Originally Posted by Marvin
It's disingenuous to a fault.
The issue has always been about superman killing. "He's better than this, he's more moral than that..."
You mean to tell this whole time it's actually been about the fashion he went about it?
Please. So he can kill, just not in this particular fashion right?
No, I still don't think he should kill at all
. I'm just saying that if it happened in another way people may have overlooked it just like they did in SupermanII. And just like they overlooked it in BB when Bruce seemed to think he wasn't breaking his one rule by letting Ras die. I don't agree but it didn't seem to bother most people in the audience.
I guess what I'm saying is they could have had Superman kill someone in a way that wouldn't have caused this much controversy. But controversy is obviously what they wanted.