PDA

View Full Version : 'H2', Rob Zombie's sequel to 'Halloween'


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

The Apatow Crew
08-06-2009, 06:16 PM
Yeah, I find that interesting as well. I mean, if they mean Michael films, then, tbh, I think that's bad thinking by them.I don't know, it's just possible internet talk.

bullets
08-06-2009, 06:45 PM
Hmm, a Halloween 3 remake possible? I doubt it, but Rob isn't saying no...
http://www.horrorbid.com/blog/blog1.php/2009/08/02/rob-zombie-talks-halloween-3-remake


i'm for another halloween movie but please don't let it be season of the witch.

Majik1387
08-06-2009, 06:56 PM
What if they incorporated Season of the Witch with Michael Myers? :eek:



:oldrazz:

bullets
08-06-2009, 07:26 PM
What if they incorporated Season of the Witch with Michael Myers? :eek:



:oldrazz:


they could make it a viral video and post it on fail blog

Spider-ManHero12
08-06-2009, 07:34 PM
i'm for another halloween movie but please don't let it be season of the witch. Why? IMO, as a stand alone film, Season of The Witch was great.

Nightmare
08-06-2009, 07:39 PM
Season of the Witch is epic.

Johnny Drama
08-06-2009, 08:13 PM
Season Of The Witch sucked :o

Nivek
08-06-2009, 08:18 PM
Looking back, it would have been interesting to imagine a yearly Halloween "Concept" that didn't have to rely on the Michael Myers character. Like Trick 'R Treat, 30 years earlier.

Johnny Drama
08-06-2009, 08:23 PM
It would have been cool, but they ruined any chance of that working when they included Michael in Halloween 2.

Nightmare
08-06-2009, 08:27 PM
Season Of The Witch sucked :o

Blasphemy! Movie was great. Just cause it doesnt have MM in it, fan boys get pissy and it automatically sucks. :whatever:

Majik1387
08-06-2009, 08:29 PM
I found Season of the Witch watchable and semi-entertaining, though I hated the ending.

Johnny Drama
08-06-2009, 08:30 PM
Blasphemy! Movie was great. Just cause it doesnt have MM in it, fan boys get pissy and it automatically sucks. :whatever:

Read my above post, it has nothing to do with Myers, I actually agree with Nivek that the series would have been very interesting if it was a different, stand alone film released each year around Halloween.

The movie sucked because it was slow and boring :whatever:

Spider-ManHero12
08-06-2009, 08:31 PM
Season of the Witch is epic. Indeed. Scary as hell, too.

Nivek
08-06-2009, 08:38 PM
I have the Silver Shamrock song as my ringtone last Halloween.

Nightmare
08-06-2009, 08:52 PM
Read my above post, it has nothing to do with Myers, I actually agree with Nivek that the series would have been very interesting if it was a different, stand alone film released each year around Halloween.

The movie sucked because it was slow and boring :whatever:

We can agree to disagree. Perhaps Halloween: Resurrection is more your taste.

Nightmare
08-06-2009, 08:52 PM
I have the Silver Shamrock song as my ringtone last Halloween.

That is simply bad ass.

The Apatow Crew
08-06-2009, 09:11 PM
Season of the Witch is epic.Epically bad maybe. They should have just called it Season of the witch and leave Halloween of the title.

Given i've only seen this once and it was on AMC at like 2 in the morning.

Nivek
08-06-2009, 09:19 PM
It was a nice Halloween theme, and it was done by Carpenter and Hill, shouldn't it be gold?

The Apatow Crew
08-06-2009, 09:21 PM
Once you hear the theme song from Halloween 3 it gets in your head and won't get out.

Spider-ManHero12
08-06-2009, 09:26 PM
Once you hear the theme song from Halloween 3 it gets in your head and won't get out. Oh, hell yes. :up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjZTYT0QQmY&feature=related

Nivek
08-06-2009, 09:28 PM
I know, that's why I just play that synth intro and it get's to people...

Celtic Warlock's, Virgin Sacrifice, an chunk of Stonehenge, and Android killers.

Miles away from your typical slasher flick of the time. I remember how p.o.ed my Aunts were back in the early 80's after they seen it, and realized they really killed off Michael. and it was another 8 years before you seen Michael Myers in another Halloween flick.

The Apatow Crew
08-06-2009, 09:37 PM
I just guess sometimes you can't mess with a franchise of a main character and try to add something else in instead. People get mad over this.

I mean I'm not saying ideas like this are bad. Just don't trick people by calling it a Halloween film. when you say a Halloween film people automatically think of Micheal Myers, not the one about masks with Tom Atkins.

The Original Bamfer
08-06-2009, 09:39 PM
I just guess sometimes you can't mess with a franchise of a main character and try to add something else in instead. People get mad over this.

I mean I'm not saying ideas like this are bad. Just don't trick people by calling it a Halloween film. when you say a Halloween film people automatically think of Micheal Myers, not the one about masks with Tom Atkins.

But that was exactly what Carpenter had originally planned - a series of films featuring different stories and characters that related to Halloween.

Nivek
08-06-2009, 09:40 PM
It wasn't a Halloween Film but a magic robot mass virgin sacrifice for Samhain flick. No stabby stabby. But you got to see little Dick Warlock not sporting his mask.

Nivek
08-06-2009, 09:41 PM
But that was exactly what Carpenter had originally planned - a series of films featuring different stories and characters that related to Halloween.

And the crowds at that time turned on it.

The Apatow Crew
08-06-2009, 09:43 PM
And the crowds at that time turned on it.It's like they got used to Micheal Myers and didn't wanna see something like that.

How do you think something like that would go over today?

The Original Bamfer
08-06-2009, 09:44 PM
And the crowds at that time turned on it.

I don't deny that, I'm just explaining that that was where the creator of the series wanted to take it. It's not like he 'trick[ed] people by calling it a Halloween film' because that was what he had planned on doing with the Halloween franchise from the beginning.

Johnny Drama
08-06-2009, 09:50 PM
We can agree to disagree. Perhaps Halloween: Resurrection is more your taste.

Halloween 1-2, 4 and H20. The rest I could care less about.

Nivek
08-07-2009, 05:34 AM
I don't deny that, I'm just explaining that that was where the creator of the series wanted to take it. It's not like he 'trick[ed] people by calling it a Halloween film' because that was what he had planned on doing with the Halloween franchise from the beginning.

Hey, I'm agreeing with you, just pointing out that crowds were what sunk the idea of Halloween being an Anthology of holiday horror stories than just another Slasher flick. People keep wondering why Carpenter never returned, and that's pretty much it.

TwilightPro101
08-07-2009, 07:48 PM
As a stand alone horror film, I have no issue with SEASON OF THE WITCH. I thought it was fairly well done and an effective horror film dealing with the Halloween season.

Is it a Michael Myers movie? No, but I can't blame John Carpenter for approaching the Halloween franchise with a different approach every year. But alas the franchise has become that of Michael's.

Overall, my favorites are 1,2, 6, and H20.

Nightmare
08-07-2009, 08:17 PM
Was their a new trailer out? Looked like a new one attached to A Perfect Getaway, i just caught it as i walked in the theatre. Looked like new scenes to me, but i havent been following every tv spot.

The Apatow Crew
08-07-2009, 09:21 PM
Huh, thats interesting. I was thinking of seeing a perfect get away. I'll habve to take notice to it then if i do.

Spider-ManHero12
08-07-2009, 09:31 PM
Was their a new trailer out? Looked like a new one attached to A Perfect Getaway, i just caught it as i walked in the theatre. Looked like new scenes to me, but i havent been following every tv spot. Hmm, it could be. Watch the trailer again to see if it refreshes your memory.

The Apatow Crew
08-07-2009, 09:32 PM
As a stand alone horror film, I have no issue with SEASON OF THE WITCH. I thought it was fairly well done and an effective horror film dealing with the Halloween season.

Is it a Michael Myers movie? No, but I can't blame John Carpenter for approaching the Halloween franchise with a different approach every year. But alas the franchise has become that of Michael's.

Overall, my favorites are 1,2, 6, and H20.Yeah, you could say its a all right movie if it wasn't called Halloween 3. And just called Season Of the Witch.

TwilightPro101
08-09-2009, 02:17 AM
As much as I like Michael Myers being attached strictly to Halloween, I would have loved to have seen what the individual Halloween films would have been like had Carpenter and co. been allowed to continue as such and I've always had a bit of a soft spot for the idea, that Carpenter's idea of bringing Michael Myers back ala ghost style. Even if Akkard and co. weren't fans of it.

Nightmare
08-09-2009, 02:22 AM
Do you know the reason why Carpenter didnt continue what he had planned after halloween 3?

The Joker
08-09-2009, 08:03 AM
Do you know the reason why Carpenter didnt continue what he had planned after halloween 3?

Because H3 bombed at the box office. People were not interested in a Halloween movie without Michael Myers. So the studio wanted to bring Michael back.

Carpenter wasn't interested. Carpenter didn't even want to do a HII with Michael in it. He wrote HII with Michael and Loomis being killed at the end in the fire. That was supposed to be the end.

When he heard they were bringing them back for H4, he washed his hands of the series, and sold the rights to the studio.

Doctor Jones
08-09-2009, 09:15 AM
Truthfully, I like to think H20 was the end of the Carpenter series. Their thing in Ressurection with the switch was stupid and shoe horned in. The chopping off the head with him holding his hand out to his sister was a nice touch to end it. But noooo they had to continue it. Laurie dying my ass.

Spider-ManHero12
08-09-2009, 11:56 AM
Truthfully, I like to think H20 was the end of the Carpenter series. I have to agree there. :up:

Nightmare
08-09-2009, 12:05 PM
Truthfully, I like to think H20 was the end of the Carpenter series. Their thing in Ressurection with the switch was stupid and shoe horned in. The chopping off the head with him holding his hand out to his sister was a nice touch to end it. But noooo they had to continue it. Laurie dying my ass.


heh, yeah that was pretty bad.

Nivek
08-09-2009, 01:27 PM
Truthfully, I like to think H20 was the end of the Carpenter series.

No, Halloween 2 was John last word in the Michael Myers series. H20 was Jamie Lee wanting her own personal Swan Song.

The Joker
08-09-2009, 04:31 PM
No, Halloween 2 was John last word in the Michael Myers series. H20 was Jamie Lee wanting her own personal Swan Song.

John Carpenter has huge respect for H20. In fact it's the ONLY Halloween movie, aside from the original, that he has any respect for.

I love H20. H1, HII, and H20 are the perfect Halloween story. Michael vs Laurie.

Johnny Drama
08-09-2009, 04:36 PM
John Carpenter has huge respect for H20. In fact it's the ONLY Halloween movie, aside from the original, that he has any respect for.

I love H20. H1, HII, and H20 are the perfect Halloween story. Michael vs Laurie.

What? John Carpentar is a hack. He shouldn't be alowed to make moves. Now Rob Zombie that is some talent there! He took that LAME-O Michael Myers and made him EXTREME!!! Wheres a DEW? 'Cuz I wanna chug one!!

Fanticon
08-09-2009, 04:40 PM
man the more i see of h2 the less excited i get...i really think rz may be taking his vision a little too far in h2. i loved what he did with the first movie but now i'm not convinced....from the previews alone i mean.

The Apatow Crew
08-09-2009, 04:41 PM
What do you mean too far?

Fanticon
08-09-2009, 04:56 PM
michael not wearing his mask, the visions of his mom...i realize a remake of the original halloween II would be a little dull to some people...so i understand rz has to make it his own, but right now...teasers alone...i'm not gettin anything out of it.

hitmanyr2k
08-09-2009, 05:17 PM
John Carpenter has huge respect for H20. In fact it's the ONLY Halloween movie, aside from the original, that he has any respect for.

I love H20. H1, HII, and H20 are the perfect Halloween story. Michael vs Laurie.

H20 was a Dawson's Creek episode guest-starring Michael Myers. The only decent thing about that movie was the first 10 minutes, the opening credits, and the last 10 minutes. Everything in between was pretty much bleh. I consider H4 more of a Halloween sequel than H20.

Nivek
08-09-2009, 07:37 PM
John Carpenter has huge respect for H20. In fact it's the ONLY Halloween movie, aside from the original, that he has any respect for.

Is he quoted anywhere saying that, just to verify?

Sawyer
08-09-2009, 07:39 PM
Halloween 1-2, 4 and H20. The rest I could care less about.

Agreed. The first two were classics, the third I dont even count as a Halloween movie, the fourth was a great follow up, the fifth was okay but had alot of ****tiness to it, the sixth was weird as hell, H20 was pretty good and Resurrection was garbage. And I liked RZH.

The Joker
08-09-2009, 09:42 PM
H20 was a Dawson's Creek episode guest-starring Michael Myers.

Are you actually labelling it that just because Michelle Williams was in it? LOL! I suppose Batman Begins was the same because Katie Holmes was the leading lady :whatever:

I consider H4 more of a Halloween sequel than H20.

I don't. H4 went and created a new Myers relative, and went the cliche route of dressing the child up in Michael's old clown costume which he wore when he killed his sister. And *GASP* they made the little Myers niece do the same thing at the end.

H20 continued the Michael vs Laurie storyline, which is the heart of the Halloween franchise. The only element it was missing was Loomis. And it would have been a crime to recast the late Donald Pleasance.

Pleasance was criminally underused in H4, too. He wasn't even there for the final showdown with Michael.

Is he quoted anywhere saying that, just to verify?

Yep, he and the late Debra Hill are on the special features of the H20 DVD. Both of them discuss it.

It's on YouTube somewhere, no doubt.

Johnny Drama
08-09-2009, 09:49 PM
Yep, he and the late Debra Hill are on the special features of the H20 DVD. Both of them discuss it.


Yeah, I remember that. Carpentars co-sign gave it that much more validity.

Spider-ManHero12
08-09-2009, 10:15 PM
Originally Posted by Joker http://forums.superherohype.com/images/Drakon/SHHClassic/smallbuttons/viewpost.gif (http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?p=17308158#post17308158)
Yep, he and the late Debra Hill are on the special features of the H20 DVD. Both of them discuss it.
Interesting. I'll have to check out the special features if I can get my hand on the DVD. :up:

hitmanyr2k
08-09-2009, 10:23 PM
Are you actually labelling it that just because Michelle Williams was in it? LOL! I suppose Batman Begins was the same because Katie Holmes was the leading lady :whatever:

Not only because it had Michelle Williams in it but because it had Kevin Williamson's "Dawson's Creek" and "Scream" signature all over that movie. Hell, they even used the freakin Scream score in the film. If Kevin Williamson wrote Batman Begins I'm sure it would have had the same teenybopper vibe H20 had.

I don't. H4 went and created a new Myers relative, and went the cliche route of dressing the child up in Michael's old clown costume which he wore when he killed his sister. And *GASP* they made the little Myers niece do the same thing at the end.

And it was all executed a hell of a lot better than H20.

H20 continued the Michael vs Laurie storyline, which is the heart of the Halloween franchise. The only element it was missing was Loomis. And it would have been a crime to recast the late Donald Pleasance.

H20 continued the Michael vs. Laurie storyline and went with the same trendy horror formula that Scream and I Know What You did Last Summer made popular at the time (all of which Kevin Williamson also wrote). Felt nothing like a Halloween movie. They simply cashed in on Jamie Lee Curtis being back.

Pleasance was criminally underused in H4, too. He wasn't even there for the final showdown with Michael.

Pleasance was used just about the same length in H1 and H2. In fact I would say he got more screentime in H4 than he did in H1 or H2.

The Joker
08-10-2009, 09:19 AM
Not only because it had Michelle Williams in it but because it had Kevin Williamson's "Dawson's Creek" and "Scream" signature all over that movie. Hell, they even used the freakin Scream score in the film. If Kevin Williamson wrote Batman Begins I'm sure it would have had the same teenybopper vibe H20 had.

Hilarious. That is your reasoning? The star of the movie is a mature woman, Laurie Strode, dealing with her demons. It's her story. She has the bulk of the screen time, and you say it has a teenybopper vibe?

ROFL!

And it was all executed a hell of a lot better than H20.

Disagree. H20 is leaps and bounds ahead of it.

H20 continued the Michael vs. Laurie storyline and went with the same trendy horror formula that Scream and I Know What You did Last Summer made popular at the time (all of which Kevin Williamson also wrote).

In what way? What was done with the Michael vs Laurie story that was taken exclusively from those movies?

I'm dying to hear this.

Pleasance was used just about the same length in H1 and H2. In fact I would say he got more screentime in H4 than he did in H1 or H2.

Actually you're wrong. Pleasance had more screen time in H2, than any of the movies.

But you're measuring it by quantity, not quality. When I say Loomis was underused, I mean the character was like a side element. He goes to Haddonfield, warns them again, then vanishes altogether when Michael does strike, reappears again briefly, and gets tossed thru a window, and then is absent until the very end after Michael is beaten. Crap.

Not to mention the character was written like an idiot. He sees a bunch of teenagers going around town dressed as Michael Myers, and then he tells a bunch of trigger happy rednecks that Michael is loose in their town. Also loved the brilliant plan to lock themselves up in a house in a town with no phone or power, instead of hopping into a car and getting out of town to safety to call help.

LOL!

Nivek
08-10-2009, 01:07 PM
I really don't understand the love for H20 some of you have. But I do agree with Hitman in regards to the Scream/ IKWYDLS similarities (of course Kevin Williamson writing it, no kidding). It annoyed me when I first seen it that the tone was closer to those films than a Halloween film.

Johnny Drama
08-10-2009, 01:29 PM
I really don't understand the love for H20 some of you have. But I do agree with Hitman in regards to the Scream/ IKWYDLS similarities (of course Kevin Williamson writing it, no kidding). It annoyed me when I first seen it that the tone was closer to those films than a Halloween film.

The tone in H20 was much closure to the tone of a Halloween film than 2007's Halloween was.
The "Scream" similarities do Halloween more justice than "The Devils Rejects" atmosphere set up by Zombie.

Spider-ManHero12
08-10-2009, 01:57 PM
I really don't understand the love for H20 some of you have. Well, I mean, it's a really good and faithful sequel, which should have been the last film of the original franchise.

Balthus Dire
08-10-2009, 02:29 PM
Are we really still talking about which versions are "better"?

Marx
08-10-2009, 03:06 PM
Are we really still talking about which versions are "better"?

It's the default argument around here. :cwink:

Nightmare
08-10-2009, 04:07 PM
We all know Halloween: Resurrection was the best. Whats the argument? :cwink:

Majik1387
08-10-2009, 04:13 PM
I really don't understand the love for H20 some of you have. But I do agree with Hitman in regards to the Scream/ IKWYDLS similarities (of course Kevin Williamson writing it, no kidding). It annoyed me when I first seen it that the tone was closer to those films than a Halloween film.
I don't understand some of the hate that the Thorn cult gets...

The Apatow Crew
08-10-2009, 04:19 PM
Fourth 'Halloween II' TV Spot Takes a Jab at 'The Final Destination'?

A fourth TV Spot was released today for Rob Zombie's Halloween II (http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/film/1612) entitled "Final Destiny", which appears to be a jab at New Line Cinema's The Final Destination. The two films are set to go head-to-head on August 28th, but I think if I were a betting man I'd say Death is going to win. I guess we'll find out in a few weeks? You can check out the new TV Spot from Michael Myers return to Haddonfield beyond the break.
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/17028

So who's gonna win the box office for that weekend? Death or Micheal Myers?

Spider-ManHero12
08-10-2009, 04:20 PM
Here's the TV spot. :up:

http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=11365

SsM
08-10-2009, 04:22 PM
Fourth 'Halloween II' TV Spot Takes a Jab at 'The Final Destination'?


http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/17028

So who's gonna win the box office for that weekend? Death or Micheal Myers?


I think FD will win.

Motown Marvel
08-10-2009, 04:24 PM
that fourth tv spot is awesome.

The Apatow Crew
08-10-2009, 04:27 PM
I think FD will win.I kinda think that also. I mean since younger kids like FD more prolly then MM. But i'm sure it'll be close.

SsM
08-10-2009, 04:30 PM
I kinda think that also. I mean since younger kids like FD more prolly then MM. But i'm sure it'll be close.


It's also got the 3D gimmick.

Nightmare
08-10-2009, 04:33 PM
Id be suprised if FD 3D wins, RZ's remake did pretty well at the box office. Not to mention the 3 films before have been absolute rubbish.

The Apatow Crew
08-10-2009, 04:54 PM
Id be suprised if FD 3D wins, RZ's remake did pretty well at the box office. Not to mention the 3 films before have been absolute rubbish.
Don't count out the FD films. They've all mad a pretty good profit. With the last one making 30 million opening weekend. So like I said it'll be close. Prolly with FD making about 25-32 million maybe and RZ H2 about 24-30.

JustABill
08-11-2009, 12:24 PM
FD3 lost a ton of money if I recall correctly. It failed to perform better than FD2. The only gimmick this one has is 3-D and how many times can one watch a movie in 3-D before it gets old?

Top that with their literally being nobodiesi n the cast and the deaths looking absolutely over the top stupid this time and I think FD might be in for an upset.

Marx
08-11-2009, 12:29 PM
We all know Halloween: Resurrection was the best. Whats the argument? :cwink:

Those are fightin' words! :cmad:

:oldrazz:

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 07:26 PM
Zombie's Halloween (http://forums.superherohype.com/#) II As Strong As Rejects?

As the song http://kona.kontera.com/javascript/lib/imgs/grey_loader.gif
(http://forums.superherohype.com/#) goes, Rob Zombie is "never gonna stop." Since Comic-Con, the multi-hyphenate has been racing through the final lap of post-production on Halloween II (http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/films.php?id=8895). The sequel to 2007's Halloween (http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/films.php?id=447) has tested both in New York and Los Angeles and is jetting towards its August 28 release.

"It's a reality-based film but there's more trippy stuff at the end," Zombie tells ShockTillYouDrop.com, responding to this writer's comment about the sequel going beyond the usual slasher fare. The writer-director is feeling incredibly positive about his sophomore outing with Michael Myers. "Most of the people that worked on this movie (http://forums.superherohype.com/#) worked on The Devil's Rejects. And I think we all feel this movie is the logical follow. That Halloween itself was a weird left turn that never found its groove. Halloween II is to Halloween as Rejects is to House of 1000 Corpses. We shot the last film on 35mm, it was cleaner. This one, we went back to shoot a dirty, nasty movie on 16mm."

August 28 doesn't mean Zombie takes a hiatus. There's a new album (http://forums.superherohype.com/#) on the way, currently untitled. "I think it's going to come out at the end of October or the beginning of November. We have a tour starting in October. The plan is to go on tour for a while then finally come back and make Tyrannosaurus Rex. Because that got shoved off to the side and that was a film I really wanted to make. It's like Rejects on steroids."

Tyrannosaurus Rex (http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/films.php?id=4678) was in development at Dimension through 2008 and is said to be a mix of Raging Bull and The Road Warrior.
http://www.shocktilyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=11395

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 07:58 PM
Those are fightin' words! :cmad:

:oldrazz: :hehe:

Nivek
08-12-2009, 09:13 PM
I really think the H2 promotions is picking up. a commercial was just on SciFi Channel.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 09:28 PM
I've seen an equal amount of spots for H2 as I have for TFD.

Johnny Drama
08-12-2009, 09:38 PM
Id be suprised if FD 3D wins, RZ's remake did pretty well at the box office. Not to mention the 3 films before have been absolute rubbish.

FD3 made more money than RZH, and had half the marketing. [/andknowingishalfthebattle]

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 09:44 PM
FD3 made more money than RZH, and had half the marketing. [/andknowingishalfthebattle]RZ's Halloween made close to 59 domestically and made a total of about 80 million worldwide.

While FD3 made about 54 domestically, but made 113 worldwide.

So it appears FD3 did better overseas then RZ's Halloween.

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 09:47 PM
I've seen an equal amount of spots for H2 as I have for TFD. I've actually seen more H2 Tv spots than I have TFD.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 09:50 PM
I've actually seen more H2 Tv spots than I have TFD.I think it all depends on what channel you're watching. But both films are going for the same age group the 18-35 crowds, maybe even younger.

Johnny Drama
08-12-2009, 09:52 PM
RZ's Halloween made close to 59 domestically and made a total of about 80 million worldwide.

While FD3 made about 54 domestically, but made 113 worldwide.

So it appears FD3 did better overseas then RZ's Halloween.

Worldwide is what counts. Especially when it's 113 over 80 :oldrazz:

Johnny Drama
08-12-2009, 09:54 PM
I've actually seen more H2 Tv spots than I have TFD.

Yeah, I have hardly seen any TFD spots. I am hoping that H2 is the winner, because obviously I want to see the series progress.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 09:54 PM
Worldwide is what counts. Especially when it's 113 over 80 :oldrazz:I always thought it was domestically that counted better.

Cause look at Speed Racer it flopped in the states, but over seas it did good, but still its called a bomb. Cause its what matters over here really, cause most of the movies are made by American movie companies.:word:

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 09:56 PM
Yeah, I have hardly seen any TFD spots. I am hoping that H2 is the winner, because obviously I want to see the series progress.If it does continue, which i'm sure it will. RZ won't be directing. But then again thats what most said last time.

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 10:05 PM
Yeah, I have hardly seen any TFD spots. I am hoping that H2 is the winner, because obviously I want to see the series progress. I second that. Michael has always been my favorite slasher, and I don't want to see him go.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 10:08 PM
I second that. Michael has always been my favorite slasher, and I don't want to see him go.I don't think if he leaves that he'll leave forever, but just go on a bit of a vacation of you will. Like he did Between Halloween 2 and Halloween 3.:yay:

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 10:10 PM
I don't think if he leaves that he'll leave forever, but just go on a bit of a vacation of you will. Like he did Between Halloween 2 and Halloween 3.:yay: Yeah, true. Or they might do what they did with Jason. Part 4 was supposed to be the last. Hell, it was called "The Final Chapter". It whent on for a ALOOOT longer than that, lol. :yay::woot:

Pittman4Two
08-12-2009, 10:12 PM
This looks really bad.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 10:21 PM
Yeah, true. Or they might do what they did with Jason. Part 4 was supposed to be the last. Hell, it was called "The Final Chapter". It whent on for a ALOOOT longer than that, lol. :yay::woot:Yes, but atleast they were semi-true to their words. Cause Jason wasn't in part 5. It was a fake jason who was really a ambulance driver of the kid who got hacked to death of a stupid candy bar.:oldrazz:

san15
08-12-2009, 10:33 PM
I wonder how long the produces can keep the franchise going, because new fans discovering the Holloween movies for the first time will get confused with the older ones.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 10:37 PM
I wonder how long the produces can keep the franchise going, because new fans discovering the Holloween movies for the first time will get confused with the older ones.I don't what there is to be confused about. Seeing as RZ's starts from the start of the Halloween series and the last one in th old series Resurrection has a full grown Micheal.

Plus different people in the roles should tell people.

SsM
08-12-2009, 10:40 PM
I wonder how long the produces can keep the franchise going, because new fans discovering the Holloween movies for the first time will get confused with the older ones.


It's a slasher franchise with little to no continuity... what is there to be confused about?

Johnny Drama
08-12-2009, 10:41 PM
I always thought it was domestically that counted better.

Cause look at Speed Racer it flopped in the states, but over seas it did good, but still its called a bomb. Cause its what matters over here really, cause most of the movies are made by American movie companies.:word:

How does that make sense? By the end of the day, FD3 made 113 million, while Halloween made 80 million.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 10:49 PM
How does that make sense? By the end of the day, FD3 made 113 million, while Halloween made 80 million.That cool deaths scenes just appeal more to kids then Micheal Myers does.

Death and Jigsaw are the new Freddy's, Jason's and Micheal's of this time now.

But all of those characters are slowing getting re introduced by remakes to the younger crowds who like the FD and Saw films.

Marx
08-12-2009, 10:53 PM
That cool deaths scenes just appeal more to kids then Micheal Myers does.

Death and Jigsaw are the new Freddy's, Jason's and Micheal's of this time now.

But all of those characters are slowing getting re introduced by remakes to the younger crowds who like the FD and Saw films.

That's just depressing...

Nightmare
08-12-2009, 10:54 PM
This looks really bad.

Nice breakdown. Cant wait for your review "It Sucked".

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 10:56 PM
That's just depressing...And before those two it was the fisherman and ghostface in the 90's

Every decade is gonna have a new icon for that certain time.

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 10:58 PM
Yes, but atleast they were semi-true to their words. Cause Jason wasn't in part 5. It was a fake jason who was really a ambulance driver of the kid who got hacked to death of a stupid candy bar.:oldrazz: Yeah, lol, but still. It's considered a Jason film either way, lol. :woot:

Marx
08-12-2009, 10:58 PM
And before those two it was the fisherman and ghostface in the 90's

Every decade is gonna have a new icon for that certain time.

That's true.

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 10:59 PM
That's just depressing... Couldn't have said it better. :up:

Every October when a new Saw film comes out, all I hear in my high school is "YOu see the new Saw? It was cool." I roll my eyes.

SsM
08-12-2009, 11:00 PM
I like the saw movies. I could go for a little less gore and a little more story though.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:02 PM
That's true.I think its just great Icons from the 70's and 80's are still around yet 25-30 years later.

And I'm sure more will be remembered then others. Because look at Leatherface he doesn't get mentioned as much as Freddy,Jason or Micheal and yet he was around way longer before any of them.
Yeah, lol, but still. It's considered a Jason film either way, lol. :woot:And yet that films is always referred to as the film thats not Jason. Or the one with the Fake Jason.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:04 PM
I like the saw movies. I could go for a little less gore and a little more story though.I think in some of them they have as much equal story as gore.

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 11:08 PM
And yet that films is always referred to as the film thats not Jason. Or the one with the Fake Jason. Yeah, you're right about that.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:14 PM
Yeah, you're right about that.Just like how Halloween 3 is referred to as the one without Micheil Myers.

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 11:15 PM
YOu know, I try to avoid some horror films these days. As I've said, I hate Hostel and Saw for many reasons. I mean, I sometimes wonder how people think it can compare to this, but to each his own I, guess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rKlI42nSE

Spider-ManHero12
08-12-2009, 11:17 PM
Just like how Halloween 3 is referred to as the one without Micheil Myers. I agree with you 90 %. The other 10% is disagreement, honestly. Now, it is ture that that is similar in ALOT of ways, but the thing is, in the 80's, I don't think people knew spoilers about endings of films, and such. I mean, I really think people thought that was really Jason in part 5, and not that ambulance driver, you know? While everybody knew Halloween III was not a Michael Myers film.

Marx
08-12-2009, 11:32 PM
Couldn't have said it better. :up:

Every October when a new Saw film comes out, all I hear in my high school is "YOu see the new Saw? It was cool." I roll my eyes.

I like the saw movies. I could go for a little less gore and a little more story though.

I think in some of them they have as much equal story as gore.

I remember seeing Saw and Saw II in theaters. (I may have seen Saw III in theaters as well.) I just remember that I felt physically sick at the last one I saw in theaters. Needless to say, my interest feel off afterward.

Marx
08-12-2009, 11:33 PM
I think its just great Icons from the 70's and 80's are still around yet 25-30 years later.

And I'm sure more will be remembered then others. Because look at Leatherface he doesn't get mentioned as much as Freddy,Jason or Micheal and yet he was around way longer before any of them.
And yet that films is always referred to as the film thats not Jason. Or the one with the Fake Jason.

I think that speaks volumes that they have been able to sustain themselves throughout nearly 30 years.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:36 PM
I don't think I've ever gone so far to say I felt physically sick.

But I just guess some people have the stomach for them and others don't.

It's just like some can ride roller coasters and others can't without getting sick. I am not one of people who can ride one really.

GothamAlleys
08-12-2009, 11:37 PM
Its obvious now what his real priorities are and that hes as much of a greedy BSer as any Hollywood exec. I was kind of hyped up for the Halloween remake so I was watching all his promo interviews and appearances, and his line throughout was that the remake was done cause the movie had so many sequels and sequels are just unnecessary appendages that add too much mess and stuff to the story. Thats why he came to clean it all up. And thats why you see Mike and the doc dying in his remake. well, the remake made $ and look what Robbie's doin now...

_____________
The # 1 James Cameron fansite online - www.JamesCameronOnline.com

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:38 PM
I think that speaks volumes that they have been able to sustain themselves throughout nearly 30 years.Thats [rp;;y cause of all the sequels they had. Cause I don't think they would be still around much if it wasn't for all the sequels, As stupid of a thing as that sounds.

Marx
08-12-2009, 11:40 PM
I don't think I've ever gone so far to say I felt physically sick.

But I just guess some people have the stomach for them and others don't.

It's just like some can ride roller coasters and others can't without getting sick. I am not one of people who can ride one really.

I don't normally mind the blood, guts, and gore...but Saw (whichever one it was) was just too much. I can't even remember what scene it was that made me feel that way...I think i've blocked it out! :funny:

SsM
08-12-2009, 11:40 PM
Thats [rp;;y cause of all the sequels they had. Cause I don't think they would be still around much if it wasn't for all the sequels, As stupid of a thing as that sounds.


Say WHA??!!:wow:

I hate it when that happens.

Marx
08-12-2009, 11:41 PM
Thats [rp;;y cause of all the sequels they had. Cause I don't think they would be still around much if it wasn't for all the sequels, As stupid of a thing as that sounds.

I know what you mean but cult classics never die man. The originals would still carry through.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:42 PM
Say WHA??!!:wow:

I hate it when that happens.I don't know either.

I'm just tired thats all. almost 1am where i am. I'm just like huh when i read whet i posted.

Sawyer
08-12-2009, 11:49 PM
I remember seeing Saw and Saw II in theaters. (I may have seen Saw III in theaters as well.) I just remember that I felt physically sick at the last one I saw in theaters. Needless to say, my interest feel off afterward.

I'm not even going to lie, I cant do super-gory movies like that in theatre. On DVD, I'm a little bit more okay with it, but in a theatre theres no way of avoiding it. You're just stuck for two hours.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:51 PM
I'm not even going to lie, I cant do super-gory movies like that in theatre. On DVD, I'm a little bit more okay with it, but in a theatre theres no way of avoiding it. You're just stuck for two hours.Its not even 2 hours its like 90 mins if that.

I've seen Saw 4 and 5 in theaters. I've also seen the Collector in theaters.

Marx
08-12-2009, 11:53 PM
I'm not even going to lie, I cant do super-gory movies like that in theatre. On DVD, I'm a little bit more okay with it, but in a theatre theres no way of avoiding it. You're just stuck for two hours.

I can understand that. In the theaters, you can't escape from it. At home, there are more distractions.

The Apatow Crew
08-12-2009, 11:56 PM
I can understand that. In the theaters, you can't escape from it. At home, there are more distractions.Just place your hands over your eyes.:o

Marx
08-13-2009, 12:00 AM
Just place your hands over your eyes.:o

...and then there's the wonderful Dolby Digital surround sound of crunching bones in some kind of 'gears of doom'. It's like I said earlier, blood, guts, and gore don't normally bother me, but whatever part in Saw that was just didn't sit well.

Sawyer
08-13-2009, 12:01 AM
Just place your hands over your eyes.:o

Thats for women. :cmad::oldrazz:

I want to see it... just not on a 30 foot tall screen with surround sound. I'd just prefer to see it at home.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 12:31 AM
Thats for women. :cmad::oldrazz:

I want to see it... just not on a 30 foot tall screen with surround sound. I'd just prefer to see it at home.So you feel even more dirty then huh? Like you're watching something you shouldn't on a small screen tv eating baked beans out of a can cold.

Sawyer
08-13-2009, 12:33 AM
So you feel even more dirty then huh? Like you're watching something you shouldn't on a small screen tv eating baked beans out of a can cold.

Indeed. :up:

CelticPredator
08-13-2009, 12:36 AM
Marx, I think you were saw the cinematic abomination known as Saw 3. One of the worst movies ever made in my opinion. I cant remember when I was so mad at everyone in a movie. The entire cast was made up of ****tards. The gore was pointless, and disgusting.

Saw is the worst series of all time. There is no point, there is no fun, it is horrid. Yes, I WILL use the term TORTURE PORN.

But Saw...that is a good flick. It uses gore when it needs to, and is an effective thriller.

CelticPredator
08-13-2009, 12:37 AM
...and then there's the wonderful Dolby Digital surround sound of crunching bones in some kind of 'gears of doom'. It's like I said earlier, blood, guts, and gore don't normally bother me, but whatever part in Saw that was just didn't sit well.

And I know what scene you mean too. Its from Saw 3, the Rack Trap...or something. I did feel sick. It wasnt fun to watch at all.....

Marx
08-13-2009, 12:41 AM
And I know what scene you mean too. Its from Saw 3, the Rack Trap...or something. I did feel sick. It wasnt fun to watch at all.....

Yeah, I think that might have been it. After thinking about it, I'm pretty sure that Saw III was the last one I've seen in theaters. I haven't seen IV, V, or however many more there are.

CelticPredator
08-13-2009, 12:47 AM
I Saw 4 (hehe), and I dug it. But it wasnt that good. It had less gore, and had a better style to it....

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 12:11 PM
I remember seeing Saw and Saw II in theaters. (I may have seen Saw III in theaters as well.) I just remember that I felt physically sick at the last one I saw in theaters. Needless to say, my interest feel off afterward. Really? The gore doesn't bother me, I do think the gore in the Saw films are a bit much, but hey, that's all they are about. No good story at all and not scary.

Balthus Dire
08-13-2009, 12:25 PM
Which is a damn shame because the first two had great stories.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 12:33 PM
Which is a damn shame because the first two had great stories. I have to disagree. Over time, I realised how much I really don't like Saw at all. I guess I'm very picky with what I like with horror. I like Slashers, monsters, zombies, and vampires. I'm not crazy about how hollywood has made vmapire films...seem....sexual. Speaking of vampires, Fright Night still kicks ass.

SsM
08-13-2009, 12:36 PM
I have to disagree. Over time, I realised how much I really don't like Saw at all. I guess I'm very picky with what I like with horror. I like Slashers, monsters, zombies, and vampires. I'm not crazy about how hollywood has made vmapire films...seem....sexual. Speaking of vampires, Fright Night still kicks ass.


Vampires have ALWAYS been sexual.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 12:36 PM
Its funny how this thread goes in out and from talking about H2 to always going back to talking about the Saw films.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 12:54 PM
Vampires have ALWAYS been sexual. Some films push it to a different level though.

Marx
08-13-2009, 01:00 PM
Its funny how this thread goes in out and from talking about H2 to always going back to talking about the Saw films.

It's kinda like an unofficial 'Horror Lounge' in here. :funny:

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 01:03 PM
It's kinda like an unofficial 'Horror Lounge' in here. :funny:
Yeah, but then again thats what all horror threads are like here when no news in that certain thread is to be out and someone mentions something and it just goes from there.

Marx
08-13-2009, 01:06 PM
Yeah, but then again thats what all horror threads are like here when no news in that certain thread is to be out and someone mentions something and it just goes from there.

That's true.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:08 PM
I have a question, what do you guys think is next for Myers? I mean, I've asked that before, but it's jsut to hard to think.

Marx
08-13-2009, 01:12 PM
...a brief hiatus.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:14 PM
^^ I expect it to be a while, tbh. Let's hope not.

Balthus Dire
08-13-2009, 01:16 PM
Its funny how this thread goes in out and from talking about H2 to always going back to talking about the Saw films.

I'd rather talk about the Saw films than argue over which version of Halloween is "better". :o

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 01:16 PM
...a brief hiatus.Thats what I was saying.


And I wouldn't be surprised down the line of Platinum Dunes eventually gets the rights.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:18 PM
Thats what I was saying.


And I wouldn't be surprised down the line of Platinum Dunes eventually gets the rights. Yeah, that'd be cool. Still, though, for some reason, I think we're going to get a Season Of The Witch remake before we get another Halloween. I'm realy curious how that film would work in present day.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 01:22 PM
Yeah, that'd be cool. Still, though, for some reason, I think we're going to get a Season Of The Witch remake before we get another Halloween. I'm realy curious how that film would work in present day.Thats if that rumor was true or not.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:24 PM
Thats if that rumor was true or not. Yeah, true, but still, I think it'll happen.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 01:26 PM
Yeah, true, but still, I think it'll happen.There is actually a movie coming out called Season of the witch. But its not a Halloween film. Nic Cage is in it.

BLACK-SPIDEY
08-13-2009, 01:27 PM
I'd rather talk about the Saw films than argue over which version of Halloween is "better". :o

yeah and tbh i only liked the first film it was just great, i also liked the next 2 sequels but after the 4th one i lost all the interest on the franchise.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:28 PM
There is actually a movie coming out called Season of the witch. But its not a Halloween film. Nic Cage is in it. Yeah, I heard about. Obviously, though, if we get a ream of Halloween III, it won't be called Halloween III. I guess it'll just be called Season Of The Witch.

SsM
08-13-2009, 01:29 PM
Yeah, I heard about. Obviously, though, if we get a ream of Halloween III, it won't be called Halloween III. I guess it'll just be called Season Of The Witch.


It can't be called season of the witch.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:31 PM
It can't be called season of the witch. Well, it has to be called something that is similar to the originals' name.

SsM
08-13-2009, 01:32 PM
Well, it has to be called something that is similar to the originals' name.


Not really, there are quite a few remakes that change the name.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 01:32 PM
Yeah, I heard about. Obviously, though, if we get a ream of Halloween III, it won't be called Halloween III. I guess it'll just be called Season Of The Witch.If they do something like that, they should just come up with a new name or just continue with MM. And then just call it Halloween and then a sub-title after it. Like they did with Halloween: Resurrection.

That way you don't have to call it halloween 3.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 01:34 PM
Not really, there are quite a few remakes that change the name.
Yeah, like how Sorority Row shorten its name. The full title of the original was The House on Sorority Row.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 01:40 PM
If they do something like that, they should just come up with a new name or just continue with MM. And then just call it Halloween and then a sub-title after it. Like they did with Halloween: Resurrection.

That way you don't have to call it halloween 3. Yeah, that could work.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 04:09 PM
Season of the Witch sucked. And are they just gonna reboot the franchise over in the future or just continue to make sequels like before?

SsM
08-13-2009, 04:41 PM
Season of the Witch sucked. And are they just gonna reboot the franchise over in the future or just continue to make sequels like before?


That's a silly question.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 05:31 PM
Season of the Witch sucked. And are they just gonna reboot the franchise over in the future or just continue to make sequels like before? It didn't suck, if you ask me. It's a good film on it's own, as I have said.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 07:25 PM
Movie sucked on its own.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:08 PM
A silly question.


Half of that page needs to be deleted now!

C. Lee
08-13-2009, 08:10 PM
Geez Loiuse.....here we go again.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:11 PM
Geez Loiuse.....here we go again.


That's what I'm sayin!

C. Lee
08-13-2009, 08:12 PM
And is trolling even a word?
Yes.....yes it is.
Whatever dude just stop replying back to me alright. You did not have to say anything in the first place jerk.

Stop the name calling.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:13 PM
I called him a jerk. Which he is one. I asked a question. All he had to do was ignore it or say something like we do not know.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:15 PM
I called him a jerk. Which he is one. I asked a question. All he had to do was ignore it or say something like we do not know.


If you knew me, you would know I'm probably the easiest person on this website to get along with. I really don't appreciate being called a jerk. I was only pointing out that none of us have ANY inside knowledge about what is going on in the franchise.

I wasn't being a jerk at all, I even initially said it was a silly question instead of a stupid question to spare you getting your feelings hurt.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:19 PM
Dude how you responded in that message you was acting like a jerk.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:20 PM
No, I wasn't. ._.

C. Lee
08-13-2009, 08:20 PM
I called him a jerk. Which he is one. I asked a question. All he had to do was ignore it or say something like we do not know.

And now you have an infraction. I originally deleted the post you called him a name and simply told you to stop it....but no, you had to go ahead and do it again in the above post. Keep this up and you won't be around for too much longer.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:22 PM
C Lee i did not even curse him out?

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:26 PM
And you deleted the page so you did not see him post like a mean person.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:27 PM
And you deleted the page so you did not see him post like a mean person.


I'll re post everything I said if you like.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:27 PM
No you change up what you say.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:28 PM
Thanks alot ssm now i'm the bad guy, cause you responded in a rude way.

C. Lee
08-13-2009, 08:28 PM
C Lee i did not even curse him out?
You do not have to use only curse words to flame someone or to get a warning or an infraction.
And you deleted the page so you did not see him post like a mean person.

When we the mods DELETE a post....WE can still see them, it's the regular posters who can't.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:29 PM
No you change up what you say.

No, I won't :


"That's a silly question"


"Why the **** would we know what is going to happen with a franchise?"

"Well when they asked people on an internet forum if they were making a third batman it was a stupid question then and asking if there is going to be another Halloween is also a stupid questions"

I may have missed a few words here and there.. but I think that sums it up.


"How old are you kid? Good God"


"Damn! Where are C. Lee and Marx when you need em?!"

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:31 PM
Well did you read it.

C. Lee
08-13-2009, 08:32 PM
He's not going to get it SsM....just ignore him.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:33 PM
:( Makes me sad panda.

Johnny Drama
08-13-2009, 08:33 PM
Well did you read it.

I don't like the cut of your jibb. :o

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:34 PM
Thanks alot ssm now i'm the bad guy, cause you responded in a rude way.


You're welcome, you're the only person here to ever call me a jerk. :csad:

Nivek
08-13-2009, 08:35 PM
Thorn. Didn't it seem cool for 10 seconds? Then part 6 was so many years later and screwed it all up. The Producers Cut was a bit better, but that wasn't the mess everyone seen in theaters...

Discuss...

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:35 PM
Lee I get it. Its whatever.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:36 PM
Thorn. Didn't it seem cool for 10 seconds? Then part 6 was so many years later and screwed it all up. The Producers Cut was a bit better, but that wasn't the mess everyone seen in theaters...

Discuss...


I wonder if I saw the producers cut.....

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:36 PM
SSM responds to me in a rude way and I get in trouble? Fine its cool.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:37 PM
I was not being rude!

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:38 PM
Sure cursing and everything in your posts is not being rude? It is. I said no curse words and I get in trouble. Okay its cool like I said. Carry on.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:39 PM
I don't like the cut of your jibb. :o

What did I do to you?

Gallagher
08-13-2009, 08:40 PM
And you deleted the page so you did not see him post like a mean person.

SsM, change your sig to this, now.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:40 PM
Sure cursing and everything in your posts is not being rude? It is. I said no curse words and I get in trouble. Okay its cool like I said. Carry on.


No, if you can read them in the right context, learn how to do that and come back in a few years. :)

I said one curse word.

Aesop Rocks
08-13-2009, 08:42 PM
This thread is great.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:42 PM
Thorn. Didn't it seem cool for 10 seconds? Then part 6 was so many years later and screwed it all up. The Producers Cut was a bit better, but that wasn't the mess everyone seen in theaters...

Discuss...


I think my reply got lost in all of the goof.

Do they have a dvd release of the Producers cut? I think I MAY have seen it..

Hunter Rider
08-13-2009, 08:43 PM
:brucebat:

Gallagher
08-13-2009, 08:44 PM
This thread is great.

I need to wander in here more often.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:45 PM
No, if you can read them in the right context, learn how to do that and come back in a few years. :)

I said one curse word.

Cursing is cursing. And you cursed. You replied in a rude way and thats the bottom line. You could of just simply said we do not know, something like that. But you got it man cause you seem to get away from this clean.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:45 PM
:brucebat:


It needs the MM mask!

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:45 PM
Cursing is cursing. And you cursed. You replied in a rude way and thats the bottom line. You could of just simply said we do not know, something like that. But you got it man cause you seem to get away from this clean.


I WAS NOT BEING RUDE. I even tried to spare your feelings!!!

You are blowing this completely out of proportion.

Gallagher
08-13-2009, 08:47 PM
Prince...

I am Dissapoint.

Hunter Rider
08-13-2009, 08:48 PM
Cursing is cursing. And you cursed. You replied in a rude way and thats the bottom line. You could of just simply said we do not know, something like that. But you got it man cause you seem to get away from this clean.

Drop it or Im'a have to call Uncle Phil!

http://i29.tinypic.com/2vsj4ue.jpg

C. Lee
08-13-2009, 08:49 PM
Cursing is cursing. And you cursed. You replied in a rude way and thats the bottom line. You could of just simply said we do not know, something like that. But you got it man cause you seem to get away from this clean.

Drop it now....get this thread back on track.

Fresh Prince
08-13-2009, 08:51 PM
Alright C Lee its over. Sorry for what happened. I will just go somewere now and post esle were.

SsM
08-13-2009, 08:52 PM
You guys scared Nivek away :(

Colossal Spoons
08-13-2009, 08:58 PM
Is this forum always like this? I hope so :D

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:00 PM
Are we all still fighting in here?:yay:

Kelly
08-13-2009, 09:01 PM
Fresh Prince, your infraction was not about the conversation before....it was about the fact that C.Lee asked you to stop the namecalling, and you continued. The only difference I would have made in the call would be to infract you for insubordination....C. Lee simply chose a different infraction.

Its an "infraction" a chance for you to live and learn....so learn, and you can continue to live here on the hype with us....:yay:

SsM
08-13-2009, 09:02 PM
Are we all still fighting in here?:yay:


I don't think so, I think Nivek's legit question got deleted though :(

Colossal Spoons
08-13-2009, 09:03 PM
On topic(:eek:)

I actually saw the trailer for this movie for the first time today. I've never seen a single Halloween movie, will I be lost as heck?

SsM
08-13-2009, 09:05 PM
On topic(:eek:)

I actually saw the trailer for this movie for the first time today. I've never seen a single Halloween movie, will I be lost as heck?


You need to watch RZ: Halloween, all of the others are in different continuities.

Sawyer
08-13-2009, 09:05 PM
On topic(:eek:)

I actually saw the trailer for this movie for the first time today. I've never seen a single Halloween movie, will I be lost as heck?

I dont think you'll be too lost... you may want to rent the first Rob Zombie Halloween.

Colossal Spoons
08-13-2009, 09:07 PM
You need to watch RZ: Halloween, all of the others are in different continuities.

I dont think you'll be too lost... you may want to rent the first Rob Zombie Halloween.

Will do, thanks guys :up:

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:14 PM
I wonder if I saw the producers cut.....There is the producers cut somewhere floating around on ebay.


I think I may have downloaded it a few years ago off the net. It wasn't in the best condition. In some parts it would be black and white and and the picture quality was off, like in a grainy static like way.

-Arya-
08-13-2009, 09:14 PM
On topic(:eek:)

I actually saw the trailer for this movie for the first time today. I've never seen a single Halloween movie, will I be lost as heck?
Go watch the original 1978 Halloween movie right NOW! No joke. Go...

The Original Bamfer
08-13-2009, 09:14 PM
Will do, thanks guys :up:

You better do!

SsM
08-13-2009, 09:14 PM
There is the producers cut somewhere floating around on ebay.


I think I may have downloaded it a few years ago off the net. It wasn't in the best condition. In some parts it would be black and white and and the picture quality was off, like in a grainy static like way.


I think I may have seen it on a movie channel back in the day.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:15 PM
Is this forum always like this? I hope so :DYou its one big dysfunctional family.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:16 PM
Will do, thanks guys :up:Yeah, do what they said.

Its best to know nothing about the others when watching these two.

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:18 PM
I think I may have seen it on a movie channel back in the day.I know the ending is different. Wasn't the thorn passed onto loomis or something. I don't remember i only seen it once.

I know the Radio personality was originally supposed to be played by Howard Stern.

Sawyer
08-13-2009, 09:19 PM
Go watch the original 1978 Halloween movie right NOW! No joke. Go...

Fixed.

-Arya-
08-13-2009, 09:21 PM
Thanks for the correction :up:

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:21 PM
Fixed.Ultimate Pwnage.:o

Nightmare
08-13-2009, 09:25 PM
Powned!

The Original Bamfer
08-13-2009, 09:27 PM
:csad:... :down

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:31 PM
Powned!That looks funny the way thats spelled.

-Arya-
08-13-2009, 09:34 PM
Ultimate Pwnage.:o

Powned!

:csad:... :down
http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r294/arya1369/737d70cc.gif?t=1250217253

Nightmare
08-13-2009, 09:36 PM
That looks funny the way thats spelled.

:hehe:

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:38 PM
:hehe:It looks like it says Pounded. But its spelled something else.

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 09:52 PM
Things whent sour in here....

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 09:53 PM
Things whent sour in here....Not anymore, were all past that now.:yay:

Spider-ManHero12
08-13-2009, 09:54 PM
^^ Good! :yay:

Michael Myers. :up:

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 10:02 PM
^^ Good! :yay:

Michael Myers. :up:A couple more weeks things should be kicking into high gear.

The trailer for RZ's animated feature film is online. Can't post it though here. It got cartoon bewbs in it.:yay:

CelticPredator
08-13-2009, 10:19 PM
Good god! This thread is full of jerks! :o


Anyhoo....I dont think i'll catch this in the theater. I didnt see the first one in theaters, I just downloaded the workprint, which was waaaaay better imo....so i'll catch this one on DVD.

Nightmare
08-13-2009, 10:20 PM
<<< Jerk

Sawyer
08-13-2009, 10:21 PM
Good god! This thread is full of jerks! :o

Uh... okay. :dry:

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 10:23 PM
Family Ties: Brad Dourif on HALLOWEEN II (http://www.fangoria.com/features/halloween/3559-family-ties-brad-dourif-on-halloween-ii-.html)



]In case you missed it, FANGORIA RADIO (http://www.fangoria.com/radio) (heard live every Friday on Sirius XM Stars satellite radio, Sirius channel 108/XM channel 139, from 10 p.m.-1 a.m. EST) featured some cool HALLOWEEN II chat with returning actor Brad Dourif (“Sheriff Lee Brackett”). Besides talking up Michael’s latest (due August 28 from Dimension) with hosts Debbie Rochon and Tony Timpone, the actor best known as the voice of Chucky discussed his long career in fear.

DEBBIE ROCHON: We finally have Brad Dourif, which is exciting for us because we’ve never had a chance to speak to you yet. Your sheriff character plays a big central piece in the new movie.
BRAD DOURIF: Well, I haven’t seen it yet. He is far more central than he was in the one before. It’s a bit more, the idea here is it’s a couple of years later and everybody is pretty still much in shellshock and things have disintegrated by quite a bit. And it focuses a bit on my household.

ROCHON: Obviously there’s a lot of secrecy around the storyline, as it should be because we all want to be surprised…
DOURIF: As much as you can, I mean, this is a remake, so we have to work pretty hard.

ROCHON: Yeah, exactly, but what’s funny is it’s a sequel to his original; it’s not a sequel paralleling the other sequel. It’s interesting because you’ve said that your character, the sheriff, is sort of the opposite of the Loomis character in a lot of ways.
DOURIF: Yeah, he’s much more, he’s not arrogant, and he’s pretty much of a stable person who’s much more about victims. It’s his town and he knows everybody and he wants to protect everybody.

ROCHON: He’s not exploiting the situation.
DOURIF: And he feels Loomis is. I think Loomis actually is.

TONY TIMPONE: When we had Danielle Harris on, she said that you and her really bonded since you played father and child.
DOURIF: I feel like she’s my daughter! I miss her.

TIMPONE: Do you have some good scenes together in HII?
DOURIF: We have; there’s some family scenes of Scout’s character, of course, who sort of becomes a part of the family, and Danielle’s character is pretty damaged, physically damaged. It really is, much more a character driven piece than a lot of horror films. A lot of horror films might, if they’re going to develop a character, it really is the villain. Sheriffs are usually pretty one dimensional. This guy’s a little bit more filled out.

ROCHON: I know you’ve played all kinds of characters throughout your career. Is it fun to sort of play the good guy?
DOURIF: Well, you know, I’m a human being, I’ve raised a family. I have grandchildren, and I’ve fallen in love. I’m a hermit, I’m not even that wild, so it’s nice to play people who are really people, who live the same kinds of uneventful life. My life hasn’t been completely uneventful, I’ve made some really stupid mistakes, but beyond that, I see myself as a pretty relatively level headed character, and it’s nice to play one.

ROCHON: Is it harder to play a good guy as opposed to a bad guy, who have more of a hook that’s easier to connect to as an actor?
DOURIF: Well, you’re right, it depends on the character and how subtle the character is. I always look for something to hang on to. I’m a chicken. Give me an accent; give me something so I feel like I’m acting. Now, at my age, I have to really go ahead and be exposed and be more of who I am and it’s kind of scary, but it’s rewarding in a way.

TIMPONE: Did you see any change in Rob Zombie as a director between HALLOWEEN and HALLOWEEN II?
DOURIF: Yes, not as a human being at all, but in terms of really what he was after. Rob has been very much of a lover of horror films; he’s a fan of horror films. In this he wanted to do something different. That was my take on it. And I thought he really got more into the people than he did on the other one. He was innovative on that, but I think he really took a lot of risks on this film. On the first one he was very innovative. I love the first one actually.

ROCHON: Oh, so it’s not true, the rumor that you’ve never seen it?
DOURIF: No, it wasn’t. I have children and there’s no way if they’re in town, they’ll not go. I can’t get out of it, forget it. So they were in town, and I went and I did see it. It didn’t scare me as bad as I thought it would. It was much more mythical almost; it was much more of the myth of a serial killer, much more exposed. Really going back into what’s it like to be a child right at the dawn of becoming a pretty horrendous and horrible killer. The kid was kind of human, you went with him, which is what I would expect a real serial killer to be like, somebody who’s really crazy and yet remarkably human at the same time.

TIMPONE: What are some of the themes that the new film picks up on?
DOURIF: I think it’s family. I’ve always felt in an odd way, these things are about family. But I think this one’s very much about the power and need of family.

You can hear the full interview on iTunes (free FANGO RADIO audio clips are listed in the iTunes Store under the Podcasts tab; simply search for FANGORIA).

http://www.fangoria.com/features/halloween/3559-family-ties-brad-dourif-on-halloween-ii-.html

Lunatic Fringe: Scout Taylor-Compton on HALLOWEEN II (http://www.fangoria.com/features/halloween/3563-lunatic-fringe-scout-taylor-compton-on-halloween-ii-.html)

In case you missed it, FANGORIA RADIO (http://www.fangoria.com/radio) (heard live every Friday on Sirius XM Stars satellite radio, Sirius channel 108/XM channel 139, from 10 p.m.-1 a.m. EST) featured some cool HALLOWEEN II chat from returning actress Scout Taylor-Compton. Besides talking up Michael’s latest (due August 28 from Dimension) with hosts Dee Snider, Debbie Rochon and Tony Timpone, the actress discussed some of the rumors surrounding writer/director Rob Zombie’s new interpretation of the venerable slasher.

DEBBIE ROCHON: How exciting is it being one of the lead stars in Rob Zombie’s HII?
SCOUT TAYLOR-COMPTON: Very, very exciting indeed.

ROCHON: Stepping once again into the Jamie Lee Curtis role. What can you tell us about your character, sort of what you go through? Tony was telling us there’s a little bit of mental illness going on.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: We’re trying to keep it on the down low, especially since it comes out in a month. I think people can wait a month to check it out. The film picks up right after the last one ended, and it kind of just shows what she goes through, that shock that she goes through right after she just shot Michael and then it kicks forward to two years later and it kind of just shows what Laurie Strode has become through the tragic events that she’s gone through. She wakes up and realizes everything in her life has changed and her parents are dead and her friends are dead and it shows how she dealt with it. People deal with things differently, and I know a lot of people are upset with Laurie Strode turning not necessarily bad, but she’s not necessarily the goody-two-shoes Laurie Strode. Going through that traumatic event, it’s perfect the way that Rob Zombie wrote it.

ROCHON: I love the fact that they touch on mental instability because, number one, what she goes through and number two, look at the family genes. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, and you’ve got a pretty rotten apple falling near you.

DEE SNIDER: To continue on your version of Laurie Strode, it’s a lot more white trash. Laurie was a real preppie; you’re a pretty trashy Laurie. That’s not a criticism, just an observation.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: I don’t necessarily take it as that, just imagine putting yourself in that situation. This guy just chased you and killed everything that you know and you have to change your life. Personally, if I was to go through something like that, I would probably close and rebel and not want to talk to anybody and be mentally bothered. And I think that’s what she is. It doesn’t mean white trash.

ROCHON: That’s a compliment from Dee because to him white trash equals sexy.
SNIDER: The household in the original HALLOWEEN was very pristine and now Michael, he’s a trailer park dude pretty much, except, oddly, with a built-in pool in the backyard.

TONY TIMPONE: Scout, tell us the differences between HALLOWEEN I and HALLOWEEN II. Rob has said in interviews that the remake, the first film he did in the series, he felt compromised and it wasn’t the film he really wanted to make and on this one, he had a lot more freedom to do it his way. Do you agree with that?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: I definitely agree with that. The first one was right on tee with the first HALLOWEEN as a remake and this one is actually a Rob Zombie film. It’s definitely his movie, and all the characters are his own. And it’s definitely different that way, the first one was a Dimension film, this is a Rob Zombie film.

TIMPONE: Is it true there was some tension on the set when the shooting schedule was cut by 10 days. Plus there was a lot of bad weather in Atlanta while shooting.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: Gosh, that’s every shoot, dropping days and something going wrong. It wasn’t a stressful shoot at all, the weather was very cold but that’s about it. And studios drop days; that’s just something you have to get used to and just work harder.

SNIDER: How many days was the shoot in total, Scout?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: To be honest, I don’t exactly remember. I think it was a month and a half. It seemed like a longer shoot than it actually was; we were having a great time and working with everybody from the first one.

SNIDER: And you were covered in dirt and blood. That’s what makes it seem longer.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: And there was just a lot more for me to do. I was working every day, which I love.

TIMPONE: What’s the story behind the new look for Michael?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: The new look for Michael, I probably shouldn’t give you too much information on that.

ROCHON: Does he have a blue steel look, like in ZOOLANDER?
SNIDER: I did read he’s got a beard. I saw a picture of the dude with a big beard on.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: How do you think you’d look in two years?
SNIDER: The minute I saw that, I thought, “Well that’s kind of realistic, it’s not like he’s shaving every day, well groomed and well kept, you look like a crazy man.”
TAYLOR-COMPTON: I like the new look.
ROCHON: I like the new look, Dee was just saying the other day why is it that the bad guys who end up in prison or mental institutions come out in better shape than they go in?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: Well that’s the thing. Tyler in this one is a lot scarier than in the first one.
ROCHON: I thought he was very scary in the first one.

TIMPONE: Do you have some more scenes with Malcolm McDowell this time?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: To be honest, I didn’t work with Malcolm very much. We were both in our own little worlds in the movie. We worked together a little bit, but not very much, so it was sad because I didn’t see him as much. When you see Malcolm, it’s fun; it’s always a blast working with him.

ROCHON: It seems as though Rob Zombie is taking the characters very seriously. I mean, gone are the days of Donald Pleasence standing in the middle of the street where he’s brandishing a gun and nobody’s arresting him and he’s saying things like, “I’m not gonna stop until my patient is dead.” He had such funny, wonderful lines, but Rob seems to be taking a far more serious approach to this, which I love.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: Yeah, and it’s much more realistic to be honest than this big speech that doesn’t make any sense to anybody.

ROCHON: Like the ones Tony makes in the office. They’re always really long!
SNIDER: I love those monologues. Donald Pleasence, c’mon!

TIMPONE: Who are some of the other horror veterans that have cameos in this one? Rob loves sneaking his pals in.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: The one who I worked with and is completely amazing is Margot Kidder. That was just amazing. Weird Al is in it.
TIMPONE: As himself right?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: It’ll make sense when you see it.

SNIDER: Going for realism, happen to see Weird Al, it happens!
TAYLOR-COMPTON: Rob will just call anybody and they’ll be there.

ROCHON: And Bill Moseley’s in it?
TAYLOR-COMPTON: Bill’s actually not in it, he was. It didn’t work out.

ROCHON: We should probably let you go. I’m sure you’re busy here on your promotional tour. Thank you so much for joining us on FANGORIA RADIO tonight. And we’re gonna be with you in spirit, and we’re all gonna watch Rob Zombie’s HALLOWEEN II, which opens theatrically August 28. Good luck with it.
TAYLOR-COMPTON: OK, thanks so much you guys.

You can hear the full interview on iTunes (free FANGO RADIO audio clips are listed in the iTunes Store under the Podcasts tab; simply search for FANGORIA).http://www.fangoria.com/features/halloween/3563-lunatic-fringe-scout-taylor-compton-on-halloween-ii-.html

Nightmare
08-13-2009, 10:26 PM
Weird Al!

Only 2 more weeks to go

The Apatow Crew
08-13-2009, 10:29 PM
Weird Al!

Only 2 more weeks to goYes, two more weeks to go.

Imagine if Weird Al was killed my Micheal.:hehe:

Spider-ManHero12
08-14-2009, 01:08 AM
Another really good interview. :up:

Kelly
08-14-2009, 01:21 AM
Good god! This thread is full of jerks! :o


Anyhoo....I dont think i'll catch this in the theater. I didnt see the first one in theaters, I just downloaded the workprint, which was waaaaay better imo....so i'll catch this one on DVD.

Apparently you missed the whole, "jerk" thing earlier....

Whether you name names or not, lets not come into a thread with this type of talk.

CelticPredator
08-14-2009, 02:15 AM
Are you for real? I was totally making a joke....is it that hard to tell the difference? I even used the sarcastic smiley...:o

I dont think anyone has used it for anger....or atleast I havent.

Kelly
08-14-2009, 03:00 AM
Nope, missed the humor part....

CelticPredator
08-14-2009, 03:06 AM
Doesnt have to be funny. :dry:

biolumen
08-14-2009, 04:01 AM
Rob Zombie And Mr. Beaks Talk Halloween II! (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/42049)

Nivek
08-14-2009, 05:37 AM
You guys scared Nivek away :(

Nope, had better things to do last night than watch a Cripple Fight...

The Apatow Crew
08-14-2009, 08:04 AM
nope, had better things to do last night than watch a cripple fight...Cripple Fight!!!!!!!!!

CelticPredator
08-14-2009, 08:07 AM
P-P-Put on yer hat!

The Apatow Crew
08-14-2009, 08:24 AM
kL90Z3ZDBAE

Spider-ManHero12
08-14-2009, 11:02 AM
^^ South Park is alright, but Family Guy wil lalways be 10x better, IMO.

Fresh Prince
08-14-2009, 12:40 PM
Yes, two more weeks to go.

Imagine if Weird Al was killed my Micheal.:hehe:

Yeah I cannot wait to see Weird all in the movie too.

Sawyer
08-14-2009, 01:54 PM
^^ South Park is alright, but Family Guy wil lalways be 10x better, IMO.

They would be on even ground during their first three seasons, prior to the cancellation, but now FG is 100x worse than South Park.

Spider-ManHero12
08-14-2009, 03:32 PM
Awesome new TV spot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3An9V3at6Y

Fanticon
08-14-2009, 05:06 PM
hey...whats all this talk about Halloween 6 producer's cut?

Nightmare
08-14-2009, 05:10 PM
Halloween 666: The Origin of Michael Myers

san15
08-14-2009, 05:16 PM
I don't what there is to be confused about. Seeing as RZ's starts from the start of the Halloween series and the last one in th old series Resurrection has a full grown Micheal.
Plus different people in the roles should tell people.

New audiences will be generally confused with the long running franchise. For example, a kid named Kevin goes to the local video store with his dad and wants to watch a scary movie. Kevin goes to the horror section and sees NINE Halloween movies. Not sure which one to rent first he picks up each and every movie cover and reads the premise. Looking very confused, his dad tells him they’re pretty much the same story retold numerous times and that there’s another Halloween movie coming out. Kevin scratches his head and asks his dad why do they keep making the same movies over and over. Dad says it’s all about making money. So finally Kevin randomly rented whichever Halloween movie that has the best dvd cover.