Originally Posted by X-Maniac
I think the Mirror reviewer raised valid points even if he was harsh and obviously disappointed. The Telegraph review was mostly nonsense.
I don't doubt it, but I just wanted to point out that Newspaper film reviewers are the worst reviewers on the planet, well at least in the UK where its just not a proper journalistic job, even if the scores were high I would say the exact same thing! They are just the least professional reviews around. Empire and Total Film are proper reviewers and can be relied upon to give a much fairer and honest review and just come across as if they know what they are talking about.
This is why I give no faith in RT and Metacritic scores, there is no weighting to the credibility of the reviewer. So a persons score is just taken at face value, a professional review means as much as a red top rag review done by someone who doesn't want to be in the job.
(X-Men-Apocalypse:The Four Horsemen will rise)
Ex Machina 8.5/10
Kingmsman: TSS 8.2/10
Avengers AOU ?/10 John Wick ?/10
Ant-Man ?/10 Mad Max ?/10 Star Wars TFA ?/10
TFF ?/10 The Man from UNCLE ?/10
Daredevil TV series ?/10