Re: Why Mark Ruffalo?
Originally Posted by Alexei Belyakov
Ruffalo was a great Banner, but Norton was better. Its not even about acting ability, its about the writing behind their respective portrayals. TIH Banner was isolation & pathos. Avengers Banner was quiet cynicism. So [in a heartbeat] I gotta give it to Norton. Ruffalo for me is the Lazenby of the cinematic Banners (Norton being Connery & Bana being Barry Nelson).
Lazenby? If you think that Ruffalo was great then why would you compare him to the worst of the EON Bond actors?
"The smell was something he was born with. A curse, the smallfolk said. The gods had made him stink so that men would know his soul was rotting. Ramsay’s mother appeared at my gates to demand that I provide a servant for my bastard, who was growing up wild and unruly. I gave her Reek. It was meant to be amusing, but he and Ramsay became inseparable. I do wonder, though... was it Ramsay who corrupted Reek, or Reek Ramsay? ”