Originally Posted by KalMart
Superman wouldn't have been a huge iconic character if National and later DC hadn't turned him into one. But anyway.....I guess there's something about art being for the masses, and having the ability to inspire the growth of art over generations without having to pay a toll for it every single time for ever and ever. Or something....
moreover, I am strongly against inheritance past a certain point. Why should some dim wit, 3 generations later be allowed to profit from something they've made no contribution to? Sure, there should be some inheritance, ie. 1 or 2 generations, but it shouldn't go beyond that, unless like I said, they've made a solid contribution to the growth of the property. They must be worthy