Originally Posted by Comics N' Toons
Am I the only one who thought the 1994 version looked more like a realistic rock monster than the one from the modern films?
Yes and No. The 1994 version definitely looks more like a rock monster than the 2005 version, which just looks more like a man made of rock.
However, neither really looked realistic as far as how he would actually look and how his rock "skin" would move as he did.
I think a mocap CGI Thing is the way to go.
The mocap cg hulk in The Avengers really proved, IMO, that you can mocap The Hulk, or The Thing, and have it look phenomenal and really tangible; real.