PDA

View Full Version : Could Rouke be replacement for Nick Fury Role?


Brad_Lewis
02-22-2009, 08:14 AM
Its just I thought, after watching the lil interview w/ Rouke at Mania. Since Rouke is classic method actor that is "a Downey Jr. Fan and thinks they could have a good time together." So you know is got the chops for a rough-neck.

Sin City-he already played a guy w/ a eye-patch, whos a war-torn.
The Wrestler, 9 1/2 Weeks - both show a connection w/ other great actors, and not just a brusier. If his not the Bad-guy then what role is he?

I'm thinking I would be upset generally about the change but, "Fury" role has been changed before, just like Green lantern, or even Spiderman and Flash. People die but the hero goes on. Most will bring up the Hasselhoff role, to kill the idea of a classic "Fury", or mutter the idea that Marvel should not screw w/ what they laid out w/ the Hulk and Iron Man, but you can smell something in the air, and not everyone is going to be happy.

batboy99
02-22-2009, 04:25 PM
.....Fail......


In all seriousness, no he is definetly not Fury. That would just be stupid.

random_havoc
02-25-2009, 08:47 PM
This would be just about the worst decision in the history of decisions.


Would rank right up their with drinking poison cool-aid.

SpiderByte
09-27-2009, 02:09 PM
Sam Jackson IS Nick Fury.

End of story.

Son of Coul
10-09-2009, 08:15 PM
this thread is like seven months old dude

Fresh Prince
10-14-2009, 10:52 AM
Sam Jackson IS Nick Fury.

End of story.

Agreed.

BigSams50
10-15-2009, 11:32 AM
Sam Jackson is the ****, y replace him?

RockSP
03-11-2010, 08:49 PM
Sin City-he already played a guy w/ a eye-patch,

:huh: Marv doesn't wear an eyepatch.

LightningFlash
03-12-2010, 02:34 PM
But a pirate does.

Rourke's going to be in the next Pirate movie!!!!!