View Single Post
Old 04-22-2013, 02:10 AM   #96
Loose Seal
SHH! Global Moderator
flickchick85's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,664
Default Re: All Things Superman: An Open Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 50

Originally Posted by AntMan View Post

I don't disagree with you. I just think it's a matter of if the audience wil support it. The American public has a history of not going to female lead action films. The Hunger Games kind od fits the action mould though, and the Underworld films are a moderate success, so a Wonder Woman film could make money. I just don't know if WB would take a chance on it.
That's the thing, though - this lack of audience support is a myth that's subscribed to by the execs. The truth is that the audience doesn't support them when they're obviously crap movies. Just like with most films with any type of lead. The audience supported Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor and Katniss Everdeen (and like you said, even Kate Beckinsale on a smaller scale). They didn't support Elektra and Catwoman because you could tell from the get-go that they were godawful. Tomb Raider got mild support befitting such mediocre movies. Salt did fine if not spectacular, for a fine but far from spectacular movie.

Make a product that at least looks good, market it well, and people will show up to see it - that principle's not specific to movies with female leads. The studios just need to show these characters the same kind of care and respect they show their heavy-hitters if they want the quality of product that becomes a hit.


"They say: sufferings are misfortunes...Once we're thrown off our habitual paths, we think all is lost; but it's only here that the new and good begins.

As long as there's life, there's happiness. There's much, much still to come."

flickchick85 is offline