WB Superman Reboot 3.0: Christopher Nolan Edition

[gillberg2k1]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.

[batman44]

Hooray for gillberg2k1!! Thanks for the info:up:

[Karelia]

Awesome news! Where did you hear that? Or are you not allowed to say?

Either way, can't wait!

[Octoberist]

does Gillberg work in the industry?

[dark_b]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.yeah this would happen no matter what in 2010.he he :awesome:


i guess the reason you didnt mention the month is because ......

right ? :cwink:

[batman44]

gillberg2k1 has been reliable/trustworthy in the past.

[Octoberist]

Well if that's the case, I can't wait. I read some of his past posts and he sound legit.

I hope it's gonna happen this month. It sounds like happen at any moment now..haha.

[Alonsovich]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.

The TRIAD is back! :o

[treeringralph]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.

Did you hear when "much sooner than later" might be?

[Octoberist]

God, it's kiiiillllling me!

[treeringralph]

I hope it's gonna happen this month. It sounds like happen at any moment now..haha.

DragonCon is this (Labor Day) weekend in Atlanta...

...with Brandon Routh in attendance.

[X Knight]

could it be??? a shiny glimmer of hope???!!!

[hippie_hunter]

DragonCon is this (Labor Day) weekend in Atlanta...

...with Brandon Routh in attendance.
I really doubt that WB would use DragonCon to do Batman/Superman announcements.

[Octoberist]

I doubt it too.

[treeringralph]

I really doubt that WB would use DragonCon to do Batman/Superman announcements.

The emphasis was really more on the "Labor Day Weekend" portion of the comment.

and then I thought about DragonCon.

Nobody knows anything, so why not dream?

[Karelia]

I have a question... Who is picking the actor; WB or Nolan? Or is it not known yet?

[Kal-El Fan]

Do you think they'd say something during or around NYCC? Just 35 days left for that.

[solidsnake86]

I think you guys need to get announcements happening at these cons out of your head. 90% of the time it's released in the trades or deadline Hollywood will get the story. Beyond that Latino review is another site. Gillberk is reliable, I remember pre batman begins. Either way sooner hopefully means this month.

[Man of Tomorrow]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.


Casting for Superman already?


Hmmm....

[XxDelta09xX]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.

Can't wait!!!:wow:

[7heBoss]

I think you guys need to get announcements happening at these cons out of your head. 90% of the time it's released in the trades or deadline Hollywood will get the story. Beyond that Latino review is another site. Gillberk is reliable, I remember pre batman begins. Either way sooner hopefully means this month.

I hoping more by the end of this week *fingers crossed*
hey a guy can dream, im getting impatient

[TheScarecrow]

I have a question... Who is picking the actor; WB or Nolan? Or is it not known yet?

Read again, it's Batman casting not Superman casting. I doubt Nolan would pick a Superman actor when he's not director - he wouldn't like a producer doing that to him, and I can't see him doing it to anyone else.

[howl]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.

hells yeeeeh :D

[Kal-El Fan]

I think you guys need to get announcements happening at these cons out of your head. 90% of the time it's released in the trades or deadline Hollywood will get the story. Beyond that Latino review is another site. Gillberk is reliable, I remember pre batman begins. Either way sooner hopefully means this month.
During or AROUND!!! Yes they break the news in the trades, sometimes before an event, to get people more interested in their panels. It's all about marketing. They lure people in with the promise of news and usually don't deliver, but the people still come out in droves. Sometimes they deliver, like the Avengers panel at SDCC or when Singer released SR footage, etc. Just thinking about the buzz factor.

All of this is moot if the rumor of a pending announcement is BS.

[Showtime]

All of this is moot if the rumor of a pending announcement is BS.

I mean...well of course there is going to be an announcement. An announcement coming soon isn't necessarily front page news.

It's one of those things, "sooner or later" than what?

Ahh the dance. The dance is fret with stepping on their one's own feet.

[BH/HHH]

I hope we hear something about Superman soon, I'm almost starting to think its not gonna be made.

[RachelDawes]

I hope we hear something about Superman soon, I'm almost starting to think its not gonna be made.

Gillberg has restored my confidence. I believe this movie will be made and we'll get some news on it soon. :up:

[maenalus]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.

Before year's end I trust.

[Octoberist]

I think it's before that.

[treeringralph]

I think it's before that.

Why? Because you hope it's before the end of the year?

[MAN O STEEL]

Why? Because you hope it's before the end of the year?


Read below & count how many months are left in the year & then put 2 & 2 together pal

much sooner than later.



Steve

[gillberg2k1]

Just to clear the air, casting would be for Batman. Superman, from what I understand would be just a date, a title, and a director. That's their goal.

I can't give you a definite timeframe of when it's coming, because frankly, they didn't give me one. All I was told was that that they are hoping to have something concrete to piggy back on with the Batman press, as Nolan will be involved with both. The studio is pushing to get things rolling and have something via the trades "much sooner rather than later." I can only assume that this means the pieces aren't completely in place as of yet.

Again, this is just what I heard, I'm not taking any of it as gospel, but usually, these are the people that would know.

[sf2]

thanks. though it,s nothing much.

[echostation]

be greatful to the pilgrims of gilbert that he has made in due hest to seek us this great news... let us not be wallowing in self suffering and pity, we pine for the news, we shall receive... let us just wait the wait and do the talk the talk... in Ilahi's name and rahi's kashti... we will get the info we need about this film

The canceleation of the project would bring grave harm as Superman still has not been done proper justice on the biggest screen - all hte past ones ohave been love stories and are dates... now we need quantum global action sethu to really show special effects and fighting skill of the Superman....

[GreenKToo]

Me thinks thy watch the Madmax too much.

[Showtime]

be greatful to the pilgrims of gilbert that he has made in due hest to seek us this great news... let us not be wallowing in self suffering and pity, we pine for the news, we shall receive... let us just wait the wait and do the talk the talk... in Ilahi's name and rahi's kashti... we will get the info we need about this film

The canceleation of the project would bring grave harm as Superman still has not been done proper justice on the biggest screen - all hte past ones ohave been love stories and are dates... now we need quantum global action sethu to really show special effects and fighting skill of the Superman....

I remember my first beer.

[Rust]

Just to clear the air, casting would be for Batman. Superman, from what I understand would be just a date, a title, and a director. That's their goal.


Which is perfectly acceptable! The reveal of the title and the director is tops, but it'll make my year even more to learn that it's officially moving forward.

[GreenKToo]

Well, it looks like the spidey reboot will start filming in Dec. Nobody can accuse W.B. of rushing their films tho, no siree bob.:whatever:

[solidsnake86]

The thing with superman is that all they could really announce at this point is a director, which are they even looking at directors? or have they settled on J-Nolan, because if they have it would make more sense on why we haven't heard anything. Same with batman, there are a lot more things that have to be done then casting and that series is in a place where I doubt many people will be turning it down like they did before.

[Dark Knight]

Just wanted to pass on what I've heard... Warner Bros plan on announcing some details for both Batman and Superman together, much sooner than later. I'd expect to hear a title for Batman, Nolan's return officially confirmed with a brief synopsis along with some casting, along with an official title/date for Superman and of course, an official director announcement.






Didn't Jett say the samething with the "sooner rather than later" stuff? :woot:

[echostation]

I can almost guarantee you that Gilbert's news might be false...

[gillberg2k1]

Didn't Jett say the samething with the "sooner rather than later" stuff? :woot:

I'm not surprised. Bill's still got a decent track record, and we have definitely shared sources in the past... some... odd ones to say the least. I don't actively pursue this stuff anymore, but I can safely say, most of the people that have access to the good stuff... Stuff you guys go nuts over, are some weird, weird people. Never have I met stranger people than those in the film business. Regardless, when I do get those random emails or contact, I like to throw it out there and keep things interesting around here for you guys, as I had a really great time here pre-Begins and I like contributing when I can.

One day, when the Nolan films are all long wrapped and nobody's job security will be at stake, I'll share some really great stories from the Begins days. (I.E. Anyone remember "FrankenBat"? Yeah... that was a real hoot.)

Regardless, if it will make everyone happy, I'll just lie and say that there will be something official in...say... October. Does that work with everyone's schedules?

[batman44]

FrankenBat!!!...now that brings back some memories. Goodtimes.

[RachelDawes]

I can almost guarantee you that Gilbert's news might be false...

:csad:

[Octoberist]

i can't 'read' echostation sometimes, so I wouldn't say that his response is gospel either.

[gillberg2k1]

I can't exactly 'read' echostation either because there's nothing to read... "I can ALMOST guarantee that the news MIGHT be false." Are you serious? What does that even mean? I can also almost guarantee that many things MIGHT happen. There's no risk involved in guaranteeing a MIGHT. He can also ALMOST guarantee that my name MIGHT be Gilbert instead of Gillberg...

Regardless, I don't know echostations background or what he's scooped on in the past. He may be right. Heck, he can ALMOST guarantee a MAYBE, right?

Keep in mind that different parts or divisions of studios may hear or be told different things at different times. The inner workings are all politics, regardless. Someone pushing a certain agenda may say one thing, while another may say something totally different.

Again, just thought I'd throw this out there in case it was of interest.

[The Batman]

i dont particulary care to 'read' him if hes gonna say supes has never been done justice on the big screen.

Its called Superman: The Move. Remember that? Created the template for modern comic films? Not to mention its sequel.

Seriously, the Donner bashing is more than a little sad.

[Showtime]

What is the argument even about here?

Somebody said there will be news "much sooner than later", somebody else says they can "guarantee this might be false."

Of course there is going to be news sooner rather than later, there has to be if these movies are going to get going. Of course this might be false, because it could be later rather than sooner.

What? Huh? Um.

We already know that WB was gunning for December 2012 the last we heard, most likely due to the red tape related to the ongoing lawsuit. I would imagine the title of the next Superman flick will be some derivative of 'The Man of Steel"..."Superman: Man of Steel", "Man of Steel",...something...anything.

Wake me up later.

[The Sage]

I'm not surprised. Bill's still got a decent track record, and we have definitely shared sources in the past... some... odd ones to say the least. I don't actively pursue this stuff anymore, but I can safely say, most of the people that have access to the good stuff... Stuff you guys go nuts over, are some weird, weird people. Never have I met stranger people than those in the film business. Regardless, when I do get those random emails or contact, I like to throw it out there and keep things interesting around here for you guys, as I had a really great time here pre-Begins and I like contributing when I can.

One day, when the Nolan films are all long wrapped and nobody's job security will be at stake, I'll share some really great stories from the Begins days. (I.E. Anyone remember "FrankenBat"? Yeah... that was a real hoot.)

Regardless, if it will make everyone happy, I'll just lie and say that there will be something official in...say... October. Does that work with everyone's schedules?

Ah yes, the good old days. Can't wait for them to start up again. :awesome:

[dark_b]

the worst time was from 2006 to 2009. it was bad to found out that there wont be a superman for years.

now its not so bad anymore. i got over the fact that tehy made some mistakes in 2006. and now maybe we have luck and get it in 2012.

i guess it could be worse .

[Superman2007]

I think some sort of info will come out out in October.

Singer was announced in October '04 for the release in June '06.

Just pure random guessing on my part though.

[Octoberist]

My theory is that maybe the Superman news is holding back the Batman 3 news.

This is pure speculation, but I think the Batman 3 stuff is a done deal, but Nolan is just waiting on Superman (working out the contracts, director etc) so they can announce them both at the same time.

[Superman2007]

I was listening to an old interview with Jonah Nolan that he gave during the release of The Prestige(great interview that can be heard here: http://c4.libsyn.com/media/18606/ThePrestigeQandA.mp3?nvb=20100909205640&nva=20100910210640&sid=0ca8442cedeb482430e58ea466546f83&l_sid=18606&l_eid=&l_mid=1642421&t=019a89c6d1ef8a389bd78)...

He's asked if he's ever considered directing and this was his answer:

"I think in terms of the directing thing, like I said I grew up with my brother as the film director so it never really felt like an option to me and certainly I don't have the kind of single-mindedness about it that Chris does. I still feel like I have a lot to learn about writing, someone asked me about this earlier this week and I was saying that if you hang in there and you have enough luck as a screenwriter eventually they will give you a chance to make a fool out of yourself by directing a film...and I fully hope to take advantage of that...but I got some work to do first"

I know Showtime and FilmNerdJamie broke this possibility a while ago, I just thought it was an interesting quote from him that shows he had this in mind as early as 2006.

[Octoberist]

I read the following from the play list:

We've heard a lot of 'Superman' rumors of late, but none we felt confident enough to print (not yet anyhow). The one thing is clear. The film is in flux, decision-wise, and things that might have been a potential gameplan a few months ago, are no longer the case.

It sounda little ominous and the playlist's track record is questionable, despite being a pretty good site. So is the last sentence an assumption due to the lack of news, or based on something they heard?

read the rest here:

http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2010/09/jj-abrams-jonathan-nolan-teaming-up-for.html

[Excel]

Ben Affleck will direct.

[Octoberist]

i don't know if you were suppose to be joking but...that's not a bad idea..

[akfj]

i don't know if you were suppose to be joking but...that's not a bad idea..

How about star and direct? :woot:

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTGrRTxyMdhSvQQOrXCWchWLTDtiPNjd wdZihrZX4wN2ztEAZg&t=1&usg=__WYqoGxyappCWYRKCDCBEQQQNpzQ=

[Young Superman]

I know I am gonna get flamed for this, but I think Ben Affleck could make a good older Superman.

[raybia]

I know I am gonna get flamed for this, but I think Ben Affleck could make a good older Superman.

Aw hell, why not!


By the way, I'm beginning to think this new Supeman movie thingy is just a myth.

[GreenKToo]

Hmmm. I wonder if my fears are coming to pass, which is that it's on hold. I hope not.
WB sure don't help things by being so tight lipped either.

[Showtime]

I think some sort of info will come out out in October.

Singer was announced in October '04 for the release in June '06.

Just pure random guessing on my part though.

Different schedule because it is a winter release at this point.

My theory is that maybe the Superman news is holding back the Batman 3 news.

This is pure speculation, but I think the Batman 3 stuff is a done deal, but Nolan is just waiting on Superman (working out the contracts, director etc) so they can announce them both at the same time.

I think the problem is some people are still waiting for this big announcement at a podium, which isn't going to happen.

We got the release date of Batman. Even though it wasn't made official... we know that Chris Nolan is coming back to direct. We know Bale, Freeman, Oldman, and Caine will be back. There isn't much to announce with Batman, the villian or villians being the major tidbits of news.

With Superman, as I mentioned previously...we can pretty much come to the conclusion the film will come out in December, I would say December 19th or the 21st. As for a title, I might bet it is "Man of Steel" or "Superman: Man of Steel". Some variation of that.

e playlist's track record is questionable, despite being a pretty good site. So is the last sentence an assumption due to the lack of news, or based on something they heard?

I don't trust that site as far as I can throw them, they play it so vague so they can't be right or wrong, and when they are wrong...find a way to make it right.


By the way, I'm beginning to think this new Supeman movie thingy is just a myth.

It's not.

Hmmm. I wonder if my fears are coming to pass, which is that it's on hold. I hope not.
WB sure don't help things by being so tight lipped either.

I don't think it can be on hold. They have to make it.

[romeogbs19]

Thanks, Showtime!

Yeah, the WB HAS to make this movie, especially given it will effectively lose the Superman copyright in 2013. No movie means it loses an opportunity to make money and move to strike a deal to branch off the first film.

[Excel]

The standard "announcement to screen" for these origin films is 2 years-ish.

Worry if its spring 2011 and we still havent heard anything.

[Octoberist]

The more I think about it, the more I am liken to the idea of Ben Affleck doing Superman..hmmm. It's a risk but I think he has that 'it' factor.

[I SEE SPIDEY]

He showed potential with Gone Baby Gone but I never understood the love for that flick as I didn't think that he blew it out of the water directing wise and I absolutely loathed the Ludicrous screenplay. I say "no" to him eventhough I want to see The Town. As for Affleck the actor, he is a side actor if I've ever seen one. He's not strong or interesting enough to lead a movie IMHO.

[daywalker2007]

He showed potential with Gone Baby Gone but I never understood the love for that flick as I didn't think that he blew it out of the water directing wise and I absolutely loathed the Ludicrous screenplay. I say "no" to him eventhough I want to see The Town. As for Affleck the actor, he is a side actor if I've ever seen one. He's not strong or interesting enough to lead a movie IMHO.

I remember when Affleck was in his prime during the late 90s, but in the mid 2000's he became a real fat ass and something about him just irritated me,
but in recent years he has shown he is an accomplished actor and director and now looks back to his best.

Good to see affleck back in shape after almost a decade as a lard ass.

[Showtime]

Thanks, Showtime!

Yeah, the WB HAS to make this movie, especially given it will effectively lose the Superman copyright in 2013. No movie means it loses an opportunity to make money and move to strike a deal to branch off the first film.

Once they dipped into the Nolan, Nolan, and Goyer Offices, it should have told anybody they were serious about getting it made.

The standard "announcement to screen" for these origin films is 2 years-ish.

Worry if its spring 2011 and we still havent heard anything.

For a very rough timeline, you can go by what happened with Superman Returns and just apply it to a December 2012 release. Again, rough.

[solidsnake86]

I think some sort of info will come out out in October.

Singer was announced in October '04 for the release in June '06.

Just pure random guessing on my part though.

Was Singer announced in October '04, for some reason I remember us finding out he was directing in June of '04 and Routh was found out to be cast by august (I think Latino Review may have scooped that). IMO I think they're further along then we actually think they are. They've probably been working on this script for a year now, if it is Jonah as director we would have already known that for a while now, even if it isn't him I wouldnt be surprised if a lot of prep work has already been completed, i.e. artwork and story boards, so that whatever director is chosen, they can jump right in seeing as how he probably wont have much say in terms of story. As for casting, the biggest part is superman and I'm really interested to see how it goes down this time if there looking for more of a tv actor or someone with a bit more experience.

[GreenKToo]

Once they dipped into the Nolan, Nolan, and Goyer Offices, it should have told anybody they were serious about getting it made.



For a very rough timeline, you can go by what happened with Superman Returns and just apply it to a December 2012 release. Again, rough.
If thats the case, then two years should be it. If I remember correctly, june of 04 was when we found out SINGER was the director and it was released two years later. We should be hearing something within a couple of months then going by the two year time frame.
That said, all kinds of rumors were out regarding SR even BEFORE we knew who directed and was cast. That's what worries me, other than the Hamm rumors a couple of months ago, we're hearing no rumors, no nothing.

[Superman2007]

Was Singer announced in October '04, for some reason I remember us finding out he was directing in June of '04 and Routh was found out to be cast by august (I think Latino Review may have scooped that). IMO I think they're further along then we actually think they are. They've probably been working on this script for a year now, if it is Jonah as director we would have already known that for a while now, even if it isn't him I wouldnt be surprised if a lot of prep work has already been completed, i.e. artwork and story boards, so that whatever director is chosen, they can jump right in seeing as how he probably wont have much say in terms of story. As for casting, the biggest part is superman and I'm really interested to see how it goes down this time if there looking for more of a tv actor or someone with a bit more experience.
You're right, my mistake. Variety announced him to direct in July '04.

[Superman2007]

I know people have been saying that they're looking at TV actors.

I just think they need someone on the calibre of Bale and Reynolds. Someone who is known, and reliable but hasn't had their monster blockbuster hit yet.

[solidsnake86]

If thats the case, then two years should be it. If I remember correctly, june of 04 was when we found out SINGER was the director and it was released two years later. We should be hearing something within a couple of months then going by the two year time frame.
That said, all kinds of rumors were out regarding SR even BEFORE we knew who directed and was cast. That's what worries me, other than the Hamm rumors a couple of months ago, we're hearing no rumors, no nothing.

The thing with singer and SR is that in that case it all happend really fast, when he was announced as director did they even have a full script, I know they had the story outline. This time around, we know there is already a script, and lets face it, the director (especially if it isn't Jonah), probably wont be making large changes to it. So I would say there is still plenty of time left, sure if Christmas comes and goes and we still haven't heard anything then it would seem troubling. I do agree with you that its odd we haven't heard any rumours whatsoever. Has WB really stopped all of these movie websites (and by that I mean the more reliable ones) from running with any rumours.

Its still over two years away and I think we have to realize that WB doesn't have to start filming in April because fans think its a good time to start filming or else its doomed. Like I've said before, late summer or fall would be a great guess if you take SR's timeline and shift it 6 months.

[GreenKToo]

Two years until its released is coming up in a couple of months. I'm just gonna be patient till then. Lots and lots of things have to be lined up, ie, director, composer, cast, FX studio etc etc.
We should be hearing something soon. It's hard to keep things like that a secret. no matter how hard they try to keep a lid on things, stuff leaks.

[Anita18]

I remember when Affleck was in his prime during the late 90s, but in the mid 2000's he became a real fat ass and something about him just irritated me,
but in recent years he has shown he is an accomplished actor and director and now looks back to his best.

Good to see affleck back in shape after almost a decade as a lard ass.
When was Ben Affleck EVER a lard ass? :huh: Jeebus he isn't Val Kilmer, fer cryin' out loud. :whatever:

[BenReilly]

According to Deadline Hollywood, Guillermo Del Toro was supposedly offered the director's gig, but turned it down in favor of doing At The Mountains of Madness instead:

And watch how deft del Toro is when I ask him to confirm what my sources tell me, that he could have resurrected Superman but instead chose HP Lovecraft's South Pole terror tale he'll make with James Cameron.

http://www.deadline.com/2010/09/toronto-qa-julias-eyes-and-biutiful-producer-guillermo-del-toro/

[Dark Knight]

According to Deadline Hollywood, Guillermo Del Toro was supposedly offered the director's gig, but turned it down in favor of doing At The Mountains of Madness instead:






Wow!

IF true, Del Toro would have been a great choice to work with the Nolans' on Superman.

I recommended him right after he dropped out of The Hobbit!

Too bad he declined to make a film that could very well wind up being irrelevant!

He would have made Braniac a very creepy otherwordly character IMO!

Oh well....

[batman44]

According to Deadline Hollywood, Guillermo Del Toro was supposedly offered the director's gig, but turned it down in favor of doing At The Mountains of Madness instead:

Good to know that they were/ are(?) aiming at quality directors.

[Changeling]

Thats too bad about Del Toro. Maybe that means the studio isnt looking at Goyer and Jonah for the directing gig and theyre looking really experienced and great director

[Changeling]

Do you think there's any way that he was offered the gig a long time ago, and it was before Nolan was involved with Supes?

[Octoberist]

I have a feeling that IF the Nolans/WB are looking for a director for Superman, keep an eye out of any films coming out of the Toronto Film Festival. I have a feeling WB is keeping a close eye on any director that have movies with good hype. Including their in-studio The Town.

[Changeling]

Yeah that seems realistic.

I'm really warming up to the idea of Affleck directing.

[Dark Knight]

Thats too bad about Del Toro. Maybe that means the studio isnt looking at Goyer and Jonah for the directing gig and theyre looking really experienced and great director





Yep! It sure is!

WB's and Nolan should look at Edward Zwick, Sam Mendes, Alfonso Cuaron, or Zack Snyder!

[Changeling]

Nice list man I'd be happy with any of them

[Changeling]

Maybe not Snyder..

[Octoberist]

I think Alfonso Cuaron would be cool but he has Gravity to film next year, and I doubt he would want to film two movies in one year (one in Janurary, then Superman in Fall/Winter).

Mark Romanek mentioned recently that he wouldn't mind doing a big movie, despite his falling out on Wolf Man..

[solidsnake86]

Like one of you said I wonder how long ago this was, even though its probably right around the time he announced his departure from the hobbit. One thing is for sure with del toro is that his movies are visually stunning, and I love the practical costumes he works with. Too bad it didn't work out, hopefully some websites pick up on this and comment. I still wouldn't be surprised if we end up with one of the Harry Potter directors.

[GinsterHead]

A pity about Del Toro, if true. :csad:

Still, solidsnake86 has the right idea.
I wouldn't mind if any of the HP directors got the gig...well, maybe I'd mind if Chris Columbus gets it, but you get my drift. :cwink:

[Donut]

I have a feeling WB is keeping a close eye on any director that have movies with good hype. Including their in-studio The Town.

So you want Ben Affleck to direct Superman ?

[batman44]

I would love Alfonso Cuaron as director, but how about Matt Reeves?

[flickchick85]

Once they dipped into the Nolan, Nolan, and Goyer Offices, it should have told anybody they were serious about getting it made.
It should have also told them that from that point on, things were gonna be kept quiet. Super quiet. :cwink:

The only HP directors I would approve of are Cuaron and Yates. I would've said no to Reeves in the past, but Let Me In has been getting pretty good reviews, so now I think I'd be willing to give him a shot.

And regarding that recent report if true, to be honest, while I'm glad they're going for quality directors, I'm not sure I would have liked Del Toro's style meshing with Superman. He reminds me of a less monotonous Tim Burton in some ways, and that atmosphere he brings, while great for something like The Hobbit, would just seem all wrong for Supes, imo (and yes, I realize Burton was once attached to Superman, and I wouldn't have liked that, either).

This is gonna sound kinda weird and anti-auteur (believe me, I don't mean it that way), but I feel like we need someone without such a distinctive look/tone that carries over from movie-to-movie. I feel that was one of the problems with Singer's take in SR (like Roger Ebert said, it was a Superman movie that looked more like a Batman movie, due to Singer's grey aesthetic). I'd rather see someone who has a very diverse and eclectic resume when it comes to aesthetics. Unless those aesthetics they are known for just scream "Superman."

[FilmNerdJamie]

I think Alfonso Cuaron would be cool but he has Gravity to film next year, and I doubt he would want to film two movies in one year (one in Janurary, then Superman in Fall/Winter).

Assuming Gravity happens (which is looking more and more doubtful judging by the clash over securing a lead), that will eat all of 2011 and most of 2012 for Cuaron. Very heavy-effects production.

Mark Romanek mentioned recently that he wouldn't mind doing a big movie, despite his falling out on Wolf Man..

Let me put it this way, bud. Romanek might be game. But him walking from Wolf Man like he did did him zero favors in the eyes of studios.

The reason Joe Johnston walked away unmarked from its failure was because he was brought just before cameras rolled with a cast, script, designs, sets, etc. locked in that was picked by Romanek. The fact the finished result wasn't an outright disaster (although the movie still sucked) was a miracle. Everyone knows Johnston did the best he could under those circumstances. Hence he received none of the blame.

After he pulled that crap, I'd be shocked if any studio handed him an uber-pricey tentpole. He had his chance and he **** his bed. On purpose.

I would love Alfonso Cuaron as director, but how about Matt Reeves?

Reeves certainly has skill but doesn't have clout. He'd take the orders from the studio on something big like Superman or Star Trek 2 - the latter of which I wouldn't be surprised to see him direct. I'd prefer Abrams return, but just getting the hunch (which I hope I'm wrong) he'll pass the torch to someone else.

[bunk]

Reeves certainly has skill but doesn't have clout. He'd take the orders from the studio on something big like Superman or Star Trek 2 - the latter of which I wouldn't be surprised to see him direct. I'd prefer Abrams return, but just getting the hunch (which I hope I'm wrong) he'll pass the torch to someone else.

You better knock on some wood! I need Abrams directing ST2.

[hobo123]

anybody support Danny Boyle?

[maenalus]

I'm not against Boyle. Though, nothing particularly suggests him.

[Superman2007]

anybody support Danny Boyle?
Sunshine convinced me that Boyle would be amazing for a Superman film. Especially if they emphasize more outer-space elements, and the Brainiac villain rumors have any merit...

Besides The Beach he has a pretty solid track record for creating quality flicks. He's explored quite a few different genres and I think he'd make quite the the dent in the superhero genre with Man of Steel.

[Bruce_Begins]

Since Nolan knows Sam Raimi well, I wouldn't be Surprised if Raimi's name suddenly comes up for consideration.

[hobo123]

Sunshine convinced me that Boyle would be amazing for a Superman film. Especially if they emphasize more outer-space elements, and the Brainiac villain rumors have any merit...

Besides The Beach he has a pretty solid track record for creating quality flicks. He's explored quite a few different genres and I think he'd make quite the the dent in the superhero genre with Man of Steel.

i think Danny Boyle would be prefect for this film. he's an oscar winner, his past movies have been pretty successful and most importantly he's free.

i honestly wouldnt be surprised if he actually gets the job

[dark_b]

Boyle perfect for a 200 millions heavy effects movie about a guy with a red cape? ;)

[treeringralph]

A Late '10 or Early '11 Announcement for BATMAN 3?
Posted by Jett @ 8:18 AM on Tuesday, September 14, 2010


"When is there going to be an official BATMAN 3 announcement?"
Well, according to a longtime industry insider FOBOF (“Friend of Batman On Film”), not anytime soon -- with “soon” being a relative term.

Our FOBOF says that an official announcement will most likely come via the trades either right before the end of 2010 and the holiday break, or early in 2011. That’s soon, but probably not soon enough for some impatient folks.

Really, what’s the point of an official announcement right now other than to appease a particular subgroup of fandom? The mainstream -- who makes up the majority of the movie-going audience -- couldn’t care less.

The bottom line here that BATMAN 3 could probably be announced a few weeks prior to its July 20th, 2012 release and STILL own the Summer 2012 box office. Regardless, there WILL be an announcement once Chris Nolan’s ready. We know the release date and we know that Nolan’s returning, so relax and enjoy the run up to BATMAN 3!

(With all that said, just watch ‘em issue a B3 press release tomorrow!)

If the rumor that WB wants to piggyback Supes news with B3 news it true, than this might be something for us to consider.

...even though, it IS basically what we're talking about.

[Dark Knight]

They should also look at Gore Verbinski as director.

BioShock is dead isn't it?

[Dark_Lord]

A Late '10 or Early '11 Announcement for BATMAN 3?
Posted by Jett @ 8:18 AM on Tuesday, September 14, 2010


"When is there going to be an official BATMAN 3 announcement?"
Well, according to a longtime industry insider FOBOF (“Friend of Batman On Film”), not anytime soon -- with “soon” being a relative term.

Our FOBOF says that an official announcement will most likely come via the trades either right before the end of 2010 and the holiday break, or early in 2011. That’s soon, but probably not soon enough for some impatient folks.

Really, what’s the point of an official announcement right now other than to appease a particular subgroup of fandom? The mainstream -- who makes up the majority of the movie-going audience -- couldn’t care less.

The bottom line here that BATMAN 3 could probably be announced a few weeks prior to its July 20th, 2012 release and STILL own the Summer 2012 box office. Regardless, there WILL be an announcement once Chris Nolan’s ready. We know the release date and we know that Nolan’s returning, so relax and enjoy the run up to BATMAN 3!

(With all that said, just watch ‘em issue a B3 press release tomorrow!)

If the rumor that WB wants to piggyback Supes news with B3 news it true, than this might be something for us to consider.

...even though, it IS basically what we're talking about.

Aren't they going to start fliming Batman 3 around March/April? You can replace the article with a "DUH!". :oldrazz:

I'm really interested to find out the villain(s), new cast members and title for Batman 3, but I'm more interested in Superman. A director and title announcement by the end of the year would be great. After that, maybe a cast announcement by Summer 2011.

[Gamma Goliath]

Nevermind

[Octoberist]

I just don't Jett's claims because they're (again) too vague and too obvious. Nothing insightful or new to report. It's to the point where he shouldn't have posted anything b/c it just leaves people more..frustrated.

[Bad Superman]

I'm starting to believe it ain't happening. Things have been way too quiet and time is short if the 2012 due date is accurate. I hope I'm wrong.

[batman44]

Patience my pretties. Don't be surprised if the movie is further along then we think.

[Mr. Earle]

Hey guys, i was just on the phone with Chris Nolan himself and he told me that he'll announce Batman 3 either in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2016.

Dont say i didnt tell you so.

[Showtime]

I just don't Jett's claims because they're (again) too vague and too obvious. Nothing insightful or new to report. It's to the point where he shouldn't have posted anything b/c it just leaves people more..frustrated.

I love what is categorized as news by some.

Our FOBOF says that an official announcement will most likely come via the trades either right before the end of 2010 and the holiday break, or early in 2011.

Breaking news story right there. :dry:

[GreenKToo]

Yup, we pretty know the when. What we wanna know is the who and what.

[General Vulcun]

I'm calling dibs on Inception dvd release. It seems...neater.

[batman44]

http://heatvision.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/09/dc-warner-bros.html

[batman44]

Edit: double.

[GreenKToo]

WB has did this before. They get you all excited with a tease about a big announcement that never comes. I'm not buying it until I see it.

[SuperDaniel]

Its on the hype main page. Its real.

[gillberg2k1]

Interesting... :)

[GreenKToo]

Hmmm. so it seems.

[solidsnake86]

I guess BOF's all encompassing guess was right, he must have some great insider sources, lol. Hopefully now they have things in order and if they are planning something in a months time hopefully stuff will leak before that.

[Showtime]

I guess BOF's all encompassing guess was right, he must have some great insider sources, lol. Hopefully now they have things in order and if they are planning something in a months time hopefully stuff will leak before that.

Sources as far as the eye can see. :dry:

I'd love to jump and cheer, but we've been hearing this for years and years.
It's nice that it is from an individual right in the thick of things, but still hard to get even a bit excited right now. Although, we know Batman 3 is coming and when and we know they have to get going on Superman the last we heard. I would say Flash is going to be discussed and a very slim chance that Wonder Woman and/or Justice League will be as well.

[GreenKToo]

Sources as far as the eye can see. :dry:

I'd love to jump and cheer, but we've been hearing this for years and years.
It's nice that it is from an individual right in the thick of things, but still hard to get even a bit excited right now. Although, we know Batman 3 is coming and when and we know they have to get going on Superman the last we heard. I would say Flash is going to be discussed and a very slim chance that Wonder Woman and/or Justice League will be as well.
So true. I've danced this dance before.

[FlawlessVictory]

ntwdH3Q54ZY

[BH/HHH]

Well lets just wait and see shall we. Hopefully its exactly what we've been waiting for.

[solidsnake86]

What exactly could they be announcing that we don't already know though besides maybe offical release dates and estimated years. Batman and superman aside, you would think that the flash will be released in 2013, wonder woman they still don't know what to do and Justice League would be dependent on the rest. At some point they are going to have to lock in a director for superman, but if they are still searching or they are close to locking someone in then we should be hearing rumours. Like a lot of you have said, we hear this before, in 2008, then again in 2009 which is there is anything to learn, I don't expect some official announcement.

[FaT_tONle]

I think more of you need to come around like Flawless has... this is basically setting the stage for the BB3 announcement and everything else will be "in development". I am not saying the Supes reboot won't eventually happen by 2013, but that's all anyone should expect.

[bgshw44]

anyone else find it curious that sites like latino review ran with show and jamies hamm piece this week, over a month after posting, and now the news that dc will announce their plans next week.

could we be looking at a date, a director, and a superman?

[Superman2007]

I'd say if they were testing or offering the role to a bunch of actors more tidbits of information would be coming through from TMT or Latino Review. I think the first announcement will be the director and maybe a lead a month or two later.

[Octoberist]

No, I believe that Superman will get a title and a director, while Batman 3 will get the most info. Wouldn't it be cool if it was like someone out of nowhere like....Edgar Wright?

I think The Flash will finally get a release date, but I don't know if it'll go any further than that IF they went ahead with a 2013 date. Who knows. I think they'll release the 'real' writers IF Greg Berlanti and his team aren't doing the screenplay, and just wanted to do the treatment.

[Sawyer]

No, I believe that Superman will get a title and a director, while Batman 3 will get the most info. Wouldn't it be cool if it was like someone out of nowhere like....Edgar Wright?

I think The Flash will finally get a release date, but I don't know if it'll go any further than that IF they went ahead with a 2013 date. Who knows.

I wouldn't mind him, but given the massacre of Scott Pilgrim, I dont think Warner Bros. would go for that at all.

[Octoberist]

In most cases I would agree with you but in this I'm not because of the material (Scott Pilgrim) and its appeal didn't capture the public. Doesn't mean he can't handle something like Superman. I think he can, though he's more suited maybe for The Flash but he would be an interesting pick.

At this point, I can't see Antman moving forward. I think the main reason is that he's a character that won't tie into the Avengers WHEN his character SHOULD be tied in somehow since he is/was a member in the comics. Since it's also a Marvel Studio film, I think it's just stuck.

[GreenKToo]

I'm not expecting much. Just some Batman news and ''We're working on bringing your fav DC characters to the big screen, so stay tuned'' kinda talk.

[treeringralph]

Sam Raimi...

...?

[El Payaso]

Sam raimi what?

[ChickenScratch]

Sam Raimi...

...?

I want that guy nowhere near Superman. I saw what he did with a hero I didn't even like, Superman I love.

[DCUmoviepage]

For the ones what dont have seen yet

http://video.aol.com/aolvideo/aol-television/jon-hamm-talks-superman-rumors-091610-tv-replay/610187209001

[sf2]

ghostrider sequal got a confirmed release date. WB r u still sleeping?

[Octoberist]

ghostrider sequal got a confirmed release date. WB r u still sleeping?

Did you totally missed out on the news (which is on the main page) about WB and DC having an announcement next week & a timeline next month?

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/107328-dc-entertainment-to-announce-its-superhero-line-up

[MAN O STEEL]

Did you totally missed out on the news (which is on the main page) about WB and DC having an announcement next week & a timeline next month?

http://www.superherohype.com/news/ar...erhero-line-up (http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/107328-dc-entertainment-to-announce-its-superhero-line-up)



Did you totally miss the fact that we've been promised this about 6 times before since 2006 & been let down every time?. Just sayin man.




Steve

[Octoberist]

Did you totally miss the fact that we've been promised this about 6 times before since 2006 & been let down every time?. Just sayin man.




Steve

Nice try, but it still made my point with the other poster.

[dark_b]

For the ones what dont have seen yet

http://video.aol.com/aolvideo/aol-television/jon-hamm-talks-superman-rumors-091610-tv-replay/610187209001smart move Hamm. smart move.

[Mr. Earle]

God i hope they dont cast Hamm as Superman. He'll be 41 by the time they start shooting. They need a guy in his early thirties.

[GreenKToo]

ghostrider sequal got a confirmed release date. WB r u still sleeping?
Sad ain't it. I dont care if marvel does rush their films, at least they do get them out there and keep their fans in the know about things.
Waiting on WB to do anything is like a 5 year old anxiously awaiting Christmas morning, it takes FOREVER for it to arrive. Hopefully our wait will be just as fulfilling in the end.

[Rust]

Right. It's bad business. Or we're way too impatient. Most likely both.

[GreenKToo]

If WB hadn't already promised (several) annoucements in the past that never materialized I wouldnt say a thing, but we've been down this road before.
Maybe this time they mean it, we'll see.

[echostation]

so any news as to when these so called soon announcements will come?

[Paul-el]

For the ones what dont have seen yet

http://video.aol.com/aolvideo/aol-television/jon-hamm-talks-superman-rumors-091610-tv-replay/610187209001



Honestly, I can see him as Supes or Lex -- I'd really like to see him fill one of those roles.

[Figs]

so any news as to when these so called soon announcements will come?

According to the announcement it should be this coming week.

[echostation]

I really don't see that happening, I believe like this week will pass like any other, It would be FANTASTIC if we got a name for the film, director, actual officially credited writers and stage at which the movie is at... I mean SOME bloody update

Man it's like WB's been scared as **** to do something since 2006, while Marvel just ballsed it out and after few years just went for it with a redo. It wasn't the best but much better I feel than the earlier attempt. The least WB could do is have some strategy then always engage in hot air.

[Gabe99]

From Bleeding Cool:
Guillermo Del Toro Has Turned Down The New Superman Film (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/09/17/guillermo-del-toro-turned-down-superman/)

[BH/HHH]

From Bleeding Cool:
Guillermo Del Toro Has Turned Down The New Superman Film (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/09/17/guillermo-del-toro-turned-down-superman/)

If thats true weird choice in my opinion his movies tend to be very dark and weird. But it does show what caliber of director they are aiming for.

[Paul-el]

I have a question for everyone since I'm not too familiar with the comics. If you were in charge of the movie, which comics/graphic novels would you base the story on and why? I want to read which ones would translate best to film.

Which stories really define him in a contemporary way and also develop the character of Clark Kent?

[I SEE SPIDEY]

WTF is Bleeding Cool?

[El Payaso]

From Bleeding Cool:
Guillermo Del Toro Has Turned Down The New Superman Film (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/09/17/guillermo-del-toro-turned-down-superman/)

Thank GOD! :up:

[byte19]

i've one question guys all this talk a reboot for Superman & Superman Returns, etc.
in the case of Supes Returns; how do you reboot a reboot because if you think about it; SR was remake/sequel (aka the reboot). you have new cast, new story based partially on another story or a series of events for miner continuity. don't get me wrong; me and my girl still love SR. if wb is going to do this they don't need to completely start over with the a new origin. it has already been done with SR just take it to the next level and just maintain some miner contiunity for a solid plot.

[Blackman]

SR wasnt a reboot. It was a sequel to S:TM and Superman II

[X Knight]

SR was a vague sequel type thing to the Original Donner/Reeve movies ( which one exactly, we'll never know ).

SR was also a failed attempt at restarting the Superman franchise. This has nothing to do with whether you liked or hated SR. The cold hard reality is that SR failed, for whatever reason, to generate its own new Superman franchise. Otherwise, we would have already had a sequel by now ( or it at least would have been filming ).

Barring any last minute surprise, I think it is safe to say that SR is dead. It's time to start fresh with a new direction. And I think that's what WB is doing..........

[hopefuldreamer]

If they are going to go with the JK dying, hibernating in an ice fortress storyline, i'd rather have no mention of the origins at all.

But there are plenty of different versions of Superman's backstory. Some have the fortress. Some have JK dying. Others don't.

Let's go with them, please? Show Clark Kent travelling the world learning the good in people... like in Batman Begins with Bruce learning from the criminal life.

[HighFivingMF]

SR was a vague sequel type thing to the Original Donner/Reeve movies ( which one exactly, we'll never know ).

SR was also a failed attempt at restarting the Superman franchise. This has nothing to do with whether you liked or hated SR. The cold hard reality is that SR failed, for whatever reason, to generate its own new Superman franchise. Otherwise, we would have already had a sequel by now ( or it at least would have been filming ).

Barring any last minute surprise, I think it is safe to say that SR is dead. It's time to start fresh with a new direction. And I think that's what WB is doing..........
It's a sequel to Superman 2. Ignoring 3 and 4.

And we know.

[BH/HHH]

I have a question for everyone since I'm not too familiar with the comics. If you were in charge of the movie, which comics/graphic novels would you base the story on and why? I want to read which ones would translate best to film.

Which stories really define him in a contemporary way and also develop the character of Clark Kent?

I think if they were to totally reboot with an origin Superman Birthright would be the way to go. Its a fantastic update of the Superman mythology set in modern day.

Thank GOD! :up:

My thoughts exactly, Del Toro is a good director but his style is too dark and weird for a Superman movie.

[Rust]

I know it's IMDB, but isn't this a bit pretentious...?

The proposed plot:

"Super powered Clark Kent has travelled the world for years as a journalist trying to find his place in the world. Arriving in Metropolis, he realises his place and potential as the world's greatest hero: Superman. An immediate hero, he soon comes across the path of Lex Luthor, a business mogul who owns almost all of Metropolis through corrupt and illegal methods with the help of crime syndicate Intergang. Their battle is soon disrupted by the dramatic appearance of an alien ship and Brainiac, a rogue alien super computer who has come in search of an all powerful crystal. He recognises Superman as the owner of the crystal revealing his origin as an alien and holds the world to ransom in exchange for the crystal. Superman must find the strength to defeat Brainiac by using the full extent of his powers, will and hope for humanity and discover his true origins to become the greatest hero of them all. Written by Dave Nichols"


From where did he pull that? Crystal? I thought Brainiac stole cities.

[BH/HHH]

I know it's IMDB, but isn't this a bit pretentious...?

The proposed plot:

"Super powered Clark Kent has travelled the world for years as a journalist trying to find his place in the world. Arriving in Metropolis, he realises his place and potential as the world's greatest hero: Superman. An immediate hero, he soon comes across the path of Lex Luthor, a business mogul who owns almost all of Metropolis through corrupt and illegal methods with the help of crime syndicate Intergang. Their battle is soon disrupted by the dramatic appearance of an alien ship and Brainiac, a rogue alien super computer who has come in search of an all powerful crystal. He recognises Superman as the owner of the crystal revealing his origin as an alien and holds the world to ransom in exchange for the crystal. Superman must find the strength to defeat Brainiac by using the full extent of his powers, will and hope for humanity and discover his true origins to become the greatest hero of them all. Written by Dave Nichols"


From where did he pull that? Crystal? I thought Brainiac stole cities.

Sounds like wishful thinking from a fan :D

[sf2]

...

Barring any last minute surprise, I think it is safe to say that SR is dead. It's time to start fresh with a new direction. And I think that's what WB is doing..........

i scare very much about the 'fresh and new' stuffs.
there are normally where the troubles come from.

i think for superman movie, every ingredients are 'there'; the stories, the relationships, the scenes, the plots. we just wanna see them happen before our eyes. unfortunately they just refused to do that. they wanna introduce new stuffs. and it takes them forever to find the right kinda new stuffs. and they failed as usual in the end.

why can't they just make a simple superhero - superman movie??? why it must have new stuffs???!!!

[BH/HHH]

i scare very much about the 'fresh and new' stuffs.
there are normally where the troubles come from.

i think for superman movie, every ingredients are 'there'; the stories, the relationships, the scenes, the plots. we just wanna see them happen before our eyes. unfortunately they just refused to do that. they wanna introduce new stuffs. and it takes them forever to find the right kinda new stuffs. and they failed as usual in the end.

why can't they just make a simple superhero - superman movie??? why it must have new stuffs???!!!

The most annoying thing is Superman is not hard to do and do right. There are so many comic stories that they could adapt into brilliant movies aswell but they just don't seem to have a clue.

[Rust]

Exactly. You would think that by now they would have learned that sticking to the source material makes the better film. But of course, not necessarily the most profitable.

[Bruce_Begins]

i scare very much about the 'fresh and new' stuffs.
there are normally where the troubles come from.

i think for superman movie, every ingredients are 'there'; the stories, the relationships, the scenes, the plots. we just wanna see them happen before our eyes. unfortunately they just refused to do that. they wanna introduce new stuffs. and it takes them forever to find the right kinda new stuffs. and they failed as usual in the end.

why can't they just make a simple superhero - superman movie??? why it must have new stuffs???!!!

"The New Stuff" thing got us into a developmental hell, otherwise we could have got at least four Superman movies by now, wierd concept ideas for a story given by -Burton, JJ Abrams, and McG.

They can just take STAS and makes a good Superman movie.

[BH/HHH]

"The New Stuff" thing got us into a developmental hell, otherwise we could have got at least four Superman movies by now, wierd concept ideas for a story given by -Burton, JJ Abrams, and McG.

They can just take STAS and makes a good Superman movie.

:up:

[DCUmoviepage]

Tom Welling talks about Superman On Film here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_WA1Un1vEw&feature=player_embedded). Personally, i don wanna see him as supes in big screen...

[Sub-Zero]

"The New Stuff" thing got us into a developmental hell, otherwise we could have got at least four Superman movies by now, wierd concept ideas for a story given by -Burton, JJ Abrams, and McG.

They can just take STAS and makes a good Superman movie.


stas was new stuff too, but it worked b/c the creators didn't take HUGE liberties with the source material. the problem with the studio is that they keep thinking they need to reinvent the character to make him relevant today, and that's ok, but they are still looking at the christopher reeve movies as inspiration. what they don't realize is that the characters have all evolved from the 70s-80s. clark isn't a bumbling oaf any more, and superman isn't jesus, or an emo stalker.

i'm glad that nolan and goyer are working on this. they knew what to do with batman. they took him from a rubber nippled joke to one of the darkest, grittiest movie superheroes to date.
they kept calling harvey dent the "white knight", a hero they need but not one they deserve. someone so inherently good that he can clean up the city forever. that description fits superman to a tee. i really hope they bring that to their interpretation of superman.

[BH/HHH]

Tom Welling talks about Superman On Film here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_WA1Un1vEw&feature=player_embedded). Personally, i don wanna see him as supes in big screen...

If they had the intention of continuing Smallville in the movie world I'd have been very happy with this but with it been a reboot it won't ever happen.

[smooth3006]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qK9leZLItek

they MUST use this score even in a reboot. :super:

[dark_b]

Exactly. You would think that by now they would have learned that sticking to the source material makes the better film. But of course, not necessarily the most profitable.hahahahhaha:lmao:
says who?

TDK and BB made changes and it worked since it was a live action.

Spiderman and organic web?

:cwink:

[The Sage]

"The New Stuff" thing got us into a developmental hell, otherwise we could have got at least four Superman movies by now, wierd concept ideas for a story given by -Burton, JJ Abrams, and McG.

They can just take STAS and makes a good Superman movie.

I like STAS, but I'd rather the writers go straight to the comics and come up with their own interpretation than base it off of a secondary source/adaptation. The latter is pretty much what Singer did with Superman Returns.

Besides, a Superman movie could and should be better than STAS.

[Paul-el]

I think Nolan is a smart enough filmmaker to realize you can't change the mythology of the character -- I think what is meant here is, like others have suggested, he is updating the character. Do you really think Nolan would've signed on if the story wasn't really well thought out? He's a screenplay first kind of guy -- get the story in place, then worry about everything else.

[Naite22]

I think Nolan is a smart enough filmmaker to realize you can't change the mythology of the character -- I think what is meant here is, like others have suggested, he is updating the character. Do you really think Nolan would've signed on if the story wasn't really well thought out? He's a screenplay first kind of guy -- get the story in place, then worry about everything else.

Well said, and definitely true.

[FilmNerdJamie]

http://heatvision.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/09/dc-warner-bros.html

There will be an organizational announcement next week, then in about a month Warner Bros. will unveil a spread sheet detailing how the various superheroes will be reintroduced to consumers, and on more than just feature film platforms.DC Entertainment headed to Burbank (http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=28438).

I figured it'd be nothing major in regards to Batman 3, Superman: The Man of Steel, etc. based on that "organizational announcement" remark.

[batman44]

I figured as much as well.

[BH/HHH]

DC Entertainment headed to Burbank (http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=28438).

I figured it'd be nothing major in regards to Batman 3, Superman: The Man of Steel, etc. based on that "organizational announcement" remark.

Wow major announcement well lets wait a month for the next one :D

[Lighthouse]

I'm feeling really stupid, because I read the article and still have no idea what it means.

[BH/HHH]

I'm feeling really stupid, because I read the article and still have no idea what it means.

Neither do I mate ha ha

[gillberg2k1]

The "real" announcement is coming next month, as reported here and elsewhere.

[General Vulcun]

The "real" announcement is coming next month, as reported here and elsewhere.

Neat. :up:

[Orin]

No, it isn't...

One more question on a related topic. Last week Warner Bros. CEO Barry Meyer was quoted as saying a spread sheet detailing Warner's plans for the DC superheroes relating to how they're marketed, represented and sold to the public will be made public later in the month. While the specifics we’ll probably have to wait on, can you tell us when to expect that? Has this been one of the primary focuses of your team over the last year?

First, Mr Meyer, by his own admission, was misquoted, so we’re not going to be making that announcement in the next month, but we will be discussing a lot of our content plans before the end of the year. It won’t necessarily be exhaustive, and it will not be limited to a theatrical slate, but at the same time that we’ve been looking carefully at the organization, everyone’s been working very hard to keep the business moving in the direction we want – everyone in particular being Geoff Johns who has a lot of great stuff with our divisions. So, you will hear more about that before the end of the year.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=28456

[Octoberist]

I'm kinda getting tired of defending thme on their progress. :p

[FilmNerdJamie]

No, it isn't...

Says Nelson who originally denied Nolan was producing Superman when it was legit to MTV (http://splashpage.mtv.com/2010/02/18/watchmen-sequels-and-christopher-nolans-superman-are-just-rumors-says-dc-president/). Not saying she's BSing again. But just because she says something doesn't make it Gospel.

Shouldn't people have learned this by now? :huh:

[Orin]

Well, after the like 50.000 announced announcements that didn't ever happen maybe it isn't all that stupit to assume they will acctually make an announcement when they say there won't be one. :cwink:

[Octoberist]

She's a trickster, isn't she?

Honestly, it would be great if they just gave us a date of some sort. It could be December, but give us a date.

[Blackman]

Apparently Zack Snyder was offered Superman and he passed on it
http://www.latinoreview.com/news/exclusive-1-1-with-zack-snyder-guardians-xerxes-heavy-metal-and-more-11166

Both him and Del Toro seem better for other comic book/superhero films like Blade, Ghost Rider, or things along that line. However they are an upgrade from Goyer and Nolan and I wouldve loved to see Del Toro's take on it, not Snyder's though.

Its funny because when Goyer and Nolan were rumored as the frontrunner I kept b****ing: "Can't they get anyone better?" Well it sounds like theve been trying and failing

[Sawyer]

Snyder would be awful for Superman.

[GreenKToo]

Pretty big names, just the wrong big names imo.

[hippie_hunter]

Snyder would be awful for Superman.

Yeah, Snyder is best when developing material that already has a complete story like 300 and Watchmen. He also prefers darker material to work with as well.

A Superman movie on the other hand is not an adaptation. It's going to be an interpretation with an original story, fresh takes on the characters, etc. Something that isn't suited for Snyder.

[Karelia]

At least he knows he wouldn't be able to make it right. I'd be curious to see how he would make a Superman film, but yeah. Slowmo fight scene with Bizarrio could be cool.

WB is going for some big names, I'm wondering who all they've asked.

[XxDelta09xX]

They should just get Nolan to direct it and Goyer to produce it.

[HighFivingMF]

How about Steven Soderbergh for director? He's not done a huge action movie, but neither did Donner, Nolan, or Favreau. He's good with big casts and has a nice sensibility for atmosphere. Plus he could probably get some bigger names attracted to play supporting roles in the project.

[MAN O STEEL]

Shouldn't people have learned this by now?


What I've learned Jamie is that DC are full of ****. I've learned that every time we hear that there will be an announcement, there is none & we wait a good 6 months before hearing the supposed "announcement" rumour again, only to once again be let down by false claims. Forgive those of us who have learned our lesson.



Steve

[HighFivingMF]

What I've learned Jamie is that DC are full of ****. I've learned that every time we hear that there will be an announcement, there is none & we wait a good 6 months before hearing the supposed "announcement" rumour again, only to once again be let down by false claims. Forgive those of us who have learned our lesson.



Steve
There was, just as announced, an organizational announcement. The guy who said we'd have news in the next month was misquoted.

It's not even their responsibility or obligation to release movies based on their properties, it could be worse, all of your favorite comic book characters could be confined to only *gasp* comic books!

[Weadazoid]

If Green Lantern Fails, then they are going to abandon ship cept for Batman.

Face it Everything hinges on smarmy Heart Throb Ryan Reynolds and that girl that is just eye candy.

THe AUdience may look at the villain and laugh...sorry but the guy with the big head...just doesn't look intimidating.


I know this is the SUperman thread not the DC thread....but when they start off by saying...

We are not considering any moves to connect things like Marvel...our stories are stand along stories.... it kind of tells you thier is lack of confidence in other properties.

[HighFivingMF]

it kind of tells you thier is lack of confidence in other properties.
It means the opposite... Not making them depend on the already popular character showing up to get people interested.

[Paul-el]

How about Frank Dourbont for director? The guy makes killer flicks (no pun intended).

[Rust]

Was Snyder asked before Nolan became involved, do you think?

Maybe they're looking at completely different "no"-names or up-and-coming names now. Gareth Edwards maybe?

[BH/HHH]

How can they say misquoted? what a load of snizz, when you read what they said originally there is no way that could have been misquoted. DC just love to f**k us over.

[GreenKToo]

I doubt seriously it was a misquote. It's prolly more like a case of cold feet by them (again).
And here I thought things would be different with her in charge of DC. It seems like the same old same old to me.

[BH/HHH]

I doubt seriously it was a misquote. It's prolly more like a case of cold feet by them (again).
And here I thought things would be different with her in charge of DC. It seems like the same ole same ole to me.

:up: yeah

I seriously wish they'd learn there lesson treating their fans this way. Its a joke.

[solidsnake86]

:up: yeah

I seriously wish they'd learn there lesson treating their fans this way. Its a joke.

Treating there fans what way exactly? When you think about it what exactly is there to announce that we don't already know besides them repeating it. We know who's writing the flash, and we know its still 3 years away, what could they possibly announce.

On the batman front, we know the release date, who cares about the title and if they film in april at some point there going to be casting actors. I would say that once Nolan is done with inception (isn't the open in Italy coming up soon and the last premiere) then we'll hear news, besides I don't think he wanted to be bombarded with more batman questions then he already gets.

As for superman, we know who's writing the script and we know that one exists, thats the biggest issue if you ask me, finding a director to shoot that script wont be a problem. As Jamie said, she denied Nolan being part of superman.

[Mostpowerful]

Haha, well, at least I will always have Superman Returns and the Reeve movies. Not so bad. :)

[RachelDawes]

They should just get Nolan to direct it and Goyer to produce it.

There won't be time for that. I think Superman will be shooting while B3's in the middle of the editing process.

[Dark Knight]

Snyder would be awful for Superman.





Not with Chris Nolan as the Producer! :whatever:

[Mr. Earle]

Not with Chris Nolan as the Producer! :whatever:
S: I say we adapt this issue as it is because i have no vision of my own.
N: No, lets do something innovative. Lets say Lex isnt permabald and Superman has a suit with pads!
S: Oh hell naw! I will agree to this if you let me add more gore and nudity.
N: NO WAY.
S: Maybe a nipple shot?
N: Ah... whatever...

:awesome:

[echostation]

I told you guys that the announcement wasn't happening at all...

[FilmNerdJamie]

Bewkes did the right thing. The movie studio once again in 2009 and now 2010 has been and is having a banner year. And, with help from New Line in the fold, it's succeeding not just with huge testosterone tentpoles but also comedies and chick flicks. And Robinov has a close relationship with Chris Nolan. As such, Robinov deserves a lot of credit. Yes, the whole relationship with DC Comics is still a mess, but Robinov appointee Diane Nelson is fixing it. And I've learned there'll be an announcement in 4 weeks about a slate of new films from there.

http://www.deadline.com/2010/09/warner-bros-shakeup-succession/

So Nelson was BSing again, eh?

[GreenKToo]

Hmmm. somebody at the top is lying their a$$ off.

[Showtime]

What I've learned Jamie is that DC are full of ****. I've learned that every time we hear that there will be an announcement, there is none & we wait a good 6 months before hearing the supposed "announcement" rumour again, only to once again be let down by false claims. Forgive those of us who have learned our lesson.


Though I despise Deadline Hollywood because they have failed to learn how to credit movie blogs and websites for news and then report it as exclusives, anything Finke and co say about WB/DC...I wouldn't mind betting on it.

Finke and crew are saying 4 weeks, then I don't have a problem getting on board with that.

To believe what Nelson is saying is hilarious. Nelson's job is to ********. WB/DC's whole operation is tongue-in-cheek.

[GreenKToo]

Nelson is a buzzkill. Just another suit that doesn know the value of positive PR, and if she does know, then that's even worse.
Folks were really excited at the thought of an upcoming announcement, then she turned around and killed it today.
Somebody at WB needs to whisper in her ear ( in a nice way ) to STFU, your killing good buzz for us.

[gillberg2k1]

Regardless, most information people are expecting will be officially announced eventually. Whether it all comes in one big announcement or several smaller ones is really irrelevant. I think everyone's getting all hung up on exact dates and timeframes. Batman is obviously happening. Superman is happening. So are other projects. This shouldn't be a big surprise for anyone. I'm sure once something does get announced, it still won't be good enough. "That's it? We wanted pre-pro art, a one sheet, and a teaser!"

The thing is, and I've noticed a few have caught on... this is Warner Bros. we're talking about here. You can't really expect anything. As I mentioned before, all I was told was what their plan was at that moment. They're notorious for putting things on hold, jumping on other things at the last second, etc. Stuff is constantly shifting around and you can never be too sure about anything. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of details are still completely up in the air. WB more than any other studio seems to really have this problem. Half the people that work there don't have a clue as to anything concrete or definite; it's all hearsay or vague details. They're trying to straighten everything out over there and get everything "synched." However, the fact that two opposing views on what's actually going on down there have been published speaks volumes about that studio. This is nothing new. It's the same as it was back in 03, 04, etc.

[Kevin Smith]

...I know I'll catch hell for it but there was some pretty cool **** in JJ Abrams script. They should take another look at that and tweak, clean it up. Just blow up krypton, keep Luthor human. An elseworlds story of that script would be kinda cool at least.

[GreenKToo]

I agree. It had alot of action in it...Just a few tweaks here and there and it would be perfect.

[Octoberist]

As successful as WB has been, the Finke article makes Horn the bad guy. I don't know if that's the case, but if you look some of the failures (the lack of DC love) I think there's some truth in there. I think Alan might be just..out of touch. If he doesn't get "Slumdog Millionaire", "The Hangover" and closed down 'Warner Independent", that might be the case.

[GreenKToo]

I loved how she said, ''we're not marvel''. Really? Thanks for sharing that. We thought you were since you guys put out sooo many superhero films and all.

[DarkKnight FTW]

I loved how she said, ''we're not marvel''. Really? Thanks for sharing that. We thought you were since you guys put out sooo many superhero films and all.

And yet, "you" expect them to be. DC is not Marvel, they don't have 5 different studios putting out various comic properties. They have 1, and WB has a lot of other movies in various genres they have to worry about. Marvel spread their properties amongst other studios (losing control of several key ones) and then sold themselves to Disney. Marvel only controls the Avengers stuff and whatever else they didn't sell to Fox, Sony, etc. DC/WB don't have to worry about that so they can take their time and work on quality, rush jobs only end up with movies like Jonah Hex.

Of course you want to hear what their plans are but I doubt any of you won't the Superman movie whenever they announce it. Its like when the revelation just came out about Batman 3 not officially being on the books at Warner's. Does anybody really doubt that they're not making it, and yet there's crying and moaning. I doubt that they went threw a whole restructuring at DC and placing Geoff Johns as lead only to renig if Green Lantern isn't successful.

[Lighthouse]

I don't know how much blame I can put at Horn's feet. Batman Begins and Superman Returns were both bold risks; giving big storytellers total control over a massive potential franchise. Now, I really didn't like Superman Returns, but I can certainly appreciate a studio that takes risks like that.

[GreenKToo]

WB being who they are makes it even worse since unlike marvel, they HAVE control of ALL their properties, and could make them easier than marvel could ever hope to.

I mean really, whats the use in having so called quality films if it takes them ten years to figure out how to get em' out there. It's not rocket science we're talking about here.
A Flash film has been rumored in one form or another for over ten years now. Your ok with that? i'm not.

[solidsnake86]

WB being who they are makes it even worse since unlike marvel, they HAVE control of ALL their properties, and could make them easier than marvel could ever hope to.

I mean really, whats the use in having so called quality films if it takes them ten years to figure out how to get em' out there. It's not rocket science we're talking about here.
A Flash film has been rumored in one form or another for over ten years now. Your ok with that? i'm not.

A flash film may have been in development but it doesnt mean it was any good. Just because comic book fans think doing that whole legacy aspect with wally west is a great idea doesnt translate into a great movie idea for a general audience and I don't blame them for not approving it. Origin movies work if they are good (see batman, iron man, spider-man), so why would they bother changing it up especially when they had the character of barry allen with arguably a better origin story to explore.

Besides, you can compare to marvel all you want but it doesnt mean marvel has had quality products, Iron man was there first independent success, and yet the sequel didnt live up to the first because there so focused on avengers that, if you ask me, they obviously have no faith in these characters as solo franchises. Its all about money and if TDK hadnt made the money it did we surely would have been seeing the JL movie and for one I'm glad we aren't.

[GreenKToo]

I'm just frustrated. Dont mean to moan and groan. Exams tonite at school aren't helping any either lol.

[Octoberist]

I e-mailed Nikki Finke about what she knows about the DC film announcements (due in 4 weeks according to her) and what Diane Nelson said, rebutting it.

Now I know that maybe Diane is spinning the story, just like what she did with Superman and Christopher Nolan's involvement, so we'll see what happens :)

I'll keep you guys posted.

[J.Howlett]

Deadline has a new story about potential directors Nolan's meeting with. The name that peeked my interest if the story is true is Matt Reeves.

[Blackman]

Matt Reeves I think is a darker kind of director

I hope Duncan Jones gets picked and I hope whichever director it is that he isnt a yes man to Nolan

[mclay18]

I e-mailed Nikki Finke about what she knows about the DC film announcements (due in 4 weeks according to her) and what Diane Nelson said, rebutting it.

Good luck trying to get a response from Ms. Finke. She's notoriously private for one. Second, she isn't going to tell what she knows about a developing story because her rivals might catch on and break the news before she does.

I tried e-mailing her for some comments about evolving media for a paper I was writing for a college paper last year. The ***** never even e-mailed me back saying no thanks or anything like that. As if I was going to twist her words around...

[Dark Knight]

IMO.

Reeves or Snyder should be the pick to direct and work with Nolan as the producer....EASILY!

Tony Scott is past his prime!

[ChickenScratch]

I'm all about Zakk if it's among those choices. One thing is for sure, it'll look spectacular.

[S.A.A.D.]

IMO.

Reeves or Snyder should be the pick to direct and work with Nolan as the producer....EASILY!

Tony Scott is past his prime!

Agreed,but I'm mainly leaning towards Snyder.

[annie.j88]

snyder is style over substance in my opinion

[Man of Tomorrow]

synder is dreadful.

[annie.j88]

:cwink:

[Dark Knight]

snyder is style over substance in my opinion






Nolan would help him in the substance department.

[Blackman]

They shouldnt rely on Nolan to fix whats wrong with a certain director

[BH/HHH]

Mmm not sure about the list tbh I'll just see how it pans out

[antsman41]

Christopher Nolan -> The Prestige -> David Bowie -> Duncan Jones -> The Man Of Steel -> Christopher Nolan

PARADOX?

[Kurosawa]

Nolan would help him in the substance department.

True, but Jones doesn't need help in that department and Reeves already has both. Either of them is better than Snider and his previous comments about Superman shows that he isn't up to the task. Superman is WAY WAY harder to do right and way EASIER to screw up than Batman. Nolan himself is the first Batman guy that I feel I can trust with Superman. He's too smart to make knee-jerk decisions like other people have.

[Dark Knight]

They shouldnt rely on Nolan to fix whats wrong with a certain director






Than what was the point of hiring Nolan as the producer??

Regardless of who is named the next director, Nolan will have a say when it comes to the tone and creative vision of the next Superman film and will be a guide to whoever winds up being the director.

[echostation]

Alfonso Cuaron would have been a terrific director. Peter WEIR would make I think perhaps the best superman director of all

What about Mike Newell? What about Shekar Kapur?

[Dark Knight]

Cuaron working with Nolan would be a great team also.

[DCUmoviepage]

Zack Snyder talks in a interview to brazilian blog SOS Hollywood about Xerxes( the 300 prequel) and briefly about Superman. I translate for your can understand

"I am not involved with anything of the DC for now. To be honest, do not talk about any partnership and my time now very scarce for it. "

Source (http://www.soshollywood.com.br/exclusivo-snyder-explica-xerxes-e-santoro-pode-retornar/)

[HighFivingMF]

Did Charlie Kelly type the interview up? :dry:

[SuperDaniel]

The guy obviously cant speak decent English:

This is what Snyder said:

"I'm not involved with anything regarding DC right now. I didn`t talk about any partnership with Nolan and I'm really busy nowadays"

[Octoberist]

the article was translated through babelfish or google translator.

[echostation]

I so wish they considered Peter Weir... I think he'd honestly make the best director for Superman easily

[matrix_ghost]

Alfonso Cuaron would have been a terrific director. Peter WEIR would make I think perhaps the best superman director of all

What about Mike Newell? What about Shekar Kapur?

I agree. And i do think that WB would love him to take on of their comic book properties after his work on Potter. But unless he delays ( or god forbid stops) production of Gravity , he won't be doing supes.

[DCUmoviepage]

After Aronofsky rumor, more one comes Is Natalie Portman Lois Lane?

http://www.whatsplaying.com.au/2010/09/film-news-is-natalie-portman-lois-lane/ (http://www.whatsplaying.com.au/2010/09/film-news-is-natalie-portman-lois-lane/)

[XxDelta09xX]

^That would be Sweet!

[Hole Shot]

I'm not opposed to the idea of Portman as Lois, but for chemistry's sake shouldn't they cast Superman before they start picking their Lois?

[Colonel Kurtz]

Deleted.

[Dark Knight]

Hard for me to see Nolan and Darren making a good team on Superman.

I would still rather see Snyder or Duncan get it....but if Darren was named the director, I would not have a problem with it that's for damn sure.

Portman as Lois Lane would be solid also!

[MAN O STEEL]

HAHAHA Portman as Lois & Christensen as Superman, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. :awesome::oldrazz:







Steve

[childeroland]

After the Ryan Reynolds mess with Deadpool and Green Lantern, would Marvel even let Portman do Superman, now that she's doing Thor and signed for sequels?

And WB wanted her for SR (according to Moviehole)? I always thought she tried out for that and got rejected.