View Single Post
Old 05-29-2012, 11:11 AM   #42
Banned User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 204
Default Re: Why Mark Ruffalo?

Originally Posted by Alexei Belyakov View Post
^winey & self-pitying? How would you behave if you couldn't have any contact with your family & friends because Homeland Security would throw you in a cell for the rest of your life? How would you act if you couldn't even live on American soil to avoid capture & had to roam in third-world countries like some bum? Why would you even wanna get outta bed in the morning if your entire day revolves around hiding & keeping a low profile whilst being completely isolated from any real human interaction? Yeah, winey & self-pitying sounds about right.
True, but this does not change the fact that as a result Norton's performance was somewhat one dimensional and it also lacked in portraying Banner's scientific side.

Originally Posted by Alexei Belyakov View Post
People forget that Ruffalo's Banner was TIH Banner before finding the quiet acceptance he displayed in The Avengers.
I am not one of these people you speak of.
Ruffalo's portrayal was a lot more balanced, three dimensional and interesting and showed character development.

Originally Posted by Alexei Belyakov View Post
Its revolting to me that the complaints about Norton are really complaints about the state of mind his character was in, a state of mind prior to the character in Whedon's film.
Revolting LOL.
No my complaint is with the writing.
Don't get me wrong I love TIH and I love how it was more dark in tone than any other MS film thus far, but I just think Banner could have been written a bit more interestingly.

Radioactive1980 is offline   Reply With Quote