Kenneth Branagh to direct Thor

[Lighthouse]

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117993032.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

Branagh in talks to direct 'Thor'
Brit set to wield hammer on Marvel Studios pic
By MICHAEL FLEMING

Kenneth Branagh is negotiating to direct "Thor," the next Marvel Comics property that will be turned into a live-action film by Marvel Studios. Pic will be released in 2010.

Marvel Studios chief Kevin Feige's choice of Branagh is surprising, as Branagh hasn't really directed an action-heavy film since his debut on "Henry V," a bloody telling of the British king's conquest of France.

Branagh is the latest in a string of directors -- such as Jon Favreau ("Iron Man"), Christopher Nolan (the Batman franchise) and Gavin Hood ("X-Men Origins: Wolverine") -- with arthouse roots taking on big-budget comicbook fare.

Marvel will set a distributor for "Thor" shortly.

"Thor" comicbook adaptation, penned by Mark Protosevich, follows disabled medical student Donald Blake, who has an alter ego as the hammer-wielding Norse god Thor.

Marvel will self-finance the film via its $500 million credit facility through Merrill Lynch. Marvel used that coin to fund both "Iron Man" and "The Incredible Hulk" and will do the same for the "Iron Man" sequel that has director Favreau and star Robert Downey Jr. returning.

The "Thor" negotiations come during a resurgence for Branagh. He's currently drawing raves on the London stage in the title role of "Ivanov," and he'll next be seen acting in the Richard Curtis-directed "The Boat That Rocked" and the Bryan Singer-helmed "Valkyrie."

I'm completely divided on this choice. I think his "Hamlet" and "Henry V" are the best Shakespeare movies ever made, and he's a pretty solid director, but he's had some pretty terrible movies as well. Lets just hope he doesn't pull a Frankenstein.

[Chewy]

I just saw this elsewhere and came here to post it. Out of left field, kinda like Favs. I like.

[Lighthouse]

Is it just me, or is anyone else getting a password screen when they try to visit Variety?

[Franklin Richards]

This is great news for Thor fans.

:up:


:thing: :doom: :thing:

[Chewy]

I was, I think the site was down for about 5 minutes. It's back up now.

[CHEZ]

How is Kenneth Branagh a good choice?

I'm not against him, I just don't understand how this is great news.

This has come completely out of left field.

[Chewy]

I'm just glad it isn't Brett Ratner.

[Lighthouse]

How is Kenneth Branagh a good choice?

I'm not against him, I just don't understand how this is great news.

This has come completely out of left field.

Yeah I'm pretty split on it. He's been a pretty hit and miss director.

Man, its really weird. I can't get back on to Variety.

[CaptainStacy]

This should be on the front page!

[bunk]

Professor Lockhart? I haven't seen any of the movies he directed.

[Project862006]

Gore Verbinski should direct a super hero movie

[Lighthouse]

Gore Verbinski should direct a super hero movie

He's gonna be busy with Bioshock.

[Negrotigre]

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117993032.html?categoryid=13&cs=1



I'm completely divided on this choice. I think his "Hamlet" and "Henry V" are the best Shakespeare movies ever made, and he's a pretty solid director, but he's had some pretty terrible movies as well. Lets just hope he doesn't pull a Frankenstein.

Totally agree; Hamlet was a master work of acting and direction. But he can get on a tangent sometimes and come up with a Frankenstein, or just overact his butt off on occasion. Reign him in and things can be good. One thing's for sure, Marvel's definitely thinking outside of the box and using people with real talent.

[LostSon88]

Interesting.

But isn't he known moreso for being an actor?

[CaptainStacy]

How is Kenneth Branagh a good choice?


I think it's a good choice in that he's heavily involved, professionally and socially, with many quality actors whom he would be able to bring aboard the project, plus he has MANY years expierience as both an actor AND director...

[Matt Mortem]

Interesting.

But isn't he known moreso for being an actor?
yes and no. He's directed alot of shakespearian movies which were all amazing

[The Major]

I think it's a good choice in that he's heavily involved, professionally and socially, with many quality actors whom he would be able to bring aboard the project, plus he has MANY years expierience as both an actor AND director...

Agreed.

It would be a great boon for Marvel to have him direct Thor.

[Sava]

wow...shocked, i hope he can pull it off.

[KangConquers]

best news for this movie so far...sure Branaugh has had some misses...but this is a guy who's created legitimate cinematic classics.

See Henry V or Hamlet and tell me Branagh is a poor choice.

[Kevin Roegele]

Marvel need to be careful this isn't an Ang Lee Hulk all over again. A great director, but not a commercial one. Can Branagh do an action adventure movie?

[Neto Magnus]

say whaaaa?:wow: I hope he plays Loki too.

[Gotham]

This is certainly out of left field.

I'm very happy, however. It's very reminiscent of Favreau taking on Iron Man, and I'm eager to see Branagh's vision for this character.

[Metamorpho1977]

Marvel need to be careful this isn't an Ang Lee Hulk all over again. A great director, but not a commercial one. Can Branagh do an action adventure movie?

This is what I'm afraid of. Branagh is a capable director, and I think he can do it as long as he don't do like Ang Lee, and over think the characters.

[Compi716]

This is veeeerrrrrrrry interesting. I can't wait to hear what Branagh has to say regarding Thor.

[Lighthouse]

I think it's a good choice in that he's heavily involved, professionally and socially, with many quality actors whom he would be able to bring aboard the project, plus he has MANY years expierience as both an actor AND director...

It hadn't occurred to me that he could bring a lot of talent to Thor. If anyone can bring good actors to a project, its Branagh.

[Franklin Richards]

The only way Thor will work is if it's a period piece. Who better for a period piece than a Shakespearean Actor / Director. He'll make sure all those thee's and thou's are at least iambic.

This is great news. Please let him get it.


:thing: :doom: :thing:

[Metamorpho1977]

I'd like the first movie be a period piece too. There hasn't been a good fantasy and magic movie since Willow.

[KangConquers]

I'd like the first movie be a period piece too. There hasn't been a good fantasy and magic movie since Willow.

Lord of The Rings? :huh:

[chiefchirpa]

I think this shows why Thor is more likely going to be delayed - Marvel has difficulty finding the director.

[LostSon88]

Um...they've found their director. Do you not see the thread title?

:huh:

[[A]]

some people says he's in talks, some people tells this as a fact, I don't know yet--but I like the idea

[Devil]

Branagh is a great director. "Hamlet" & "Henry V" are the best Shakespeare's movies. Simply great. To me, he can works on "Thor" because he's a director on 360° (plot, romance, action, violence). I think he can works and now (if he will be the director with confirmation!) i can't wait for the movie!

[[A]]

Yeah, now it's a whole different story for me

[The Chibi Kiriyama]

Marvel need to be careful this isn't an Ang Lee Hulk all over again. A great director, but not a commercial one. Can Branagh do an action adventure movie?

The thing with Hulk, though, was that a dramatic director was directing a script that had very sporadic action at best. This script has a very good pace as far as action goes. So it's just a matter of hoping he's up to chops on the special effects, which doesn't seem to be an issue if Marvel is seriously considering his vision for this movie.

[Wolfman]

Branagh just might deliver a great movie. But he can make it really boring too... Is he a big Thor comicbook fan or what, btw? Why did he took this job?

[bapi]

WTF?!?!?!? His Sleuth (starring Jude Law and Michael Caine) is the most stupid film what I saaw in last 10 years! Stupid choice!

[Chris Wallace]

I'm reserving judgement-cautiously optimistic.

[Peyton Westlake]

I dont remember anyone saying Favreau was the ultimate choice & look how his movie turned out.

[chamber-music]

I like the idea of Kenneth Branagh. His Shakespeare movies are great, he always attracts brilliant actors and I think his Frankenstein was pretty good.

Branagh is the go to guy for playing Nazis. He must of played more Nazis than any other actor I can think of.

He was good in Rabbit-Proof Fence too.


For The movie Swing Kids
Kenneth Branagh (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Branagh) is uncredited in the role of Herr Knopp — he refused billing after being told he'd be billed above the younger stars, saying that the boys were the real stars of the film and it belonged to them only. Branagh had worked with both Robert Sean Leonard and Christian Bale previously in Much Ado About Nothing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Ado_About_Nothing_(film)) (with Leonard) and Henry V (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_V_(1989_film)) (with Bale).

[Docker2.0]

Um...they've found their director. Do you not see the thread title?

:huh:

Thanks for giving me a laugh! :grin: I think this is a great choice actually. Marvel seems to be going after little known but talented directors and seeking A-list actors. I think they got rid of Vaughn becuase dude wouldn't come down off of that $300 Million budget....and it was the right decision! I mean, Stardust looked amazing but it didn't make half its budget back! The thing I'm curious about also is how in the heck is this going to tie in with IM, Cap and the Avengers. This is a story about magic, elves, and trolls....not corporate crooks and spies.

[bapi]

I dont remember anyone saying Favreau was the ultimate choice & look how his movie turned out.

Iron Man is an average... for me. Nothing unique.

[TheComicbookKid]

Well, I guess we'll be getting updates since he's staring in Valkyrie so he'll be getting a lot of questions at the press junket.

He can ask his friend Bryan Singer for help directing!!!:whatever::yay:

[Casius--J]

Very interesting choice, I think he could do a good job but i'm concered for the action sequences a little. I guess its a wait and see situation, and I agree with one of the posters, this reminds me of when we heard that Jon Favreau was signed to iron man!

[Nivek]

Great Choice, lets see if he casts Thor with another actor, or he ends up being CG modified into the character.

[Rust]

Well, it made ME all giddy. I dont know why really, because I'm not sure he's the right director for a movie like this or movies like these.

I'm just glad and proud that superhero-movies are getting prominent people attached to them these days.
Brannagh on THOR definitely is a straaange choice, but absolutely interesting and stimulating. At least it wont turn into a cheesy americanized action-yarn as I see it. And it'll probably still be a "shakespear'ean" LOTR-style fantasy and no Blake. Thank the Maker.

[spider-neil]

fantastic choice.
my hope is he leans towards norse mythology (loki, odin, hela) and less towards the marvel universe (spidey, hulk FF) because in the thor comics by far the best run was simonson and that was dripping with norse mythology.

[Evil Twin]

Interesting choice. Definitely suggesting that they have something classical in mind for the character. Not an idea that would have ever occurred to me and Branagh has had his share of big missteps over the year, but it certainly suggests that they're not aiming for a by the numbers approach.

And I think we can definitely assume that Branagh isn't going to cast a bodybuilder as Thor.

[ttotheusher]

I can honestly say this is the most bombastic, bat-**** brilliant news I've heard in a long time. So left-field, but in an amazing way. And for those who say he's hit-and-miss, shall I remind you of the position we were in when Favs was announced for Iron Man? What about his track record? Elf? Zathura? Both brilliant films, but not what you'd call Iron Man-material, and look how that turned out. I am highly anticipating what he's got to say on the project.

[Vartha]

I want to know where these reporters are getting that Blake's in the Film, because he was NOWHERE in the 1st draft.
heh anyone have a final draft? lol

[bunk]

The thing with Hulk, though, was that a dramatic director was directing a script that had very sporadic action at best. This script has a very good pace as far as action goes. So it's just a matter of hoping he's up to chops on the special effects, which doesn't seem to be an issue if Marvel is seriously considering his vision for this movie.


This would be my main concern. Can he handle this large of a movie and how well can he deal with visual effects? I haven't read any version of the script so I don't know how much CG could be involved.

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

Totally shocked by this news, really someone I think pretty much no one would have though of to direct a Thor movie, but we'll see how it goes.

[Marz69]

"Thor" comicbook adaptation, penned by Mark Protosevich, follows disabled medical student Donald Blake, who has an alter ego as the hammer-wielding Norse god Thor.
Sounds like a script change. I like the idea of having Donald Blake in it.

Interesting choice for director. I think it shows that Marvel is taking this seriously and not just throwing crap together. KB should be able to bring Thor's style & verbage to the screen w/o it being cheesy.

It's great to hear some news. Now we just need an actor for Thor & I feel good that we'll hear something by the end of the year. :woot:

[Symbiotic]

Interesting choice.

[fabman]

This is great news! Finally Marvel got it. This is gonna be very interesting, guys!

[Metamorpho1977]

Lord of The Rings? :huh:

ok, besides LOTR.

[chamber-music]

This would be my main concern. Can he handle this large of a movie and how well can he deal with visual effects? I haven't read any version of the script so I don't know how much CG could be involved.

Well we know he can handle big films in terms of big battle scenes with multiple actors and stuff from Henry V but that was a long time ago. Branagh has worked in big special effects movies as an actor and the guys pretty well connected in terms of who he can call up in Hollywood so I'm sure can get a good production team behind him who can fill in any of the gaps he doesn't know.

If Christopher Nolan can make a big budget superhero movie I see no reason why Branagh couldn't. Who thought Peter Jackson could make the Lotr films from his previous work?

I think Branagh has got it in him.

[Spider-Fan]

Wow, what an out of left field choice, so it would seem. But, Branagh I think is the right man for this job. He directed that huge adaptation of Hamlet back in the 90's, and can definately get the Asgardian dialect down. I think his Frankenstein movie is very underrated, also. He is also well respected, and will attract talent. And boy, would he make a great Loki *salivates*

Marvel does it again with directorial picks. I am 1000% behind this choice :up:

[Canis Sapiens]

That's a great choice. Even though Brannagh made Frankenstein, he made a lot of awesome movies. He's more talented than 90% of the directors working in Hollywood today.

As for Variety's mention of Donald Blake, IMO it was mostly drawn from the article writer looking up THE MIGHTY THOR and reading that was his terrestrial identity.

Harry at aintitcool.com said that, having read 2 drafts (I've read the first), there is no Donald Blake - and no room for him.

[Marz69]

As for Variety's mention of Donald Blake, IMO it was mostly drawn from the article writer looking up THE MIGHTY THOR and reading that was his terrestrial identity.

Harry at aintitcool.com said that, having read 2 drafts (I've read the first), there is no Donald Blake - and no room for him.
So there's no Donald. :huh:

Now I have to go back to my first choice of picking a tall actor who can get build with the 300 diet. Alexander Skarsgard (6'4"). :woot:

[CaptainStacy]

Well we know he can handle big films in terms of big battle scenes with multiple actors and stuff from Henry V but that was a long time ago. Branagh has worked in big special effects movies as an actor and the guys pretty well connected in terms of who he can call up in Hollywood so I'm sure can get a good production team behind him who can fill in any of the gaps he doesn't know.


Exactly.

[MarvelMovies]

Interesting choice...

I haven't really seen much of his work, but I definitely expected somebody a little more familiar. Granted, Favreau and Letterier weren't exactly big-budget well-known movie directors either; and that worked out well.

[Dr. Watson]

I think Branagh is a great choice. An added bonus is that he will be able to bring a high quality cadre of actors with him.

Question, somewhat related: Will the Avengers/Thor be getting its own sub forum soon? Seems like we've had enough annoucements and certifiable news that it should have its own space :)

[Kevin Roegele]

The thing with Hulk, though, was that a dramatic director was directing a script that had very sporadic action at best. This script has a very good pace as far as action goes. So it's just a matter of hoping he's up to chops on the special effects, which doesn't seem to be an issue if Marvel is seriously considering his vision for this movie.

I wish it were that simple. I'm sure you've seen Batman & Robin, and Terminator 2. A director can either do action, or he can't. It's not just a question of budget.

[Nirvana]

I've never seen a movie directed by this guy. The only exposure I have to him is Dr. Loveless :dry:

Let's see what he can do. I have faith. :up:

[R_Hythlodeus]

I think Branagh is a great choice. An added bonus is that he will be able to bring a high quality cadre of actors with him.

Question, somewhat related: Will the Avengers/Thor be getting its own sub forum soon? Seems like we've had enough annoucements and certifiable news that it should have its own space :)
qft

[Brian Braddock]

Wow.

Would never in a million years have connected Branagh to Thor. The more I think about it, the more I like it.

One things for sure, Branagh would certainly give a Thor movie epic grandeur. Imagine seeing his name on the posters? It's like a seal of class. You just know the acting will be top notch as Branagh doesnt suffer any >acting< fools.

The only reservation that I might have is that I wonder how much of an actual Thor fan is Branagh? If he isnt a fan, Will he take away a lot of the 'comic-booky' elements of Thor that we all know and love?

[Colossal Spoons]

Should I be excited? I have no idea who this man is lol

[Chris Wallace]

This would be my main concern. Can he handle this large of a movie and how well can he deal with visual effects? I haven't read any version of the script so I don't know how much CG could be involved.

I'm reminded of something Raimi once said; I don't remember his exact words but the gist was, it's one thing to say you don't like how my kid turned out. It's another to come into my bedroom while the child is being conceived & say you don't like how my kid is going to turn out.

[bunk]

I have no idea how that's relevant to what I said.

[Chris Wallace]

Should I be excited? I have no idea who this man is lol

Here he is in Frankenstein.
http://i485.photobucket.com/albums/rr217/helena_stamps/elizabethfrankenstein.jpg
And here in Othello.
http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg220/KellySmith252005/othello-iago.jpg
And in the critically acclaimed blockbuster, Wild Wild West.
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i283/ghostofjealousy/bionic2.jpg
J/K. But seriously, here you go.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Branagh

[Colossal Spoons]

Ah ha, Loveless

[Chris Wallace]

I have no idea how that's relevant to what I said.
Skepticism may be premature.

[Chris Wallace]

Ah ha, Loveless

That you know, but you don't know the name? You should be ashamed of yourself.
:oldrazz:J/K.

[Colossal Spoons]

That you know, but you don't know the name? You should be ashamed of yourself.
:oldrazz:J/K.

Haha, I know. I looked up the stuff he has directed and I'm not familiar w/ much of it. This news is neutral to me.

[chiefchirpa]

I'm sure Branagh gets typecasted because of old Thor Shakespearean talk.

[bunk]

Skepticism may be premature.

What skepticism? I haven't seen one of his movies so I asked a couple of simple questions. I clearly didn't express any displeasure so I don't know what you're getting upset about.

[marcvader]

I hope he's doing this cuz he's got a genuine interest in the material and not just cuz it's the thing to do these days after TDK and IM. I don't know what think until I here what he's got to say about Thor and Marvel's desire to tie there properties together. At least with Favreau you could feel his love for the material having grown up being a fan of Marvel comics.

[Rust]

The only reservation that I might have is that I wonder how much of an actual Thor fan is Branagh? If he isnt a fan, Will he take away a lot of the 'comic-booky' elements of Thor that we all know and love?

That's what I'm thinking about too. Not reserved or worried at all though, I prefer a more non-"comicbooky" THOR, but I can't really imagine Branagh as a comicbook-fan as such either.
I imagine he'll make it more fantasy than comicbook and let it be inspired by the norse mythology. This sounds most probable, but still, it IS a Marvel-movie... Very odd indeed. I guess the current script is what counts at Marvel and it may have attracted Branagh. I dunno...

[Brian Braddock]

You never know though - there is definatley a generation of well known British thesps who have grown up reading Marvel U.K. reprints.

The idea that Branagh grew up reading Thor comics isnt totally absurd. Given Branagh's age; it would probably have been the Buscema stuff too.

Nice

:D

[Rust]

I can't wait to hear what Branagh's angle is. If he's a fan of the comicbook then that's a pleasant surprise. If he's likes the script enough to want to direct it, then it must be a badass script. Both scenarios rock.

Of course, the whole rumor could be just that.

[Brian Braddock]

Yeah. It could all just be rumour.

Normally, I treat these things with cynacism and skepticsm but for once; I'm gonna run with it.

I like the idea that much, I'm prepared to be dissapointed if it turns out to be false.

[Rust]

I agree, it's a benign rumor. :)

[DocHoliday]

This could work out...he might even be able to keep the budget down.

[BenReilly19]

Branagh in talks to direct Thor isn't a rumor, it's legit.

Variety broke this story. Their the top industry trade and they get their information straight from the studios.

[Brian Braddock]

Hopefully these talks bear fruit then.

[AndThePickles]

Hmm, odd choice of director, but I'm guessing they're hoping he can bring the classic mythology feel to life.

[Brian Braddock]

Given his previous work, Branagh'll definately make sure the thou's and the dost's sound right.

:D

[Rust]

Hmm, odd choice of director, but I'm guessing they're hoping he can bring the classic mythology feel to life.

Yeah, so the Marvel-purists probably shouldn't expect the below from Branagh.

http://www.webmetricsguru.com/uploads/Thor.JPG


But hopefully not the below either.


http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images1/thor3_sm.jpg

[Brian Braddock]

Yeah, so the Marvel-purists probably shouldn't expect the below from Branagh.

http://www.webmetricsguru.com/uploads/Thor.JPG





To be honest, I think the people on this board who honestly expected to something like that ^ are in the minority.

However, expecting to see something like this:-


http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/thor20ages20of20thunder_preview.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/3077new_storyimage7244584_full.jpg

Probably isn't too absurd.

[Rust]

I could live with that.

Boy, I hope Branagh isn't eyeing the THOR-part himself. :whatever:

[KangConquers]

for those showing skepticism because you haven't seen a branagh movie, that's more on you than on him. He's responsible for some legit classics that any film lover should be aware of. Anyone over 40 would recognize his name.

About the norse Thor vs. Superhero Thor debate, having read the script, I can simplify this by saying he starts out the Norse Thor, but at the end, he is the superhero Thor, ready to go into the Avengers movie. Loki also gradually becomes supervillain Loki (bad ass scene where he dons his horns for the first time.)

[spider-neil]

recommended reads for branagh

definately the simonson run, especially where thor goes to hel and when surtur attacks asgard.

[Brian Braddock]

I doubt it, Rust; I know some articles out there have tried to cause mischief and spark outrage amongst fanboys (as befits Loki) by suggesting the possibility but given what we know of the script - Branagh would be too old for the role.

On top of being totally unsuitable, obviously.

[KangConquers]

recommended reads for branagh

definately the simonson run, especially where thor goes to hel and when surtur attacks asgard.

Unless they rewrite the script, I wouldn't expect too much of that.

[Rust]

Hmmm, could Branagh be pulling an Ang Lee?
His HULK-announcement was equally baffling.
I hope this wont mean a too dialogue-heavy and "british" classy Thor with no "bar-brawling" or cgi-mayhem.

[Philly Phanboy]

Cautiously optimistic with this news. At least with Branagh the chances of a wrestler cast cheese fest are nil.

Kinda surprised too with them going from Vaughn to Branagh. Is there some evidence that this movie has already been fated to be filmed in England?

[Brian Braddock]

Not sure about England but I can definately see Scotland (highlands) being used.

[Gatchamanjp]

I like the choice of Kenneth Branagh to direct Thor. Hopefully all the shakespearian dialogue is kept intact. Sure Thor's costume does not have to be a replica of the comics...but he should still wear a cape, carry his hammer, and wear some kind of helmet.

[cerealkiller182]

Branagh definitely has an eye for aestheically interesting "olde time" atmospheres (ie Frankenstein and Hamlet). But Im pretty sure he has a reputation of being over controlling and making sure he gets his way. I feel like he could run amok with the material. Frankenstein wasnt exactly true to its source. Hes got potential for Thor though.

[cerealkiller182]

To be honest, I think the people on this board who honestly expected to something like that ^ are in the minority.

However, expecting to see something like this:-


http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/thor20ages20of20thunder_preview.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/3077new_storyimage7244584_full.jpg

Probably isn't too absurd.

agreed, thats definitely the one i'd like but I expect something with more armor like this:
http://blog.ugo.com/images/uploads/thor_marvelcomics.jpg

[[A]]

I liked his Frankestein. There. I said it.

[R_Hythlodeus]

It´s the best news I´ve heard in a while. Branagh is a great actor/director. And it will minimize the risk of a subpar casting (i.e. brad pitt or some wrestler)

[CaptainCanada]

Hopefully all the shakespearian dialogue is kept intact.
Almost no chance of that, I suspect. Even the comics have stopped using it.

Branagh would be an excellent choice for this sort of film, although, for my money, he has never topped his debut film, Henry V.

[Brian Braddock]

No time like the present then.

[Spider-Fan]

His Henry V is a classic though. Kind of hard to top a classic.

[Brian Braddock]

Make a new classic that's even better.

:D

[Spider-Fan]

I think this will be a classis relative to the comic movie genre now. I can't say enough about this choice. My brother is an actor, and absolutely loves all things Branagh, so I am probably more familiar with his work than most of the hype.

But, this will be amazing. He also has a habit of putting himself in big roles in his movies. I hope he casts himself as Loki :up:

[bunk]

It's nice to get some Thor news either way. And nice to see that Marvel is continuing to think outside the box for the most part.

[Brian Braddock]

I think this will be a classis relative to the comic movie genre now. I can't say enough about this choice. My brother is an actor, and absolutely loves all things Branagh, so I am probably more familiar with his work than most of the hype.

But, this will be amazing. He also has a habit of putting himself in big roles in his movies. I hope he casts himself as Loki :up:


http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/440px-Fandral_Head.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/hamlet96.jpg

:cwink:

[Spider-Fan]

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/440px-Fandral_Head.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/hamlet96.jpg

:cwink:

LOL :woot:

He'd be an amazing Loki though. I am really looking forward to this now :up:

[Canis Sapiens]

I liked his Frankestein. There. I said it.


I don't hate it... :woot:

[Canis Sapiens]

It´s the best news I´ve heard in a while. Branagh is a great actor/director. And it will minimize the risk of a subpar casting (i.e. brad pitt or some wrestler)

Yeah, it's about time the good people in here stop suggesting Triple H for Thor.
:oldrazz:

[[A]]

It´s the best news I´ve heard in a while. Branagh is a great actor/director. And it will minimize the risk of a subpar casting (i.e. brad pitt or some wrestler)

Couldn't agree more.

[KenshinAtrain]

^^ that thought needs to die...no wrestlers for these roles

[[A]]

No wrestlers for any role!

[Spider-Fan]

Branagh is going to cast and attract GOOD actors. Thus, no Triple H.

[KenshinAtrain]

Thank the gods for that

[KangConquers]

No wrestlers for any role!

Nah. Wrestlers are perfect for henchmen, stand ins, monsters etc. Roles like Skurge the Executioner, The Wrecking Crew and others would be perfectly suited for a pro-wrestler.

I have a lot of respect for wrestling; it's a form of entertainment I've loved since I was 3. But when my friends go "Oh, Triple H isn't good enough for a movie huh?" I go "Would you like to see Daniel Day Lewis as WWE Champion?"

and they shut up :woot:

[Hypestyle]

great news, so will he revise the script for the shakespearean dialogue, or leave it as is?

will this be an Asgard-only film? will it deal with the blake connection at all? will it be the Ultimates version?

I hope Sif is in it and she's hot..

[Chris Wallace]

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/440px-Fandral_Head.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/hamlet96.jpg

:cwink:

I can see it.

[KenshinAtrain]

meh i miss the 90's days of wrestling...its blatantly fake now..hell u can get spoilers of how stories are gonna pan in matches nowadays. its just become way to soap operaish for me , and im a guy who likes soap operas. give me the good ole days of the hart brothers, flyin brian, macho man ;before he got all weird and roidy looking as seen in spider-man; hulk hogan etc...

[Chris Wallace]

What skepticism? I haven't seen one of his movies so I asked a couple of simple questions. I clearly didn't express any displeasure so I don't know what you're getting upset about.

I said you seemed skeptical, not Negative Nancy. I've reached a point where I try not to be too skeptical early on, as I was so wrong about Iron Man. But you seem to feel that I misread you so I apologize.

[chamber-music]

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/440px-Fandral_Head.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/hamlet96.jpg

:cwink:
He doesn't look like that anymore
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=CKpVWWcLBuQ
Should I be excited? I have no idea who this man is lol
He was in Harry Potter :woot:

[[A]]

Is he really so unknown for americans..? :huh:

[Rac]

Really interesting choice! Very left-field.

And I just realized something: I've never seen any of the movies his directed. And the only movie where he acts (not directing) that I've seen is The Road to El Dorado. Oh, and WWW...

[marcvader]

He's been lowkey here in the US for sometime. He was much more visible back in the nineties.

[Sawyer]

I can dig it.

[KenshinAtrain]

Is he really so unknown for americans..? :huh:
i know who he is but then again im a big shakespeare fan...loved his portrayal of Iago in Othello and of course Hamlet is plain awesome...i think he could be a good fit for this film

[Dr Strange]

This to me is a great choice, i love Branagh's work and i believe he can pull it off, plus i do think it would be quite cool to see him as Loki, heck i would love him as Odin.

[CaptainStacy]

To be honest, I think the people on this board who honestly expected to something like that ^ are in the minority.

However, expecting to see something like this:-


http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/thor20ages20of20thunder_preview.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/3077new_storyimage7244584_full.jpg

Probably isn't too absurd.

That would rule. :word:

[[A]]

i know who he is but then again im a big shakespeare fan...loved his portrayal of Iago in Othello and of course Hamlet is plain awesome...i think he could be a good fit for this film
But he's been in other movies, not onky Shakespeare material--like Gingerbread Man, The Proposition or The Theory of Flight. He's gonna be in Valkyrie too.

[CaptainStacy]

I doubt it, Rust; I know some articles out there have tried to cause mischief and spark outrage amongst fanboys (as befits Loki) by suggesting the possibility but given what we know of the script - Branagh would be too old for the role.


Not too old to play Odin, methinks. :word:

[Chris Wallace]

Is anyone?
As long as they don't get Bob Hoskins or Alan Cumming again.

[marcvader]

It feels great to be getting all this news for the Thor movie and I can't imagine how it will get around here when we get official news for Cap's film next year. It's going to be nuts.

[[A]]

So.. you think we're getting more Marvel news soon? Heh, I'm asking just for fun.. Next news: Captain America related

[Kane]

I say good choice for a director for Thor. I like Branagh. Henry V is an excellent movie! I really hope this turns out good. I hope they stick pretty closely to Mark Protosevich's first draft. I thought it was very good.

[marcvader]

So.. you think we're getting more Marvel news soon? Heh, I'm asking just for fun.. Next news: Captain America related
Nah. but I hope we get it sometime next summer/fall.:woot:

[DocHoliday]

I know of him but then again I am a huge film fan.

[Raiden]

It's a great news, and I hope it will indeed happen.

[Compi716]

Does anybody think that, if this Thor film does include the Donal Blake story, they may change that up a bit? For example, instead of making him a medical student, how about an actual doctor?

I ask because, if that were to be a particular change, I can see Branagh playing Blake.

[[A]]

They usually make a mix of different stories/origins, right..?

[BizarroAids]

I like Branaughs unique way of storytelling. So I'm sure he'll be able to pull off a nice epic style Thor film.

Also, I too think he would be a nice Loki.

[KenshinAtrain]

But he's been in other movies, not onky Shakespeare material--like Gingerbread Man, The Proposition or The Theory of Flight. He's gonna be in Valkyrie too.
Ahh yes i remember those as well...gotta look into Valkyrie some more have not been really following what its about and all....too busy

[[A]]

He was also in Celebrity but.. I deliberately skipped mentioning that one :oldrazz:

[KenshinAtrain]

never heard of that one

[broblacksteel]

This is great news, he can cover the asgard portion of the film due to the drama and shakespearian language...PLUS he will bring more of a serious tone to the earth settings/story. All he needs is a good action director/team to cover the fights and he can concentrate on the story.

[BizarroAids]

He was also in Celebrity but.. I deliberately skipped mentioning that one :oldrazz:

And also Wild Wild West.:csad:

[Brian Braddock]

Yeah, but don't hold that against him.

;)

[[A]]

never heard of that one
It's a Woody Allen movie (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120533/)--not so good..

[Anubis]

Does anybody think that, if this Thor film does include the Donal Blake story, they may change that up a bit? For example, instead of making him a medical student, how about an actual doctor?

I ask because, if that were to be a particular change, I can see Branagh playing Blake.


Well, Blake was already a respected doctor when he found out he was sharing space with Thor in the comics, so it seems like they have chosen to change it to Med student for this movie...which I suppose is so they can get a younger actor.

[Still A ThorFan]

best news for this movie so far...sure Branaugh has had some misses...but this is a guy who's created legitimate cinematic classics.

See Henry V or Hamlet and tell me Branagh is a poor choice.


Every director has had a bad film. Lets just hope he knows what he is doing.

[Still A ThorFan]

I say good choice for a director for Thor. I like Branagh. Henry V is an excellent movie! I really hope this turns out good. I hope they stick pretty closely to Mark Protosevich's first draft. I thought it was very good.


Me too, but there was too much time spent on earth hanging out with the vikings. I'd like more Asgard scenerios and more Loki.

[Chewy]

Thor's got a new release date, too.

Paramount Pictures and Marvel announced today they had reached an agreement under which Paramount will distribute Marvel's next five self-produced feature films on a worldwide basis. The films include the following complete with release dates and the like:

Iron Man 2 (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/movie/iron_man_2) (May 7, 2010)
Thor (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/movie/thor) (July 16, 2010)
The First Avenger: Captain America (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/movie/first_avenger_captain_america) (May 6, 2011)
The Avengers (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/movie/avengers) (July 15, 2011)
Iron Man 3 (TBA)

The news comes on the heels of today's earlier mention (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/kenneth_branagh_in_talks_to_direct_thor_20080929/) that Kenneth Branagh may in fact be directing Thor now that Matthew Vaughn is officially off the project.SOURCE (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/iron_man_2_thor_and_more_as_marvel_and_paramount_r each_an_agreement_20080929)

I think we all know the reason for the move :hoboj:

[hippie_hunter]

Wow.

Would never in a million years have connected Branagh to Thor. The more I think about it, the more I like it.
That's what I'm liking about this decision.

One things for sure, Branagh would certainly give a Thor movie epic grandeur. Imagine seeing his name on the posters? It's like a seal of class. You just know the acting will be top notch as Branagh doesnt suffer any >acting< fools.

The only reservation that I might have is that I wonder how much of an actual Thor fan is Branagh? If he isnt a fan, Will he take away a lot of the 'comic-booky' elements of Thor that we all know and love?
The Thor script seems to be more along the lines of Fraction's recent Thor one-shots and Stan Lee and Jack Kirby's Tales of Asgard. Based on the comic book character, but more along the lines of the actual Norse mythology. With that element in mind, Branagh is a great choice for this movie.

Also with that element in mind, a lot of the comic-booky elements such as Donald Blake and whatnot just have no place in this movie.

And on a side note, with that element in mind, this is how Thor should look:

http://www.immortalthor.net/news-agesofthunder1.jpg

[[A]]

http://www.immortalthor.net/news-agesofthunder1.jpg
great image :up: :up:

[DocHoliday]

Yeah that cover kicks all kinds of ass.

[The Chibi Kiriyama]

From what I can tell:

Thor might look like he traditionally does for the huge third act, but it's unclear. He does get "de-Thor'd" in many ways during the second act. The only major changes I noted was that there are runes etched all over Mjolnir that take the place of the traditional English writing on the side.

Loki has the comic book costume for the last part.

[[A]]

ehm.. I wanna read that, ahem

[DocHoliday]

ehm.. I wanna read that, ahem

As do I.

[Chewy]

If The Chibi Kiriyama has the same version of the script I have (which I assume he does, since I don't know of any others that are out there), it's what I would assume is a very old draft. It's dated 04/04/07.

[FaT_tONle]

Thor's got a new release date, too.

SOURCE (http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/iron_man_2_thor_and_more_as_marvel_and_paramount_r each_an_agreement_20080929)

I think we all know the reason for the move :hoboj:

So I guess Marvel is expecting TDK numbers now? But this move makes sense because no other studios grabbed a 2010 release date for another comicbook/superhero film. It has more to do with that than anything else... and it looks like Marvel took the same date as Narnia 3 with IM2... all I can say is sorry Disney... time to move... :cwink:

[The Chibi Kiriyama]

Umm..."very old"? For one, it's the only known draft that exists. But here's a better question: how's a script that was written last year "old"? The Creature from the Black Lagoon remake's script is older, and they're in the process of making it anyways. :huh:

[Chewy]

Not *very old* as in written ages ago, *very old* as in chances are good that a lot of it has changed significantly.

[The Chibi Kiriyama]

Oh, I don't doubt some things will have to be cut, unless they want to take a gamble with this. But I don't see where this requires a rewrite to any portion, or any extensions to what's already there.

[KenshinAtrain]

how did u guys come across a script?

[KangConquers]

I did some things I'll never forget...that'll haunt me till the end of my days...:csad:

Jk...friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend is Mark P.

[KenshinAtrain]

Mark P?

[tamron]

Mark P?
Mark Protosevich, the writer of the Thor script.

[KenshinAtrain]

ahh okay thanx havent really beeb following the move yet....still kinda outta the loop.

[co2]

Kenneth Branagh confirmed? That's great news! he's a great director who will no doubt bring the intelligence and sensibilities required to pull off Thor.
Finally we get some good news. been waiting for something for a while.

[terry78]

I always keep forgetting, as do the rest of us, that Branagh is not only an actor, but a director as well, and a damn good one. Sure, he can come off silly and goofy in some roles, but dead serious in others and behind the camera.

[Figs]

Never been a huge Thor fan but I would love to see what Branagh could do with this.

[KangConquers]

Never been a huge Thor fan but I would love to see what Branagh could do with this.

I ****ing love your avatar.

That's all.

[The Major]

From what I can tell:

Thor might look like he traditionally does for the huge third act, but it's unclear. He does get "de-Thor'd" in many ways during the second act. The only major changes I noted was that there are runes etched all over Mjolnir that take the place of the traditional English writing on the side.

Loki has the comic book costume for the last part.

In what ways was Thor de-Thored in the second act?

Sounds great.

[KangConquers]

In what ways was Thor de-Thored in the second act?

Sounds great.

He accidentally kills a well loved citizen of Asgard when he first gets his hands on Mjolnir. Odin punishes him.

[broblacksteel]

I cant believe how many people feel Dr. Blake has no place in the thor movie...what do u expect...for Blake to appear in pt. 2? the avengers? or how about we put blake as a cameo in IM2 then NOT let him appear in THOR? wow, fanboys get so stuck on info (the old script from a yr ago) and seemingly CANT open up to the fact that Dr. Blake is part of thor's punishment to earth as a result of being banished from asgard. Get over it, BLAKE is the main reason for the rewrite due to he wasn't in the original script...ALSO having earth settings will save on the budget as well. (an all asgard movie is a total setup for failure due to it being too expensive $150 mill or more, plus it does NOTHING to set up thor to become part of the avengers...). BTW this director will kick ass with the dialouge scenes, this is right up his alley...

[spider-neil]

it wouldn't bother me at all if the majority of this movie was set in asgard.

[KenshinAtrain]

i would hope for a healthy balance between the two TBH

[The Man of Steel]

sounds awesome :up: i hope he gets it

[CaptainCanada]

I cant believe how many people feel Dr. Blake has no place in the thor movie...what do u expect...for Blake to appear in pt. 2? the avengers? or how about we put blake as a cameo in IM2 then NOT let him appear in THOR? wow, fanboys get so stuck on info (the old script from a yr ago) and seemingly CANT open up to the fact that Dr. Blake is part of thor's punishment to earth as a result of being banished from asgard. Get over it, BLAKE is the main reason for the rewrite due to he wasn't in the original script...
The script is being rewritten because it cost too much.

[Canis Sapiens]

I cant believe how many people feel Dr. Blake has no place in the thor movie...what do u expect...for Blake to appear in pt. 2? the avengers? or how about we put blake as a cameo in IM2 then NOT let him appear in THOR? wow, fanboys get so stuck on info (the old script from a yr ago) and seemingly CANT open up to the fact that Dr. Blake is part of thor's punishment to earth as a result of being banished from asgard. Get over it, BLAKE is the main reason for the rewrite due to he wasn't in the original script...ALSO having earth settings will save on the budget as well. (an all asgard movie is a total setup for failure due to it being too expensive $150 mill or more, plus it does NOTHING to set up thor to become part of the avengers...). BTW this director will kick ass with the dialouge scenes, this is right up his alley...

Maybe this part of an interview with Mark Protosevich will help you:

"It's going to be like a super hero origin story, but not one about a human gaining super powers, but of a god realizing his true potential. It's the story of a Old Testament god who becomes a new Testament god."


http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=101019

Yep. Right from the horse's mouth. Keep in mind that Thor's origin occurred thousands of years before Don Blake.

I know that many of you would love if Blake could appear in the movie, but, having read the first draft, it would not feel organic. He isn't needed. In fact, I think that the Don Blake thing, since the beginning in the comics, was just a writer's trick to adjust Thor to the superhero formula, giving him a weakness and a secret identity. It wasn't needed in the 60s comics, let alone in a movie that happens in Asgard, thousands of years ago...

And there's more (beware of spoilers):

Thor becomes human in the second act, a human in VIKING times, learning his humility lesson, so if Blake showed up later, it would be kind of redundant

Again, all of this is so integral to the story that any rewrite to include Blake would feel too artificial and change the very soul of the movie. Other sites have read a newer draft and said that there's no sign of Blake as well. I think the whole secret identity angle would just confuse the general public, they wouldn't know if Thor and Blake are the same person, separate entities, if Blake was Thor without memories, if they share the same body... too much trouble, IMO.

As for the cameo in Iron Man 2, this is pure speculation based on a Kevin Feige early interview (right after IM opening weekend) in which he said that THOR (not Blake) could appear in IM2. Later, Jon Favreau took time to deny that this Thor cameo would happen (he never denied the Nick Fury cameo, as comparison).

[Rust]

Sounds perfect to me. Let's first learn who THOR is and where he comes from. Then if there are sequels or if The Avengers happen introduce him there.
The first THOR-movie should deal with only THOR and should be set in Asgard and Midgard. No retarded contemporary world setting.

[Canis Sapiens]

Sounds perfect to me. Let's first learn who THOR is and where he comes from. Then if there are sequels or if The Avengers happen introduce him there.
The first THOR-movie should deal with only THOR and should be set in Asgard and Midgard. No retarded contemporary world setting.

I wholeheartedly agree!!!:up:

Showing Thor in Asgard, with all those epic fights and mythological creatures, and then bringing him to 21st century New York would turn the film into an involuntary comedy.

[Rust]

I fear it could unfortunately. No seriously, I dont think it would be very smart to include Blake so early, if at all. Being a dane myself and loving my mythology, I never cared for the Blake-character in the first place and introducing him in the first film would be a confusing mess and just plain silly.
I also think it would remind me too much of that stupid parallel-world stunt they pulled in that Masters of the Universe-movie from the 80's.

[marcvader]

How about a "Highlander" type of treatment where he comes to Earth during the Viking era in human form and by the time Avengers comes around he's already been on Earth for a few hundred years and has taken up the Donald Blake persona in modern times

[spider-neil]

show thor in his own world first with all the grandeur and majesty that comes with asgard. trolls, dragons, giants the works. show that thor is different from every other marvel superhero in that he was BORN a superhero.

if blake 'must' turn up in this movie I would want it saved for the very last scene. i.e. hundreds of years after thor's exploits in asgard cut to blake in a cave with walking stick, whacks walking stick turns into thor, roll credits.

[Marz69]

How about a "Highlander" type of treatment where he comes to Earth during the Viking era in human form and by the time Avengers comes around he's already been on Earth for a few hundred years and has taken up the Donald Blake persona in modern times
This would work for me since I loved Highlander. But I love the humility aspect as it's a compelling part of his persona. Whether it be Blake or some other name is fine, but as long as this seemingly mortal part of him exists. Then he could live in modern times and be available in a believable way to work with the avengers.

As per the spoiler:
Thor becomes human in the second act, a human in VIKING times, learning his humility lesson, so if Blake showed up later, it would be kind of redundant This would be the Blake character. I really want the alter ego but it doesn't have to be Dr Blake, it could be whomever (a viking) as long as The God is made mortal and the lesson is learned. And having it hapen in the 2nd act is perfect because that means a chunk of time is devoted to his growth.

[marcvader]

He could have whatever name or some danish equivalent of Donald or Blake and just uses Donald Blake in our times to fit in.

[chamber-music]

How about a "Highlander" type of treatment where he comes to Earth during the Viking era in human form and by the time Avengers comes around he's already been on Earth for a few hundred years and has taken up the Donald Blake persona in modern times

I too like this idea.

[Brian Braddock]

How about a "Highlander" type of treatment where he comes to Earth during the Viking era in human form and by the time Avengers comes around he's already been on Earth for a few hundred years

show thor in his own world first with all the grandeur and majesty that comes with asgard. trolls, dragons, giants the works.



Y'see - ^^^these two posts have just encapsulated why I'm excited about what we could see in this movie.

Highlander with Trolls, Dragons, Giants.

Imagine it - LOTR meets Superman.

The visual scope and potential of the Thor that we're gonna finally see up there on the big screen is truly, truly mouth-watering.

[chamber-music]

Giants are cool. There aren't enough movie giants. Branagh needs to make stuff happen!

[KangConquers]

Well at the end of the script

Thor is refered to as protector of Earth.


So I see his character evolving over 1,000 years to a God long forgotten by men, but still doing his duty. Having observed men's changes over the years, he'd be able to adapt, and develop the Donald Blake personality as a cover.

It'd be cool if Donald Blake was the latest in a series of secret identities so that he could keep a watch on humanity.

[Brian Braddock]

Chamber, Just imagine........................

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/ymir.gif

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/ymir_trabbold.jpg

[R_Hythlodeus]

Chamber, Just imagine........................

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/ymir.gif

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/ymir_trabbold.jpg
Transformer movie goes high fantasy? eurgh..:csad:

[Anubis]

You wanna know what the importance of Thor having a human side is, read "Death of Odin" through the "Reigning" of Thor's book. It's the same way Superman needs Clark Kent. To keep him grounded. It's the whole reason he sent him to Earth in the first place. I would however not bother with the 60 second rule. That has always blown.

[[A]]

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/ymir.gif

That's the HULK's father !!

[Ronny Shade]

I'm very excited about this Kenneth Branagh news. I just wanted everyone to know that.

[KangConquers]

I'm very excited about this Kenneth Branagh news. I just wanted everyone to know that.

duly noted.

[L0ngsh0t]

I think this is ultra intriguing-I'm not as sold as I was one Faverau for Iron Man, he was just perfect from the beginning but I think Kenneth could easily give us the Epic sized scope needed for this flick. I'm pumped

[Ronny Shade]

I'm way more sure about Branagh than I was about Faverau. He'll be very passionate about the project. And that's the best ingredient for a great film.

[nite-owl]

But he's been in other movies, not onky Shakespeare material--like Gingerbread Man, The Proposition or The Theory of Flight. He's gonna be in Valkyrie too.

Kenneth Branagh wasn't in The Proposition.

[[A]]

Kenneth Branagh wasn't in The Proposition.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120108/

owned.

[chamber-music]

Kenneth Branagh wasn't in The Proposition.

He was in a UK movie called The proposition not the Australian one with Guy Pearce and Ray Winestone.

[nite-owl]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120108/

owned.

:csad: My mistake I was thinking of the other Proposition the one Chamber-Music mentioned.

[[A]]

:csad: My mistake
it's ok :oldrazz:

[Sarg92]

I don't read comics so I don't know much about the characters such as Thor but I think Favreau was saying in Avengers it would be difficult to have Thor fit into the modern world cos in his own movie it is set in Asgard.

Now I was thinking it could be pretty simple, I mean you could have Loki as the main villian in Avengers and Odin orders Thor to go to Earth and stop Loki, now when he gets to Earth the first thing he see's is Hulk smashing stuff up, creating havoc with Iron Man and Captain America attempting to stop him. Thor could think that Hulk is some ogre, troll, goblin, whatever that Loki has brought with him to Earth and then Thor helps to take down Hulk in which they learn that Hulk is not a villian and wants to be left alone etc... then you have the fight and such with Loki etc...

[Anubis]

You fit him in the same way they fit him in in the comics. Sent to Earth by his pops as a crippled doctor to learn how to stop being such a douche bag.

[Still A ThorFan]

I don't read comics so I don't know much about the characters such as Thor but I think Favreau was saying in Avengers it would be difficult to have Thor fit into the modern world cos in his own movie it is set in Asgard.

Now I was thinking it could be pretty simple, I mean you could have Loki as the main villian in Avengers and Odin orders Thor to go to Earth and stop Loki, now when he gets to Earth the first thing he see's is Hulk smashing stuff up, creating havoc with Iron Man and Captain America attempting to stop him. Thor could think that Hulk is some ogre, troll, goblin, whatever that Loki has brought with him to Earth and then Thor helps to take down Hulk in which they learn that Hulk is not a villian and wants to be left alone etc... then you have the fight and such with Loki etc...

Well done. And can you imagine Thor and Hulk beating the hell out of each other on a big screen!? Of course Thor should get the upperhand.

And no Donald Blake. I don't want ER meets Superman.

[Ronny Shade]

I think Donald Blake is a good idea. Good role for Branagh to play. :D

[Sawyer]

I think Donald Blake is a good idea. Good role for Branagh to play. :D

Branagh is Loki.

[Chewy]

I'd rather see Branagh as Balder or Heimdall.

[hippie_hunter]

I cant believe how many people feel Dr. Blake has no place in the thor movie...what do u expect...for Blake to appear in pt. 2? the avengers? or how about we put blake as a cameo in IM2 then NOT let him appear in THOR? wow, fanboys get so stuck on info (the old script from a yr ago) and seemingly CANT open up to the fact that Dr. Blake is part of thor's punishment to earth as a result of being banished from asgard. Get over it, BLAKE is the main reason for the rewrite due to he wasn't in the original script...ALSO having earth settings will save on the budget as well. (an all asgard movie is a total setup for failure due to it being too expensive $150 mill or more, plus it does NOTHING to set up thor to become part of the avengers...). BTW this director will kick ass with the dialouge scenes, this is right up his alley...

With the success of Iron Man, I'd bet that Marvel is willing to spend a bit more money on the project to get it done right. Blake can easily be set up for a sequel.

And honestly, Marvel needs to push the Avengers back so that we can have sequels to Thor and the Incredible Hulk dammit :cmad:

[[A]]

So.. tell me.. are we all happy about these Branagh news..? Looks that way.

[Bubastis]

Woah.
Cool..

[[A]]

And honestly, Marvel needs to push the Avengers back so that we can have sequels to Thor and the Incredible Hulk dammit :cmad:
Yeah, I wish!

[Chris Wallace]

So.. tell me.. are we all happy about these Branagh news..? Looks that way.
Overall, I'd say yes.

[chiefchirpa]

With the success of Iron Man, I'd bet that Marvel is willing to spend a bit more money on the project to get it done right. Blake can easily be set up for a sequel.

And honestly, Marvel needs to push the Avengers back so that we can have sequels to Thor and the Incredible Hulk dammit :cmad:

Thor has to proof the execs that it's a winner. Hulk needs more deliberations for the sequel, because it's nearly unprofitable.

I think Marvel is also jumping the gun with IM 3, for IM 2 can very well be a dud. But as long as they don't make the definite date, it's still ok.

[The Major]

And no Donald Blake. I don't want ER meets Superman.

It can work. Read JMS Thor run.

Blake being a doctor doesn't have to overwhelm the movie just like Peter Parker a being a photographer doesn't interfere that much with Spider-man's movies.

[The Chibi Kiriyama]

There isn't a good reason why we can't have a Thor sequel. If anything, this movie's gonna need a bridge to the Avengers extravaganza, and there's no reason with Protosevich's script to think that this won't make the cash for one.

[broblacksteel]

here's a question...IF/WHEN thor is successful.... he defeats loki, redeems himself by becoming the thunder god at the end of the movie, if blake is in it and gets the girl, odin is pleased, thor fights a huge frost giant, trolls, warriors/barbarians etc....tell me this....WHERE DO U GO FROM HERE WITH PART 2? (the wrecking crew? loki returns?)

I hope once the avengers get going marvel doesn't loose track of the solo properties (cap 2, thor 2, im3, ant-man) and concentrates more on avengers 2....since it will make like a billion dollars.... agree??

[hippie_hunter]

Thor has to proof the execs that it's a winner. Hulk needs more deliberations for the sequel, because it's nearly unprofitable.
The Incredible Hulk had a production budget of $150 million. It's worldwide box office was about $255.5 million.

Now before someone brings up the argument of most studios don't get most of the money in foreign box office, take into account that Universal itself or United International Pictures (which is a joint venture between Universal and Paramount) handled distribution for the Incredible Hulk in the largest markets in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Russia, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Argentina, Norway, South Korea, Poland, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, Taiwan, South Africa, Italy, Greece, Singapore, Germany so out of that $250 million, Universal/Marvel ended up getting about $200 million of it. That alone disqualifies the Incredible Hulk in unprofitable territory.

But lets not forget that Universal did sell distribution rights of the film to companies such as Sony in Spain and Japan, Paramount in France, Australia, and New Zealand, and other distributors in countries of Eastern Europe, China, India, etc.

Or all the licensing such as the Incredible Hulk toys by Hasbro, the Incredible Hulk video game by Sega, the Incredible Hulk book by Del Ray, and various other products such as clothing, calendars, lunchboxes, etc.

And to top it all off, the DVD and blu-ray

I think Marvel is also jumping the gun with IM 3, for IM 2 can very well be a dud. But as long as they don't make the definite date, it's still ok.
With the reception Iron Man got, it's pretty much a certainty that Iron Man 2 will not be a dud.

[FaT_tONle]

With the reception Iron Man got, it's pretty much a certainty that Iron Man 2 will not be a dud.

Marvel is a young studio and they are rushing things... too much of a good thing too fast is never a good thing. How do you come out on day four following IM's release and announce a slate as ambitious as this based on the opening weekend numbers? It's irresponsible, that's all there is too it. I get greenlighting IM2 although it was still way too early. They could have even announced Thor while they are at it... but bookmarking Captain America and for icing on the cake... announcing Avengers three days after Iron Man's release is just acting on a 100% drunk head. Marvel made promises that they potentially can not keep. If Thor and Cap underperform what then? Where is all this appeal that Avengers was supposed to have? I really hope Thor turns out to be gold. He has the potential. Marvel needs to get this right to get some respect so that people can start treating Marvel films seriously again. One franchise... as big as Iron Man is... will not be enough to carry an Avengers film and it certainly won't be enough to carry Marvel long term.

[Marz69]

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/thor20ages20of20thunder_preview.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/SUPERBENITEZ/3077new_storyimage7244584_full.jpg


I liked the pics. Just thought I’d bump it. :cwink:
You fit him in the same way they fit him in in the comics. Sent to Earth by his pops as a crippled doctor to learn how to stop being such a douche bag.
:funny: I don't care in which world he learns his lesson. As long as he does. I want Thor to be compelling. And I want it to be played by the same actor.
Well done. And can you imagine Thor and Hulk beating the hell out of each other on a big screen!? Of course Thor should get the upperhand.
:wow: I really hope we get a Thor-Hulk battle. Thay would be amazing.
And honestly, Marvel needs to push the Avengers back so that we can have sequels to Thor and the Incredible Hulk dammit
I hear ya. The avengers sounds really cool and all, but I’m more into Thor. As for the avengers, thor meeting Hulk should be made epic.

Does anyone know if Norton has signed on to do Banner in avengers.

[Chris Wallace]

I don't think anything's been finalized where Norton is concerned.

[The Chibi Kiriyama]

He's not committed. It's one of the negatives to his contract. He has no obligation to do an Avengers movie or another Hulk film, however unlikely the latter is.

[The Major]

here's a question...IF/WHEN thor is successful.... he defeats loki, redeems himself by becoming the thunder god at the end of the movie, if blake is in it and gets the girl, odin is pleased, thor fights a huge frost giant, trolls, warriors/barbarians etc....tell me this....WHERE DO U GO FROM HERE WITH PART 2? (the wrecking crew? loki returns?)

Thor's got a great rogues gallery.

There's the Destroyer, Hela, Enchantress, Surtur and numerous others.

The Wrecking Crew and Absorbing Man could even be interesting to see in movies depending how they're executed.

I hope once the avengers get going marvel doesn't loose track of the solo properties (cap 2, thor 2, im3, ant-man)
We'll probably get an Avengers trilogy, with the most popular franchises getting a movie or two between them, if its a success.

and concentrates more on avengers 2

I'd assume they want the Avengers movies sequels being done quickly so they keep the actors in as many movies as possible.

....since it will make like a billion dollars.... agree??

It might. It might not. Who knows with these things.

[Vartha]

JMS has nothing but good things to say about the man
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2008/09/30/thor-comic-writer-j-michael-straczynski-says-kenneth-branagh-perfect-for-thor-film/

[chamber-music]

The Incredible Hulk had a production budget of $150 million. It's worldwide box office was about $255.5 million.

Now before someone brings up the argument of most studios don't get most of the money in foreign box office, take into account that Universal itself or United International Pictures (which is a joint venture between Universal and Paramount) handled distribution for the Incredible Hulk in the largest markets in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Russia, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Argentina, Norway, South Korea, Poland, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, Taiwan, South Africa, Italy, Greece, Singapore, Germany so out of that $250 million, Universal/Marvel ended up getting about $200 million of it. That alone disqualifies the Incredible Hulk in unprofitable territory.

But lets not forget that Universal did sell distribution rights of the film to companies such as Sony in Spain and Japan, Paramount in France, Australia, and New Zealand, and other distributors in countries of Eastern Europe, China, India, etc.

Or all the licensing such as the Incredible Hulk toys by Hasbro, the Incredible Hulk video game by Sega, the Incredible Hulk book by Del Ray, and various other products such as clothing, calendars, lunchboxes, etc.

And to top it all off, the DVD and blu-ray


Yep :applaud

There are movies that get sequels off of strong DVD sales alone.

[chiefchirpa]

You mean like the Punisher?

Different budget bracket.

[Sarg92]

He's not committed. It's one of the negatives to his contract. He has no obligation to do an Avengers movie or another Hulk film, however unlikely the latter is.

I hear lots of people say that but there has been no article or report or quote to my knowledge that says Norton isn't contracted for other films. I know most of the cast is signed for three films like Roth,Hurt,Tyler,Burrel and Blake-Nelson and that Leterrier only was signed for one film (TIH) like most directors are but there hasn't been much word on Norton.

Now I know that when he made rewrites to Penn's script that he set out everything for a TIH franchise, three films. He intended TIH to be chapter 1 of the story and he didn't really make big changes because he couldn't cos of the time he was signed onto the project.

Now I am sure Norton would come back for TIH2 sequels or Avengers if he has control, if he can do what he wants (which is normally for the best). Norton is very smart and talented and it would be a blow if Marvel lose him.

Norton said in his last interview that he isn't sure what is happening to TIH or Avengers as he hasn't heard anything about it. The way he said it was that Marvel get all these characters together but don't really know what to do. They are rushing things. I mean they announced a 4 year slate right after Iron Man's opening weekend. They have no idea if they will be able to meet those dates. Even Favreau says IM2 will be a struggle to release on time. Marvel should have waited and took their time.

[Brian Braddock]

The thing that worries me about the Norton situation >if he isnt signed for to return< is the stories of the bad blood between himself and Marvel resulting from the theatrical cut of TIH.

Norton doesnt seem the type to suffer fools gladly or to be the forgiving type.

[FaT_tONle]

I have already accepted that Ed Norton will walk. His return would be a complete bonus... icing on the cake. As long as RDJ and the rest of the "trio" return along with Sam Jackson and other characters previously featured we'll be straight. I am not gonna get worked up with another Banner recast. You can find an equally capable actor in the role. Norton will demand too much control and the movie will struggle IMO do the the clashing egos between the studio/director/actors.

[Chewy]

If Norton doesn't come back they could just write him out. It'd be pretty easy to involve Hulk without involving Banner.

[Brian Braddock]

I guess it's the presige thing of it all though.

As comicbook fans, we want to be able to point to one of our movies and say to our sceptical friends 'Look at the A-list talent that they've got in this movie.

Norton's name alongside RDJ on the poster just fits.

[Sarg92]

Yep, they could just have Hulk in Avengers with no Banner but it would be a shame without Norton.

And the whole Norton vs Marvel thing was blown out of proportion by the media. Norton understood Marvel's decision for a shorter more action driven cut as he knew it would be a better business decision but as a filmmaker, Norton wanted a longer cut with more character scenes. That is all. Norton, Leterrier and some Marvel execs were talking about it, discussing it like and someone walked in saw what was happening, didn't understand it and knew Norton had a reputation on past films and made an big story outta it when it was just people discussing ideas like they do on all films.

[chamber-music]

They should just get Eric Bana back as Banner if Norton doesn't return.

Nortons on his way to getting the bad kind of reputation the likes of Mickey Rourke and Val Kilmer had. Doesn't matter how good an actor you are no director is gonna wanna work with someone if they are really difficult.

[Spider-Fan]

They should just get Eric Bana back as Banner if Norton doesn't return.

Nortons on his way to getting the bad kind of reputation the likes of Mickey Rourke and Val Kilmer had. Doesn't matter how good an actor you are no director is gonna wanna work with someone if they are really difficult.

Bad idea. This would only confuse people.

The reason Hulk would have been in Avengers in the first place was to be the Avengers' first fight as a team. Nothing more, imo. Losing the Hulk just means one less cool fight. I'd like Norton to come back, but if he doesn't, oh well. I liked TIH, a sequel to it is unlikely anyway, and we lose a cool fight. Not the worst thing they could lose.

[KenshinAtrain]

I am completly against Eric Bana as the Norton. My reasoning for this is IMO one of the draws for the Hulk for was seeing this somewhat frail scraggly guy turn into this giant hulking monster. To me it just loses some of its effect seeing a big guy turned into and even bigger guy

[Chewy]

They kind of have to bring Hulk back after the RDJ scene, imo. That could either be as a star with Norton returning or as a glorified cameo in the form of a fight as just the CG Hulk.

[chamber-music]

Well if they recast Banner it will only confuse people more anyway. They should just let Norton release his cut on DVD to shut him up. That should keep him happy

[Spider-Fan]

They kind of have to bring Hulk back after the RDJ scene, imo. That could either be as a star with Norton returning or as a glorified cameo in the form of a fight as just the CG Hulk.

Just having a CG Hulk is not a bad idea, but people will want to see Banner in that case.

Well if they recast Banner it will only confuse people more anyway. They should just let Norton release his cut on DVD to shut him up. That should keep him happy

Using a new actor is not as confusing as using an actor from a movie that no longer counts. That's like Bale leaving after TDK and them casting Michael Keaton again. Confusing.

[Marz69]

Just having a CG Hulk is not a bad idea, but people will want to see Banner in that case.
And to get him angry Thor could just hit Banner over the head with a hammer. :woot:
I am completly against Eric Bana as the Norton. My reasoning for this is IMO one of the draws for the Hulk for was seeing this somewhat frail scraggly guy turn into this giant hulking monster. To me it just loses some of its effect seeing a big guy turned into and even bigger guy
:funny: Norton did make a good Banner. I just don't want to go backward with Bana. It will be a mess. :huh: Find a way to get him back or just use Hulk or recast (last possible option)

[Ronny Shade]

With the success of Iron Man, I'd bet that Marvel is willing to spend a bit more money on the project to get it done right. Blake can easily be set up for a sequel.

And honestly, Marvel needs to push the Avengers back so that we can have sequels to Thor and the Incredible Hulk dammit :cmad:
I'd agree with you if Incredible Hulk didn't suck so hard

[Project862006]

what are you talking about lol incredible hulk was really good way better than ang lee's version imo hulk don't need a sequel i fee lit will be the same him smashing next foe what else could they do

[FaT_tONle]

He is an Ang Lee lover... don't mind Ronny (more power too him though). Marvel will be pressed to get big names for Cap and Thor if they don't bring back Norton... then it will just be RDJ and Sam Jackson... and maybe a recognizable name for the villain and that's all... that's no where near an Ocean's Eleven type cast... other comic book films have had a better cast than that (assuming they go with relative unknowns for the rest of the heroes... not likely but possible). As a poster mentioned before... there is something about seeing RDJ and Norton together on that first teaser poster to really make this Avenger thing blow up in peoples faces... in a good way :cwink:.

[Ronny Shade]

I'm sure they could get a pretty popular actor as Cap. Especially if he's going to be the central character.

[Still A ThorFan]

Ok, enough. this is THOR THREAD back to topic.

[broblacksteel]

The more i think about it the more i like the idea of having the hulk in the avengers, due to i want to see thor and the hulk have an epic battle (even if amounts to less than 2minutes screen time). If the hulk gets knocked out or subdued, he can transform back to banner curled up (we DONT have to see the face...so any anctor shaped liked norton will due).

I'm really curious about the thor rewrite....

[REDophile]

Hmmm.....I'm very intrigued as to what Branagh will do with Thor. He might as well have some on-screen cameo sort of like Favreau did in IM.

[Ronny Shade]

The more i think about it the more i like the idea of having the hulk in the avengers, due to i want to see thor and the hulk have an epic battle (even if amounts to less than 2minutes screen time). If the hulk gets knocked out or subdued, he can transform back to banner curled up (we DONT have to see the face...so any anctor shaped liked norton will due).

I'm really curious about the thor rewrite....
Hulk is a very boring character if you don't include Banner. I'd rather a recast.