Originally Posted by Axl Van Sixx
Well said. I guess what really rankles with me is this idea that Batman is indisputably worthy of solo movies, whereas Superman - the supposed king of the genre - can't even get to Movie #2 without the Bat getting all up in his grill.
Indeed; it just further proves that there's this double standard against the hero that doesn't seemingly apply to Batman.
People can say all they want that maybe Batman won't be a second protagonist in this film, and that may be true, but the fact that it's the freaking Batman won't change the presence that he'll have on this film, intentional or not.
I've seen people say on how it makes sense for Batman to be in Superman's story, but never the other way around for some reason.
At the end of the day, no matter how Batman is written into the story, Superman got the short end of the stick and nothing can really prove that to be false.