Originally Posted by danoyse
You should try reading the article again. The trainer in question is referring to something that happened in 2005.
The only thing that might be a reference to Hugh was the same trainer pointing out an unnamed 40-something actor in a recent studio film's look isn't possible without steroids. Which is an assumption by this trainer.
I would very surprised if Hugh - or any other actor required to transform for a film role - did not take steroids and HGH. What they need to achieve just isn't possible in the time they need to do it in. God knows I've tried!
Everyone I know who has an exceptionally muscular body takes steroids. Many of them admit it and even talk it about on their Facebook pages.