View Single Post
Old 07-05-2008, 12:24 AM   #71
xero1186's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 567
Default Re: Am I the only one who feels like B'89 is vastly overrated?

Originally Posted by COMICFILMEXPERT View Post
So explain to me how in "Batman: Year One" Bruce goes from bleeding in his father's study to attacking three punks in the full-on Batsuit...I mean Bruce was starting up as Batman THEN as well as in "Begins". Why didn't Miller explain the suit to us?

Believe me I DO understand...completely.

Because Miller wrote Batman: Year One to talk about his "First YEAR" as Batman. Batman Begins is his ascension to becoming Batman. Year One only shows 14 pages of Bruce as he comes back to Gotham, fighting some thugs, bleeding in the study and then BAM next page he's Batman. Batman Begins isn't Batman Year One, and it wasn't trying to be. I DO think it was used as a nice reference point for the character's development.

There are a lot more things wrong with the 89 Batman over the Begins Batman but as many have said, and I agree, without it we wouldn't be where we are as it is another level of Batman's growing lore over the last almost 75 years.

Back off man, I'm a scientist

Last edited by xero1186; 07-05-2008 at 12:38 AM.
xero1186 is offline   Reply With Quote