PDA

View Full Version : Spider-Man Reboot Costume


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

socool
12-28-2010, 01:04 PM
He was very Spider-Man like to me.

http://images.sugarscape.com/userfiles/image/editors/OMGCATBIG.jpg


YOU BLEW TEH KITTEH'S MIND!

You obviously are not one for casting choices.

NinjaCarm
12-28-2010, 02:42 PM
http://images.sugarscape.com/userfiles/image/editors/OMGCATBIG.jpg


YOU BLEW TEH KITTEH'S MIND!

You obviously are not one for casting choices.

Awesome I blew that kitten's mind, I'm so happY!

Immortalfire
12-28-2010, 02:47 PM
http://i576.photobucket.com/albums/ss210/KAWpics/SpideyFeet.png

I think I see something in his eye..

roach
12-28-2010, 03:11 PM
its venom....

Immortalfire
12-28-2010, 03:16 PM
That's what I figured.

Chris Wallace
12-28-2010, 03:21 PM
What was awesome?! He crouched there in front of the camera telling you to vote. He did NOTHING Spider-man except wear the costume.

Next he'll be promoting the guy in the Visa commercial.
When are we gonna get posts recommending THAT suit?

roach
12-28-2010, 03:26 PM
what about the suit in the visa commercial

El Payaso
12-28-2010, 03:37 PM
Then fans will protest that change.

Who the hell cares?

Did anyone complain about Joker's face-painting reasons in TDK? Scratch that, did anyone care about those compaints?

chaseter
12-28-2010, 03:46 PM
Yes, yes they did.

Immortalfire
12-28-2010, 03:47 PM
Who the hell cares?

Did anyone complain about Joker's face-painting reasons in TDK? Scratch that, did anyone care about those compaints?

Is Ed "Too Tall" Jones, too tall?

El Payaso
12-28-2010, 03:56 PM
Is Ed "Too Tall" Jones, too tall?

I don't know the guy. Maybe it's just the nickname.

roach
12-28-2010, 04:04 PM
Who the hell cares?

Did anyone complain about Joker's face-painting reasons in TDK? Scratch that, did anyone care about those compaints?

Before TDK came out these boards were rife with complains of Joker looking like the crow and Nolan messing up the most iconic villain of all time.

after TDK came out only a few cared

chaseter
12-28-2010, 04:08 PM
I rarely venture onto the Batboards but I remember the good 'ole makeup vs permawhite thread.

roach
12-28-2010, 04:10 PM
I rarely venture onto the Batboards but I remember the good 'ole makeup vs permawhite thread.

many Bothans died in that thread

Chris Wallace
12-28-2010, 05:14 PM
Who the hell cares?

Did anyone complain about Joker's face-painting reasons in TDK? Scratch that, did anyone care about those compaints?

Dude, we have been over this. The rules don't apply where Nolan is concerned. He doesn't have to follow the source material because he's Nolan. He can kill puppies with splinters and get away with it because he's Nolan. He pisses platinum and is above reproach or criticism of any kind. The only director we are permitted to hold in similar regard on these boards is Webb. Praise or defense of any other filmmaker will be met with extreme vengeance.

GoblinWhirlwind
12-28-2010, 05:18 PM
This is what happens with a lack of any real news or pictures.

Chris Wallace
12-28-2010, 05:26 PM
Sometimes it happens when you HAVE news or pics. I remember when the first black suit pic came out, there was all kinds of speculation that it was fake, that it was a trick of the light, that it wasn't really a color photo-and my personal favorite: that Spidey had switched to a black suit because he was in mourning. People tried to convince us that the first Goblin pics were fake, that the Superman Returns suit was actually brightly colored but the pics were badly lit, the first Ledger/Joker pic was fake & he was actually perma-white, it goes on & on. Some people live for gossip & innuendo.

Droogoonie789
12-28-2010, 07:12 PM
In the comics he had no real reason. He just wanted to be theatrical to get Spidey's attention. I believe he duped Spidey into thinking they were going to be doing a movie together.

According to the Wikipedia page, the Goblin persona was from nightmares Norman had as a young boy. The page links it to Peter Parker: Spider-Man vol. 2 #25. That would require quite a bit of exposition, but over the course of several movies they might be able to achieve it.

roach
12-28-2010, 07:14 PM
yeah that was a recent addition to the mythos

NinjaCarm
12-28-2010, 07:27 PM
yeah that was a recent addition to the mythos

So?

roach
12-28-2010, 07:37 PM
are you just bound and determined to fight me at every turn

NinjaCarm
12-28-2010, 07:52 PM
are you just bound and determined to fight me at every turn

Are you? I asked a simple question.

socool
12-28-2010, 08:56 PM
Are you? I asked a simple question.

But the question was one provoking him. Why did you even ask it in the first place?

NinjaCarm
12-28-2010, 10:36 PM
But the question was one provoking him. Why did you even ask it in the first place?

It's Spider-Man thread team up now is it? Why does anyone in here ask a question? For the answer.

chaseter
12-28-2010, 10:48 PM
What was the question?

ModestMr.Green
12-28-2010, 11:13 PM
According to the Wikipedia page, the Goblin persona was from nightmares Norman had as a young boy.

'Why goblins, sir?'

'Goblins frighten me...it's time my enemies shared my dread.'

PreK
12-28-2010, 11:19 PM
It's Spider-Man thread team up now is it? Why does anyone in here ask a question? For the answer.
Doesn't look like he was contending you at all. It read like he was just adding a tidbit to the information previously stated. If I may answer your initial question: So -- nothing.

Chris Wallace
12-29-2010, 07:17 AM
According to the Wikipedia page, the Goblin persona was from nightmares Norman had as a young boy. The page links it to Peter Parker: Spider-Man vol. 2 #25. That would require quite a bit of exposition, but over the course of several movies they might be able to achieve it.

And today's word, boys & girls is "retcon".

Hurm...
12-29-2010, 07:27 AM
'Why goblins, sir?'

'Goblins frighten me...it's time my enemies shared my dread.'LOL!!:woot:

roach
12-29-2010, 07:30 AM
And today's word, boys & girls is "retcon".

yup when he came on the scene there was no explanation given for why he chose the goblin persona...other than he was nuttier than a fruitcake

Chris Wallace
12-29-2010, 07:31 AM
'Why goblins, sir?'

'Goblins frighten me...it's time my enemies shared my dread.'

Good one.

roach
12-29-2010, 07:33 AM
ahhh superherohype.com rule 38...every thread must contain a reference to TDK and Nolan

Chris Wallace
12-29-2010, 07:35 AM
So far I haven't seen any in the Michael Jackson thread-despite the eerie similarities between the TDK suit & the HIStory tour getup.

Eggyman
12-29-2010, 07:37 AM
So far I haven't seen any in the Michael Jackson thread-despite the eerie similarities between the TDK suit & the HIStory tour getup.

Sure help Moonwalking out of the driveway easier :o

roach
12-29-2010, 07:40 AM
So far I haven't seen any in the Michael Jackson thread-despite the eerie similarities between the TDK suit & the HIStory tour getup.

are you saying that MJ faked his death just like Batman did at the end of DKR and is in a cave with an army of followers calling themselves the Sons of MJ...they mark themselves by painting a white glove on their face.....he is waiting for the time to strike and bring true justice to the world

roach
12-29-2010, 07:43 AM
Sure help Moonwalking out of the driveway easier :o

"I also designed this system using a ecolocation so you will be able to see in the dark"
"Ahhh sonar just like..."
"Stevie Wonder...sir...just like Stevie Wonder"

Chris Wallace
12-29-2010, 07:43 AM
There's enough conspiracy theories floating around on that as it is, roach.

roach
12-29-2010, 07:44 AM
There's enough conspiracy theories floating around on that as it is, roach.

yeah I know

Chris Wallace
12-29-2010, 07:46 AM
God knows if I hear "Illuminati" one more time I'm gonna go on a rampage.

roach
12-29-2010, 07:54 AM
God knows if I hear "Illuminati" one more time I'm gonna go on a rampage.

Illuminati

Chris Wallace
12-29-2010, 10:55 AM
Should've seen that coming.

chaseter
12-29-2010, 11:05 AM
Illuminaughty

Droogoonie789
12-29-2010, 11:52 PM
'Why goblins, sir?'

'Goblins frighten me...it's time my enemies shared my dread.'

This made my day. :yay:

And today's word, boys & girls is "retcon".

It may be retcon, but it might make more sense to give him a legit reason for the Goblin persona other than being a complete nutbar. This was one of the many problems with Raimi's Spidey 1. I hate that perfect casting was wasted on bad character representation/design. Like Heath Ledger's Joker, but with a Power Ranger suit.

roach
12-30-2010, 01:10 AM
so its ok that joker gets no explanation but not for goblin????

El Payaso
12-30-2010, 04:44 AM
so its ok that joker gets no explanation but not for goblin????

You mean we shouldn't even know he's Norman Osbourne? Green Goblin comes out of the blue?

And it's not even like I'm against the idea.

roach
12-30-2010, 06:07 AM
thats how it was in the comics

Chris Wallace
12-30-2010, 08:35 AM
Didn't a solid 10 years pass before we found out Gobby's story? And wasn't it something like 40 before we got Joker's?

Crockett
12-30-2010, 08:47 AM
But if they ever do have Green Goblin as a villain in a SM movie I wouldn't mind if it were similar to "Spectacular Spider-Man" in terms of portrayal.

Mrpaul
12-30-2010, 08:48 AM
Well it's official. They're going with spandex as Andrew addressed in the interview

Chris Wallace
12-30-2010, 08:50 AM
You weren't honestly thinking it would be leather or rubber or something, were you?

Eggyman
12-30-2010, 08:51 AM
That's the second time he's said it. It doesn't mean much. Spandex is the go-to name when talking about superhero fashion. He could just be using the name loosely; meaning it's fairly lightweight and form-fitting... like the last suit, although you look at that and it doesn't look like spandex.

Chris Wallace
12-30-2010, 08:59 AM
Many people use the term loosely, in that exact sense.

El Payaso
12-30-2010, 09:34 AM
thats how it was in the comics
Didn't a solid 10 years pass before we found out Gobby's story?

Then I'm all for it.

And wasn't it something like 40 before we got Joker's?

I remember a comics from the 1940's or 1950's where Joker himself explained the red mask/chemical vat origin story.

Silver Knight
12-30-2010, 09:47 AM
Should have made it CGI.

Eggyman
12-30-2010, 10:45 AM
Many people use the term loosely, in that exact sense.

We're on the same page, rubber ducky.

NinjaCarm
12-30-2010, 11:04 AM
I cannot wait to see this brand new suit! I think Andrew used the term "spandex" loosely btw.

Gunga Diner
12-30-2010, 11:27 AM
should have made it cgi.
("i know, right!?!?")

GoblinWhirlwind
12-30-2010, 05:31 PM
I think Garfield meant what he said, at least in the sense that it'll be similiar to the previous costume. Thin, form fitting spandex like material. If it wasn't like spandex, he would've just said "costume". Can't wait to finally get a look at it.

Chris Wallace
12-30-2010, 05:33 PM
We're on the same page, rubber ducky.

As is often the case, I've found out.
@ Whirlwind-that doesn't contradict what Eggy said.

NinjaCarm
12-30-2010, 08:54 PM
Here's a sketch I did of a possible look for the mask, I've always been a fan of the rounded eyes as well.

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f111/batboy99/spideymask.jpg


Probably a little too much webbing, but along the lines as to how I'd like to see the mask look.

Gotta say I like this alot, very Steve Ditko.

Ajendo
12-31-2010, 05:55 AM
courtesy of Mr: Parker

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6229/3b57348e23e960ede30fc17.jpg

courtesy of hobo123

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5083/5309297910_653bc13935_z.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5203/5309297536_a1710e1575_b.jpg

These look great!

Eggyman
12-31-2010, 06:07 AM
I love all of them.

Galactus123
12-31-2010, 07:47 AM
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5083/5309297910_653bc13935_z.jpg



That is amazing! :wow: I really hope that its going to be something like that.

chaseter
12-31-2010, 08:24 AM
I sort of like how the webs kind of look like veins.

Gianakin_
12-31-2010, 08:36 AM
Loving the costume, and it's got the Bagley eyes (sorta). Good job.

Chris Wallace
12-31-2010, 08:47 AM
I sort of like how the webs kind of look like veins.

Reminds me of Venom.

Ajendo
12-31-2010, 09:24 AM
Eh? What picture are YOU looking at, Chris?

spider-neil
12-31-2010, 09:36 AM
("i know, right!?!?")

I can't hear that line anymore without getting angry.

GL = car crash

You know you shouldn't look but you just can't turn away

spidermanJLA!~
12-31-2010, 03:15 PM
http://neutralzonecomics.com/images/arossmbspidey.jpg

Ahem.

Don't you guys think this would be a nice change for the eyes? And the webs are nice and dark so they stand out.

http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/1761/mrspiderman3maskclassic.jpg




Hmmm. Hard decision. But I must say, as much as I like the big eyes, I am a supporter of a comic costume so I must the smaller eyes win. What do you guys like better? Big or Small?

Gamma Burst
12-31-2010, 03:34 PM
I can't hear that line anymore without getting angry.

GL = car crash

You know you shouldn't look but you just can't turn away

Totally.

Pac-Master
12-31-2010, 03:48 PM
Hmmm. Hard decision. But I must say, as much as I like the big eyes, I am a supporter of a comic costume so I must the smaller eyes win. What do you guys like better? Big or Small?
Smaller, but not so small that he looks like he's squinting.

NinjaCarm
12-31-2010, 03:55 PM
Hmmm. Hard decision. But I must say, as much as I like the big eyes, I am a supporter of a comic costume so I must the smaller eyes win. What do you guys like better? Big or Small?

I'm all about the smaller eyes in this reboot! Differentiate from the prior trilogy, again Raimi's costume was great, but I feel the smaller Romita Sr, Gill Kane eyes are the way to go.

I guess we will know soon (I hope!):yay:

roach
12-31-2010, 03:58 PM
or huge Todd Macfarlane eyes

Chris Wallace
12-31-2010, 04:08 PM
Hmmm. Hard decision. But I must say, as much as I like the big eyes, I am a supporter of a comic costume so I must the smaller eyes win. What do you guys like better? Big or Small?

That statement is a little puzzling because he's worn both in the comics, depending on the artist. I like a nice medium size. Bagley's are too big, Dell'Otto's are too small. Ross' are too small.

Ajendo
12-31-2010, 05:29 PM
For me, the size of the eyes depend on how the overall size of spidey is and how the costume looks. Larsen, McFarlane and Bagley drew big eyes that worked for me.



http://www.comicartfans.com/Images/Category_4374/subcat_103270/a4%20kevin%20spider-man%20jusko.jpg
http://www.comicartfans.com/Images/Category_4374/subcat_103270/a4%20kevin%20spider-man%20jusko.jpg

roach
12-31-2010, 05:33 PM
That statement is a little puzzling because he's worn both in the comics, depending on the artist. I like a nice medium size. Bagley's are too big, Dell'Otto's are too small. Ross' are too small.

whats your good size for spidey eyes then?

Immortalfire
12-31-2010, 05:47 PM
Spidey's eyes don't need to be half the size of his head.

nogap87
12-31-2010, 07:55 PM
I like smallish eyes because it makes him look mellow.

roach
12-31-2010, 08:06 PM
Spidey's eyes don't need to be half the size of his head.

3/4s his head?

Silver Knight
01-01-2011, 10:26 AM
What are the chances the costume gets leaked in some set pics?

terry78
01-01-2011, 10:40 AM
Spidey's eyes don't need to be half the size of his head.

Who started drawing him like that? Was it McFarlane? I think Marvel chose to go that route at some point to make him look less sinister.

Eggyman
01-01-2011, 11:24 AM
What are the chances the costume gets leaked in some set pics?

Probably not bad. But give them a couple of months to find their feet and we'll have a pro-mo shot. I remember when I first saw the Raimi Spidey suit in a local rag. I didn't have internet at the time. It was the one where he was crouched on the building, artist rendered, and I've seen it knocking about here not long ago. It was accurate to what we got. I think studios are more secretive now--about everything--because they're sore from things being revealed before they want them to be. But hopefully, they understand that a costume isn't a big thing to keep hidden and will grace us with some red and blue awesomeness soon enough.

I'm all for a bit of fuzzy spi-cam before that though.

Silver Knight
01-01-2011, 11:55 AM
Probably not bad. But give them a couple of months to find their feet and we'll have a pro-mo shot. I remember when I first saw the Raimi Spidey suit in a local rag. I didn't have internet at the time. It was the one where he was crouched on the building, artist rendered, and I've seen it knocking about here not long ago. It was accurate to what we got. I think studios are more secretive now--about everything--because they're sore from things being revealed before they want them to be. But hopefully, they understand that a costume isn't a big thing to keep hidden and will grace us with some red and blue awesomeness soon enough.

I'm all for a bit of fuzzy spi-cam before that though.
When do you think this will happen, March? April?

White_Knight191
01-01-2011, 12:19 PM
Who started drawing him like that? Was it McFarlane? I think Marvel chose to go that route at some point to make him look less sinister.

I think it was Alex Saviuk, McFarlane started drawing after him in ASM #298. Or am I wrong?

Eggyman
01-01-2011, 12:23 PM
When do you think this will happen, March? April?

Your guess is as good as mine, pal. Who knows with these Hollywood types?

NinjaCarm
01-01-2011, 12:27 PM
I think it was Alex Saviuk, McFarlane started drawing after him in ASM #298. Or am I wrong?

I loved Alex Saviuk's Web of Spider-Man run. He was actually close friends to the Romitas. Great stuff.
http://www.spiderfan.org/comics/images/spiderman_web/087.jpg

Pac-Master
01-01-2011, 12:27 PM
Maybe in about May or June. In July, they'll show footage, so I think there will probably be some time past from the first official pic of the suit to the footage. Kind of like Thor.

Silver Knight
01-01-2011, 12:34 PM
Probably not bad. But give them a couple of months to find their feet and we'll have a pro-mo shot. I remember when I first saw the Raimi Spidey suit in a local rag. I didn't have internet at the time. It was the one where he was crouched on the building, artist rendered, and I've seen it knocking about here not long ago. It was accurate to what we got. I think studios are more secretive now--about everything--because they're sore from things being revealed before they want them to be. But hopefully, they understand that a costume isn't a big thing to keep hidden and will grace us with some red and blue awesomeness soon enough.

I'm all for a bit of fuzzy spi-cam before that though.

Your guess is as good as mine, pal. Who knows with these Hollywood types?My guess is April 14th :)

socool
01-01-2011, 12:48 PM
I loved Alex Saviuk's Web of Spider-Man run. He was actually close friends to the Romitas. Great stuff.
http://www.spiderfan.org/comics/images/spiderman_web/087.jpg

Well, that definitely isn't the first picture of big-eye Spidey. But that very well be the same artist.

My guess is April 14th :)

Uh...do you know something we don't?

NinjaCarm
01-01-2011, 01:08 PM
Well, that definitely isn't the first picture of big-eye Spidey. But that very well be the same artist.



Uh...do you know something we don't?

Yes, I was pointing out the artist, Alex Saviuk.

Spider-Aziz
01-01-2011, 01:08 PM
Hmmm. Hard decision. But I must say, as much as I like the big eyes, I am a supporter of a comic costume so I must the smaller eyes win. What do you guys like better? Big or Small?I always preferred the smaller eyes

Aesop Rocks
01-01-2011, 01:21 PM
Hahahahahahhahaa Oh man, this is great:

costume department had to fix DAT BULDGE in Garfield's suit (http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/53872310.html)

roach
01-01-2011, 01:43 PM
goes to show what matters to hollywood..we are arguing about eyes and they spent hours on his bulge

Crockett
01-01-2011, 01:49 PM
:funny:

That's hilarious.

El Payaso
01-01-2011, 01:52 PM
It's been a long tradition since Burt Ward's Robin.

LuisTX85
01-01-2011, 01:56 PM
I hope"high tech design"don't mean like futuristic type of high tech.

roach
01-01-2011, 02:01 PM
probably means to fabric is made in a hi tech manner

socool
01-01-2011, 02:11 PM
I hope"high tech design"don't mean like futuristic type of high tech.

I think it means the fabric, not the design. From what it sounds, this movie isn't gonna change too much. It sounds pretty safe so far. I don't think we have to worry until the first photos and clips

Brian Braddock
01-01-2011, 02:57 PM
goes to show what matters to hollywood..we are arguing about eyes and they spent hours on his bulge

Almost the exact same story come out about Routh and his 'bulge' just before Superman Returns. I guess if you're the lead in one of these movies and you dont have a 'we had to conceal his big crotch' story imminating from the costume department, then its time to get a little insecure and work hard on that personality and sense of humour.

terry78
01-01-2011, 03:19 PM
So the crotch is to superheroes what the cleavage is to superheroines.

El Payaso
01-01-2011, 04:19 PM
I hope"high tech design"don't mean like futuristic type of high tech.

Yes. I'd rather it to be current high tech.

Chris Wallace
01-01-2011, 05:47 PM
I hope"high tech design"don't mean like futuristic type of high tech.

No Tron Spidey!

JustABill
01-02-2011, 04:04 AM
I feel like with every superhero we get now, there's always the obligatory ''Yeah, they had to conceal his bulge because it was so fricking big." We got it with Routh for Superman, we got it with Garfield now, I believe we also got it for someone else, but I could be mistaken.

Eggyman
01-02-2011, 04:46 AM
I feel like with every superhero we get now, there's always the obligatory ''Yeah, they had to conceal his bulge because it was so fricking big." We got it with Routh for Superman, we got it with Garfield now, I believe we also got it for someone else, but I could be mistaken.

We got it about ten years ago when they were trying to hide Tobey's vagina.

Octoberist
01-02-2011, 04:47 AM
awful :( :)

White_Knight191
01-02-2011, 05:18 AM
We got it about ten years ago when they were trying to hide Tobey's vagina.

:funny: :up:

Firm18
01-02-2011, 08:06 AM
We got it about ten years ago when they were trying to hide Tobey's vagina.

:woot:

I just realised it's been 10 years, wow.

spidey-dude
01-02-2011, 08:07 AM
Hahahahahahhahaa Oh man, this is great:

costume department had to fix DAT BULDGE in Garfield's suit (http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/53872310.html)

we really had to work really hard to hide it.....

"come on andrew take the socks out"

White_Knight191
01-02-2011, 08:16 AM
Hahahahahahhahaa Oh man, this is great:

costume department had to fix DAT BULDGE in Garfield's suit (http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/53872310.html)

:funny:

roach
01-02-2011, 08:19 AM
dude your spider-sac is showing

nogap87
01-02-2011, 03:56 PM
I feel like with every superhero we get now, there's always the obligatory ''Yeah, they had to conceal his bulge because it was so fricking big." We got it with Routh for Superman, we got it with Garfield now, I believe we also got it for someone else, but I could be mistaken.

Was there any concern with Dr. Manhattan showing his big blue shlong?

Brian Braddock
01-02-2011, 04:08 PM
We got it about ten years ago when they were trying to hide Tobey's vagina.

:woot:

Hurm...
01-02-2011, 05:02 PM
We got it about ten years ago when they were trying to hide Tobey's vagina.This comment made my day. LMAO:woot:

The Infernal
01-02-2011, 05:12 PM
Was there any concern with Dr. Manhattan showing his big blue shlong?

Only in regards to the cost of the cgi to put that thing on screen. :whatever:

Silver Knight
01-02-2011, 09:12 PM
Any new word on the "furturistic" costume?

Mace Bloodstone
01-03-2011, 12:19 AM
we will find out.... in the future.

:rimshot:

Ultimate Doom
01-03-2011, 12:31 AM
Lets be honest though, nobody wants spider-mans junk flashing in our faces

except some people i guess..

LegendaryCaleb
01-03-2011, 12:52 AM
3D junk in my face...heck yes!






jp.

Silver Knight
01-03-2011, 01:45 AM
3D junk in my face...heck yes!






jp.

Dude, your avatar is sweet. What comic is it from?

LegendaryCaleb
01-03-2011, 02:01 AM
thanks man!
a guy off deviantart made it!
so i cut it out and added some clouds behind it

The Infernal
01-03-2011, 04:06 AM
Any new word on the "furturistic" costume?

There's fur now?

we will find out.... in the future.


:rimshot:



Hold on. I've just got to make the last payment on my Delorean and then all our questions shall be answered... at least that's what a lifetime of watching movies have lead me to believe.

RustyCage
01-03-2011, 08:01 AM
thanks man!
a guy off deviantart made it!
so i cut it out and added some clouds behind it

Really tasteful editing. :up:

Silver Knight
01-03-2011, 08:16 AM
There's fur now?

Haha sorry dude, I cant spell.

thanks man!
a guy off deviantart made it!
so i cut it out and added some clouds behind it

Im lost..

RustyCage
01-03-2011, 09:20 AM
Im lost..

deviantART (http://deviantart.com) is a website where artists posts their works. That's where he found the picture, after which he edited it to have clouds in the background.

Silver Knight
01-03-2011, 10:01 AM
So its not a official Marvel pic? Its so beautiful.

socool
01-03-2011, 01:40 PM
So its not a official Marvel pic? Its so beautiful.

Here is the original picture.

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6229/3b57348e23e960ede30fc17.jpg

Eggyman
01-03-2011, 01:44 PM
It's amazing the amount of character that one picture gives to Spidey, and then you think of the maskless mute we sometimes had to endure.

Spider-Boy
01-03-2011, 02:10 PM
Here is the original picture.

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6229/3b57348e23e960ede30fc17.jpg

This is how Spidey should be portrayed, the suit is flawless. Rami's verison is too precise and too perfectly skiny tight to be designed and constructed by a high school student. This adds that touch of realism Rami's version lacked. Was his suit terrible, not by any means. It was perfect, but too perfect. This suit actually looks plausable.

chaseter
01-03-2011, 02:16 PM
Oh god here we go again about the suit realism.

LegendaryCaleb
01-03-2011, 02:45 PM
Really tasteful editing. :up:
thanks man :) i like your avy as well!
It's amazing the amount of character that one picture gives to Spidey, and then you think of the maskless mute we sometimes had to endure.
lol this is so dang true.
This is how Spidey should be portrayed, the suit is flawless. Rami's verison is too precise and too perfectly skiny tight to be designed and constructed by a high school student. This adds that touch of realism Rami's version lacked. Was his suit terrible, not by any means. It was perfect, but too perfect. This suit actually looks plausable.
id like a version of that suit...but add a lil bit more style like hobo123's manip recently...like it doesnt have to be skin tight necessarily...but if it has a lil bit more flair like the manip added...itd be an amazing suit and id prolly prefer it over raimis

Chris Wallace
01-03-2011, 03:16 PM
Oh god here we go again about the suit realism.:whatever:Indeed. I thought there was nothing left of that horse to beat.

Immortalfire
01-03-2011, 03:21 PM
Just when you think its dead, it jumps right back up.

Chris Wallace
01-03-2011, 03:22 PM
Aren't you supposed to shoot a horse when it does that?

The Infernal
01-03-2011, 03:23 PM
Just when you think its dead, it jumps right back up.

Zombies are the new Vampires it seems.

Immortalfire
01-03-2011, 03:33 PM
Aren't you supposed to shoot a horse when it does that?

Zombie horses can be difficult. Same for zombie discussions.

RustyCage
01-03-2011, 03:35 PM
Everyone's always going to have an opinion. One discussion about a topic coming to a relative close isn't going to end those opinions, or necessarily change anyone's mind - especially anyone who wasn't involved with said discussion. It's a forum, it happens.

Chris Wallace
01-03-2011, 05:10 PM
Zombie horses can be difficult. Same for zombie discussions.

Are these ROTLD zombies, where a bullet in the brain doesn't matter?

roach
01-03-2011, 05:14 PM
Nazi Zombie Horses

GoblinWhirlwind
01-03-2011, 05:30 PM
courtesy of hobo123

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5083/5309297910_653bc13935_z.jpg



I love this. The eyes, the webbing, and the colors are great :up:

Chris Wallace
01-03-2011, 05:31 PM
The question is, would it look good in motion?

PreK
01-03-2011, 05:34 PM
The suit isn't going to look any different in motion. :huh:

Ultimate Doom
01-03-2011, 05:43 PM
That looks so cool! I love how the spider-emblem arms flow right into the webbing

Octoberist
01-03-2011, 08:52 PM
Is it me, or despite all these suggestions and variations of the costume,THEY ALL look the pretty much the same?

Immortalfire
01-03-2011, 08:53 PM
My sources say the new Spidey costume will be glow in the dark, and it will include nipples on the front that shoot NEON webbing.

Octoberist
01-03-2011, 08:54 PM
NOW...That's WHATTA I'MA TALKIN' ABOUTA! :)

roach
01-03-2011, 10:22 PM
Is it me, or despite all these suggestions and variations of the costume,THEY ALL look the pretty much the same?

same to me too

Spider-Boy
01-03-2011, 11:11 PM
I love this. The eyes, the webbing, and the colors are great :up:


Eyes make the suit 100%. Not crazy about the vein webbing around the lower arms.

Chris Wallace
01-04-2011, 06:52 AM
Is it me, or despite all these suggestions and variations of the costume,THEY ALL look the pretty much the same?

There's only so much you an do. While the consensus is "make it different from the Raimi/Acheson suit", you can only go so far before it no longer looks like Spider-Man.

rcazzy
01-04-2011, 10:06 AM
Is it me, or despite all these suggestions and variations of the costume,THEY ALL look the pretty much the same?

All in the details and overall feel, really. I look at every little piece and pick out the bits I prefer visually then hopefully find or make a manip of what I imagine.

Ajendo
01-04-2011, 02:53 PM
:whatever:Indeed. I thought there was nothing left of that horse to beat.

Much like the majority of threads in this forum :whatever:

spider-neil
01-04-2011, 03:20 PM
Is it me, or despite all these suggestions and variations of the costume,THEY ALL look the pretty much the same?


you could argue the superman returns suit was 'technically the same' as the comic superman suit.

the suit was blue
the trunks, boots and cape was red
he had the big \S/

yet the suit was an absolute MESS

Chris Wallace
01-04-2011, 05:14 PM
To which I would say again, only so much you can do before you lose the integrity of the character's look.

Doctor Jones
01-04-2011, 07:54 PM
Indeed. people are going in expecting to see Spider-Man. There should be minor alterations. But just because it doesn't change much, doesn't mean it will look like and be the Raimi suit. Like Chris said, there's only so much you can do until it's not Spider-Man. It's like Superman.

SuperAl
01-04-2011, 08:23 PM
This is how Spidey should be portrayed, the suit is flawless. Rami's verison is too precise and too perfectly skiny tight to be designed and constructed by a high school student. This adds that touch of realism Rami's version lacked. Was his suit terrible, not by any means. It was perfect, but too perfect. This suit actually looks plausable.

they dont look that different besides there being no shine. i only think that pic looks better cuz spidey is skinny rather than having a normal build.

Chris Wallace
01-05-2011, 06:48 AM
I don't want Spidey looking emaciated.

roach
01-05-2011, 07:00 AM
you could argue the superman returns suit was 'technically the same' as the comic superman suit.

the suit was blue
the trunks, boots and cape was red
he had the big \S/

yet the suit was an absolute MESS

agreed..a minor change here and a minor changer there..after a while all those minor changes equal a big change

Chris Wallace
01-05-2011, 07:04 AM
With Superman Returns it seemed they forgot what the suit was supposed to convey. They took something that was intentionally big & bold and minimized it. My biggest worry with Spider-Man is that they might do as some fanboys suggest, & make the suit look cheap for the sake of "realism".

marvelman2006
01-05-2011, 07:24 AM
I cant see the costume looking like the previous one but more skinny and the webbing not so thick and pushed out.

spider-neil
01-05-2011, 07:47 AM
With Superman Returns it seemed they forgot what the suit was supposed to convey. They took something that was intentionally big & bold and minimized it. My biggest worry with Spider-Man is that they might do as some fanboys suggest, & make the suit look cheap for the sake of "realism".


I was expecting them to take the reeves suit and 'spidify' it. give the suit more depth with silk screen muscles and give the boots and cape a little more texture and that's it.

what singer did with it was a disgrace.

raimi knocked it out of the park with his spidey suit. if they made the suit exactly the same but with 'romita eyes', black webs and a big round spider on the back that would be perfect.

Chris Wallace
01-05-2011, 07:55 AM
I was expecting them to take the reeves suit and 'spidify' it. give the suit more depth with silk screen muscles and give the boots and cape a little more texture and that's it.



A lot of people did. I remember some fake "concept art" pics that were posted before the suit was revealed, which looked prety much like what you described. I knew they were fake because he was CLEARLY wearing Keaton's Batman belt, but a lot of people fell for it.

spider-neil
01-05-2011, 08:04 AM
A lot of people did. I remember some fake "concept art" pics that were posted before the suit was revealed, which looked prety much like what you described. I knew they were fake because he was CLEARLY wearing Keaton's Batman belt, but a lot of people fell for it.

the movie sucked but I think half the reason I hate SR so much is because I DESPISE the superman suit.

Eggyman
01-05-2011, 08:12 AM
Put a pig in a tutu and you've still got a pig.

El Payaso
01-05-2011, 10:07 AM
Put a pig in a tutu and you've still got a pig.

So, put Superman in a bad suit and you've still got Superman?

Eggyman
01-05-2011, 10:34 AM
So, put Superman in a bad suit and you've still got Superman?

Exactly. You've got Superman in a bad suit. It is what it is.

RealIrOnMaN
01-05-2011, 10:40 AM
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/8853/spidermanf.jpg

Chris Wallace
01-05-2011, 10:43 AM
Exactly. You've got Superman in a bad suit. It is what it is.

The suit just made Routh as visually unappealing as the movie was aesthetically unappealing.

RealIrOnMaN
01-05-2011, 10:44 AM
Too bad those ad/test shots are from 90's(

Chris Wallace
01-05-2011, 10:48 AM
WHat were they from? The ride?

Eggyman
01-05-2011, 10:48 AM
The suit just made Routh as visually unappealing as the movie was aesthetically unappealing.

I know. It's like they were making things harder for themselves. Hmmm, let's make him look dull.

RealIrOnMaN
01-05-2011, 10:50 AM
WHat were they from? The ride?
Eh((( Spider-Man Trade Ad, Marvel Entertainment, 1990.

And here I thought for a second that it was something new((

Eggyman
01-05-2011, 10:51 AM
What )))) is it with all the ((((?

RealIrOnMaN
01-05-2011, 10:52 AM
What )))) is it with all the ((((?
Well, to be fair, I though that were test shots of Andrew in costume, but as you see it turned out to be nothing but an old promotion for Marvel 90's stuff(

Eggyman
01-05-2011, 10:54 AM
No no no. All '))))' and '((((' in your posts?

Just wondering.

spider-neil
01-05-2011, 11:08 AM
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/8853/spidermanf.jpg

ISpider :awesome:

Spidey_62
01-05-2011, 05:01 PM
I've never seen those 90s shots, they are way cool.

Chris Wallace
01-05-2011, 05:09 PM
ISpider :awesome:

I knew somebody would say it.

El Payaso
01-05-2011, 08:46 PM
Exactly. You've got Superman in a bad suit. It is what it is.

"I'm still Supermaaaaaaaan."

ironwez20
01-06-2011, 08:40 AM
I allways thought if they put moving eyes on the movie version it would look dumb but i still would like to see them give it a try.

ironwez20
01-06-2011, 08:48 AM
edit

Chris Wallace
01-06-2011, 10:51 AM
I allways thought if they put moving eyes on the movie version it would look dumb but i still would like to see them give it a try.

I think it would be a horrible idea. Plus the only way they could do it is with a CGI mask, which I do not want to see.

chaseter
01-06-2011, 11:36 AM
I allways thought if they put moving eyes on the movie version it would look dumb but i still would like to see them give it a try.

No thanks.

Alex The Great
01-06-2011, 11:38 AM
I allways thought if they put moving eyes on the movie version it would look dumb but i still would like to see them give it a try.
Ugh. No Thanks :down

Spider-Boy
01-06-2011, 12:18 PM
I allways thought if they put moving eyes on the movie version it would look dumb but i still would like to see them give it a try.

Only works in the cartoons. However, you could pull off a "Scream" and change the masks according to the emotion of the character. "WHASSSUPPPPPPPPPPPPP?!"... Jokes, please don't spazz out.

Ajendo
01-06-2011, 12:25 PM
I allways thought if they put moving eyes on the movie version it would look dumb but i still would like to see them give it a try.

It doesn't make any sense for this to happen at all in the movies.

White_Knight191
01-06-2011, 01:32 PM
Based on what we know, I changed some things on Hobo's design. (Muscles, head, eyes, etc.) I kinda like this :p
[IMG]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7482/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg (http://img254.imageshack.us/i/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg/)

socool
01-06-2011, 01:41 PM
Based on what we know, I changed some things on Hobo's design. (Muscles, head, eyes, etc.) I kinda like this :p
[IMG]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7482/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg (http://img254.imageshack.us/i/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg/)

:wow:

White Knight's body+Hobo's design=EPIC WIN!!!

Seriously, that is EXACTLY how I want Spidey to look...now I'm gonna be depressed when the suit doesn't look like this :csad:

Ajendo
01-06-2011, 01:47 PM
Based on what we know, I changed some things on Hobo's design. (Muscles, head, eyes, etc.) I kinda like this :p
[IMG]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7482/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg (http://img254.imageshack.us/i/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg/)

Perfect!

White_Knight191
01-06-2011, 02:59 PM
^^ I'm glad you guys like it :) But you should thank Hobo for this, wich I certainly do ;)

RustyCage
01-06-2011, 03:42 PM
I see him being skinnier than that, but I still like it.

Although, I kinda wish the spider's legs were more visible.

RustyCage
01-06-2011, 03:42 PM
Edit: Double.

craigdbfan
01-06-2011, 05:32 PM
If they do end up changing it a bit, I hope its something along these lines (including the black glare along the dark blue with some post CGI):

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080208022145/marveldatabase/images/thumb/3/32/Peter_Parker_%28Earth-616%29.jpg/345px-Peter_Parker_%28Earth-616%29.jpg

Spideyfan93
01-06-2011, 06:45 PM
http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/mondeau2/spiderman.jpg

I would kill to see something resembling the Alex Ross drawings. One of my favorite artists ever.

Silver Knight
01-06-2011, 06:49 PM
Everyday I wake up I hope so see s set pic with the costume.

roach
01-06-2011, 06:55 PM
Based on what we know, I changed some things on Hobo's design. (Muscles, head, eyes, etc.) I kinda like this :p
[IMG]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7482/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg (http://img254.imageshack.us/i/5309297910653bc13935b22.jpg/)

its ok I just wish the spider was a bit more prominent...not raised but not almost blending in with the webbing

LegendaryCaleb
01-07-2011, 12:16 AM
I see him being skinnier than that, but I still like it.

Although, I kinda wish the spider's legs were more visible.
the forearms look like crap cause i did this very quickly but i went and looked at a pic of andrew garfield and this is how it would look (head size is the same due to hair)
also i removed the gigantic neck area cause youd need to be buff to have that
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5430/skinny.png

White_Knight191
01-07-2011, 04:31 AM
^^ Now that's beter :)

Eggyman
01-07-2011, 04:45 AM
Perfect :heart:

Silver Knight
01-07-2011, 05:16 AM
the forearms look like crap cause i did this very quickly but i went and looked at a pic of andrew garfield and this is how it would look (head size is the same due to hair)
also i removed the gigantic neck area cause youd need to be buff to have that
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5430/skinny.png

Looks good.

RustyCage
01-07-2011, 08:28 AM
Awesome, Caleb! :) That's way closer to what I had in mind. The neck change does wonders, looks a lot more like Andrew.

White_Knight191
01-07-2011, 10:23 AM
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5953/naamloos1222.jpg

:awesome:

White_Knight191
01-07-2011, 10:23 AM
edit

White_Knight191
01-07-2011, 10:25 AM
edit, wow triple post :D

Spider-Who?
01-07-2011, 10:29 AM
i can dig this design (not the tooth pick body though). Only thing I would change would be how the red comes down his bicep. I think it needs to come forward more. Nice work to whoever original painted the image.

LegendaryCaleb
01-07-2011, 03:25 PM
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5953/naamloos1222.jpg

:awesome:
i lol'd pretty hard :awesome::awesome:

terry78
01-07-2011, 03:31 PM
Have they announced a costume designer for this one yet?

Never mind, I just saw it's Kym Barrett on IMDB. She worked on all the Matrix flicks, From Hell, Speed Racer, and Green Hornet is her most recent one.

gdw
01-07-2011, 03:32 PM
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/8853/spidermanf.jpg

Where's that from?

Spider-Who?
01-07-2011, 03:35 PM
Have they announced a costume designer for this one yet?

Never mind, I just saw it's Kym Barrett on IMDB. She worked on all the Matrix flicks, From Hell, Speed Racer, and Green Hornet is her most recent one.
....so nothing truly inspiring...

Chris Wallace
01-07-2011, 03:37 PM
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5953/naamloos1222.jpg

:awesome:

Powers...failing...need...sandwich!

socool
01-07-2011, 04:36 PM
....so nothing truly inspiring...

The Matrix wasn't a work of art?

Spideyfan93
01-07-2011, 04:38 PM
Ahhh the skinny! Skinny Spidey!

Chris Wallace
01-07-2011, 04:56 PM
The Matrix wasn't a work of art?

Not costume-wise it wasn't.

Ajendo
01-07-2011, 05:03 PM
Morpheus' shades kicked more ass than Neo did.

Mace Bloodstone
01-07-2011, 05:05 PM
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5953/naamloos1222.jpg

:awesome:


Close Encounters of the Spider Kind

Spideyfan93
01-07-2011, 05:05 PM
When people wear dark sun glasses, black ones, people always refer to Matrix and MIB. It was influential on culture.

Chris Wallace
01-07-2011, 05:08 PM
Everyday I wake up I hope so see s set pic with the costume.

Sony is going to withhold that for as long as possible. And there won't be any sneaking pics out the back door like they did with the Green Goblin. Not this time. My prediction is Entertainment Weekly will debut the first image & we won't even be able to thoroughly see the costume.

©KAW
01-07-2011, 05:23 PM
I thought the costumes in The Matrix were great, fit the film to a Tee. But those were mostly fashion type designs. It's different with a 50 year old character who has an iconic costume. Spider-Man's suit is so unique that it's hard to change something without it being noticed. It's like the eyes know where every line goes. That's why it's best to keep it classic. A few tweaks here and there and be on your way.

NinjaCarm
01-07-2011, 05:51 PM
http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/234/anjinanhutspidermancost.jpg

I still love this.

Spider-Aziz
01-07-2011, 06:40 PM
http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/234/anjinanhutspidermancost.jpgEewww
I was really joking about using the same costume style used for DareDevil

craigdbfan
01-07-2011, 06:47 PM
The Amazing Spider-Ass.

Silver Knight
01-07-2011, 08:18 PM
Guys we will be getting something hi-tech remember.

superkong 500
01-07-2011, 09:25 PM
Actually I wonder what kind of material will be used for the suit. I guess when they say hi tech they mean the texture or material been used for the suit.

But I just can't wrap my head around the idea of the suit looking different from the raimi films. That suit was pretty much perfect, if anything they could mess it up. i hope not, I will be really amazed if they come up with something even better. The only changes I would like design wise would be black webbing on the suit(instead of silver/greyish) and maybe slightly more menacing looking lenses, but even the lenses may be pushing it, depending on how they approach it.

craigdbfan
01-07-2011, 10:07 PM
I'm hoping they go with a mixture of an actual costume using spandex/lycra as well as post production CGI to mess with color and shading.

I'm hoping they go with the more classical look including the eyes which can be more rounded out. Still use lenses but change the shape of the eye along with the black outline, they can also make the actual lens white and not some off white or gray. More organic and round and less angular like the Raimi films. Again the costume from the first Spider-Man films was close to perfect already. It doesn't mean that we can't get another great authentic and faithful interpretation.

Here's what I'm hoping they go for:

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080208022145/marveldatabase/images/thumb/3/32/Peter_Parker_%28Earth-616%29.jpg/345px-Peter_Parker_%28Earth-616%29.jpg

http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/AmazingFantasy15.jpg

Doctor Who
01-08-2011, 12:31 AM
I still love this.

I like the webbing style, but I'm not sure about the zippers. *ponders* Well not so much the zippers, but the fingerless glove look mostly; otherwise, I think it's pretty solid. Maybe loose the gloves to normal long gloves, more discreet zipper, and maybe make the blue a tiny bit darke; should be good to go after that. Oh, and Spidey always needs the spider logo on the chest. :word:

White_Knight191
01-08-2011, 06:07 AM
i lol'd pretty hard :awesome::awesome:
Powers...failing...need...sandwich!

Haha lol :funny:

Immortalfire
01-08-2011, 06:52 AM
http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/234/anjinanhutspidermancost.jpg

WTF :huh::huh::huh:

roach
01-08-2011, 06:59 AM
Extreme sports Spiderman...comes with surfboard, skateboard and base jumping set

terry78
01-08-2011, 08:46 AM
Extreme sports Spiderman...comes with surfboard, skateboard and base jumping set

I suspect they may have actually released that back in the day. He had a car for ****'s sake.

NinjaCarm
01-08-2011, 09:18 AM
WTF :huh::huh::huh:

I don't understand the "WTF" mentality approach to this design, for a real world look and style this is simply perfect instead of a costume without seems which doesn't make sense. It maintains the integrity of the original Spider-Man costume quite well without overbearing the eye with a "sports" approach, only slight. It looks as though someone would have made it in the real world and believable. This is perfect for this style reboot, IMO.

'Nuff Said.

Doctor Jones
01-08-2011, 10:06 AM
We haven't really seen much to indicate what "style" this reboot will go in.

I don't get the whole "This looks like it could be made in the real world instead of s costume that doesn't make sense" mentality. What about the costume wouldn't make sense? Or maybe I'm taking it the wrong way. Because the zippers could be an indication of what you're saying or that it would be believable that Peter could make it himself. It really doesn't make sense at all. When making a costume for the real world, it's about making it have dimension and not to make it look too silly because the comic is a drawing, so some aesthetics like fabric will be different. But if it's something like Spider-Man, it shoudn't be too complex. His suit is a very simple design and it's not hard to **** it up unless you're really trying. And the zippers and the padded look makes that so. I'm fine with the rest of the suit. Spider-Man isn't hard to bring into the real world, but the stuff like the zippers and gloves are going too far. What the hell is the point of putting them there? We don't care how he made it or how he puts it on. What matters is how it looks and if it looks good.

Spider-ManHero12
01-08-2011, 10:13 AM
We haven't really seen much to indicate what "style" this reboot will go in.

I don't get the whole "This looks like it could be made in the real world instead of s costume that doesn't make sense" mentality. What about the costume wouldn't make sense? Or maybe I'm taking it the wrong way. Because the zippers could be an indication of what you're saying or that it would be believable that Peter could make it himself. It really doesn't make sense at all. When making a costume for the real world, it's about making it have dimension and not to make it look too silly because the comic is a drawing, so some aesthetics like fabric will be different. But if it's something like Spider-Man, it shoudn't be too complex. His suit is a very simple design and it's not hard to **** it up unless you're really trying. And the zippers and the padded look makes that so. I'm fine with the rest of the suit. Spider-Man isn't hard to bring into the real world, but the stuff like the zippers and gloves are going too far. What the hell is the point of putting them there? We don't care how he made it or how he puts it on. What matters is how it looks and if it looks good. Agreed. the zippers look stupid as all hell. This isn't Batman, for christ sake, and That's one of the reasons I'm so sick of hearing the term "real". For god's sake, he's a guy that can crawl on walls.

Silver Knight
01-08-2011, 10:14 AM
I want webs under the arms.

craigdbfan
01-08-2011, 10:24 AM
I don't understand the "WTF" mentality approach to this design, for a real world look and style this is simply perfect instead of a costume without seems which doesn't make sense. It maintains the integrity of the original Spider-Man costume quite well without overbearing the eye with a "sports" approach, only slight. It looks as though someone would have made it in the real world and believable. This is perfect for this style reboot, IMO.

'Nuff Said.

Is it really that hard to not understand why someone would be repelled by that costume?

Might have something to do with the costume used in the Raimi series, whether you like the movies or not it was one of the best, if not the best costume design both in concept and execution in superhero movie history. Ask anyone and they'll tell you it was one of the much better handled approaches to an iconic superhero's costume on film.

It was faithful, sleek, and magical seeing it in action. It was everything a Spider-Man fan could have asked for visually wise. That Action UltraMax Spider-Man bootleg made in unknown country design is repulsive and stomps on the integrity of Spider-Man if anything.

I can completely understand why someone would get a "WTF!?" reaction if that were actually what they were going for. Which I'm most certain they aren't, if "modern" or "high tech" was ever mentioned they probably mean that the costume design team along with Sony Imageworks are going about approaching the costume in terms of material and possible CGI to assist in color/shading.

People need a reminder every now and then on how great the Raimi costume was:

http://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/spider-man-2_l.jpg

I'm sure Webb is a smart guy and will stay faithful and will only enhance or just go with a different style variant's from the plethora of costume design from the comics.

Using Raimi's design and the stronger designs from the comics as a base is the smart approach.

I want webs under the arms.

I'd love if they did that. It isn't a must but Sony Imagework has actually been getting much better in recent years I believe they could pull it off.

Spider-ManHero12
01-08-2011, 10:26 AM
^^ Great post! :up:

NinjaCarm
01-08-2011, 10:38 AM
I still don't agree and believe it's the way to go. Great costume, whomever worked on it.:up:

socool
01-08-2011, 10:45 AM
I still don't agree and believe it's the way to go. Great costume, whomever worked on it.:up:

This is almost unbelievable. Based on your other posts, I would have thought this is what you WOULD NOT have wanted.

I'm amazed.

NinjaCarm
01-08-2011, 10:46 AM
We haven't really seen much to indicate what "style" this reboot will go in.

I don't get the whole "This looks like it could be made in the real world instead of s costume that doesn't make sense" mentality. What about the costume wouldn't make sense? Or maybe I'm taking it the wrong way. Because the zippers could be an indication of what you're saying or that it would be believable that Peter could make it himself. It really doesn't make sense at all. When making a costume for the real world, it's about making it have dimension and not to make it look too silly because the comic is a drawing, so some aesthetics like fabric will be different. But if it's something like Spider-Man, it shoudn't be too complex. His suit is a very simple design and it's not hard to **** it up unless you're really trying. And the zippers and the padded look makes that so. I'm fine with the rest of the suit. Spider-Man isn't hard to bring into the real world, but the stuff like the zippers and gloves are going too far. What the hell is the point of putting them there? We don't care how he made it or how he puts it on. What matters is how it looks and if it looks good.

"Style" as in different, adding a sense of "real world grittyness" does not mean suspending the fact that there are "out of this world" elements still part of it, which I never said.

Differentiate, think out of the box.

NinjaCarm
01-08-2011, 10:47 AM
This is almost unbelievable. Based on your other posts, I would have thought this is what you WOULD NOT have wanted.

I'm amazed.

You got me all wrong then. Don't assume.

socool
01-08-2011, 10:48 AM
You got me all wrong then. Don't assume.

What's wrong with assuming? :dry:

Spider-ManHero12
01-08-2011, 10:49 AM
"Style" as in different, adding a sense of "real world grittyness" does not mean suspending the fact that there are "out of this world" elements still part of it, which I never said.

Differentiate, think out of the box. A Zipper wouldn't make the costume look good or gritty (which.......*sigh*......nevermind), It would make it look cheap and stupid, IMO.

craigdbfan
01-08-2011, 10:50 AM
"Style" as in different, adding a sense of "real world grittyness" does not mean suspending the fact that there are "out of this world" elements still part of it, which I never said.

Differentiate, think out of the box.

How is adding grittiness to Spider-Man thinking outside of the box when its become the norm in Hollywood to "grittitize" everything that needs refurbishing?

Come on man.

Anyway I'm glad thats not the vibe I'm getting from Webb or this production in general. I see them embracing the more tradition visual aspects of the Spider-Man franchise if Gwen Stacy's so far spot on representation is anything to go by. Webb's admiration of Raimi's costume and love for the original Ditko/Lee run also imply that we are going to get something relatively faithful in design.

Spider-ManHero12
01-08-2011, 10:52 AM
How is adding grittiness to Spider-Man thinking outside of the box when its become the norm in Hollywood to "grittitize" everything that needs refurbishing?

Come on man. I couldn't agree more. :up:

Though, I wouldn't call it "grittitize".

I'd call it "Nolanize". :whatever:

RustyCage
01-08-2011, 10:54 AM
I always thought the Raimi costume looked really stiff and restrictive, made Spidey's poses and moves somewhat awkward when he wasn't CG.

NinjaCarm
01-08-2011, 10:57 AM
How is adding grittiness to Spider-Man thinking outside of the box when its become the norm in Hollywood to "grittitize" everything that needs refurbishing?

Come on man.

Anyway I'm glad thats not the vibe I'm getting from Webb or this production in general. I see them embracing the more tradition visual aspects of the Spider-Man franchise if Gwen Stacy's so far spot on representation is anything to go by. Webb's admiration of Raimi's costume and love for the original Ditko/Lee run also imply that we are going to get something relatively faithful in design.

You simply have to add a sense on not insulting the intelligence of the audience, which I saw way too much of in the prior trilogy.

I always reference the first TMNT film from 1990. Very little cheese, a lot of grit, and one hell of a good movie and a great interpretation of the comic it was based on. It still holds up extremely well, given the references of the times of course.

IMO, I want this quality for Spider-Man. I'm tired of cheese. Period. Period. Period. Period. Period. PERIOD. I don't wanna see Spider-Man cruising thru the night hanging people and slicing their necks and everyone running around cursing and wearing scars and anything Frank Miller-esque. It's the simple task of NOT INSULTING MY INTELLIGENCE with contrived acting and gags.

Yeah, I would tone down the zippers a bit on that costume, but I still say it's brilliant. Ok? I love it. It took some conscious thought, some observation to come up with that. I love it.

craigdbfan
01-08-2011, 10:57 AM
I always thought the Raimi costume looked really stiff and restrictive, made Spidey's poses and moves somewhat awkward when he wasn't CG.

Those are the places were Webb and Sony Imagework have a chance to improve on.

That's why a mixture of CGI/motion capture with a real costume is the way to go. CGI can easily create cresses at the neck to help the overall movement of the costume. We are in a time where that form of vfx illusion is becoming the most believable.

craigdbfan
01-08-2011, 11:04 AM
You simply have to add a sense on not insulting the intelligence of the audience, which I saw way too much of in the prior trilogy.

I always reference the first TMNT film from 1990. Very little cheese, a lot of grit, and one hell of a good movie and a great interpretation of the comic it was based on. It still holds up extremely well, given the references of the times of course.

IMO, I want this quality for Spider-Man. I'm tired of cheese. Period. Period. Period. Period. Period. PERIOD.

Yeah, I would tone down the zippers a bit on that costume, but I still say it's brilliant. Ok? I love it. It took some conscious thought, some observation to come up with that. I love it.

Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy was cheesier than the first TMNT film, huh?

Interesting. I don't even really know how to respond to that.

You simply have to add a sense on not insulting the intelligence of the audience, which I saw way too much of in the prior trilogy.

Adding zippers and grittiness and real life practicality and basically butchering the Spider-Man costume design that was pulled off as close to perfection in its first cinematic attempt would be undermining everyone's ability to use their imagination to suspend disbelief.

That's what I find insulting.

NinjaCarm
01-08-2011, 11:05 AM
Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy was cheesier than the first TMNT film, huh?

Interesting. I don't even really know how to respond to that.



Adding zippers and grittiness and real life practicality and basically butchering the Spider-Man costume design that was pulled off as close to perfection in its first cinematic attempt would be undermining everyone's ability to use their imagination to suspend disbelief.

That's what I find insulting.


Find a way and get back to me. Because I stand my ground on that statement 1000%. The first TMNT film is grossly underrated, was WAY less cheesier than Raimi's Spider-Man. No clever comeback or statement you ever write will change my mind. You can probably take a survey or people who saw both films and I bet you it come out that TMNT was less "cheesier".

Spider-ManHero12
01-08-2011, 11:07 AM
The first TMNT film is grossly underrated, was WAY less cheesier than Raimi's Spider-Man. 1000%. :dry::doh::dry: I don't know how to respond, man. It's your opinion, and I understand that, but.......my god.

Spider-ManHero12
01-08-2011, 11:09 AM
Find a way and get back to me. Because I stand my ground on that statement 1000%. The first TMNT film is grossly underrated, was WAY less cheesier than Raimi's Spider-Man. No clever comeback or statement you ever write will change my mind. You can probably take a survey or people who saw both films and I bet you it come out that TMNT was less "cheesier". How the hell is TMNT gritty? And you're comparing it to the Spider-Man films?! *leaves thread*

craigdbfan
01-08-2011, 11:11 AM
:dry::doh::dry:

How the hell is TMNT gritty?! And you're comparing it to the Spider-Man films?! *leaves thread*

I'm equally at a loss for words.

Ajendo
01-08-2011, 11:14 AM
What's wrong with assuming? :dry:

You make an ass out of yourself by assuming, is what I was brought up on.

Anyway, there's no need to reinvent the wheel. Spidey's costume is so basic and simplistic in design that there are numerous ways to vary the look of the costume without compromising the overall aesthetic, iconic look as evidenced over the last 49 years.

Raimi's costume was fantastic and a proud adaptation of the costume, however, just because this is a reboot the costume doesn't need some radical change just for the sake of change. Just compare various artists' takes at drawing spidey, they're all the same but simultaneously different.

http://www.samruby.com/AmazingSpider-ManD/Large/AmazingSpider-Man389.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_v9MVLMG--mg/SwtGS3-O9xI/AAAAAAAAAXw/vYMegJ0_9D8/s1600/asm610.JPG

http://i.newsarama.com/images/ASM593_cov.jpg

http://i.livescience.com/images/spidey-gauntlet-02.jpg

http://www.spyder-25.com/covers/mkspiderman/MKSM_10.jpg