Originally Posted by Weadazoid
Does Singer even know what he is really talking about? I just don
t get it.. I know the whole someone that knows Superman and is from his past thing really spouted alot of this ZOd talk... but first of all it's a terrible idea..and really it aint like Wrath at all.
The thing that made Wrath so great was... the history that was created by the Show... Kahn was without a doubt one of Kircks greatest enemies and the plot they weaved around Khan to make mae him even more insane and out for Kircks blood was Dynamic.....
There is no TV show plot to draw from ..... so what you bring back Zod.... even though Zod died....something clearly very diferent from Khan who was left ona City Alpha that then became a wasteland.
Where is the mad revenge plot? Zod didn't have to suffer through anything he was made human and then frozen if anything.
So what Luthor goes back and gets Zods Body and somehow makes him Kryptonina again? But where is the need for Wrath???? where is the prolonged suffering?
Does Singer even know why the Wrath of Khan was so great???
As I see it, 'Wrath of Khan" is seen as one of the ultimate sequels, where the action and intensity was amped up. That's what Singer wants--a sequel that blows SR out of the water.
"For a time we tried to contact them by radio but no response. Then they attacked a town, a small town I'll admit, but never the less a town of people, people who died."