Re: Why Mark Ruffalo?
Originally Posted by Alexei Belyakov
Ruffalo was a great Banner, but Norton was better. Its not even about acting ability, its about the writing behind their respective portrayals. TIH Banner was isolation & pathos. Avengers Banner was quiet cynicism. So [in a heartbeat] I gotta give it to Norton. Ruffalo for me is the Lazenby of the cinematic Banners (Norton being Connery & Bana being Barry Nelson).
Lazenby? If you think that Ruffalo was great then why would you compare him to the worst of the EON Bond actors?
"The fox escaped and on my way back to the Dreadfort my favorite courser came up lame, so all in all it was a dismal day."