View Single Post
Old 04-21-2012, 09:01 AM   #38
Mr. Immortal
Homo s. supreme
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The end of time and space.
Posts: 176
Default Re: do you think IM2 was better or worse than the original?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Payaso View Post
Because Downey Jr brought nothing new to the character and all Mickey Rourke did was chewing a toothpick and be calm.

But 'fun'... there were only 3 Iron man appearances; the second one was that stupid friends fight (preceeded by "humorous" drunk Tony Stark peeing in his suit) and the third one was more fast-paced than fun.
I disagree. The first movie was about Tony, an already older man, seeking redemption. This second movie was about Tony learning that he can't do everything himself through his father and his best friend.

Rourke didn't do much after the beginning but I still enjoyed his performance. I liked all of the Iron Man fights, though I agree there could be more.

Mr. Immortal is offline   Reply With Quote