The SuperHeroHype Forums - View Single Post - Fine like wine: how well have superhero films aged?

Squaremaster316 · 02-18-2012, 11:17 AM

B89 hasn't aged too well. There are some aspects that have lasted (Nicholson, atmosphere, some fights), but others (supporting cast{characters}, plot holes, lack of development of the protagonist, nonsensical visuals). It's easily been eclipsed by Nolan's stronger films

Batman Returns: aged terribly! Ridiculous characters and back stories, along with a lot of plot holes.

Spiderman 1: too over the top with a lot of "REALLY" cheesy dialogue, plus the effects were really bad at times.

Superman 2: The Lester Cut. Pretty much started the awful stigma of "Comic book films shouldn't take themselves seriously". Donner cut is far superior.

02-18-2012, 11:17 AM	#23
Squaremaster316 Side-Kick Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 173	Re: Fine like wine: how well have superhero films aged? B89 hasn't aged too well. There are some aspects that have lasted (Nicholson, atmosphere, some fights), but others (supporting cast{characters}, plot holes, lack of development of the protagonist, nonsensical visuals). It's easily been eclipsed by Nolan's stronger films Batman Returns: aged terribly! Ridiculous characters and back stories, along with a lot of plot holes. Spiderman 1: too over the top with a lot of "REALLY" cheesy dialogue, plus the effects were really bad at times. Superman 2: The Lester Cut. Pretty much started the awful stigma of "Comic book films shouldn't take themselves seriously". Donner cut is far superior.