it is two days old, maybe its not as big of a deal as I first thought.

I thought it might be newer...

[\S/JcDc\S/]

http://www.comics2film.com/FanFrame.php?f_id=25704

First off thanks for the 681 emails in regards to this article. 679 of them are pro Superman Returns and 2 of them are ones that are less favorable. Amongst these e-mails we did receive a couple from our pals from Warner Bros. As we said in our original post, WB denies that this letter was ever sent by Dan Lin. I personally think that he is too busy polishing his Oscar that he won for The Departed.
Second, we just spoke with Bryan Singer and Gil Adler this past week on the set of Dave Parker’s Hills Run Red that our bud Robert Meyer Burnett is producing (yes the same guy who brought you the Superman Returns, X-Men 1.5, X-2 DVDs), guess what? Superman 2 is still planned to start production March of 2008 as it always was.
So for those of you who are fans of Singer rejoice! For those of you who are not…too bad. The studio is 100% behind Superman 2 and did I mention that Bryan’s deal is already done? Yes I did.
A couple of you who wrote in questioning our professionalism (literally two of you wrote in), you are right, we are not Variety or Hollywood Reporter, we have never claimed to be, we actually like movies and have never been anything but honest to our readers and viewers.
In regards to being “professional,” for god sakes have you not seen all the April Fools jokes that our entire community have posted this morning? Superherohype, DarkHorizons, LatinoReview, AICN, Joblo and others have run faux stories for April Fools and yet you try to compare us to Variety?
We are not a corporate site so we can say bull****, ****, **** and call a spade , well , a spade.

[Showtime]

This is actually a report straight from IESB.

I hope this is true and Singer is coming back, but why must he remind everybody that Singer has a deal? Singer has had a deal since October right? What does that mean. So did Burton? The site is obviously pro-Singer which is fine, hence the reminder that he received a large number of emails praising Returns.

We all know this will not quiet the rumors or speculation, it won't end until the movie releases unfortunately.

[\S/JcDc\S/]

I don't get it though. Comics2film I thought was a totally different site??? Why would it redirect that way... HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM???

[I_Hate_U_All]

Fans of singer rejoice. Fans of superman rub their chins in skepticism.

[\S/JcDc\S/]

I'm a fan of Singer as well. Just saying that's odd.

[I_Hate_U_All]

This is actually a report straight from IESB.

I hope this is true and Singer is coming back, but why must he remind everybody that Singer has a deal? Singer has had a deal since October right? What does that mean. So did Burton? The site is obviously pro-Singer which is fine, hence the reminder that he received a large number of emails praising Returns.

We all know this will not quiet the rumors or speculation, it won't end until the movie releases unfortunately.

Nope. Too true. This'll go on and on until WB itself releases official word. Interesting that the article tries to play up its credibility in the first part then in the last part backs down and tries to defend its belligerance by saying it's not supposed to be credible... makes me wonder.

[matthooper]

I doubt anyone really thought a reboot was going to happen. I assume most people were just trying to rile up the fans of SR who seem to take a personal interest in SR and it's direction. Something I'll never understand.

The problem with Superman Returns and it's direction is not all on Bryan Singer. He's a competent director who seems to generally respect the character and legacy of Superman. He made a good looking film, that for the most part made Superman look good on film. The major problem was with terrible story. To me, nothing about the story was original, inspiring, or imaginative. I'd love to hear one defender tell me what was imaginative or original about the film. But that's neither here nor there.

It's a fact that SR underperformed, it's a fact that the general public is not clammering for a sequel. That's not to say they don't want one either. WB will make sure that Singer gets what they want and what they think the public wants. That's is a superhero movie rather than a soap opera. For better or worse WB will have a heavy hand in the sequel with Singer. If a good script is writtten, Singer can make a good film...I think.

[Ita-KalEl]

I doubt anyone really thought a reboot was going to happen. I assume most people were just trying to rile up the fans of SR who seem to take a personal interest in SR and it's direction. Something I'll never understand.

The problem with Superman Returns and it's direction is not all on Bryan Singer. He's a competent director who seems to generally respect the character and legacy of Superman. He made a good looking film, that for the most part made Superman look good on film. The major problem was with terrible story. To me, nothing about the story was original, inspiring, or imaginative. I'd love to hear one defender tell me what was imaginative or original about the film. But that's neither here nor there.

It's a fact that SR underperformed, it's a fact that the general public is not clammering for a sequel. That's not to say they don't want one either. WB will make sure that Singer gets what they want and what they think the public wants. That's is a superhero movie rather than a soap opera. For better or worse WB will have a heavy hand in the sequel with Singer. If a good script is writtten, Singer can make a good film...I think.

I totally agree.

[Super Kal]

eh, not surprised...

[AgentPat]

It amazes me how deep IESB is willing to dig their own holes. :ninja:

[BareKnucklez]

boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo FIRE SINGER ALREADY HE STINKS!

[patrickbateman]

yeah well i'm not even going to watch that on the big screen when its out in 2009. i learned a lesson from batman and robin, not to give attention whores like joel a second chance.

"i want put some light on batman"

it ****ing batman the dark knight what part of that he doesnt get? saME with the last son of kyrpton hello LAST SON.. no hybirds.. no clones.. no offspring let alone grandson's of that planet

[Qwerty©]

Fans of singer rejoice. Fans of superman rub their chins in skepticism.I like how i'm not a fan just because I enjoyed Superman Returns.

By the way, a 'TRUE' Superman fan would respect ALL incarnations of the character.

[Super Kal]

they may respect it, but they don't have to like it.

[Maze]

Totally Kak :yay: :cwink:

[superbaby]

It amazes me how deep IESB is willing to dig their own holes. :ninja:
is IESB belonged to Singer or what? why they were so pissed off???

[Showtime]

There is no such thing as a "True Superman Fan". To announce that makes no sense.

[GreenKToo]

Now all we have to do is wait on the next rumor that states singer is out again. you just know its gonna happen.:D

[Super Kal]

There is no such thing as a "True Superman Fan". To announce that makes no sense.
:up::up:

[Lightning54SC]

Now all we have to do is wait on the next rumor that states singer is out again. you just know its gonna happen.:D

one can only pray....

ill say this who ever sold there soul for SR seriously got the short end of the deal, i think Home Alone made more money the Superman

[GreenKToo]

I liked S.R. o.k., but I would be lying if I said it was what I had been waiting 20 yrs for. If singer can up the action, give us a worthy supervillain, and make it have a lighter feel, then i'm willing to give him another chance.one can only pray....

ill say this who ever sold there soul for SR seriously got the short end of the deal, i think Home Alone made more money the Superman

[Qwerty©]

they may respect it, but they don't have to like it.
Never said they had to.

But it's funny how you are quick to defend him when you assume I said the same thing he did.

[patrickbateman]

I like how i'm not a fan just because I enjoyed Superman Returns.

By the way, a 'TRUE' Superman fan would respect ALL incarnations of the character.

so you love joel's incarnation of batman and robin:woot:

[dude love]

There is no such thing as a "True Superman Fan". To announce that makes no sense.

I'd say anybody who likes the character is a true fan. Love or hate any one of: Returns, the Reeve films, L&C, Smallville, the comics, if you genuinely like Superman, then you're a true fan.

[Nokio]

Well i can't say i'm plased with the news. even though i already knew he had resigned. Whatever. i expect more of the same. Yeah Supes may get someone to fight, but I don't expect it much to it. Probably end up being some female villian that singer has supes fight, and the rest of the film with him lifting stuff.

[Qwerty©]

so you love joel's incarnation of batman and robin:woot:
To respect every incarnation is not the same as loving every incarnation. Batman & Robin is a good representation of the 50's/60's era Batman. Not my favorite version of Batman, but it is not my, or anyones place, to say it is wrong.

[matthooper]

one can only pray....

ill say this who ever sold there soul for SR seriously got the short end of the deal, i think Home Alone made more money the Superman

Home Alone made a lot more than Superman Returns. Around $90 million more. If you adjust for inflation it made about $240 million more. Remember, ticket prices were much cheaper in 1990.

Making more money than Superman Returns isn't saying much. Rush Hour 2, Meet the Fockers, Mrs. Doubtfire, Signs and My Big Fat Greek Wedding all made more.

[Super Kal]

those were all better movies too though... and were specifically made for the kids in mind.

SR wasn't.

[Qwerty©]

those were all better movies too though... and were specifically made for the kids in mind.

SR wasn't.I don't know whether they were better movies or not, that's all opinion, but it is true that when a movie is kid friendly, You will always have success. SR made the mistake of not catering to the kids at all, and so lost them to POTC2.

[matthooper]

those were all better movies too though... and were specifically made for the kids in mind.

SR wasn't.

Rush Hour 2, Meet The Fockers, and My Big Fat Greek Wedding were not really made for kids. They did better because people liked them more.

The difference is no one cared about Superman Returns before it opened and no one cared after it opened. There was very little hype in the general film going public and word of mouth was poor for Superman Returns. Those other films had better marketing and better word of mouth.

I didn't like Superman Returns but I don't think Rush Hour 2 is better. That goes to show just how dissapointing Superman Returns was when My Big Fat Greek wedding made over $40 million more domestically.

[Spiderine]

I don't remember seeing a lot of publicity before the movie came out.

[superbaby]

The difference is no one cared about Superman Returns before it opened and no one cared after it opened. There was very little hype in the general film going public and word of mouth was poor for Superman Returns. Those other films had better marketing and better word of mouth.

I didn't like Superman Returns but I don't think Rush Hour 2 is better. That goes to show just how dissapointing Superman Returns was when My Big Fat Greek wedding made over $40 million more domestically.
why nobody cared before and after? wasn't superman the most iconic symbol for the american?
what had gone wrong?

[Qwerty©]

why nobody cared before and after? wasn't superman the most iconic symbol for the american?
what had gone wrong?
POTC2 was better in the eyes of the public. Simple as.

When you make a Superman movie that isn't very appealing to children, the BO is going to suffer. The fact it made over 200 million domestically anyway proves that Superman is still loved by many.

[El Payaso]

POTC2 was better in the eyes of the public. Simple as.

When you make a Superman movie that isn't very appealing to children, the BO is going to suffer. The fact it made over 200 million domestically anyway proves that Superman is still loved by many.

As much as people liked Batman begins.

But if that's the price to pay for a Superman movie that'¡s not childish then I'm quite happy with it.

[Showtime]

http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773

Teen Titans to the Big Screen

Source: The Hollywood Reporter (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3ibdf0b7dd533b3de61add7273f8d79b81)
May 31, 2007



DC Comics' superteam Teen Titans (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) is getting the big-screen treatment courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures, says The Hollywood Reporter. The live-action adaptation is being produced by Akiva Goldsman and Kerry Foster through their Weed Road production company, while Mark Verheiden has been brought on board to write the script. The Teen Titans, which first appeared in 1964, are comprised of Robin, Kid Flash, Aqualad, Wonder Girl and Speedy, the respective sidekicks of A-list heroes Batman, Flash, Aquaman, Wonder Woman (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) and Green Arrow.

The comic series reached X-Men-style success in the 1980s, when the team was relaunched in a new comic with the characters no longer kids but college-age adults and the stories explored more mature themes. The series also saw the addition of Cyborg, Starfire and Raven, original characters who weren't sidekicks, while the character of Robin matured into one called Nightwing.Most recently, the comic was adapted to the television screen with a Cartoon Network (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) series that ran from 2003-06 that used many of the '80s comics' heroes and story lines.

It is not known which heroes will be used, but Nightwing is said to be in the mix. Goldsman said the tone will be consistent with such recent Warners' comic book (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) fare as Batman Begins, Superman Returns and the upcoming Watchmen.Verheiden was a writer-producer on "Smallville" and is a writer-producer on "Battlestar Galactica (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#)."

(http://www.superherohype.com/forums/)

[FlawlessVictory]

Interesting. I hope WB doesn't force Nolan to put in Robin in the next Batman movie now. Also, I hope Akiva doesn't plan on doing any rewrites on the script. I'm guessing WB will test the waters, as far as superhero teamups are concerned, with this film and if all goes well and smooth then set their sights on making that JLA movie. I don't even know what to think of as far as the status of the Superman franchise is concerned. I guess we should hear something during ComicCon.

[Showtime]

I was told previously there would be an announcement at Comic-Con in regards to the sequel. This announcement would involve an update with Singer and his crew and the Man of Steel.

However, I was also told WB was hot on the Whakowski's, so who knows if the info is the real deal.

[FlawlessVictory]

I wouldn't be opposed to a Wachowski reboot but that means in all likelihood we would lose Brandon who I really liked. But still, I would sacrifice Brandon to get a potentially epic Superman movie with the likes of Brainiac or Darkseid or Metallo etc.. Basically, someone not involved in some goofy real estate scheme.

Or, knowing Singer we would get Zod as the villain and basically a rehash of Superman 2. I'm kidding, mostly. :csad:

[spider-neil]

imho there is no way WB are going to continue with singer, that simply doesn't make financial sense.
WB's bet bet is to make a hulk reboot and sweep everything concerning SR under the carpet.

to be honest they only thing I'll miss is routh I thought he did a decent job with a terrible script, everything else however I will be glad to see the back of.

[Showtime]

I wouldn't be opposed to a Wachowski reboot but that means in all likelihood we would lose Brandon who I really liked. But still, I would sacrifice Brandon to get a potentially epic Superman movie with the likes of Brainiac or Darkseid or Metallo etc.. Basically, someone not involved in some goofy real estate scheme.

Or, knowing Singer we would get Zod as the villain and basically a rehash of Superman 2. I'm kidding, mostly. :csad:

From what I was told, the biggest problem WB had with doing a reboot would be letting go of Brandon. They were really happy with him.

I would strongly suggest looking towards Comic Con for the answer...:cwink:

[FlawlessVictory]

From what I was told, the biggest problem WB had with doing a reboot would be letting go of Brandon. They were really happy with him.

I would strongly suggest looking towards Comic Con for the answer...:cwink:

Excellent. Looking forward to it. :up:

[Ita-KalEl]

LOL, again with these BS?
I have not any problem to be exited for a new Superman movie directed by different directors for a 2009-2010 release date. But I'm really sick of all the false specultations than come from so called insiders.
For me this press release means only that the WB want a lighter movie with super-teen-agers to replicate the success of the Smallville young JLA episode. Simple and clear.

Recently we e have read a ton of official statements from Peters, Routh, Singer and the writers about the sequel, and they said that the sequel is on track but the script will be ready only after the summer. So, if we use the logic, the WB can officially announce the movie only after the Summer.

[TheComicbookKid]

If we don't have anything new by year's end, the Singer Superman is probably done, unfortunately.

But I don't believe the Titan's announcement meaning anything. Besides, Superman 2(?), I can't think of a superhero film anywhere near set for the summer of 2009.

Wait, probably Wolvie, but that's a low budget film.

[dark_b]

singer is working on the sequel. and brandon is superman.
fact.

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

Not really a fan of this series anyway..

Superman :The man of steel , is all i care about hearing at this time.

[Matt]

singer is working on the sequel. and brandon is superman.
fact.

No, those aren't facts as WB has yet to confirm it. Not Peters, not Routh, not Singer decide when or if the sequel happens. WB does.

[The Kid]

Meh, we'll see. This could mean superman's been dumped... It's a good cartoon, Robo. I don't know about the comic book version.

[dark_b]

No, those aren't facts as WB has yet to confirm it. Not Peters, not Routh, not Singer decide when or if the sequel happens. WB does.
what about the video where singer and the writters and the PRODUCER are talking about the sequel?

fact is that at this time they are working on the sequel. it is not fact if they will make the movie in one year. but nwo they are working.

[spider-neil]

singer is working on the sequel. and brandon is superman.
fact.


until WB confirm it it isn't fact. WB aren't shy of canning projects (WW/flash).

[TheComicbookKid]

Do we need another thread to discuss this? We've argued about this across many threads. Hell, we still have a fire or keep Singer thread!

[Showtime]

LOL, again with these BS?
I have not any problem to be exited for a new Superman movie directed by different directors for a 2009-2010 release date. But I'm really sick of all the false specultations than come from so called insiders.
For me this press release means only that the WB want a lighter movie with super-teen-agers to replicate the success of the Smallville young JLA episode. Simple and clear.

Recently we e have read a ton of official statements from Peters, Routh, Singer and the writers about the sequel, and they said that the sequel is on track but the script will be ready only after the summer. So, if we use the logic, the WB can officially announce the movie only after the Summer.

Where is there false speculation? There is an article about WB doing a Teen Titans movie, and I am suprised we are getting news on this minor league film but no news on a sequel yet. Where is this so called B.S.?

If you are refering to me when you say "so called insider" than address your comment to me, don't be "vague".

Also, as I said, look to Comic Con for an official announcement, which is what you will get. This connects with your quest for a sequel, so you should be happy instead of going off on a tangent.

[TheComicbookKid]

^ Bringing down the house, Showtime!

I wish I knew someone on the inside.

[Showtime]

Do we need another thread to discuss this? We've argued about this across many threads. Hell, we still have a fire or keep Singer thread!

I thought we did, but if a Mod things not they can close it, move it, or combine it. I thought it was warrented to point out we are getting some more news on another project, when we should be getting much more news on a sequel. Instead there are rumors about a Spiderman 4 already circulating.

[TheComicbookKid]

I understand. But I think the WB needs something else. I doubt Doom Patrol or the Metal Men is happening. They really want a X-Men style team movie not the JLA.

[Showtime]

Well original rumors were pointing to JLA, maybe they have decided that they are replacing this with Teen Titans, or maybe they will do both.

[Antonello Blueberry]

Where is there false speculation? There is an article about WB doing a Teen Titans movie, and I am suprised we are getting news on this minor league film but no news on a sequel yet. Where is this so called B.S.?

It's an article about WB starting development with a producer (Goldsman) on a comic-book related project.
That Singer and crew are developing the sequel it was reported in more than one article.

[Showtime]

It's an article about WB starting development with a producer (Goldsman) on a comic-book related project.
That Singer and crew are developing the sequel it was reported in more than one article.

I didn't say there wasn't articles pointing to the sequel...I am saying there is still no sequel news from WB officially. I wasn't trying to say Teen Titans is official and his happening, and Superman is not, I just want more news.

Not Brandon shouting "Look for Superman 2!"or Peters saying "Bryan is just like Barbara Streisand, and we hope to have a script done and production going! Yipee"

So far the list is long and prolific for those mentioning a sequel...

Ma Kent
Lex Luthor
Superman/Clark
Peters
Dougherty
Harris
Singer

I am just hoping for an official announcement which will be at Comic Con. I don't know why that is a big deal and rubs some people the wrong way.

[TheComicbookKid]

On the Newsarama boards, some people are complaining about Verheiden(sp) writing, and he's a comic writer. I remember people complaining about wanting comic writers involved now they don't. Comic fans are bipolar.:yay:

[Antonello Blueberry]

So far the list is long and prolific for those mentioning a sequel...

Ma Kent
Lex Luthor
Superman/Clark
Peters
Dougherty
Harris
Singer

Adler? Variety?

[Showtime]

I think comic writers coming on to a project can be both good and bad, personally I am sick of the "Dini for Superman" movement. I think the guy is an incredible talent for what he is, but I don't understand why he is the savior to some.

[Showtime]

Adler? Variety?

As I said the list is prolific, what is wrong with wanting an official announcement. I am not allowed to feel this way I guess?

[Ita-KalEl]

Where is there false speculation? There is an article about WB doing a Teen Titans movie, and I am suprised we are getting news on this minor league film but no news on a sequel yet. Where is this so called B.S.?

If you are refering to me when you say "so called insider" than address your comment to me, don't be "vague".

Also, as I said, look to Comic Con for an official announcement, which is what you will get. This connects with your quest for a sequel, so you should be happy instead of going off on a tangent.

Showtime if you want to say something interesting and NEW you are wellcome, but if you still believe in the fake whachosky story, please...
Since your rumor we have heard Peters, Routh, Singer and the writers confirming that they are working on the sequel....


For example with this thread and the phrase "WB was hot with the Wachowsky and there will be an annoucement at the comic con", do you want to tell us that your insider has told you that the Wachowsky bros will direct the new Superman movie and that it will be annouced in July?
Be clear, because so in July if you are right we will say that you are a myth and that we are only stupid fanboys, if you are wrong...that you are a not reliable.

The point is that IMO iesb, the producers, the actors, the writers and the director are more reliable than an "insider".
But I don't know your insider and his last rumors...so who knows?
If you have some new info, please tell us, because we are sick of the speculations based on nothing.

[Antonello Blueberry]

As I said the list is prolific, what is wrong with wanting an official announcement. I am not allowed to feel this way I guess?
At this point after it was reported by all parts that the sequel is in development, the only official announcement would be done when the sequel gets greenlit, sop after the script is completed and everyone agreed on pays and shares.

[Eros]

so another WB superhero movie that will never actually get made.

[Matt]

what about the video where singer and the writters and the PRODUCER are talking about the sequel?


Do you mean Jon Peters? He is a producer in name only, because it is cheaper for WB to give him a salary than fire him and have to pay a rather generous severence package. He no longer has any power in the studio. He had nothing to do with SR, he has nothing to do with whether or not it is greenlit.

[I SEE SPIDEY]

^ I don't understand why people just don't get that?

[Showtime]

Showtime if you want to say something interesting and NEW you are wellcome, but if you still believe in the fake whachosky story, please...
Since your rumor we have heard Peters, Routh, Singer and the writers confirming that they are working on the sequel....


For example with this thread and the phrase "WB was hot with the Wachowsky and there will be an annoucement at the comic con", do you want to tell us that your insider has told you that the Wachowsky bros will direct the new Superman movie and that it will be annouced in July?
Be clear, because so in July if you are right we will say that you are a myth and that we are only stupid fanboys, if you are wrong...that you are a not reliable.

The point is that IMO iesb, the producers, the actors, the writers and the director are more reliable than an "insider".
But I don't know your insider and his last rumors...so who knows?
If you have some new info, please tell us, because we are sick of the speculations based on nothing.


I have no idea what you are talking about, maybe I wrote it wrong previously or maybe you misintepreted what I said. I am saying there will be an announcement at Comic Con about the sequel. I am saying that it will involve Singer and his crew doing a sequel. To counter that, I am saying that it might not be valid, since I also heard the WB was hot on the Whakowski Bros and look how that turned out. If you look at my post which you are now responding to, I told you that "you should be happy instead of going off on a tangent".

So stop threatening me with the fact that I will turn into some "myth" if it turns out not to be true. You keep arguing with me, although I keep telling you that I want a sequel WITH SINGER, WITH MIKE, and WITH DAN. Save your self righteous I love Superman Returns retorts for somebody else because you are wasting it on me. I already like the freakin movie.

So again, if I wasn't clear in my post, I apologize. If you misread it, that was your bad. You need to relax though, this just shows that if somebody says something against SR you go into your diatribe about how un-reliable I am. I was one of the first to report many aspects of Superman Returns, such as the gunner on the roof scene & the Mustang scene. Please let's not go any further.

[Showtime]

At this point after it was reported by all parts that the sequel is in development, the only official announcement would be done when the sequel gets greenlit, sop after the script is completed and everyone agreed on pays and shares.

Well there should/would be an update at Comic Con.

[Paste Pot Pete]

I am just hoping for an official announcement which will be at Comic Con. I don't know why that is a big deal and rubs some people the wrong way.

Because it's just more negativity, albeit vaguely disguised negativity. 99% of the time when someone goes "Why haven't we heard any official news?" they really mean "It's looking like a sequel won't happen after all! Yay!"

[Showtime]

Because it's just more negativity, albeit vaguely disguised negativity. 99% of the time when someone goes "Why haven't we heard any official news?" they really mean "It's looking like a sequel won't happen after all! Yay!"

Well that isn't the case with me, ask around buddy. :cwink:

[TheComicbookKid]

Because it's just more negativity, albeit vaguely disguised negativity. 99% of the time when someone goes "Why haven't we heard any official news?" they really mean "It's looking like a sequel won't happen after all! Yay!"

Dude, Showtime is one of the defenders of the movie, although with a calmer head than some.

I do think it's ridiculous to still be fighting about plot points to SR on a Sequel board. Go to the SR board to talk about that movie. This is the place to talk positively or negatively about Singer's possible sequel.

When and if the sequel starts up, the people that bash Singerman will still come here despite their objects to Singer's direction. Believe That!

[Lighthouse]

I don't think there is anything on the SR sequel because there just isn't much to tell. They are all working on different projects. Once Valkyrie is done, there will probably be a lot more news, and I'm 90% sure Singer and co. are onboard for the sequel. I don't even like Superman Returns, but if I were a betting man, I'd bet on this.

[BatJeff7786]

No, those aren't facts as WB has yet to confirm it. Not Peters, not Routh, not Singer decide when or if the sequel happens. WB does.

Uh, doesn't this pretty much confirm it?

http://www.superherohype.com/news/supermannews.php?id=4852

That was from way back in October.

EDIT: True, it does say that it hasn't been Greenlit, but that doesn't mean it WON'T be made.

[Showtime]

That is definately not confirmation but it is an article pointing in a positive direction.

[Ita-KalEl]

Showtime I didn't want to attack you. Excuse me if I was too rude. :)
I will be more than happy if you have some news even if the sequel will be canceled for a reboot. I'm sick only of the speculations :)

I agree with Lighthouse, IMO by now there isn't nothing to say about Superman.
We'll know something at the ComicCon, or more probably, after the summer (october-december).

[GreenKToo]

I find it disturbing that W.B. would make a teen titans film before the Flash, G.L., or W.W.

[Showtime]

I find it equally disturbing, or even Aquaman.

[C. Lee]

I find it disturbing that W.B. would make a teen titans film before the Flash, G.L., or W.W.

But understandable.......movies in general are aimed at teenagers (comic book movies moreso).....there was the recent TT cartoon that did well.....so making a movie aimed at teens starring teens with super powers sounds like a win win situation.

[BareKnucklez]

singer is working on the sequel. and brandon is superman.
fact.


That's some old man's sick joke... Brandon is no Superman... He isn't even old looking enough for Superboy!

[BareKnucklez]

I have no idea what you are talking about, maybe I wrote it wrong previously or maybe you misintepreted what I said. I am saying there will be an announcement at Comic Con about the sequel. I am saying that it will involve Singer and his crew doing a sequel. To counter that, I am saying that it might not be valid, since I also heard the WB was hot on the Whakowski Bros and look how that turned out. If you look at my post which you are now responding to, I told you that "you should be happy instead of going off on a tangent".

So stop threatening me with the fact that I will turn into some "myth" if it turns out not to be true. You keep arguing with me, although I keep telling you that I want a sequel WITH SINGER, WITH MIKE, and WITH DAN. Save your self righteous I love Superman Returns retorts for somebody else because you are wasting it on me. I already like the freakin movie.

So again, if I wasn't clear in my post, I apologize. If you misread it, that was your bad. You need to relax though, this just shows that if somebody says something against SR you go into your diatribe about how un-reliable I am. I was one of the first to report many aspects of Superman Returns, such as the gunner on the roof scene & the Mustang scene. Please let's not go any further.

My insider told me that your info is as flawed as the movie itself... Guess this explains why you like such a bad movie. :oldrazz:

I don't know why anyone would want the Whakowski's with all the problems Larry...err sorry Laura Whakowski has had keeping his mind of his sexuality in past films.

Besides the Matrix was a rip off from a book, and the movie Dark City.
They did nothing special with the sequels showing that they were a one show pony, and to give them a movie like Superman would be as bad an idea as giving it to Bryan Singer... Oh wait. :wow:

[Showtime]

But understandable.......movies in general are aimed at teenagers (comic book movies moreso).....there was the recent TT cartoon that did well.....so making a movie aimed at teens starring teens with super powers sounds like a win win situation.

It only makes sense, I agree. However, some ideas using knowledge that seems to be win/win, can end up bombing. I think this movie however, will do well.

[Showtime]

My insider told me that your info is as flawed as the movie itself... Guess this explains why you like such a bad movie. :oldrazz:

I don't know why anyone would want the Whakowski's with all the problems Larry...err sorry Laura Whakowski has had keeping his mind of his sexuality in past films.

Besides the Matrix was a rip off from a book, and the movie Dark City.
They did nothing special with the sequels showing that they were a one show pony, and to give them a movie like Superman would be as bad an idea as giving it to Bryan Singer... Oh wait. :wow:

I certainly wouldn't endorse the Whakowski's, since I hated The Matrix and didn't even bother with the sequels. I think their involvment with Vendetta was well done though.

[FlawlessVictory]

That's some old man's sick joke... Brandon is no Superman... He isn't even old looking enough for Superboy!

I liked Brandon as Superman but hated that they made him a father in this film. He just looks way too young. He practically looks like Tristan's brother, especially at the most recent media events for the movie where Tristan has grown somewhat since filming.

[Showtime]

Brandon is now Superman to me, I think he was the best part of the movie.

I jsut read the article in your sig Flawless, now I know why I hated the movie so much, Raimi's original vision was bungled by corporate.

[Eros]

Brandon is now Superman to me, I think he was the best part of the movie.

I jsut read the article in your sig Flawless, now I know why I hated the movie so much, Raimi's original vision was bungled by corporate.

Tis the tale of many movies that could of been great.

[dark_b]

Do you mean Jon Peters? He is a producer in name only, because it is cheaper for WB to give him a salary than fire him and have to pay a rather generous severence package. He no longer has any power in the studio. He had nothing to do with SR, he has nothing to do with whether or not it is greenlit.no i am not talking about jon peters. its the other guy. there is a video where all of those guys are together and tehy are talking about the sequel.
i amsorry that you didnt see the video.
but they are talking about the sequel.
so until WB doesn fire singer and the writters they are doing the sequel.

[dark_b]

I certainly wouldn't endorse the Whakowski's, since I hated The Matrix and didn't even bother with the sequels. I think their involvment with Vendetta was well done though.showtime nooooooooooooooo.
not the matrix man.
i have lost you............................................... ......:wow:

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

Say what you like about the matrix sequels..but you didn't like No1? showtime, shame on you.. and how can people not love the fights in Reloaded. thats awesome.

[Showtime]

I can't say much about the sequels, I didn't see them. I can say alot of bad things about The Matrix though. Hey, if it makes you feel better, I liked Robocop.

[Showtime]

showtime nooooooooooooooo.
not the matrix man.
i have lost you............................................... ......:wow:

Nope, I am still here, but I still don't like The Matrix.

[FlawlessVictory]

Brandon is now Superman to me, I think he was the best part of the movie.

I jsut read the article in your sig Flawless, now I know why I hated the movie so much, Raimi's original vision was bungled by corporate.

Yup, it's a shame. Raimi had been doing just fine up to that point without anyone butting in. They should have just left the man alone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

[dark_b]

I can't say much about the sequels, I didn't see them. I can say alot of bad things about The Matrix though. Hey, if it makes you feel better, I liked Robocop.
ok showtime lets never mention the matrix movies again ?
we are good :woot:

[dark_b]

Yup, it's a shame. Raimi had been doing just fine up to that point without anyone butting in. They should have just left the man alone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
agree. but that doesnt change the fact that noone forced raimi to do anything. if he thought that he can not make a movie with arads ideas he should just go away.

[FlawlessVictory]

agree. but that doesnt change the fact that noone forced raimi to do anything. if he thought that he can not make a movie with arads ideas he should just go away.

True. He could have stood more firm on his ideas. He certainly had leverage, with the success both financially and critically of the first two films.

[Showtime]

Yup, it's a shame. Raimi had been doing just fine up to that point without anyone butting in. They should have just left the man alone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

I agree with you 100% there.

[Showtime]

True. He could have stood more firm on his ideas. He certainly had leverage, with the success both financially and critically of the first two films.

Raimi certainly could have incorporated Avrad's ideas in a better manner than he did. You could tell Venom was just a throw in.

[Showtime]

ok showtime lets never mention the matrix movies again ?
we are good :woot:

Trust me, I don't want to talk about them at all anyway.

[dark_b]

Trust me, I don't want to talk about them at all anyway.i dont know about what you are talking about.

pshhhhhhhhh :yay:

[Showtime]

i dont know about what you are talking about.

pshhhhhhhhh :yay:

If something is lower quality, I give it less discussion time than something of better quality. :cwink:

[dark_b]

If something is lower quality, I give it less discussion time than something of better quality. :cwink:grrrrrr

you are enyoing this right :woot:

[Showtime]

grrrrrr

you are enyoing this right :woot:

I am. :yay:

You see, when I am unhappy, I just apply what I want to see into my own scripts...

Pillow turns and comes face to face with an enraged Vanquish.

VANQUISH
Leave her alone.

PILLOW
You keep out of this.

Vanquishes EYES LIGHT UP an electric green illuminating the entire alley. His right hand shakes. His veins rise to the surface. The hair on his hand straightens and then...

AN EXPLOSION

of electricity SURGES from his hand and rushes past Pillow. The blast collides with Gorman’s chest catapulting him deep into the alley.

Pillow stares at Gorman’s shuddering body and then turns back to Vanquish.

Vanquish steps towards Pillow, Electricity swirls around his pupils and courses through his retina. Pillow rushes out of the alley leaving his injured friend behind.

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

I can't say much about the sequels, I didn't see them. I can say alot of bad things about The Matrix though. Hey, if it makes you feel better, I liked Robocop.

Oh dude..

its all better now.:woot:

[Sun_Down]

To address the thread topic : I don't think announcing a project that has a 1% chance of ever happening really means anything to the future of the Superman franchise.

[echostation]

I think there are better chances of a Justice League film happening rather than this

this seems like one of the most uninteresting films to make honestly... Why not just go full steam ahead on a Green Lantern film... that's a film that could make seriously lots of money if done right

[Justice Bringer]

This is a smart idea. Since we have Batman TDK already; if they greenlight Superman, The Flash, Shazam and Teen Titans I'll be happy.

That's a pretty heavy lineup of cool DC films; coupled with The Watchmen, The Spirit and Sandman.

They should hold off on the JLA film till Nolan completes his trilogy.

Its an awesome idea to use Nightwing for this. Smart move. They can set it in the 'not too distant' future a decade or so after Nolan's Batman; showing where Dick Grayson ended up.

[nintendo nerd]

I can't say much about the sequels, I didn't see them. I can say alot of bad things about The Matrix though. Hey, if it makes you feel better, I liked Robocop.

Robocop is a masterpiece IMO. The ending is just perfect

What's your name son?


Murphy

It gives me goosebumps all the time

[nintendo nerd]

To address the thread topic : I don't think announcing a project that has a 1% chance of ever happening really means anything to the future of the Superman franchise.

Bingo

[Iron Fist]

I'm interested in the Titans film. As for news of the Superman sequel, I'm worried as to when we'll hear news. I'm sure we'll have something in the months ahead.

[\S/JcDc\S/]

http://www.comic-con.org/

Hmm Comic-Con in San Diego or WonderCon in Sanfran?

The bad thing is even with a flat out confirmation we've seen projects fall apart so much over the years it may still be hard to believe :o

[Justice Bringer]

Gah whatever happened to that Doom Patrol movie they were doing? scrap pile?

[Showtime]

San Diego

[Showtime]

Gah whatever happened to that Doom Patrol movie they were doing? scrap pile?

The what patrol?

[\S/JcDc\S/]

San Diego

I hope so. One thing is for sure, I'm gonna be pissed if they refuse to answer direct questions. If I fly out to see Singer at any upcoming event, I kid you not even if i'm not allowed to ask a question I'm getting up and screaming "Bring back Lexcorp" :D :up:

[Iron Fist]

The what patrol?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doom_Patrol

[GreenKToo]

That would be the best news, along with who is going to be the villain.I hope so. One thing is for sure, I'm gonna be pissed if they refuse to answer direct questions. If I fly out to see Singer at any upcoming event, I kid you not even if i'm not allowed to ask a question I'm getting up and screaming "Bring back Lexcorp" :D :up:

[Showtime]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doom_Patrol

Thanks Iron.

Seems like a pretty cool premise, there seems to be some sort of X-Men influence there by looking at some of the illustrations and character write ups. Not sure who came first.

[Showtime]

That would be the best news, along with who is going to be the villain.

If Singer is present, it's a definate clue that something with a sequel is going to be discussed.

We know he won't be discussing Logan's Run.

[Iron Fist]

Thanks Iron.

Seems like a pretty cool premise, there seems to be some sort of X-Men influence there by looking at some of the illustrations and character write ups. Not sure who came first.

No problem man. And as for them sort of being like the X-men...When news about a movie based on the Doom Patrol surfaced, it was said that it would be like the X-men.

And as for who came first, it was the Doom Patrol. They made their first appearance in April 1963 and X-men was September 1963.

[\S/JcDc\S/]

It would be wise if they don't act secretive. Throw out a couple of key fanboy dreams like Brainiac/Metallo/Lexcorp

If those were listed you just watch the buzz for a new Superman movie realllllllly start catching fire.

[Eros]

It would be wise if they don't act secretive. Throw out a couple of key fanboy dreams like Brainiac/Metallo/Lexcorp

If those were listed you just watch the buzz for a new Superman movie realllllllly start catching fire.


I do hope Brainiac and Metallo are mentioend if they are in the sequel.

[Showtime]

No problem man. And as for them sort of being like the X-men...When news about a movie based on the Doom Patrol surfaced, it was said that it would be like the X-men.

And as for who came first, it was the Doom Patrol. They made their first appearance in April 1963 and X-men was September 1963.

Very cool. Thanks for the info. Never even heard of a possible movie, and it looks like Marvel liked the idea of the Doom Patrol.

[Iron Fist]

Very cool. Thanks for the info. Never even heard of a possible movie, and it looks like Marvel liked the idea of the Doom Patrol.

No problem. And yeah I think SHH reported that a movie would be made a few months back.

[The Incredible Hulk]

San Diego

doesnt look like they're even on the list at the moment...

http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5799

[Showtime]

Doesn't even look like whose on the list?

[The Incredible Hulk]

Singer or anyone involved with the "Superman franchise."

[Lighthouse]

Singer or anyone involved with the "Superman franchise."

Trick or Treat is gonna be featured there, so Dougherty is at least going to be there. Since Singer produced it, wouldn't be surprised if he was there as well.

[Antonello Blueberry]

Trick or Treat is gonna be featured there, so Dougherty is at least going to be there. Since Singer produced it, wouldn't be surprised if he was there as well.
I strongly doubt as he starts shooting Valkyrie a week earlier.

[Showtime]

Singer or anyone involved with the "Superman franchise."

Well as above, Dougherty is a lock to be there, and I heard Singer is going to be with him along with Harris.

[Iron Fist]

^ I hope so. :up:

[dude love]

I strongly doubt as he starts shooting Valkyrie a week earlier.

In Berlin, from what I hear. So that's abit of a freakin' trek.

And why does everyone have to post a thread about a DC movie in the Superman boards. "OMFG New Line is making a Shazam move! This means the superman sequel is DOOMED! lolz!!!!!!!11111shift+1"? Cripesonfriday, it's got nothing to do with Superman!

[The Kid]

I hope Jason's a teen titan

[Retroman]

lol
Trick or Treat is gonna be featured there, so Dougherty is at least going to be there. Since Singer produced it, wouldn't be surprised if he was there as well.

Yup and i'd expect that they (Harris and Dougherty) would have begun penning a draft of the script.

[Showtime]

I hope Jason's a teen titan

HA HA. That's awesome. :woot:

[Showtime]

lol


Yup and i'd expect that they (Harris and Dougherty) would have begun penning a draft of the script.

I am wondering what the status is...

[Showtime]

And why does everyone have to post a thread about a DC movie in the Superman boards. "OMFG New Line is making a Shazam move! This means the superman sequel is DOOMED! lolz!!!!!!!11111shift+1"? Cripesonfriday, it's got nothing to do with Superman!

It's not everyone, I posted this. If you are refering to me then respond to me. I was posting about the lack of news on the sequel, not that the sequel was doomed. Which means I want more news pointing towards a sequel, not that I think the sequel is doomed?

[dude love]

I hope Jason's a teen titan

I love you. :wow:

[dude love]

It's not everyone, I posted this. If you are refering to me then respond to me. I was posting about the lack of news on the sequel, not that the sequel was doomed. Which means I want more news pointing towards a sequel, not that I think the sequel is doomed?

You included, but then all these people start going on about how the Superman sequel is doomed, because the assistant caterer on SR got drunk and peed his pants or something equally asinine and vaguely related.

[Showtime]

Well I posted this thread, and I didn't say anything remotely close to that DL. I want a sequel, so you shouldn't group people together. It would be nice to get some more relevant news though. I understand everybody from Singer's camp has reported a sequel, but I mean some news on the actual movie, the direction it's going.

[Lighthouse]

I strongly doubt as he starts shooting Valkyrie a week earlier.

True, but he also left Austrailia in the middle of shooting SR to come to Comicon. Not saying he'll definately be there, but there is a possibility.

[Showtime]

http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/06/the-hedgehog-is-a-dingo/

Posted Jun 6th 2007 2:01PM by TMZ Staff
Filed under: Star Catcher

Ron Jeremy, 54-years-old and growing more portly each day, still manages to score with twenty-something chicks. For those unfamiliar, the term commonly associated with a male "cougar" is a "dingo."

TMZ spotted "The Hedgehog" last night at Les Deux, where the star of "Anal Princess Diaries 2" and "The Texas Dildo Masquerade" was flirting with a group of females -- with one lucky 26-year-old hanging on and giving the porn star a few pecks on the cheek.

"Superman Returns" star Brandon Routh was out with fiancee Courtney Ford at Il Sole, where he said another "Superman" flick is definitely happening. Also getting some Sole food; comedian George Carlin, who didn't want to be seen looking like "a bum."

[Steelsheen]

^^ reading all that in one go made me first think that Routh and wife-to-be are hanging around with porn starlets :eek: :O

[Showtime]

They are well adjusted.

[merced]

http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/06/the-hedgehog-is-a-dingo/

Posted Jun 6th 2007 2:01PM by TMZ Staff
Filed under: Star Catcher

Ron Jeremy, 54-years-old and growing more portly each day, still manages to score with twenty-something chicks. For those unfamiliar, the term commonly associated with a male "cougar" is a "dingo."

TMZ spotted "The Hedgehog" last night at Les Deux, where the star of "Anal Princess Diaries 2" and "The Texas Dildo Masquerade" was flirting with a group of females -- with one lucky 26-year-old hanging on and giving the porn star a few pecks on the cheek.

"Superman Returns" star Brandon Routh was out with fiancee Courtney Ford at Il Sole, where he said another "Superman" flick is definitely happening. Also getting some Sole food; comedian George Carlin, who didn't want to be seen looking like "a bum."

As definite as Routh is about this his repeated assurances that everything is a go seem a bit overdone. Getting a bit of a Ratner vibe. If it was definite the TMZ reporter wouldn't ask if there will be another in the first place.

[Showtime]

I don't really think one sentence is overdone, but whichever way it goes, I am sure we hear soon.

[merced]

I was told previously there would be an announcement at Comic-Con in regards to the sequel. This announcement would involve an update with Singer and his crew and the Man of Steel.

However, I was also told WB was hot on the Whakowski's, so who knows if the info is the real deal.

If WB were making an annoucement at comicon Singer would be there. It'd be set up by now I think since Singer's schedule is so tight. WW2 flick starts filming in Germany about a week before comicon. Singer is not listed as attending so I bet this rumor is as bogus as the Wachowski one turned out to be. Dougherty is the only one attending for Trick or Treat. For all we know he may not answer any Superman questions. If he does bet its only a rehash of what they said after the Saturn awards. I am not expecting any new news about the sequel out of comicon.

[Showtime]

Singer is supposed to be there with Dougherty, if he isn't, he isn't. It's scheduled to start filming, not written in stone, just like anything else.

Your posting style and know it all demeanor remind me of another charming poster.

[Iron Fist]

http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/06/the-hedgehog-is-a-dingo/

Posted Jun 6th 2007 2:01PM by TMZ Staff
Filed under: Star Catcher

Ron Jeremy, 54-years-old and growing more portly each day, still manages to score with twenty-something chicks. For those unfamiliar, the term commonly associated with a male "cougar" is a "dingo."

TMZ spotted "The Hedgehog" last night at Les Deux, where the star of "Anal Princess Diaries 2" and "The Texas Dildo Masquerade" was flirting with a group of females -- with one lucky 26-year-old hanging on and giving the porn star a few pecks on the cheek.

"Superman Returns" star Brandon Routh was out with fiancee Courtney Ford at Il Sole, where he said another "Superman" flick is definitely happening. Also getting some Sole food; comedian George Carlin, who didn't want to be seen looking like "a bum."

Awesome. :up:

[Pickle-El]

Singer is supposed to be there with Dougherty, if he isn't, he isn't. It's scheduled to start filming, not written in stone, just like anything else.

Your posting style and know it all demeanor remind me of another charming poster.

It's Saph!!!!!!:cmad: :cmad: :cmad:





:cwink:

[Showtime]

It's Saph! :cwink:



Not who I had in mind, but if you notice since I pointed out said similarities, the posted was edited at least twice. :dry:

[dude love]

Well I posted this thread, and I didn't say anything remotely close to that DL. I want a sequel, so you shouldn't group people together. It would be nice to get some more relevant news though. I understand everybody from Singer's camp has reported a sequel, but I mean some news on the actual movie, the direction it's going.

I don't care who wants a sequel, a prequel, a remake, a restart or a porno. It doesn't matter to me. So, I'm not grouping anyone together. Regardless of what anyone wants, it's still tiresome to see people making judgement calls without knowing anything. Tell me, would announcing Fantastic Four 3 mean Wolverine is doomed?

[Showtime]

I don't care who wants a sequel, a prequel, a remake, a restart or a porno. It doesn't matter to me. So, I'm not grouping anyone together. Regardless of what anyone wants, it's still tiresome to see people making judgement calls without knowing anything. Tell me, would announcing Fantastic Four 3 mean Wolverine is doomed?

That's the point, I didn't say the sequel was doomed because of a Teen Titan movie, you wrote in this thread which I posted,

And why does everyone have to post a thread about a DC movie in the Superman boards. "OMFG New Line is making a Shazam move! This means the superman sequel is DOOMED! lolz!!!!!!!11111shift+1"? Cripesonfriday, it's got nothing to do with Superman!

Yet I didn't open the thread and say the sequel was doomed, so I don't know what the hell you are talking about.

[dude love]

I'm not saying it was just you. Go back and look through this and other threads there's plenty of people who are saying the same thing.

[BareKnucklez]

I don't care who wants a sequel, a prequel, a remake, a restart or a porno. It doesn't matter to me. So, I'm not grouping anyone together. Regardless of what anyone wants, it's still tiresome to see people making judgement calls without knowing anything. Tell me, would announcing Fantastic Four 3 mean Wolverine is doomed?

um... I'll take the porno... :ninja:

[Showtime]

I'm not saying it was just you. Go back and look through this and other threads there's plenty of people who are saying the same thing.

DL, there are plenty of people saying it, but they can't be saying the same thing as me, because I didn't say the sequel was doomed in the first place? I don't know where you are getting this.

[Pickle-El]

Not who I had in mind, but if you notice since I pointed out said similarities, the posted was edited at least twice. :dry:

hehe.....I didn't even need to see that edited twice part of it.....I just knew. Like an obsessive-compulsive....check, re-check, and do it all over again.

But, I'm not naming any names....I'm probably WAAAAAAAAY off. And it probably is Saph.



:cwink:



(damn wink!)

[dude love]

DL, there are plenty of people saying it, but they can't be saying the same thing as me, because I didn't say the sequel was doomed in the first place? I don't know where you are getting this.

Well no you didn't say it, but you did open the flood gate with this thread and you couldn't possibly not have expected it.

[Showtime]

Well no you didn't say it, but you did open the flood gate with this thread and you couldn't possibly not have expected it.

Exactly. I didn't say it.

So before we post a thread or even a post for that matter, we now have to stop and think how other posters are going to react to it? If we feel that some posters may act irrationally or negative then we can't post said thread or post? The forums wouldnt have any threads then, they would be blank.

[GreenKToo]

:cmad: Dang...A teen titans movie means we won't get a superman sequel.:cwink: Exactly. I didn't say it.

So before we post a thread or even a post for that matter, we now have to stop and think how other posters are going to react to it? If we feel that some posters may act irrationally or negative then we can't post said thread or post? The forums wouldnt have any threads then, they would be blank.

[Iron Fist]

Jason as a Titan would be interesting, I guess.

[dude love]

Exactly. I didn't say it.

So before we post a thread or even a post for that matter, we now have to stop and think how other posters are going to react to it? If we feel that some posters may act irrationally or negative then we can't post said thread or post? The forums wouldnt have any threads then, they would be blank.

No you didn't say it. You just started a thread about a movie with no relevence to Superman for no other reason other than to give your take on the lack of news on the sequel of a movie that's barely as year old as it is. You're acting as if it's already June 2009 or something.

The last part's all well and true, but, if you look at, say, the Joker threads on the Batman forum, the difference is that Joker is relevant to TDK. Teen Titans is as relevant to Superman as Fantastic Four is to X-Men.

[Showtime]

No you didn't say it. You just started a thread about a movie with no relevence to Superman for no other reason other than to give your take on the lack of news on the sequel of a movie that's barely as year old as it is. You're acting as if it's already June 2009 or something.

The last part's all well and true, but, if you look at, say, the Joker threads on the Batman forum, the difference is that Joker is relevant to TDK. Teen Titans is as relevant to Superman as Fantastic Four is to X-Men.

Exactly that is the reason I opened the thread, I am asking why is there news on a movie that will probably never get made and not more news on a movie that is moving into pre-production. For some reason that really rubs you the wrong way. :dry:

So other threads that are made on these boards aren't created for the poster who started the thread to give their opinon on the subject and have other posters chime in with theirs? It's either that or news, that is what every thread on this forum contains. :huh:

I rarely open a thread, and when I do I will make sure I run it by you to see if it is relevant or not and if it lives up to your expectations and gets your stamp of approval. I didn't realize that you were hired as the Chief of the Thread Police, but now that I know I won't upset you again. You need to go check the relevance for some of these other threads, Excel's thread comes to mind. Make sure it's ok. :cwink:

[dude love]

It does rub me the wrong way. The movie's not due out for at least another two or three years. The first is only a bit short of becoming a year old. Is the undie soiling totally necessary?

I rarely open a thread, and when I do I will make sure I run it by you to see if it is relevant or not and if it lives up to your expectations and gets your stamp of approval. I didn't realize that you were hired as the Chief of the Thread Police, but now that I know I won't upset you again. You need to go check the relevance for some of these other threads, Excel's thread comes to mind. Make sure it's ok

Great, I'm a facist for getting annoyed at other peoples overreactions...

[Showtime]

It does rub me the wrong way. The movie's not due out for at least another two or three years. The first is only a bit short of becoming a year old. Is the undie soiling totally necessary?
Great, I'm a facist for getting annoyed at other peoples overreactions...

I don't know how I am overreacting, I want more news on a sequel. The Teen Titans news was a segway into my question regarding lack of some solid news. That would mean alot of people on the boards are overeacting on said subject. In reality the only overreaction came when you took it upon yourself to even get annoyed in the first place. It's a forum, it's one thread, which is almost exactly like every thread in every section of The Hype. There are threads much, much worse than this, which doesn't make this thread any better but means you have alot of work to do. Good luck.

[BareKnucklez]

I don't know how I am overreacting, I want more news on a sequel. The Teen Titans news was a segway into my question regarding lack of some solid news. That would mean alot of people on the boards are overeacting on said subject. In reality the only overreaction came when you took it upon yourself to even get annoyed in the first place. It's a forum, it's one thread, which is almost exactly like every thread in every section of The Hype. There are threads much, much worse than this, which doesn't make this thread any better but means you have alot of work to do. Good luck.


I find your lack of faith disturbing... http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e212/idrisenoch/choke-sm.jpg

Well actually not really disturbing! More like amusing.... I think the reason why no real solid news has come out from the WB is because they are in a "wait & see" position right now.

They will wait to see what The Hulk reboot does, and let these clowns "Mike, Dan, and Bryan" Crayola a script together before they announce anything.

[Showtime]

Let's follow an even less sucessful movie and see what they do to reboot it. That makes sense.

[buggs0268]

It does rub me the wrong way. The movie's not due out for at least another two or three years. The first is only a bit short of becoming a year old. Is the undie soiling totally necessary?



Great, I'm a facist for getting annoyed at other peoples overreactions...
Dude. What the hell are you all up in arms about. He is just asking a simple question. Why there is news on an Teen Titan's movie being greenlit, but no news on the sequel. I think the rumors are true, as Bareknucklez stated above, and we wont hear any real news for a while on the sequel. But there is no reason to jump on him for asking a question.

[dude love]

I don't know how I am overreacting, I want more news on a sequel. The Teen Titans news was a segway into my question regarding lack of some solid news.

News, for the sequel to a movie that's barely a year old that's not due out for two or three years. The crew of which are all working on different movies at the current moment...

The first step of my evil Nazi plan is to take this up over PM (Don't worry, no flamming or harrassing or anything like that).

[Angeloz]

News, for the sequel to a movie that's barely a year old that's not due out for two or three years. The crew of which are all working on different movies at the current moment...

The first step of my evil Nazi plan is to take this up over PM (Don't worry, no flamming or harrassing or anything like that).

Just vote no for John Howard. ;)

By the way I'm kidding as I know what you meant and for those of you wondering John Howard is the Prime Minister of Australia (like Blair in the U.K.) or is the PM.

Angeloz

[dude love]

I did vote Labour for the state election. If I had a real evil Nazi plan, I wouldn't vote 'no' for little Johnny either.

[Angeloz]

I did vote Labour for the state election. If I had a real evil Nazi plan, I wouldn't vote 'no' for little Johnny either.

:wow: I didn't think a British political party could have candidates in an Australian election. :oldrazz:

OK I'm being naughtily pedantic 'cos unless I'm mistaken we spell it Labor and they Labour. I don't know why but possibly to differentiate it from the word labour. {Shrug.}

Angeloz

[GreenKToo]

wars have started over less than that..:woot:
Sad thing is, it's true.:csad: :wow: I didn't think a British political party could have candidates in an Australian election. :oldrazz:

OK I'm being naughtily pedantic 'cos unless I'm mistaken we spell it Labor and they Labour. I don't know why but possibly to differentiate it from the word labour. {Shrug.}

Angeloz

[dude love]

:wow: I didn't think a British political party could have candidates in an Australian election. :oldrazz:

OK I'm being naughtily pedantic 'cos unless I'm mistaken we spell it Labor and they Labour. I don't know why but possibly to differentiate it from the word labour. {Shrug.}

Angeloz

Ha! Do you think I even bothered? I might as well have closed my eyes and ticked any box. I'm the most politically apathetic guy ever, beyond laughing at Bush jokes. Lemme guess, you're a Greenie? :oldrazz:

[merced]

Why there is news on an Teen Titan's movie being greenlit, but no news on the sequel.

Has Teen Titans gotten greenlit? It could be out by 2009 then.

[Spidey Lover 10]

http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773

Teen Titans to the Big Screen

Source: The Hollywood Reporter (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3ibdf0b7dd533b3de61add7273f8d79b81)
May 31, 2007



DC Comics' superteam Teen Titans (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) is getting the big-screen treatment courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures, says The Hollywood Reporter. The live-action adaptation is being produced by Akiva Goldsman and Kerry Foster through their Weed Road production company, while Mark Verheiden has been brought on board to write the script. The Teen Titans, which first appeared in 1964, are comprised of Robin, Kid Flash, Aqualad, Wonder Girl and Speedy, the respective sidekicks of A-list heroes Batman, Flash, Aquaman, Wonder Woman (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) and Green Arrow.

The comic series reached X-Men-style success in the 1980s, when the team was relaunched in a new comic with the characters no longer kids but college-age adults and the stories explored more mature themes. The series also saw the addition of Cyborg, Starfire and Raven, original characters who weren't sidekicks, while the character of Robin matured into one called Nightwing.Most recently, the comic was adapted to the television screen with a Cartoon Network (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) series that ran from 2003-06 that used many of the '80s comics' heroes and story lines.

It is not known which heroes will be used, but Nightwing is said to be in the mix. Goldsman said the tone will be consistent with such recent Warners' comic book (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#) fare as Batman Begins, Superman Returns and the upcoming Watchmen.Verheiden was a writer-producer on "Smallville" and is a writer-producer on "Battlestar Galactica (http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=5773#)."

(http://www.superherohype.com/forums/)

too early, bub/

[Angeloz]

Ha! Do you think I even bothered? I might as well have closed my eyes and ticked any box. I'm the most politically apathetic guy ever, beyond laughing at Bush jokes. Lemme guess, you're a Greenie? :oldrazz:

Let's just say I would be a Labor Party supporter but most of them are lawyers and influenced by business more than the workers seemingly these days. So I'm very disallusioned with the main Parties. By the way if I was Tasmanian (I'm not) I wouldn't be embarrassed by voting for Bob Brown 'cos he's intelligent, honest, has principles and isn't afraid to state them. But as stated I'm in the wrong state.

Edit: by the way is "Watchmen" confirmed? 'Cos it seems to be a yo-yo project - on again and off again.

Angeloz

[Showtime]

News, for the sequel to a movie that's barely a year old that's not due out for two or three years. The crew of which are all working on different movies at the current moment...

The first step of my evil Nazi plan is to take this up over PM (Don't worry, no flamming or harrassing or anything like that).

Nothing wrong with hoping for more news and expressing it, I think we all hope for more news. It was just a simple question of why news on a project that will never get off the ground most likely, and nothing on a sequel that is supposed to be moving along. Opened up for discussion. That is what the board is all about.

Anyway, appreciate the PM, no problems between me and you. I apologize for the rants and raves, just as real life in conversation, sometimes I can go on and on. :heart:

[Showtime]

Dude. What the hell are you all up in arms about. He is just asking a simple question. Why there is news on an Teen Titan's movie being greenlit, but no news on the sequel. I think the rumors are true, as Bareknucklez stated above, and we wont hear any real news for a while on the sequel. But there is no reason to jump on him for asking a question.

Thanks Buggs. It's very appreciated. I know we disagree on alot of subjects, but it's nice to see that you still respect me as I still respect you. :yay:

[Angeloz]

Nothing wrong with hoping for more news and expressing it, I think we all hope for more news. It was just a simple question of why news on a project that will never get off the ground most likely, and nothing on a sequel that is supposed to be moving along. Opened up for discussion. That is what the board is all about.

Anyway, appreciate the PM, no problems between me and you. I apologize for the rants and raves, just as real life in conversation, sometimes I can go on and on. :heart:

Does that mean you'll have an internet marriage? So it only lasts 2-3 months at best. ;) :oldrazz: :D

Thanks Buggs. It's very appreciated. I know we disagree on alot of subjects, but it's nice to see that you still respect me as I still respect you. :yay:

Cheating already? :D


Angeloz

[Showtime]

Is there such thing as an internet marriage? I only am into women and I have only been into one for the past 6 years. Nothing wrong with being into guys if you are a guy or a lady. That is what is great about the U.S., we are free to choose our lifestyle.

[Angeloz]

Is there such thing as an internet marriage? I only am into women and I have only been into one for the past 6 years. Nothing wrong with being into guys if you are a guy or a lady. That is what is great about the U.S., we are free to choose our lifestyle.

I saw a current affairs report on Second Life (the place some people supposedly live online). It has internet sex as well as marriage. They said most marriages last three months or something. But I was kidding.

Though is "Watchmen" on again as a project? To be more serious.

Angeloz

[Showtime]

I saw a current affairs report on Second Life (the place some people supposedly live online). It has internet sex as well as marriage. They said most marriages last three months or something. But I was kidding.

Though is "Watchmen" on again as a project? To be more serious.

Angeloz

That is quite odd. I never knew that, about internet marriage.

I think the Watchmen is more on and off again.

[Angeloz]

That is quite odd. I never knew that, about internet marriage.

I think the Watchmen is more on and off again.

So it's a coin toss? Do they have Two Face deciding? Though blowing up New York or parts of it might be a problem. It's spooky that he was right about that kind of disaster as well as pirates being popular. However it's been too long since I read it to really comment on it (I read it years before September 11).

Angeloz

[buggs0268]

What all the changes that the WB is doing is telling me that they don't have faith in a SR sequel. Before the movie came out, it was movies on the telling of all the main Justice League Hereos. Now it looks like they are going with heroes that are more current. And, unlike Marvel, who has many studios financing their films, DC is owned by the WB, and the WB has to pick and chose which ones to finance. Just one studio.

[Angeloz]

When is the Comic Con? 'Cos I read in a thread here or elsewhere there may be news with Singer. But don't know how true it is.

Angeloz

[Steelsheen]

When is the Comic Con? 'Cos I read in a thread here or elsewhere there may be news with Singer. But don't know how true it is.

Angeloz

July 26-29

[\S/JcDc\S/]

Think about this too, when Comic con is going on there will surely be an announcement how SR has now been out for a year... Thus prompting discussion on what's up with the sequel MOS.

[merced]

Think about this too, when Comic con is going on there will surely be an announcement how SR has now been out for a year... Thus prompting discussion on what's up with the sequel MOS.

I got the impression from Saturn interview that no work is being done now on SR2. The script won't be written until towards end of year and Singer has set up home in Germany doing fulltime on Cruise film. I don't think there will be new stuff to tell by comicon. I think new news will start up by year end.

[Excel]

LOL wbs not waiting to see how hulk does; their just waiting for a good idea.

[Showtime]

WB is waiting for Hulk like Paris Hilton is looking forward to her first shower in jail.

[ThanosOfTitans]

LOL wbs not waiting to see how hulk does; their just waiting for a good idea.

Don't know if that was intended to be funny, but it tickled me. lol

[dude love]

WB is waiting for Hulk like Paris Hilton is looking forward to her first shower in jail.

I don't think that's a good comparison. Paris Hilton probably is looking forward to her first shower in prison.

[Showtime]

I don't think that's a good comparison. Paris Hilton probably is looking forward to her first shower in prison.

Very true.

[Angeloz]

July 26-29

Thanks though I'll probably forget it. :)

Angeloz

[MargotFan]

Just wondering if there is already a script and time frame for shooting???

[Showtime]

No script, and no real time frame.

[matthooper]

Singer has a full plate for now as well. At least 2 other movies during the next few years.

A script and a time frame are a long way off because the film has not even been greenlit.

[dude love]

Singer has a full plate for now as well. At least 2 other movies during the next few years.

Singer himself said he's just doing Valkyrie before SR2.

A script and a time frame are a long way off because the film has not even been greenlit.

Don't they have to finish the script first before they get a greenlight?