View Full Version : After credits scene, who would u show as a cameo?
Knight121198
10-23-2010, 02:36 PM
Hi all im curious with all the end credit scenes Marvel has been doing, will Man of Steel have one? More to the point what would be your idea of an end credits scene?(cameo)
Gianakin_
10-23-2010, 02:38 PM
Well, a more appropriate example than Marvel's cameos is the Batman films' cameos... which are none:woot:
In all seriousness, I enjoy a good after credit scene. Depends on the villain they use in no1 and what they've set up with the story.
dark_b
10-23-2010, 04:10 PM
what marvel is doing is idiotic and pathetic.
the IM2 after credit scene is a joke .
SuperFerret
10-23-2010, 04:18 PM
That's the spirit! :awesome:
raybia
10-23-2010, 04:33 PM
Hi all im curious with all the end credit scenes Marvel has been doing, will Man of Steel have one? More to the point what would be your idea of an end credits scene?(cameo)
Alf
LadyVader
10-23-2010, 04:46 PM
Deadpool being all confused and saying: "I thought this was the Green Lantern movie! I gotta talk to that Reynolds kid. And by talk I mean beat the snot out of him." :p
tnr105
10-23-2010, 04:48 PM
On the Starkville House of El podcast, the episode for the Smallville episode Bloodline, the host, who was a writer for the outproduced Superman Returns sequel said that at the end of his draft, they would show an asteroid belt that was the ruins of Krypton, and a ship would emerge with the blinking 3 dotted Brainiac logo, with the words "Brain Interactive Construct" written on the side in Kryptonese. Something like this would be cool.
My own idea would to be to carry over Tomar Re from Green Lantern, the lantern from Krypton's sector.
Sawyer
10-23-2010, 04:51 PM
No one because after credits scenes are lame. :o
bgshw44
10-23-2010, 05:15 PM
has to tease something for the next movie, but before the credits ala the bb joker card flip
TheFuture
10-23-2010, 05:23 PM
No-one. Personally I like Marvel's after credit additions, they're a nice nod to fans. But it's something Marvel has established, DC shouldn't bite on the idea.
Definitely not.
MARVEL reeks of factory franchise now. DC has got more class and they should stick with that.
El Payaso
10-23-2010, 07:08 PM
No one because after credits scenes are lame. :o
:up:
CKlov
10-23-2010, 07:10 PM
I would like to see otis released from jail. hes been inside too long.
Pac-Master
10-23-2010, 07:17 PM
what marvel is doing is idiotic and pathetic.
the IM2 after credit scene is a joke .
:facepalm:
Yeah, building up heroes in their own solo films to lead to a team-up movie that's the first of its kind is idiotic and pathetic. :o
El Payaso
10-23-2010, 07:36 PM
:facepalm:
Yeah, building up heroes in their own solo films to lead to a team-up movie that's the first of its kind is idiotic and pathetic. :o
It absolutely is.
Pac-Master
10-23-2010, 07:37 PM
It absolutely is.
Please explain why you think this.
El Payaso
10-23-2010, 07:48 PM
To put 20 heroes with a different story each together in a movie thinking it'll be 20 times more exciting is just stupid. Then you have to put like 20 villiains in. And we know what happens with 3 villiains together.
Pac-Master
10-23-2010, 08:10 PM
To put 20 heroes with a different story each together in a movie thinking it'll be 20 times more exciting is just stupid. Then you have to put like 20 villiains in. And we know what happens with 3 villiains together. But that's the thing. Marvel is releasing these solo movies first for a reason. What you're saying might have been true if we had an Avengers film with no solo films before it, but that is not the case. Marvel wants the general audience to understand and relate to these characters and see these movies that excite them so much before putting them all together. And the "different stories" aspect is something that makes it more interesting. One of the main aspects of the Avengers is how they get along and work as a team. They are all very different people, and seeing how they cooperate and work together is something that has a lot of potential. Not to mention that the director, Joss Whedon, is great with ensemble projects.
Like I said, it's the first of its kind, and is no way a pathetic idea.
El Payaso
10-23-2010, 08:14 PM
But that's the thing. Marvel is releasing these solo movies first for a reason. What you're saying might have been true if we had an Avengers film with no solo films before it, but that is not the case. Marvel wants the general audience to understand and relate to these characters and see these movies that excite them so much before putting them all together. And the "different stories" aspect is something that makes it more interesting. One of the main aspects of the Avengers is how they get along and work as a team. They are all very different people, and seeing how they cooperate and work together is something that has a lot of potential. Not to mention that the director, Joss Whedon, is great with ensemble projects.
Like I said, it's the first of its kind, and is no way a pathetic idea.
So you did miss the parts in bold?
To put 20 heroes with a different story each together in a movie thinking it'll be 20 times more exciting is just stupid. Then you have to put like 20 villiains in. And we know what happens with 3 villiains together.
But to be the first of your kind doesn't make you immediately genius or non-pathetic. To try and make a movie where there's little room for character dveelopment but a good excuse for a string of brainless CGI action scenes.
Pac-Master
10-23-2010, 08:30 PM
But to be the first of your kind doesn't make you immediately genius or non-pathetic. To try and make a movie where there's little room for character dveelopment but a good excuse for a string of brainless CGI action scenes.
It doesn't make it an idiotic idea either. And there IS room for character development. Like I said before, part of the main selling point is seeing how they work together as a team. Stark still needs to mature. Thor is a god. Banner is a fugitive. And Cap's job is to lead the group. How does a man from the past lead a diverse team of people with diverse characteristics? How can you NOT see the chances for character growth there?
Also, 20 people won't be on the team in the movie. Its the main four with Hawkeye, Black Widow, and Nick.
SuperFerret
10-23-2010, 08:31 PM
Uhh... you know what, nevermind.
DCnightwing23
10-23-2010, 11:20 PM
Well if there was a Cameo i wouldnt say Batman, and not because those universes are "separated" but because Batman 3 is Bale's last batman film. Maybe a Green Lantern cameo, well not GL but just a Hal Jordan cameo. I dont think there will be a cameo.
I Am The Knight
10-24-2010, 12:03 AM
what marvel is doing is idiotic and pathetic.
the IM2 after credit scene is a joke .
:huh: I love yer logic! I don't get it! :awesome:
I would like to see otis released from jail. hes been inside too long.
HAHAHAHAHA! :woot:
To put 20 heroes with a different story each together in a movie thinking it'll be 20 times more exciting is just stupid. Then you have to put like 20 villiains in. And we know what happens with 3 villiains together.
There are some weird lapses of logic in this thread. Care to explain why 20 heroes = 20 villains, my lad? IM2 had like half of The Avengers versus....One...Rourke. Who was a piss poor villain, but that's not the point. I guess Justin Hammer too, but that's about it. But I'm really not following. Is this a dig at the concept of The Avengers or the concept of having multiple comic book characters in a movie? If it's the former, you must hate all the classic ensemble movies, and if it's the latter, well, you must really hate BB and TDK.
BTW, there was plenty of time for character development for Stark and Co. in IM2, they just didn't use that time properly. Do you really think 2 seconds of Thor's hammer are a detriment to any movie?
I think the fact that people will know these characters separately and then will get to see them all together in one huge movie is perfectly fine. Are the cameos in the solo movies a bit whorish? I guess so, yes, but it's also nice to see that kind of stuff. I know Marvel is iffy in regards to quality sometimes, but the idea behind The Avengers and the cameos is a sound one to me.
AnorexicBatman
10-24-2010, 01:54 AM
Maybe Superman can save a jet fighter from crashing. The pilot thanks him and introduces himself as Hal Jordan (he already has the ring, would have used it had Supes not arrived).
Or it could be a within movie reference. Lex Luthor thanking a certain Mr. Fox for doing business with him. It could be Lucious Fox or Fantastic Mr. Fox. The viewer can decide
Or something more subtle. At the end of the movie, Jimmy can be heard talking about some woman claiming to be an Amazon Princess (a tabloid story)
Or Superman can be flying around minding his own business, lamenting being alone but suddenly a dog, cat, horse, monkey, a boy and a girl all wearing superman outfits crash into him.
A gavel pounds ominously. A courtroom in hell. Superman faces off against the heirs of his creators in the culmination of his never ending battle, trademark litigation!
Kurosawa
10-24-2010, 05:19 AM
If DC were going to do these easter egg teases, they should do them either during the movie or at the end like in Batman Begins with the Joker card.
One really cool bit they could do if they were actually crossing their movies over (but they supposedly are not) is to have Green Lantern Tomar-Re present when Krypton is destroyed as he was ordered to delay the planet's destruction by the Guardians but was delayed when a star went nova and he was incapacitated.
AnorexicBatman
10-24-2010, 05:24 AM
If DC were going to do these easter egg teases, they should do them either during the movie or at the end like in Batman Begins with the Joker card.
One really cool bit they could do if they were actually crossing their movies over (but they supposedly are not) is to have Green Lantern Tomar-Re present when Krypton is destroyed as he was ordered to delay the planet's destruction by the Guardians but was delayed when a star went nova and he was incapacitated.
I had the exact reverse idea for the Green Lantern movie where the destruction of Krypton would be counted by Sinestro as one of their greatest failures.
On the other hand. In the beginning of the movie when Jor-El is trying to convince the Council that the planet is about to be destroyed, he suggests that they could take the help of the Guardians of Oa but the Council calls them a bunch of fools.
Kurosawa
10-24-2010, 05:27 AM
I had the exact reverse idea for the Green Lantern movie where the destruction of Krypton would be counted by Sinestro as one of their greatest failures.
On the other hand. In the beginning of the movie when Jor-El is trying to convince the Council that the planet is about to be destroyed, he suggests that they could take the help of the Guardians of Oa but the Council calls them a bunch of fools.
Very cool. It shows both the importance of Krypton and of the GLC.
El Payaso
10-24-2010, 10:57 AM
It doesn't make it an idiotic idea either.
Yes. And since it doesn't make it either brilliant or stupid... why mention it's the first of his kind?
That said, I've seen movies with many superheroes put together: X-Men. But they all have a common story behind.
And there IS room for character development. Like I said before, part of the main selling point is seeing how they work together as a team. Stark still needs to mature. Thor is a god. Banner is a fugitive. And Cap's job is to lead the group. How does a man from the past lead a diverse team of people with diverse characteristics? How can you NOT see the chances for character growth there?
Every one of those characters you mention can do better with their issues one by one. Stark can mature in IM3. Thor is a god in his own franchise. Banner is a fugitive in a sequel. And I'm not suire what's Cap's need to lead a group as a development for him.
But I'm sure that being like 6 of them in a 2 hour movie will have far less room for development than 1 of them in a 2 hour movie.
Also, 20 people won't be on the team in the movie. Its the main four with Hawkeye, Black Widow, and Nick.
You're not too familiar with hyperbole.
Adenjo
10-24-2010, 11:13 AM
How about Stan Lee looking a little lost?
El Payaso
10-24-2010, 11:26 AM
How about Stan Lee looking a little lost?
:joker::up:
The graves of Shuster and Siegel.
Or they could make a cameo Stan Lee-style. God, I hate that gimmick. :cmad:
The Guard
10-24-2010, 02:03 PM
Beppo.
Blitzkrieg Bop
10-24-2010, 02:15 PM
Krypto
elgaz
10-26-2010, 04:20 AM
I would have thought the Flash would have been the best obvious cameo, given that the Flash movie is now going ahead.
After the credits roll, have a short scene with Superman responding to an alert somewhere. As he flies towards the disaster at near the speed of light, he looks down and is amazed to see a red blur on the ground moving much faster than he is.
GreenKToo
10-26-2010, 07:03 AM
I like the GLC and Oa idea.
SuperAl
10-27-2010, 05:41 PM
none, after credit scenes are a gimmick that marvel seems to use alot. DC should 1up them and put the cameos directly in the movie, have the character actually do something, none of this after credits BS.
Man of Steel
10-28-2010, 04:16 PM
The Guardians of Oa or Tomar-Re, maybe Hal Jordan in college. Put Superman himself at the end of "The Dark Knight Rising".
Lightning54SC
10-28-2010, 04:34 PM
how about we just do a Batman Begins ending and basically hint us to the following villain for the second film
Adenjo
10-29-2010, 12:08 AM
none, after credit scenes are a gimmick that marvel seems to use alot. DC should 1up them and put the cameos directly in the movie, have the character actually do something, none of this after credits BS.
How about a "hidden" uncredited cameo? (obviously pointed out in the DVD extras of course)
example:
Lex Luthor surrounded by press outside Luthorcorp, in the background a large black car pulls up, out pops Michael Cain from the drivers seat, scene ends just before he reaches the rear door to open it.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.