Originally Posted by The Infernal
To me it just reads like it's an objection to the sexual content. I don't see it as all that far fetched for someone call that sort of sexual content soft porn. At no point does he specifically equate Lesbian sex as soft porn, it seems more like a condemnation of that scene rather than lesbian sex itself on the big screen.
Though perhaps he is narrow minded about lesbians, but I just don't get that from that paragraph. I think you're just hanging it all on one word in a sentence which is arguably just descriptive and nothing else.
There's still too many people that adhere to taboos.
If I had a nickel for every person I've heard call Steve McQueen's SHAME soft porn, I'd be Warren Buffett.
Its disillusioning because studios cater to those people & as long as those people condemn comic book characters to family-friendly molds, we'll never really see them fully dissected or realized the way cinema brilliantly does with non-CBM characters.