Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueLightning
To an extent, because I understand how people can come up with such conclusions, but I disagree because it didn't appear to be like that for me. Primarly, because we are talking about Bruce Wayne story. A sequel with Blake would be more in the field of a spinoff.
|
The audience don't separate that. If it's Batman, it's a Batman film.
Quote:
|
He was still there. Still, seven villains is not to bad
|
I don't count them though, because they aren't "villains" or "freaks".
Quote:
|
The Nolan films are not a straight adaptation of that world. They are a reverent interpretation of the source material which manages to embody most of the greatest aspects of the Batman mythos through the years. It has a different set of rules, in a different media.
|
I was talking about the Nolan world.
Quote:
|
They had, Scarecrow was even being considered for the following film after Batman & Robin. Both Ra's and Scarecrow appeared in other media and are staples in the comic books before the Nolan films.
|
I couldn't remember them and I was a huge fan of the DCAU.