View Full Version : Ben Affleck Offered to Direct Justice League
FilmNerdJamie
08-08-2012, 02:13 PM
WB eyeing Ben Affleck to direct 'Justice League'
Thesp also mulling offer to topline Greg Berlanti's 'Replay'
By Jeff Sneider, Variety Staff
With Christopher Nolan declaring himself out of the running for "Justice League," Warner Bros. has approached another of its go-to directors in Ben Affleck, who's expected to discuss the project with studio brass in the coming days, multiple sources tell Variety.
Since guiding WB's "The Town" to commercial success and critical acclaim from both sides of the camera, Affleck has ascended high on the studio's list of filmmakers who can be trusted with prime properties. Thus far, Affleck is the only candidate who's been sent Will Beall's "Justice League" script, which the "Gangster Squad" scribe was hired to write last summer.
DC Comics' answer to Marvel's Avengers, "Justice League" is expected to bring together marquee characters Batman and Superman, as well as Green Lantern, Wonder Woman and The Flash. Affleck has made it clear that he's only interested in directing films in which he also stars -- "The Town" and "Argo" are proof of that -- so its likely that if this pairing ever came to fruition, he would don a suit of his own. DC Entertainment, Warner Bros. and Affleck's reps declined to comment.
While Affleck has shown an aptitude for mid-budget movies, he's poised to prove he can handle a nine-figure budget like other actors-turned-directors Jon Favreau ("Iron Man") and Kenneth Branagh ("Thor").
One possible hesitation on Affleck's part is that any involvement with "Justice League" would take him out of circulation as a director for a few years. He could, however, still fit in an acting gig at Warners.
Affleck has spent the last several weeks mulling an offer to star in topline Greg Berlanti's long-gestating sci-fi drama "Replay," which WB has spent more than a decade developing. Based on Ken Grimwood's 1987 bestseller, story follows a man who dies and gets the chance to relive his life over and over again, changing partners and professions each time.
As a director, Affleck is also keen to bring another epic adaptation to the bigscreen: Stephen King's "The Stand," a potential two-part pic that will be a co-production between CBS Films and Warners. Should Affleck sign on for "Justice League," it remains unclear whether WB would wait for him to move forward on "The Stand" or bring on another filmmaker.
Warner Bros. took control of DC Comics in 2009, folding the comicbook company into the studio and re-launching it as DC Entertainment to better manage how its characters wind up on the big and small screens. The CW will air "Arrow," based on the Green Arrow character this fall, but the studio hasn't greenlit any new films since "Man of Steel," which bows summer 2013. Other pics based on Wonder Woman and the Flash also are in development, but are only in script stages.
"Justice League" won't likely be ready for release until summer 2015, which could put it up right against Marvel's "Avengers 2," which has Joss Whedon returning to helm.
Since making his directorial debut in 2007 with "Gone Baby Gone," Affleck has been balancing acting and directing duties. After "The Town," he signed on to work with Terrence Malick on "To the Wonder" before returning to Warners for "Argo," which preems at Toronto next month. Multihyphenate recently wrapped New Regency's online gambling pic "Runner, Runner," and is also developing a movie about Boston crime boss Whitey Bulger with fellow "Good Will Hunting" Oscar winner Matt Damon.
Affleck is repped by WME and Ziffren, Brittenham.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118057612
MarvelKnight
08-08-2012, 02:19 PM
Interesting...
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 02:22 PM
I just saw this on /film. Interesting indeed.
He was apparently the favored pick for MOS but due to the time constraints Affleck backed out. I guess they'll offer him a good chunk of time with JL so he may consider it.
Well he's an awesome director so I'm honestly not against this. If anyone can make a standalone JL movie work I guess it would be Affleck.
I will say it's mighty suspect that this comes our right at the heels of Disney confirming Joss Whedon for The Avengers 2.
Chewy
08-08-2012, 02:22 PM
[insert Daredevil joke here]
marcvader
08-08-2012, 02:22 PM
Wow, didn't see this coming. I'd be interested to see what he had to say.
Blackman
08-08-2012, 02:22 PM
I like Affleck. But I think i'd be more interesting in his other projects than him specifically doing Justice Leauge
Eddie Dean
08-08-2012, 02:26 PM
Titus Welliver as Martian Manhunter! :awesome:
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 02:27 PM
Money on Affleck casting himself as Wayne/Batman. :p
He's a fantastic director, but an awful actor. He'd be an inspired choice to direct, but if he HAS to also star then I say pass...
Eddie Dean
08-08-2012, 02:34 PM
Maybe it he gets to cast Casey he'll stay behind the camera.
But in seriousness, he actually is a good actor, providing the right role.
Milkman95
08-08-2012, 02:35 PM
He's not an awful actor by any means, if push comes to shove, cast him as Barry Allen/The Flash.
FilmNerdJamie
08-08-2012, 02:35 PM
Affleck was one of many offered The Man of Steel. Once again, WB wants to stay inhouse for their big properties.
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 02:45 PM
You know I wasn't excited at all about this project because I don't think it's a good idea of having different actors play the same characters. It would confuse audiences and create a fuddled mess but I honestly believe that Affleck could make it work just based on how strong of a writer he is and the visual flair that his movies have. The guy is a solid package when it comes to both writing and directing.
Affleck has really elevated my excitement from non existent to curiously optimistic.
Donnie Darko
08-08-2012, 02:47 PM
I love Affleck. I really do. However, I think JLA might be too big for him right now. I'd like to see him do a more "street level" hero like Daredevil (coming full circle), Batman, Green Arrow, etc first.
Milkman95
08-08-2012, 02:49 PM
^That's what they said about Joss Whedon as well handling The Avengers, right?
marcvader
08-08-2012, 02:49 PM
I was going to say I preferred him going smaller and correcting the crapfest that was DD by directing it but If he's the one interested with a vision already in his head and not just a name WB is going after then go for it.
Kane52630
08-08-2012, 02:53 PM
He's got a fantastic record for directing and writing, The Town and Gone Baby Gone are up there with some of my favorite crime dramas so I'm down.
Also if he did have a part in the film, I want it to be only one person...
HU3C0Vv0FeA
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 02:56 PM
He's got a fantastic record for directing and writing, The Town and Gone Baby Gone are up there with some of my favorite crime dramas so I'm down.
Also if he did have a part in the film, I want it to be only one person...
HU3C0Vv0FeAThat there shows how great of an actor Affleck can be. I know some think he isn't but given the right material the guy is ace.
marcvader
08-08-2012, 02:57 PM
Dammit how did that clip end? :(
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 02:58 PM
Dammit how did that clip end? :(He got the kid to put the gun down. George Reeves never wore the costume in public appearances after that if I'm not mistaken.
FlawlessVictory
08-08-2012, 02:59 PM
I like the choice but don't see this as the type of project Affleck would accept. If he does I would be surprised.
So a 2015 release? So I am assuming this movie won't have any solo films building up to it? Would Cavill's Superman be the Superman in this? What is WB's strategy here? I doubt one even exists. Just throw whatever **** up at the wall and see what sticks.
Crockett
08-08-2012, 02:59 PM
So I wonder if he has changed his mindset now regard big-budget movies since he did backed out of the shortlist for MOS since he wasn't willing to tackle a big-scale project back then. Anyway Affleck has proven himself to be a good director, still am not a huge fan of his acting though but he's certainly a worthy contender to get the gig.
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 03:05 PM
:hmm Intersting...
batman44
08-08-2012, 03:06 PM
I like the idea of Affleck directing, his directing capabilities has been pretty darn good so far imo. He would certainly bring a level of "grittiness" that WB seems to be going for and I think he is capable of putting together a good cast.
Hopefully he accepts.
the amazing fro
08-08-2012, 03:17 PM
Hmm. While I like him as a director (and as an actor if given the right script), a film of this magnitude seems like a huge leap. He's certainly not a "safe" choice but he sure is an intriguing one.
BH/HHH
08-08-2012, 03:19 PM
Very interesting, if he's intent on having a part then maybe he could be Steve Trevor
chamber-music
08-08-2012, 03:19 PM
I'm down for Ben Affleck directing and writing but not playing a superhero again. A supporting character role like Jon Favreau had with Happy Hogan would be good.
hockeyboy89
08-08-2012, 03:19 PM
I'm a fan of his work, but like others have said.....what's WBs plan? The Avengers build up was part of the magic of the movie. Just pulling all these heroes out of no where just to see them on screen may not be the best approach.
BenReilly
08-08-2012, 03:20 PM
Ben's awesome and has an incredibly bright future ahead of him as a filmmaker.
WB's smart to offer (what one would assume would be their biggest and most ambitious superhero film to date) to him, and I have no doubt, Affleck could handle it.
Whether he accepts it or not remains to be seen...
FilmNerdJamie
08-08-2012, 03:22 PM
Affleck is coming off a lower-budgeted, character-driven thriller that turned into a nice profitable hit for WB (The Town). Bigger one than anyone anticipated. As a result, he was offered the keys to a kingdom in need of ruling (Superman). Just like Christopher Nolan coming off Insomnia.
Its a daring choice. I like what this represents, a la WB taking risks. Nolan wasn't the "obvious" guy to relaunch Batman at the time. But I hope he passes. Like the direction he's taking his career without the capes and tights.
Caboose
08-08-2012, 03:23 PM
Watch him go "U Mad, Cavill?" and cast himself as Superman.
marcvader
08-08-2012, 03:24 PM
Very interesting, if he's intent on having a part then maybe he could be Steve Trevor
Could see that.
Changeling
08-08-2012, 03:25 PM
Awesome ****ing news. I wouldnt at all mind him as Hal Jordan or Barry Allen.
RadioSha
08-08-2012, 03:25 PM
Oh, I like Ben Affleck as a director. Immediate favorites of mine (The Town and Gone Baby Gone)
I'm excited on how his new film, Argo, is gonna turn out. Since it incorporates a large talented cast, we'll see how he'll be able to handle it. If it turns out to be as good as those two movies, I'm all for him to do Justice league
Also, have Wally Pfister as cinematographer. That's a promising backcourt
OptimusPrime114
08-08-2012, 03:26 PM
Could see that.
Him or Maxwell Lord. Depending if he's in the movie.
chamber-music
08-08-2012, 03:27 PM
If Ben Affleck does direct the movie his buddy Kevin Smith will be all over his ass to get it right lol.
BH/HHH
08-08-2012, 03:29 PM
I'm a fan of his work, but like others have said.....what's WBs plan? The Avengers build up was part of the magic of the movie. Just pulling all these heroes out of no where just to see them on screen may not be the best approach.
Thing is the selling point is having Superman and Batman in the same movie thats enough to get the GA excited. Also if you've read the new 52 JL origin that shows that you don't need the origin movies first.
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 03:29 PM
If Ben Affleck does direct the movie his buddy Kevin Smith will be all over his ass to get it right lol.Lets hope they don't let Smith anywhere near the script for rewrites or anything like that. Basically keep Smith as far away as possible from this project.
Blackman
08-08-2012, 03:29 PM
Affleck is coming off a lower-budgeted, character-driven thriller that turned into a nice profitable hit for WB (The Town). Bigger one than anyone anticipated. As a result, he was offered the keys to a kingdom in need of ruling (Superman). Just like Christopher Nolan coming off Insomnia.
Its a daring choice. I like what this represents, a la WB taking risks. Nolan wasn't the "obvious" guy to relaunch Batman at the time. But I hope he passes. Like the direction he's taking his career without the capes and tights.
Same
BH/HHH
08-08-2012, 03:33 PM
You know I do have a feeling he'll probably turn this down
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 03:35 PM
You know I do have a feeling he'll probably turn this downIf he does I hope WB try their hardest to try bringing in Brad Bird if he's interested.
BH/HHH
08-08-2012, 03:39 PM
If he does I hope WB try their hardest to try bringing in Brad Bird if he's interested.
Totally I'm a massive fan if Incredibles
Llama_Shepherd
08-08-2012, 03:40 PM
Interesting. It's a fairly safe but also possibly inspired choice. I just hope they don't let him star.
TheFuture
08-08-2012, 03:41 PM
I'm torn. Yes, he has great potential as a director but I don't know about him getting JL. I mean Marvel getting Whedon for TA made sense from the POV that Whedon had an already established relationship with Marvel as well as having experience of working with ensembles.
Getting Affleck just doesn't make sense to me as there's no merit or good reasoning behind it. But I never judge anything or anyone unfairly, so would support the guy all the way.
Jesus, I just wish WB and DC would take their time to think about a good, long term strategy rather than being reactionary, which is what this feels like.
Kane52630
08-08-2012, 03:41 PM
What Brad Bird did with IM:4 is really right up Justice Leagues alley. Both can bring in great JL film.
Llama_Shepherd
08-08-2012, 03:43 PM
Brad Bird should definitely be at the top of their list. Just throw as much money as possible at the man.
BH/HHH
08-08-2012, 03:43 PM
That article states "Affleck has made it clear that he's only interested in directing films in which he also stars -- "The Town" and "Argo" are proof of that" but he wasn't in Gone Baby Gone
craigdbfan
08-08-2012, 03:45 PM
I'm torn. Yes, he has great potential as a director but I don't know about him getting JL. I mean Marvel getting Whedon for TA made sense from the POV that Whedon had an already established relationship with Marvel as well as having experience of working with ensembles.
Getting Affleck just doesn't make sense to me as there's no merit or good reasoning behind it. But I never judge anything or anyone unfairly, so would support the guy all the way.
Jesus, I just wish WB and DC would take their time to think about a good, long term strategy rather than being reactionary, which is what this feels like.I know exactly what you're saying. It doesn't help that this is released literally a day after Disney confirms Whedon to return for The Avengers 2.
I do like that they're going for talent but I also had hoped they tried establishing a world through solo films before just going in head first into a pool without water.
It wouldn't be "copying" Marvel for me either as it's just natural to try establishing at least Batman and Superman in the same world before tackling something like this.
It doesn't help that it seems they're adamant of having separate continuity and different actors for their solo films too. It just all seems really fuddled at the moment.
BH/HHH
08-08-2012, 03:47 PM
Knowing WB's even if is true they'll probably deny it like they did with Nolan godfathering Man of Steel they're pure idiots sometimes
Blackman
08-08-2012, 03:47 PM
I know exactly what you're saying. It doesn't help that this is released literally a day after Disney confirms Whedon to return for The Avengers 2.
I do like that they're going for talent but I also had hoped they tried establishing a world through solo films before just going in head first into a pool without water.
It wouldn't be "copying" Marvel for me either as it's just natural to try establishing at least Batman and Superman in the same world before tackling something like this.
Agreed.
Also, for me at least, I'm nervous because they dont have the best track record with solo films. To go and make a group film after not really having their stuff together with solo films leaves me skeptical.
sethypants
08-08-2012, 03:57 PM
Pretty sure Henry Cavill is going to reprise Superman.
Ben Affleck should be Steve Trevor. He looks like that role anyways.
TheFuture
08-08-2012, 04:00 PM
I know exactly what you're saying. It doesn't help that this is released literally a day after Disney confirms Whedon to return for The Avengers 2.
I do like that they're going for talent but I also had hoped they tried establishing a world through solo films before just going in head first into a pool without water.
It wouldn't be "copying" Marvel for me either as it's just natural to try establishing at least Batman and Superman in the same world before tackling something like this.
It doesn't help that it seems they're adamant of having separate continuity and different actors for their solo films too. It just all seems really fuddled at the moment.
This is what I mean by not thinking about a long term strategy. To be honest I think they're scared witless of doing the solo movie route first as Green Lantern was a big disappointment and Wonder Woman seems to be struggling to get anywhere.
I think what they're trying to do is just give us the team up first and see what sticks, I mean to see what characters the audience respond well to and go from there. That in itself is not a bad strategy, but it is how they execute the strategy which is my concern.
It is also asking a hell of a lot of Affleck to do this from scratch.
flash13
08-08-2012, 04:08 PM
This could be a good choice, I've never seen his movies but from what I've heard he's great with ensembles. I'll have to check out the Town and Gone Baby Gone now.
The Guard
08-08-2012, 04:18 PM
Great that they even considered him if true. He's done some fantastic ensemble work.
I can see him playing a number of characters, but I can see him making a great Flash. Even though he's already played the red colored hero in a head to toe jumpsuit in Daredevil. :)
Maybe he can rope in Jon Hamm.
Exciting rumor.
The Sage
08-08-2012, 04:32 PM
I like Affleck as a director. He's a solid choice. A surprising one for Justice League. He could do a good job.
Though I question what is the endgame with this film. No plan is known. Is it a launching pad for other solo films? They could use it to launch the Batman reboot.
I'd rather see a solo film with another DC character before this film is that's the route they're taking.
It does seem reactionary to the Avengers 2 announcement. Hopefully it's not and there's plan.
Rowsdower!
08-08-2012, 04:37 PM
Definitely intrigued by this news. Affleck was my top choice to direct a Batman movie if WB planned to continue the Nolanverse. I never expected him to be offered JL, but he certainly handle an ensemble film, so I would be very happy if he gets it.
Also, if he plays a role in the film, I'm not sure that I can see him as any of the heroes, but I think he'd make an AWESOME Max Lord.
darn I was hoping Kevin Smith would get the job
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 04:52 PM
This. Is. So. Amazing.
The Guard
08-08-2012, 04:54 PM
Also, if he plays a role in the film, I'm not sure that I can see him as any of the heroes, but I think he'd make an AWESOME Max Lord.
True.
sethypants
08-08-2012, 04:55 PM
I know exactly what you're saying. It doesn't help that this is released literally a day after Disney confirms Whedon to return for The Avengers 2.
I do like that they're going for talent but I also had hoped they tried establishing a world through solo films before just going in head first into a pool without water.
It wouldn't be "copying" Marvel for me either as it's just natural to try establishing at least Batman and Superman in the same world before tackling something like this.
It doesn't help that it seems they're adamant of having separate continuity and different actors for their solo films too. It just all seems really fuddled at the moment.
Didn't Jeff Robinov a month ago said he will be releasing news on his plans for DC in a month or so? This seems like its about a month from the date that he made the statement.
Not sure if having any lead in films is really neccessary. Every other movies in the world did not have an lead in or prequels. Avengers is the only one that did that. Does make all the other movies look rushed or whatever.
By having lead in, Avengers were able to raise the profile of Captain America and Thor. But do we really need to do that for Justice League. I'm sure everyone in the world knows who Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman is. GL had a film and Flash has always been a very iconic character, especially after the 90s TV.
X-men turned out fine without any lead ins. I didn't felt Xmen was rushed in any way either. So I really think its not neccesary to have lead in. Besides, majority of the people that watched Avengers, didn't even watched Hulk, Captain America and Thor. A number of them watched Iron Man. and it seems like they still enjoyed the movie perfectly.
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 04:56 PM
Didn't Jeff Robinov a month ago said he will be releasing news on his plans for DC in a month or so?
No. They said they would figure it out over the next month. They'd announce it later.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 04:57 PM
I'm honestly not sure how I feel about this. On the positives, he's a good director and has had past experience with big scale movies albeit on the other side of the camera, which I would hope a JL movie has. On the negative, I don't think he's that great of a writer; it dragged a lot in The Town, and I didn't think Good Will Hunting was that great in concept or delivery. Gone Baby Gone was his best I feel, and I thought it was great. And on the off-chance that he may cast himself in the movie, there's no character he'd be good for I feel. He's not a great actor, but he's not a horrible one.
Rowsdower!
08-08-2012, 04:58 PM
darn I was hoping Kevin Smith would get the job
Brian O'Halloran: Superman
Jeff Anderson: Batman
Joey Lauren Adams: Wonder Woman
Jason Mewes: The Flash
Tracy Morgan: Green Lantern
Kevin Smith: Martian Manhunter
Jason Lee: Darkseid
I'm sold. He could definitely add a more realistic gritty (but not too gritty) tone if he does JL.
Kane52630
08-08-2012, 05:03 PM
http://i.imgur.com/IEhAU.jpg
Suzanne78
08-08-2012, 05:06 PM
Brian O'Halloran: Superman
Jeff Anderson: Batman
Joey Lauren Adams: Wonder Woman
Jason Mewes: The Flash
Tracy Morgan: Green Lantern
Kevin Smith: Martian Manhunter
Jason Lee: Darkseid
Well, I'd love to see a JL movie with that cast! Snootchie Bootchies!! :oldrazz:
I'm very torn. On one hand, I've loved the movies that Affleck wrote and directed, especially Good Will Hunting. The Town was amazing. However, I do have concerns with how DCE handled their franchises, save for Nolan's Batman trilogy. Unless the JL story is solid, this could turn into a hot mess. And, as others have noted, this does come across as reactionary and short-sighted following The Avengers success and Marvel's announcements yesterday.
But keeping my fingers crossed for it.
TheWatcher
08-08-2012, 05:23 PM
I could see him as Barry or Oliver.
I'm not familiar with his directing but I heard The Town was good.
EDIT: when I wrote Aquaman I was thinking of Matt Damon.
smashmode
08-08-2012, 05:26 PM
Affleck has completely reinvented himself behind the camera, his next project looks equally good.
Kane52630
08-08-2012, 05:28 PM
Affleck has completely reinvented himself behind the camera, his next project looks equally good.
Yeah Argo looks really amazing.
JW3WfSFgrVY
flickchick85
08-08-2012, 05:30 PM
I'd be cool with him directing, but I'd rather he didn't give himself a role in it, unless it's a minor one.
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 05:32 PM
FYI, the timing of our JUSTICE LEAGUE story had NOTHING to do w/ Disney's announcement of Whedon & Avengers 2. We've been on Ben for weeks!
https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/233329192656310272
EML420
08-08-2012, 05:33 PM
I like Affleck has a director a lot I love The Town so im hoping he gets the job if he had to play any one in the movie I want him to be Batman.
I hope this doesnt conflict with The Stand I really want to see what he does with that.
sethypants
08-08-2012, 05:39 PM
No. They said they would figure it out over the next month. They'd announce it later.
"My hope is that over the next month or so," he said, "we’ll be ready to lay out the plan for the next DC movies."
They said they'll lay out the plans over the next month or so. Nothing about announcing it later. It seems like they're laying out the plans while releasing news. Ergo - Ben Affleck director.
TheWatcher
08-08-2012, 05:43 PM
If he was to be in the movie I bet he would be Barry.
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 05:47 PM
They said they'll lay out the plans over the next month or so. Nothing about announcing it later. It seems like they're laying out the plans while releasing news. Ergo - Ben Affleck director.
... That's what I said?
IamtheBatman
08-08-2012, 05:51 PM
After, The Town I am cool w/Affleck directing and if that's all he does!
ThePowerCosmic
08-08-2012, 05:51 PM
The fact that WB is actively prepping for a JL movie has me excited. 2015 could go down as the best year for CBMs with JL and Avengers 2 both possibly being released. Comic-Con '14 should be epic as well, could be the first time I actually go.:up:
SuperAl
08-08-2012, 05:59 PM
Has he directed anything since The Town? I know hes been attached to a ton of stuff. Seems like a good director, but not sure how he would handle big action scenes tho.
sethypants
08-08-2012, 06:08 PM
I was hoping they could leave Justice League for December. I know its not summer block buster, but I mean there'll be lesser competition and more time for preparation right?
RoughNTumble
08-08-2012, 06:12 PM
I like this choice because I don't think affleck will accept unless the script is excellent.
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 06:14 PM
Has he directed anything since The Town? I know hes been attached to a ton of stuff. Seems like a good director, but not sure how he would handle big action scenes tho.
Argo will be out soon.
sethypants
08-08-2012, 06:14 PM
Has he directed anything since The Town? I know hes been attached to a ton of stuff. Seems like a good director, but not sure how he would handle big action scenes tho.
Directed Gone Baby Gone in 2007 with lotsa award.
2010 - The Town
2012 - Argo
Writing credits also include Good Will Hunting in 1997 and won these:
All the following shared with Matt Damon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Damon):
Academy Award for Writing Original Screenplay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Writing_Original_Screenplay)
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Writer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_Film_Critics_Association_Award_for_Best_ Writer)
Florida Film Critics Circle Award for Newcomer of the Year (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Film_Critics_Circle)
Golden Globe Award for Best Screenplay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Globe_Award_for_Best_Screenplay)
Humanitas Prize (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanitas_Prize) (Feature Film Category)
National Board of Review Special Achievement in Filmmaking (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Board_of_Review_of_Motion_Pictures)
Satellite Award for Best Original Screenplay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_Award_for_Best_Original_Screenplay)
Nominated—Chlotrudis Award for Best Original Screenplay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlotrudis_Award_for_Best_Original_Screenplay)
Nominated—London Film Critics' Circle Award for Screenwriter of the Year (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Film_Critics%27_Circle)
Nominated—MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTV_Movie_Award_for_Best_On-Screen_Duo)
Nominated—Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Original Screenplay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Film_Critics_Society_Award_for_Best_Origina l_Screenplay)
Nominated—Writers Guild of America Award for Best Original Screenplay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writers_Guild_of_America_Award_for_Best_Original_S creenplay)
RoughNTumble
08-08-2012, 06:16 PM
I didn't realize he wrote good will hunting or his first two movies, that's pretty impressive.
he's a better writer/director than an actor, though he acts well in certain parts
hopefuldreamer
08-08-2012, 06:44 PM
I like this choice because I don't think affleck will accept unless the script is excellent.
Could he make some changes to it though, if he wanted to?
Llama_Shepherd
08-08-2012, 06:46 PM
Well he'd be the director, he'd have the ultimate creative say.
sethypants
08-08-2012, 07:04 PM
Could he make some changes to it though, if he wanted to?
Possibly. Depending on who the producer is, because the producer preserves the voice of the film. So if he is the producer as well, then he could make all the changes.
jacobed
08-08-2012, 07:28 PM
This has me pretty jacked. I absolutely love Affleck as a director and writer. I know he only has 2, soon to be 3 movies but I think he's one of the best directors out there right now.
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 07:32 PM
The more I think about it, the more I think he's a solid choice. If he does take it I hope he and Casey do not star in this film. I would like it better if he just stayed behind the scenes.
It appears, to me, that WB may be planning on going the spin-off route with solo films. And I agree that it looks like they may reboot Batman through this film, and continue as one the spin-offs.
socool
08-08-2012, 07:34 PM
Directing wise, I'm fully on board for this. The Town was awesome and Argo looks phenomenal. But to co-star? Ehhhhh.... I'm not so much a fan of that. He doesn't really strike me as any of the members of the Justice League and his acting talents are less than stellar. He isn't bad, but there are a ton of people who would be better as ANY of the members of the JLA. Well, hopefully, if he HAS to be one of the them...he's Aquaman. No one likes Aquaman...
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 07:37 PM
No one likes Aquaman...
Horse****.
JackMercy
08-08-2012, 07:46 PM
Variety's assertion about Affleck being "only interested in directing films in which he also stars" is an assumption (and a rather bold one), not a rule by the man himself...
And as others have pointed out, he didn't star in Gone Baby Gone -- which theoretically, took more cojones, since it was his directing debut-- though he did cast his brother!
:word:
ThePowerCosmic
08-08-2012, 07:46 PM
Horse**** indeed.
socool
08-08-2012, 07:52 PM
Horse****.
I agree. Aquaman is horse****.
:o
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 07:53 PM
:cmad:
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 08:03 PM
It's not that I don't like Aquaman, I just don't really care about him or his mythos. It's not that he's bad, it's just that I don't care.
Like Arrested Development and America. :o
socool
08-08-2012, 08:07 PM
It's not that I don't like Aquaman, I just don't really care about him or his mythos. It's not that he's bad, it's just that I don't care.
Like Arrested Development and America. :o
...:dry:
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 08:10 PM
It's not my fault America didn't care for AD.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 08:10 PM
Oh, I like Ben Affleck as a director. Immediate favorites of mine (The Town and Gone Baby Gone)
[...]
Also, have Wally Pfister as cinematographer. That's a promising backcourt
That would be nice, but I think if Affleck ends up directing JL, he'll probably go for a fresh cinematographer to work with. Probably one of several he's worked with, like Rodrigo Prieto or Robert Elswit.
And I think WB will have say on who is starring in the lead roles. I think getting Henry Cavill back as Superman is a given, but I don't think they'll let Affleck have a starring role as Hal Jordan or Bruce Wayne. They'll probably let him play a minor role, if nothing else.
As for Affleck possibly directing JL, he seems like an unusual but fine pick. If he has enough prep time, get acclimated with lots of green-screen work and CGI setpieces... he should be good to go.
RoughNTumble
08-08-2012, 08:16 PM
he's a little old to play a justice leaguer in a new franchise
socool
08-08-2012, 08:17 PM
It's not my fault America didn't care for AD.
Oh, haha, that's what you meant? I thought America and Arrested Development were two things you didn't care for.
:funny:
Wow, I misread that.
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 08:19 PM
Yeah I should have been clearer, sorry about that. :D
shauner111
08-08-2012, 08:22 PM
Wally Pfister retired, he's directing now.
I'm also not a fan of Aquaman. He's OK and if they pump out a lot of cash and try to make him a lot cooler...then i can see a decent movie/interpretation coming out of it. But im generally not a fan.
I think it's rare to find people out there who love the character to be honest. The typical reaction to his name is usually that they think his gimmick is goofy and so is his suit. That can be changed, but it's probably what the studio thinks too.
Spuzz
08-08-2012, 08:24 PM
If Ben directs it and does it well, he will skyrocket to the top of the best "Actors Turned Directors" list. The guy's extremely talented. His off-screen romances and antics have made him a tabloid joke and the majority of his projects have been s***. But his work in Chasing Amy, Good Will Hunting, and a lot of other films shows he really can deliver when he wants. Speaking of Chasing Amy, I know he's not as great of buds with Kev Smith these days due to Smith suspecting him of "stealing" some of hsi Red State cast for Argo without asking (not sure how such Hollywood etiquette works but whatever :P) but if Ben could take some tips from Smith (a guy who REALLY, REALLY gets the heart and soul of DC characters) the movie could really be golden. Not saying Smith should write it but maybe doing some touch ups on the script or whatever would be a good idea. Anyhoo, Affleck would not be my first choice to direct JL but given his track record of directing he's A-Okay with me. :)
Willi Berg
08-08-2012, 08:27 PM
I like Aquaman but I agree he is the butt of jokes and it would take a lot for him to be considered cool- action sequences, effects, great epic story etc. That would cost a lot and to show the potential of Aquaman in a JL movie is less risky for WB, as is the case with Wonder Woman etc.
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 08:30 PM
The fact that WB is actively prepping for a JL movie has me excited. 2015 could go down as the best year for CBMs with JL and Avengers 2 both possibly being released. Comic-Con '14 should be epic as well, could be the first time I actually go.:up:
Dear lord, I can already imagine the countless 'DC vs Marvel' debates if these two films are released, the same year.
Parker Wayne
08-08-2012, 08:36 PM
I agree. Aquaman is horse****.
:o
http://i.imgur.com/pRQn5.jpg
venus_ice
08-08-2012, 08:38 PM
Looks like Variety and Deadline are feuding on this http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/ben-affleck-on-justice-league-his-camp-says-no/
SuperAl
08-08-2012, 08:50 PM
They pursued him on MOS and he said no, not sure why he would want to do justice league over a superman movie.
The Guard
08-08-2012, 08:55 PM
Because it's The Justice League?
LibidoLoca
08-08-2012, 08:57 PM
Looks like Variety and Deadline are feuding on this http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/ben-affleck-on-justice-league-his-camp-says-no/ (http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/ben-affleck-on-justice-league-his-camp-says-no/)
CcntPNahVag
:o
Changeling
08-08-2012, 08:58 PM
http://blogwillhunting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/jon-hamm.png
This definitely increases the chances of my dream Bruce being cast, Jon Hamm. Hamm starred in The Town.
venus_ice
08-08-2012, 09:00 PM
Definitely an advocate for Hamm as Batman :awesome:
Changeling
08-08-2012, 09:03 PM
If 39 year old Ben Affleck is going to be in the Justice League, then 41 year old Jon Hamm can be Batman. Jon Hamm is easily the best choice for Batman, his age is the only thing that some would think holds him back, but if hes not the only older member it doesnt matter. RDJ is 47
RachelDawes
08-08-2012, 09:10 PM
It would be strange to have Cavill as Superman and Hamm as Batman, since they're so far apart in age.
Considering that Affleck felt he wouldn't be right for a Superman movie, I'm surprised he'd be willing to direct an even bigger film.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 09:16 PM
Are we sure he didn't feel right doing MoS, or is it that it just didn't work with his schedule?
shauner111
08-08-2012, 09:17 PM
Im starting to think he's not gonna take the job if he turned down MOS. But it would be great if he did.
As for Affleck choosing Hamm to be Batman. If this happens, it would only work if JLA was its own thing. And perhaps the future solo films belonged to say..Joseph Gordon Levitt's character. Hamm is too old to do a few solo Batmans on top of JLA. They'll need someone young if JLA/Bat-Reboot is connected.
Are we sure he didn't feel right doing MoS, or is it that it just didn't work with his schedule?
Hopefully that's what happened.
socool
08-08-2012, 09:18 PM
It would be strange to have Cavill as Superman and Hamm as Batman, since they're so far apart in age.
Considering that Affleck felt he wouldn't be right for a Superman movie, I'm surprised he'd be willing to direct an even bigger film.
I think it could work. I mean, if they make Hamm look like he's in his mid-30's, and Clark is supposed to be in his 20s in MOS, it would work fine. The idea of Batman being older than Superman makes a lot of sense in my mind. Batman is angry, bitter, and brutal because of his years on the job. Superman is still a young hero, he hasn't seen what Batman has; that's what makes Supes the "boy scout."
Changeling
08-08-2012, 09:18 PM
It would be strange to have Cavill as Superman and Hamm as Batman, since they're so far apart in age.
Considering that Affleck felt he wouldn't be right for a Superman movie, I'm surprised he'd be willing to direct an even bigger film.
Chris Hemsworth is 28 and RDJ is 47, 19 years older..I don't think it would be that weird to have a 29 year old Superman and a 41 year old Batman, thats only 12 years
mclay18
08-08-2012, 09:39 PM
Why do people still have a hard-on for Jon Hamm as a DC hero? Why? I just... I can't...
We don't know if Affleck will take the gig... he's just been offered it. I'd like to know who else is on the shortlist for directing if Affleck turns it down...
TheScarecrow
08-08-2012, 09:41 PM
Are we sure he didn't feel right doing MoS, or is it that it just didn't work with his schedule?
I had thought he passed on it for the same reason Aronofsky was refused his chance to direct it: WB needed it then and now, and neither of them had the capacity to come in and direct a huge movie in that short period of time and assure WB delivery on schedule.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 09:45 PM
im all for ben getting a chance to direct this. also in case this wasn't mentioned yet, this might be the first time we get to see a a new batman onscreen.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 09:46 PM
Definitely an advocate for Hamm as Batman :awesome:
i always wanted hamm for an older superman.
Saitou Hajime
08-08-2012, 09:48 PM
This seems like the Martin Campbell situation again. WB is getting a great director for a project, while not thinking if he's the RIGHT director for the project.
childeroland
08-08-2012, 09:49 PM
Deadline says Affleck isn't going to take the project. He might take a meeting, that's it.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 09:51 PM
And Variety, E!, MTV News, and Chicago Tribune say otherwise.
Changeling
08-08-2012, 09:53 PM
I trust that ^ this is such good news. The film is definitely going in a very mature direction by the looks of things
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 09:57 PM
And Variety, E!, MTV News, and Chicago Tribune say otherwise.
Is deadline wrong that often though, I know the rest of the online news community dislikes them, but they do break stuff. Although, its great when they get into these meaningless fights because then we actually get news on the activity of the projects.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 09:59 PM
Like I said in the Batman reboot thread, both sites are credible, they just happen to have differing views on this subject. All we can do is wait for more updates.
RoughNTumble
08-08-2012, 10:01 PM
well they both agree that affleck is talking to WB
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 10:01 PM
And Deadline and Variety are in a tiff right now.
Changeling
08-08-2012, 10:01 PM
(If) Ben Affleck signs on, how long do you think itll be before we start hearing casting news?
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:04 PM
Honestly, I wouldn't expect anything till November, but that's just me.
smashmode
08-08-2012, 10:05 PM
I'll wait until tmz makes their call
Primal Slayer
08-08-2012, 10:05 PM
Maybe since I am used to seeing him as an actor, I am kind of weary of him potentially directing a JLA movie. Also since I am not used to seeing/hearing/whatever him about anything as big as JLA or dealing with something similar. But certainly an interesting choice.
HighFivingMF
08-08-2012, 10:05 PM
Maybe confirmation of Cavill and/or Reynolds beforehand I'd think.
Raiden
08-08-2012, 10:06 PM
Ben Affleck is competent actor and a good director, so I'm not sure why some people hold such disdain for him. Plus, he's been a great husband and father off the set, as well. If he takes over JL I think it could have a sober, realistic setting much like Affleck's Gone Baby Gone, The Town, and Argo.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:07 PM
I just hope whatever threat that's used in JL, it would be treated visually like the threats in Pearl Harbor and Armageddon.
shauner111
08-08-2012, 10:08 PM
An announcement of Cavill will come first, maybe the end of the year or early next year. I think around the time of Man of Steel we'll hear of who the new Batman is and their plans for the reboot. The others, i guess sometime next year they would have to announce them all. I guess at the same time, for WW/Flash/GL.
cryptic name
08-08-2012, 10:13 PM
Really hope Affleck takes this one. I really enjoyed his two films so far and am greatly anticipating Argo. Would love to see what he would do, it'd be like seeing Nolan take on Begins all over again, the mystery of what a filmmaker like that would with a property like this.
Raiden
08-08-2012, 10:14 PM
I just hope whatever threat that's used in JL, it would be treated visually like the threats in Pearl Harbor and Armageddon.
You're thinking about Michael Bay, who's the director of both of these films.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:14 PM
You're thinking about Michael Bay, who's the director of both of these films.
Which also starred Affleck. I'm hoping he uses what worked in those films is all, I know he didn't direct them.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 10:14 PM
Maybe confirmation of Cavill and/or Reynolds beforehand I'd think.
They can hold off on cavill until the film comes out realistically. If the movie does very well I'm sure they'll use him because he is probably under contract. If the movie downright bombs they can just go ahead and cast someone else. Either way the storyline of man of steel probably wont affect much.
As for Reynolds, thats a tough one, I'm sure he would do it, them wanting him back is a different story. To be fair though, GL didnt turn out bad because of him, and he works well when he isnt the main star.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 10:21 PM
As for Reynolds, thats a tough one, I'm sure he would do it, them wanting him back is a different story.
Yeah. Seeing a Ryan Reynolds GL directed by Affleck would be promising... I think Reynolds is under contract for two more GL films until next year or 2014. (Routh said his contract option expired in 2009, three years after SR.)
BenReilly
08-08-2012, 10:25 PM
The good thing about Green Lantern is that they wouldn't even need to recast if they chose not to bring Ryan Reynolds back.
Just go TAS route by using John Stewart and they're good to go.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:26 PM
I don't see them not using Reynolds honestly. I don't see him being recast, and I don't see them using Jon Stewart.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 10:28 PM
I don't see them not using Reynolds honestly. I don't see him being recast, and I don't see them using Jon Stewart.
You have a point there.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:28 PM
I don't see them not using Reynolds honestly. I don't see him being recast, and I don't see them using Jon Stewart.
same here, im certain he will be in this.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:29 PM
It just seems like a lot of work to not get Reynolds back, and it's not like they solely blame him for the failure of Green Lantern.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 10:30 PM
I don't see them not using Reynolds honestly. I don't see him being recast, and I don't see them using Jon Stewart.
Regardless of how people say DC entertainment has done nothing, I think the whole point was corporate synergy. So when you see hal on the big screen, you see hal in the comics and the tv show. Thats why I don't see John Stewart being used.
If they have Reynolds under contract, which I'm sure they do, why not bring him back. No one saw GL anyways judging by the box office. If they can do something good with his character, its only a positive.
And even the people who hate reynolds have to admit that he went above and beyond trying to promote the film, he genuinely seemed like he believed in the project. There are a lot of movie stars who couldn't care less to do that.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:31 PM
Well I don't know the credibility of Examiner, but they're on the same page with Deadline saying Affleck denies involvement.
http://www.examiner.com/article/ben-affleck-representitives-deny-justice-league-movie-reports
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:33 PM
Well I don't know the credibility of Examiner, but they're on the same page with Deadline saying Affleck denies involvement.
http://www.examiner.com/article/ben-affleck-representitives-deny-justice-league-movie-reports
it probably is true as of now because he hasn't even sat down with them yet. i doubt he would turn this down if offered it. also wouldn't shock me if he took the job that he didn't bring kevin smith onboard as a consultant.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 10:40 PM
Well I don't know the credibility of Examiner, but they're on the same page with Deadline saying Affleck denies involvement.
http://www.examiner.com/article/ben-affleck-representitives-deny-justice-league-movie-reports
Like what the other articles said, WB has formally offered Affleck the gig (or at least sent it to his agent). But it's all up to Affleck if he wants to do it, so no one's wrong or right at this point.
It's a big job, to be sure. I hope he really thinks it over as opposed to "Nah, I like doing my own thing" or "Hey, my son would love me if I directed this!"
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:42 PM
Like what the other articles said, WB has formally offered Affleck the gig (or at least sent it to his agent). But it's all up to Affleck if he wants to do it, so no one's wrong or right at this point.
It's a big job, to be sure. I hope he really thinks it over as opposed to "Nah, I like doing my own thing" or "Hey, my son would love me if I directed this!"
i think he would be a fool to not even consider it.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:42 PM
Honestly, I think it would be a great move for him to accept if/when he gets offered.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 10:44 PM
It just seems like a lot of work to not get Reynolds back, and it's not like they solely blame him for the failure of Green Lantern.
I blame WB for a lot of what went wrong with GL. Release date set in stone, messy script, rushed overall. And the fact that they booted Legendary out from co-financing the pic (which could've mitigated that $200M they lost) speaks volumes about WB wanting all the money.
I think Reynolds deserves a second chance, in a good movie with a decent script. Especially with Affleck or whoever ends up directing JL.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:45 PM
I think Reynolds deserves a second chance, in a good movie with a decent script. Especially with Affleck or whoever ends up directing JL.
while i agree if you remember correctly we said the same for brandon with superman and look how that turned out.
Changeling
08-08-2012, 10:46 PM
My response to Ryan Reynolds returning for Justice League....
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-83khEULWDWk/UBkCzEipdtI/AAAAAAAABfA/nZD6Usn8aBA/s1600/lukeNOOOOOO.jpg
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:47 PM
Despite what I felt was a miscast, I didn't think he did bad. :huh:
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:48 PM
Despite what I felt was a miscast, I didn't think he did bad. :huh:
me neither, i didn't totally dislike the movie at all.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:48 PM
My response to Ryan Reynolds returning for Justice League....
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-83khEULWDWk/UBkCzEipdtI/AAAAAAAABfA/nZD6Usn8aBA/s1600/lukeNOOOOOO.jpg
that sums up how i feel about constant recasts.
Changeling
08-08-2012, 10:48 PM
I want no connection to that movie, and I thought he was really cheesy as Green Lantern. If he returns they need to completely change that costume. Maybe get rid of the mask altogether. Actually I definitely think he shouldnt have the mask, it looked so bad and didnt barely disguise him.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 10:49 PM
i think he would be a fool to not even consider it.
If I was him, I would definitely really think about it before deciding yay or nay on directing JL. Sometimes directors can benefit from challenging projects and help stretch their creative muscles. And sometimes, it can backfire (a la Martin Campbell on GL).
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:50 PM
If I was him, I would definitely really think about it before deciding yay or nay on directing JL. Sometimes directors can benefit from challenging projects and help stretch their creative muscles. And sometimes, it can backfire (a la Martin Campbell on GL).
first and foremost im shocked the wb are even considering him. second unless he has something really big in the works if i were him id strongly consider this project before just turning it down.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:51 PM
I want no connection to that movie, and I thought he was really cheesy as Green Lantern. If he returns they need to completely change that costume. Maybe get rid of the mask altogether. Actually I definitely think he shouldnt have the mask, it looked so bad and didnt barely disguise him.
Yeah, if I was in charge of his costume, I'd drop the full cgi; it was pointless and looked awful. I would combine different fabrics to make something look alien, but I would keep some of the subtle musculature of green aura on the body.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:52 PM
im more curious who might write the script for this? kevin smith anyone?
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:54 PM
im more curious who might write the script for this? kevin smith anyone?
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-83khEULWDWk/UBkCzEipdtI/AAAAAAAABfA/nZD6Usn8aBA/s1600/lukeNOOOOOO.jpg
mclay18
08-08-2012, 10:55 PM
while i agree if you remember correctly we said the same for brandon with superman and look how that turned out.
Yeah, but Henry Cavill isn't a pushover either. I wouldn't be opposed to a recast role for Hal Jordan (it's all in the casting), but I think it'd be easier for Warners to just exercise their option on Ryan Reynolds.
I want no connection to that movie, and I thought he was really cheesy as Green Lantern. If he returns they need to completely change that costume. Maybe get rid of the mask altogether. Actually I definitely think he shouldnt have the mask, it looked so bad and didnt barely disguise him.
The costume was fine... but it was obviously CGI for the most part (and a lot of it could've been solved if he wore a physical suit with CGI enhancements). I have no clue why Martin Campbell didn't insist on Reynolds wearing a domino mask -- the CGI on that mask was terrible. WB could've saved a couple of million by having Reynolds wear a real mask and spend that somewhere else.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 10:56 PM
first and foremost im shocked the wb are even considering him. second unless he has something really big in the works if i were him id strongly consider this project before just turning it down.
Like the deadline article pointed out, they first let Nolan look at scripts, then yates and affleck. Those are there go to directors and I'm sure they like to keep them happy.
Nolan was a huge risk giving batman too considering his filmography prior to begins. Plus Marvel got Whedon for avengers, not like he was a tested film director with big budget action films.
If anything, we would be lucky if they can give it to a director that will focus on the story more than the explosions.
TheScarecrow
08-08-2012, 10:56 PM
im more curious who might write the script for this? kevin smith anyone?
The script (or at least a draft of it) has already been written.
Despite these other sources picking the story up, there are only two original source: Variety and Deadline. Variety says it has been offered. Deadline does not dispute this. Deadline says he won't accept it. Variety never said he would.
So there's no competing stories here at all (I wonder if Deadline misread the Variety article). In respect of Affleck's reps denying it, whether he decides to do it or not, it's not a surprise they're denying he will at this point. If they come out and said "yes, Ben's so excited!" etc, he loses all bargaining power. He and his reps would be playing it cool, or even cold, so that he can get everything he wants, which no doubt includes full creative control and no interference by the studio. That doesn't come easy, and he'd need every bargaining chip he has. If they knew he was going to do it anyway, he'd get nothing.
Like the deadline article pointed out, they first let Nolan look at scripts, then yates and affleck. Those are there go to directors and I'm sure they like to keep them happy.
Nolan was a huge risk giving batman too considering his filmography prior to begins. Plus Marvel got Whedon for avengers, not like he was a tested film director with big budget action films.
If anything, we would be lucky if they can give it to a director that will focus on the story more than the explosions.
Brad Bird next please!
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:56 PM
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-83khEULWDWk/UBkCzEipdtI/AAAAAAAABfA/nZD6Usn8aBA/s1600/lukeNOOOOOO.jpg
either way i see him having some sort of involvement in this especially if ben takes the job.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 10:58 PM
Like the deadline article pointed out, they first let Nolan look at scripts, then yates and affleck. Those are there go to directors and I'm sure they like to keep them happy.
Didn't Nolan establish that MoS was his last comic related movie he had any involvement in with WB? :huh:
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:58 PM
Despite these other sources picking the story up, there are only two original source: Variety and Deadline. Variety says it has been offered. Deadline does not dispute this. Deadline says he won't accept it. Variety never said he would.
So there's no competing stories here at all (I wonder if Deadline misread the Variety article). In respect of Affleck's reps denying it, whether he decides to do it or not, it's not a surprise they're denying he will at this point. If they come out and said "yes, Ben's so excited!" etc, he loses all bargaining power. He and his reps would be playing it cool, or even cold, so that he can get everything he wants, which no doubt includes full creative control and no interference by the studio. That doesn't come easy, and he'd need every bargaining chip he has. If they knew he was going to do it anyway, he'd get nothing.
good point.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 10:59 PM
Didn't Nolan establish that MoS was his last comic related movie he had any involvement in with WB? :huh:
for the right amount of money im sure he would come back.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 11:01 PM
for the right amount of money im sure he would come back.
Oh I'm sure too, but he's not the "DCE Godfather" of WB like some here thought he was.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 11:02 PM
Didn't Nolan establish that MoS was his last comic related movie he had any involvement in with WB? :huh:
I was talking generally with all projects, not just the comic book related ones. Even if Nolan had no intentions to do it, out of respect you have him take a look to see if he's interested, especially after he revived a dead batman franchise and inception which made a lot of money for the studio.
You don't want him going to another studio with his original ideas.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 11:02 PM
Oh I'm sure too, but he's not the "DCE Godfather" of WB like some here thought he was.
lol whole nother thread there but i agree. i wasn't a huge fan of the nolan batman flicks and im not thrilled about superman begins either.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 11:03 PM
I didn't find anything he did all original. :huh:
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 11:04 PM
Oh I'm sure too, but he's not the "DCE Godfather" of WB like some here thought he was.
I think people jumped the gun when they read that article. I never took away that he was, just that WB probably wanted him to be.
You can't blame him after doing 3 batman films and producing a superman film that he would be a bit burnt out with the genre.
Damn. Got my hopes up :csad:.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 11:08 PM
I didn't find anything he did all original. :huh:
You didn't think inception was original?
If he had more ideas like that (especially being successful) would you not want to see what else he could come up with.
mclay18
08-08-2012, 11:08 PM
Assuming Affleck does accept this gig, solely as a director -- who would he hire to do the cinematography and score? He's picked some great guys to shoot his films, like Robert Elswit, Rodrigo Prieto, and John Toll. I would love to see Prieto tackle a movie like JL. The guy knows his stuff.
I'm a little less anxious who he'd pick to score the film. Harry Gregson-Williams (Gone Baby Gone, The Town) would be an okay choice, but Alexandre Desplat (Argo) would be a GREAT pick.
fixxxer1022
08-08-2012, 11:09 PM
Damn. Got my hopes up :csad:.
nothing is confirmed yet.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 11:12 PM
You didn't think inception was original?
Not really. Heavy inspiration from paintings and a direct rip-off of a Scrooge comic.
If he had more ideas like that (especially being successful) would you not want to see what else he could come up with.
I am interested in seeing more from him, but not eagerly anticipating anything.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 11:16 PM
Not really. Heavy inspiration from paintings and a direct rip-off of a Scrooge comic.
I am interested in seeing more from him, but not eagerly anticipating anything.
Is there ever really an original idea if you look at it that way, lol.
Either way, its like they are building his name into a brand. If his films continue to make money, you want to be the studio collecting it. Starting with not upsetting him.
Majik1387
08-08-2012, 11:18 PM
Is there ever really an original idea if you look at it that way, lol.
There's plenty, Inception just wasn't one of them for me, sorry.
Either way, its like they are building his name into a brand. If his films continue to make money, you want to be the studio collecting it. Starting with not upsetting him.
While I agree, again I see you giving Nolan too much credit. Sure they'll try not to upset him, but if what WB wants goes against what he wants, WB pulls rank.
shauner111
08-08-2012, 11:21 PM
Nolans one of my favourite directors of all time. I adore his Batman trilogy. But it's time to move on.
Batman must always move forward. Don't repeat things of the past. If you can't move in a forward direction and do something that hasn't been done with the character, then take a long break.
Justice League is important to me too, because as a massive Bat-fan it effects the next series of movies for him. And JLA has never happened so im back to being psyched about it. ESPECIALLY if somebody like Affleck is attached.
solidsnake86
08-08-2012, 11:22 PM
There's plenty, Inception just wasn't one of them for me, sorry.
While I agree, again I see you giving Nolan too much credit. Sure they'll try not to upset him, but if what WB wants goes against what he wants, WB pulls rank.
But were talking about different things at this point. Its clear he's done with the dc films, I'm saying that WB is going to show him other projects that they want him to consider.
I'm sure he knows that batman is there character and at this point they will do what they want with it, including trying to get bale back if they felt the need to. Nolan would be naive to think otherwise and also naive to think any other studio wouldnt do the same.
Its not really giving him to much credit when he's produced critically acclaimed films that have made a lot of money at the box office. Just because you may not like his stuff doesn't mean you can't recognize the success of it.
Revenger
08-08-2012, 11:34 PM
i'm not optimistic about been affleck doing this. the deadline report worries me
tekken
08-09-2012, 12:00 AM
Seems like a good idea to me, why are people *****ing?
JosephCAW
08-09-2012, 12:15 AM
he's in he's out.....wow......the reports for this are both within the same day so I'm incline to think its not true.
If Affleck is involved, I'm not sure if I'm for it or against it
shauner111
08-09-2012, 12:28 AM
He's coming along as a director no doubt, but his writing is probably the highlight. With his acting falling under the other 2. Even though he's decent at that.
The only reason why i think he fits something as wild as Justice League is because of who is writing the script. Or should i say the word going around about what kind of writer he is, and what subject manner he has experience in. Which is more of a crime element with what looks like a bit of fun thrown in there. Not your "traditional" crime screenwriter i guess.
Add to that, the talk of WB trying to let JLA take a more mature direction compared to Marvels movies. That's a damn good fit for Affleck.
Im starting to get too attached now, and before i know it he's going to refuse because he has other genres in mind. Which will be a damn shame.
cryptic name
08-09-2012, 12:50 AM
There's plenty, Inception just wasn't one of them for me, sorry.
While I agree, again I see you giving Nolan too much credit. Sure they'll try not to upset him, but if what WB wants goes against what he wants, WB pulls rank.
WB wanted Rises in 3D. They wanted The Riddler as the villain. I think you're not giving his pull at WB enough credit.
GREEN =w= DAY
08-09-2012, 02:42 AM
i gotta say, Affleck directing Justice League is a total out of left field choice. but i like it! Gone Baby Gone was a very good film and The Town was one of my favorite films of 2011. given enough time and a good script, i think Affleck will pleasantly surprise all of us.
even if we don't get solo films leading up to JL like Marvel did with Avengers, i think this can still be a quality film. i recently read Justice League: Origin of the New 52 series and i thought it was well done how all these heroes came together. if the script were to take cues from that and from Singer's X-Men films because of such a large ensemble, then we will be in for a hell of a film.
and if he were to star in the film as well, i can definitely see him playing Maxwell Lord - that is if he is still involved in this newer version of JL.
Changeling
08-09-2012, 02:55 AM
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of him playing Maxwell Lord rather than someone on the team.
flickchick85
08-09-2012, 03:09 AM
What I've surmised from the conflicting reports is that WB is definitely eyeing Affleck for the gig, but Deadline spoke directly to his reps, and they said he may take a meeting at most, but ultimately isn't interested in the job. So no one's lying. Variety is correct - WB does want him - Deadline just has further info (Affleck's not interested).
So if that's the case, I'm liking the sound of Yates for this. In fact, if it came down to the two, I would prefer Yates for this. His State of Play was amazing and his work on the HP movies was very good - just behind Cuaron's, imo. He's good with actors and has demonstrated far more visual flair than Affleck, so I think he'd be a better fit anyway.
craigdbfan
08-09-2012, 03:13 AM
What I've surmised from the conflicting reports is that WB is definitely eyeing Affleck for the gig, but Deadline spoke directly to his reps, and they said he may take a meeting at most, but ultimately isn't interested in the job. So no one's lying. Variety is correct - WB does want him - Deadline just has further info (Affleck's not interested).
So if that's the case, I'm liking the sound of Yates for this. In fact, if it came down to the two, I would prefer Yates for this. His State of Play was amazing and his work on the HP movies was very good - just behind Cuaron's, imo. He's good with actors and has demonstrated far more visual flair than Affleck, so I think he'd be a better fit anyway.That's a good analysis of the situation. :up:
chamber-music
08-09-2012, 03:44 AM
I wouldn't mind David Yates because with a good script he can do pretty great stuff like his TV stuff Sex Traffic and State Of Play and obviously his had experience on big budget movies with the Harry Potter franchise.
I don't think Affleck is going to do Justice League as he doesn't seem intrested in Superhero movies going by what his said in public post Daredevil. Yates is a more safe choice than Affleck I guess which is either a good or bad thing depending on your own point of view.
LauraT
08-09-2012, 04:34 AM
What I've surmised from the conflicting reports is that WB is definitely eyeing Affleck for the gig, but Deadline spoke directly to his reps, and they said he may take a meeting at most, but ultimately isn't interested in the job. So no one's lying. Variety is correct - WB does want him - Deadline just has further info (Affleck's not interested).
Very succinct clarification.
I also think it's true that:
1) It is not a coincidence that WB leaked the possibility of an exciting, buzz worthy director being offered the project less than 48 hours after Joss Whedon is not only confirmed for Avengers 2 in 2015 but looks set to become the "godfather" of the MCU in the same way they wanted Nolan, not to mention the rights deals speculation. They want new buzz for JL at the same time regardless of how likely it actually is BA would direct, they wanted to get the ball rolling.
2) It is possible Affleck is interested playing negotiating tactics, there have been people announced for projects who swore they weren't involved, there was speculation that Whedon wasn't interested when the list of frontrunners was leaked. However it is interesting that Deadline outright called BS instead of "clarifiying" it like they did with FOX vs Marvel.
3) No matter how nuts you think someone might be to pass on this job, no top tier director will want to come aboard this project unless they're passionate about it and convinced they can make it be seen as more than "poor man's Avengers".
Bruce_Begins
08-09-2012, 04:38 AM
Hiring a director that is not interested will result in "poor man's Avengers".
Just saw this. I LOVE Affleck as adirector, would be thrilled if he took this. Who would he cast himself as, though? A villain? I could actually kinda see him as Aquaman, too.
LauraT
08-09-2012, 06:14 AM
Hiring a director that is not interested will result in "poor man's Avengers".
Yes, WB badly need a new Nolan for this type of project, maybe more than any other you need someone who understands and is passionate about the concept and characters. Affleck could be a good choice, IF he wants to do it but there's no evidence so far that this isn't just WB trying to generate some buzz.
Ben Affleck? This must be fake, the guy said he never wanted to do a superhero movie again and that he felt silly while wearing the costume
Project862006
08-09-2012, 06:45 AM
you really think affleck would ditch Stephen King's THE STAND For JL?
marcvader
08-09-2012, 07:17 AM
Deadline is reporting that he already turned this down.
BH/HHH
08-09-2012, 07:24 AM
Why do people not read?
Variety have reported that WBs have approached Affleck about directing JL and they're expetected to meet.
Deadline have reported that Afflecks reps have said he is not interested but Affleck will still take a meeting with him.
Deadline haven't debunked Variety's story they've added info to it that wasn't known that's all.
Bruce_Begins
08-09-2012, 07:35 AM
I think that while Ben Afleck may not take up the JL project, he may be persuaded for some other DC property, like solo Batman movie.
BH/HHH
08-09-2012, 07:48 AM
I think that while Ben Afleck may not take up the JL project, he may be persuaded for some other DC property, like solo Batman movie.
That'd probably be more down his alley as it'd be more grounded. I wonder if he could convince his pal Matt Damon to play James Gordon.
craigdbfan
08-09-2012, 07:56 AM
Holy crud. It never crossed my mine but Matt Damon at this stage in his career could definitely play Gordon.
http://i.imgur.com/dkXMx.jpg
I guess in my mind he's still the Matt Damon I knew from Dogma. How time flies. :hehe:
Ben Affleck? This must be fake, the guy said he never wanted to do a superhero movie again and that he felt silly while wearing the costume
He was talking about being in front of the camera, this would be as director.
FilmNerdJamie
08-09-2012, 08:05 AM
Why do people not read?
Variety have reported that WBs have approached Affleck about directing JL and they're expetected to meet.
Deadline have reported that Afflecks reps have said he is not interested but Affleck will still take a meeting with him.
Deadline haven't debunked Variety's story they've added info to it that wasn't known that's all.
Mike Fleming is a prick and jealous Jeff Sneider scooped him.
LMAO always love your bluntness Jamie :D
OsGom
08-09-2012, 08:40 AM
I'm not sure Ben has the directing experience to pull this off yet, but i am not opposed to giving him a shot.
Rowsdower!
08-09-2012, 09:30 AM
Well, if Ben is definitely out, who else should they look at?
I'm thinking about Tom Tykwer now. WB is releasing his movie Cloud Atlas in a couple months and if they does well (commercially and/or critically) they might consider handing the keys to him. I absolutely love his film Run Lola Run and if Cloud Atlas is as good as it looks, I'd be down with him doing Justice League. However, it is important to note that he shared direction on Cloud Atlas with the Wachowskis.
shauner111
08-09-2012, 09:31 AM
I want him to take this, but there's probably a bigger chance of him doing Batman than Justice League.
One thing that is awesome about this, is if they're offering somebody like Affleck..and they know his style and what he likes and doesnt like to an extent. Then they're not only after quality directors, but one that fits the tone of the script. The fact that they wanted Nolan to produce with Affleck to direct is good news.
Wont surprise me if he says no but i like where they're going with this.
shauner111
08-09-2012, 09:34 AM
Ben is not definately out. There's still a chance. But we shouldnt moan too much if he rejects the offer because you dont want him taking it if he's not interested. These movies only ever work when somebody is passionate behind the camera.
Bruce_Begins
08-09-2012, 09:39 AM
The script must be good if they thought that by reading it Ben Afleck could be persuaded to direct the movie .
shauner111
08-09-2012, 09:45 AM
Exactly.
Rowsdower!
08-09-2012, 10:02 AM
Yeah. It's a good sign though that they are going after a guy like Affleck, even if he doesn't take it. At least they are looking at serious directors who can get great performances out their actors.
I'm hoping that the days of waking up to headlines like "BARBERSHOP DIRECTOR TO HELM FANTASTIC FOUR" are long gone.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 10:34 AM
This blog summarised my feelings about the whole deadline vs variety.
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/has-ben-affleck-already-said-no-to-direct-justice-league-20120808
Its obvious WB has been releasing all their top secret news to Variety since they're both subsidiaries of Time Warner.
Its also obvious that Nikki Finke is really competitive and the fact that they heard about the news from rival Variety must've got them really upset. Perhaps its true that Ben Affleck's people denied that he is going to be taking up the job, but it could've been easily to brush them off cos of the NDA that Ben Affleck must have signed.
Variety also said that they got Ben for weeks already and it doesn't make sense to release the news after Ben Affleck turned WB down on its offer. So, I'm siding with Variety on this who has released the statement that WB is eyeing Ben Affleck to take on this project and he is still considering the offer.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 10:36 AM
Why do people not read?
Variety have reported that WBs have approached Affleck about directing JL and they're expetected to meet.
Deadline have reported that Afflecks reps have said he is not interested but Affleck will still take a meeting with him.
Deadline haven't debunked Variety's story they've added info to it that wasn't known that's all.
Deadline also accused Variety to imply that WB would get Ben Affleck for the job which Variety did not.
I stand by what some of these ppl are saying. They're just jealous Variety got the scoop.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 10:40 AM
Another blog debunking Deadline story
http://www.comicsbeat.com/2012/08/09/ben-affleck-justice-league-story-hooey-or-a-delaying-tactic/
Which is to say, Deadline are saying that Affleck’s people are saying that he’s about to waste both his and the studio’s time on a meeting about a film he certainly isn’t going to direct.
Assuming that this can be believe, I can only read it as playing hard to get by Affleck and team, if filtered through a bit of Variety-trashing by Nikki Finke and Deadline.
Which probably goes some way to convincing me Affleck might actually be wanting the gig.If Ben Affleck is certainly not going to take up the project, why still meet up with WB?
mclay18
08-09-2012, 10:41 AM
So, I'm siding with Variety on this who has released the statement that WB is eyeing Ben Affleck to take on this project and he is still considering the offer.
Yeah. Mike Fleming should take his humble pie and move on... outscoop Variety on something else.
Geez, quit making this a pi***ng contest.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 10:42 AM
Yeah. Mike Fleming should take his humble pie and move on... outscoop Variety on something else.
Geez, quit making this a pi***ng contest.
I mean deadline is the industry's best source for movies and TV news. No wonder they're upset.
raybia
08-09-2012, 10:44 AM
If I had to guess I say he'll turn it down but you never know. He has knocked back a number of movies from WB and he may finally be inclined to say yes...especially if WB sweetens the package.
Just like WB gave Nolan Carte Blanc to make Inception, they may do the same with Affleck.
Chewy
08-09-2012, 10:44 AM
lol there are no stories to "debunk" here, linking to dinky comics blogs is sort of pointless
All we know is that WB sent Affleck a script, he might meet with them, and his camp says he's not interested
The rest is speculative fluff and hit whoring
Personally I think he turns it down, he seem to love making the mid-budget flicks. They aren't too shabby, either
raybia
08-09-2012, 10:46 AM
Well, if Ben is definitely out, who else should they look at?
I'm thinking about Tom Tykwer now. WB is releasing his movie Cloud Atlas in a couple months and if they does well (commercially and/or critically) they might consider handing the keys to him. I absolutely love his film Run Lola Run and if Cloud Atlas is as good as it looks, I'd be down with him doing Justice League. However, it is important to note that he shared direction on Cloud Atlas with the Wachowskis.
To me this is a no brainer its why I'm fustrated with Hollywood but Brad Bird was born to direct JL.
raybia
08-09-2012, 10:55 AM
I want him to take this, but there's probably a bigger chance of him doing Batman than Justice League.
One thing that is awesome about this, is if they're offering somebody like Affleck..and they know his style and what he likes and doesnt like to an extent. Then they're not only after quality directors, but one that fits the tone of the script. The fact that they wanted Nolan to produce with Affleck to direct is good news.
Wont surprise me if he says no but i like where they're going with this.
I think it would make perfect sense if WB offered Affleck the Batman franchise if he directs JL.
That would also allow the incarnation of Batman in Justice League to be the same one in the new Batman reboot.
Introduce Batman in JL (but not Bruce Wayne) as a loner who at some point it becomes obvious to all the heroes that Batman is the one who should lead them.
Then the JL would lead into the new Batman movie with him already established in Gotham (maybe like year 3).
Rowsdower!
08-09-2012, 10:56 AM
To me this is a no brainer its why I'm fustrated with Hollywood but Brad Bird was born to direct JL.
Agreed, I'd like Brad Bird too.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 11:00 AM
lol there are no stories to "debunk" here, linking to dinky comics blogs is sort of pointless
All we know is that WB sent Affleck a script, he might meet with them, and his camp says he's not interested
The rest is speculative fluff and hit whoring
Personally I think he turns it down, he seem to love making the mid-budget flicks. They aren't too shabby, either
If he already turned it down why did WB ask Variety to report it?
Also if he already turned it down, why waste his time and WB's time to go for another meeting soon?
The fact that he is going for the meeting means he is interested.
raybia
08-09-2012, 11:08 AM
Agreed, I'd like Brad Bird too.
I really don't get it. He proved he can do it with movies like The Incredibles and the Iron Giant. Then he confirmed that can work with live actors in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.
He also showed he can do it from a box office standpoint as the production budget of MI4 was $145 million and the movie made worldwide $694.7 million.
Motown Marvel
08-09-2012, 11:11 AM
i just heard this news...it's totally out of left field....and im totally not opposed to it.
Rowsdower!
08-09-2012, 11:13 AM
I really don't get it. He proved he can do it with movies like The Incredibles and the Iron Giant. Then he confirmed that can work with live actors in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.
He also showed he can do it from a box office standpoint as the production budget of MI4 was $145 million and the movie made worldwide $694.7 million.
Well, he might be on their shortlist, so we'll see.
shauner111
08-09-2012, 11:13 AM
Brad Bird is a great choice, way better than Yates..if Affleck declines.
Affleck will bring something very different to JLA to make it standout. But Brad Bird is right for it just like Whedon was right for Avengers.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 11:21 AM
I would not mind David Yates do Wonder Woman and Brad Bird go with Flash.
Chewy
08-09-2012, 11:21 AM
If he already turned it down why did WB ask Variety to report it?
Also if he already turned it down, why waste his time and WB's time to go for another meeting soon?
The fact that he is going for the meeting means he is interested.
I think you may have misread my post? And the Deadline article? Neither of which says he already turned it down?
sethypants
08-09-2012, 11:27 AM
I think you may have misread my post? And the Deadline article? Neither of which says he already turned it down?
Deadline said
This is a story I checked out days ago, and didn’t run when Affleck’s reps stated that it was not going to happen with him.
I doubt Deadline would not report a news about WB offering Ben Affleck just because his reps said its not going to happen with him. This seems to imply WB offered Ben Affleck and he reject it outright. So theres no point in reporting the news "a few days ago" Because its 100% not going to happen. Because if there is even 10% chance of Ben Affleck accepting the project isn't it worth reporting?
Then Deadline said
Just because the studio wants Affleck doesn’t mean he will do the movie, and several sources tell me he might take a meeting, but that’s it.
So they're saying he will definitely 100% not take the movie, but waste WB's time by going for a meeting.
Rowsdower!
08-09-2012, 11:32 AM
Yeah, that doesn't make sense.
Ben Affleck has a 60 percent chance of working on this movie, every time.
shauner111
08-09-2012, 11:33 AM
Affleck for JL or Batman.
Bird for JL or Wonder Woman.
Yates for JL, Wonder Woman or Flash.
Ruben Fleischer for Flash.
Nicolas Refn for Batman or Wonder Woman.
AHHH so many possibilities.
shauner111
08-09-2012, 11:34 AM
Yeah, that doesn't make sense.
Ben Affleck has a 60 percent chance of working on this movie, every time.
:hehe:
raybia
08-09-2012, 11:46 AM
Affleck for JL or Batman.
Bird for JL or Wonder Woman.
Yates for JL, Wonder Woman or Flash.
Ruben Fleischer for Flash.
Nicolas Refn for Batman or Wonder Woman.
AHHH so many possibilities.
I would be okay with Affleck for Batman but after the Nolan series, which I adore, I'm ready for a different take (more comicky along the lines of BTAS or even Arkum Asylum.
For that reason there is only one person for me who would make me forget about every other possibility in a heartbeat and thats:
Guillermo Del Toro
Chewy
08-09-2012, 11:51 AM
Yeah, that doesn't make sense.
Ben Affleck has a 60 percent chance of working on this movie, every time.
B-
Effort was there but the execution was wobbly :)
Rowsdower!
08-09-2012, 11:58 AM
Haha, yeah you're right. But if you waver too much from the original wording, you run the risk of people not catching the reference at all.
mclay18
08-09-2012, 12:01 PM
I mean deadline is the industry's best source for movies and TV news. No wonder they're upset.
Fleming and Finke have been out-scooped at times... not just by Variety, but Latino Review as well. Sometimes, those folks are better connected than those two old fogies.
shauner111
08-09-2012, 12:15 PM
I would be okay with Affleck for Batman but after the Nolan series, which I adore, I'm ready for a different take (more comicky along the lines of BTAS or even Arkum Asylum.
For that reason there is only one person for me who would make me forget about every other possibility in a heartbeat and thats:
Guillermo Del Toro
Yeah my picks for Batman are usually the Refns, etc but i also want an Arkham City/TAS tone so it probably wont work.
sethypants
08-09-2012, 12:49 PM
Fleming and Finke have been out-scooped at times... not just by Variety, but Latino Review as well. Sometimes, those folks are better connected than those two old fogies.
thats true.
az824
08-09-2012, 01:10 PM
No Yates please! He sucks hard! I hope Affleck accepts!
cryptic name
08-09-2012, 01:31 PM
Affleck for JL or Batman.
Bird for JL or Wonder Woman.
Yates for JL, Wonder Woman or Flash.
Ruben Fleischer for Flash.
Nicolas Refn for Batman or Wonder Woman.
AHHH so many possibilities.
I want to see Duncan Jones take a crack at Flash.
chamber-music
08-09-2012, 01:42 PM
I think Duncan Jones will do a superhero movie eventually. He didn't get Man Of Steel or The Wolverine and he turned down Judge Dredd.
MarvelKnight
08-09-2012, 01:56 PM
Affleck has passed just about as fast as it took to get the rumor up lol. Back to square one.
mclay18
08-09-2012, 02:04 PM
Affleck has passed just about as fast as it took to get the rumor up lol. Back to square one.
Uh, we don't know that. Don't take Toldja's word for it, they're just mad Variety got to it first. All Fleming's article consisted of was trash-talking Variety, and that Affleck may meet with WB to talk about the gig.
Nothing is concrete yet.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.