Originally Posted by solidsnake86
Now your just making stuff up. They have failed to exploit the franchise, really?
So they've been content with losing money on the character all these years. Unless theres something wrong with me I remember there being a lois and clark television series, superman the animated series, smallville on tv for 10 seasons, Superman returns and him still being printed in the comics including the New Krypton crossover which was supposed to be his big event and most of all having Jim on the title for 12 issues, grant morisson on all-star, jms on earth one and releasing a hardcover edition. If thats not exploiting the character I don't know what is
You're choosing to ignore things because you don't like the way its turned out. No one can flip a switch and make things successful because every company would be doing it. Batman wasn't a billion dollar franchise before the dark knight which was frankly a fluke do to a host of things. If WB is failing at using superman they must be really dropping the ball with the rest of their characters not named superman and batman.
LOL exactly. In addition I don't understand the logic behind "Superman comics are outsold by other dc titles so the franchise is dead and only a mad would invest on it".
Is he talking about Green Lantern? Because GL movie is a terrible flop, so where is the connection between comics sales and the real power/potential of a brand?