That's a fair reason not to quote
I agree, it does happen and probably would if we continued.
I'm not going to go any further with this 'trope' stuff because I honestly don't see how fitting the two Superheroes into simplistic archtypes helps us achieve any sort of conclusion on who is the more realistic.
I guess the only thing I can really conclude from our arguement is that we have each taken our own subjective understanding of the term realistic.
I initially took it completely at face value, and then have attempted to see it from a contextual perspective.
You seem to have started argueing from a contextual perspective and have now moved into a more literary realism, that i'm just not sure has any reflection on the point I was actually making in the first place.
So it's like we're argueing apples and oranges
My points in summation:
1. In a completely literal, scientific sense, Batman is more realistic than Superman.
2. There are many many details of Superman's origin story that, even when taking into account the context of a world where powers and aliens exist, make him still more unrealistic in my eyes (i.e. Kents taking him in, Glasses as disguise etc).
And I think i'll just leave it at that!
Well i'm not THAT bull headed. Especially Punisher, who is argueably more realistic even in a literal sense, than Batman is.
I just hadn't thought of him
Just accept that this is the direction they have taken.
Then, you can either decide this version isn't for you and stop watching. OR you can decide to enjoy it for what it is - an elseworlds tale.
'In Elseworlds, super-heroes are taken from their usual settings and put into strange times and places - some that have existed, and others that can't, couldn't or shouldn't exist. The result is stories that make characters who are as familiar as yesterday seem as fresh as tomorrow.'