View Single Post
Old 11-18-2011, 11:53 PM   #107
NateHevens
In Defense of Scientism
 
NateHevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,184
Default Re: Catwoman/Batman sex in the comics

Yeah. My $0.02... I've honestly been waiting for Bruce Wayne/Batman and Selina Kyle/Catwoman to have sex for a very long time.

This is just poorly-written kid-friendly fantasy-indulgence, however.

At the very least, they could have taken off their costumes. Honestly.



I do have to add a quibble, though.

Pornographic? Really? How do y'all define "pornographic"? I'd consider this pornographic if nothing was left to the imagination (fully nude with the full bodies shown), including any possible oral, the act(s) of penetration, and the "money shot" (whatever it might have been).

That, folks, is "pornographic".

This Catwoman panel barely qualifies as PG-13 sex in the modern age. And please don't forget that this is the 21st Century. Quaint imaginings of past decades that never actually existed aside, the times have changed. Embrace it or get out of the way.

Or, at the very least, refine your definition of pornographic to fit more with the modern reality...

Please.


Last edited by NateHevens; 11-18-2011 at 11:56 PM.
NateHevens is offline   Reply With Quote