Originally Posted by psylockolussus
That is still not an excuse to deliver a script full of cliche lines and a film filled with poor visual effects and cinematography. Do you still have to blame Rothman for those things?
You seem to think that if Rothman did any meddling on Origins then it can just easily be made into something great. I disagree. But that doesn't mean I'm absolving Hood of any blame. I'm just saying that we should recognise that executive meddling can have an adverse effect on a movie (and yes, even those aspects you mention can potentially suffer in turn).
That doesn't mean I think Origins would automatically be amazing if Rothman stepped back and just let Hood do his thing (if indeed Rothman actually meddled).