Originally Posted by cherokeesam
I wish I could share your optimism that Marvel would ramp up production to at least three films per year if they got all their properties back. Most of us were expecting a bigger film slate when The House of Mouse took them under their mantle and threw wads of cash at them, but that never changed their production schedule.
And the fact that you use Magneto, Surfer, Deadpool and Venom solo movies as a reference serves to reinforce that fact --- even if Marvel went to three a year, solo projects like those you mentioned are the ones that are likely to be backburnered by mainstays like Spidey, Iron Man and Wolverine.
Okay from a Hollywood standpoint do you really think it wise for any studio would release all of there major tittles in one year?
Do you really see Spidey, Iron Man and X-men all coming out in one year or will they spread them out with 2 mid to low budget projects?
With Ironman 3 releasing with Thor 2 this year a low to mid range ($60-$80mill) Deadpool could've released in March.
Next year could be Cap, X-men and GOTG.
2015: Dr. Strange, Avengers 2, Ant-man
2016: FF, Cap 3, Thor 3
2017:GOTG 2, Black Panther, X-men2