Re: EVERYTHING Black Panther - Part 2
Originally Posted by spideymouse
That's your opinion, but it might not be the direction Marvel is choosing to go. I actually think they're doing both simultaneously. They are planning an Ant-Man movie ("introducing an important new Avengers member," as you said) as well as planning a Doctor Strange movie (expanding the territory of the MCU). And again, let's not complain about Black Panther's exclusion until Phase 3 officially excludes him.
It's important to note that while each phase does culminate with a big team-up or big event movie, Marvel is trying to make each individual film in each phase unique and compelling all on their own. Iron Man 3 will probably be as tied to Avengers 2 as the first Iron Man movie was to the Avengers--easter eggs and a teaser after the credits.The rest of the first Iron Man movie (95% of it) wasn't about building up towards the Avengers--it was about Tony Stark's journey. A Doctor Strange movie can be the same way, even if Phase 3 culminates in Avengers 3.
Also, I disagree that they should wait until phase 4 to expand to other parts of the Marvel Universe. You don't want the audience to think your whole cinematic universe is focused on and directly related to only 6 or 7 superheroes.
I don't see how Dr. Strange is a major expansion to MU.
He's not the Fantastic Four.
It would be a huge mistake to skip a Black Panther solo film just to slightly expand Marvel Universe with a premature Dr. Strange flick.
Why not wait? It's not like Marvel/Disney have many more A-list or B-list characters outside Avengers. Make a classic Avengers trilogy (which means adequate solo films) first.
There's plenty of time for left over characters later. Plenty.
"Don't listen to scientists, academics, fact checkers, journalists, constitutional scholars or intelligence agencies. The truth doesn't matter, only blind obedience" - any authoritarian regime
Last edited by MessiahDecoy123; 02-02-2013 at 10:09 AM.