View Full Version : Iron Man 2 Official Pictures, News, Gossip, Etc
Aesop Rocks
02-01-2010, 04:24 PM
No sir but I watch a lot of Channel4 .;)
Mr. Earle
02-01-2010, 04:43 PM
You're a 4Channer, Mr. Earle?:cwink:
Wayne Ent financed 4chan under my leadership. Of course Friedrichs disapproved thinking about what Thomas Wayne would have wanted, but Fox was the one to oppose this the most. I booted him from the board and sent him to a dead part of the company. Hahaha, what a fool!
i belive he was refering to AesopI think he is a 4channer as well.
sabetoonth
02-01-2010, 04:44 PM
ive only heard of it from friends
Ace of Knaves
02-01-2010, 05:32 PM
Guy Gardner is the best human Green Lantern. It's so true it hurts.
sabetoonth
02-01-2010, 06:11 PM
i got his classic hair cut ocne, i actually kina looked like him too XD
Spider-Vader
02-01-2010, 06:12 PM
http://i617.photobucket.com/albums/tt260/Deadpool77/Demotivator-Deadpool-FOOLS-DEADPOOL.jpg
SpiderByte
02-01-2010, 06:56 PM
^
Win right there.
Mr. Earle
02-01-2010, 08:14 PM
Guy Gardner is the best human Green Lantern. It's so true it hurts.
There was somebody on the phone. He wouldnt tell me his name so I traced the call to Gotham. All he said was:
"ONE PUNCH!!!" :batty:
I'm kidding, Guy is an amazing character. Like Damian, he is a magnificent bastard! :woot:
xwolverine2
02-01-2010, 09:52 PM
lol i came across this Rockteer poster..... it looks identical to the IronMan poster
hadnt noticed til now
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0/42/868855-rocketeer_ver2_super.jpg
The Navigator
02-01-2010, 09:54 PM
Yet more proof that The Rocketeer is awesome. :up:
SpiderByte
02-02-2010, 08:48 AM
Okay, okay, let's get back on track here.
Sure, the TOY version of the suit with gray on it isn't good. But there's still the chance its the Mark VI-1, not VIV-2.
sabetoonth
02-02-2010, 11:19 AM
lol i came across this Rockteer poster..... it looks identical to the IronMan poster
hadnt noticed til now
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0/42/868855-rocketeer_ver2_super.jpg
must have taken the inspiration
protocida
02-02-2010, 12:24 PM
Okay, okay, let's get back on track here.
http://memegenerator.net/Instances/400/Greedy-Larfleeze-DONT-YOU-DARE-ASK-FOR-COMMON-SENSE-ALL-THE-COMMON-SENSE-IS-MINE.jpg
Sorry, man. Couldn't resist. :hehe:
RealIrOnMaN
02-02-2010, 12:45 PM
Okay guys, enough Green Lantern stuff)) This is IRON MAN 2 TOPIC for God's sake))
Back to Iron Man 2: Super Bowl Trailer. 4 days left (without today's one)! What do YOU expect from the 2nd trailer?
My expectations:
* More Hammer
* More War Machine
* Revelation of MKV or MKVI (Model 2)
* New music (Audioslave was badass in 2008's "Iron Man" spot
* More flight
* Improvement of the special effects (the plane scene still gives me the creeps).
RealIrOnMaN
02-02-2010, 01:18 PM
http://ny-image0.etsy.com//il_fullxfull.119926264.jpg
Mark IV looks pretty tough on mac: http://www.slipperybrick.com/2010/02/iron-man-macbook-decal/
Nightwing
02-02-2010, 01:28 PM
That is pretty ****ing sweet.
RealIrOnMaN
02-02-2010, 01:31 PM
Now THIS is a good Mark IV promo for MacBook, though the background is too green.
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_11-2.jpg (http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/11-2.jpg)
kedrell
02-02-2010, 01:57 PM
I hate Macs(that hippie Steve Jobs can suck my you-know-what) but that first image is pretty cool.
kedrell
02-02-2010, 01:59 PM
must have taken the inspiration
Favs cited Rocketeer, Batman Begins and RoboCop all as inspirations for the film among even others that I can't remember right now.
Dr Lee
02-02-2010, 02:12 PM
http://ny-image0.etsy.com//il_fullxfull.119926264.jpg
Mark IV looks pretty tough on mac: http://www.slipperybrick.com/2010/02/iron-man-macbook-decal/
That is cool as hell......Shame i'm only on a Compaq Laptop... or i'd put that on here...
Iron_Stark
02-02-2010, 02:26 PM
That looks cool.
Immortalfire
02-02-2010, 03:05 PM
Favs cited Rocketeer, Batman Begins and RoboCop all as inspirations for the film among even others that I can't remember right now.
Interesting, given Iron Man was an inspiration for RoboCop :wow:
RealIrOnMaN
02-02-2010, 03:07 PM
These two promos look great:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_12-4.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/12-4.jpg) http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_31.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/31.jpg)
Thanks He-Man for nice find!
Mr. Earle
02-02-2010, 03:21 PM
These two promos look great:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_12-4.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/12-4.jpg) http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_31.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/31.jpg)
Thanks He-Man for nice find!
They look like crap. Why isnt there any grey on his biceps and kneecaps? This is horrible!
:awesome::hehe:
RealIrOnMaN
02-02-2010, 03:29 PM
They look like crap. Why isnt there any grey on his biceps and kneecaps? This is horrible!
:awesome::hehe:
Yeah, why indeed there isn't any grey pieces?
Anyways, I DO dig the first promo.
Dr Lee
02-02-2010, 06:00 PM
This just popped up on Twitter
In ADR with RDJ.
Aesop Rocks
02-02-2010, 06:04 PM
At first I thought that meant "Asgard" but that's wishful thinking.
SpiderByte
02-02-2010, 06:15 PM
I think its automated dialogue replacement.
Dubbing, basically. Probably means their doing voiceovers for the scenes in the suit.
Dr Lee
02-02-2010, 08:21 PM
maybe.... Fine tweaking the Superbowl spot maybe?
SpiderByte
02-02-2010, 08:31 PM
:awesome:
Ghrunter
02-03-2010, 11:06 AM
I think its automated dialogue replacement.
Dubbing, basically. Probably means their doing voiceovers for the scenes in the suit.
Maybe they're at the stage to put Jarvis' bits in too now. Since Paul Bettany mentioned a while back that he hasn't been contacted yet for IM2 so maybe nows the point?
Spider-Steve
02-03-2010, 01:15 PM
Now THIS is a good Mark IV promo for MacBook, though the background is too green.
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_11-2.jpg (http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/11-2.jpg)
Can someone change the green background in white please?
SpiderByte
02-03-2010, 02:23 PM
For the mac image, the one with the green background, how does it apply?
RealIrOnMaN
02-03-2010, 02:45 PM
The confrimation of Mark V comes closer and closer with each day (hope we will see it in the Superbowl Trailer on sunday):
Iron Man 2 Superhero Squad Three-Packs Series 02 - (Movie Wave I-II)
* Iron Man (Mark V), Whiplash and a Drone.
* Iron Man (Mark VI), War Machine and a Drone
Dr Lee
02-03-2010, 03:13 PM
Any word as to when the Superbowl spot will appear online?
RealIrOnMaN
02-03-2010, 03:31 PM
Any word as to when the Superbowl spot will appear online?
It is either sunday (of this week) or monday (next week) - that is for sure!
StarkTheProdigy
02-03-2010, 04:36 PM
most likely with in an hour after it was shown. i know websites like movieweb has a section for superbowl movie spots, and they update it everytime commercials come on during the superbowl
Aesop Rocks
02-03-2010, 04:36 PM
http://marvel.com/news/comicstories.11172.~apos~~apos~iron_man~apos~~apos ~_adaptation_reveals_new_details
protocida
02-03-2010, 04:44 PM
http://i.annihil.us/u/prod/marvel/i/content/st/11172header_banner5232205.jpg
MMMMM...Dounuts
02-03-2010, 06:18 PM
http://i.annihil.us/u/prod/marvel/i/content/st/11172header_banner5232205.jpg
It looks Fury is about to punch Tony's head off. He's going to go all Pulp Fiction "say what again" on Tony's ass
marvel_freshman
02-03-2010, 06:32 PM
http://i50.tinypic.com/ixcgow.jpg
powerbomb1411
02-03-2010, 06:37 PM
War Machine looks pretty bad ass in it.
SpiderByte
02-03-2010, 06:47 PM
http://i50.tinypic.com/ixcgow.jpg
Is that Black Widow behind Tony?
SpiderByte
02-03-2010, 06:49 PM
I found the new trailer!
http://www.lawrenceroadfire.org/images/Fire%20Prevention%20Trailer%20(1).JPG
marvel_freshman
02-03-2010, 06:58 PM
Is that Black Widow behind Tony?
Yep. Shes the only reason I posted it.
Aesop Rocks
02-03-2010, 07:04 PM
Is that Black Widow behind Tony?
Can't ya tell by the manly face? :awesome:
Chewy
02-03-2010, 10:52 PM
:csad:
Paramount is buying ads to tubthump "Shutter Island" and M. Night Shyamalan's "The Last Airbender." It had three spots last year for"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," "Star Trek" and "G.I. Joe." Studio decided not to run an ad for Marvel's "Iron Man 2," as had been previously planned.SOURCE (http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118014680.html?categoryId=13&cs=1)
SpiderByte
02-03-2010, 11:03 PM
If that is true, on Superbowl night, heads will roll.
darkslayer101
02-03-2010, 11:15 PM
wait....there is not im2 tv spot on superbowl??
rashad
02-03-2010, 11:55 PM
Nope, sounds like Paramount changed their minds. Don't know why they would do that. Unless they're holding off the marketing blitz until closer to release.
rashad
02-03-2010, 11:55 PM
*double post
louiebling$
02-04-2010, 12:02 AM
http://i50.tinypic.com/ixcgow.jpg
I don't see anything :csad:
Dr Lee
02-04-2010, 05:09 AM
They've pulled the IM2 spot from Superbowl night???
No point in staying up all night now....
Dr Lee
02-04-2010, 05:20 AM
Curses and Naughty words
StarkTheProdigy
02-04-2010, 06:23 AM
guess who's not watching the superbowl
Iron_Stark
02-04-2010, 07:59 AM
No Superbowl spot?
****ing bull****! :cmad::argh::wall::argh::cmad:
To quote Senator Stern:
Paramount, "F- you pal, F-you buddy"
Now there's no real reason to watch the Superbowl, I can't stand either team, their players and fans.
Deaths Head II
02-04-2010, 09:44 AM
I wasn't going to watch the Superbowl anyway, but I was looking forward to watching a new ad on the internet.
SpiderByte
02-04-2010, 10:03 AM
They might still release a new trailer soon. Just not with the Superbowl.
Iron_Stark
02-04-2010, 10:08 AM
That screen shot looks badass. I hope Black Widow has a large part in the game and they get ScarJo to do the voice.
That kind of sucks but at the same time I don't want to see much more of this film until it's release.
Secretwarrior
02-04-2010, 11:08 AM
i thought a superbowl spot would be cool just to hype the movie for those not in the know. that way IM2 can be sure to gross alot more cash then it already is.
anyone else think all the footage we've seen so far points to just one big hero/villian fight ala IM1? I guess I'm just tired of seeing Mickey Rourke in the same suit whipping the same car for the 100th time lol
Mr. Earle
02-04-2010, 11:26 AM
i thought a superbowl spot would be cool just to hype the movie for those not in the know. that way IM2 can be sure to gross alot more cash then it already is.Ditto.
topdog1
02-04-2010, 12:49 PM
Nope, sounds like Paramount changed their minds. Don't know why they would do that. Unless they're holding off the marketing blitz until closer to release.
I wonder if this is the Disney backlash? Paramount is on borrowed time as a distributor and I think they'll start to phone it in for Marvel projects. I know they still get a percentage and money is king but I just get that feeling.
Promoting those two films is asinine. They dumped Shutter Island in February because it was testing badly and no one cares about Last Airbender. They're either trying to salvage two bad projects or using it as an excuse for their bitter grapes. They signed their contract with Marvel in good faith but never saw Disney coming in and making them lame duck distributors.
FaT_tONle
02-04-2010, 02:19 PM
Shocking. Biggest movie of the summer and no spot. Paramount probably thinks the movie will do fine regardless, but I do get the impression that they will mail it in over the next couple of years.
Aesop Rocks
02-04-2010, 03:54 PM
Actually, I think Paramount is doing a total "**** you, Disney".
SpiderByte
02-04-2010, 04:05 PM
....
How would that work, exactly?
Chris B
02-04-2010, 04:06 PM
I'm disappointed that there wont be a spot, but on the bright side, we should be getting the full theatrical trailer in the next month anyway.
Still, I hope this wasn't a knock on Paramount's part aimed at Disney. I really hope we don't see the marketing of IM2, Thor, Cap, and the Avengers suffer over some dispute.
SpiderByte
02-04-2010, 04:31 PM
Ya.
Though this means we'll get even more badassness from Favs to make up for it.
sabetoonth
02-04-2010, 04:59 PM
http://i.annihil.us/u/prod/marvel/i/content/st/11172header_banner5232205.jpg
love tony's line!
MOVIELORD101
02-04-2010, 05:19 PM
I wonder if this is the Disney backlash? Paramount is on borrowed time as a distributor and I think they'll start to phone it in for Marvel projects. I know they still get a percentage and money is king but I just get that feeling.
Promoting those two films is asinine. They dumped Shutter Island in February because it was testing badly and no one cares about Last Airbender. They're either trying to salvage two bad projects or using it as an excuse for their bitter grapes. They signed their contract with Marvel in good faith but never saw Disney coming in and making them lame duck distributors.
WHAT Disney backlash? It's not like a TV Spot for TRON LEGACY is showing on Sunday! Please explain.
powerbomb1411
02-05-2010, 02:43 AM
Well, see Disney now owns Marvel. So the general rule of thumb is that anything that can be perceived as something negative hurting Marvel is automatically Disney's fault regardless of logic.
powerbomb1411
02-05-2010, 02:43 AM
Well, see Disney now owns Marvel. So the general rule of thumb is that anything that can be perceived as something negative hurting Marvel is automatically Disney's fault regardless of logic.
hame4479
02-05-2010, 04:00 AM
So no tv spot for the super bowl! WTF! I dont even think i have a reason to watch now.
hame4479
02-05-2010, 04:39 AM
Honestly that just ruined my whole month!
He-Man
02-05-2010, 05:52 AM
Also posted this in the Avengers forum....
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2010/02/04/jon-favreau-says-iron-man-2-occurs-before-incredible-hulk-in-marvel-movie-timeline/
'Iron Man 2' Occurs Before 'Incredible Hulk' In Marvel Movie Timeline, Says Jon Favreau
The two-hour season premiere of "Lost" got everyone's timeline senses tingling, but it only took "Iron Man 2" director Jon Favreau one word to clarify fans' understanding of Marvel movie continuity.
When asked via Twitter where (or rather, when) "Iron Man 2" falls in relation to 2008's "Incredible Hulk," Favreau said the upcoming sequel actually falls "before" Edward Norton's adventure as the green goliath.
Of course, this seems to make perfect sense, given what we know of "Iron Man 2" and the final scene of "Incredible Hulk," in which Tony Stark approaches General Ross in a bar to talk with him about his "unusual problem."
In the final "Hulk" scene, Stark asks Ross, "What if I told you we were putting a team together?" — inferring that he's not only aware of Nick Fury's "Avengers" team, but is also a member. This would seem to indicate that the armored superhero's status as a solo act in "Iron Man 2" plays nice with Favreau's timeline for the Marvel movie universe, despite the order in which the films were released.
However, that doesn't mean the brief comment hasn't spawned some questions, too. With Stark appearing to become a member of the Avengers in the time between the finale of "Iron Man 2" and "Incredible Hulk," one has to wonder which of the other Marvel films might fill in the gap in the overall continuity.
Additionally, if "The Avengers" shows us the team's origin, it stands to reason that the 2012 superhero team-up film could actually fall before "Incredible Hulk," too (or possibly run parallel to the "Hulk" timeline).
Got all that? Yeah, me neither... but I think we can all agree that May 7 can't come soon enough.
__________________
RealIrOnMaN
02-05-2010, 07:26 AM
Iron Man 2: Minimates Line Update:
http://www.artasylum.com/blog/2010/02/whoooosh-iron-man2-packaging-is-here/
* Mark V Iron Man and War Machine
* Mark IV Iron Man and Whiplash
* James Rhodes in Mark II Armor and Black Widow
* Toys R Us Exclusives: Senate Hearing Tony Stark and Mark I Iron Man
SpiderByte
02-05-2010, 11:53 AM
So Rhodey will wear the original mark II...hm,.
RealIrOnMaN
02-05-2010, 12:25 PM
So Rhodey will wear the original mark II...hm,.
Guess so, but isn't it a good thing?)
Btw, here's the description of Mark IV and Whiplash from Minimates, which gives some tips on the storyline:
* Mark IV Iron Man: "Six months after battling Iron Monger, Tony Stark continued to don the Iron Man armor despite the consequences of revealing his secret identity to the world. Though clearly dedicated to his cause, is the world ready for Iron Man?"
* Whiplash: "The son of the brilliant Russian scientist, Ivan Vanko uses his father's research and designs to create his own high-tech armor and finally complete directly against Iron Man as Whiplash."
RealIrOnMaN
02-05-2010, 12:28 PM
Another PROOF of Mark V's appearence in the movie:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v193/ahai168/mb23.jpg
Thanks ImOK for the clue.
RealIrOnMaN
02-05-2010, 12:38 PM
Better look at Whiplash Showdown: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mega-Bloks-Ironman-Whiplash-Showdown/dp/B0030XNE4I
antonydavanzo
02-05-2010, 02:51 PM
Also posted this in the Avengers forum....
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2010/02/04/jon-favreau-says-iron-man-2-occurs-before-incredible-hulk-in-marvel-movie-timeline/
'Iron Man 2' Occurs Before 'Incredible Hulk' In Marvel Movie Timeline, Says Jon Favreau
The two-hour season premiere of "Lost" got everyone's timeline senses tingling, but it only took "Iron Man 2" director Jon Favreau one word to clarify fans' understanding of Marvel movie continuity.
When asked via Twitter where (or rather, when) "Iron Man 2" falls in relation to 2008's "Incredible Hulk," Favreau said the upcoming sequel actually falls "before" Edward Norton's adventure as the green goliath.
Of course, this seems to make perfect sense, given what we know of "Iron Man 2" and the final scene of "Incredible Hulk," in which Tony Stark approaches General Ross in a bar to talk with him about his "unusual problem."
In the final "Hulk" scene, Stark asks Ross, "What if I told you we were putting a team together?" — inferring that he's not only aware of Nick Fury's "Avengers" team, but is also a member. This would seem to indicate that the armored superhero's status as a solo act in "Iron Man 2" plays nice with Favreau's timeline for the Marvel movie universe, despite the order in which the films were released.
However, that doesn't mean the brief comment hasn't spawned some questions, too. With Stark appearing to become a member of the Avengers in the time between the finale of "Iron Man 2" and "Incredible Hulk," one has to wonder which of the other Marvel films might fill in the gap in the overall continuity.
Additionally, if "The Avengers" shows us the team's origin, it stands to reason that the 2012 superhero team-up film could actually fall before "Incredible Hulk," too (or possibly run parallel to the "Hulk" timeline).
Got all that? Yeah, me neither... but I think we can all agree that May 7 can't come soon enough.
__________________
Interesting, maybe the other heros films fall before TIH as well, this could possibly mean they go after the hulk in the Avengers.
sabetoonth
02-05-2010, 03:01 PM
Also posted this in the Avengers forum....
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2010/02/04/jon-favreau-says-iron-man-2-occurs-before-incredible-hulk-in-marvel-movie-timeline/
'Iron Man 2' Occurs Before 'Incredible Hulk' In Marvel Movie Timeline, Says Jon Favreau
The two-hour season premiere of "Lost" got everyone's timeline senses tingling, but it only took "Iron Man 2" director Jon Favreau one word to clarify fans' understanding of Marvel movie continuity.
When asked via Twitter where (or rather, when) "Iron Man 2" falls in relation to 2008's "Incredible Hulk," Favreau said the upcoming sequel actually falls "before" Edward Norton's adventure as the green goliath.
Of course, this seems to make perfect sense, given what we know of "Iron Man 2" and the final scene of "Incredible Hulk," in which Tony Stark approaches General Ross in a bar to talk with him about his "unusual problem."
In the final "Hulk" scene, Stark asks Ross, "What if I told you we were putting a team together?" — inferring that he's not only aware of Nick Fury's "Avengers" team, but is also a member. This would seem to indicate that the armored superhero's status as a solo act in "Iron Man 2" plays nice with Favreau's timeline for the Marvel movie universe, despite the order in which the films were released.
However, that doesn't mean the brief comment hasn't spawned some questions, too. With Stark appearing to become a member of the Avengers in the time between the finale of "Iron Man 2" and "Incredible Hulk," one has to wonder which of the other Marvel films might fill in the gap in the overall continuity.
Additionally, if "The Avengers" shows us the team's origin, it stands to reason that the 2012 superhero team-up film could actually fall before "Incredible Hulk," too (or possibly run parallel to the "Hulk" timeline).
Got all that? Yeah, me neither... but I think we can all agree that May 7 can't come soon enough.
__________________
i hate it when they do this, why cant things happen in the year/order they are realeased unless otherwise stated IN THE FILM ITSELF?
night0205
02-05-2010, 03:28 PM
I thought this information was obvious. We know in Iron Man 2, Fury continually tries and gets Stark to join, so obviously it comes before his appearance in Hulk. It really isn't that complicated, and it sounds like it's the only misplaced movie out of the bunch. Thor, either happens after Iron Man 2, or along side it. Captain America happens in 1942... then I assume after Iron Man 2, and either along side or after Thor. Having a mix mashed time-line doesn't mother me in the least, in fact I kinda like it.
sabetoonth
02-05-2010, 03:48 PM
it doesnt bug me too much, but when htings seem one way, and then this ahppens, its almsot like a retcon etc, i guess i can stand it
Chewy
02-05-2010, 03:55 PM
I thought this information was obvious. We know in Iron Man 2, Fury continually tries and gets Stark to join, so obviously it comes before his appearance in Hulk.
Exactly, but MTV loves to make articles out of non-news items
Aztec
02-05-2010, 04:30 PM
Exactly, but MTV loves to make articles out of non-news items
LOL. So true. Half of their "news" is utterly useless.
I love your avatar by the way. Add Fury to complete the 2012 line-up!
kedrell
02-05-2010, 04:31 PM
Heh, no superbowl spot? Well then I won't need to waste time watching the game then and will be able to catch some zzzzzzzz. I agree with Figs though, I'm happy that this means that I will know less about the story when I go to see the movie.
marvel_freshman
02-05-2010, 04:52 PM
I know right, It was pretty obvious. The timeline is pretty obvious as well. It goes according to the film releases.
Iron Man 2 occurs before Incredible Hulk, because they wanted to get Hulk out of the way right then, so they couldn't release an Iron Man origin & a sequel the same year. Thor would occur after Iron Man 1/2 & Incredible Hulk. Of course we know Captain America begins before all of the films. They released it last because the ending of the film leads directly to The Avengers. So, in case you are confused:
First Avenger's Beginning
Hulk's Origin
Iron Man
Iron Man 2
Incredible Hulk
Thor
First Avenger's Ending
Avengers
POSSIBLE SEQUELS
Iron Man 3
Incredible Hulk Returns
Ant-Man, I pray, they come up with a better title.
S.H.I.E.L.D Rise of HYDRA
Avengers 2 Hydra's return
darkslayer101
02-05-2010, 04:56 PM
no superbowl spot??
wat a buzzkill...
I_am_iron_man
02-05-2010, 05:59 PM
I don't know but if i remember Iron Man 2 wasn't on Marvel's plan when they filmed The incredible Hulk. So it's clear why they have make confusion around.
If Marvel was sure to make IM2, the cameos were better in these form:
- Iron Man: Nick Fury's scene.
- The Incredible Hulk: no Stark cameo in the end. Maybe - better - an Hank Pym's cameo.
- Iron Man 2: in the end show the scene with Ross.
It was better, to me.
Nightmare
02-05-2010, 06:06 PM
I dont come in here often.
Ed Norton has a cameo in this?
I_am_iron_man
02-05-2010, 06:18 PM
I dont come in here often.
Ed Norton has a cameo in this?
He said no. But, well, maybe on May we'll have the surprise.
I remember some visual effects supervisors on Twitter that answers to many fans when they say that Norton don't cameo in IM2. They said "Norton is Banner, not Hulk.". Maybe we'll have some Hulk's cameos?
And in the end maybe we'll have some Thor's cameos...Maybe.
topdog1
02-05-2010, 06:25 PM
Well, see Disney now owns Marvel. So the general rule of thumb is that anything that can be perceived as something negative hurting Marvel is automatically Disney's fault regardless of logic.
It's called business. Disney inherited all of Marvel's contracts. That includes their deal with Paramount to distribute the next few films. Once that contract is over, Disney will no longer use Paramount. This makes them lame duck distributors at best. Why should Paramount bust a nut when they know that they will never partner with Marvel again? Most experts agree and think they'll start to phone it in for Marvel projects. There's even talk that Disney has used considerable resources to comb over all those Marvel contracts. Disney lawyers are charged with enforcing every parameter of those contracts hoping to find a breach and reverting rights back to Disney/Marvel. So, Paramount will still want their payday but it's not a great environment and won't produce the best results. Follow the logic now???
darkslayer101
02-05-2010, 09:58 PM
i dont know wat paramount was thinking...
shutter islands,, seriously...:cmad:
hopefully there will be a trailer this month...
Chewy
02-05-2010, 10:09 PM
It's called business. Disney inherited all of Marvel's contracts. That includes their deal with Paramount to distribute the next few films. Once that contract is over, Disney will no longer use Paramount. This makes them lame duck distributors at best. Why should Paramount bust a nut when they know that they will never partner with Marvel again? Most experts agree and think they'll start to phone it in for Marvel projects. There's even talk that Disney has used considerable resources to comb over all those Marvel contracts. Disney lawyers are charged with enforcing every parameter of those contracts hoping to find a breach and reverting rights back to Disney/Marvel. So, Paramount will still want their payday but it's not a great environment and won't produce the best results. Follow the logic now???
To make money. I.E. the only reason they're in business in the first place.
This post is ridiculous. Especially the "most experts agree" :o
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 02:41 AM
REJOICE, MARK V IS OFFICIAL (come on, LOOK at the BRIEFCASE):
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v193/ahai168/megab1.jpg
kedrell
02-06-2010, 04:57 AM
The thing I am most worried about(as I said in the Thor news thread) is how this Disney stuff will affect marketing for these films. IM2 really doesn't need too much marketing since IM1 is the main reason people are going to see the next movie. But having decent marketing could mean the difference between IM2 just barely beating TF2's gross or going full bore and beating TDK's gross. Both would be completely successful but which would YOU rather have happen?
And all the other films really need good marketing to be successful since they are unknowns to the GA.
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 06:47 AM
I finally get it! Mark V Armor is UNDER Stark's Race Costume. Just look at it:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_12-5.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/12-5.jpg)
http://blog.newsok.com/nerdage/files/2009/08/2010_iron_man_tony_stark.jpg
It looks so tough and uncomfortable, I'm bettin it's under the Race Costume. In THAT CASE it would really look realistic.
Briefcase should have only 2 gloves and the helmet. That explains all.
nothing shows up in the link you gave
AnorexicBatman
02-06-2010, 07:40 AM
The Mark V sounds like Modular + Silver Centurion (looks like it) armor with a bit of Extremis thrown in. If it's under his race suit that means neither is it heavy nor very thick to protect him from attacks. Most likely for hit & run attacks.
AnorexicBatman
02-06-2010, 07:40 AM
edit
SurfDUI
02-06-2010, 09:04 AM
Deuces fellas.
I've enjoyed all the spoilers, holla at you the first week of May.
*unsubscribes*
Immortalfire
02-06-2010, 09:21 AM
Exactly, but MTV loves to make articles out of non-news items
Ultimate truth
Khemik@L
02-06-2010, 09:21 AM
I don't know but if i remember Iron Man 2 wasn't on Marvel's plan when they filmed The incredible Hulk. So it's clear why they have make confusion around.
If Marvel was sure to make IM2, the cameos were better in these form:
- Iron Man: Nick Fury's scene.
- The Incredible Hulk: no Stark cameo in the end. Maybe - better - an Hank Pym's cameo.
- Iron Man 2: in the end show the scene with Ross.
It was better, to me.
Well I guess the reason they did it that way was to show the general audience (non-comic book readers/fans) that they were crossing movies.
Let's consider it: If they had used Pym then nobody but the comic book fans would have any idea what it means or who Pym is. Also you have to consider they have not cast Pym as yet.
Stark however was already cast and was release the same year so it would be fresh in movie go-ers minds so when they see him they would IMMEDIATELY connect the dots and know that these two movies are interconnected.
I believe they were more concern with sending the message than chronological order.
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 09:42 AM
Another proof (yeah, I know) of Mark V's existence:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/Old%20Stuff/th_7fef_1.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/Old%20Stuff/7fef_1.jpg)
http://www.target.com/Mega-Brands-Tri-Armor-Iron-Suitcase/dp/B002YTCKZ8
It's a replica of Stark's suitcase from "Monaco's Clash". Includes:
* Mark II
* Mark IV
* Mark V
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 11:15 AM
Wait a second...if the suits under his outfit...
Then the helmet and gauntlets are in the case! The armor is for body protection, but he didn't think he'd need the repulsors and JARVIS' in a race.
kedrell
02-06-2010, 11:17 AM
Well I guess the reason they did it that way was to show the general audience (non-comic book readers/fans) that they were crossing movies.
Let's consider it: If they had used Pym then nobody but the comic book fans would have any idea what it means or who Pym is. Also you have to consider they have not cast Pym as yet.
Stark however was already cast and was release the same year so it would be fresh in movie go-ers minds so when they see him they would IMMEDIATELY connect the dots and know that these two movies are interconnected.
I believe they were more concern with sending the message than chronological order.
Makes perfect sense to me.
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 11:57 AM
Wait a second...if the suits under his outfit...
Then the helmet and gauntlets are in the case! The armor is for body protection, but he didn't think he'd need the repulsors and JARVIS' in a race.
That's what I told everyone today))
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 12:03 PM
Whoops. Missed that bit.
darkslayer101
02-06-2010, 12:54 PM
i think paramount would leak the tv spot online since it could not be shown at the superbowl...
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 12:56 PM
i think paramount would leak the tv spot online since it could not be shown at the superbowl...
That's the most possible theory now.
Would've been GREAT, if they would LEAK THE SPOT TOMORROW, instead of showing it on the Superbowl tomorrow.
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 01:17 PM
Tomorrow, or sometime within the month.
Who knows? Maybe we'll get an A-Team trailer to replace the Iron Man trailer :awesome:
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 01:21 PM
Mark IV:
http://www.**************.com/images/users/uploads/9723/mark4.jpg
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 01:24 PM
Tomorrow, or sometime within the month.
Who knows? Maybe we'll get an A-Team trailer to replace the Iron Man trailer :awesome:
Yeah, it would be cool.
But obviously, the tv-spot will be cool only in one case:
* More Hammer
* More War Machine
* Revelation of MKV or MKVI (Model 2)
* New music (Audioslave was badass in 2008's "Iron Man" spot
* More flight
* Improvement of the special effects (the plane scene still gives me the creeps).
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 01:26 PM
Mark IV:
http://www.**************.com/images/users/uploads/9723/mark4.jpg
You went for a loooooong tiiiiime promo, but still I like the armor) Looks better than Mark VI with the silver spots.
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 01:39 PM
Again with the silver.
Guys, seriously. If it were so horribly bad, why wouldn't you have noticed it before? I think it looks better ON SCREEN than it does on the toy.
Hell, the toy might not even be fully painted. The parts are silver, but the bits on the toy were the same color as when we saw the unpainted War Machine figure.
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 01:49 PM
Again with the silver.
Guys, seriously. If it were so horribly bad, why wouldn't you have noticed it before? I think it looks better ON SCREEN than it does on the toy.
Hell, the toy might not even be fully painted. The parts are silver, but the bits on the toy were the same color as when we saw the unpainted War Machine figure.
Actually, from now on I'm interested only in Mark IV and MK V, 'cause I need to know, how MKIV will disappear/upgraded and what will happen with MKV after clash with Whiplash.
MKVI isn't that interesting, in my opinion. Just the upgraded armor, with the triangle chestplate - to save Stark from virus.
Btw, there is another theory on Whiplash, I came up with. Remember that ET Report scene, where Hapy drives down into Whiplash and Ivan gets smacked by the car?
And remember the Whiplash Action Figure, that shows some metal stuff on his legs? I guess, this stuff (or maybe proto suit) helped him to survive the car attack. Otherwise, if Vanko didn't had anything on his legs, he already would've been toasted.
shogunrua
02-06-2010, 01:49 PM
Wait a second...if the suits under his outfit...
Then the helmet and gauntlets are in the case! The armor is for body protection, but he didn't think he'd need the repulsors and JARVIS' in a race.
ok I really hope you'll understand me (because I'm not fluent in english lol) but yeah I agree with the theory that Stark might have a part of the suit under his racing outfit, but the more I look at that Mark V picture, the more I have the fealing that the suitcase could be more than just the gauntlets and the helmet, because (and now my lack of english skills kick in lol) that Mark V doesn't look to have big pieces of armor like Mark III but that it is composed of small pieces together, pieces that could fold very well...in a suitcase :) (man I really hope you see my point lol)
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 01:52 PM
ok I really hope you'll understand me (because I'm not fluent in english lol) but yeah I agree with the theory that Stark might have a part of the suit under his racing outfit, but the more I look at that Mark V picture, the more I have the fealing that the suitcase could be more than just the gauntlets and the helmet, because (and now my lack of english skills kick in lol) that Mark V doesn't look to have big pieces of armor like Mark III but that it is composed of small pieces together, pieces that could fold very well...in a suitcase :) (man I really hope you see my point lol)
I see you point CLEARLY)))
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fubugDhquvs&hl=ru_RU&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fubugDhquvs&hl=ru_RU&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Mr. Earle
02-06-2010, 01:53 PM
Again with the silver.
Guys, seriously. If it were so horribly bad, why wouldn't you have noticed it before? I think it looks better ON SCREEN than it does on the toy.
Because we ve only seen the suit in one screenshot of the movie where all **** is going on, its night and there's gun flare everywhere. So it wasnt so apparent. In broad daylight though it'll look horrible. I was actually very happy that the suit had so much more gold this time, but then...
sabetoonth
02-06-2010, 01:58 PM
Again with the silver.
Guys, seriously. If it were so horribly bad, why wouldn't you have noticed it before? I think it looks better ON SCREEN than it does on the toy.
Hell, the toy might not even be fully painted. The parts are silver, but the bits on the toy were the same color as when we saw the unpainted War Machine figure.
i know, its a big fuss overe semhtign small
protocida
02-06-2010, 02:06 PM
No Spot?
http://memegenerator.net/Instances/816/Raging-Atrocitus-GODDAM-IT-PARAMOUNT-NOBODY-CARES-ABOUT-SHUTTER-ISLAND.jpg
Dr Lee
02-06-2010, 02:09 PM
Please don't start that up again....... LOL
Wonder when (or even IF) the spot made for the Superbowl will be released?
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 02:09 PM
Oh geez not this again.
Actually, I change my mind. I'm bored. Go ahead.
RealIrOnMaN
02-06-2010, 02:15 PM
HA-HA-HA-HA-HA
@Jon_Favreau - TWITTE (http://twitter.com/Jon_Favreau)
Just wrapped a Maxim shoot. Don't worry, I kept my clothes on.
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 02:24 PM
:lmao:
Favs is hillarious.
Batfan2289
02-06-2010, 05:10 PM
http://www.cmt.com/sitewide/assets/img/shows/trick_my_truck/season_four/403/trick_my_truck_6275-x600.jpg
http://media.comicmix.com/media/2008/05/08/irontruck2.jpg
http://www.monsterjam.com/images3/ironmanimage2.jpg
Spider-Vader
02-06-2010, 07:09 PM
I want that truck....Now.
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 07:28 PM
Transformers crossover!
The Navigator
02-06-2010, 07:31 PM
One shall stand, one shall stagger in drunk
the alamo rippe
02-06-2010, 08:00 PM
REJOICE, MARK V IS OFFICIAL (come on, LOOK at the BRIEFCASE):
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v193/ahai168/megab1.jpg
what the hell is that giant robot?
SpiderByte
02-06-2010, 08:00 PM
:lmao:
AnorexicBatman
02-06-2010, 08:06 PM
IRON-OPTIMUS FTW! That is one cool truck.
Aluchak
02-07-2010, 12:41 AM
MARK V!!!
http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=14655
AnorexicBatman
02-07-2010, 12:52 AM
I think it would awesome if instead of flight, the Mk V allows for enhanced agility and allows Stark to movie fast.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 03:22 AM
MARK V!!!
http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=14655
Actually, I posted this theory earlier 1 or 2 pages before and in the toy thread)
+ I TOLD YOU GUYS BACK IN THE DECEMBER))
Jostru
02-07-2010, 05:18 AM
I really can't wait to see the Mark V in action. It'll be awesome as hell!
Give us a new trailer already!
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 09:48 AM
I finally get it! Mark V Armor is UNDER Stark's Race Costume. Just look at it:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_12-5.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/12-5.jpg)
http://blog.newsok.com/nerdage/files/2009/08/2010_iron_man_tony_stark.jpg
It looks so tough and uncomfortable, I'm bettin it's under the Race Costume. In THAT CASE it would really look realistic.
Briefcase should have only 2 gloves and the helmet. That explains all.
I still think, that Stark has an armor under his Race Costume:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_RDJ.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/RDJ.jpg)
Dr Lee
02-07-2010, 10:39 AM
Just popped up on Twitter....
First day in London scoring Iron Man. Takes a day to stop white knuckling the backseat driving with the driver on the right.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 10:47 AM
Actually, I wouldn't mind to hear even one track of Debney's IM2 OST, no, really.
Djawadi's OST for the first movie was fantastic. I hope, that Debney's one will be great too.
kedrell
02-07-2010, 11:15 AM
Debney said he wants to build on Djawadi's score(makes sense to me, I loved that score) and get to the point where Iron Man has his own recognizable theme. Obviously he must mean something other than the Black Sabbath tune then, otherwise Iron Man already HAS a theme. I'm really looking forward to what they come up with.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 11:42 AM
Debney said he wants to build on Djawadi's score(makes sense to me, I loved that score) and get to the point where Iron Man has his own recognizable theme. Obviously he must mean something other than the Black Sabbath tune then, otherwise Iron Man already HAS a theme. I'm really looking forward to what they come up with.
SURE IT HAS
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0xyDyDfOlHc&hl=ru_RU&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0xyDyDfOlHc&hl=ru_RU&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
kedrell
02-07-2010, 11:43 AM
hehe, well I'd like something even newer than that.
kedrell
02-07-2010, 11:45 AM
Not much but it's sort of interesting and pertains to the behind the scenes design stuff for the movie(but not exclusively just this movie):
XWjQBR_FZCY
SpiderByte
02-07-2010, 12:06 PM
I was staring at the Iron Man suit and not listening to a word he said. The whole time.
kedrell
02-07-2010, 01:53 PM
I'm not sure but I think it's a machine that you can insert a design for some conceptual model(via software) and it will construct the model in actuality in a fraction of the time it would take a sculptor to do it.
Turtles
02-07-2010, 02:05 PM
I still think, that Stark has an armor under his Race Costume:
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/th_RDJ.jpg (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/RDJ.jpg)
I have one problem with that theory: how is he going to get his race suit off in the heat of battle? Does it have snaps on the side so he can rip it off like a male stripper?
If he doesn't remove the race suit, how are we going to know the armor is even there? Will it be one of those scenarios where the actor's clothing gets torn and the armor shows underneath? Pfft.....where is the dramatic reveal? Will it be like the duel in Back to the Future, part III, where you only learn AFTER the battle that the main character had protection on under his clothes?
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 02:28 PM
I have one problem with that theory: how is he going to get his race suit off in the heat of battle? Does it have snaps on the side so he can rip it off like a male stripper?
If he doesn't remove the race suit, how are we going to know the armor is even there? Will it be one of those scenarios where the actor's clothing gets torn and the armor shows underneath? Pfft.....where is the dramatic reveal? Will it be like the duel in Back to the Future, part III, where you only learn AFTER the battle that the main character had protection on under his clothes?
1) Using uni-beam or something else to get from the Race costume.
2) Dunno 'bout the snaps, brother.
3) I think, they will show the sequence of Stark adapting to MKV BEFORE the race in Monaco OR it will be like in "Sherlock Holmes" - first the trick, and then the revelation of the trick itself.
JKKS085
02-07-2010, 02:31 PM
It's technically impossible for Stark to wear an armor under his race outfit.
I think that the Mark 5 (which is not a full armor, if my informations are accurate) is most likely supposed to go over his racing suit.
protocida
02-07-2010, 02:35 PM
^ Correct. The suitcase has red and silver parts and appears to be quite heavy. It's probabily the whole armor.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 02:43 PM
^ Correct. The suitcase has red and silver parts and appears to be quite heavy. It's probabily the whole armor.
COME ON!! It would be SO UNREAL!! DAMN THOSE ELECTRIC WHIPS and DRONES TO HELL! HEY, LOOK! IT'S FREAKING MAGIC BRIEFCASE THAT TURNS INTO ARMOR? HOW COOL IS THAT??
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fubugDhquvs&hl=ru_RU&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fubugDhquvs&hl=ru_RU&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Are you kidding me? To hell with IM Season 1 version ^ This is INSANE, if you ask me. So, I'll go with my "MKV under Stark Costume" version. No offense guys.
protocida
02-07-2010, 02:45 PM
:dry:
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 02:48 PM
:dry:
What? Technically - it is impossible to carry the armor under the suit, BUT - it is also impossible and weird to have a normal metal briefcase turning into the armor.
Dr Lee
02-07-2010, 02:50 PM
What if it's just the Helmet, gloves and feet? I would think Stark can fly well enough by then... so maybe he has a spare set in the Rolls for emergencies?
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 02:56 PM
What if it's just the Helmet, gloves and feet? I would think Stark can fly well enough by then... so maybe he has a spare set in the Rolls for emergencies?
Yeah, it reminds me of the Ultimate Stark - he always had a special crew in cases the armor needs to be putted on Tony or just to repair the damage.
I think, that briefcase contains 2 gloves, (maybe even 2 halfs of Mask - look at the faceplate (http://s590.photobucket.com/albums/ss343/IrOnPaTrIoT/Old%20Stuff/7fef_1.jpg)), but no boots, I guess...
JKKS085
02-07-2010, 03:21 PM
I think that everyone will have to admit (one day or another) that the briefcase contains the whole suit. Look how heavy it looks in the ET featurettes, Pepper can barely carry it ! It can't be just the gloves and the helmet.
Maybe the look of the Mark 5 itself is the clue to understand everything. The fact that it seems to be made with a hundred of different pieces (on the chest, arms and legs) means that it's probably foldable. Same with the helmet.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 03:25 PM
I think that everyone will have to admit that the briefcase contains the whole suit. Look how heavy it look in the ET featurettes, Pepper can barely carry it ! It can't be just the gloves and the helmet.
Maybe the look of the Mark 5 itself is the clue to understand everything. The fact that it seems to be made with a hundred of different pieces (on the chest, arms and legs) means that it's probably foldable. Same with the helmet.
Even if so, it is TOO UNREAL - especially techically.
* PS: I'm happy, that everyone already admitted, that MKV is existing - it is a very good thing)
protocida
02-07-2010, 03:29 PM
Even if so, it is TOO UNREAL - especially techically.
When we did not believe there was a Mark V, you said a suit in a suitcase wouldn't be unrealistic in a world with eletrical whips and robotic drones. Now, it is? :huh:
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 03:35 PM
When we did not believe there was a Mark V, you said a suit in a suitcase wouldn't be unrealistic in a world with eletrical whips and robotic drones. Now, it is? :huh:
The exact opposite
protocida
02-07-2010, 03:41 PM
The exact opposite
A thin folding suit with near zero firepower contained in a big and heavy suitcase? No, not unrealistic. A regular Iron Man suit contained in a regular transforming suitcase, which was what everyone tough of once they heard of Mark V? Yes, unrealistic.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 03:42 PM
When we did not believe there was a Mark V, you said a suit in a suitcase wouldn't be unrealistic in a world with eletrical whips and robotic drones. Now, it is? :huh:
+ THE PURPOSE of my then "to prove Mark V' existence" post was to show people, that Tony Stark MAY HAVE ANOTHER SUIT IN THE MOVIE.
It is the other problem - how Stark will put this armor on.
So, no hard feelings proto)
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 03:44 PM
A thin folding suit with near zero firepower contained in a big and heavy suitcase? No, not unrealistic. A regular Iron Man suit contained in a regular transforming suitcase, which was what everyone tough of once they heard of Mark V? Yes, unrealistic.
1) That was back in the Bob Layton Era + it was unreal. Read Warren Ellis's Extremis - here there is a good quote by Tony about the briefcase situation.
kedrell
02-07-2010, 03:56 PM
* PS: I'm happy, that everyone already admitted, that MKV is existing - it is a very good thing)
It's been a while since we doubted the MV existed in the movie(Redd confirmed it a long ways back). What we've been doubting is that it's a folding suitcase suit. At least, that's what I've been doubting since I still don't see how it can be believable.
JKKS085
02-07-2010, 03:59 PM
If I'm not mistaken, the only think that Tony says is that the fact he added more and more functions to his suit is the reason why he can't put it in a case anymore.
And it ends with him finding a way to put his Extremis suit in a briefcase.
Actually I don't see anything unbelievable (or less believable than everything else we saw and will see in both Iron Man 1 and 2) in that "briefacse thing". Especially if the suit was designed to be folded, which could be to be the case (once more look how the suit seems to be made of a hundred of little elements). I mean considering the Mark 5 has a back up protective suit (which may not be a full armor by the way) is not unrealistic at all (or less realistic than the simple idea of a man in that kind of suit).
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 04:11 PM
It's been a while since we doubted the MV existed in the movie(Redd confirmed it a long ways back). What we've been doubting is that it's a folding suitcase suit. At least, that's what I've been doubting since I still don't see how it can be believable.
Oh, it first started with the blurry teaser of Wave 2 of toys, which I posted in december + and after some time somebody (I guess, it was SpiderByte) asked Redd about MKV and she confirmed the armor's existence.
But yeah, now the briefcase situation is one of the most interesting thing to discuiss in this great movie)
Antonello Blueberry
02-07-2010, 04:13 PM
The suitcase turning into the armor was an idea Stuart Gordon had when he was supposed to direct an Iron Man movie centuries ago. Neal Adams did the designs for that movie.
RealIrOnMaN
02-07-2010, 04:15 PM
The suitcase turning into the armor was an idea Stuart Gordon had when he was supposed to direct an Iron Man movie centuries ago. Neal Adams did the designs for that movie.
Too bad, that Adams's designs weren't leaked online or something)
Gosh, what a pleasure to discuss IM2 here with all of you guys)
Spider-Vader
02-07-2010, 06:11 PM
With so many versions of Mark V being made into toys, it'll probably be in the movie. Why else would there be so many versions?
Avengers-Report
02-07-2010, 08:45 PM
Just watched the Super Bowl, ummm where was Iron Man?
Darkness Falls
02-07-2010, 08:51 PM
is the spot on youtube yet ?
Rocker22
02-07-2010, 08:55 PM
The TV Spot was canceled you guys that was announced earlier this week.
Iron_Stark
02-07-2010, 08:56 PM
No Superbowl spot and the goddamn Saints just won. :cmad::cmad::cmad::cmad::cmad::cmad:
Worst. Superbowl. EVER. :cmad:
Avengers-Report
02-07-2010, 08:58 PM
Wow no spot, terrible news. I thought it was confirmed a long time ago? Dangg
darkslayer101
02-07-2010, 11:27 PM
http://www.**************.com/fansites/BrentSprecher/news/?a=14703
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6VbOWsZ0jU (kinda funny to watch)
Mace Dolex
02-07-2010, 11:43 PM
Just saw this ad, don't know whether it's the first or second trailer but it is awesome and I'm not even an Iron Man fan but RDJ pulls it off.
One thing I hate is the mandatory rock song by AC/DC that has to be included because the studio thinks it's cool.
J6Olpjl_IrE&feature=related
Dr Lee
02-08-2010, 04:09 AM
That'd the old one...
baerrtt
02-08-2010, 05:43 AM
Just saw this ad, don't know whether it's the first or second trailer but it is awesome and I'm not even an Iron Man fan but RDJ pulls it off.
One thing I hate is the mandatory rock song by AC/DC that has to be included because the studio thinks it's cool.
J6Olpjl_IrE&feature=related
Are you aware that the IM 2 soundtrack is to be comprised with nothing but classic AC/DC songs?
Ghrunter
02-08-2010, 08:09 AM
Just saw this ad, don't know whether it's the first or second trailer but it is awesome and I'm not even an Iron Man fan but RDJ pulls it off.
One thing I hate is the mandatory rock song by AC/DC that has to be included because the studio thinks it's cool.
J6Olpjl_IrE&feature=related
Are you aware that the IM 2 soundtrack is to be comprised with nothing but classic AC/DC songs?
and that Jon Favreau is a huge AC/DC fan, it's not just a case of the studio thinking it's cool
Lots o lafs
02-08-2010, 08:31 AM
iron man is awesome, RDJ makes the movie though.
Bishop49
02-08-2010, 11:26 AM
I think the marketing of this film is about to amp up. http://espn.go.com/ right after the super bowl!
WindsofHorus
02-08-2010, 03:30 PM
If I'm not mistaken, the only think that Tony says is that the fact he added more and more functions to his suit is the reason why he can't put it in a case anymore.
And it ends with him finding a way to put his Extremis suit in a briefcase.
Actually I don't see anything unbelievable (or less believable than everything else we saw and will see in both Iron Man 1 and 2) in that "briefacse thing". Especially if the suit was designed to be folded, which could be to be the case (once more look how the suit seems to be made of a hundred of little elements). I mean considering the Mark 5 has a back up protective suit (which may not be a full armor by the way) is not unrealistic at all (or less realistic than the simple idea of a man in that kind of suit).
he couldn't miniturize the Control Systems, but extremis became the control systems so he was able to go back to a briefcase model.
With the whole Mark V in a briefcase, I'm all for it. The armor was in a briefcase for a long time.
Darkness Falls
02-08-2010, 04:00 PM
any fans in australia
this months empire (mad hatter cover) has a iron man 2 poster (tony stark one)
darkslayer101
02-08-2010, 05:19 PM
I think the marketing of this film is about to amp up. http://espn.go.com/ right after the super bowl!
???
I can't wait until we hit some viral marketing for this!
Also, on a note, re-shoots are all done. Man they were fun.
SpiderByte
02-08-2010, 08:44 PM
Say, Redd, have you started shooting scenes for Thor yet?
Mace Dolex
02-08-2010, 09:35 PM
and that Jon Favreau is a huge AC/DC fan, it's not just a case of the studio thinking it's cool
Well at least it's AC/DC and not George Thorogood's "Bad To The Bone" for the umpteenth time.
iron man is awesome, RDJ makes the movie though.
Yep that's true RDJ's charisma and likability comes off in the movie when I remember when Tom Cruise and Nicolas Cage were being rumored back in the 90's I think maybe those two could've pulled it off.
But now with Cruise's kooky beliefs and Cage's nutty acting choices I'm glad they were no longer considered.
Bishop49
02-08-2010, 09:46 PM
???
You see Iron Man 2 all over espn? Right after the superbowl? Espn right after the superbowl with its coverage and columns is a great spot to advertise hands down.
WORD
Bishop49
02-08-2010, 09:54 PM
I can't wait until we hit some viral marketing for this!
Also, on a note, re-shoots are all done. Man they were fun.
I bet they were awesome! Were new scene's added? I'm not sure if you can answer that.. I know Thor is shooting very close for a reason..
darkslayer101
02-08-2010, 10:42 PM
need tv spot...
Say, Redd, have you started shooting scenes for Thor yet?
Yes.
I bet they were awesome! Were new scene's added? I'm not sure if you can answer that.. I know Thor is shooting very close for a reason..
I am not allowed to say. But DVD extras are going to be awesome!
Bishop49
02-09-2010, 12:13 AM
Thanks Redd you complete me!
Darkness Falls
02-09-2010, 12:38 AM
^^^ what he said *free falls out of plane*
marvel_freshman
02-09-2010, 10:33 AM
Redd you complete us all.
I don't want to ask too much because I know the deal, but can you say whether you will be in Asgard or on earth. I wanna take a guess and say that if you are in Asgard, you'll be...A background warrior?
Shadow-Guardian
02-09-2010, 11:44 AM
Here's a video of that Iron Man helmet coming out soon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYRTdn2g6Ek&feature=sub
The helmet has a button on the side to open and close it, has light up eyes, voice changer with both sounds from the movie, with both Jarvis and Iron man, and is a full helmet, not just a facemask. I'm SO wearing that to the premiere haha.
And I hate Sean Long. Guy get's stuff like that all the time for free. Bastard.
Hotwire
02-09-2010, 12:45 PM
What if the briefcase armor isn't full-fledged armor like the Marks II, III, IV, & VI. Just an emergency, "gotta get outta here," type armor.
Aesop Rocks
02-09-2010, 01:14 PM
I see it being that, I see it only being the gloves.
Because by the time Stark put on his entire suit. Whiplash would have beat the **** out of him with the whips.
D4rkShaDoWz
02-09-2010, 03:00 PM
Was this posted already?
http://www.trendsinternational.com/mm5/graphics/bigImages/6253.jpg
http://www.trendsinternational.com/mm5/graphics/bigImages/6252.jpg
SpiderByte
02-09-2010, 03:08 PM
No.
I like the font used on that War Machine one.
Khemik@L
02-09-2010, 04:48 PM
Yes.
I am not allowed to say. But DVD extras are going to be awesome!
Anybody else here things Redd deserves her own thread? It's kind of Hard to keep track of her. Maybe we can call the thread "Ask Redd"
Bishop49
02-09-2010, 05:27 PM
War Machine is going to spank some A**! I can't wait to see thoses guns blazin. I wonder will his mini gun and guns be designed where they wouldn't overheat?? I think they would all have to be modified.
Redd has my vote for Hottest Nerd of the Year!! Word
Anybody else here things Redd deserves her own thread? It's kind of Hard to keep track of her. Maybe we can call the thread "Ask Redd"
Haha!
I'll try and answer any questions that I can, without breaching my contract.
darkslayer101
02-09-2010, 06:32 PM
"ask Redd"
where did the superbowl spot disappear??
"ask Redd"
where did the superbowl spot disappear??
It fell out of the airplane along with Tony Stark.
sabetoonth
02-09-2010, 06:54 PM
heah whats jon's twitter? im signing up now and wanted to get hi on here so..yeah thanks
SpiderByte
02-09-2010, 06:56 PM
@Redd: Best. Response. Yet.
Have you seen Thor's costume? Sorry if it violates the contract, but...I sorta had to ask.
sabetoonth
02-09-2010, 07:02 PM
Best. Response. Yet.
Have you seen Thor's costume? Sorry if it violates the contract, but...I sorta had to ask.
i loled a this first part
Best. Response. Yet.
Have you seen Thor's costume? Sorry if it violates the contract, but...I sorta had to ask.
You guys are making it really hard on me. Damn.
If I say "YES" then I am going to get a hundred on responses asking what it looks like. "Does it have the classic look or is it revamped like what they did with Iron Man?"
If I say "no" then I am going to get responses like, "damn, sneak onto the stage where you can see it and snap some photos for us!"
You guys are going to have to wait. Sorry. Trust me, it will be well worth it.
SpiderByte
02-09-2010, 07:10 PM
Its okay. It's just one of those mandatory nerd questions.
It's only natural. If I was in your shoes I would be doing the same thing.
I just hope I can get on the movie Captain America that starts in July.
SpiderByte
02-09-2010, 07:23 PM
I'd like to put my "Chick who stalks the Avengers" joke back in now...
Haha!
Hey, I tried to get on the Green Hornet movie but they only wanted older looking women.
I just stalk movies that involve comic book characters.
sabetoonth
02-09-2010, 07:26 PM
HA! i got faveau on now! i was misspellig his name, i feel so bad now for oin that
Mr. Stark
02-09-2010, 07:50 PM
am i the only one here who is worried about this films marketing, i mean first no superbowl spot, and its 3 months away and there isnt even an ACTIVE website. By this time for part 1 there were superbowl ads, posters in times square and 2 trailers....im confused
Yes I would have to agree that the marketing on this one has been a little relaxed. But I am guessing by Valentine's day that we are going to get more marketing.
Or at least I hope.
Mr. Stark
02-09-2010, 08:02 PM
Yes I would have to agree that the marketing on this one has been a little relaxed. But I am guessing by Valentine's day that we are going to get more marketing.
Or at least I hope.
Its almost like they are DEPENDING on the sucess from the 1st one, which i understand but only to a certian extent, you have no idea when im around alot of people at work i say im wicked excited for iron man 2, and 90% of they say WOW they are making a part 2. That shouldnt happen 3 months before the release
Darkness Falls
02-09-2010, 08:09 PM
random question, but i have to know redd
is samuel L jackson as badass in person ? lol XD
random question, but i have to know redd
is samuel L jackson as bad-ass in person ? lol XD
I have not been on set with him. But the crew have told me that he is a really nice guy in person and that he does look like a total bad-ass with the outfit on. But he needs the eye patch. It completes the bad-assness. Without it.... It just doesn't look right. (He takes it off in between scenes.)
Bishop49
02-09-2010, 08:29 PM
Haha!
Hey, I tried to get on the Green Hornet movie but they only wanted older looking women.
I just stalk movies that involve comic book characters.
Yikes! I hope your young redd!
sabetoonth
02-09-2010, 09:03 PM
heah tweet from jon fav
Dinner last night with @edgarwright (https://twitter.com/edgarwright) on his home turf.
1:57 AM Feb 8th (https://twitter.com/Jon_Favreau/status/8803593323)from Echofon (http://echofon.com/)
2AM in London but my body thinks it's six in the evening. The joy of jet lag.
43 minutes ago (https://twitter.com/Jon_Favreau/status/8882592465)from Echofon (http://echofon.com/)
scoring and maybe some antman collaboration?
Son of Coul
02-09-2010, 09:18 PM
^unless he's kidding, no according to Edgar Wright's twitter.
@headgeek666 (http://twitter.com/headgeek666) @Jon_Favreau (http://twitter.com/Jon_Favreau) Amazingly, we talked neither Avengers nor Antman.
Yikes! I hope your young redd!
I am young according to movies and tv world. I am 24.
Green Hornet, they wanted women 30 and older. Or at least looked like they were 30.
Darkness Falls
02-09-2010, 10:06 PM
I have not been on set with him. But the crew have told me that he is a really nice guy in person and that he does look like a total bad-ass with the outfit on. But he needs the eye patch. It completes the bad-assness. Without it.... It just doesn't look right. (He takes it off in between scenes.)
lol thanks redd :awesome::word:
Aesop Rocks
02-09-2010, 10:47 PM
I just hope I can get on the movie Captain America that starts in July.
tell me how london is :)
Here's a question...
Which set is more impressive? Thor or Iron Man 2.
tell me how london is :)
Here's a question...
Which set is more impressive? Thor or Iron Man 2.
Well for Captain America they are thinking about doing there stage stuff here. And then film all the WW2 stuff in London.
Which set is more impressive? That is tuff. I love the IM2 sets. They were huge and just jaw dropping. But I love being on Thor. I get to be a really fun character in this one.
Speaking of huge sets for IM2. Man, the first night I worked on at the Sepulvida dam scene. I had just bought a pair of shoes, and I was really excited so I went out and bought new clothes. In these shoes I had to wear. I had to run down a flight of stairs and to the other side of set.
Man, did I get blisters. And my heels were bloody. On one of the "takes" that we did I lost my shoe going down the stairs and like a typical girl I picked up the shoe at the bottom of the stairs and kept running. And I didn't even miss a beat in running.
All the background around me and the crew were laughing hysterically.
Aesop Rocks
02-09-2010, 10:57 PM
Thanks Redd. I have a few more.
How is Hemsworth between takes? How is the vibe on set? Positive?
Thanks Redd. I have a few more.
How is Hemsworth between takes? How is the vibe on set? Positive?
Nice guy. Vibe on set = awesome.
Aesop Rocks
02-09-2010, 11:03 PM
I know you're just being paid to say that. :awesome:
But no, I really hope Hemsworth is pulling his weight and proves to be a great Thor.
Has any funny "bloopers" happened yet? You don't have to describe the scene or anything, just give a non-contract breaking summary.
Khemik@L
02-09-2010, 11:09 PM
On the Topic of Hemsworth. Is he really as big as everyone is saying he is?
I know you're just being paid to say that. :awesome:
But no, I really hope Hemsworth is pulling his weight and proves to be a great Thor.
Has any funny "bloopers" happened yet? You don't have to describe the scene or anything, just give a non-contract breaking summary.
That is a little hard because all the blooper related stuff involves the scenes we did.
Um,... maybe when I go to work tomorrow we might get a blooper that I can tell. Especially with the kind of scenes that we have been doing...
On the Topic of Hemsworth. Is he really as big as everyone is saying he is?
Well of course he's bigger. I'm 5'3 so of course everyone is bigger in my eyes.
:oldrazz:
Chewy
02-09-2010, 11:40 PM
Redd is Tadanobu Asano as much of a badass in person as he is in his movies?
Redd is Tadanobu Asano as much of a badass in person as he is in his movies?
I have not seen him on set.
sabetoonth
02-10-2010, 12:41 AM
Redd is Tadanobu Asano as much of a badass in person as he is in his movies?
he was totally badass in mongol i love that movie, wish i could find it on dvd here in the states
Fort Max
02-10-2010, 03:01 AM
Lol, this thread has become very Redd centric, can't say I blame people though, must be really amazing getting to work on all these movies, no wonder there's a billion questions. :woot:
SpiderByte
02-10-2010, 08:45 AM
Based on the rate their filming at, when would you say we get concept art or something?
Son of Coul
02-10-2010, 09:55 AM
What are your genuine thoughts on the costume? You don't have to describe it, but give your opinion and not like "IT'S AWESOME THOR IS ROX!" but like "oh it's cool and all but the helmet looks a bit weird."
Or if you really do think it's flawless that's fine too.
redfirebird2008
02-10-2010, 10:02 AM
Its almost like they are DEPENDING on the sucess from the 1st one, which i understand but only to a certian extent, you have no idea when im around alot of people at work i say im wicked excited for iron man 2, and 90% of they say WOW they are making a part 2. That shouldnt happen 3 months before the release
I don't think there's too much to worry about. The first one was a big success. As long as they get the word out over the next 3 months, people will go see it in droves.
Son of Coul
02-10-2010, 10:04 AM
The Superbowl spot would've been perfect. I'm just wondering why they pulled it, they pretty much could've rehashed the trailer and had a perfectly fine reaction from the GA, along with much increased awareness.
Chewy
02-10-2010, 10:09 AM
They probably figured it wasn't worth the many million $$$ they would have spent on it. They could get many many many more TV spots closer to release for the same price.
Son of Coul
02-10-2010, 10:17 AM
Yeah that makes sense, they replaced it with the Shutter Island one, right? That comes out much sooner, and Paramount's got Last Airbender that needed the Superbowl for advertising more.
redfirebird2008
02-10-2010, 10:20 AM
I just noticed that the budget is allegedly $210 million. Hopefully they can use that to improve some of the CGI shots, particularly when Tony gets into and out of the suit. That part looked pretty fake.
What are your genuine thoughts on the costume? You don't have to describe it, but give your opinion and not like "IT'S AWESOME THOR IS ROX!" but like "oh it's cool and all but the helmet looks a bit weird."
Or if you really do think it's flawless that's fine too.
Well, it looks really cool. Different in some ways, but very cool to see in real life.
sabetoonth
02-10-2010, 11:54 AM
Well, it looks really cool. Different in some ways, but very cool to see in real life.
an u at least tell us if the classci helmet or a different helmet is being used?
Mr. Stark
02-10-2010, 12:14 PM
might be a re-post but anyone have any idea what those circut lines coming from the arc reactor on tonys chest are in the trailer? Im thinking maybe extremis, but its wayyy to soon for that and doesnt fit the feel of the film
protocida
02-10-2010, 12:44 PM
It's said to be a nanobiotechnological virus Hammer infects Stark with.
RealIrOnMaN
02-10-2010, 12:50 PM
I don't know if it's old, but here is photo of Bob Layton (Iron Man v1 Best Artist) and Justin Theroux (IM2 script wiz) from IM2 Set in Monaco:
http://timenerdworld.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/justin-theroux-and-bob.jpg
WindsofHorus
02-10-2010, 12:55 PM
That's a great picture, I've met Bob Layton a couple times, got him to sign some comics for me. He seems like a cool guy.
WindsofHorus
02-10-2010, 12:56 PM
double..
Mr. Stark
02-10-2010, 12:57 PM
It's said to be a nanobiotechnological virus Hammer infects Stark with.
interesting, i mean thats very interesting because in the comics no one was ever able to hack into tonys systems he always had failsafes, all i can remember is recently the skrulls, i find it kind of odd they would dumb down the charachter a bit like that
Mr. Stark
02-10-2010, 12:58 PM
It's said to be a nanobiotechnological virus Hammer infects Stark with.
interesting, i mean thats very interesting because in the comics no one was ever able tohack into tonys systems he always had failsafes, all i can remember is recently the skrulls, i find it kind of odd they would dumb down the charachter a bit like that
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.