View Full Version : The Official Thor News and Set Pics Thread
sabetoonth
06-13-2010, 11:24 PM
i see like some fold mail hainging off the head
louiebling$
06-14-2010, 01:30 AM
I'd prefer to see them relegate any metal to the credits, personally. Metal loves fantasy and mythology, and that's cool, but I think it'd come off corny in a big-budget film.
I would **** my pants if Dragonforce was in Thor :awesome::awesome::awesome:
Avengers-Report
06-14-2010, 01:30 AM
yea i would love if what ever footage does get screened at comic con leaks. But look at least few yrs some things leaked and others didnt.
I am pretty confident footage will be leaked.
Webhead2006
06-14-2010, 03:11 AM
we will just have to see what happens. Take for example last yr i believe im 2 stuff leaked, but jonah hex for dc i didnt recall see any of its footage leaking out.
The_Mighty_Thor
06-14-2010, 07:42 AM
any one thinkin what im thinkin in that second and rhen thords pic? is that person GREEN?
If your thinking that your post was incoherant then yes!
Those look like ice trolls to me.
Aesop Rocks
06-14-2010, 08:40 AM
:funny: :awesome:
Brian Braddock
06-14-2010, 10:58 AM
any one thinkin what im thinkin in that second and rhen thords pic? is that person GREEN?
Not green; close ups show that they are more of a light blue colour.
NickNitro
06-14-2010, 11:00 AM
Wondering why no one poster the Sif Set Pic here yet? HmMmMmMm maybe its in here already and I just missed it.
EDIT: Stupid me found em on the last page. Scrolled too fast I guess :doh:
Maybe they are in the Frost Giants laire???? and Sifs trying to save Thor who obviously seems to be captured.
stupid blurry photos how you ruin me :whatever:
Aeltri
06-14-2010, 11:46 AM
Wondering why no one poster the Sif Set Pic here yet? HmMmMmMm maybe its in here already and I just missed it.
EDIT: Stupid me found em on the last page. Scrolled too fast I guess :doh:
Maybe they are in the Frost Giants laire???? and Sifs trying to save Thor who obviously seems to be captured.
stupid blurry photos how you ruin me :whatever:
If that's the case then they're rather short for Frost 'Giants' :dry:. My guess is that they could be these guys:
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b362/aimelek/SMASK.jpg
Or some form of miscellaneous monster.
sabetoonth
06-14-2010, 12:34 PM
If your thinking that your post was incoherant then yes!
Those look like ice trolls to me.
i thought i saw like a guy in green with chain mail or other decorative cloth coming off the back of his head, in the corner to the left
:funny: :awesome:
oh you shush :o
If that's the case then they're rather short for Frost 'Giants' :dry:. My guess is that they could be these guys:
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b362/aimelek/SMASK.jpg
Or some form of miscellaneous monster.
and who are they?
Brian Braddock
06-14-2010, 01:30 PM
[QUOTE=Aeltri;18430121]If that's the case then they're rather short for Frost 'Giants' :dry:.
Maybe the budget decreed that they couldnt employ the CG required to do the giants justice and so the decision was reluctantly scale them down a bit. Granted, I think we all wanted to see a frost giant of Ymir's size in the movie but we have seen giants of smaller size in the comics-
http://marvel.wikia.com/File:Frost_Giants.jpg
It would explain the number of 'close-to-7-foot' actors that have been cast in the movie; they'll at least still be taller than Thor.
GhostPoet
06-14-2010, 01:34 PM
I couldn't be happier about Sif. She looks fantastic. I always prefer my warrior women to be armored up. :)
Still no helmet on thor...sigh...are they waiting to make it the big surprise I wonder...
TheCorpulent1
06-14-2010, 01:35 PM
Maybe the budget decreed that they couldnt employ the CG required to do the giants justice and so the decision was reluctantly scale them down a bit. Granted, I think we all wanted to see a frost giant of Ymir's size in the movie but we have seen giants of smaller size in the comics-
http://marvel.wikia.com/File:Frost_Giants.jpg
It would explain the number of 'close-to-7-foot' actors that have been cast in the movie; they'll at least still be taller than Thor.
Dude, those giants were still like 10 to 15 feet in the issue. Balder was jumping off of trees just to get himself high enough to strike at their heads.
I'd be a bit disappointed if we have human-sized 'giants' in the film. Just make them trolls or something. Then again, those are rough, unedited shots. They might be employing some of the same camera techniques that made the Hobbits appear tiny in Lord of the Rings or something.
GhostPoet
06-14-2010, 01:42 PM
Dude, those giants were still like 10 to 15 feet in the issue. Balder was jumping off of trees just to get himself high enough to strike at their heads.
I'd be a bit disappointed if we have human-sized 'giants' in the film. Just make them trolls or something. Then again, those are rough, unedited shots. They might be employing some of the same camera techniques that made the Hobbits appear tiny in Lord of the Rings or something.
They could be stand-ins for the CGI characters I suppose.
TheCorpulent1
06-14-2010, 01:44 PM
Do they cast people for that now? I thought CGI stand-ins were things like tennis balls on poles and such.
GhostPoet
06-14-2010, 01:52 PM
I know if the film requires extensive hand to hand type battles/interactions they will use stand ins to allow the CGI artists a much easier way to determine the correct animations. All though i'm not sure if they still wear the mo-cap suits or if they use basic costumes that look similiar to the creature they are protraying.
Aeltri
06-14-2010, 02:47 PM
i thought i saw like a guy in green with chain mail or other decorative cloth coming off the back of his head, in the corner to the left
oh you shush :o
and who are they?
'Faeries', specifically Dark Elves.
The_Mighty_Thor
06-14-2010, 04:00 PM
Do they cast people for that now? I thought CGI stand-ins were things like tennis balls on poles and such.
Sometimes when they are interecting with something a lot they will use an actor in a chromagreen suit.
They did that for District 9 if you watch the behind the scenes stuff.
S.A.A.D.
06-15-2010, 12:22 AM
Metal music should have no business being in a movie like Thor,it's not what his character or the other characters from his world are about. It would be highly out of place.
sabetoonth
06-15-2010, 12:26 AM
i notice the guy laying on the ground looks a lot like a blueish version of the rock troll heroclix i got recently from the HoT
Webhead2006
06-15-2010, 11:41 AM
yea sif looks pretty cool i cant wait to see a better quality image of her. As for those creatures i do wonder what they are, and if they are frost giants maybe they will be digitally altered to look bigger.
sabetoonth
06-15-2010, 11:53 AM
they may be rock trolls, cuz my HoT rock troll is red, otherwise no difference
Webhead2006
06-15-2010, 11:58 AM
maybe that.
strikezone89
06-16-2010, 10:49 AM
Probably been posted but here:
http://i49.tinypic.com/25a5gus.jpg
Webhead2006
06-16-2010, 08:50 PM
yea it was posted here and in First look thor ET thread. Heimdall looks great.
Spider-Vader
06-16-2010, 09:52 PM
I wonder how long this movie's gonna be?
Webhead2006
06-16-2010, 10:25 PM
i would bet anywhere between 2hrs to 2hrs-10mins.
marvel_freshman
06-19-2010, 11:05 PM
Costume Details for THOR's "Warriors Three"?
http://b.scorecardresearch.com/b?C1=8&C2=6035047&C3=445.9429&C4=ad20487b&C5=152136&C6=160tjp9049449o&C7=http%3A//**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/%3Fa%3D19258&C8=Costume%20Details%20for%20THOR%27s%20%22Warrior s%20Three%22%3F&C9=http%3A//**************.com/&C10=1280x800&rn=244182 About 3 months ago, before the first footage, the costumehttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif (http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=19258#) concept renderings, and the first official image, all we had were rumors, and One particular overlooked description of the costume (http://www.**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=16372) that would soon be donned by Chris Hemsworth (http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=19258#) as the son of Odin, for Marvel’s much anticipated “THOR” movie (http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=19258#).
The source, user ‘IndustryKiller’ from AICN, included in the rundown that Thor was “complete with cape, chain mail arms, and the circles going down the front of the torso”. Now having official material released, that description is clearly spot on. ‘IndustryKiller' sources his matrial by saying, "When you live in LA (stuff) just floats around. You have friends working on this or that or whatever. You don't have to be a mover and shaker to see stuff".
Well ‘IndustryKiller’, seemed very amenable in sharing everything (http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=19258#) he saw, with the other members of the site. With this too being overlooked, for three months. IndustryKiller gave somewhat of a description of the supporting actors in costume as Fandral, Hogun, and Volstagg, together the "Warriors Three".
On Joshua Dallas in costume as Fandral "the Dashing", ‘IndustryKiller’ says...
Fandral was dressed straight up Errol FLynn. A dark greenish blue, if I recall correctly, but it's some kind of blue hue color scheme. (Like Thor) he also has a cape and long sleeves. His hair is blonde like the comic and he also has the classic swashbuckler facial hair.
On Tadanobu Asano in costume as Hogun "the Grim"
Hogun (was) straight up Mongol, a dark blue (color scheme), whose armor has an almost samurai hint to it but there are no hanging cloths or leather like the comic. I didn't see a mongul helmet either as he had pulled back kind of samurai looking hair, nor does he have facial hair.
On Ray Stevensonhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif (http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=19258#) in costume as Volstagg "the Valiant"
Volstagg, is a taller Ray Stevenson complete with fake fat suit and long ginger hair and beard, he looks pretty awesome. His suit is a maroonish red and it looks a little more like armor than the other two.
Additionally, 'IndustryKiller' includes that "The costumes are fairly complex and detailed. (They're) a little less traditional to their individual backgrounds than the comic. The motif of (all the Asgardian) suits aren't going for any kind of ACTUAL viking realism but is very skewed into the realm of the comic book world it represents, almost sort of futuristic with an old world Norse flair. They are fairly over the top compared to say, the "realism" of the X-Men wearing leather jumpsuits. Then again, I guess I'm just a comic book fan like that. (Overall) They are as accurate a representation of the source material as we were ever going to get."
http://**************.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=19258
The Squirrel
06-19-2010, 11:20 PM
Sounds good to me. :up:
Webhead2006
06-19-2010, 11:45 PM
nice cant wait to see them soon.
Surfer
06-19-2010, 11:55 PM
Sounds awesome. Now we just need some pics.
Surfer
Chewy
06-19-2010, 11:56 PM
I think that was actually posted a while ago
louiebling$
06-20-2010, 02:45 AM
I think that was actually posted a while ago
Yea sounds really familiar
marvel_freshman
06-20-2010, 09:43 AM
The source posted it 3 months ago, when I first found that costume description for THOR. Some people did what I should have did, and looked for my post by the source. So maybe someone here did that before. But this is news to some people including me.
Flint Marko
06-20-2010, 05:40 PM
Another piece of concept art has been released:
http://www.**************.com/fansites/Poniverse/news/?a=19134
...and once again, thor is helmetless. Is anyone else a little bit worried? I keep hearing 'stop complaining, its confirmed' but I cant help but be a little bit concerned here. Looks to me that its not gonna be a prominent part of his costume at all, something he's only gonna wear on certain occasions.
Webhead2006
06-20-2010, 11:33 PM
i dont think we have anything to worry, they probably just want to hold off the helmet to comic con among other things like loki and the warriors 3 and all that. Why show everything now. when we have a yr to release.
Brian Braddock
06-21-2010, 06:17 AM
Another piece of concept art has been released:
http://www.**************.com/fansites/Poniverse/news/?a=19134
...and once again, thor is helmetless. Is anyone else a little bit worried? I keep hearing 'stop complaining, its confirmed' but I cant help but be a little bit concerned here. Looks to me that its not gonna be a prominent part of his costume at all, something he's only gonna wear on certain occasions.
I have no problem with that; I mean, I'm enough of a realist to expect that Hemsworth not going to be wearing it all the time as Thor surely doesnt wear his helmet 24/7 or anything. I dare say that Thor takes it off when he goes to the toilet, when he snuggles up to Sif in bed or when he's just chilling at home. :oldrazz:
I'm fine with the idea that he takes it off, say, when he enters a building. Much like a knight from medeival times. That much has a certain air of regality to it. There's also the distinct possiblity that it gets knocked off in combat. With it being live-action, unless the production gave the helmet a chin-strap [which would look ridiculous] its going to be damn hard to keep on, unlike in the comics were they have the luxury of drawing it atop of Thors head no matter what punishment he takes.
As far as I'm concerned, until proven otherwise, there have been reports of a helmet but Marvel, for whatever reason, are holding back on showing it because they seemingly want to make it a big reveal at some point.
TheCorpulent1
06-21-2010, 09:55 AM
It does seem odd that they wouldn't show the helmet in promotional art...
Webhead2006
06-21-2010, 10:08 AM
sure it could seem odd, but we still have a yr roughly to film's release they probably have a big huge promotional play in store.
Surfer
06-21-2010, 10:48 AM
Is it just me or does this new promotional art look like Thor's boots go higher up on his leg. I mean sure the picture is blurry, but it looks like his boots are covering his knee (more like the comics), rather then being just below the knee like the original concept art. Maybe it is just the angle.
Surfer
John Locke
06-21-2010, 11:43 AM
Maybe after Thor defeats Loki and is not longer banished from Asgard Odin gives him the helmet as a reward.
Sebastos
06-21-2010, 07:49 PM
It does seem odd that they wouldn't show the helmet in promotional art...
Agreed.
Aesop Rocks
06-21-2010, 08:01 PM
Maybe after Thor defeats Loki and is not longer banished from Asgard Odin gives him the helmet as a reward.
"Here's your reward for going into war, a helmet".
R_Hythlodeus
06-21-2010, 08:49 PM
"Here's your reward for going into war, a helmet".
sound like a reward in a D&D campaign:woot:
Vartha
06-21-2010, 09:07 PM
sound like a reward in a D&D campaign:woot:
lol yeah it does! "Where's my never emptied drynking horn?"
marvel_freshman
06-22-2010, 01:15 AM
THOR will have a helmet you guys. The same guy who gave those Warriors Three costumes said...
"It looks literally EXACTLY like the helmet in the comics"
Vartha
06-22-2010, 09:37 PM
Yeah we know, we're just wonder why we HAVEN'T seen the helmet yet.
Blitzkrieg Bop
06-22-2010, 09:44 PM
They're treating this helmet like Two-Face.
Webhead2006
06-22-2010, 11:45 PM
yea lol hopefully we will be happy with how it looks on screen once we do see it.
Brian Braddock
06-23-2010, 07:25 AM
Yeah we know, we're just wonder why we HAVEN'T seen the helmet yet.
That's just it though, some people seemingly dont know and are interpreting it's absence from the all too few actual images that we've seen of Thor as being proof of some kind of Oliver Stone-esque conspiracy theory about the helmet not being in the movie.
Maybe I've achieved some kind of zen-like mindset due to my advancing years or something, but all I can say to such people is that they simply need to chill.
Not everything has to be handed on a plate to them a full year before the movie comes out.
Webhead2006
06-23-2010, 10:56 AM
totally brian. We have only seen part of two scenes from the two ET footage. and one official promo photo. That wont dictate how the whole film's costume will be.
Vartha
06-23-2010, 11:19 AM
That's just it though, some people seemingly dont know and are interpreting it's absence from the all too few actual images that we've seen of Thor as being proof of some kind of Oliver Stone-esque conspiracy theory about the helmet not being in the movie.
Maybe I've achieved some kind of zen-like mindset due to my advancing years or something, but all I can say to such people is that they simply need to chill.
Not everything has to be handed on a plate to them a full year before the movie comes out.
Yeah I know, I'd think we would have seen the helmet at least on the concept art tho.
Brian Braddock
06-23-2010, 11:26 AM
Of course, now that I've submitted a post like that, just wait and see how the helmet's not in the movie and I end up looking like an absolute arse.
:D
Webhead2006
06-23-2010, 02:41 PM
well hopefully it will be in a good porition of the film.
sabetoonth
06-24-2010, 01:18 AM
to be honest, i could live without the helmet, almost maybe prefer no helmet
Chris Wallace
06-24-2010, 06:49 AM
It does seem odd that they wouldn't show the helmet in promotional art...
A bit.
CanaryFan
06-24-2010, 07:23 AM
to be honest, i could live without the helmet, almost maybe prefer no helmet
Honestly I think you're alone in that!
We saw Heimdall(at least I believe it is Heimdall) in the ET footage wearing a helmet very much like his comic book headgear, that at least indicates that helmets are a norm in Asgard. Given that indication why would Thor not also sport his classic helmet?
S.A.A.D.
06-24-2010, 09:51 AM
I'm gonna be very pissed off if they don't show Thor with his helmet on at SDCC.
TheCorpulent1
06-24-2010, 09:52 AM
While I hope you're right, I can't help playing devil's advocate here: Odin was also shown but he was not wearing a helmet. So who's to say that Heimdall's the norm and not just some wacky guy who happens to wear a helmet, drawing constant ridicule from his fellow, helmetless Asgardians? ;)
Webhead2006
06-24-2010, 10:27 AM
i really do hope we do get an image of the helmet soon to put an end to the will there or wont there be helmet stuff.
Moridin
06-24-2010, 07:15 PM
They're treating this helmet like Two-Face.
They're burning one side of the helmet?!!
*faints from nerd-rage*
irapogi
06-24-2010, 10:30 PM
They're burning one side of the helmet?!!
*faints from nerd-rage*
i know right?! burning instead of ACID like in the comics? they're disrespecting Thor's helmet!!! :doh:
... :awesome:
sabetoonth
06-24-2010, 11:04 PM
Honestly I think you're alone in that!
and im find with that its not like ima throw a fit if there is a helmet, but i really wouldnt miss it if it isnt there
Webhead2006
06-25-2010, 03:14 PM
hopefully like i said the other day we will get a shot soon of thor's helmet to squash this oh he isnt going to wear a helmet stuff lol.
MikeFrost
06-26-2010, 05:55 AM
i know right?! burning instead of ACID like in the comics? they're disrespecting Thor's helmet!!! :doh:
Ontop of that, the helmet is organic and not permawhite...
Shivsguy616
06-26-2010, 08:50 AM
Honestly I think you're alone in that!
I can comfirm that you are wrong.
Parker Wayne
06-26-2010, 10:48 AM
I don't know about that. You're the first one I heard who doesn't prefer the helment. This isn't an issue like Captain America's wings. Thor's helmet is actually importantt to him.
And there was confirmation that it will be in the movie, so I don't know why people are complaining that it won't be.
sabetoonth
06-26-2010, 02:18 PM
what i mean is if they dont use the helmet aot or at all it wont bug me, but if they hav the helmet it will be awesome
Avengers-Report
06-27-2010, 01:39 PM
They need the helmet, it is a symbol of the character. But at the same time I don't want the studio to force a dumb looking helmet into the movie just because fans are demanding for on. I hope that Thor just uses the helmet for the final battle or whatever, but want it to look good =)
Webhead2006
06-27-2010, 02:24 PM
we really need to stop this debate over the helmet i think. As its been pointed out he does have the helmet. We will just have to wait and see how much it is in the film itself.
Brian Braddock
06-27-2010, 02:25 PM
They need the helmet, it is a symbol of the character. But at the same time I don't want the studio to force a dumb looking helmet into the movie just because fans are demanding for on. I hope that Thor just uses the helmet for the final battle or whatever, but want it to look good =)
Devil's advocate - just what if that was the case? What if they tried to fabricate a helmet but no matter what they tried, it looked awful in live action?
x-fan
06-27-2010, 03:21 PM
http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/30239298/aview/1133752694104_casnormanhelmet3.jpg
Quick someone put white wings on this sucker and see if it was hard to do or looks bad, I can't do manips myself sorry.
The_Mighty_Thor
06-27-2010, 06:27 PM
Devil's advocate - just what if that was the case? What if they tried to fabricate a helmet but no matter what they tried, it looked awful in live action?
Then kenneth Branagh is a lousy film maker, and that's not the case.
sha1243
06-27-2010, 06:42 PM
Wow you guys are still talking about the helmet lol. The helmet is defiantly in this movie it might not be shown a lot though but it will be really stupid to give Heimdall a helmet but not Thor, just be patient they have to show the helmet sooner or later.
Maximillian
06-27-2010, 08:05 PM
it might not be shown a lot though
Wouldn't make any sense.
sha1243
06-27-2010, 08:35 PM
Wouldn't make any sense.
Well from the little stuff that we seen I am going to assume that he is not going to wear the helmet all the time.There's probably going to be two or three scene's in this movie where we see him wear his helmet. Now it makes perfect sense because in Asgard we might see him with the winged helmet for a little while then he gets banished to earth and that's probably going to be the main focus of the movie cause he's learning how to be human and learning how to be a hero then he finds his hammer and puts back on his costume it might be with the helmet or without the helmet. At the end of the movie we might see him with his helmet again.This is only my theory based on what was shown to us already. It just looks like base on the info that we know that there focus is not on the helmet.
Webhead2006
06-27-2010, 11:32 PM
yea i really want this debate over helmet to be done with, we know he has it from many many official reports/set reports and all that. So lets move to soemthing else.
spider-neil
06-28-2010, 01:15 AM
the 'confirmation' was that a helmet was MADE not confirmation that it was used. in spider-man, webshooters were made but never used. well, we'er definately going to find out on way or the other with comic con.
Blitzkrieg Bop
06-28-2010, 02:37 AM
They're burning one side of the helmet?!!
*faints from nerd-rage*
No, you just won't see it till the very end and then Thor throws it away. :awesome:
Brian Braddock
06-28-2010, 06:52 AM
Then kenneth Branagh is a lousy film maker, and that's not the case.
Branagh would be a lousy film maker if his production team couldnt convincingly translate Thor's helmet into live action? Sorry, but no way is way would that be correct.
Any hypothetical inability to translate, or decsion made to exclude, the helmet from the movie would be just one aspect of the whole production.
How can it be indicative of Branagh being a lousy filmaker?
The_Mighty_Thor
06-28-2010, 07:15 AM
How can it be indicative of Branagh being a lousy filmaker?
I believe your statement was what if they couldn't make it look good no matter what they tried. Given the number of viking and sword and sorcery flicks I've seen with great looking crazy helmets that would clearly be a colossal failure on the filmmakers part.
Brian Braddock
06-28-2010, 07:39 AM
Sure, you're correct, there have been multitudes of on-screen viking helmets over the years but I've a question for you:-
Just how many films have you seen with someone wearing a helmet exactly like the 616 helmet?
Only reason I'm asking this, and as I said previously I'm just playing Devils Advocate here, is that there may be a small possiblity that the helmet looks great on Thor as drawn on the printed page but a literal translation looks lousy in live action atop of an actors head.
Judge Holden
06-28-2010, 07:54 AM
I don't think the 616 helm would look great in live action. It just looks like a dome with wings stuck on the side.
Whereas the King Thor helm looks like the wings were designed as part of the whole helm if you know what i mean? They don't just look stuck on the side of it.
R_Hythlodeus
06-28-2010, 08:04 AM
we will see soon enough. helmet or no helmet, I really don't care. Thor isn't about helmets, you know?
Brian Braddock
06-28-2010, 08:07 AM
See that's what I'm saying, Judge H - I think we have to prepare ourselves for the possibility that the 616 helmet just may not translate well.
I mean, Kenneth’s a filmmaker not a magician. If they tried it [and by all accounts they have] and it just didn’t work, I’d say they are in a better position to come to that conclusion as opposed to people (myself included) who sit behind a computer and decree that something should be so because they've actually tired it. Theyve actually seen it. Theyve seen it on Hemworth and theyve screen tested it.
The Mighty Thor said that Branagh would be a lousy filmmaker if he couldn’t make the helmet work but I say that is a massive over-reaction. We all want to see the helmet but would we want to see it if it looked ridiculous atop of Hemsworth's head?
Judge Holden
06-28-2010, 10:48 AM
Exactly Bri.
I do believe the King Thor helm could work though. The wings are like designed into the helm as guards for the side of his face.
http://i871.photobucket.com/albums/ab274/woodenbear_bucket/MyFirstAlbum/Thor_Helmet_Costume.jpg
I remember on the Jonathan Ross show when Idris Elba was on there Ross whipped his one out and it looked pretty cool. And that was on Jonathan Ross... in one of his fruity suits!
marvel_freshman
06-28-2010, 11:37 AM
WOW! Everyone is still talking about this helmet crap. Gosh they need to release a new pic or something.
Brian Braddock
06-28-2010, 12:30 PM
It's the hot topic that everyone on the street is talking about. :D
Chewy
06-28-2010, 01:23 PM
BB I just noticed the quote in your sig and I can't stop laughing.
Brian Braddock
06-28-2010, 02:16 PM
Haha, Echostation made that comment on the Spider-Man new movie costume thread. Couldnt believe it when I saw it as it wasnt even a joke - Echostation was serious. :hehe:
I dont mean any malice in it, I just thought it was too damn funny to not have it as my sig.
Maximum Carnage
06-28-2010, 09:51 PM
Wow, Brian.....
Wow. It's all I can say....
The_Mighty_Thor
06-28-2010, 11:16 PM
OK, here it is! Your first offical look at Thor's helmet!
Can I get a drum roll please?
http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h71/m-col/Thor/thor-1.jpg
:awesome:
Webhead2006
06-29-2010, 12:10 AM
haha man
Webhead2006
06-29-2010, 12:11 AM
haha man
Vartha
06-29-2010, 12:44 AM
......what the heck?
spider-neil
06-29-2010, 03:02 AM
I'm not having it you can't make helmets look good on screen, judge dread's helmet looked good (for the little time he had it on :cmad: ) also brad pitt's helmet in troy also looked great as did eric bana's.
no excuses, no helmet = FAIL!
Brian Braddock
06-29-2010, 06:49 AM
World of difference - those helmets didnt have massive bird wing's on either side of them. ;)
I know the picture that the Mighty Thor posted above was in jest, but still. How's something like that going to mesh with the suit we've seen Hemsworth wearing?
The_Mighty_Thor
06-29-2010, 06:55 AM
Same way it does on the pages of the comic!
antmanx68
06-29-2010, 07:22 AM
If they made sure to give Heimdall and Loki helmets then I bet Thor will have one too, just frustrating that we haven't seen it yet with.
Brian Braddock
06-29-2010, 07:29 AM
Same way it does on the pages of the comic!
Do you really think that what works as an illustration on the printed page always works in the real world?
Seriously?
The_Mighty_Thor
06-29-2010, 08:07 AM
Always, no. In this case, yes!
The_Mighty_Thor
06-29-2010, 08:12 AM
Besides if it can look this good in plastic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rnTpR4M1ZI
imagine how good it can look in metal!
Vartha
06-29-2010, 08:33 AM
Well they HAVE made the classic Helm a Prop you can buy for few hundred bucks. Prob with THAT helm the wings are fiberglass or plastic white.
I really like Coipel's design. It's a cross between the Classic and Lord Thor Helms. If they keep his eyes visible it'd be great.
Brian Braddock
06-29-2010, 10:26 AM
If they go for the standard white feather look then I have my doubts about how good it will look in live action, but if the wings were metal, I think it would match up quite well with the movie suit.
Just been reading Thor#610 and the way that helmet looks, in both style and colourisation, would suit me just fine.
Webhead2006
06-29-2010, 11:51 AM
yea i doubt they would have the wings be actual feathers and it would be a printed design on metal helm. I really hope a darn image of the film's helmet is released soon so we can finally stop the whole helmet crap. I am getting a little sick of it all.
Vartha
06-29-2010, 09:08 PM
lol Well at least a few pics of the rest of the cast at least would do me just fine if we have to wait for the helmet.
Chewy
06-30-2010, 02:14 PM
Marvel's partnership with the fast food conglomerate Burger King isn't limited to toys based off of their film characters, though undoubtedly they are the most sought after. Kids, collectors and comic fans have been flocking to the popular restaurant chain to get their hands on any and all Marvel related merchandise for years, including toys based off of Marvel's Super Hero Squad and The Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon series. Marvel Studios' next live action film, THOR, will of course influence a new line of Kid's Meal toys; but which parts of the highly secretive movie will be represented?
Thanks to a member of the product development team, we now have a rundown of what toys will become available around the time the film hits theaters next summer. Here are the descriptions of the six items:
1) Mighty Thor Figure - The God of Thunder articulated in full costume with helm; Pose-able
2) Mjolnir "Lighting" Shooter - Thor's mystical hammer with the ability to shoot multiple "lighting" discs
3) Lady Sif Headdress - A miniature replica of the ceremonial helm worn by Sif in the film
4) "Rainbow" Ring - Unlock the secrets of the Bifrost Bridge, the gateway of the Gods of Asgard
5) Loki Figure - The God of Mischief casts a spell to "multiply" himself before your eyes
6) The Destroyer - Asgard's most powerful weapon, which only Thor may be able to stop; Pose-able
Unfortunately, since these toys are still in the prototype phase of production, they weren't detailed enough that images would do the final products justice. Fans who find themselves lacking the patience should be happy to note that the general public will get a good look at much of the THOR movie tie-in merchandise once the Iron Man 2 DVD/Blu-Ray is ready to hit store shelves.SOURCE (http://**************.com/fansites/Poniverse/news/?a=19610)
Canis Sapiens
06-30-2010, 03:38 PM
1) Mighty Thor Figure - The God of Thunder articulated in full costume with helm;
:awesome:
Webhead2006
06-30-2010, 04:37 PM
cool news about burger king toys, cant wait to see images of what they looked like.
Vartha
06-30-2010, 04:49 PM
Sweet!
Vartha
06-30-2010, 04:58 PM
the only Movie sets I completed from BK was the LotR glasses and figures.
Can't wait to try to get all these.
Spider-Vader
06-30-2010, 05:05 PM
I'd get glasses, no toys though. I'll save the toys for the Hasbro line.
Vartha
06-30-2010, 05:23 PM
Depends on what we see out of the BK line. I want that Mjlonir. lol
josh77
06-30-2010, 06:40 PM
Great news!
sabetoonth
06-30-2010, 07:06 PM
i cant wait to just see these
Gamma Burst
06-30-2010, 07:59 PM
I'll have the Mjolnir!
sabetoonth
06-30-2010, 08:05 PM
being able to lift it will be another story though huh? lol
Gamma Burst
06-30-2010, 08:13 PM
LOL Dude,If ''Rulk'' can lift Mjolnir, ( arghhhh,Jeph Loeb :barf:) there's no reason a nice guy like me couldn't hehe.
The_Mighty_Thor
06-30-2010, 08:22 PM
LOL Dude,If ''Rulk'' can lift Mjolnir, ( arghhhh,Jeph Loeb :barf:) there's no reason a nice guy like me couldn't hehe.
Rulk can not lift Mjolnir dam it! He can only lift Thor while he's holding Mjolnir:doh: It's what they call a Leobnicality:dry:
Gamma Burst
06-30-2010, 08:31 PM
Yeah,I tend to forget these Loebnicalities.They make me feel sick :/
sabetoonth
07-01-2010, 12:27 AM
Loebnicality? LAME!!!!! nott he name, but they fact they let this kind of farce exist
TheCorpulent1
07-01-2010, 12:08 PM
The Burger King toys sound cool. I doubt I'll get any of them, but it'll be fun to see them if I happen to go to a Burger King when the movie is released.
One minor nitpick: "the Bifrost Bridge"? Really? "Bifrost" is the name of "the rainbow bridge." :doh:
Vartha
07-01-2010, 07:25 PM
heh Rainbow ring sounds like a left over from Captain Planet. :D
spider-neil
07-03-2010, 12:32 AM
1) Mighty Thor Figure - The God of Thunder articulated in full costume with helm; Pose-able
phew!! :woot:
was worried for a time there.
Vartha
07-03-2010, 02:36 AM
What YOU Worry? hahaha
Thor wouldn't be Thor without a helmet. I think even people who know about Thor have at one time or other Seen him and recall Mjolnir, the winged Helmet and long blond hair.
Brian Braddock
07-03-2010, 04:18 AM
One minor nitpick: "the Bifrost Bridge"? Really? "Bifrost" is the name of "the rainbow bridge." :doh:
I think the key thing about that Corp is that these are for kids and kids sometimes need things to be simplified.
Dont you think its going to be easier for, say, a 6 year old to understand the concept if its established that its a bridge by the use of the word in its name, as opposed to just seeing this rainbow coloured thing called Bifrost?
Son of Coul
07-03-2010, 08:08 AM
And just saying "Rainbow Bridge" can turn off boys and many dads of boys.
"Pick a toy."
"Ooo I want the rainbow bridge!"
"THE HELL YOU DO! Give him the lightning shooter."
"But I already have-"
"GIVE HIM THE LIGHTNING SHOOTER."
Brian Braddock
07-03-2010, 08:40 AM
Ha ha; I guess it does have certain connotations.
TheCorpulent1
07-03-2010, 09:25 AM
And just saying "Rainbow Bridge" can turn off boys and many dads of boys.
"Pick a toy."
"Ooo I want the rainbow bridge!"
"THE HELL YOU DO! Give him the lightning shooter."
"But I already have-"
"GIVE HIM THE LIGHTNING SHOOTER."
I suppose if they're truly massive raging homophobes who've never heard a word of Norse mythology, yeah.
S.A.A.D.
07-03-2010, 09:58 AM
I don't get why people hate on people who aren't fans of the homo concept. There are things far worse than something as idiotic as the word homophobia, imo,it's nothing but an excuse for people to support the the homo way due to them being biased. People can be scared of anything they want,and these anti homophobic supporters are no better for supporting it.
TheCorpulent1
07-03-2010, 10:07 AM
Well, that's certainly one way to look at it. But this isn't the forum for discussing personal politics regarding sexuality, "homo" or any other kind. Just forget either of us said anything and let's get back to discussing Thor.
The_Mighty_Thor
07-03-2010, 11:05 AM
And just saying "Rainbow Bridge" can turn off boys and many dads of boys.
"Pick a toy."
"Ooo I want the rainbow bridge!"
"THE HELL YOU DO! Give him the lightning shooter."
"But I already have-"
"GIVE HIM THE LIGHTNING SHOOTER."
If that's the case I don't know if Lightning shooter would go over any better.
Carlo Comicus
07-03-2010, 12:09 PM
Confirmed: Kevin Pennington play a young Odin in "Thor" !!!
:P
TheCorpulent1
07-03-2010, 12:27 PM
Hmm. Did not know a young Odin would factor into the movie at all. I wonder how that works...
ddddeeee
07-03-2010, 01:57 PM
Creating the Midgardians probably, the first draft opens with a huge narrated explanation of Asgard, Odin etc. They'll likely use Hopkins for finding Loki I'm sure.
TheCorpulent1
07-03-2010, 02:19 PM
That would be cool. I hear they've changed a lot from the first draft, though.
Chewy
07-03-2010, 03:45 PM
I don't get why people hate on people who aren't fans of the homo concept. There are things far worse than something as idiotic as the word homophobia, imo,it's nothing but an excuse for people to support the the homo way due to them being biased. People can be scared of anything they want,and these anti homophobic supporters are no better for supporting it.
:dry:
Carlo Comicus
07-03-2010, 03:46 PM
Guys, I'm joking.:woot:
Carlo Comicus
07-03-2010, 03:48 PM
Guys, I'm joking.:woot:
TheCorpulent1
07-03-2010, 05:09 PM
:argh:
Parker Wayne
07-03-2010, 05:59 PM
I don't get why people hate on people who aren't fans of the homo concept. There are things far worse than something as idiotic as the word homophobia, imo,it's nothing but an excuse for people to support the the homo way due to them being biased. People can be scared of anything they want,and these anti homophobic supporters are no better for supporting it.
Not the time or place man :dry:
Anyway, is there any chance there will be an ounce of info that will be leaked before Comic Con?
Parker Wayne
07-03-2010, 06:08 PM
Double Post
Webhead2006
07-03-2010, 09:38 PM
lol carlo.
SpiderByte
07-03-2010, 10:07 PM
Seriously, Corp, you really shouldn't have fallen for that.
Spider-Vader
07-03-2010, 11:03 PM
I doubt we'll get any more leaks. So far the only leak has been Destroyer.
I'm 99% sure, Marvel purposely released the Cap & Thor pics.
Vartha
07-04-2010, 05:46 AM
The Thor pics were from Empire Magazine, they really weren't leaked.
MikeFrost
07-04-2010, 09:09 PM
Does anyone know how much the script has changed since the original?
I'm quite fond of the first draft, specially Loki's development...
Tony Stark
07-04-2010, 09:27 PM
The Burger King toys sound cool. I doubt I'll get any of them, but it'll be fun to see them if I happen to go to a Burger King when the movie is released.
One minor nitpick: "the Bifrost Bridge"? Really? "Bifrost" is the name of "the rainbow bridge." :doh:
It's been called Bifrost both in the comics and in mythology. I don't get your complaint.
Carlo Comicus
07-05-2010, 08:06 AM
Does anyone know how much the script has changed since the original?
I'm quite fond of the first draft, specially Loki's development...
I have heard the script got many changes from the first draft.
I'm looking for this, but i have found only the Cowboys & Aliens new draft.
ddddeeee
07-05-2010, 10:08 AM
It's been called Bifrost both in the comics and in mythology. I don't get your complaint.
Because calling it the 'Bifrost Bridge' is the same as saying the 'Mjolnir hammer'. The hammer is actually called Mjolnir so the hammer part is completely unneeded. Same applies here.
Shivsguy616
07-05-2010, 10:14 AM
I don't get why people hate on people who aren't fans of the homo concept. There are things far worse than something as idiotic as the word homophobia, imo,it's nothing but an excuse for people to support the the homo way due to them being biased. People can be scared of anything they want,and these anti homophobic supporters are no better for supporting it.
:doh: :hehe: :awesome:
Vartha
07-05-2010, 12:56 PM
It's been called Bifrost both in the comics and in mythology. I don't get your complaint.
I'm sure corpy meant to type RING in there somewhere. I KNOW he knows Bifrost is the bridge in comics and myth.
TheCorpulent1
07-06-2010, 12:53 PM
Because calling it the 'Bifrost Bridge' is the same as saying the 'Mjolnir hammer'. The hammer is actually called Mjolnir so the hammer part is completely unneeded. Same applies here.
Exactly. :up:
Saint
07-06-2010, 02:56 PM
I don't get why people hate on people who aren't fans of the homo concept. There are things far worse than something as idiotic as the word homophobia, imo,it's nothing but an excuse for people to support the the homo way due to them being biased. People can be scared of anything they want,and these anti homophobic supporters are no better for supporting it.
Wow. For your next trick are you going to defend racism?
S.A.A.D.
07-06-2010, 03:55 PM
No.
Saint
07-06-2010, 04:11 PM
No.
Ah, so you feel that fear and ignorance are only defensible when directed at homosexuals, then.
S.A.A.D.
07-06-2010, 08:04 PM
Ah, so you feel that fear and ignorance are only defensible when directed at homosexuals, then.
No,there is no point of going further into this discussion here since it's not the right place to do it and since even if it was that you wouldn't understand my two cents on the subject matter.
Aesop Rocks
07-06-2010, 08:22 PM
Ladies, ladies! calm down!~
Shivsguy616
07-06-2010, 08:30 PM
No,there is no point of going further into this discussion here since it's not the right place to do it and since even if it was that you wouldn't understand my two cents on the subject matter.
"No, I'm not going to explain my point of view, and even if I did you wouldn't understand it!"
Bravo! Great defence(!)
Shivsguy616
07-06-2010, 08:40 PM
Edit; double post. Apologies!
Chewy
07-06-2010, 08:45 PM
Bigotry and intolerance aren't exactly defensible points of view
Spider-Vader
07-06-2010, 10:01 PM
........How 'bout dat Thor?
Parker Wayne
07-06-2010, 10:09 PM
Bigotry and intolerance aren't exactly defensible points of view
I wouldn't really listen to S.A.A.D, guys. He is just further proof that 12 year olds shouldn't be posting on the internet.
Saint
07-07-2010, 01:16 AM
No,there is no point of going further into this discussion here since it's not the right place to do it and since even if it was that you wouldn't understand my two cents on the subject matter.
You already gave your two cents on the matter, and I understood it perfectly. Let's recap:
There are things far worse than something as idiotic as the word homophobia, imo,it's nothing but an excuse for people to support the the homo way due to them being biased.
Ignorance.
People can be scared of anything they want,
Fear.
Yes, I seem to have understood. Indeed, given the comments above, my capacity for understanding appears superior to your own. It is true, though, that it would be fruitless for you to continue this discussion, because your position is completely ridiculous.
Steve Holt
07-07-2010, 03:06 AM
is it me, or is this thread not about thor?
Aesop Rocks
07-07-2010, 03:10 AM
........how 'bout dat thor?
dat thor
Silvermoth
07-07-2010, 03:51 AM
I wouldn't really listen to S.A.A.D, guys. He is just further proof that 12 year olds shouldn't be posting on the internet.
Ha! I thought the same thing! Still, even for a 12 year old that's a pretty stupid thing to say.
Anyway, back to Thor. Do we have any idea who's composing for the film yet?
Brian Braddock
07-07-2010, 06:01 AM
Cant believe the rumpus on here surrounding 'homo's; after all, we're all homo's. Each and every one of us.
Homo Sapiens.
:oldrazz:
CanaryFan
07-07-2010, 07:18 AM
I can't believe some people are derailing one of the greatest threads on the hype with all this crap!
Ahura Mazda
07-07-2010, 07:57 AM
I do not come in here to read about people's personal issues but rather for news on Thor. Could we please get back to the point in question.
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 08:19 AM
Yes, please. Any further deviations regarding SAAD's comments will be met with infractions. We have other forums to discuss whatever personal views you may have on a broad range of subjects; this forum is for Thor.
Webhead2006
07-07-2010, 10:29 AM
Yea we need to get back to thor talks. Hopefully we will have more to talk about once comic con starts up in a few weeks.
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 10:31 AM
I was really psyched about this weekend because I thought SDCC was early in July. I damn near cried when I realized I'd have to wait another 2 weeks for it. :csad:
Son of Coul
07-07-2010, 10:45 AM
And we don't even know what day of Comic-Con it is, could be on the last day for all we know (though unlikely). Boy that's rough.
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 10:55 AM
Hopefully, the sheer quantity of stuff we get to see--not just for Thor, but for the myriad comic-related movies and shows and such coming up--will make up for it. I'm particularly looking forward to a full trailer (fingers crossed!) for Thor.
Son of Coul
07-07-2010, 10:56 AM
Me too, I'm hoping it'll leak a bit sooner than IM2's footage though.
Judge Holden
07-07-2010, 11:10 AM
So, do you guys reckon there will actually be footage of Thor at Comic-Con?
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 11:13 AM
I sure as hell hope so, otherwise this thread is gonna be pretty dead. :csad:
Judge Holden
07-07-2010, 11:17 AM
Yea :(
Let's will it to be true then! There will be footage at comic con... there will be footage at comic con... THERE WILL BE ****ING FOOTAGE AT COMIC CON!!!!!!
:thor:
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 11:19 AM
I don't know if the arcane forces of fate appreciate cursing, dude. :csad:
Judge Holden
07-07-2010, 11:30 AM
Damn... my passion got the better of me!
The_Mighty_Thor
07-07-2010, 11:45 AM
I don't know if the arcane forces of fate appreciate cursing, dude. :csad:
Then they should bring forth footage of Thor from comicon before the netherworlds are flooded with the sounds of a billion cursing tongues!:awesome:
Chewy
07-07-2010, 11:55 AM
The question here is how many days it'll take for a bootlegged version to leak. I'm going to go with 1.
ddddeeee
07-07-2010, 11:55 AM
I'm 100% sure Thor will have footage. If Iron Man 2 could and it began shooting 2 months after Thor then Thor should definitely have a trailer. :up:
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 12:04 PM
The question here is how many days it'll take for a bootlegged version to leak. I'm going to go with 1.
I'm kind of hoping the trailer, at least, won't be SDCC-exclusive. It seems like something they'd want to release to everyone. I could see extra footage or behind-the-scenes stuff being kept exclusive, but a full trailer? They'd be crazy not to let that out to all the fans who are anxiously awaiting anything from the film.
louiebling$
07-07-2010, 12:10 PM
I'm 100% sure Thor will have footage. If Iron Man 2 could and it began shooting 2 months after Thor then Thor should definitely have a trailer. :up:
Uhh Thor filmed Before IM2??? :huh:
You sir have your info mixed up
Chewy
07-07-2010, 12:22 PM
He is speaking relatively. The time between start of filming and comic con in the respective years
Keyser Soze
07-07-2010, 01:09 PM
I'm going to San Diego Comic Con. I won't have internet access until I get back to Scotland on Tuesday 27th July. But once I return I'll try to write up a detailed report of whatever footage they show for Thor and other relevant films.
TheCorpulent1
07-07-2010, 01:21 PM
I have a feeling most of the news sites will beat you to it by then, but I'll look forward to your opinions on it. :up:
S.A.A.D.
07-07-2010, 01:28 PM
I still have a bad feeling that no Thor footage will be unveiled at SDCC. And certainly with no helmet in sight.
Keyser Soze
07-07-2010, 01:55 PM
I have a feeling most of the news sites will beat you to it by then, but I'll look forward to your opinions on it. :up:
Yeah, I was late to the game last year too, with my Iron Man 2 report, but I tried to make up for it by going as in-depth as I could. I'll try to do the same this year...
Webhead2006
07-07-2010, 05:29 PM
yea we are bound to have footage at the con. as for it getting leaked, and if it is how long it will be online is the only question.
Webhead2006
07-07-2010, 05:29 PM
yea we are bound to have footage at the con. as for it getting leaked, and if it is how long it will be online is the only question.
Son of Coul
07-07-2010, 06:15 PM
I'm not even reading the descriptions, just gonna wait for the bootleg footage. I blew the IM2 footage by reading about it and while it was still very cool to see there weren't any surprises for me.
Spider-Vader
07-07-2010, 10:43 PM
I still have a bad feeling that no Thor footage will be unveiled at SDCC. And certainly with no helmet in sight.
Marvel's released new footage for their next movie ever since 2006 (I think) with Spidey 3. If not that then 2007 with Iron Man. They'd be foolish not to do it now, especially when they need to start marketing Thor like they did with IM.
I still have a bad feeling that no Thor footage will be unveiled at SDCC. And certainly with no helmet in sight.
I have a good feeling they'll show some footage. Don't they always show a teaser at the convention the year before the film is released?
If they do in fact show footage, i'd bet money that it will show Thor with his helmet in one of the last shots, somewhat of a money shot to get the fans going ape ****.
Even if they don't show the helmet i'll still be excited to see any type of footage.
Verbal21
07-08-2010, 12:23 AM
Exactly. With Thor being their next big release, it'd be pretty dumb NOT to show any footage to stir up more hype for this movie during SDCC.
TheCorpulent1
07-08-2010, 08:58 AM
Especially since Thor kind of needs the publicity, as opposed to Iron Man 2 or the Spider-Man movies. Thor is still an unknown quantity to a lot of potential viewers, so a big marketing campaign that starts relatively early makes sense for him.
Doctor Jones
07-08-2010, 09:39 AM
Thor will have footage. If not it is a huge mistake and Marvel knows it. They're gonna promote it like IM if they're smart, and they are.
Weadazoid
07-08-2010, 11:07 AM
Thor has been wrapped for quite some time at this point. They may even have a full fledged trailer for CC.
Webhead2006
07-08-2010, 11:43 AM
i really thought its been said there is a panel and we are due to see footage.
S.A.A.D.
07-08-2010, 01:13 PM
Man,reading the SDCC list makes me want to bash my head on the table. It's gonna be loaded with a bunch of lame stuff imo,with the exception of the Green Lantern movie stuff,too much time will be wasted in my mind. I feel so pissed off right now,no mention of Thor.
Man,reading the SDCC list makes me want to bash my head on the table. It's gonna be loaded with a bunch of lame stuff imo,with the exception of the Green Lantern movie stuff,too much time will be wasted in my mind. I feel so pissed off right now,no mention of Thor.
Not sure if you read a more in depth lineup but the one that the Hype posted on the front page I thought only had the first day's lineup. Out of that lineup the only thing that interested me was The Expendables sadly. Movie looks fun and badass but at SDCC I want more comic related films...that's what it used to be about I thought. Personally, I don't like how it got more mainstream in regards to showing stuff a whole lot of other films...like Twilight. :doh:
S.A.A.D.
07-08-2010, 02:12 PM
Not sure if you read a more in depth lineup but the one that the Hype posted on the front page I thought only had the first day's lineup. Out of that lineup the only thing that interested me was The Expendables sadly. Movie looks fun and badass but at SDCC I want more comic related films...that's what it used to be about I thought. Personally, I don't like how it got more mainstream in regards to showing stuff a whole lot of other films...like Twilight. :doh:
As much as I want to see Tron Legacy and Scott whatever,enough people know about them,why the hell do they get to hog up presentation time? And then there's the uber generic looking Red movie,big whoopdy doo dah. I'm still at the point where I barely even give a damn about the Expendables movie. What the,a Twilight movie was a part of SDCC once? :csad:
Crap,I had a bit more hope,until I reread what you said about the whole lineup list.
TheCorpulent1
07-08-2010, 02:17 PM
Well, despite the name, SDCC has gone way beyond comics to become a general geek haven for years now. Any and everything geeky (yes, including Twilight and its tween girl geeks) can get a spot there. I'm sure Thor will get his time, and Marvel as a whole will definitely have lots of panels and such. Shouldn't be a big deal.
As much as I want to see Tron Legacy and Scott whatever,enough people know about them,why the hell do they get to hog up presentation time? And then there's the uber generic looking Red movie,big whoopdy doo dah. I'm still at the point where I barely even give a damn about the Expendables movie. What the,a Twilight movie was a part of SDCC once? :csad:
Crap,I had a bit more hope,until I reread what you said about the whole lineup list.
I think a couple of years actually. The last one was when Cameron showed off about 20 minutes of Avatar footage to the crowd. I remember because a lot of fans were pissed, they had gone primarily to see that but the majority of people in the front of the line that filled up the auditorium were twilight fans...who stayed afterwards to watch the Avatar footage as a bonus. The ***** of the thing was that when interviewed, some of the Twilight fans were saying how much they loved the setup for Twilight and that they stayed for this "Avatar thing" just because. I remember a number of fans who were actually there and commenting on the hype got pissed when they heard that since they missed out.:hehe:
Corp, yeah I know over time it's become a show for all types of geeks but I still wish it would mainly stick to comics, sci-fi and fantasy. I can't wait to see the schedule for the rest of the days. I want to know when Thor and Green Lantern will have their presentation. The hype is going to be going down a lot during that time I think.
Judge Holden
07-08-2010, 02:38 PM
How does Red look generic? It's got Dame Helen Mirren with a pair of ****ing sub machine guns and John Malkovich running down the street screaming like a banshee with bombs strapped to him.
Generic? Not at all. Completely ****ing awesomely insane? Hell yes.
TheCorpulent1
07-08-2010, 03:41 PM
Corp, yeah I know over time it's become a show for all types of geeks but I still wish it would mainly stick to comics, sci-fi and fantasy. I can't wait to see the schedule for the rest of the days. I want to know when Thor and Green Lantern will have their presentation. The hype is going to be going down a lot during that time I think.
Yeesh, don't remind me. :csad:
Spider-Vader
07-08-2010, 06:03 PM
Hype lag will return in a week or two, w00t. :(
Microchip
07-08-2010, 07:31 PM
Thor will have footage. If not it is a huge mistake and Marvel knows it. They're gonna promote it like IM if they're smart, and they are.
No doubt. Even more so than with Iron Man. He's super cool in concept, a billionaire playboy in an armored suit. Thor, in concept, won't draw the general public. They need to show how awesome he is, because at the end of Iron Man 2 when my buddy was all "ok, a hammer, so the next bad guy uses a hammer?" and I told him it was Thor and described who he was, he was kinda :hehe:.
But I know it'll be a good movie, Marvel just needs to showcase it properly!
No doubt. Even more so than with Iron Man. He's super cool in concept, a billionaire playboy in an armored suit. Thor, in concept, won't draw the general public. They need to show how awesome he is, because at the end of Iron Man 2 when my buddy was all "ok, a hammer, so the next bad guy uses a hammer?" and I told him it was Thor and described who he was, he was kinda :hehe:.
But I know it'll be a good movie, Marvel just needs to showcase it properly!
People at first may be finding the idea of bringing a norse god into these movies silly but I guarantee you, a lot of them will change their opinion when he's swinging and smashing that ****ing hammer around. :awesome:
Webhead2006
07-08-2010, 08:57 PM
yea the total lineup isnt up yet right if i recall. and i believe marvel does have a thor panel why wouldnt they. they done it for ironman, hulk why wouldnt thor be there.
Wolvieboy17
07-09-2010, 03:24 AM
I have a good feeling they'll show some footage. Don't they always show a teaser at the convention the year before the film is released?
If they do in fact show footage, i'd bet money that it will show Thor with his helmet in one of the last shots, somewhat of a money shot to get the fans going ape ****.
Even if they don't show the helmet i'll still be excited to see any type of footage.
Lol sorry, I find this to be one of the most hilariously classic fanboy comments ever.
"I mean, I'd be excited for some Thor vision, but i'm only really invested in this fillum for the HELMET. Cha, why do you think i'm gonna see Cap, FOR THE STORY? HA! Its all about the wings, baby!"
Silvermoth
07-09-2010, 05:25 AM
I have a good feeling they'll show some footage. Don't they always show a teaser at the convention the year before the film is released?
If they do in fact show footage, i'd bet money that it will show Thor with his helmet in one of the last shots, somewhat of a money shot to get the fans going ape ****.
Even if they don't show the helmet i'll still be excited to see any type of footage.
Lol sorry, I find this to be one of the most hilariously classic fanboy comments ever.
"I mean, I'd be excited for some Thor vision, but i'm only really invested in this fillum for the HELMET. Cha, why do you think i'm gonna see Cap, FOR THE STORY? HA! Its all about the wings, baby!"
Lol, Actually that is kind of funny.
Ahura Mazda
07-09-2010, 09:31 AM
I just hope that the Thor showing in SDCC will be Friday or Saturday given it is not on Thursday. I unfortunately have to catch my plane Sunday morning.
Chewy
07-09-2010, 03:55 PM
From SDCC's Friday schedule:
11:15-12:15 Marvel Interactive: Marvel Video Games— Learn all about Spider-Man: Shattered Dimensions, Super Hero Squad Online, Marvel vs. Capcom 3, Thor and and other new games via exclusive trailers, surprise reveals, and Q&A with the game creators, as well as the Marvel writers working on the next wave of Marvel Games from some of the industry's top publishers. Room 6DE
TheCorpulent1
07-09-2010, 03:58 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot they were making a video game to tie into the film. Should be interesting to see that. I hope it's good, but experience has taught me that that hope will likely be in vain. Movie-based games traditionally suck, especially games based on Marvel's movies. :o
Chewy
07-09-2010, 04:02 PM
Spider-Man 2 was good :o
But yeah, 99% chance it'll be awful
TheCorpulent1
07-09-2010, 05:37 PM
The exception proves the rule. I don't actually know what that means, but I think it's appropriate here. :oldrazz:
Khemik@L
07-09-2010, 06:22 PM
Man,reading the SDCC list makes me want to bash my head on the table. It's gonna be loaded with a bunch of lame stuff imo,with the exception of the Green Lantern movie stuff,too much time will be wasted in my mind. I feel so pissed off right now,no mention of Thor.
Dude. If SDCC is anything like last year the Good stuff happens on the weekend. You will most likely see Thor stuff on Saturday.
Doc Ock
07-09-2010, 06:33 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot they were making a video game to tie into the film. Should be interesting to see that. I hope it's good, but experience has taught me that that hope will likely be in vain. Movie-based games traditionally suck, especially games based on Marvel's movies. :o
Maybe. I thought the Spider-Man games were great. The next-gen version of TIH was pretty good. Iron Man was....well....fun for 10 minutes. But yeah, it likely wont be good. X-Men Origins Wolverine Uncaged was a surprise though. But if the Thor game is being done by Sega.....I don't think it has a chance.
TheCorpulent1
07-09-2010, 06:39 PM
Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 were pretty good. The rest of the Marvel games, the best I can say is that some were just boring as opposed to actually terrible. Not that any other movie tie-in games are universally great, either. I shouldn't have singled out Marvel's specifically.
Spider-Vader
07-09-2010, 08:34 PM
The problem with movie games is that they don't have long to make the game. Usually a year or less. The Wolverine game was only good because Raven just happened to be working on a Wolverine game before the movie was announced.
Webhead2006
07-09-2010, 11:46 PM
yea tie in games are usually not that great. But cant wait to see what comes from thor at comic con.
Son of Coul
07-09-2010, 11:51 PM
If they're actually showing stuff from the game, you'd think they'd schedule the Thor movie panel beforehand, as not to reveal stuff from the movie in game form but rather, y'know, in the actual movie form.
Avengers-Report
07-09-2010, 11:59 PM
2 weeks until Comic-Con people. Time to see some Thor footage =)
Chewy
07-10-2010, 12:03 AM
If they're actually showing stuff from the game, you'd think they'd schedule the Thor movie panel beforehand, as not to reveal stuff from the movie in game form but rather, y'know, in the actual movie form.
They'll get the highest attendance on Saturday and more people = more buzz
Vartha
07-10-2010, 12:19 AM
Battle for Asgard wasn't all bad, and the main character can be used as Thor. Who knows? Thor might be ok
Sebastos
07-10-2010, 12:27 AM
2 weeks until Comic-Con people. Time to see some Thor footage =)
I really can't wait.
TheCorpulent1
07-10-2010, 10:56 AM
Battle for Asgard wasn't all bad, and the main character can be used as Thor. Who knows? Thor might be ok
Are you talking about that game Viking: Battle for Asgard? I tried playing it but I got bored like two hours in. It was just very repetitive to me, and the story wasn't really good enough to save it.
Gamma Burst
07-10-2010, 11:24 AM
So we're gonna get some Thor on saturday!
6:00-7:00 Marvel Studios: Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger— Producer Kevin Feige and special guests give you an inside look at the ever-expanding Marvel Cinematic Universe. Hall H
http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci10_prog_sat.php
TheCorpulent1
07-10-2010, 12:04 PM
Hmm, "special guests"? I wonder if those will include some of the actors, or maybe even Branagh himself. That would be sweet. :up:
cryptic name
07-10-2010, 02:42 PM
Hmm, "special guests"? I wonder if those will include some of the actors, or maybe even Branagh himself. That would be sweet. :up:
I'm pretty sure Branagh and Hemsworth are all but sure things for the panel. And hopefully Johnston and Evans will be on there for Cap since there probably won't be much if any footage.
TheCorpulent1
07-10-2010, 02:47 PM
Evans should make that panel pretty entertaining.
Vartha
07-10-2010, 03:01 PM
Are you talking about that game Viking: Battle for Asgard? I tried playing it but I got bored like two hours in. It was just very repetitive to me, and the story wasn't really good enough to save it.
I like games that you can actually EXPLORE the worlds. Yeah it can be repetitive, but, the look of the whole game was great to me.
Beowulf the movie game I'm still working on. Haven't played enough to judge, but I liked the look of it and for 5 bucks it's not bad. :woot:
TheCorpulent1
07-10-2010, 03:04 PM
Haha, for $5, few things are. :D
Thor337
07-10-2010, 03:49 PM
I'm a little disappointed, an hour isn't much time to cover two movies and show some good footage. I've never been to one of these panals, does this sound about right for a movie panal? Was Ironman and Ironman II 1/2 a hour each or were they longer. Anyway I'll have several windows open up at 7:00 on Saturday to see where the footage shows up first.
Son of Coul
07-10-2010, 03:55 PM
I think they were around a 1/2 hour each. I think Cap's could be a bit shorter since they're in the beginning stages of shooting the movie and all.
Doc Ock
07-10-2010, 03:56 PM
I think I will skip the Comic Con news on purpose so I can be more excited when I watch the trailer afterwards....at least, I hope there is a trailer.
Lol sorry, I find this to be one of the most hilariously classic fanboy comments ever.
"I mean, I'd be excited for some Thor vision, but i'm only really invested in this fillum for the HELMET. Cha, why do you think i'm gonna see Cap, FOR THE STORY? HA! Its all about the wings, baby!"
When the **** did I say I was only interested in the helmet???
I said I would be excited to see any footage but the helmet would be a nice bonus.
Webhead2006
07-10-2010, 09:11 PM
nice to have official confirmation of thor's comic con panel and it being on the saturday of comic con. cant wait to see/hear what happens in their panel.
Spider-Vader
07-10-2010, 09:16 PM
I don't see why Thor's helmet would be the money shot. I think a shot of Thor leaping towards a Frost Giant would be the money shot.
Doc Ock
07-10-2010, 09:18 PM
I honestly hope Thor doesn't have a helmet, i've never liked it in the comics. :O
Gamma Burst
07-10-2010, 09:54 PM
I don't see why Thor's helmet would be the money shot. I think a shot of Thor leaping towards a Frost Giant would be the money shot.
I second that.:up:
Wolvieboy17
07-11-2010, 04:31 AM
When the **** did I say I was only interested in the helmet???
I said I would be excited to see any footage but the helmet would be a nice bonus.
Lol, I know what you meant, it was just your wording that amused me. I was only poking fun holmes, s'all good! :P
cryptic name
07-11-2010, 11:37 AM
I'm a little disappointed, an hour isn't much time to cover two movies and show some good footage. I've never been to one of these panals, does this sound about right for a movie panal? Was Ironman and Ironman II 1/2 a hour each or were they longer. Anyway I'll have several windows open up at 7:00 on Saturday to see where the footage shows up first.
half an hour each is pretty standard, sometimes they do run long. also, while it's possible, i wouldn't get my hopes up too high about the footage popping up online right away. there will be a lot of detailed descriptions though.
Lol, I know what you meant, it was just your wording that amused me. I was only poking fun holmes, s'all good! :P
Ah I see. Sorry about that then.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.