PDA

View Full Version : ☆ ROSIE being ripped by critics ☆


jaganar
06-30-2011, 04:06 PM
honestly her acting cant be that bad O_o
guys please tell me these critics are out of their minds
she is the actress equivelant of Shamalan ... i dont believe it:doh:

The Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2008520/Transformers-3-Dark-Moon-review.html?ito=feeds-newsxml) may have fired the first warning shot over the new actress. Baz Bamigboye gave the movie three out of five stars and pleaded: "Come back Megan Fox, all is forgiven." The critic does note the movie is "technically sublime" even if the human supermodel "can't act."

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

http://blog.movies.yahoo.com/blog/1675-critics-rip-megan-fox-replacement-in-transformers-movie

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

The summer blockbuster "Transformers: Dark of the Moon (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Transformers%3A+Dark+of+the+Moon&cs=bz&fr=buzz)" brings back the battle between good and evil robots -- this time with a pulsating score, bigger explosions, and 3D action that's coming right at you.

The action flick spends a good deal of time blowing up Chicago (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/movies/frame-from-transformers-dark-of-the-moon.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=transformers%20chicago&st=cse), and includes a scene of actual base jumpers (http://buzzlog.yahoo.com/buzzlog/94453/transformers-wingsuits-no-cgi-required) leaping off a high-rise. Many of the actors have returned from the last "Transformers" movie: Shia LaBeouf (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Shia+LaBeouf&cs=bz&fr=buzz), John Turturro (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=John+Turturro&cs=bz&fr=buzz), Josh Duhamel (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Josh+Duhamel&cs=bz&fr=buzz), and Tyrese Gibson (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Tyrese+Gibson&cs=bz&fr=buzz).
But following a feud (http://blog.movies.yahoo.com/blog/1603-steven-spielberg-involved-in-transformers-enough-to-reportedly-order-megan-foxs-firing) with director Michael Bay (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Michael+Bay&cs=bz&fr=buzz), the star Megan Fox (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Megan+Fox&ei=UTF-8&fr=yff40c), who played LaBeouf's girlfriend, was very publicly replaced with Victoria's Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Rosie+Huntington-Whiteley&cs=bz&fr=buzz). To put it mildly, the critics have not fallen in love (http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/movies/fox_transformers_replacement_slammed_OivAdWzaZScc3 a8GsQqINM).


The Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2008520/Transformers-3-Dark-Moon-review.html?ito=feeds-newsxml) may have fired the first warning shot over the new actress. Baz Bamigboye gave the movie three out of five stars and pleaded: "Come back Megan Fox, all is forgiven." The critic does note the movie is "technically sublime" even if the human supermodel "can't act."
Entertainment Weekly (http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20483133_20483482,00.html)'s Lisa Schwarzbaum grades the movie a respectable B, but that may be despite the presence of the actress. The review notes, "In the interchangeable role of sex doll, Victoria's Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley assumes the spot vacated by Megan Fox."



Wesley Morris of the Boston Globe (http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2011/06/29/toy_story_3_transformers_comes_to_the_screen_again/) assigns the sci-fi thriller just two out of four stars, and describes the English-born actress as "a replacement for Megan Fox, who is Judi Dench (http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=judi+dench&ei=UTF-8&fr=yff40c) by comparison."
Both women get ripped in Bill Gibron's take for Filmcritic (http://www.filmcritic.com/reviews/2011/transformers-dark-of-the-moon/). He rated the movie a four out of five stars and called the third in the series a "crowd pleaser." Still, the review calls out Huntington-Whiteley as "no better or worse than the curt Kewpie Doll she replaced."


Get the picture? Good looking does not mean good acting. Well, you can't have everything.

CelticPredator
06-30-2011, 04:44 PM
I hope they explode.

EliteF50
06-30-2011, 05:11 PM
This is stupid. I thought she was much, much better than Megan Fox.

Marvin
06-30-2011, 05:24 PM
This is stupid. I thought she was much, much better than Megan Fox.

she was
the criticisms are very telling.

DarthMuppet
06-30-2011, 05:41 PM
Though Rosie Huntington-Whiteley's performance did hit one or two rough spots early in the film, for the most part I thought she did an extremely good job(especially when you consider that this was her very first acting gig). She also has an extremely warm and likable onscreen presence and she's a much, much, much better actress than Megan "Plastic Surgery Disaster" Fox.

Marvin
06-30-2011, 05:45 PM
Was she better or worse than angel in Xmen First class,
both new actresses, but no one is talking about her.

Mace Dolex
06-30-2011, 05:51 PM
I thought she did ok but the stupid crititcs make it out to seem that she is integral to the movies plot.

DarthMuppet
06-30-2011, 05:53 PM
Was she better or worse than angel in Xmen First class,
both new actresses, but no one is talking about her.

Better.

Nightmare
06-30-2011, 06:02 PM
She didn't bother me as much as I thought she would. I would have prefered Fox though. Just for personal taste.

def28
06-30-2011, 06:05 PM
She did fine. The movie has greater problems then her.

triplefive
06-30-2011, 06:07 PM
for what it's worth, her direction from michael bay probably consisted of:

"pout. no. more. MORE. arch your back. now stick your ass out. OKAY. PERFECT."

i thought she was fine. wasn't watching that movie for stellar acting performances.

def28
06-30-2011, 06:08 PM
wasn't watching that movie for stellar acting performances.

Exactly.

Majik1387
06-30-2011, 06:12 PM
No offense to Rosie, but wasn't she hired to just be eye-candy? Unless she failed at being sexy, why is she getting hate? :huh:

Marvin
06-30-2011, 06:19 PM
No offense to Rosie, but wasn't she hired to just be eye-candy? Unless she failed at being sexy, why is she getting hate? :huh:

actually he was hired to be the love interest, kinda like mary jane was.
as for why the hat: why else.

Golgo-13
06-30-2011, 08:28 PM
She was no better or worse than Megan Fox, which is bad for Megan Fox because she had been acting for a while before being cast in TF1, and this is Rosie's first acting gig....

Majik1387
06-30-2011, 08:35 PM
actually he was hired to be the love interest, kinda like mary jane was.
as for why the hat: why else.
I'm sorry, but when I see Michael Bay movies, especially the Transformers ones, he doesn't hire actresses to be the "Mary Janes" of his films, they're more just sexual objects of the main guy character, just like 80s-90s action films.

She was no better or worse than Megan Fox, which is bad for Megan Fox because she had been acting for a while before being cast in TF1, and this is Rosie's first acting gig....
And Fox still sucks in her more "serious" roles.

Rowsdower!
06-30-2011, 09:34 PM
She had a few rough moments, but let's not kid ourselves here. She was cast as eye candy and she executed that duty perfectly. Her character had almost no personality because they didn't GIVE her a personality (which is typical of love interests in action movies, or in the case of Transformers films, nearly every other human character except Sam).

DW4
06-30-2011, 10:07 PM
Of course she was cast for eye candy but you're fooling yourself if you think she was any good at acting here, it was horrid.

You also continue to kid yourself if you thought she was better than Megan. Megan's no Oscar winner but she had more chemistry with Shia.

jaganar
06-30-2011, 10:30 PM
guys im seeing BAYFORMERS 3 tomorrow ,
so i figured you all would find this article interesting ...
the sad fact is that YAHOO is a crappy place to use as articles and when they hit on something that catches the eyes of the public (sports etc..) its usually an article they stole and added a few extra lines to .

so here goes :

Rosie looks sexy as sin , so ill give her a shot , sure she is in the sex symbol iindustry, but look how many people came out of that (claudia schiffer ,Denise Vasi , Estella Warren (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005535/) , nikki tyler ) sure some of them cant act worth a damn but they are sexy as hell.

personally megan is still sexy , but i take into consideration she is a publicity hound and did the "real" arguement about BAY to stir up interest (its been known to happen) and ill have my opinion on Rosie , unless she turns out to be as usefull as BIEBER in a date with a girl :o ,

angel , well i wish her the best, like i wished Calisto in X-MEN 3:the final garbage or poor whats her name , the actress who played katara in the ONLY AIRBENDER we are ever getting .


as far as yahoo : ill use this picture and i beleive it says it all
because it doesnt suprise me CRITICS for movies are the most [censored] of all humanity , (they wouldnt know talent if it bit them in the BUTT)

http://loltrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-hard-knock-life-of-an-internet-troll-597x659.jpg

OVERKILL ? maybe http://www.lowbird.com/data/images/2010/02/2690.jpg

Drizzle
06-30-2011, 11:01 PM
She wasn't that bad. She was better than January Jones in X-Men First Class.

Majik1387
06-30-2011, 11:16 PM
I highly doubt that

D4rkShaDoWz
06-30-2011, 11:27 PM
This is crazy! Even in the first scene I thought to myself "WOW. She's way better than Megan Fox." I also think she was more emotional in this movie than Fox TF1+TF2 combined. Also, people are forgetting that Megan Fox had acting experience in prior movies...this is her first movie ever.

For her first movie, she was great, IMO.

KRIM
06-30-2011, 11:44 PM
Yeah, massive overreaction here. She was completely fine. Only had maybe one or two moments in which she faltered. Everything else she delivered as well as you could ask.

Oh, and I gotta give it to Bay. I wasn't really feeling Rosie (looks-wise) as a substitute for Fox. By her third scene, I was ready to jump at the screen. She looked absolutely delicious.

nogster
06-30-2011, 11:45 PM
she was terrible. nice eye candy but there was 0 chemistry between her and Shia. she was employed to pout and strut. she did that well. but her she had nothing else to offer.
SPOILER.



The final scene where her and Shia do the "gone with the wind" meet up was embarrasing due to the fact that there was nothing of any substance and heart in their relationship. Now most of this is Bays fault, but if she had some charisma on screen and some sort of spark of chemistry with Shia the emotional impact that was intended might've had some merit.

She is being rightfully ripped by critics as this is a film. and they are professional reviewers of film.
Regardless of whether she isnt there to act, just to look good, she is acting and thus is judged accordingly.

Punisher Rising
06-30-2011, 11:51 PM
She wasn't bad and she wasn't particularly good, but I thought she did an above-average job, overall.

TheVileOne
07-01-2011, 01:17 AM
LOL I love all the hardcore fans feel like they have to be the white knight for Whitely because she walked around and showed off her butt in this movie.

DW4
07-01-2011, 01:42 AM
In all honesty do you guys really think this was good acting?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPU7vvf5flg

She actually got better as the movie went on but...yuck.


She's gorgeous though and when it comes down to movies like these I don't really care about acting.

dark_b
07-01-2011, 03:21 AM
she is a supermodel and she looked like a supermodel in the movie. her look and acting didnt fit with Shia IMO.

Nathan
07-01-2011, 05:34 AM
Honest question, I'm not trying to bash her or anything. Did she already have a few face OPs behind her? She looks like a doll.

jacobed
07-01-2011, 05:45 AM
She wasn't great but she was definitely better than Megan Fox. She felt more natural in her scenes where as Megan Fox felt like she was reading from a cue card off screen.

dark_b
07-01-2011, 06:25 AM
Honest question, I'm not trying to bash her or anything. Did she already have a few face OPs behind her? She looks like a doll.of course she had. she is a supermodel that makes millions every year.

to me she looks like a rich russian hooker on drugs

Golgo-13
07-01-2011, 06:28 AM
I felt she had a bit more chemistry with Shia too. I think when you compare her and Fox, looks wise, a guy like Shia is more likely to get a girl that looks like Rosie than a girl that looks like Fox...i'm just saying....

Nathan
07-01-2011, 06:34 AM
At least with Fox's character, you could kinda buy it, simply because of the **** they went through. If it wouldn't have been for the Transformers, they wouldn't have got close to each other at all.

With Rosie's character, she seems to be like the new hot chick of the week, that Sam somehow landed.

Golgo-13
07-01-2011, 06:48 AM
At least with Fox's character, you could kinda buy it, simply because of the **** they went through. If it wouldn't have been for the Transformers, they wouldn't have got close to each other at all.

With Rosie's character, she seems to be like the new hot chick of the week, that Sam somehow landed.

Well, when they met at the white house, she seemed pretty accessible in that she wasn't all dolled up. She just looked like a cute intern, at that point. Fox however, looked like the hottest girl in the area, from the get go...

dark_b
07-01-2011, 07:12 AM
Well, when they met at the white house, she seemed pretty accessible in that she wasn't all dolled up. She just looked like a cute intern, at that point. Fox however, looked like the hottest girl in the area, from the get go...ohhhhh please. lets be realistic. :awesome:she looked like a sex supermodel doll.

she was very dolled up in the white house. :woot:

Tony Stark
07-01-2011, 11:18 AM
She didn't suck any worse than Megan did.

PowersOfMind
07-01-2011, 06:33 PM
I'm sorry but I still say Megan was way better. People may grip on Megan's acting but I thought she had way more personality than Rosie. She came across as the random supermodel walking through the room. Plus her speech to Megatron was random because it was clearly written for Megan's character.

Timstuff
07-02-2011, 12:18 AM
Megan Fox always came across as a cold, pretentious little witch even when she was acting. There wasn't really much reason to believe Sam liked her other than because she was hot. RHW may not have been an upgrade in the acting department but at least she has a natural warmth and friendliness about her that made her a believable love interest. She might not be the greatest actress but she was at least likeable, which is more than I can say about Fox.

S.A.A.D.
07-02-2011, 12:30 AM
Even though I liked Carly, she was a very bland and uninteresting addition. I'm still not convinced by her overly simplistic small talk, the small talk that she had with Megatron.

PyroChamber
07-02-2011, 03:09 AM
Regardless of anything, Mikaela and Carly were both way out of Sam's league.

jaganar
07-02-2011, 08:49 AM
@S.a.a.D

lol, Storm had more lines in the first Xmen movie.

@Pyro
i guess Ocri was taking into account how many hot girls we knew in HS went out with Fugly guys. finally it becomes a real shard of truth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Saw it last night, the critics are the same ones who raved about AIRBENDER and TWILIGHT (how they couldnt connect BUFFY & ANGEL to this z-level ripoff i will never know). great movie glad to see ROADBLOCK and DUKE again (tyrese and josh)

so she can act , its just not written for her role to speak that much ...dont hate on pouting
ROFL.

and to be honest , if a critic is mad at her trying to act obviosly they never saw a porno , the scripted acting is waaaaay worse ;)

Dr Lee
07-02-2011, 09:05 AM
for someone in her first movie, to be better than someone who has a handful under her belt...

either shows up just how bad the other one is.... or, as i think, how well the newbie did.

Phoenix_Flare
07-02-2011, 10:57 AM
Honestly I thought her acting was good! TBH I got more heart from her charatcer than Meagan Fox's, the relationship felt more natural...real, it had depth, I think because of Sam's break-up w/Mikeala he really wanted to make this 1 work.

The reason why she's being scrutinzed because she's a high profile model and like singers' when they venture off to acting some get it pretty hard in the press or pass w/flying colors...Personally she was stunning in the film & her accent is cute!!! Good job Rosie!!!! A little more practice and she'll get better in time...

TheFuture
07-03-2011, 03:14 AM
I didn't think she was bad, she just didn't have a lot to work with. It was a very undemanding role to say the least.

nogster
07-03-2011, 03:30 AM
Honestly I thought her acting was good! TBH I got more heart from her charatcer than Meagan Fox's, the relationship felt more natural...real, it had depth, I think because of Sam's break-up w/Mikeala he really wanted to make this 1 work.

The reason why she's being scrutinzed because she's a high profile model and like singers' when they venture off to acting some get it pretty hard in the press or pass w/flying colors...Personally she was stunning in the film & her accent is cute!!! Good job Rosie!!!! A little more practice and she'll get better in time...

She is being scrutinized because her acting was poor. It has nothing to do whether she is a model or singer etc....
I dont see how anyone can actually think the relationship felt real or had depth. wow! each to their own I guess. but if this was the case then I wouldve felt something other than embarrassment when they did the "gone with the wind" cliche meet up in the end of the film.

This film had 0 character depth. It was transformers in name only.
Bayformers really is a fitting title.

Dugath
07-03-2011, 09:55 AM
What I do not get is how "Sam" somehow hooks up with 2 hot model type women. (3 if you include the Descepti-Chick in ROTF). I mean he is not that good looking, the character of Sam is kinda of a goof.

I Would have liked it if his "Gf" was an average "pretty" actress who could, well I dunno.. Act. oh well..

As I have not watched this yet I have no real opinion on her acting (I just do not like the fact they picked two hot women to play his love interests).

I look forward to any explanation as to why he is not with Megan Fox.

Timstuff
07-03-2011, 10:48 AM
She is being scrutinized because her acting was poor. It has nothing to do whether she is a model or singer etc....
I dont see how anyone can actually think the relationship felt real or had depth. wow! each to their own I guess. but if this was the case then I wouldve felt something other than embarrassment when they did the "gone with the wind" cliche meet up in the end of the film.

This film had 0 character depth. It was transformers in name only.
Bayformers really is a fitting title.

:whatever:

Sith Scotti
07-03-2011, 10:53 AM
The romance in part 3 sucked . Lets be honest she was eye candy , not that Fox wasn't but at least if we could belive the marriage talk if we had her character in it still . Somehow we are just told its a serious relationship though it sounded just as much like a rebound.


Megan Fox was better and the whole ending makes a lot morse sense if she or her character was in it . They should have at the very least recast the role .

Timstuff
07-03-2011, 11:02 AM
I think they made a smart choice by having Sam's new relationship be pre-established, because then they did not have to deal with the messy issue of introducing a new character and then making her and Sam get serious over the course of 2 hours. Yeah, the role was probably originally written as Mikela, but when your lead actress decides to PMS herself off the project you have to work with what you have, and I think they did as well as they could have.

PowersOfMind
07-03-2011, 11:13 AM
What I do not get is how "Sam" somehow hooks up with 2 hot model type women. (3 if you include the Descepti-Chick in ROTF). I mean he is not that good looking, the character of Sam is kinda of a goof.

I Would have liked it if his "Gf" was an average "pretty" actress who could, well I dunno.. Act. oh well..

As I have not watched this yet I have no real opinion on her acting (I just do not like the fact they picked two hot women to play his love interests).

I look forward to any explanation as to why he is not with Megan Fox.

Are you a guy? I'm just asking because if you are I can see why you wouldn't understand Sam getting two hot girlfriends.

It's not always about looks. This is something they touched on in the first film with Mikaela. She was known for always dating the hot guy who is basically an ass. Sam asked her if they all treat her the same why does she continually date them?

You're assuming that a hot girl would always date a hot guy. Some women would find Sam's goofyness endearing, which would be part of his appeal to them.

Nemi
07-03-2011, 11:44 AM
LOL I love all the hardcore fans feel like they have to be the white knight for Whitely because she walked around and showed off her butt in this movie.

Well when you put it that way.........can ya blame them? :hehe:

Sith Scotti
07-03-2011, 11:56 AM
I think they made a smart choice by having Sam's new relationship be pre-established, because then they did not have to deal with the messy issue of introducing a new character and then making her and Sam get serious over the course of 2 hours. Yeah, the role was probably originally written as Mikela, but when your lead actress decides to PMS herself off the project you have to work with what you have, and I think they did as well as they could have.

No the smart move is to recast the role ala the Batman films or to just not have a romance . The marriage talk at the end was out of place based on the trilogy . If it was Mikela it works . I just don't get why they didn't just recast the role because what we got does not work as a stand alone romance .

Timstuff
07-03-2011, 12:56 PM
No the smart move is to recast the role ala the Batman films or to just not have a romance . The marriage talk at the end was out of place based on the trilogy . If it was Mikela it works . I just don't get why they didn't just recast the role because what we got does not work as a stand alone romance .

I'd agree if it had not been established that Carly and Sam had been dating for quite a while before the movie begins. They established that Sam and Mikela have been over for a long time, and that Sam has moved on. You are looking at it as "Sam and Mikela have been together for two movies, and Sam has only been with Carly for one movie, so it's too soon" when that's not really the right way to look at it.

Sith Scotti
07-03-2011, 01:23 PM
I'd agree if it had not been established that Carly and Sam had been dating for quite a while before the movie begins. They established that Sam and Mikela have been over for a long time, and that Sam has moved on. You are looking at it as "Sam and Mikela have been together for two movies, and Sam has only been with Carly for one movie, so it's too soon" when that's not really the right way to look at it.

Non the less I was shown the Sam & Mikela relationship from the get go , so in my view it would have been a lot smarter to recast the character for me to have any vested interest in the possibility of marriage . There is a severe lack of devolopment with Sam/Carly .

psylockolussus
07-04-2011, 02:14 AM
Definitely way better than Megan Fox!

Ken-Kaniff
07-05-2011, 05:33 AM
She was alright in her acting, but she's a model (in a way it's kind of understandable, since most of them suck at acting and not only, but I say give 'em a chance anyway), so ofc the critics will destroy her lol! It's not fair, but that's how it is with critics.

I don't give a crap what critics think though/

Mace Dolex
07-05-2011, 11:50 PM
She wasn't that bad. She was better than January Jones in X-Men First Class.
Hell I'd say she was better than January Jones hosting SNL.

Grievous
07-06-2011, 12:19 AM
If I could pick between Rosie or Fox to be my wife I would pick Rosie. Who cares who can sale the better act. All these girls have going for them is their looks anyway. Their bodies are the only reason Bay put them in this movie anyway. Now days in the film world you either pick 2 types of leading ladies. choice A the actress with award winning acting skills or choice B the actress with the body that every guy will set as their wallpaper for the next month.

jaganar
07-06-2011, 03:27 AM
Non the less I was shown the Sam & Mikela relationship from the get go , so in my view it would have been a lot smarter to recast the character for me to have any vested interest in the possibility of marriage . There is a severe lack of devolopment with Sam/Carly .


when you consider the fact that when SPEEL-BUG had her spitcanned because of her supposed fight with bay (we all know it was them doing it to get publicity for the TF series, he cant take playful fighting SERIOSLY MAN ITS HOLYWOOD no one takes it seriosly :doh:) the script was finished .

the only re-writes i can see on my second time watching it on the bigscreen is that her ORIGIN SCENES were made after megan got fired , the rest of the role was obviosly left alone for mikala even the megatron scene , he was effing casual with her for FRAKs sake just look at his mannerisms in that scene alone like he knew her for a while now.

when u replace ROSIE with MEGAN the whole movie makes more sense , u just have to remove the ORIGIN line (when i stole her from the english embassy.....) and it makes perfect sense.

@Grievous
i totally agree with that statement, like the rarely spoken (rose byrne, amy smart, amy adams , denise vasi, alicia minshew ) i cant tell you how much i hate crappy actresses Kstew,Portman,ashley green.. etc get the spotlight....while actually talented ones like above get hardly any love,

@ POWEROFMIND...
i beg to differ on your arguement, remember in HS sometimes the hotchick had an ugly mofo for 2 weeks or so and then some one betterlooking ? its the same thing gross guys are easily forgettable and are grateful for the privilage of a cute /hot girl.

also, the added scenes of HIM flaunting the medal , is really overcompensating or like he did in BAY1 with his muscle scene :woot::woot::woot:( like mom said , youve been lucky so far ...unless you have a big. . . .)

Liam_H
07-06-2011, 03:33 AM
@Grievous
i totally agree with that statement, like the rarely spoken (rose byrne, amy smart, amy adams , denise vasi, alicia minshew ) i cant tell you how much i hate crappy actresses Kstew,Portman,ashley green.. etc get the spotlight....while actually talented ones like above get hardly any love,



Portman should not be lumped with that crowd.

Monsieur Xavier
07-06-2011, 04:12 AM
portman should not be lumped with that crowd.

qft

CaptainSpunk
07-08-2011, 03:33 AM
As much as I dont like Megan Foxes attitude. She worked soo much better with Shia. It just felt sooo tacked on to have Sam with another hot chick. Overall it would have been better for the trilogy to use Megan Fox. Even if you dont like her that much.

warhorse78
07-09-2011, 01:45 AM
I preferred Mikaela over Carly. They should have just had Rosie play Mikaela, won't be the first time a different actress played the same character.

Ken-Kaniff
07-19-2011, 02:19 AM
I preferred Mikaela over Carly. They should have just had Rosie play Mikaela, won't be the first time a different actress played the same character.
What? Unless that was sarcasm, how the f can that be any better looool?!?

They shouldn't have brought anyone at all to be Sam's gf. Or just bring a "normal" girl for once, who can act. An actress. There are a lot out there who are much prettier than Rosie.

Hordakfan
07-20-2011, 10:09 PM
Rosie should be my wife!