View Full Version : Sienna Miller's views on GI Joe..
ZIPBAGS
04-26-2011, 01:45 PM
I took my kids on vacation to London. I also collect autographs. So while there I figured I would try to get some after some of plays ended. I waited for Sienna to come out. She does and was nice enough to take a picture and sign a card. I took the time to tell her that my son loved the GI Joe movie. She laughed and said that movie was horrible. I said well he is 8. She then thanked him for being a fan.
http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/342/p1010773c.jpg
cronosred
04-26-2011, 02:01 PM
I'm not surprised, she never really did hide her dislike for the film, if I remember correctly even when promoting the film she basicly said she only did it just to be in a big film because that's how the Hollywood game works. I still think G. I. Joe turned out better then the Transformer films.
powerbomb1411
04-27-2011, 12:37 AM
I still think G. I. Joe turned out better then the Transformer films.
How in the world can you think that?
cronosred
04-27-2011, 03:24 AM
How in the world can you think that?
No Joe's urinating on people.
No Joe's wanting to kill people just because they find them annoying.
No brass balls hanging from Destro's genital region.
No creepy perverted teachers.
No old man's a** in a speedo.
The ability to not only follow the fights but also able to tell who is who.
No pot brownies.
No humping dogs.
No picking noses.
No twins.
No Joe having to speak via the radio.
No farting.
TheVileOne
04-27-2011, 03:23 PM
Good on you having a nice experience with Sienna Miller. Glad to hear she comes off like a nice gal and granted stars don't really need to be that way when they get a lot of attention and have their own private stuff going on.
powerbomb1411
04-28-2011, 12:44 AM
No Joe's urinating on people.
No Joe's wanting to kill people just because they find them annoying.
No brass balls hanging from Destro's genital region.
No creepy perverted teachers.
No old man's a** in a speedo.
The ability to not only follow the fights but also able to tell who is who.
No pot brownies.
No humping dogs.
No picking noses.
No twins.
No Joe having to speak via the radio.
No farting.
You must comparing them like Democrat and republican, because G.I. Joe (If you can even call it that) was one of the worse films in cinematic history.
Marvin
04-28-2011, 02:03 AM
I still think G. I. Joe turned out better then the Transformer films.
and yet for some unseen reason, joe's are scrambling for a sequel no one asked for and crappy TINO is hotly anticipated
cruel, illogical, world.
powerbomb1411
04-28-2011, 03:10 PM
What is TINO?
Angelus_Darko
04-29-2011, 02:29 PM
I watched GI Joe because of her, but I think that Joe is one of those movies that I'd have loved as a kid. Anyhow, can I have a Billy Madison moment? Sienna Miller... so hot... want to touch her heiney... auuuuuuuuuuu!!
Golgo-13
05-04-2011, 06:36 AM
What is TINO?
Transformers In name only.
Red Mask
05-07-2011, 06:12 AM
As long as the your kid enjoyed it, that's good.
Hypestyle
05-09-2011, 12:01 AM
sienna should come back.. hopefully..
Rowsdower!
05-13-2011, 03:38 PM
The first Transformers was an enjoyable movie and infinitely better than the cinematic turd that was GI Joe.
Transformers 2 was a piece of crap but I would still put it a couple notches above GI Joe because, though so many of you hate Shia LaBeouf, he's got 10 times the sceen presence that Channing Driftwood Tatum has. I swear, every time Tatum is cast in a movie, it's a sign that the end of the universe is closer than we think.
echostation
05-17-2011, 12:48 AM
who the hell is the ******* above... this Oppolaled spamming ass... go the hell away
Golgo-13
05-17-2011, 11:19 AM
They completely raped the Baroness character making her a good guy under mind control... :rolleyes:
RichardMoore
05-19-2011, 11:07 PM
I for one don't care about either's source material.
But GI Joe was the most fun I had in a movie theater in a while. Both Transformers films were nauseating.
jaganar
05-29-2011, 09:45 AM
my only question is HOW IN BLAZES could they cast a flatchested ingrate actress like SM for a boxum beauty like baroness?.
she is flat chested, not BOMBSHELL MATERIAL , had the nerve to complain that she had to wear fake breasts in several interviews (HAVE ANYONE GOOGLED HER NAKED, the girls are barely there >__>) .
WE COULD HAVE GARCELLE BEAUVAIS-NILON , JESSICA BEIL , CHARISMA CARPENTER [ all fine actresses who are BUILT BY GOD ABOVE for the role ] but no we ended up with this MUDDUCK PoS actress , u know what ill even go so far as saw Even MEGAN FOX is better cast in the JOE movie instead of SM . i dont think any fanboy would have argued with any of these choices ( we almost had a black robin, before JOEL destroyed the bat franchise)
honestly GOOD RIDANCE to bad rubbish.
her RESPONSE TO the director ( if im wrong im wrong) being pissed at a flat chested actress cast as BARONESS ( lets face it we ALL KNOW BARONESS is supposed to be PrON star material not UGH )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://imgs.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/dailydish/detail?entry_id=27564
But Miller admits she was left slightly stunned when Sommers told her that her small chest had to be given an extra boost so she would look more curvaceous on screen.
She says, "(I wear a) tight black leather outfit. And much bigger boobs.
"They gave me these things that looked like chicken fillets. The director said, 'I'm gonna be honest, I like girls with big boobs,' and I don't have them so we made them bigger.
if you are a flat actress DONT autdition for A ROLE fanboys DREAM of .
i actually purchsed her toy via toys r us on clearance for a dollar just to melt it .
The Morningstar
05-29-2011, 09:55 AM
You're complaining about her having a flat chest? Did you watch the movie? Miller's Baroness was probably the best thing in that steaming pile of a movie.
And you're last statement is just utterly laughable. People like you are the reason "fanboys" are ridiculed.
"If you are a flat actress don't audition for a role fanboys dream of!"
I mean seriously, WTF is that? Step out of the basement lad.
jaganar
05-29-2011, 12:31 PM
i dont know u , i dont care about ur opinion.
ur on drugs guy , pure and simple .. i walked into ROC knowing they destroyed it , and looked at it as a crackhead writing the script.
the POWER COUPLE was my only reason to even go see the movie , marlon and the doctor actually made up for the film . everything else including the drug-induced writers' origin of duke/flat chest/cobra commander pissed me off. THEN they had to kill Covergirl , seriosly if you didnt appreciate CG u need to have ur head examined.
BARONESS is A BOMBSHELL not a prudish ingrate ___ch.
miller , i will always hate her for giving a z-level attempt at acting for someone that inspired tons of fanboys and girls IN THE YEARS BEFORE THE INTERNET.
u know what. EVEN CHASE MASTERSON (Leeta - terok nor ) could have done the role . so get back to ur basement and watch that constipated actress and shiny stalker in a POOR MANS version of BUFFY and ANGEL (thats Twilight incase you cant figure it out.)
The Morningstar
06-02-2011, 06:27 AM
You can't be a real person? I really hope you're not, it'd make me shed a tear for man kind.
childeroland
06-03-2011, 07:50 AM
my only question is HOW IN BLAZES could they cast a flatchested ingrate actress like SM for a boxum beauty like baroness?.
she is flat chested, not BOMBSHELL MATERIAL , had the nerve to complain that she had to wear fake breasts in several interviews (HAVE ANYONE GOOGLED HER NAKED, the girls are barely there >__>) .
WE COULD HAVE GARCELLE BEAUVAIS-NILON , JESSICA BEIL , CHARISMA CARPENTER [ all fine actresses who are BUILT BY GOD ABOVE for the role ] but no we ended up with this MUDDUCK PoS actress , u know what ill even go so far as saw Even MEGAN FOX is better cast in the JOE movie instead of SM . i dont think any fanboy would have argued with any of these choices ( we almost had a black robin, before JOEL destroyed the bat franchise)
honestly GOOD RIDANCE to bad rubbish.
her RESPONSE TO the director ( if im wrong im wrong) being pissed at a flat chested actress cast as BARONESS ( lets face it we ALL KNOW BARONESS is supposed to be PrON star material not UGH )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://imgs.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/dailydish/detail?entry_id=27564
But Miller admits she was left slightly stunned when Sommers told her that her small chest had to be given an extra boost so she would look more curvaceous on screen.
She says, "(I wear a) tight black leather outfit. And much bigger boobs.
"They gave me these things that looked like chicken fillets. The director said, 'I'm gonna be honest, I like girls with big boobs,' and I don't have them so we made them bigger.
if you are a flat actress DONT autdition for A ROLE fanboys DREAM of .
i actually purchsed her toy via toys r us on clearance for a dollar just to melt it .
So they're only supposed to audition women you want to sleep with, as opposed to good actresses? Were they making a movie or just material for fanboys to wank off to?
jaganar
06-04-2011, 06:28 AM
@ Star
after miller did a twilight on her baroness, Chris and Marlon were my only reasons for watching the movie . and my only reason to buy the dvd.
(SNAKE AND STORM are pretty much an unwritten rule which is why i didnt bother mentioning it earlier.)
i stand by what i said. there are hundreds of actresses out there who would have given a great acting job as well as built for the role. the ones i listed were a few i could think of.
she hated the movie and it breaks my heart to see that she beat out so many other actresses for this bombshell role she tore to shreads after production . like the ZIPBAGs bore witness to.
if im not mistaken she also hated her movie figures :doh:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
you better forgive me on this one Star, i have alot of venting to get out because of this BASTARDIZED miscast.if not :awesome: HEY its the internet so ill live LMAO
childeroland :
the tech = tech nerds eyegasm
vehicles = eyecandy
every female actress but MILLER = beautiful and curvy .
and no but atleast pick an actress who is physically built for the role , instead of one who is not. i believe Kelly Overton would have given a better performance ( maybe the casting director had an axe to grind by thinking she was a great actress and giving her the role ). every person who watched Joe knew the baroness was well blessed and loyal to her man McCullen , her performance at best was cardboarded i really honestly felt nothing when her scenes came up. .
The Morningstar
06-04-2011, 08:13 AM
Sienna Miller is beautiful. And I actually admire her for being honest. The movie was a steaming pile of garbage, instead of lying through her teeth, she admitted it. It'd be good if more people in the industry were that honest.
Besides, you need to realize that these 100 million dollar budgeted films are not made to appease the fanboys. So get over it or your disappointments will continue.
jaganar
06-04-2011, 05:11 PM
i realized this when they bastardized every movie i grew up loving , including halloween. but that is HOLLYWOOD running on a very very VERY empty tank of ideas.
that is neither here or there , and im not thread jacking /fighting btw...to ask you a question in the movie WHY DOES EVERY FEM JOE have normal breasts and miller is the only one who is Odd man out ?
AGAIN I BLAME THE CASTING DIRECTOR and whoever the FRAG told her to audition for the role. funny atleast 3 people wanted to reprise their roles, you would think a movie with a BAD DIRECTOR would have inspired hate for being a total Tool , but SHE IS THE ONLY ONE who is *****ED and complained about the movie .
( levette*aka KLUNK (bionic 6 )cobra commander*,Rachel Nichols/scarlette) both loved being in the movie as well as their roles, you figure that one out.
:fhm:
so you keep your opinion sweetheart, MARLON and The Doctor (destro) are my reasons for purchasing this movie.and i can live with that, u think she is a great actress ,keep thinking so , not argueing i already said my piece.
Sienna Miller is beautiful. And I actually admire her for being honest. The movie was a steaming pile of garbage, instead of lying through her teeth, she admitted it. It'd be good if more people in the industry were that honest.
Besides, you need to realize that these 100 million dollar budgeted films are not made to appease the fanboys. So get over it or your disappointments will continue.
childeroland
06-04-2011, 05:54 PM
What are 'normal' breasts?
cryptic name
06-05-2011, 05:24 AM
The first Transformers was an enjoyable movie and infinitely better than the cinematic turd that was GI Joe.
Transformers 2 was a piece of crap but I would still put it a couple notches above GI Joe because, though so many of you hate Shia LaBeouf, he's got 10 times the sceen presence that Channing Driftwood Tatum has. I swear, every time Tatum is cast in a movie, it's a sign that the end of the universe is closer than we think.
All the other cast aside, Ray Park as Snake Eyes is better than anything in either Transformer films.
Brian Braddock
07-02-2011, 04:36 AM
ur on drugs guy , pure and simple ..
Gotta be honest, given your incoherent ramblings I think it's you that's on the drugs.
Brian Braddock
07-02-2011, 04:37 AM
All the other cast aside, Ray Park as Snake Eyes is better than anything in either Transformer films.
Agreed, although lets hope they fix that damn mouth!
Zanham
07-02-2011, 07:53 AM
i dont know u , i dont care about ur opinion.
ur on drugs guy , pure and simple .. i walked into ROC knowing they destroyed it , and looked at it as a crackhead writing the script.
the POWER COUPLE was my only reason to even go see the movie , marlon and the doctor actually made up for the film . everything else including the drug-induced writers' origin of duke/flat chest/cobra commander pissed me off. THEN they had to kill Covergirl , seriosly if you didnt appreciate CG u need to have ur head examined.
BARONESS is A BOMBSHELL not a prudish ingrate ___ch.
miller , i will always hate her for giving a z-level attempt at acting for someone that inspired tons of fanboys and girls IN THE YEARS BEFORE THE INTERNET.
u know what. EVEN CHASE MASTERSON (Leeta - terok nor ) could have done the role . so get back to ur basement and watch that constipated actress and shiny stalker in a POOR MANS version of BUFFY and ANGEL (thats Twilight incase you cant figure it out.)
Uhhh, you're saying someone elses writings look like a crackhead wrote it?::dry::dry::dry:
ur on drugs guy , pure and simple .. i walked into ROC knowing they destroyed it , and looked at it as a crackhead writing the script.
Your posts look like something the dog threw up. The only reason people bother trying to read it is the red type. Lucky for me, I realized how bad it was before I finished and was able to stop reading before I got to 'your point' and kept you from destroying my logical thought process.
I advise all others to steer clear of posts written by jaganar his posts are poison for the mind.
DACrowe
07-04-2011, 03:26 AM
This thread was hilarious. Miller being gracious enough to sign autographs and pose for pictures while joking about her (crap) films is being ridiculed by a fanboy who literally only sees women by their cup-sizes. Talk about a living, breathing cliché.
Here's the kicker, it was a bad movie and Miller is doing serious work on the West End and has moved on. We're two years out and some fanboys still are upset over misogynistic details. The juxtaposition is hilarious.
Brian Braddock
07-04-2011, 04:00 AM
^^^In a nutsell.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.