Originally Posted by ShadowBoxer
I confused on how this could be weaker than IM2. When 2 came out it was just like it is people complaining about a weak plot and villian and in 2's case to much Avengers stuff. Vanko was an extremely weak villian and was absent from the screen for a good chunk of the movie or if he was on screen he was in a lab... I mean how could anything be as weak as the final battle in IM2? I am not saying is IM2 horrible ( it's not) but I have a hard to believing 3 is weaker. I think people are just saying that because they are mad about the twist.
Yes I think so. Because killian was easily a better villain than vanko or hammer, and the finale was much more spectacular and the final fight wasn't underwhelming. In im2 vanko showed up, did pretty much nothing, and then died