PDA

View Full Version : The Official Thor News and Set Pics Thread


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41

lixdexia
09-27-2010, 08:03 PM
I was at Marvel.com where I saw their schedule for NYCC, but nothing on Thor, why not?
link?

Figs
09-27-2010, 08:38 PM
Wouldn't they already know that if they were fans? I don't think you'll see a big to do about that. Most comic book nerds are also gaming nerds, so they should be used to the notion of losing all your powers at the beginning of a story. :)

You have to remember that on the internet and thanks to Wikipedia, a lot of "fans" read up on whatever character is in the spotlight and act like they have been a long time fan.

Vartha
09-28-2010, 01:03 AM
Regardless of the film's quality; expect HUGE fan backlash because Thor wears civilian clothes and is powerless through most of the movie. The actual significance of how important (and accurate) to the character that is will be completely lost on them.
I wouldn't say there'd be a backlash, I mean sure Thor's powerless but he still has his battle experience which most of us Thor fans keep saying SHOULD count for something with or without powers.

RetroNaz
09-28-2010, 01:28 AM
It actually makes sense that Thor does wear human clothes anyway...it's all part of his humbling which I'm sure will make more sense when we see it on screen.

And I can just imagine how awesome the scene will be when he regains his powers and his costume. Epic.

Vartha
09-28-2010, 01:59 AM
I can't wait!
All we can do is Speculate with the news we DO have lol

JAKŪ
09-28-2010, 04:34 AM
Wouldn't they already know that if they were fans? I don't think you'll see a big to do about that. Most comic book nerds are also gaming nerds, so they should be used to the notion of losing all your powers at the beginning of a story. :)
When this movie was in the early stages the fans were asking that it take place completely in Asgard, and be an epic 'Lord Of The Rings' tale. I think those same fans will take issue with the whole 'Hercules in New York' thing we've got going now :oldrazz:

I don't care, fans are silly.

BizarroAids
09-28-2010, 04:55 AM
Anyone buy IM2 yet? I heard the Blu Ray had Thor and Cap footage. I'm not sure if the dvd comes with the footage. Anyway, just curious what footage for Thor we got.

Vartha
09-28-2010, 05:26 AM
RealIronMan said there was no footage of either that he's found, BUT there is something on the filming of the Mjolnir scenes by KENNETH and JMS is there too!

Vartha
09-28-2010, 05:28 AM
check post 8492

IM2 Blu-Ray: No Cap & Thor this time!
Quote:
Overall, the bonus materials are very, very impressive here this time around with the only real exception being BD-Live — which sadly was not included this time around; why I have no clue.

Vartha
09-28-2010, 05:30 AM
bumping for others

"Making of" "Thor's Hammer" scene at the end of "Iron Man 2" can be watched and downloaded from here (http://www.starkindustries.ru/news/fichuretka_o_semkakh_sceny_posle_titrov/2010-09-20-2009).

marcvader
09-28-2010, 07:28 AM
Is this Thor stuff on the DVD as well?

terry78
09-28-2010, 08:48 AM
They'll be saving the "real" Thor for Avengers more than likely. This is his semi-origin as a hero for Earth.

Vartha
09-28-2010, 01:49 PM
Is this Thor stuff on the DVD as well?
Not sure can't afford it yet Marc

Tony Stark
09-28-2010, 03:41 PM
I'm upset the BD-live stuff isn't there, but in there defense, alot of this is timing. The BD stuff was being put together right after the film was released in theaters. Meanwhile the Thor stuff was being scrambled to put together a pretty raw Comicon special viewing.

It's dissapointing they couldn't get it all together, but working in an industry myself where deadlines are keys and to make those deadlines you may have to drop one or two features, I can understand how this happens.

I'm not saying I'm happy with it, but bottom line you can't tell the stock holders, "oh yeah we had to delay the IM2 blue ray a month because we didn't have some of the featurettes ready."

Saint
09-28-2010, 05:41 PM
i'd rather it be at least mostly in battle. i think we've had enough heroes lifting things shots

I don't know, a good feat of strength can be great. I think one of the problems with both Hulk films was that neither really had that sort of moment. This is especially noteworthy in TIH, where the Hulk's strength was pretty tame. Superman lifting the island in Superman Returns was a fantastic moment, even if the rest of the film didn't meet that same standard, and characters like Hulk and Thor deserve sequences like that as well.

Naturally, it doesn't have to be as straightforward as "Thor lifts something really heavy." However, it does need to be something where the audience can understand the gravity of the situation. For example, when the Hulk resisted the soundwave weapon in TIH, that was supposed to show us the power of the Hulk--but it didn't really succeed because the audience has no understanding of how powerful that weapon is. There's no frame of reference.

Equally, if we show Thor resisting the eyebeams of the Destroyer, well that doesn't mean much to we who don't really understand the force of asgardian eyebeams. But if you show Thor demonstrating his strength on something that exists in the real world, something where we can imagine what the weight of it might be like, then you've got a much more effective demonstration of his power.

TheCorpulent1
09-28-2010, 05:49 PM
Well, they could also establish the power of the Destroyer by having it demolish some real stuff with ease. Then when Thor stands up to the same eyebeams that, say, vaporized a concrete bunker or a Hummer or something, it has more meaning.

Shivsguy616
09-28-2010, 06:13 PM
For example, when the Hulk resisted the soundwave weapon in TIH, that was supposed to show us the power of the Hulk--but it didn't really succeed because the audience has no understanding of how powerful that weapon is. There's no frame of reference.



Just before Hulk resisted it, we were given a frame of reference of how powerful the weapon was. We were shown it's effect on Blonsky.

Bren
09-28-2010, 06:20 PM
Just before Hulk resisted it, we were given a frame of reference of how powerful the weapon was. We were shown it's effect on Blonsky.

Which only showed that the Hulk was a bit stronger but a lot heavier than Blonsky... It did highlight he was stronger, yes, but not enough imo. In line with Corp, had the soundwaves demolished trees, or needed massive rear support for the hummers, then we'd get more of a feeling they were uber-powerful.

I knew they must be, because I know Hulk is. But that reasoning doesn't work when you don't know Hulk is powerful in the first place...

marcvader
09-28-2010, 06:22 PM
It was pretty effective for me.

TheCorpulent1
09-28-2010, 06:38 PM
Which only showed that the Hulk was a bit stronger but a lot heavier than Blonsky... It did highlight he was stronger, yes, but not enough imo. In line with Corp, had the soundwaves demolished trees, or needed massive rear support for the hummers, then we'd get more of a feeling they were uber-powerful.

I knew they must be, because I know Hulk is. But that reasoning doesn't work when you don't know Hulk is powerful in the first place...
Yeah, I think all of us are pretty poor judges for this because we all have a pretty good idea of how powerful characters are and judge everything else based on that, whereas this movie will be establishing how powerful the characters are for everyone else.

Gamma Burst
09-28-2010, 06:44 PM
Well, they could also establish the power of the Destroyer by having it demolish some real stuff with ease. Then when Thor stands up to the same eyebeams that, say, vaporized a concrete bunker or a Hummer or something, it has more meaning.

Agreed.The mere description(by Loki or Odin) of what the Destroyer can do or what He was created for could be pretty effective to give a hint to audience about his powers.

MultiPurposePon
09-28-2010, 07:03 PM
Which only showed that the Hulk was a bit stronger but a lot heavier than Blonsky... It did highlight he was stronger, yes, but not enough imo. In line with Corp, had the soundwaves demolished trees, or needed massive rear support for the hummers, then we'd get more of a feeling they were uber-powerful.

I knew they must be, because I know Hulk is. But that reasoning doesn't work when you don't know Hulk is powerful in the first place...

I disagree with you, but for a very different reason. The weapon they used in that scene was a tactical acoustic emitter (similar to the ADS - Active Denial System). It sends resonating, high intensity radio waves which cause only specific physical effects: loss of hearing, internal organ confusion and intense vertigo. Several of these systems can cause a feeling of intense "burning" to the epidermis, but it only lasts as long as you are in front of the weapon. The effects of being contaminated by this weapon are mostly psychological; meaning, once you encounter it you avoid it in the future (negative reinforcement). Being that it is simply emitting radio waves, there is no possible way for it to pick Blonsky up and throw him about. That being said, showing the "waves" causing physical displacement at whatever crossed it's firing path was the wrong way to go.

You can see some footage of how these weapons work here: http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/futureweapons-ads.html

Bren
09-28-2010, 07:09 PM
I disagree with you, but for a very different reason. The weapon they used in that scene was a tactical acoustic emitter (similar to the ADS - Active Denial System). It sends resonating, high intensity radio waves which cause only specific physical effects: loss of hearing, internal organ confusion and intense vertigo. The effects of being contaminated by this weapon are mostly psychological. Being that it is simply emitting radio waves, there is no possible way for it to pick Blonsky up and throw him about. That being said, showing the "waves" causing physical displacement at whatever crossed it's firing path was the wrong way to go.

You can see some footage of how these weapons work here: http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/futureweapons-ads.html

So in other words, the (fictitious) weapon they used in the movie was not a tactical acoustic emitter then, since it threw Blonsky and was very obviously causing Hulk to 'push' against it...

Besides which, you think the GA (and I'm including myself here) would know ANY of that? And furthermore, in discussion on how it was supposed to highlight or show Hulk's strength, your genuine TAE would have been even more useless in doing so.

MultiPurposePon
09-28-2010, 07:17 PM
So in other words, the (fictitious) weapon they used in the movie was not a tactical acoustic emitter then, since it threw Blonsky and was very obviously causing Hulk to 'push' against it...

Besides which, you think the GA (and I'm including myself here) would know ANY of that? And furthermore, in discussion on how it was supposed to highlight or show Hulk's strength, your genuine TAE would have been even more useless in doing so.


No need to be a smartass, I was agreeing with you.

Actually, it would have been more useful. But there's no way of actually showing a scale of physical damage caused by it because they are sound based weapons.There are plenty of futuresque weapons systems that could have been used in it's stead that would have displayed the type of damage you're mentioning.

And, for the record , the weapon used in TIH was by no means "fictitious." The schematics where borrowed directly from the US ARMY's Active Denial System; which you can learn about in the Special Features. So, yes, it was an acoustic emitter; the visual damage caused by it was simply exaggerated for the film.

http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k158/ponyboyzero/hulk4-1.jpg

Bren
09-28-2010, 07:26 PM
I disagree with you, but for a very different reason.

No need to be a smartass, I was agreeing with you.

Huh?

But I AM a smartass, you're denying me my right to be myself!!! ;)
Kidding, sorry for coming across off, I'm on another forum reading about current state-instituted racism, so I'm in a bad place...

They may have copied the designs of this Active Denial System, but the effects were not the same (artistic licence and all that), so it's not the same weapon.

So unless there is a system that does what the TIH thing did, then what we saw was fictitious. And no, I'm actually not a smartass so maybe there is, and I'm wrong. But it wasn't the ADS system ;)

Back on topic; if at some point Thor can throw a tantrum and crack a mountain in half, I'll be both happy and in full understanding of his strength :woot:

wobbly
09-28-2010, 07:36 PM
Bren, just before that sonic cannon scene we had the Hulk shrugging off bullets and grenades from Blonsky, ripping heavy army vehicles apart, etc. That the cannons did cause the Hulk to stop and feel pain (while Blonsky, who only caught the edge of the blast as he jumped and was thrown well away) and his overcoming them to smash them to bits, showed pretty well how strong he was supposed to be.

Saying he was "a bit stronger but a lot heavier than Blonsky" is understating the case big time (one kick, the only blow Hulk landed on Blonsky, shattered nearly every bone in his augmented body)

Gamma Burst
09-28-2010, 07:39 PM
Huh?

Back on topic; if at some point Thor can throw a tantrum and crack a mountain in half, I'll be both happy and in full understanding of his strength :woot:

I wouldn't complain about that:cwink:

xwolverine2
09-28-2010, 07:52 PM
Thor will be converted to 3d...
:(

wobbly
09-28-2010, 08:02 PM
Thor will be converted to 3d...
:(

For the most part yes. The effects heavy stuff (CGI) will be done in proper 3D, so it won't be as weak as 'Clash of the Titans'.

Bren
09-28-2010, 08:04 PM
Bren, just before that sonic cannon scene we had the Hulk shrugging off bullets and grenades from Blonsky, ripping heavy army vehicles apart, etc. That the cannons did cause the Hulk to stop and feel pain (while Blonsky, who only caught the edge of the blast as he jumped and was thrown well away) and his overcoming them to smash them to bits, showed pretty well how strong he was supposed to be.

Saying he was "a bit stronger but a lot heavier than Blonsky" is understating the case big time (one kick, the only blow Hulk landed on Blonsky, shattered nearly every bone in his augmented body)

I was referring specifically to the fact that these things were creating a physical force, and in that kind of situation, strength isn't the main factor, it's more about mass and grip I guess. But I'm definitely overanalyzing now. You're right regarding the other weaponry and carnage showing the cannons to be powerful, I forgot about that (oops)!

Still, I wouldn't have minded Hulk knocking a building over, and then in Avengers Thor standing up to the same blow :woot:

Saint
09-28-2010, 08:06 PM
Well, they could also establish the power of the Destroyer by having it demolish some real stuff with ease. Then when Thor stands up to the same eyebeams that, say, vaporized a concrete bunker or a Hummer or something, it has more meaning.
Yes, but I still find this less impactful than Thor tackling something that has known physical properties. In this respect, the eyebeams will never be a very good solution for a feat of strength. Now, if the Destroyer were to physically smash something with it's hands, and then Thor were to overpower it, that would be more useful (though still not the equal of Thor performing such a feat on something more real).

Just before Hulk resisted it, we were given a frame of reference of how powerful the weapon was. We were shown it's effect on Blonsky.
Yes, but we already knew that the Hulk is bigger, heavier, and stronger than Blonksy, so it a particularly meaningful frame of reference--especially since Blonsky's own power, being fictionally enhanced, is as much an unknown as the Hulk's or the weapon itself. We learned that Blonksy < Sound Weapon < Hulk, but this doesn't give us any understanding of the Hulk's strength--just that's it's greater than these other fictional things.

Does that make sense? When Superman lifted the island in Superman Returns, obviously none of us could guess at it's weight, but it would still have a more visceral reaction for us as a feat of strength, as it's easier for us to understand it's weight than the power of some sound weapon or super soldier.

Danalys
09-29-2010, 01:51 AM
the hulks first appearance throwing the forklift easily and that other big thing, aswell as easily swinging a wrecking ball at the end show strength. they make a point of it with blonsky talking about and enamoured with the hulks power. the other parts show endurance. i think the sonic cannons may have pushed back some humvees at some point aswell.

MoPlaYa
09-29-2010, 02:20 AM
When are we gonna get a trailer?

NickNitro
09-29-2010, 09:54 AM
I STILL dont understand something here. Please someone shed light as Ive been watching this forum as well as caps since we first got news of the casting and whatnot.

Bootleg stuff. Now on SHH's main page they post "leaked" images of Cap/Thor but we are not suppose to post or ask about bootlegged info on the forums?

Im still completely confused as what constitutes GOOD LEAKED and BAD LEAKED. Obviously Marvel/Disney did not constitute the distribution of its recent Cap set photos as well as Thors but they are on SHH and other websites...so arent literally ALL photographs not distributed from the direct source (Marvel/Disney/DC/whoever) bad?

Still confuses me. Sorry to be a buzz kill guys.

Crimson King
09-29-2010, 09:59 AM
I think the policy means "don't post what will get us in trouble."

Son of Coul
09-29-2010, 11:25 AM
I think since Marvel's not asking for the Cap pics to be pulled down, that makes them okay? I dunno, it's a thin line.

wobbly
09-29-2010, 11:36 AM
I STILL dont understand something here. Please someone shed light as Ive been watching this forum as well as caps since we first got news of the casting and whatnot.

Bootleg stuff. Now on SHH's main page they post "leaked" images of Cap/Thor but we are not suppose to post or ask about bootlegged info on the forums?

Im still completely confused as what constitutes GOOD LEAKED and BAD LEAKED. Obviously Marvel/Disney did not constitute the distribution of its recent Cap set photos as well as Thors but they are on SHH and other websites...so arent literally ALL photographs not distributed from the direct source (Marvel/Disney/DC/whoever) bad?

Still confuses me. Sorry to be a buzz kill guys.


Here is the difference:
Bootleg (or 'bad leaked') copies made from footage of the film itself, or screencaps taken from that, is prohibited as that footage is the property of Marvel Studios. As they do not want it available to the public at this time these boards have to comply.

Photographs and videos taken by the public of the set and the actors ('good leaked') are not the property of Marvel, so they cannot complain if they are posted here.

TheCorpulent1
09-29-2010, 02:15 PM
If it's on the front page of the Hype, it's obviously not bootlegged by our standards. Pretty simple.

Avengers-Report
09-29-2010, 02:34 PM
Thor will be converted to 3d...
:(

Ughhhh

NickNitro
09-29-2010, 02:59 PM
@Corp I completely understand that if its on the front page of SHH its not "bootleg"

My question was how is it determined some leaked information IS and some leaked information ISNT "bootleg", because I feel like its a very fine line and I just want to make sure I or anyone else here never steps over it :)

@Wobbly thanks for the clarity I appreciate it. Helps a little :D

@XWolverine2 How do we know itll be converted? If so 2D version HERE I COME!

TheCorpulent1
09-29-2010, 03:04 PM
If the company officially releases it or it's on the SHH front page, it's not bootleg. If it's a shaky cell phone movie or a blurry photo of random stuff on the set, it probably is. If you've got something to post and you're still confused, feel free to PM me.

scatterax
09-29-2010, 03:04 PM
Today I learned allot about bootleg. except what boots and legs have to do with anything?

Vartha
09-29-2010, 04:16 PM
If the company officially releases it or it's on the SHH front page, it's not bootleg. If it's a shaky cell phone movie or a blurry photo of random stuff on the set, it probably is. If you've got something to post and you're still confused, feel free to PM me.
I have to add, things like the SDCC footage of Thor. Even tho it IS the real deal, it has NOT been released to the general public and is still falls under that bootleg policy, meaning no screen captures from the footage are to be posted.

Still A ThorFan
09-29-2010, 08:07 PM
I STILL dont understand something here. Please someone shed light as Ive been watching this forum as well as caps since we first got news of the casting and whatnot.

Bootleg stuff. Now on SHH's main page they post "leaked" images of Cap/Thor but we are not suppose to post or ask about bootlegged info on the forums?

Im still completely confused as what constitutes GOOD LEAKED and BAD LEAKED. Obviously Marvel/Disney did not constitute the distribution of its recent Cap set photos as well as Thors but they are on SHH and other websites...so arent literally ALL photographs not distributed from the direct source (Marvel/Disney/DC/whoever) bad?

Still confuses me. Sorry to be a buzz kill guys.

Well, I have something that many people want regarding our beloved Thunder God and friends, PM me and I'll point the way.

NickNitro
09-30-2010, 10:54 AM
@ Vartha it was that that completely threw me off. Footage WAS showed to the general public even though they were SDCC members still they are considered the general public because obviously we all can buy tickets and go to it. So that footage is considered bootleg if shown outside of SDCC while set photos which I assume no one affiliated with the film said "oh sure take these set photos and post them online" are considered ok.

@Corp Thanks Corp but no I dont have anything that I was wondering about I was just generally confused on the subject haha and figured "hey since there is no new Thor news why not bring it up :D"

I wish I went to SDCC so I could be considered someone not of the "general public" haha

Vartha
09-30-2010, 02:12 PM
@ Vartha it was that that completely threw me off. Footage WAS showed to the general public even though they were SDCC members still they are considered the general public because obviously we all can buy tickets and go to it. So that footage is considered bootleg if shown outside of SDCC while set photos which I assume no one affiliated with the film said "oh sure take these set photos and post them online" are considered ok.

@Corp Thanks Corp but no I dont have anything that I was wondering about I was just generally confused on the subject haha and figured "hey since there is no new Thor news why not bring it up :D"

I wish I went to SDCC so I could be considered someone not of the "general public" haha
I watched it on-line live with a few hype posters at the Comic Con site. :D
Those at SDCC saw it twice, I was reading a live Blog at the same time and had problems along with a few of us watching the Marvel panel and missed the 1st showing and saw PART of the Cap footage and then saw the 2nd showing of Thor.
See for SOME reason they would allow the sound, but no images from the footage. It's all up to the company what they want released. They apparently do not want the Thor or Cap footage (which at the time was DAYS old) shown.
Thor just hasn't had alot of set related images since it was in sound stages and CGI. Heck they even built their own town and still not many pics were allowed to be shown.

Right now I'd be happy with Concept art on the web site. :csad:

RealIrOnMaN
09-30-2010, 02:58 PM
http://i.annihil.us/u/prod/marvel/i/content/st/14200header_banner5874886.jpg (http://marvel.com/news/moviestories.14200.essential_thor~colon~_walter_si monson_pt~dot~_1)
I will post it here, because THIS MAN totally deserves it (Omnibus will be released in March). I will not even try to explain how awesome mr. Simonson is, because all of you probably know this. But if you don't know a thing about him, than you should really read this guide!

I hope this will somehow heat up the hype, that we all have been missing for some time.

Vartha
09-30-2010, 03:37 PM
I can't wait to see more of the recolor in the omnibus. I'll read it at Barnes and Noble for now. lol
http://i.annihil.us/u/prod/marvel/i/content/st/14200header_banner5874886.jpg (http://marvel.com/news/moviestories.14200.essential_thor%7Ecolon%7E_walte r_simonson_pt%7Edot%7E_1)
I will post it here, because THIS MAN totally deserves it (Omnibus will be released in March). I will not even try to explain how awesome mr. Simonson is, because all of you probably know this. But if you don't know a thing about him, than you should really read this guide!

I hope this will somehow heat up the hype, that we all have been missing for some time.

Spider-Vader
10-01-2010, 05:52 PM
It wouldn't mind Bill in the sequel. But I think they should introduce the Greek gods before they introduce him.

TheCorpulent1
10-01-2010, 05:55 PM
It'd certainly be a lot easier to introduce the Olympians before a talking, horse-headed alien. ;)

MOVIELORD101
10-01-2010, 08:39 PM
http://i.annihil.us/u/prod/marvel/i/content/st/14200header_banner5874886.jpg (http://marvel.com/news/moviestories.14200.essential_thor~colon~_walter_si monson_pt~dot~_1)
I will post it here, because THIS MAN totally deserves it (Omnibus will be released in March). I will not even try to explain how awesome mr. Simonson is, because all of you probably know this. But if you don't know a thing about him, than you should really read this guide!

I hope this will somehow heat up the hype, that we all have been missing for some time.

Beta Ray Bill? Lame.:hehe:

Gamma Burst
10-01-2010, 10:12 PM
Beta Ray Bill? Lame.:hehe:

The name,maybe.
The charcter,not at all.:word:

Figs
10-02-2010, 01:24 AM
Are most Omnibus's in color or black and white? There is one coming out for the original Thor comics and I'm not sure if I want to get it if it's in black and white. I figure now that i'm older and have more money as opposed to when I started collecting comics in grade school I might branch out and read material for other characters.

RealIrOnMaN
10-02-2010, 03:47 AM
Are most Omnibus's in color or black and white?

There is one coming out for the original Thor comics and I'm not sure if I want to get it if it's in black and white. I figure now that i'm older and have more money as opposed to when I started collecting comics in grade school I might branch out and read material for other characters.

1) Yes, they are always in color.

2) Walter Simonson's Thor Omnibus will be in brand new color. It's worth it. One of the best Thor writers ever!

misjuevos
10-02-2010, 07:18 AM
on the iron man 2 blu ray disc 2 i found a neat little easter egg of the easter egg from the film. it is after the credits of the ultimate making of iron man 2, just like the scene is after the credits of the movie. shows the filming of the mjolnir scene from iron man 2 on the thor set. kenneth branagh talks about thor, and we see jms there too. jms talks about the scene and it even shows him trying to lift mjolnir. i guess it will be his cameo in the thor movie.

you have to select play all or it wont appear. under ultimate making of iron man 2 on disc 2 select play all and you can either watch the whole thing and wait till after the credits for it or just skip to chapter 6 to watch it.

Vartha
10-02-2010, 07:39 AM
on the iron man 2 blu ray disc 2 i found a neat little easter egg of the easter egg from the film. it is after the credits of the ultimate making of iron man 2, just like the scene is after the credits of the movie. shows the filming of the mjolnir scene from iron man 2 on the thor set. kenneth branagh talks about thor, and we see jms there too. jms talks about the scene and it even shows him trying to lift mjolnir. i guess it will be his cameo in the thor movie.

you have to select play all or it wont appear. under ultimate making of iron man 2 on disc 2 select play all and you can either watch the whole thing and wait till after the credits for it or just skip to chapter 6 to watch it.
Saw it, and I don't even have the dvd yet. :woot:

Still A ThorFan
10-02-2010, 08:47 AM
Is Marvel going to have a Thor movie panel or not? The convention is next week and nothing.

TheCorpulent1
10-02-2010, 10:33 AM
The name,maybe.
The charcter,not at all.:word:
The name isn't lame, either. :argh:

misjuevos
10-02-2010, 11:34 AM
I would love to see beta Ray bill in the next Thor movie. Really opens Thor up to the rest of the universe. First you think Thor is just magic and fantasy then you realize he is also sci-fi.

TheCorpulent1
10-02-2010, 11:43 AM
Well, they seem to be intent on telling audiences that Thor is a little bit sci fi in this first movie, too.

misjuevos
10-02-2010, 12:27 PM
Anyone see the picture of the cosmos in iron man 2's bts? Was that asgards galaxy?

S.A.A.D.
10-02-2010, 01:15 PM
I would love to see a movie version of Beta Ray Bill down the road.

Chewy
10-02-2010, 04:23 PM
Beta Ray Bill will never grace the big screen :csad:

Vartha
10-02-2010, 04:27 PM
I would love to see a movie version of Beta Ray Bill down the road.
I would too in many ways. That whole story is screen worthy.

RealIrOnMaN
10-02-2010, 05:42 PM
I've got some greeeaaaaat THOR news for you all Thor fans. It's not THAT big (no trailers or any kind of footage), but I assume you, that it's going to be awesome, once I will reveal it

Stay tuned, dear marvelites...

Figs
10-02-2010, 05:43 PM
I've got some greeeaaaaat THOR news for you all Thor fans. It's not THAT big (no trailers or any kind of footage), but I assume you, that it's going to be awesome, once I will reveal it

Stay tuned, dear marvelites...

I swear to the Norse Gods you better not be messing with us. :woot:

RealIrOnMaN
10-02-2010, 05:46 PM
I swear to the Norse Gods you better not be messing with us. :woot:
I mess ye not, noble Figs.

Figs
10-02-2010, 06:03 PM
I mess ye not, noble Figs.

:woot:

I'm so curious right now. Do you have an idea of when you can let the information out?

RealIrOnMaN
10-02-2010, 06:15 PM
Sooner, than you all think.

Figs
10-02-2010, 06:19 PM
By "any kind of footage", I take it you mean actual scenes playing out? I have a feeling and i'm hoping it's a pic of Thor with helmet on.

Gamma Burst
10-02-2010, 06:25 PM
Sooner, than you all think.

C'mon!Give us a hint:woot:

Gamma Burst
10-02-2010, 06:28 PM
The name isn't lame, either. :argh:

I know,mate!I said 'maybe':cwink:

Vartha
10-02-2010, 06:45 PM
Sooner, than you all think.
lol tease! Come on man! lol

Crimson King
10-02-2010, 07:00 PM
I hope this doesn't turn out like the Namor tease :/

RealIrOnMaN
10-02-2010, 07:01 PM
Here we go, ladies and gentlemen: http://spidermedia.ru/node/2965

Enjoy. #257 will be released in November!

MultiPurposePon
10-02-2010, 07:06 PM
Here we go, ladies and gentlemen: http://spidermedia.ru/node/2965

Enjoy. #257 will be released in November!

Seen it here yesterday http://www.greatmagazines.co.uk/store/displaystore.asp?sid=3561

Won't open larger yet.

Crimson King
10-02-2010, 07:06 PM
Sweet! He looks awesome!

Figs
10-02-2010, 07:23 PM
Nice! No helmet but still a damn cool looking pic.

JP
10-02-2010, 07:26 PM
Sweet! :up:

lixdexia
10-02-2010, 07:35 PM
cool cover, thanks for posting it

Gamma Burst
10-02-2010, 07:51 PM
Looks awesome!Can't wait for a bigger pic;)

TheCorpulent1
10-02-2010, 10:29 PM
Looks good. I really want to see a bigger version, though.

Sebastos
10-02-2010, 10:32 PM
Awesome cover.

Vartha
10-02-2010, 10:57 PM
can't wait for a larger one

Superhero 101
10-03-2010, 12:24 AM
Nice can't wait

misjuevos
10-03-2010, 12:45 AM
cool at least he has mjolnir in hand.

xwolverine2
10-03-2010, 03:04 AM
@XWolverine2 How do we know itll be converted? If so 2D version HERE I COME!

im sure it was prob officially said somewhere... but i found out on a 2d-to-3d converting company's site. damn shame

Vartha
10-03-2010, 03:23 AM
im sure it was prob officially said somewhere... but i found out on a 2d-to-3d converting company's site. damn shame
Yes a couple times not to mention When we were watching the SDCC Marvel panel live feed there was also a live blogger. They said "put on your glasses to view the footage". The blogger loved the 3-D.

ALSO Kenneth has said in a couple interviews that they are making it 2D INTO 3D because the 3D cameras were too stationary for Action sequences, and one other time he said they were still doing the 3D conversion.

Kane52630
10-03-2010, 03:33 AM
yeah it saddens me that people are still doing the conversions to 3D

heres a (almost) complete list of all the fake 3D (the ones that uses conversions) and the real 3D (the ones that used the actual 3D cameras and/or computer animated 3D )

http://realorfake3d.com/

ddddeeee
10-03-2010, 05:28 AM
Great pic.

Anyone notice how in some pics Thor's cape has the Kirby bump and looks like fabric but in others there's no bump and it looks more plastic?

Still A ThorFan
10-03-2010, 09:43 AM
The last time EMPIRE spoke about Thor it was said how the film wouldn't work, and the author made fun of the whole idea.

So I guess no Thor footage at NYCC?

RealIrOnMaN
10-03-2010, 09:53 AM
So I guess no Thor footage at NYCC?
Yes. Marvel will show only several episodes from their brand new animated show - The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes, but no Cap or Thor movie news this time.

Aesop Rocks
10-03-2010, 09:55 AM
lol NYCC never gets anything good.

RealIrOnMaN
10-03-2010, 10:53 AM
lol NYCC never gets anything good.
I wouldn't say so in terms of comic book related news. Marvel always has some good comic stuff to show in this kind of conventions each year + there will be a Marvel Video Game panel, which means, that there is a possibility of seeing the second trailer for Thor: The Video Game and maybe, just maybe, some teaser of The First Avenger: Captain America - The Video Game.

Here is the official announcement from Marvel:
Saturday, October 9: 10:45 p.m. - 11:45 p.m., MARVEL VIDEO GAMES

Join us as we preview never-before-seen game videos, trailers, surprise reveals and more from the "Thor", "Captain America", "Spider-Man: Shattered Dimensions", "The Super Hero Squad: The Infinity Gauntlet" video games, the "Super Hero Squad MMO" and Marvel vs. Capcom 3; followed by Q & A with talent from some of the industry's top publishers working on the next of wave Marvel Games.

Room 1A06

But, yes, I agree, that the whole "no comic book movies news for you this time" thing on such conventions is a bad thing indeed.

echostation
10-03-2010, 11:48 AM
so does that mean that both films are in trouble... ie Thor has a huge chance of sucking?

lixdexia
10-03-2010, 11:50 AM
no, it just means that they don't care about the east coast :(

TheCorpulent1
10-03-2010, 12:04 PM
Great pic.

Anyone notice how in some pics Thor's cape has the Kirby bump and looks like fabric but in others there's no bump and it looks more plastic?
I thought it always had the Kirby swoop and looked like fabric. I don't recall any actual photographs where it didn't.

Gamma Burst
10-03-2010, 12:37 PM
so does that mean that both films are in trouble... ie Thor has a huge chance of sucking?

So the movies are gonna suck only because they won't show footage at NYCC?
What kind of logic is that?

TheCorpulent1
10-03-2010, 12:56 PM
Studios sometimes keep movies they don't think have turned out well under wraps so that people don't get a chance to spread bad word of mouth about them before their opening weekends. But I very much doubt that's the case with Thor. More likely, Marvel's suits probably figure they've given fans a taste of the movie with the San Diego Comic-Con footage and they're not quite ready to start really ramping up the promotional campaign for the movie's release, since said release is still over 6 months away.

Gamma Burst
10-03-2010, 01:04 PM
Studios sometimes keep movies they don't think have turned out well under wraps so that people don't get a chance to spread bad word of mouth about them before their opening weekends. But I very much doubt that's the case with Thor. More likely, Marvel's suits probably figure they've given fans a taste of the movie with the San Diego Comic-Con footage and they're not quite ready to start really ramping up the promotional campaign for the movie's release, since said release is still over 6 months away.

That's my impression about it too.

TheCorpulent1
10-03-2010, 01:05 PM
I think around February or March of next year we'll start seeing a lot more stuff about Thor.

Parker Wayne
10-03-2010, 02:20 PM
I think around February or March of next year we'll start seeing a lot more stuff about Thor.

Yeah probably. We didn't see an official Iron Man 2 trailer until around December/January and they really didn't start going full force until February of this year with Marketing.

Chewy
10-03-2010, 02:29 PM
I think around February or March of next year we'll start seeing a lot more stuff about Thor.
We'll definitely get a theatrical trailer before the year ends

lixdexia
10-03-2010, 02:31 PM
i hope this years superbowl is full of trailers. i remember when the batman begins trailer hit, i gave up on the game and watched it on a loop for what had to be a half hour

misjuevos
10-03-2010, 03:11 PM
hoping to see some lightning in the finished trailer. i really can't wait for this movie.

TheCorpulent1
10-03-2010, 03:19 PM
I really just want to see him hit something/someone with Mjolnir.

Figs
10-03-2010, 03:51 PM
i hope this years superbowl is full of trailers. i remember when the batman begins trailer hit, i gave up on the game and watched it on a loop for what had to be a half hour

Having a TV spot for Thor and or Captain America during the Superbowl would be fantastic. Although i've been getting into Football more and more as i'm getting older, the advertisements are still the best part of the Superbowl at times.

Doctor Jones
10-03-2010, 03:53 PM
I like the hype of the Superbowl. It's about the only complete football game I watch. This year's game was boring as hell.

Hopefully there's a Cap or Thor spot. It will probably be Thor. Maybe a possible GL one too.

DCUmoviepage
10-03-2010, 04:26 PM
Hopefully there's a Cap or Thor spot. It will probably be Thor. Maybe a possible GL one too.

I hope soo, if this happen will be a great Super Bowl! And i enjoy the Empire cover,maybe have new pics inside.

misjuevos
10-03-2010, 04:56 PM
really hope to see thor throw mjolnir threw a frost giant.http://www.comicartcommunity.com/gallery/data/media/190/ThorAgesOfThunderPreview4.jpg

Vartha
10-03-2010, 05:22 PM
The last time EMPIRE spoke about Thor it was said how the film wouldn't work, and the author made fun of the whole idea.


I'm guessing they take that back when the film comes out. heh
The thing I dislike about these critics is they judge something like the 3D only and not the entire film, or they have NO IDEA what they're talking about when it comes to the stories of the character. :doh:

Compi716
10-03-2010, 10:20 PM
Um...guys? Guess what Clark Gregg posted on his Twitter:
http://www.movie-list.com/trailers.php?id=thor

RetroNaz
10-03-2010, 10:32 PM
Umm I don't like this. I LOVE this!

TheCorpulent1
10-03-2010, 10:35 PM
Awesome. Hopefully the people who couldn't get it sooner will be able to watch it now. :up:

RetroNaz
10-03-2010, 10:39 PM
So nice to see it again. 2011 can't come soon enough :(

XxDelta09xX
10-04-2010, 12:03 AM
Um...guys? Guess what Clark Gregg posted on his Twitter:
http://www.movie-list.com/trailers.php?id=thor

Nice!:woot:

Vartha
10-04-2010, 01:07 AM
Just wish it were the higher Res. Good to see it up again

misjuevos
10-04-2010, 05:20 AM
lol i just watched the other i had and now it's back. i must have seen this thing atleast 15 times by now. still enjoy it.

RealIrOnMaN
10-04-2010, 05:48 AM
NEW EMPIRE THOR IMAGES!!!! - http://spidermedia.ru/node/2968 (THANKS TO HEYUGUYS.UK)!!

RetroNaz
10-04-2010, 06:52 AM
Awww YES! Thank you! :)

batsfan81
10-04-2010, 07:34 AM
Cool pics.

Vartha
10-04-2010, 07:58 AM
lol i just watched the other i had and now it's back. i must have seen this thing atleast 15 times by now. still enjoy it.
...just 15? MIS man Catch up! :D

Vartha
10-04-2010, 08:11 AM
new empire thor images!!!! - http://spidermedia.ru/node/2968 (thanks to heyuguys.uk)!!

sweet!

Crimson King
10-04-2010, 08:28 AM
NEW EMPIRE THOR IMAGES!!!! - http://spidermedia.ru/node/2968 (THANKS TO HEYUGUYS.UK)!!

Man, that armor looks good. I wasn't sure about the look at first but it's growing on me.

NickNitro
10-04-2010, 08:56 AM
Im gonna go out on a limb and say 2011 is going to be the highest grossing year for movies of all time.

Cap/Thor/Harry Potter the last of the films

Crimson King
10-04-2010, 08:58 AM
Im gonna go out on a limb and say 2011 is going to be the highest grossing year for movies of all time.

Cap/Thor/Harry Potter the last of the films

Not to mention Green Lantern and Transformers 3

RetroNaz
10-04-2010, 09:04 AM
It should help ease the pain that comes our way at the end of 2012 ;)

Crimson King
10-04-2010, 09:06 AM
I'm just glad that the Avengers movie comes out before the end of the world.

NickNitro
10-04-2010, 09:09 AM
yea aeamek Transformers 3 and GL as well.....jeeze should I start saving now? ha

also Xmen: First Class even though itll probably bomb.

Vartha
10-04-2010, 10:29 AM
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/Vartha1/Thor/movie%20images/Cover257sml.jpg

terry78
10-04-2010, 10:33 AM
That cover may as well be the first teaser poster.

JP
10-04-2010, 10:51 AM
Awesome pictures are awesome!

Vartha
10-04-2010, 11:01 AM
More at the link RealIronMan posted.

The_Mighty_Thor
10-04-2010, 11:32 AM
Damn, limited edition subscriber cover only! :cmad: As much as I want it I won't be subscribing to that rag for it! :csad:

GhostPoet
10-04-2010, 01:30 PM
Who's Thor talking to by the campfire?

Aesop Rocks
10-04-2010, 01:31 PM
the director/

NickNitro
10-04-2010, 02:22 PM
@ GhostPoet Prob Natalie Portman and the others when he fell to earth and is trying to figure everything out.

This website rocks my socks

LuisTX85
10-04-2010, 03:02 PM
NEW EMPIRE THOR IMAGES!!!! - http://spidermedia.ru/node/2968 (THANKS TO HEYUGUYS.UK)!!

FINALLY some new pics!,And I like what I see.

Aesop Rocks
10-04-2010, 03:04 PM
Well, heh, we're only two months away from a trailer~

Chewy
10-04-2010, 03:07 PM
I'm just glad that the Avengers movie comes out before the end of the world.
I hope you knocked on wood :argh:

Crimson King
10-04-2010, 03:21 PM
I hope you knocked on wood :argh:

No need, my friend. The Mayans were fairly specific in their laziness at not completing their calendar past a certain date.

Spider-Vader
10-04-2010, 03:28 PM
That's probably what happened.


But I can't wait for the promotions for this movie to start. It'll be nice seeing the god of thunder everyday. :D

Raiden
10-04-2010, 03:42 PM
This new Empire photo is amazing.

BizarroAids
10-04-2010, 03:54 PM
Wow, those new photos are naughty!!!:hrt:

misjuevos
10-04-2010, 03:59 PM
...just 15? MIS man Catch up! :D

i meant this new one 15 times,lol i couldnt even think how many times i seen the other one. between showing people and just watching after comic con i hope i didnt spoil myself for the movie though.

jacobed
10-04-2010, 05:49 PM
I love the silouette shot of Thor and Loki

Gamma Burst
10-04-2010, 06:18 PM
Man,great pics!The armor looks fantastic!

dark_knight08
10-04-2010, 07:05 PM
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/Vartha1/Thor/movie%20images/Cover257sml.jpg

:thor:This is an amazing picture of Chris Hemsworth as Thor.

GoblinWhirlwind
10-04-2010, 07:22 PM
That cover is awesome... almost perfect.

DarknessOfDeath
10-04-2010, 08:44 PM
Any pictures of Natalie as Jane Foster? Just curious. lol

XxDelta09xX
10-04-2010, 11:51 PM
NEW EMPIRE THOR IMAGES!!!! - http://spidermedia.ru/node/2968 (THANKS TO HEYUGUYS.UK)!!

These pics are Amazing!!!:wow:

Vartha
10-05-2010, 09:09 AM
Any pictures of Natalie as Jane Foster? Just curious. lol
Just the one with Nat and Chris talking to Kenneth around the Campfire
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/Vartha1/Thor/movie%20images/9-8.jpg

Vartha
10-05-2010, 09:12 AM
I want to know where the high res of these are.
On the average when pics are released in a magazine they're also online too soon after.

Antonello Blueberry
10-05-2010, 10:03 AM
The magazine is not on the stands yet. Give it a week.

Vartha
10-05-2010, 10:25 AM
I just figure if people have their Subscribed mag maybe the pics would be out too.

RealIrOnMaN
10-05-2010, 12:11 PM
THOR cover update from EMPIRE:
http://www.empireonline.com/images/magazine/cover.jpg

RealIrOnMaN
10-05-2010, 12:14 PM
http://www.empireonline.com/images/magazine/257/1.jpg
Forsooth! What light through yonder magazine breaks? It's the Norse God of Thunder, and Kenneth Branagh is his director!

Our James went on set of Marvel's latest superhero movie to find out how Captain Kirk's dad, Shakespeare's biggest director and a really outlandish Avenger are getting along together.

Have they kept the Shakespearean dialogue that Thor is famous for? Will he bring the thunder? And what's this about The Destroyer?

Vartha
10-05-2010, 12:17 PM
Cool, at least the cover's similar
THOR cover update from EMPIRE:
http://www.empireonline.com/images/magazine/cover.jpg

RealIrOnMaN
10-05-2010, 12:51 PM
Empire Magazine: Here are a few tasters from director Kenneth Branagh himself on what we can expect from the Norse God:

"The issue of tone was crucial, because in the '60s run of comics it does get pretty camp. So the trick was finding a way to make a different kind of superhero - a god - compelling and arresting and not make him too flamboyant," says the former Shakespearean wunderkind.

"The script is an epic adventure with, at the centre, human dynamics. I looked at the relationships and saw brothers, mother, father and sons: the tight royal circle. When you get down to it, this is pure Shakespeare: it's a drama about familial problems concerning thse who possess great power."

"When I came along there had been several strands of development. One kept the movie entirely in the Viking era, and one was more fantastical. I wanted to do something that possibly touched on both. What appealed to me from the myths and comics was a sort of Prodigal Son story - of exile and return. That and the enjoyment of seeing a fish out of water. The notion of Asgardians coming to modern-day Earth was particularly important to me. I actually, coming from the direction of period drama, was the one most resistant to setting it entirely in a historical context."

For more from Branagh and star Chris Hemsworth, and loads more images from Thor, head on out and buy a copy of the November issue of Empire. Otherwise, you'll have to wait until the movie is released on April 29 next year.

NickNitro
10-05-2010, 03:34 PM
@RealIronman

Dude you are coming through with flying colors for us fans! This was a great exerpt (spelling) from Branagh and really shows how much he knows about what not to do with the movie. He said about not making it campy and try to touch on both the Viking and Mystical aspects of Thor.

He has a great head on his shoulders and I think will produce and fantastic film. Again this is the movie I am most hyped about for next year and I keep hearing better and better news.

Thanks again.

RealIrOnMaN
10-05-2010, 04:17 PM
@RealIronmanThanks again.
Don't mention it) And yes, Kenneth is awesome in every way possible!

TheCorpulent1
10-06-2010, 07:20 AM
I'm so glad they got him to direct. He really seems to understand the character dynamics of Thor. Big, epic spectacle on the surface, but a deeply emotional, character-driven family drama at its core. :up:

GhostPoet
10-06-2010, 02:09 PM
I'll be honest...I love the helmet, but I think watching the film...I probably won't miss it.

Crimson King
10-06-2010, 02:13 PM
I'll be honest...I love the helmet, but I think watching the film...I probably won't miss it.

I love the helmet too and agree with you. You know what I think it might be? Proportions. They're not going to get an actor big enough to match his size in the comics. When you put that helmet on a smaller, leaner actor, it doesn't look as good.

TheCorpulent1
10-06-2010, 02:21 PM
The proportions seemed fine based on what little we saw of him with the helmet on in the Comic Con footage. But I won't really miss the helmet too much either. It's great that they included it, but I tend to just brace myself for any masked/helmeted heroes to lose their masks/helmets at some point in movies because movies demand actors' faces be shown. Spider-Man and Batman are basically the only exceptions I can think of, and that's mainly because they spend plenty of time out of costume in their movies anyway.

Vartha
10-06-2010, 02:34 PM
The proportions seemed fine based on what little we saw of him with the helmet on in the Comic Con footage. But I won't really miss the helmet too much either. It's great that they included it, but I tend to just brace myself for any masked/helmeted heroes to lose their masks/helmets at some point in movies because movies demand actors' faces be shown. Spider-Man and Batman are basically the only exceptions I can think of, and that's mainly because they spend plenty of time out of costume in their movies anyway.
Thing is with Thor at least THIS version, being out of costume is the same guy, in a way the comic's Don Blake is his mask.
To ME I hope they use that helmet more often than just Throne room scenes. At least with movie posters I hope they have it on him.

LuisTX85
10-06-2010, 03:27 PM
Based on the comic-con trailer/pic of Thor in&out of costume.....I assume he will only get his helmet in the beginning for the first two scenes and last scene.

With his helmet on most of the time for the Avengers!.

Gamma Burst
10-06-2010, 03:59 PM
It seems Branagh really gets Thor!I'm sure this film is gonna be amazing,and my expectations couldn't be higher!

VENOMisHERE
10-07-2010, 01:11 AM
Were are the pictures...?...LOL

Vartha
10-07-2010, 02:29 AM
Here http://spidermedia.ru/node/2968
A couple pages back in this section too

RealIrOnMaN
10-07-2010, 07:14 AM
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/7798/12918281.jpg (http://www.sega.com/thor/)
Click on it, guys. If any of you will be able to open all (trailer/concept art/info) menus, than you're lucky)

The_Mighty_Thor
10-07-2010, 07:43 AM
Damn! he's not even wearing his helmet in the video game!:hehe:

AVEITWITHJAMON
10-07-2010, 08:47 AM
What are people's thoughts about the Empire article mentioning that Thor and the Asgardians are aliens?

Crimson King
10-07-2010, 08:48 AM
Well, technically they are aliens since they're not from Earth.

TheCorpulent1
10-07-2010, 08:54 AM
True. I don't really care what they call them, though. So long as no one involved in the production comes right out and says, "There is absolutely nothing divine about these characters at all, period," they're the Norse gods to me.

Gamma Burst
10-07-2010, 09:51 AM
What are people's thoughts about the Empire article mentioning that Thor and the Asgardians are aliens?

No problem here.All the pantheons in the Marvel Universe are considered 'extra-dimensional' beings.It doesn't make them any less godly.

DCUmoviepage
10-07-2010, 01:23 PM
The helmet is a classic part of Thor, but i dont feel if work on live action all the time, but looks nice on screen. Maybe the helmet is a simbol of honor and royalty, as Thor as been exile for Asgard, he dont deserve to use it,until he prove he is a humblest person .

TheCorpulent1
10-07-2010, 01:32 PM
Parts of Thor's outfit definitely seem to have some kind of significance. It looks like Odin takes his cape away when he's banishing him, for example.

GhostPoet
10-07-2010, 01:50 PM
Parts of Thor's outfit definitely seem to have some kind of significance. It looks like Odin takes his cape away when he's banishing him, for example.

I suppose the cape is a symbol of authority and respect in their culture?

Gamma Burst
10-07-2010, 01:56 PM
I suppose the cape is a symbol of authority and respect in their culture?

Maybe.A cape is often used as a symbol of power.

Vartha
10-07-2010, 05:41 PM
Cool can't wait!

http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/7798/12918281.jpg (http://www.sega.com/thor/)
Click on it, guys. If any of you will be able to open all (trailer/concept art/info) menus, than you're lucky)

al35077
10-07-2010, 09:26 PM
I hope the thor game doesnt suck like the Iron Man games did.

TheCorpulent1
10-07-2010, 09:41 PM
There's a very good chance it will. But I'm sure I'll wind up playing it anyway.

al35077
10-07-2010, 09:51 PM
Yeah I'll be renting it for sure

Vartha
10-08-2010, 07:52 AM
I'll buy it cuz it's THOR. :D

MikeFrost
10-08-2010, 10:02 AM
Movie game tie-ins suffer from a lack of time to develop. Too much pressure on a team of developers with a big release date to hit.

They have literally no more than 2 years/1 year and a half to produce these. Being on the industry myself, I can tell you that it's hilariously short time to produce a game from scratch.

lixdexia
10-08-2010, 10:05 AM
i'll rent it because i like movie games (for the way they expand the movies universe) but i'll wait till it hits the $5 rack...and it will

RealIrOnMaN
10-08-2010, 01:41 PM
NYCC'10 - Brian Bendis on "Thor", "The Avengers" and Marc Webb's "Spider-Man":
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRgdk7HafptIMOc-6G2eYwAQQJ03gzX5Mb6b7k0W0utP2laW5w&t=1&usg=__2F81U0mKKVgZzrlzM9uXyPechpg=
"Saw a lot of Thor-related things. It's going to be amazing. Kenneth Branagh is awesome. I also had a meeting with Joss Whedon and they showed us some very cool ("The Avengers") stuff, that I can't talk about right now.

I also had a meeting with the new Spider-Man movie crew. Can't say or reveal anything. But I was surprised, when I found out that the guy from "The Social Network" is going to play Peter Parker."

Wynter
10-08-2010, 05:46 PM
No problem here.All the pantheons in the Marvel Universe are considered 'extra-dimensional' beings.It doesn't make them any less godly.

Yeah, just like D&D; they're extraplaner. It even sounds cool.

scatterax
10-08-2010, 11:42 PM
I think he's only gonna wear his helmit for cerimonial type things. like we'll prolly see it in the beginning and not again till the end in some starwars-esque final scene.

Vartha
10-09-2010, 01:40 AM
Movie game tie-ins suffer from a lack of time to develop. Too much pressure on a team of developers with a big release date to hit.

They have literally no more than 2 years/1 year and a half to produce these. Being on the industry myself, I can tell you that it's hilariously short time to produce a game from scratch.
In a way Sega had a head start on Thor if you think about it. They did Viking: Battle for Asgard too, and I loved that game.

Tho I get what you are saying they have many of the models for the game right there so HOPEFULLY they could use that to their advantage and work more on the stand alone Story (which was written by Fraction by the way).

herolee10
10-09-2010, 04:21 AM
You know, there's one thing that I'm curious about.

I've read back, on how a lot of Thor fans were displeased when there were incarnations where Hulk was presented as Strong enough to lift up Thor's hammer, despite being "unworthy" for it since it felt like a slap to Thor's own character.


So how would fans of Thor feel if Captain America is able to lift it up in the upcoming Avengers film since I read that he was one of the very few who the hammer felt 'worthy'?

RealIrOnMaN
10-09-2010, 04:55 AM
Thor: The Mighty Avenger (3inch Series - LOOK AT THE PACKAGE! AWESOME!)
http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5333/42147177.th.jpg (http://img534.imageshack.us/i/42147177.jpg/) http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/4093/66318730.th.jpg (http://img20.imageshack.us/i/66318730.jpg/) http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/4530/13336364.th.jpg (http://img409.imageshack.us/i/13336364.jpg/) http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7744/59997923.th.jpg (http://img412.imageshack.us/i/59997923.jpg/) http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/2889/42801174.th.jpg (http://img822.imageshack.us/i/42801174.jpg/) http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/7919/52210605.th.jpg (http://img85.imageshack.us/i/52210605.jpg/) http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/9464/86757299.th.jpg (http://img651.imageshack.us/i/86757299.jpg/)
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/7951/68669717q.th.jpg (http://img94.imageshack.us/i/68669717q.jpg/) http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/9291/24605694.th.jpg (http://img716.imageshack.us/i/24605694.jpg/) http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/6362/97393248.th.jpg (http://img251.imageshack.us/i/97393248.jpg/)

RealIrOnMaN
10-09-2010, 04:56 AM
http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/6914/49547654.th.jpg (http://img813.imageshack.us/i/49547654.jpg/) http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/7636/11394413.th.jpg (http://img69.imageshack.us/i/11394413.jpg/) http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/1917/98126537.th.jpg (http://img85.imageshack.us/i/98126537.jpg/) http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/4366/73883376.th.jpg (http://img63.imageshack.us/i/73883376.jpg/)

BizarroAids
10-09-2010, 06:11 AM
I'm getting that sexy helmet!:hrt:

RealIrOnMaN
10-09-2010, 06:19 AM
http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/2889/42801174.jpg
Just look at Chris!

Vartha
10-09-2010, 08:39 AM
I'm getting that sexy helmet!:hrt:
MY problem with that helmet is it's not a full head Helmet. I hope they make a full head version like they did with IronMan's helmet.

bunk
10-09-2010, 08:39 AM
I don't remember those hanging red strips from his waist. I'm also wondering where the rest of his cape is.

Vartha
10-09-2010, 08:41 AM
Compared to the SDCC pics of the figures these look WAY better

http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/6914/49547654.th.jpg (http://img813.imageshack.us/i/49547654.jpg/) http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/7636/11394413.th.jpg (http://img69.imageshack.us/i/11394413.jpg/) http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/1917/98126537.th.jpg (http://img85.imageshack.us/i/98126537.jpg/) http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/4366/73883376.th.jpg (http://img63.imageshack.us/i/73883376.jpg/)

Vartha
10-09-2010, 08:43 AM
I don't remember those hanging red strips from his waist. I'm also wondering where the rest of his cape is.
yeah I don't remember the waist strips either unless it's from later in the film.

Son of Thunder
10-09-2010, 09:17 AM
Forget about the red strips - what about bare arms and completely different chest armor? There are no armored disks on it from the waist up. Kind of a cool walking around Asgard look, since he wouldn't need to be so armored up.

Vartha
10-09-2010, 09:33 AM
Yeah I'm betting Thor will have different clothes for different purposes.

bunk
10-09-2010, 09:43 AM
I'm glad they gave him a "face-scratching action" hand. That's an important feature.

terry78
10-09-2010, 09:45 AM
SWORD BECOMES HAMMER!!!!

:awesome:

RealIrOnMaN
10-09-2010, 10:26 AM
MARVEL NYCC'10 Live: December will be the big unveiling of Thor, so keep your eyes peeled!

Whiskey Tango
10-09-2010, 10:34 AM
Despite thousands of years of battle experience, knowledge of the powerful Swivel-Arm Battle Grip technique continues to elude the Mighty Thor!

And thus, while his might is legendary, his toys remain inferior.

TheCorpulent1
10-09-2010, 10:36 AM
SWORD BECOMES HAMMER!!!!

:awesome:
Hahaha, that made me crack up for some reason. :D

Vartha
10-09-2010, 11:34 AM
Hahaha, that made me crack up for some reason. :D
lol I snickered too.

Vartha
10-09-2010, 11:36 AM
MARVEL NYCC'10 Live: December will be the big unveiling of Thor, so keep your eyes peeled!
NICE two more months.

TheCorpulent1
10-09-2010, 11:42 AM
I wonder what that means. Are we gonna get our first public trailer in December or something? I can't wait to go to the theater and be regaled with a Thor trailer before movies. :hehe:

Hazelnut624
10-09-2010, 11:47 AM
Packaging is sweet!
figures.. not so much.

RealIrOnMaN
10-09-2010, 11:49 AM
I wonder what that means. Are we gonna get our first public trailer in December or something?
Yes, you are correct.

TheCorpulent1
10-09-2010, 11:52 AM
Well, it's cool to finally have an idea of when it's coming, but that's soooo far away. Good thing I have The Walking Dead to tide me over for November. :)

ddddeeee
10-09-2010, 11:58 AM
I'm guessing it'll debut with Tron.

TheCorpulent1
10-09-2010, 11:59 AM
Sweet, I intended to watch that anyway.

Eze
10-09-2010, 02:45 PM
Despite thousands of years of battle experience, knowledge of the powerful Swivel-Arm Battle Grip technique continues to elude the Mighty Thor!

And thus, while his might is legendary, his toys remain inferior.

lmao!

Vartha
10-09-2010, 03:21 PM
Well, it's cool to finally have an idea of when it's coming, but that's soooo far away. Good thing I have The Walking Dead to tide me over for November. :)
heh we've been saying that for awhile now. There's all the comics, and MUA to keep us busy too.

TheCorpulent1
10-09-2010, 03:25 PM
Oh, the Avengers cartoon now, too. Starts in another week or so. :up:

Vartha
10-09-2010, 03:30 PM
Oh, the Avengers cartoon now, too. Starts in another week or so. :up:
I forgot about that, tho I don't have cable.:doh:

Symbiotic
10-09-2010, 05:35 PM
So is the movie gonna have the 'Mighty Avenger' subtitle? Or is that a toys and merch thing? It'd make sense to use it for the movie since Captain America gets 'The First Avenger'.

Son of Coul
10-09-2010, 05:39 PM
I'm thinking (and hoping) it's solely a merch thing. Cap's title is one thing but like Feige said, these movies gotta stand on their own and not seem like they're only a buildup to The Avengers. The toys I perfectly understand.

scatterax
10-09-2010, 05:42 PM
Iron Man 3:Rich Avenger

Figs
10-09-2010, 05:54 PM
Iron Man 3 Drunk Avenger

Fixed :woot:

TheCorpulent1
10-09-2010, 07:00 PM
Shouldn't Thor be "the Divine Avenger," then? We could even get some free publicity when religious groups show up to protest the movie. :D

Figs
10-09-2010, 07:12 PM
Shouldn't Thor be "the Divine Avenger," then? We could even get some free publicity when religious groups show up to protest the movie. :D

Hahaha! Great idea, would definitely put it in the spotlight.

Vartha
10-09-2010, 07:31 PM
Shouldn't Thor be "the Divine Avenger," then? We could even get some free publicity when religious groups show up to protest the movie. :D
INDEED :woot:

scatterax
10-09-2010, 11:45 PM
Nah, christians don't protest any beliefs that are widely considered to be myths. there wouldn't be much point in that.

obin_gam
10-10-2010, 04:39 AM
Nah, christians don't protest any beliefs that are widely considered to be myths. there wouldn't be much point in that.
they just follow them :whatever:

RetroNaz
10-10-2010, 05:11 AM
Anyways, let's keep the religious talk out of here as it can be quite offensive one way or the other.

dnno1
10-10-2010, 08:00 AM
According to CBM (http://www.**************.com/fansites/marvelfreshman/news/?a=23743#postcomment), they are doing reshoots of "Thor". Apparently they need to redo some secenes involving large crowds. The resoots will involve some prominents cast members as well as extras. I don't know if this is a good or bad thing, but it certainly adds to the expense of the film.

Vartha
10-10-2010, 09:12 AM
According to CBM (http://www.**************.com/fansites/marvelfreshman/news/?a=23743#postcomment), they are doing reshoots of "Thor". Apparently they need to redo some secenes involving large crowds. The resoots will involve some prominents cast members as well as extras. I don't know if this is a good or bad thing, but it certainly adds to the expense of the film.
Good thing when they need to reshoot something over, "let's just use what we have":woot:

Moridin
10-10-2010, 09:50 AM
What vartha said.
Reshoots/pick ups are pretty common, they're not an indicator that the film is in trouble.

RealIrOnMaN
10-10-2010, 10:39 AM
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/552/thormovie02899x1200.jpg

TheCorpulent1
10-10-2010, 10:49 AM
That hammer is ginormous compared to his hand. Does it light up or something? Looks like there's a battery inside the head.

Vartha
10-10-2010, 12:49 PM
maybe the reflection of Warmachine behind Thor.
Tho I'm glad there's more than one figure, and they DO look alot better than the ones at SDCC.

Brian Braddock
10-10-2010, 01:02 PM
Corps right imo, you can some semlance of a circuit and the hammer must light up otherwise the hammer wouldnt have been made so translucent.

It's a cool looking figure to be sure - so why do I think 'Bee Gee's' everytime I see it.

Vartha
10-10-2010, 01:15 PM
Corps right imo, you can some semlance of a circuit and the hammer must light up otherwise the hammer wouldnt have been made so translucent.

It's a cool looking figure to be sure - so why do I think 'Bee Gee's' everytime I see it.
The superhero squad New Thor costume has thor spinning Mjolnir with a lightning bolt following the spin that's transparent and doesn't light up.
I can't see how they can make a 3 inch figure light up even with a watch battery.


heh cuz he does look alittle like one of the Gibb's

scatterax
10-10-2010, 02:51 PM
The superhero squad New Thor costume has thor spinning Mjolnir with a lightning bolt following the spin that's transparent and doesn't light up.
I can't see how they can make a 3 inch figure light up even with a watch battery.


heh cuz he does look alittle like one of the Gibb's

Oh ok. so..what did u just say again?

TheCorpulent1
10-10-2010, 02:52 PM
The fact that the hammer's translucent doesn't necessarily mean it'll light up, basically.

wobbly
10-10-2010, 03:27 PM
The Hammer looks a little loose on the hilt so it might be spring loaded using a piezo action as both the swtich and power for the light/Led (so no battery required). Don't think it would light up for long though.

The_Mighty_Thor
10-10-2010, 04:37 PM
.
I can't see how they can make a 3 inch figure light up even with a watch battery.


A watch is smaller than a three inch figure and they usually light up, right??? It doesn't take much to light up a diode.

Spider-Vader
10-10-2010, 04:43 PM
Yeah there's a light-up IM figure in that scale out right now.

I don't like that Thor's open hand though. But it looks pretty decent besides that.

Still A ThorFan
10-10-2010, 05:57 PM
Did anyone notice Empire believes the movie will come out April 29th? And why is KB even mentioning the 60's Thor, that is 40 years ago. Any source material he needed for the movie he could have just got from the current volume. Nothing campy there.

marcvader
10-10-2010, 06:05 PM
Did anyone notice Empire believes the movie will come out April 29th? And why is KB even mentioning the 60's Thor, that is 40 years ago. Any source material he needed for the movie he could have just got from the current volume. Nothing campy there.

Are you serious?

Chewy
10-10-2010, 06:14 PM
And why is KB even mentioning the 60's Thor, that is 40 years ago. Any source material he needed for the movie he could have just got from the current volume. Nothing campy there.
http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/7556/chrishemsworthwhat.jpg

Aesop Rocks
10-10-2010, 06:18 PM
I agree, ThorFan.

Kane52630
10-10-2010, 06:30 PM
http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/7556/chrishemsworthwhat.jpg

bLEuWEvH5GI

al35077
10-10-2010, 08:15 PM
I wear my sunglasses at night too

Vartha
10-11-2010, 01:02 AM
Oh ok. so..what did u just say again?
Yeah what Corpy said lol

THIS version had blue lightning and another same figure but with Abomination had clear lightning. NETHER lit up and was just plain Translucent.

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/Vartha1/Thor/movie%20images/toys/Merchandise-superherosquad-newthor_ares-02182008.jpg

Vartha
10-11-2010, 01:08 AM
A watch is smaller than a three inch figure and they usually light up, right??? It doesn't take much to light up a diode.
Yeah true, thinking about it now a few of the EARLY toy biz figures had some light up figures and talking figures, (heh "I want to eat your Brains" Venom :D ) this Thor just doesn't look like it'd light up, I'd be happy if it did.