Re: Why Mark Ruffalo?
Originally Posted by Alexei Belyakov
Ruffalo was a great Banner, but Norton was better. Its not even about acting ability, its about the writing behind their respective portrayals. TIH Banner was isolation & pathos. Avengers Banner was quiet cynicism. So [in a heartbeat] I gotta give it to Norton. Ruffalo for me is the Lazenby of the cinematic Banners (Norton being Connery & Bana being Barry Nelson).
Lazenby? If you think that Ruffalo was great then why would you compare him to the worst of the EON Bond actors?
Wachet auf adelaide, wachet!