The SuperHeroHype Forums

The SuperHeroHype Forums (http://forums.superherohype.com/index.php)
-   The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (http://forums.superherohype.com/forumdisplay.php?f=464)
-   -   The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83 (http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=481575)

Thread Manager 06-20-2014 04:39 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - Part 82
 
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is Here

Thread Manager 06-20-2014 04:39 PM

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - Part 82
 
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is Here

AF3619 06-20-2014 04:39 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - Part 82
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OriginalMiles (Post 29103225)
I really want this to be true for one reason.

The Raimi/Webb decade separation.

lol, it´s all conected! and another conection every spider-man that doesn´t have a final swing are the ones that have a bad reception

Airnick 06-20-2014 04:40 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
I have a feeling that "push back" rumor is false.

AF3619 06-20-2014 04:41 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Airnick (Post 29103281)
I have a feeling that "push back" rumor is false.

yeaah, we would´ve had a confirmation and/or denial now

OriginalMiles 06-20-2014 04:45 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - Part 82
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AF3619 (Post 29103261)
lol, it´s all conected! and another conection every spider-man that doesn´t have a final swing are the ones that have a bad reception

The final swing has subliminal messages I tell you! :argh:

:oldrazz:

spider-neil 06-20-2014 05:06 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Airnick (Post 29103281)
I have a feeling that "push back" rumor is false.


Look at the franchises Sony has. Spidey, Bond, Smurf (at a push), Ghostbusters. It's not like they are WB and have a raft of properties so Spidey can be put on the back burner.

I SEE SPIDEY 06-20-2014 05:22 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Sony haven't denied that 2017 rumor.

I'd be shocked if they don't push the film back so that they have time to look over what went wrong.

UltimateWebhead 06-20-2014 05:35 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by I SEE SPIDEY (Post 29103687)
Sony haven't denied that 2017 rumor.

I'd be shocked if they don't push the film back so that they have time to look over what went wrong.

I hope the rumor is accurate. They're probably not ready to make an official statement.

Spider-knight 06-20-2014 05:45 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
I frigging hope that rumor is true. If not then they'll be ****ed that the crimson viper from game of thrones

BRAB 06-20-2014 10:51 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
What does that even mean Spider-Knight?

Spider-knight 06-20-2014 10:57 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BRAB (Post 29105537)
What does that even mean Spider-Knight?

Just watch game of thrones the mountain vs the viper and see it for yourself

BRAB 06-20-2014 11:09 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
oh rightio

LEVITIKUZ 06-21-2014 09:35 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
So yesterday, Mike & Mike was having a Eddie Murphy discussion. After, I decided to watch some of Eddie's older stand up and films.

I thought, wouldn't Eddie be great for J Jonah Jameson? Think about it.

OriginalMiles 06-21-2014 09:37 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Eddie Murphy as JJJ? Um, maybe.

I'd prefer John C. McGinley though. (or the return of J.K. Simmons! :grin:)

LEVITIKUZ 06-21-2014 09:38 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
If prefer JK back too but Eddie would kill it.

OriginalMiles 06-21-2014 09:40 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
I do agree that Eddie could do a great job. I really like his stuff.

SpeterMan3 06-21-2014 11:41 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
That would be interesting...

And oh, hey guys.

Airnick 06-21-2014 11:54 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeterMan3 (Post 29108275)
That would be interesting...

And oh, hey guys.

Welcome back.

Spider-knight 06-21-2014 11:58 AM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
I don't like Eddie to be Jameson and its not because he's black but I believe he's been in a number of god awful movies I don't want him to go near spiderman nor any comic book movies. Plus it'd be weird to see him in something dramatic

Em Dee 06-21-2014 01:37 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
I would not be surprised if they casted Kevin Hart because it'd bring more money :o

OriginalMiles 06-21-2014 01:42 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
I had to google Kevin Hart.

NewYorkSpider 06-21-2014 01:48 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OriginalMiles (Post 29107835)
Eddie Murphy as JJJ? Um, maybe.

I'd prefer John C. McGinley though. (or the return of J.K. Simmons! :grin:)

I would love John C. McGinley as JJJ. I think he'd be perfect.

OriginalMiles 06-21-2014 01:53 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
:highfive:

Seriously, if he played an angrier version of his Scrubs character, that would be JJJ.

OriginalMiles 06-21-2014 01:54 PM

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - Part 83
 
Post of double.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com, A property of Mandatory, a divison of AtomicOnline, LLC © 2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.