Christopher Nolan Meeting With Directorial Candidates

[Project862006]

Nolan has a Choice to pick for director
EXCLUSIVE: Superman producers Chris Nolan and Emma Thomas are getting serious about resuscitating the Man of Steel. I'm told they have begun meeting with a short list of directors for the job of directing Superman, the picture which will be financed by Warner Bros and Legendary Pictures. On the list: Unstoppable's Tony Scott, Let Me In's Matt Reeves,Battle: Los Angeles helmer Jonathan Liebesman (who just got the Warner Bros/Legendary job of directing Clash of the Titans 2), Duncan Jones, who just directed Source Code, and Sucker Punch helmer Zack Snyder. director Matt Reeves, As Deadline first revealed, Nolan came up with an idea that put the Batman director in a godfather position on Superman, which besides from the Batfranchise is the linchpin of DC Comics franchise characters. David Goyer wrote a script. Several of these directors have movie commitments like Liebesman, which make then unlikely. Nolan has already started meeting with candidates and will submit his choice to the studio within the next few weeks. Warner Bros and Legendary have to get the picture made by 2012, because the studio stands to lose certain rights to the iconic character in 2013 after a judge ruled favorably on behalf of the heirs of Superman creator Jerry Siegel. Will tell you more when I hear it.

[Blackman]

LEt's go Duncan Jones

[SuperAl]

Synder!

[Sawyer]

Jones. I like Reeves too, but not for this.

[batman44]

Pretty good list imo. I like Jones the best.

[Aesop Rocks]

LOL!!!!! SNYDER??????? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

To be honest, Reeves is such a talented film director. Let Me In is getting nothing but positive buzz, and everyone would be lying to themselves if they said they weren't excited for him in the directors seat.

To be honest, Jones is such a talented film director. Moon got nothing but positive buzz, and everyone would be lying to themselves if they said they weren't excited for him in the directors seat.

[Sawyer]

Yeah, Snyder even being on a short list is just absurd to me.

[J.Howlett]

Matt Reeves is the most intriguing name on the list. Between Cloverfield and the serious buzz of Let Me In (in terms of vision), I would definitely entertain the idea of Reeves directing Superman.

[Aesop Rocks]

To be completely honest, this just screams Reeves. Reeves is the kind of guy that'd go out of his way to make a movie like this. Sure Jones' Moon was an amazing, wonderful film, but I have to admit that I liked Cloverfield better, and I'm going to enjoy Let Me In probably a million times more than I would Source Code.

Oh and, Reeves loves story telling, which is exactly what this movie needs. I want a Superman movie with a lot more drama than action. But I still want the action scenes to be balls to the wall awesome. Which he's proven he can do successfully in Cloverfield.

[Motown Marvel]

im very glad to see jonah is not on that list. nothing against jonah, but no ones first stab at directing should be on a film like Superman!

[mclay18]

I'm surprised to see Snyder on the list. I'm happy to see Liesbesman and Reeves on the list, but I'm not pleased with Tony Scott on the short list. I'm 50-50 on Duncan Jones.

[batman44]

Reeves would be my strong second choice and I would guess he would be good with action.

Oh, If Tony is tapped to direct expect Denzel Washington to be Lex lol.

[Aesop Rocks]

Batman44, Washington will play an ordinary guy thrown into an extraordinary situation.

"Superman, come on, I'm just an average guy...".

[solidsnake86]

So they basically waited until Nolan was done with press for Inception (which has its last premiere in Italy this weekend). Its about time and I guess that annoucement in 4 weeks will be coming, but something tells me we'll hear about whose chosen before then.

[Threshold]

I could really see this going to Reeves.

[Sawyer]

im very glad to see jonah is not on that list. nothing against jonah, but no ones first stab at directing should be on a film like Superman!

Agreed. I never got the desire to see a man who's never directed anything do Superman.

[J.Howlett]

Aesop,

Completely agree with you about Reeves. People tend to forget how strong a film, in concept and vision, Cloverfield is.

Personally, I didn't think Let The Right One In needed an American remake, but based on the trailers, it seems Reeves nailed the hell out of it.

[Aesop Rocks]

Seriously.

SUPERMAN: Directed by Matt Reeves. Starring Jon Hamm, [female lead here], [Lex Luthor here] WRITTEN BY: John Nolan, and PRODUCED BY: Christopher Nolan.

I'm getting chills...

[FilmNerdJamie]

WB/Legendary are aiming for controllable directors? Never heard that before.

[Project862006]

why is snyder on list absurd lol

solid director

great with visuals and sfx and action

great work with comic book movies and very faithful

all films done with WB

[Aesop Rocks]

And there goes the fun of this thread.

[Project862006]

:dry:

whatever

[terry78]

I'd go with Reeves right now, because I think he deserves it after Cloverfield, and Let Me In is getting some good buzz.

[Aesop Rocks]

Jones is a talented director too, but this just doesn't seem like something he could do.

[Showtime]

I personally would love Jones to get the gig, loved "Moon".

I think that Jonathan Liebesman makes the most sense, however the whole Clash of Titans sequel might get in the way.

Also a big possibility none of these dudes get the gig. However, this is great that there is something to talk about.

[OptimusPrime114]

Jones is a talented director too, but this just doesn't seem like something he could do.

Nobody expected Joss Whedon to direct the Avengers and look what happened!

[Project862006]

just no tony scott

his films all look the same

[Aesop Rocks]

Joss Whedon wasn't on the short-list, was he?

[Paste Pot Pete]

Okay, well...

To be honest, the only name on the list I'm surprised at is Liebesman. Although I guess I shouldn't be, since WB is also inexplicably pimping him out to be the director of Clash 2. With nothing but low-rent turds like Texas Chainsaw: The Beginning and Darkness Falls to his name, it's all kind of baffling.

Duncan Jones certainly has great talent, though nothing in Moon screams Superman. Still, he's a young talent with great potential, not unlike a certain Mr. Nolan circa Memento...


Zach Snyder's Superman would certainly be gorgeous, and faithful (maybe to a fault) to the comics, but I haven't seen the heart required for Superman in his previous work, which has all come off as pretty cold to me (although Legend of the Guardians seems like a turn in the right direction).

Tony Scott has been exercising style over substance in the last decade plus; not sure I'd like to see his Superman anymore than Michael Bay's.

Matt Reeves handled Cloverfield's epic nature quite well, even though I didn't care much for the movie. Let Me In is looking to be much better than I expected a remake to turn out to be. The potential's there for him.

I guess, by default, I'd go with Duncan Jones. And finally...let go of my foolish hopes for a Spielberg or Darabont Superman.

[Eddie Dean]

Love seeing Jones there.

[Rezzo]

I'm all for Duncan Jones getting it. :up:

[Sawyer]

Either Reeves or Jones would be good by me.


Just not Snyder.

[mclay18]

Either Reeves or Jones would be good by me.


Just not Snyder.

I agree.

[terry78]

Aren't some of you that were bashing Jones about preferring older actors supporting him in this thread now? If he gets the gig, you know we could get a Kingdom Come Supes. :awesome:

[Project862006]

dont care i will stand alone as a Snyder supporter he is getting bashed in here for god knows why:huh:

[rogue trooper]

Zack Snyder. "Legend of The Guardians" looks like he might show he has the heart and soul for the heroics of Supes. 300 and Watchmen show he has the appropriate visuals.

[Project862006]

dont get me wrong i am sure moon is great have it on dvd yet to watch it but how does basically a character piece of 1 man on a space ship portray a superman film is he a good storyteller and good sci director?

yes sure. but so was Singer

at least marc webb a small time indie director like duncan had the relationship and light heart of spiderman in 500 days of summer

nolan had the dark serious tone in his previous films to show he could handle batman

just my opinion of course

[Seen]

Duncan Jones all the way, baby.

[bunk]

Okay, well...

To be honest, the only name on the list I'm surprised at is Liebesman. Although I guess I shouldn't be, since WB is also inexplicably pimping him out to be the director of Clash 2. With nothing but low-rent turds like Texas Chainsaw: The Beginning and Darkness Falls to his name, it's all kind of baffling.

Duncan Jones certainly has great talent, though nothing in Moon screams Superman. Still, he's a young talent with great potential, not unlike a certain Mr. Nolan circa Memento...


Zach Snyder's Superman would certainly be gorgeous, and faithful (maybe to a fault) to the comics, but I haven't seen the heart required for Superman in his previous work, which has all come off as pretty cold to me (although Legend of the Guardians seems like a turn in the right direction).

Tony Scott has been exercising style over substance in the last decade plus; not sure I'd like to see his Superman anymore than Michael Bay's.

Matt Reeves handled Cloverfield's epic nature quite well, even though I didn't care much for the movie. Let Me In is looking to be much better than I expected a remake to turn out to be. The potential's there for him.

I guess, by default, I'd go with Duncan Jones. And finally...let go of my foolish hopes for a Spielberg or Darabont Superman.

Pretty much sums it up.

[Mr. Earle]

Yeah, Snyder even being on a short list is just absurd to me.
Nolan probably wanted to have some fun.

- Hey, i bet you guys 100 bucks that Snyder will suggest gore + nudity + slowmo and have no great idea of his own.
- You're on!

[bunk]

Nolan probably wanted to have some fun.

- Hey, i bet you guys 100 bucks that Snyder will suggest gore + nudity + slowmo and have no great idea of his own.
- You're on!

This wasn't funny in the other thread either.

[Seen]

Duncan Jones or Matt Reeves. None of the other picks really pique my interest.

[RachelDawes]

Synder!

Anyone but Snyder! :oldrazz:

Seriously, anyone but him.

im very glad to see jonah is not on that list. nothing against jonah, but no ones first stab at directing should be on a film like Superman!

I didn't even notice that. Another reason to like this list. :up:

[Seen]

Also, for those who don't think Jones could handle a movie like Superman, just wait until you see Source Code. I read the script, and it was absolutely incredible. It'll be the thriller/action movie that proves Jones can handle a movie like Superman.

[SuperAl]

dont understand the Synder hate. 300 is friggin amazing, Watchmen was good not great but then again i didnt care for the story. Dawn of the Dead is awesome, sucker punch looks sweet even tho ive never liked female hero movies. He'd make Superman badass, keep in mind he'll be working with Nolan and Goyer so theyll be able to give input on character development. We already got stuck with "heart" in SR and it was boring as hell.

[JokerLedger]

Duncan Jones.
LET'S DO THIS!!!

[Excel]

Moon director directing Jon Hamm in a Superman movie perhaps?

*dies*

[Seen]

Also, since Clint Mansell is an oft collaborator of Duncan Jones, if he does get the gig it will likely mean he'd score the movie. A Clint Mansell Superman score is just... too tantalizing to pass up.

[terry78]

I think a lot of fanboys are trying to save Synder for the upcoming TMNT flick anyways.

[RachelDawes]

dont understand the Synder hate. 300 is friggin amazing, Watchmen was good not great but then again i didnt care for the story. Dawn of the Dead is awesome, sucker punch looks sweet even tho ive never liked female hero movies. He'd make Superman badass, keep in mind he'll be working with Nolan and Goyer so theyll be able to give input on character development. We already got stuck with "heart" in SR and it was boring as hell.

Everything I've seen out of Snyder suggests that his style is too dark and he favors gore and sex too much to be a good fit for Superman. Plus, he said in an interview that he didn't think it would be possible to sell an earnest character like Superman to modern audiences.

[Happy Jack]

Either Reeves or Jones would be good by me.


Just not Snyder.
Oh, definitely. Snyder would be on the sort list of directors who I don't want anywhere near this.

[KaptainKrypton]

I'd vote for Duncan Jones. The rest are extremely "meh." Tony Scott is the Michael Bay of his day and Snyder is just like Frank Miller in that he wouldn't get Superman if you drew him a blueprint (this is based on his past comments). It bewilders me that Warner is still dumb enough to hand the reins of Superman to those who aren't even remotely qualified. Singer at least liked Superman. Where are the Wachowskis? At least those nerds have probably read one of his books. This is not instilling more confidence from my end.

[Happy Jack]

My post disappeared, then it came back.

???

[terry78]

I love how Snyder used to be a fanboy fave and suddenly he's fallen out of favor.

[Excel]

If its opening in December, they should go with the most artsy dude.

If summer, tony scott.

[MessiahDecoy123]

Nothing Reeves or Jones have done so far have proven they're well suited for an epic superhero movie.

Cloverfield is nothing special and Sam Rockwell carried Moon. That hardly makes these directors a better fit than Snyder who has alot more comic book movie and SFX experience.

[souvlaki]

This is just weird timing. I am nearly forty minutes in to watching Moon on Bluray right now and was thinking how great of director Jones is, and how much I'd love to see him work with a bigger budget. I just happened to start browse the board while watching the movie and come here to see this. He reminds me a lot of Nolan around the time he was hired for Begins. Relative unknown, unproven with action movies but has made a very highly acclaimed independent film. Very impressive visual style, very good storytelling skills, and in my opinion made one of the best sci-fi films of the last ten years, and with practically no budget. With the right script I think he could do an amazing job with Superman.

[bunk]

I love how Snyder used to be a fanboy fave and suddenly he's fallen out of favor.

It's a little odd considering he turned in arguably the closest adaption of any comic book story. He doesn't seem to give a crap about Superman though. For all I know, none of those directors give a crap about Superman.

[Sawyer]

I love how Snyder used to be a fanboy fave and suddenly he's fallen out of favor.

It's not even a matter of him falling out of favor with me. I just dont want him for Superman.

[Paroxysm]

I'd go with Matt Reeves.

[Catman]

WB/Legendary are aiming for controllable directors? Never heard that before.

Doesn't that give Zack Snyder the edge? He already has a history with the studio: 300, Watchmen, Legend of the Guardians, Sucker Punch.

I love how Snyder used to be a fanboy fave and suddenly he's fallen out of favor.

That's fanboys for you. Remember when Sam Raimi was beloved and now he's considered the worst thing that ever happened to Spider-Man.

[Frankenmation]

That's fanboys for you. Remember when Sam Raimi was beloved and now he's considered the worst thing that ever happened to Spider-Man.

Have you ever considered that maybe some fanboys have just never liked Zack Snyder to begin with? Same with Sam Raimi?

[Lighthouse]

I like 3 out of the 5.

Reeves would be my top pick just based on product. I really enjoyed Cloverfield, and Let Me In is supposed to be pretty amazing. I also loved Duncan Jones "Moon" and wouldn't mind seeing him get the job. I think Snyder could make a great Superman movie(I loved Watchmen, liked 300), but I'm not sure I'd want him based on his previous comments. When asked about it earlier, he didn't seem to thrilled at the prospect. So unless he's suddenly become really excited about doing it, I'd prefer him to pass on this. I'm a little mystified by this interest in Jonathan Liebesman. His first two movies are pretty terrible, and his Battle Los Angles doesn't appeal to me at all. I've have a real dislike for Tony Scott's movie making style, and haven't enjoyed any of his movies since True Romance.

[Aesop Rocks]

Snyder simply isn't the best for the job.

I mean, unless you two go out of your way to see unnecessary slow-motion scenes.

[Blackman]

Snyder is good for other movies, not Superman

[Parker Wayne]

Guys, Zack Snyder already mentioned how he wouldn't be right for the project and already turned it down.

Calm down.

I like the inclusion of Duncan Jones and Matt Reeves though.

[Sawyer]

Snyder simply isn't the best for the job.

I mean, unless you two go out of your way to see unnecessary slow-motion scenes.

I mean, dont get me wrong, I'd be all for it if it means seeing an ackwardly staged sex scene between Supes and Lois, but this is neither the time nor the place for it. :o

[Paroxysm]

I don't think Jones would take it though, it's too big of a project.

[GreenKToo]

Reeves or Jones for me.
How crazy would it be if Reeves got it. George Reeves, Christopher Reeve, then Matt Reeves.

[Aesop Rocks]

!!! D: Take it back!

[Aesop Rocks]

I mean, dont get me wrong, I'd be all for it if it means seeing an ackwardly staged sex scene between Supes and Lois, but this is neither the time nor the place for it. :o

Yeah, set to something like In The Air Tonight by Phil Collins.

[Mr. Earle]

This wasn't funny in the other thread either.
I posted it in another thread? So what?

Maybe its that time of the month for you because i dont see why you had to post a mean reply like that.

[Project862006]

nvm according to latino review snyder already declined

snyder would be good for flash haha


what shocks me is that Mcteigue is not on the list

[Aesop Rocks]

That kind of blows my mind.

Snyder, infamous for slowo, doing a movie about the fastest person ever?

[GreenKToo]

hey, it would be the fastest slo-mo ever filmed.

[Aesop Rocks]

That itself is enough to rip a portal to a bad place.

[FaT_tONle]

I think it is laughable how an animated family movie like Garhul convinces some of you guys Snyder can put forth the emotion and substance this project desperately craves. Thankfully he won't touch this, or so we think...

[Project862006]

We recently reported that Guillermo Del Toro turned down the chance to direct the "Superman" reboot, and now, Snyder has added that he turned down the gig as well. "I think we talked about Superman a long time ago," he recalled. "I'm a fan. I don't know what's happening with it now. I just wasn't sure how to do it."


Snyder turned this job down awhile ago lol

[Aesop Rocks]

Well, how he has an idea of how to do it. :o

[Project862006]

huh?

[Aesop Rocks]

nevermind. I'm going to bed.

[GreenKToo]

Lol, that was my attempt at sarcasm. I don't want synder.

[LightningFlash]

Duncan Jones FTW.

[Project862006]

Uh Oh:awesome::dry:

Nolan spoke at the LAFF this year, the director listed Tony Scott as one his biggest influences. The director made it clear that he strongly admires Scott’s work

[batsfan81]

Jones or Reeves would be my picks.

[LightningFlash]

Uh Oh:awesome::dry:

That doesn't mean anything. He also said James Bond inspired him to make Inception, but he's not interested in making the next Bond film.

[Anita18]

Also, since Clint Mansell is an oft collaborator of Duncan Jones, if he does get the gig it will likely mean he'd score the movie. A Clint Mansell Superman score is just... too tantalizing to pass up.
Okay, I could get behind that. -drools- :awesome:

[rdh007]

I distinctly remember mentioning Tony Scott before Singer was named. I am glad to see his name on this list I'm gonnna say he or David Bowie'
s kid would be my choice (of said list) to let a man fly.

[rdh007]

I distinctly remember mentioning Tony Scott before Singer was named. I am glad to see his name on this list I'm gonnna say he or David Bowie'
s kid would be my choice (of said list) to let a man fly.

[ComicChick]

That doesn't mean anything. He also said James Bond inspired him to make Inception, but he's not interested in making the next Bond film.

http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/nolan-says-hed-love-to-do-bond/

:huh:

[LightningFlash]

New to me, lol.

But, I would keep Mendes over Nolan for the next Bond flick anyways.

[louiebling$]

Reeves hands down

[Excel]

My choice is whomever Nolan likes the most.

[Project862006]

i like reeves the most

[Lighthouse]

nvm according to latino review snyder already declined

snyder would be good for flash haha


what shocks me is that Mcteigue is not on the list

:facepalm: El Guapo just had to mention Brandon Routh and Tom Welling at the end of that article, didn't he?

[Lighthouse]

I distinctly remember mentioning Tony Scott before Singer was named. I am glad to see his name on this list I'm gonnna say he or David Bowie'
s kid would be my choice (of said list) to let a man fly.

Duncan Jones - Son of David Bowie
Tony Scott - Directed David Bowie in "The Hunger"
Christopher Nolan - Directed David Bowie in "The Presitge".
Zach Snyder - In the Studio 54 scene in "Watchmen", you can see David Bowie in the background.

Coincidence????:wow:





(Yeah, probably.)

[Sawyer]

Duncan Jones - Son of David Bowie
Tony Scott - Directed David Bowie in "The Hunger"
Christopher Nolan - Directed David Bowie in "The Presitge".
Zach Snyder - In the Studio 54 scene in "Watchmen", you can see David Bowie in the background.

Coincidence????:wow:





(Yeah, probably.)

Not a coincidence. Bowie will obviously be playing Lex Luthor. :awesome:

[terry78]

Duncan Jones - Son of David Bowie
Tony Scott - Directed David Bowie in "The Hunger"
Christopher Nolan - Directed David Bowie in "The Presitge".
Zach Snyder - In the Studio 54 scene in "Watchmen", you can see David Bowie in the background.

Coincidence????:wow:









(Yeah, probably.)


Bowie.

Knife.

Now THIS is a knife.

Crocodile Dundee.

Australia.

Heath Ledger.

Played Joker in TDK.

Directed by.....Nolan! :wow:

[DCUmoviepage]

Despite the blablabla from the haters, Snyder would be good, but recently he has said he is not interested to do this film. Tony Scott will direct the adaptation of a copy of Batman, Nemesis, it excludes him from the run.Jonathan Liebesman as doing Clash of Titans 2 already, and the production dates between CotT2 and of Superman will be praticle the same, difficulting to him direct.For me, who has strong chances are Duncan Jones and Matt Reeves, if one of these is chosen will be great!

[Lighthouse]

Not a coincidence. Bowie will obviously be playing Lex Luthor. :awesome:

I.....could honestly see that working.

[Sawyer]

If he was younger, he'd be a crazy awesome Brainiac.

[Paste Pot Pete]

Nah. Bowie as Jor-El. :wow:

[Lone]

Matt Reeves FTW.

[Mr. Earle]

Cillian Murphy as Superman and Bowie as everyone else. You know you'd watch it!

Should i throw in Rockwell as Lois?

[Catman]

Have you ever considered that maybe some fanboys have just never liked Zack Snyder to begin with? Same with Sam Raimi?

Of course, but there has been a lot more hate since 2007.

[LadyVader]

I'm going with Matt Reeves. I liked Cloverfield, and I've been hearing really good things about Let me in. The others have all kinds of baggage, and as much as I like Tony Scott, he's not the most adept at infusing movies with heart and soul. And I don't see him working well with Nolan either. On that note, Duncan Jones is actually one of the youngest candidates and I think he'd get along the best with Nolan.

[Frankenmation]

Of course, but there has been a lot more hate since 2007.

Honestly, maybe I'm wrong but I think many of the people that have been hating on Sam Raimi since SM3 are those that never liked him on Spider-Man to begin with, and thus they expressed their dislike around 2007 because they knew that no one would get outraged since SM3 was a disappointment to many. That movie was just the icing on the ****** cake for them.

[craigdbfan]

I don't understand the hate towards Snyder. Some have been even worse since Watchmen

This is coming from someone who had read the mini series before the film.

It was incredibly faithful (maybe to its detriment) and was great to just see some of the panels from the GN come to life on the big screen.

He gets an disproportionate amount of hate.

[Frankenmation]

I don't understand the hate towards Snyder. Some have been even worse since Watchmen

This is coming from someone who had read the mini series before the film.

It was incredibly faithful (maybe to its detriment) and was great to just see some of the panels from the GN come to life on the big screen.

He gets an disproportionate amount of hate.

Because there is more to making a comic book movie than just great visuals and being faithful to the source material.

[cabel]

I wouldn't mind Snyder if he changed his mind.

Snyder is capable of crafting incredible visuals and action scenes. But as mention before, his sensabilites when it comes to sex, violence, and language don't fit with Superman. At the same time, a Superman movie likely wouldn't be more than PG-13, and Nolan and Goyer as producers would know when to reel him in.

[Michael Corleone]

Reeves or Jones would be fantastic. Snyder would probably make the most visually faithful film, but I have yet to see any heart in his films. Snyder and Scott are a lot of style and action. It really all depends on your personal preference here I guess, but the question is what kind of film Nolan is looking to have made. All out action packed or balanced action adventure with some depth. My guess would be Reeves or Jones. They just make the most sense.

[cabel]

I've yet to see Moon, but based on what I have seen, I do like the idea of Jones directing.

[Mr. Earle]

I don't understand the hate towards Snyder. Some have been even worse since Watchmen

This is coming from someone who had read the mini series before the film.

It was incredibly faithful (maybe to its detriment) and was great to just see some of the panels from the GN come to life on the big screen.

He gets an disproportionate amount of hate.I think he did a fairly good job on Watchmen, its just that all the groundwork was set for him by the comic book. Same with 300. And then i remember an interview where he expressed interest in doing TDKR. Well that doesnt sound like a guy with ideas of his own, with a vision, with creativity. Adapting a comic book page by page and capitalizing on its success is easy.

[Astrodust]

As much as I enjoyed Moon, I just don't think Duncan Jones has enough experience to direct the action needed for Superman. He could pull it off but it's too much of a gamble. I'll take Snyder or Matt Reeves from that list.

[Octoberist]

When Nolan said that Scott was his inspiration, was it actually Tony or was it Ridley. Because Nolan always talks about Ridley, especially Blade Runner. Never once has he mentioned Tony to the best of my knowledge.

[echostation]

What the hell makes Reeves and Jones qualified? I mean THIS is the best WB could come up with? **** i'd rather have Martin Campbell take a stab at it after Green Lantern. Some experienced kick ass director. I was actually for Robert Zemeckis before he turned just a little looney and too kiddy with the whole CGI film thing but I thought he would've made an excellent Superman film.

If JJ Abrams stuck to a proper adaptation instead of his lame ass script, Star Trek totally proved he can handle massive action scenes and a budget, he'd be an excellent director

Frank Darabont would be superb! I would've said Wolfgang Peterson but after seeing the script for Batman vs Superman I'm glad he's not anywhere near this as that was such a ****** script and story idea.

Ben Affleck would make I think an excellent Superman film especially given two excellent films he's directed.

If Jim Cameron wasn't so up his own arse, he would easily make at least visually the best Superman film, and I mean VISUALLY... Cameron is by FAR I think the best director when it comes to technical aspects and form, he always breaks new ground in special effects and his eye is just uncanny for visuals. Easily the best technical director around.

[Colonel Kurtz]

Too bad Ridley's committed to both of the Alien Prequels, he has much more talent than his brother. Tony will want Denzel to play Clark Kent/Superman if he makes it. I would like to see more of Duncan Jones' work besides just Moon, but he seems to be the best choice out of the lot. In terms of the tone of the movie, I would have loved to have seen a Joe Dante helmed Superman. I could also see Jeff Abrams doing it with the guidance Grant Morrison.

[Octoberist]

What the hell makes Reeves and Jones qualified? I mean THIS is the best WB could come up with? **** i'd rather have Martin Campbell take a stab at it after Green Lantern. Some experienced kick ass director. I was actually for Robert Zemeckis before he turned just a little looney and too kiddy with the whole CGI film thing but I thought he would've made an excellent Superman film.

If JJ Abrams stuck to a proper adaptation instead of his lame ass script, Star Trek totally proved he can handle massive action scenes and a budget, he'd be an excellent director

Frank Darabont would be superb! I would've said Wolfgang Peterson but after seeing the script for Batman vs Superman I'm glad he's not anywhere near this as that was such a ****** script and story idea.

Ben Affleck would make I think an excellent Superman film especially given two excellent films he's directed.

If Jim Cameron wasn't so up his own arse, he would easily make at least visually the best Superman film, and I mean VISUALLY... Cameron is by FAR I think the best director when it comes to technical aspects and form, he always breaks new ground in special effects and his eye is just uncanny for visuals. Easily the best technical director around.

I agree about Jim, Ben, and Frank. I disagree about Duncan, Matt, and JJ.

LONG LIVE JJ.

[craigdbfan]

Honestly Jones and Reeves will probably be what it comes down to it.

These two have showed incredible amount of talent with the small amount of budget money they've been given.

Both can defintely make a visually stunning film this is much confirmed.

Good to see that all those who were completely against Reeves because of his adaptation of "Let The Right One In" which is apparently a brilliant movie (100% so far in RT) in its own right have fallen into silence.

He didn't disgrace the original film adaptation or the book but did offer something that the previous two incarnation didn't. Loved the original Swedish film but the good reviews for Let Me In has defintely rekindled my interest in Reeves take on the material.

[Astrodust]

Blade Runner is probably my favorite film but Ridley Scott feels wrong for Superman to me. There is something weird about how Ridley Scott films his action. It feels undramatic and too fast or something. The action in Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, and Robin Hood were all very average. Ridley has never made a bad film, but his recent efforts don't make me a believer in him for Superman, not that he's on the list anyways.

[Colonel Kurtz]

Blade Runner is probably my favorite film but Ridley Scott feels wrong for Superman to me. There is something weird about how Ridley Scott films his action. It feels undramatic and too fast or something. The action in Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, and Robin Hood were all very average. Ridley has never made a bad film, but his recent efforts don't make me a believer in him for Superman, not that he's on the list anyways.

Ridley has been using a lot of high-contrast shots recently in action scenes giving it an unnecessary "gritty" look. But between him and his brother, I would trust Ridley. He has an uncanny eye for detail, and given the right conditions, uses the camera to paint wonderfully compelling narratives. The fact that Tony's name was even mentioned makes me believe Nolan is looking for someone that he would be accustomed to work with, the U.K connection and all.

[Kurosawa]

I like almost all those guys so it looks like a good shot at a win any way they go. Maybe Jones...I'd love to see a Superman film that was more on the cerebral side, especially if All-Star Superman is an influence and Superman himself is written as being brilliant.

[cabel]

I don't understand the hate towards Snyder. Some have been even worse since Watchmen


The way I look at it, with or without Snyder, the Watchmen movie was going to happen sooner or later. And when I think about the other versions we could have gotten, I'm glad we got Snyder's.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion on the finished product (I have my own short list of problems with the film), but I feel Snyder went the extra mile to include as much of the novel and be faithful as possible. The fact that Snyder included Black Freighter and Under the Hood in some capacity (depending on which versions you've seen) where most director's would't even acknowledge them is proof of that.

[Colonel Kurtz]

I could see David Yates as well. But my bet is that it will be Jones because of the English connection.

[General Vulcun]

Jones or Reeves, in that order.

Synder puts too much style into his films. There are moments where it feels appropiate, but then there's tons where it feels like he can't take his foot off the gas-pedal.

Tony Scott is too erratic for Superman, and like Snyder, dabbles too much FX and action.

Don't know much about Liebesman, but from what other people say his resume doesn't sound very impressive.

[flickchick85]

Yeah, I'm rooting for Reeves and Jones. Either one would make me quite happy.

I'm not familiar with Liebesman's work at all so I can't judge him, but I'm just crossing my fingers that it's NOT Snyder or Scott. I hate both of their styles. I doubt it will be either one of them though, as they won't come as cheap as the others, and since they both have more established clout they might not be as easy to "control."

*crossing fingers for Reeves and Jones*

[craigdbfan]

The way I look at it, with or without Snyder, the Watchmen movie was going to happen sooner or later. And when I think about the other versions we could have gotten, I'm glad we got Snyder's.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion on the finished product (I have my own short list of problems with the film), but I feel Snyder went the extra mile to include as much of the novel and be faithful as possible. The fact that Snyder included Black Freighter and Under the Hood in some capacity (depending on which versions you've seen) where most director's would't even acknowledge them is proof of that.

Agreed.

[Backdrifter]

WB should do everything in their power to get Abrams on this.

Goyer + The Nolans + Abrams + Superman = Wow.

[cabel]

Isn't Abrams busy with Super 8?

[Backdrifter]

Isn't Abrams busy with Super 8?

Oh I'm sure this guy is booked. I just want to dream.

[Parker Wayne]

Yeah, I'm rooting for Reeves and Jones. Either one would make me quite happy.

I'm not familiar with Liebesman's work at all so I can't judge him, but I'm just crossing my fingers that it's NOT Snyder or Scott. I hate both of their styles. I doubt it will be either one of them though, as they won't come as cheap as the others, and since they both have more established clout they might not be as easy to "control."

*crossing fingers for Reeves and Jones*

But Snyder said... Oh never mind.

[Octoberist]

Remember, never say never in Hollywood..

[flickchick85]

But Snyder said... Oh never mind.
As I said, I don't think he's likely at all, but either way, I don't want him on this.

And don't forget, Joss Whedon also once said he wouldn't be interested in The Avengers. Octoberist has it right - "never" is a pretty meaningless term in Hollywood.

[Octoberist]

when money speaks, and deals will give you the advantage at the studio, then you'll say yes. For example, if Duncan Jones could make a deal with WB, that he'll do Superman IF they can finance his next film (Let's say 'Mute'), then they say yes to it...sure he'll do it.

[jmc]

Jones for sure, Moon is a great example of doing a lot with a little, love to see what he can do with a Superman sized budget. Snyder? Well to me, that's proof Nolan has a sense of humour. :woot:

[elgaz]

Hmm I'm not really sure about Jones. Moon was a fantastic film, don't get me wrong, but very very different - small set, small cast, claustrophobic at times. He directed it well but half of the film's success was also due to the acting and script. It doesn't mean he's suddenly the perfect director to tackle a global icon like Superman, with a film which will likely boast huge sets, busy Metropolis streets, etc. It's really the opposite kind of film to Moon.

Personally I'd be opting for Reeves.

[matrix_ghost]

I still wanna know why Nolan is interested in TOny Scott as the guy just pales in comparison to Ridley as well the fact that he fully embraces shakey cam filming. SOmething i dislike....alot.

But i'm hoping for Reeves and Jones. Both are young talented directors and unlike Snyder or Scott who have made their place in hollywood , these guys are just starting with their careers. Superman could easily be the big movie that the need get their big start.

Also i get the impression that Nolan is meeting with directors that both he likes and WB likes.
SNyder's name has been mentioned frequently with Superman and WB has been impressed with Liebesmann because they really wanted him to direct Clash Of The Titans 2.
It's not anything that several names are considered for a project. After all the same thing happens with casting actors. Look at Batman. Nolan said that Bale was the first actor he saw and was impressed by him. Yet WB also asked him to look at other candidates. Even though Nolan went with his first choice , he still discovered Cillian Murphy .

I think that Jones and Scott are Nolan's choices whereas SNyder , Liebesmann are WB choices. Reeves might be a both Nolan's and WB pick because of Let Me In getting rave reviews.

I'm still surprised that Yates's name wasn't mentioned but who knows that there could be several more names being considering by Nolan and WB.

[Dave40]

I say Matt Reeves!!.He is so talented:awesome:.

[GinsterHead]

Nolan.
Jones.
SUPERMAN.
MAKE IT HAPPEN.

Oh, Matt Reeves gets my vote, too. :awesome:

[bapi]

Reese or Jones and I'll be happy.

[truth]

Okay, I have read through your posts and I have been intersted by the nonsense written

Why does the director have to be young and an up and comer? We ain't in the 70's when people made real films and you could get a young worthy talent. I don't want a Superman to be anything like Cloverfield or anything like Scott or Snyder's films. Further more, why the heck is Nolan acting as jude and jury? Oh, because he did Batman? Batman and Superman are as different as you can get.

Donner is still alive and to this day, no Director can come close to Spielberg. You want Superman done right? Go with the proven old-timers who will know how to bring the heat for today with Superman.

All those names on the list including Nolan's is quit frankly a joke.

Thank you

[Project862006]

imo it is down to reeves and Jones and it is reeves hand down for me

Jones seems more suited for a serious darker film

[bunk]

My choice is whomever Nolan likes the most.

Me too. Bottom line: without reading the script and knowing what direction WB wants to go, it's impossible to say who would be the best fit.

[MessiahDecoy123]

It would be cool if each of the contenders did a Superman themed short film and the fans voted for the best one.

Based on Moon alone, Jones would make a boring Superman movie.

[akfj]

It would be cool if each of the contenders did a Superman themed short film and the fans voted for the best one.

No thanks. The fans don't even know what they want. Fans would still complain that their director of choice wasn't chosen through a fan vote.

[DorkyFresh]

As much as I enjoyed Moon, I just don't think Duncan Jones has enough experience to direct the action needed for Superman. He could pull it off but it's too much of a gamble. I'll take Snyder or Matt Reeves from that list.
sums up my feeling exactly. i have no doubt Jones would get the character of Superman down, but i'm not sure he'd be able to get EVERYTHING ELSE. Moon is a great character study but there almost no action and he's also been caught saying he's tired of guys in their 20's being the leads in movies, which would eliminate half the actors up for the role.

if Jones gets it then i'll know that they'll nail Superman's character but i'll be worried about almost everything else. if Snyder gets it i'll know that he'll nail the action and feel of Superman, but i'll be worried it'll be slow mo overload. honestly, out of that list Reeves is my favorite because Cloverfield was a really well done movie despite the lack of strong actors. plus, he's worked with J.J. Abrams...who i think should direct ALL movies, hehe

[dark_b]

Dorky you said that JJ should direct all movies.

does this mean that you think he is the best director on this planet right now?

[DorkyFresh]

i was semi-joking. of course no one can replace the likes of Nolan, Cameron, Scorcese, Cuaron, etc......but i think JJ is an enormously talented director who could probably direct any genre of movie, big or small. his movies give me the same feelings that i used to get when i saw Spielberg's films.

[dark_b]

aha ok.


about the list.
lets not forget how hollywood works. it could be that 1 week before they have to pick, a new director will be added to the list. you never know what will happen. look at Reynolds and GL.

everybody except Snyder are very young directors. so its impossible to know what type of directors they are.

really in 90's Peter Jackson was the perfect director for LOTR. so maybe one of them could be the perfect director for superman. of course Snyder is not. in the last years and with the Owl movie he showed to me that he is only able to force slow-mo in every shot possible. so no thanks for him as superman. he should make movies like Sucker Punch.

[jmc]

Anyone worried that Jones only being able to handle the character driven stuff needs to chill a bit, that's the most important aspect of any film, having a lack of experience in big budget actions movies is not a liability. You've gotta give directors like that a start in big budget movies at some point, it was only a few years ago another character driven director with only a hand full of films under his belt emerged to take charge of a near dead superhero franchise, and now he's the one supplying this list to the WB suits.

[DIRECTOR]

None of the directors I think are suitable for Superman based on their prior works, maybe Snyder????

[Aesop Rocks]

LOL!!!!!!!! You're funny! :)

[dark_b]

Anyone worried that Jones only being able to handle the character driven stuff needs to chill a bit, that's the most important aspect of any film, having a lack of experience in big budget actions movies is not a liability. You've gotta give directors like that a start in big budget movies at some point, it was only a few years ago another character driven director with only a hand full of films under his belt emerged to take charge of a near dead superhero franchise, and now he's the one supplying this list to the WB suits.but there were a lot of complaints about the action :cwink:

dont forget this movie, this last chance superman i am desperate movie needs to own everyone with the action . if not........................then Zion will fall :csad:

[The Sage]

The only two people from this list whose names I recognize are Matt Reeves Tony Scott, and Zack Snyder. Out of those three, I'd say Matt Reeves is the guy I'd go for. I liked his direction in Cloverfield.

Haven't seen Moon so no comment on Jones.

[Paul-el]

Look at it this way -- we wanted news, we finally got some. And nowhere in the article does it say these are the final candidates, only that they're some of the names they're looking at. I, for one, like Matt Reeves -- I have a feeling LET ME IN is going to be pretty creepy (although that's not what a Superman film is going for).

Anyone want to make a poll of the aforementioned names so far?

[bgshw44]

out of that list, reeves definately in my book

[Changeling]

Reeves or Jones.
And Bowie for Brainiac, it doesnt matter how old Brainiac is.

[Paul-el]

Yeah, but which version of Brainiac?

[jmc]

but there were a lot of complaints about the action :cwink:


Small price to pay for a good film. :)

[Marvin]

I personally don't have a preference here but I'd like to say this.

someone said they don't like snyder's sensibilities when it comes to sex and violence?
He was direction freaking Watchmen. Alot of people need to get their heads on straight about what it is that tha director on a heavily produced film like this actually does.

Also the smaller the director the less influence they will have(see origins) lukily thie film has pretty smart producers.

Lastly, with goyer and nolan together the script will be there, I'll be damned if I get another non visualist to shoot the daily planet like it's an episode of smallville. As far as the choices:

Reeves did one abrams produces(always brings strong concepts) shaky cam monster movie that was unwatchable by many and a REMAKE of one of the greatest films ever adapted from one of the coolest stories ever...of course it's getting good buzz two people have already showed him how to make the movie.

Jones screams indie superman(this time without the kid)

Snyder is overstaylized but with a good script it would certainly be an event. Let's face it apart from a few mistakes Watchmen captured the tone pretty well, just like that owl movie will capture it's tone pretty well.

Scott has made some thrillers with lame scripts and has done alot of experiment with his direction, I doubt he would shoot superman like domino and honestly, his lighting system in the eighties is surely missed. For example take the monaco scene in iron man2 and put it in Days Of Thunder.

I don't know the other guy

I'm by no means pushing for snyder, even out of these choices but the reality is that He's obviously WB's choice(nolan is giving them a list to choose from) and he's already got Joh Hamm under his thumb (it all depends on how well let me in does box office wise(fall release).

Overall the list is pretty meh, I figured with nolans pull we'd be getting another top tier caliber director ala jackson, ridley, Verbinsky etc.

[Symbiotic]

I guess Jonah Nolan's out of the running then? From that list, I'd go with Snyder.

[Rust]

Matt Reeves seem like the most ideal of the pack. You know he can deliver action, intensity, FX and character.

Duncan Jones I'm uncertain about. He seems like the most interesting and "artistic" choice maybe. I'm sure he's got something to offer here. Maybe he's the spiritual and "fantastic" counterpart to Nolan.

My vote goes for these two since the rest dont seem strong, interesting or appropriate enough.

Oh yeah... FREAKIN' FANTASTIC WITH SOME NEWS FINALLY!

[djkris]

Snyder. I was considering him a long time ago. Seriously, if you want an outlandish, over-the-top, action packed Superman movie, with aliens, entire city blocks destroyed, comic stuff in general, Snyder is the man. His tone was wrong for "Watchmen" - still, a fine adaptation IMO, but with Nolan holding a leash and a good script, Snyder can do wonders.

My second choice would be Reeves. There is the irony of his surname connected to the Superman mythos (dare I say "curse"?), but apart from that, I loved "Cloverfield", it was a refreshing take on the monster movie genre.

[HighFivingMF]

everybody except Snyder are very young directors. so its impossible to know what type of directors they are.
http://moviechopshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/tony-scott.jpg

[That-Guy]

I don't have a problem with any of these guys, really. They all have done at least one movie I've liked (except for Jonathan Liebesman...haven't seen any of his films, although I'm interested in Battle: Los Angeles). Some of them seem to be odd choices but at least there aren't any Chris Columbuses or McGs on that list, IMO.

[Lobo]

I'm going to go with wanting that Liebsman guy. He seems the most likely to me, an Matt Reeves would be my 2nd choice.

[GreenKToo]

They are controllable directors, the whole lot. I seem to remember someone saying thats what WB wanted this time around.

[solidsnake86]

Not that I'm advocating Synder but its not like if he was chosen it would be the worst decision in the world. He said he didn't know how to do superman but he probably said that when WB wanted him to come up with the story as well. He doesn't have to worry about how to pull it off when the script is already done, they need someone to point and shoot what they want and visually I can see why they included synder on the list. Its good to hear rumours though and we're in for some good ones with batman and superman both being filmed next year.

[That-Guy]

Yeah, I agree that at least finally we're getting some rumors/news. I was beginning to think that this film was never going to happen.

[X Knight]

OMG!!! Can this be??!!

Is it some actual news??!!

Some sign that this project is still moving forward??!!

as for the mentioned directors, I really have no opinion on them.......as I'm not that familiar with their work. The only person whose films I've seen would be Snyder. But, I'm not too sure if I want him for Superman.

And didn't Snyder say recently that he passed on Superman?

[Paul-el]

OMG!!! Can this be??!!

Is it some actual news??!!

Some sign that this project is still moving forward??!!

as for the mentioned directors, I really have no opinion on them.......as I'm not that familiar with their work. The only person whose films I've seen would be Snyder. But, I'm not too sure if I want him for Superman.

And didn't Snyder say recently that he passed on Superman?


I think that was before Nolan and Goyer signed on with a story ready to go.

[Paste Pot Pete]

While, as I said, I don't really want him for the job, I don't get the "Snyder is too obsessed with violence and sex" argument.

Snyder, in his adaptations, is doing just that - adapting. Watchmen: The Movie is gory and features scenes of sexuality because - surprise! - Watchmen: The Book is gory and features scenes of sexuality.

Superman is NOT gory or sex-filled, hence it stands to reason that a Snyder adaptation probably wouldn't contain such elements.

[Antonello Blueberry]

He said it a few days ago at his new movie conference.

[Astrodust]

It would be cool if each of the contenders did a Superman themed short film and the fans voted for the best one.

Based on Moon alone, Jones would make a boring Superman movie.

At least someone else said it. There is no evidence to think that Jones can handle an action oriented film or know what to do with a big budget. Even some experienced director's are poor at action. Moon was a good film for what it was. Apply it to Superman and we will probably get a slower paced Superman Returns.

Abrams would be nice, or at least his cinematographer from Star Trek. The colors in that film would look great for Superman. The more I think about it, Matt Reeves is the strongest choice from that list. Let Me In is looking awesome and he has the experience necessary to do the action needed.

[Paste Pot Pete]

I'm going to go with wanting that Liebsman guy. He seems the most likely to me, an Matt Reeves would be my 2nd choice.

Why would you want him, and why is he the most likely? He's by far the worst choice. He's a horror director, and of two of the worst (major studio, theater-released) horror movies of the last decade.

[Astrodust]

None of the directors I think are suitable for Superman based on their prior works, maybe Snyder????

You could say that about Richard Donner.

[gdw]

Man, I loved Watchmen, and enjoyed 300, but Snyder is a popcorn flick director. The main reason I loved Watchmen was because of how close it was to the books, so in other words, what made it good was what was done in the books, not necessarily anything Snyder added.

There is no way I could see him making a great Superman film. Watchable, yes, faithful, yes, but a great film, no.

I am not certain about some of the other directors, as far as doing a bigger action film. Mind you, Nolan didn't do much in that way before Begins, but I was ecstatic about him directing.

It will be intersting when this is finally announced and things start moving.

[HighFivingMF]

He's a horror director, and of two of the worst (major studio, theater-released) horror movies of the last decade.
One hasn't even been released yet, though it's getting pretty damn good reviews. You know what else got pretty damn good reviews? Cloverfield.

[That-Guy]

You could say that about Richard Donner.

Haha, very true. And from a script by Mario Puzo (The Godfather) no less!

Granted, a lot of these guys might seem like out-of-the box choices, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

[RachelDawes]

At least someone else said it. There is no evidence to think that Jones can handle an action oriented film or know what to do with a big budget. Even some experienced director's are poor at action. Moon was a good film for what it was. Apply it to Superman and we will probably get a slower paced Superman Returns.

Jones will be working from Goyer's script, so I don't think he'll have the ability to affect pacing too much.

[maenalus]

Granted, a lot of these guys might seem like out-of-the box choices, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

No, it certainly isn't. Out-of-the-box choices just ad to the anticipation.

[FilmNerdJamie]

Just going off their criteria (skilled/talented, but controllable) and from that list, I'd imagine Reeves gets the gig.

[That-Guy]

I'd be okay with Reeves. I enjoyed Cloverfield much more than I thought I would have, and Let Me In looks good. Now granted, I know that hardcore fans of Let the Right One in are boycotting the movie or whatever, but I think that people should really take a step back and consider how many times films are remade (or books are adapted again in a different country, which is really what the case is here).

Not that many people remember or care that Scorsese's brilliant film The Departed was a remake/re-imagining of Infernal Affairs. It's just the fact that whenever some film develops a cult following, everyone adopts this Thou Shalt Never Remake This Film Under Penalty of Death attitude about it. I can understand that reaction, but people need to accept that movies are a business, and there were also a LOT of people that didn't see the original.

Also, Reeves casted Let Me In brilliantly. The two leads are two of the best child film actors working right now. And he also stocked it with some great supporting actors. So that gives me faith in the project.

[dark_b]

if Reeves gets the job then he is building up hes career very smart.

first a handy action packed monster movie. then a horror movie and now a summer blockbuster.

and he has the same name like George Reeves who was the first superman right? this important for fanboys hahaha.

[Excelsior.]

great with visuals and sfx and action



Hahaha

Half the time it looks like he is copying David Ficher, other times the Wachowski siblings.

But then again, that's what he does best no? Copying other, far more talented people.

It's a little odd considering he turned in arguably the closest adaption of any comic book story.

Snyder did Sin City?

That's fanboys for you. Remember when Sam Raimi was beloved and now he's considered the worst thing that ever happened to Spider-Man.

Yes. We "fanboys" are one single entity. We are not individuals with differing opinions.

[MAN O STEEL]

What is it with people named Reeve & Reeves being involved with Superman projects. Are we to be haunted by these names forever? lol. :awesome::oldrazz:





Steve

[That-Guy]

if Reeves gets the job then he is building up hes career very smart.

first a handy action packed monster movie. then a horror movie and now a summer blockbuster.

and he has the same name like George Reeves who was the first superman right? this important for fanboys hahaha.

Yep! And remember, Keanu Reeves once did his "Superman thing" in a Matrix movie. AND if you add an "S" to the end of Christopher Reeve's name, what do you get?

IT'S DESTINY!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v142/that-guy/13032__locke_l.jpg?t=1285348226

[gdw]

Haha, very true. And from a script by Mario Puzo (The Godfather) no less!

Granted, a lot of these guys might seem like out-of-the box choices, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

And an incredibly corny script by Puzo at that.

I personally loved Cloverfield. It was executed quite well, and put you in the shoes of a regular person in a big monster film. Not the hero from nothing that eventually helps, or witnesses the defeat, of the loan wild card in the military itself. AND it made the journey of the regular people intriguing and watchable and entertaining. That's a huge task.

[terry78]

I still have to question why Snyder suddenly is toxic, though. After 300 and DOTD, people couldn't get enough of him. I say go see the owl movie this weekend, because it has gotten some good reviews as well. It's animation, but you can tell his style.

[GREEN =w= DAY]

i'm just glad that this film if getting off the ground

would be cool to have both Batman 3 and a new Superman film out in 2012

of those directors i'd go with the Moon guy

[batman44]

Snyder wouldn't be my top choice of the list, but I wouldn't complain at all if he got it.

[terry78]

This was actually mentioned at AICN, but honestly, I would like to see Ron Howard take a swing at this one, personally. That would be one choice I would not ***** about.

[That-Guy]

I still have to question why Snyder suddenly is toxic, though. After 300 and DOTD, people couldn't get enough of him. I say go see the owl movie this weekend, because it has gotten some good reviews as well. It's animation, but you can tell his style.

BECAUSE HE DIDN'T ADAPT EVERY SINGLE WORD OF DIALOGUE AND NARRATION FROM THE WATCHMEN GRAPHIC NOVEL!!!!!! HE IS A HACK!!!! :cmad:

DON'T YOU KNOW THAT EVERYONE ON THESE BOARDS WOULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB?!!! :cmad:

:hehe:

[Slamet]

It's not forbidden to say 'Del Toro'

[gdw]

I actually thoroughly enjoy Snyder's work, and will love seeing more from him. I don't think what he does would work well for Superman though.

There are even many great directors who I like far more than Snyder, but who also would not suit Superman.

I still like Burton's work, and, though it would have been interesting to see his film finished, it would not suit Superman.

[FilmNerdJamie]

I see Duncan Jones very quickly deleted a remark he made on his Twitter (http://twitter.com/ManMadeMoon) account just a few minutes ago.

About Superman... Im going to say something really cheesy; Cant talk about it, but an honor to be on the list. Interesting times!

And Matt Reeves is playing coy with JoBlo (http://www.joblo.com/index.php?id=34014).

[Astrodust]

Jones will be working from Goyer's script, so I don't think he'll have the ability to affect pacing too much.

You could say the same about the other directors. Just cause they are working with other talented people doesn't mean they don't need to be experienced. Nolan isn't going to hold anyone's hand and he shouldn't need to. Jones is probably at the bottom of the list for me. Why gamble with someone with such little experience?

[solidsnake86]

Jamie hadn't you suggested Reeves to take over star trek if JJ didnt want to do it? Of the list it seems like Reeves and Jones are the ones people could see taking on this project with more people leaning to Reeves. Should be interesting how it plays out. If that announcement is going to happen in late October (if you go by the 4 weeks) we'll be finding out soon I'm sure, especially because Nolan should probably be turning his attention to batman very soon.

[Slamet]

Movies is always a gambling, you'll never know.

[FilmNerdJamie]

Jamie hadn't you suggested Reeves to take over star trek if JJ didnt want to do it?

That I did, bud. He's an Abrams alum and just not certain the man-in-glasses will pull off both Super 8 (Summer 2011 - May if I had to guess) and Star Trek 2 (June 29, 2012) under such a tight time frame. Yes, it's possible and I hope he returns to helm the Trek sequel. But...don't know.

[GreenKToo]

I can't wait until the director is announced and we finally get an idea on what kind of Superman actor they want, ie, younger, older, known, unknown.

[LightningFlash]

I'd prefer an older Superman, imo.

When I heard that Jon Hamm was rumored, I was excited because that's what we need; we need an older Superman to address how classic the hero is, and plus, Superman isn't even supposed to start out in the new reboot.

[hatebox]

The fact that Nolan's 'godfather' of the project suggests he'll have a pretty big say in the direction of the movie, so the director is probably going to be someone... 'controllable', for lack of a better word. If that's the case both Jones and Reeves would fit the bill, and I'd be happy with them...

[I SEE SPIDEY]

I'd go for Reeves. I was one of the few who really liked CloverField and felt that it was well directed.

I wouldn't mind Jones either although I'm not a huge fan of Moon. It's a good performance movie and nothing else IMHO.

I just hope that the Jonah Nolan rumors stop.

[That-Guy]

I'd prefer an older Superman, imo.

When I heard that Jon Hamm was rumored, I was excited because that's what we need; we need an older Superman to address how classic the hero is, and plus, Superman isn't even supposed to start out in the new reboot.

Well, if the guy who did Moon gets it, then I would say that the chances of an older Superman are considerably higher, given what he recently said about 20-something actors.

[supermankal-el]

DICK DONNER LOL:woot:

[solidsnake86]

I can't wait until the director is announced and we finally get an idea on what kind of Superman actor they want, ie, younger, older, known, unknown.

And just think a few days ago you were all doom and gloom, lol. Although after we hear what director it is I have a feeling we wont be hearing casting for a while, on the other hand Nolan may want to be involved with it and that would mean they would have to get going on it asap because I doubt once he starts filming batman he's going to have time for superman pre-production.

[I SEE SPIDEY]

I'm so happy that there is news/rumors. I hope it's not that horror movie director guy.

[flickchick85]

I'm so happy that there is news/rumors. I hope it's not that horror movie director guy.
Which one?

[That-Guy]

Liebesman, I guess?

[DocHoliday]

Duncan Jones is a solid director. I like Zach Snyder but he will probably do "Xerxes" next. Matt Reeves is okay I guess. Cloverfield was different and from what I have heard his remake"Let Me In" is almost shot for shot (so there's still a question there for me). Not saying he couldn't do it though, just not sure. Tony Scott is just not the right dude. Funny is the Matt Reeves up for Wolverine 2 as well?

[Sam]

Im really surprised with Snyder on that list. Surprised in a good way!

I dont understand why all the hate from some ppl with Snyder. He is talented, great with visuals and very faithfull with source material.

Guided by Nolan and his script is a win-win situation for me.

[Dark Knight]

IMO.

Reeves or Snyder should be the pick to direct and work with Nolan as the producer....EASILY!

Tony Scott is past his prime!

[Dark Knight]

Im really surprised with Snyder on that list. Surprised in a good way!

I dont understand why all the hate from some ppl with Snyder. He is talented, great with visuals and very faithfull with source material.

Guided by Nolan and his script is a win-win situation for me.






Exactly!

Him working with Nolan as producer could potentially be magical!

Working with Nolan can only help Zack become a better director and hone his overall directorial skills.

It would be a win-win situatuion for me also if Zack directs with Nolan producing.

[DocHoliday]

Im really surprised with Snyder on that list. Surprised in a good way!

I dont understand why all the hate from some ppl with Snyder. He is talented, great with visuals and very faithfull with source material.

Guided by Nolan and his script is a win-win situation for me.

He's overly stylized.. that's not a problem for me as so was David Fincher when the material needed it. Like I said I'd be open to it but I want him to do "Xerxes" and judging by his interview on LatinoReview a few days ago, that's exactly his plans.

[Dark Knight]

IMO.

Reeves or Snyder should be the pick to direct and work with Nolan as the producer....EASILY!

Tony Scott is past his prime!

[Eddie Dean]

Duncan Jones directing might just be a...

SLAM DUNK! :awesome:

[LuisTX85]

IMO.

Reeves or Snyder should be the pick to direct and work with Nolan as the producer....EASILY!


I agree!,Would be a great combo with Snyder's visuals&story telling mixed with guidance by Nolan and overall moving Snyder from the dark since Nolan has said he knows Superman ain't dark like Batman and that's one reason he won't direct it himself.

[LuisTX85]

I think a lot of fanboys are trying to save Synder for the upcoming TMNT flick anyways.

IF the new one is based on the original comics.....Which was very dark(Dark City/Batman returns/Original TMNT movie times 2 type of dark)with shady characters with lots of rain and some sexual themes.

Perfect for Snyder IMO!.

[GreenKToo]

And just think a few days ago you were all doom and gloom, lol. Although after we hear what director it is I have a feeling we wont be hearing casting for a while, on the other hand Nolan may want to be involved with it and that would mean they would have to get going on it asap because I doubt once he starts filming batman he's going to have time for superman pre-production.
Yes, I was. The lack of anything was disturbing. Now that I know it is moving forward, i'm good with some waiting.

[akfj]

Duncan Jones is a solid director. I like Zach Snyder but he will probably do "Xerxes" next. Matt Reeves is okay I guess. Cloverfield was different and from what I have heard his remake"Let Me In" is almost shot for shot (so there's still a question there for me). Not saying he couldn't do it though, just not sure. Tony Scott is just not the right dude. Funny is the Matt Reeves up for Wolverine 2 as well?

He was, but then it was reported that Fox is now looking at David Slade and Darren Aronofsky.

[Dark Knight]

Duncan Jones directing might just be a...

SLAM DUNK! :awesome:







Meh...not excited about seeing him direct....but his comments are definitely on the side of him being looked at.

[Dark Knight]

I agree!,Would be a great combo with Snyder's visuals&story telling mixed with guidance by Nolan and overall moving Snyder from the dark since Nolan has said he knows Superman ain't dark like Batman and that's one reason he won't direct it himself.







Exactly!

Nolan Producing with Snyder Directing would be a SOLID team up IMO!

Can you imagine the marketing for The Man Of Steel?

"From the Creators of The Batman Trilogy and the Director of 300 and Watchmen"

WOW!

I wouldn't mind seeing Reeves get picked either though. Cloverfield was a very underrated film IMO.

[Doctor Jones]

Reeves, Snyder, or Jones. I'd prefer Reeves out of everyone. Lisbersman better not get it.

And thank God Jonah Nolan is nowhere to be found on the list. Hopefully it's still like that. Chris would be stupid to give the entire thing to his brother.

[hippie_hunter]

Snyder's directing style just doesn't fit with Superman IMO. It worked fantastically for 300 and Watchmen, but not Superman.

[terry78]

Snyder's directing style just doesn't fit with Superman IMO. It worked fantastically for 300 and Watchmen, but not Superman.

Really? I would think that type of thing would fit perfectly. Not that I want Snyder over Reeves, but there are some iconic scenes from the books over the years that Snyder would have no issue recreating. But I suppose that's why he got bashed for Watchmen in the first place. Snyder would definitely do all that **** we've seen Supes do in the books, so that wouldn't even be a gripe.

[Happy Jack]

Im really surprised with Snyder on that list. Surprised in a good way!

I dont understand why all the hate from some ppl with Snyder. He is talented, great with visuals and very faithfull with source material.

Guided by Nolan and his script is a win-win situation for me.
He's good with visuals, I'll give him that, but when it comes to story and characters he's out of his element, and that's kind of important when you're dealing with prominent characters like Superman or the cast in Watchmen. And being faithful to the source material is more than just recreating comic panels on screen, if you don't get the meaning, the essence of the piece it's all hollow.

[Dark Knight]

Snyder's directing style just doesn't fit with Superman IMO. It worked fantastically for 300 and Watchmen, but not Superman.






I think Zacks' visual style alone is PERFECT for a Superman film actually and would be just what the doctor ordered after Singers' underwhelming bland visuals for SR.

That is where working with Chris Nolan would come into play. I'm sure Chris would suggest to Zack to ease up on the slow motion in Superman and not use it as much compared to his previous films.

I think Chris would help Zack hone his skills if you will.

It would be a good collaboration IMO.

[dark_b]

isnt Snyders style that he has slow motion almost every 24 seconds?

isnt this something that every director can order from hes crew?

[Seen]

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Directors-Respond-To-Newest-Superman-Rumors-20825.html

Duncan Jones was the first to comment. Apparently ComingSoon tweeted Jones, who is active on Twitter, and he responded with, "About Superman... I'm going to say something really cheesy; Can't talk about it, but an honor to be on the list. Interesting times!" For some reason I just find that encouraging.

Zach Snyder also commented, but debunked any interest in directing Superman (as he's stated before- WB offered him the chance to direct a Superman movie years ago, before Singer, but after Ratner/McG).

Matt Reeves lastly commented, and his general reaction was that he was surprised and had no idea what was going on. He didn't quite muster up any other noteworthy comment besides just utter shock at the rumor.

I'm pulling for Jones, so I hope this all somehow bodes well for him.

[Happy Jack]

Zach Snyder also commented, but debunked any interest in directing Superman (as he's stated before- WB offered him the chance to direct a Superman movie years ago, before Singer, but after Ratner/McG).

Even though what Singer did wasn't all that great, he was by and large the best choice out of those four.

[SuperDaniel]

Well, Snyder acts like a Superman hater and Jones thinks its an honor to be directing Superman... who will I chose?

Its either Reeves or Jones to me.

[jmc]

Jones is probably at the bottom of the list for me. Why gamble with someone with such little experience?

Coz maybe Nolan sees something that we don't. Don't forget, Chris only had 3 films under his belt before taking on Batman Begins, inexperience is not always a bad thing, in fact it's the opportunity to have fresh set of eyes look at everything. The guy showed in Moon he can do a hell of a lot with very little, imagine someone like that with 5 times the budget at their disposal.

[dark_b]

Well, Snyder acts like a Superman hater and Jones thinks its an honor to be directing Superman... who will I chose?
he acts like a superman hater? :huh::huh::huh:

[Dark Knight]

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Directors-Respond-To-Newest-Superman-Rumors-20825.html

Duncan Jones was the first to comment. Apparently ComingSoon tweeted Jones, who is active on Twitter, and he responded with, "About Superman... I'm going to say something really cheesy; Can't talk about it, but an honor to be on the list. Interesting times!" For some reason I just find that encouraging.

Zach Snyder also commented, but debunked any interest in directing Superman (as he's stated before- WB offered him the chance to direct a Superman movie years ago, before Singer, but after Ratner/McG).

Matt Reeves lastly commented, and his general reaction was that he was surprised and had no idea what was going on. He didn't quite muster up any other noteworthy comment besides just utter shock at the rumor.

I'm pulling for Jones, so I hope this all somehow bodes well for him.








What did Snyder specifically say regarding the RECENT Deadline report?

I'm not excited about Jones possibly getting the gig, but he pretty much confirmed what was reported from Deadline on that Twitter message he left. So chances are he is in the running.

[Dark Knight]

he acts like a superman hater? :huh::huh::huh:





Exactly.

Zack Snyder "acts like a Superman hater"?? WTF?

Don't know about that one! :huh:

[Dark Knight]

Well, Snyder acts like a Superman hater and Jones thinks its an honor to be directing Superman... who will I chose?

Its either Reeves or Jones to me.







Zack Snyder "acts like a Superman hater"?? WTF? :huh:

Don't know about that one!

[jmc]

I think Zacks' visual style alone is PERFECT for a Superman film actually and would be just what the doctor ordered after Singers' underwhelming bland visuals for SR.

That is where working with Chris Nolan would come into play. I'm sure Chris would suggest to Zack to ease up on the slow motion in Superman and not use it as much compared to his previous films.

I think Chris would help Zack hone his skills if you will.

It would be a good collaboration IMO.

I'm seriously doubtful Nolan would be playing 'teacher', even with a Team Nolan developed script or Nolan making suggestions Snyder is still the one who's gonna be interpreting all of it, and given his track record he's always about the visuals first not the characters, he's almost like a better version of Michael Bay. If Synder did turn out to direct Superman I can foresee the exact opposite of what Returns delivered, a visual spectacle with no heart or character. That said, I don't think Synder will get the gig, I don't think people take him seriously to be honest.

[Van Petrol]

The prosepect of Jones getting the job somewhat fills me with excitement. I wonder if David Bowie had a hand in him being considered seeing as though he's worked with Nolan and is Duncan's father. :D :oldrazz:

[Dark Knight]

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Directors-Respond-To-Newest-Superman-Rumors-20825.html

Duncan Jones was the first to comment. Apparently ComingSoon tweeted Jones, who is active on Twitter, and he responded with, "About Superman... I'm going to say something really cheesy; Can't talk about it, but an honor to be on the list. Interesting times!" For some reason I just find that encouraging.

Zach Snyder also commented, but debunked any interest in directing Superman (as he's stated before- WB offered him the chance to direct a Superman movie years ago, before Singer, but after Ratner/McG).

Matt Reeves lastly commented, and his general reaction was that he was surprised and had no idea what was going on. He didn't quite muster up any other noteworthy comment besides just utter shock at the rumor.

I'm pulling for Jones, so I hope this all somehow bodes well for him.







People seem to not understand that Snyder was approached and declined the directors gig of the next Superman film BEFORE the Nolans' and Goyer were officially involved in producing and writing this reboot Superman film.

Things could possibly change.

[SentinelMind]

From that list, Reeves seems the best. Never watched the TV series Felicity, but I did see Cloverfield and I thought the movie was pretty good. Reeves seems like he can do intimate romance/character development while including blockbuster action.

Scott seems like second best choice, but seems less inspired. I haven't seen many of his movies, but seem like typical Hollywood big name blockbusters that people see on first day in theaters and then forget about it afterwards. I'm sure he can handle action and tension pretty well though.

[Dark Knight]

I'm seriously doubtful Nolan would be playing 'teacher', even with a Team Nolan developed script or Nolan making suggestions Snyder is still the one who's gonna be interpreting all of it, and given his track record he's always about the visuals first not the characters, he's almost like a better version of Michael Bay. If Synder did turn out to direct Superman I can foresee the exact opposite of what Returns delivered, a visual spectacle with no heart or character. That said, I don't think Synder will get the gig, I don't think people take him seriously to be honest.







I don't think Zacks ego is that big yet.

If you were an up and coming director and had a chance at working with another talented filmmaker like Nolan as your producer to make a potentially visually stunnng and epic Superman film.....would you let your ego get in the way of way?

Zack doesn't seem like that kind of egomaniac at all.

[annie.j88]

Coz maybe Nolan sees something that we don't. Don't forget, Chris only had 3 films under his belt before taking on Batman Begins, inexperience is not always a bad thing, in fact it's the opportunity to have fresh set of eyes look at everything. The guy showed in Moon he can do a hell of a lot with very little, imagine someone like that with 5 times the budget at their disposal.

quoted for truth. i get a good feeling from this jones guy.

[Man of Tomorrow]

Aside from Synder, I love this list.

All controllable up and coming directors that will transmit the Nolan/Goyer vision onto the screen.

Also, I doubt any of them would have a problem with Brandon Routh back as Superman if by slight chance the studio wanted it.

[annie.j88]

as much as i'd like that, it seems like they'd want a clean slate and recast

[Mac_Hine]

Same here jones or reeves for me.

[jmc]

I don't think Zacks ego is that big yet.

If you were an up and coming director and had a chance at working with another talented filmmaker like Nolan as your producer to make a potentially visually stunnng and epic Superman film.....would you let your ego get in the way of way?

Zack doesn't seem like that kind of egomaniac at all.

He's still very much got his own style of directing that he clearly likes, he likes the focus to be on the visuals, his films show that. Would he take advice from Nolan? Maybe, I don't know the guy, that said would Nolan even be giving out advice on what to do? I'm somewhat doubtful, I don't think Chris would be doing that to any director, going off his experience I'm sure he'd want the director to have the opportunity that he got in being able to do his own thing and create the film as he sees fit, otherwise Chris may as well be directing the bloody thing. And I'd hardly say Snyder is an up and coming director, the guy's carved out a niche audience for himself years ago, he's been around for sometime now, he's not a newcomer.

[SuperDaniel]

Exactly.

Zack Snyder "acts like a Superman hater"?? WTF?

Don't know about that one! :huh:

Yes. He acts like he hates the character, judging by his previous comments. He says he`s not interested and doesn`t know how a earnest character and good guy would fit in today`s world. He doesn`t seem to get Superman, IMO. And because of that, i want him to STAY AWAY from this!

[Dark Knight]

I hope Nolan "recommends" Reeves or Snyder.

The others just don't cut it IMO and Scott is past his prime!

I wouldn't be surprised if Jones gets the gig either.

I think with Nolans' producing and storytelling abilities mixed with Snyders' visuals and intense action sequences would make for a DYNAMIC filmmaking team that can execute the type of Superman film we have been waiting to see for many years!

[Seen]

Apparently Latino Review spoke to Snyder recently and he debunked any interest. Whether or not that is true, I'm not entirely sure. As for him directing Superman, I did really enjoy Snyder's Dawn of the Dead remake, but I was impartial to 300 and I thought Watchmen was uneven, although I did enjoy a lot of what was in that movie. I think he should stick to graphic novels and other dark, moody stuff- his style doesn't fit with Superman at all.

I'm pulling for Jones. He directed one of the best and most original pieces of sci-fi in recent years with Moon on a minuscule budget. Superman needs that type of creative ingenuity, and furthermore, Moon proved Jones has an excellent handle on character, and that is another thing Superman needs as well.